Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Cellulose Nanocrystals Obtained from Agave tequilana Weber Bagasse as Reinforcing Agents for CPC-30R Portland Cement Mortar

A peer-reviewed version of this preprint was published in:
Nanomaterials 2026, 16(18), 1142. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16181142

Submitted:

25 August 2026

Posted:

27 August 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) have been widely investigated as reinforcing agents in different matrices because of their unique properties, including high specific mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and durability. CNCs can be obtained from lignocellulosic residues such as Agave tequilana bagasse, a byproduct of the tequila industry. In this study, cementitious mortar matrices were reinforced with CNCs produced by acid hydrolysis using sulfuric acid (CNC S) and hydrochloric acid (CNC H). Mortar containing different CNC contents, expressed relative to cement mass, were prepared and evaluated in terms of compressive and flexural strength. The resulting materials were further characterized by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). CNC incorporation increased both compressive and flexural strength, with the best-performing formulations containing 0.35 wt.% CNC S and 0.5 wt.% CNC H. SEM observations showed fewer and smaller microcracks and a narrower interfacial transition zone (ITZ) in CNC-containing mortars than in the control. Thermal and structural analyses indicated that CNC incorporation modifies cement hydration and the organization of hydrated phases. FTIR spectra also showed changes in bands associated with hydroxyl, sulfate, carbonate, and silicate environments, suggesting different interactions of CNC S and CNC H with the cementitious matrix. Overall, Agave-derived CNCs show potential as low-dosage reinforcing additives for Portland cement mortars while providing a value-added route for agroindustrial waste.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

In recent decades, there has been a growing demand for eco-friendly and sustainable products made from waste materials [1]. This has required increased research and development efforts to recycle waste materials into biodegradable products with low environmental impact [2,3,4,5].
Cellulose was first identified by the French chemist Anselme Payen in 1838, who isolated cellulose from various plants and determined its molecular formula (C₆H₁₀O₅) through elemental analysis [6]. Plants are composed of interlocking cells forming layers in which cellulose serves as the primary structural component and provides strength to the plant structure [7]. It is also present in living organisms other than plants, such as bacteria and tunicates [8].
Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) are nanoscale cellulose particles with a highly crystalline, typically rod-like morphology [9]. They can be produced by controlled acid hydrolysis and generally exhibit nanometric diameters and lengths of hundreds of nanometers, depending on the cellulose source and processing conditions [10]. Their high stiffness, surface functionality, and nanoscale dimensions make them attractive reinforcing agents for a variety of matrices, including cement-based materials such as cement paste, mortar, and concrete.
Cement is the most widely used construction material in the world. It provides useful and desirable properties, such as compressive strength (it is the construction material with the highest strength per unit cost), durability, and aesthetic appeal for a wide range of construction applications [11]. The reaction by which cement transforms into a binding agent occurs when water is added to it. The silicates and aluminates present in cement form hydration products, such as calcium silicate hydrate (C3S2H3), known as C-S-H gel, in which the released lime precipitates as calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)2] and forms small crystals that, over time, produce a firm, hard mass known as hydrated cement [12].
In an effort to improve the properties of the cementitious matrix, research has been conducted on the addition of wood particles [13], wood extracts [14], and cellulose fibers [15,16,17,18,19,20,21], modified cellulose fibers [22], cellulose pulp [23,24,25], carbon nanotubes and nanofibers [26,27], microcrystalline cellulose particles [3], cellulose nanofibers [21,28,29], cellulose nanocrystals [30,31,32,33,34].
Fu et al. (2017) added 0.2, 0.5, 1.5, and 2% CNC to cement pastes, obtaining higher flexural strength than the control samples. Parveen et al. (2018) found that MCC at 0.5% and 1% increased flexural strength by 19% and 16%, respectively, and compressive strength by 51% for both. They also reported a lower number of pores compared to the reference mortar, indicating that MCC helps improve the homogenization of the cementitious matrix, thereby increasing its stiffness [32].
Zheng et al. (2023) investigated the hydration characteristics of C3S by mixing it with different amounts of CNC and examining the chemical environment of the hydration products [35]. They reported that CNC has an effect like that of superplasticizers in reducing exothermic hydration. They also found that CNC promotes the growth of Ca(OH)₂ and increases the grain size of Ca(OH)₂. CNCs provide additional nucleation sites, which reduce the degree of polymerization and shorten the main chain length of the resulting C-S-H gel. A separate hydration test confirmed that the CNCs sequentially adsorbed calcium ions and silicate ions, which promoted the formation of a C-S-H gel layer on the surface of the CNCs. The size of the nanocrystals allows them to fill the pores that form in the matrix microstructure, reducing the percentage of porosity; it also slows the hydration heat, which increases water accessibility and, therefore, the C-S-H gel content. The presence of nanocrystals eliminates the microcracks that form early in the curing process (0 to 7 days), which also imparts stiffness [21,31]. In turn, these CNCs are compatible with the C-S-H matrix gel interface, promoting good coupling between the two [35].
Montes et al. (2020) reported that the rheological behavior of cement pastes containing CNCs was not strongly correlated with the zeta potential, the average particle length of the CNCs, or the average aspect ratio of the CNC particles. However, it was found that the maximum reduction in the elastic limit occurred at higher CNC dosages as the water-cement ratio increased. Furthermore, rheological measurements suggested that at lower dosages (<0.2%), CNC behaved more like a water-reducing additive, reducing the elastic limit by up to 54%, whereas at higher doses (more than 0.5%), CNCs increased the paste’s elastic limit, similar to certain viscosity-modifying additives [36].
In this study, cellulose nanocrystals obtained from Agave tequilana bagasse were evaluated as reinforcing agents for Portland cement mortars prepared in accordance with ASTM C348-21 [37]. Their effects on compressive and flexural strength were assessed, and the resulting materials were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The valorization of agave bagasse through CNC production provides an opportunity to convert an agroindustrial residue into a value-added material for more sustainable cementitious composites

2. Materials and Methods

CNCs derived from Agave tequilana bagasse were used, obtained using the procedure described by Gallardo et al., 2021 [38], 0.1 N standardized sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3) solution, 0.1 N standardized potassium permanganate (KMnO4) solution from Golden Bell; sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 97% purity), potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7, 99% purity) from Karal S.A. de C.V. (León, Mexico); sodium chlorite (NaClO2, 80% purity), sulfuric acid (H2SO4, 97% purity), hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37% purity), anthraquinone (C14H8O2, 97% purity), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 30% purity), 1.0 M cupriethylenediamine solution (Cu(H2NCH2CH2NH2)2 (OH)2) from Sigma Aldrich (Toluca, Mexico); potassium iodide (KI, 99% purity) from Jalmek (San Nicolás de los Garza, Mexico); Portland cement CPC-30R from Cementos Fortaleza (Hidalgo, Mexico) was used to manufacture the mortars; Ottawa silica sand 16-100 (ASTM C 109 [39], C778 H 3825 [40]) from ELVEC (Mexico City, Mexico) was also used.

2.1. Obtaining Soluble-Grade Pulp

Soluble-grade pulp was obtained according to the procedure reported by Gallardo et al., 2019 [41]. The procedure consists of placing 1 kg of bagasse, previously de-medullated and washed, in a reactor (Jayme-type Digester, model R25/3) in a solution of NaOH and anthraquinone for 2 hours at 160°C. The resulting pulp was characterized according to standard TAPPI methods: the Kappa number was determined using TAPPI Standard 236 om-22 [42]; viscosity and degree of polymerization were determined according to TAPPI Standard T230 om-19 [43]; and α, β, and γ cellulose were determined according to TAPPI Standard T203 cm-22 [44]. Subsequently, the pulp underwent a bleaching process as reported by Gallardo et al., 2019 [41], which consists of five stages: 1) Oxygen stage (O), 2) Chlorine dioxide first stage (DO), 3) Oxygen-peroxide-reinforced stage, 4) Chlorine dioxide final stage, and 5) Oxygen-reinforced peroxide stage. The pulp obtained at the end of these stages was washed, centrifuged, and stored at 4 °C for later use.

2.2. Preparation of Cellulose Nanocrystals via Acid Hydrolysis

To prepare CNC, the procedure reported by Gallardo et al. (2021) [38], was used, starting with soluble-grade pulp, which was subjected to acid hydrolysis with H2SO4 and HCl, the former under conditions of 64% acid concentration, 60 °C temperature, and a reaction time of 70 min. The resulting CNCs are identified as CNC S, whereas hydrolysis with HCl was carried out at a concentration of 8 N, 90 °C, and for 200 min, the resulting nanocrystals are identified as CNC H. In both cases, after hydrolysis, a dialysis process is carried out using HPLC-grade water (milli-Q water with a resistivity of 18.2 MOhm × cm at 25°C) until a pH between 5 and 5.5 is reached. The resulting suspension was then passed through 2, 1.5, and 1 µm filters. The concentration of the CNC solution was determined by gravimetry, and these were subsequently used in aqueous solutions.

2.3. Preparation of the Mortar Mixtures

Mortar mixtures were prepared as specified in ASTM C348-21 [37]. The concentrations of CNC S and CNC H in the mortars were 0.1, 0.2, 0.35, 0.5, and 1.0% by weight of cement, in accordance with the values reported in the literature [31,35,45]. To do this, the aqueous CNC solution was added, and the volume of water was subtracted from the total volume of the mixture. For each CNC concentration, 10 test specimens (5 cubes and 5 beams) were prepared in accordance with ASTM C109/C109M-21 [39] and ASTM C348-21 [37], which specify that the dimensions of the cubes and beams must be 5 × 5 × 5 cm³ and 5 × 5 × 15 cm³, respectively. Cubes are used to evaluate compressive strength, and beams are used to evaluate flexural strength. Each specimen (cube/beam) is removed from the mold 24 hours after being cast and immersed in lime water for 28 days. After this period, their strength (compressive and flexural) is evaluated, and they are characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR).

2.4. Characterization of the Mortars

2.4.1. Compressive Strength

The compressive strength of the cubes was determined using a 25,000-kg universal testing machine manufactured by American Machine and Metals Inc., model RIEHLE (Country), and the tests were conducted in accordance with ASTM C109/21 [39]. A load was applied to the cubes at a rate of 900 to 1,800 N/second until the specimen failed.

2.4.2. Flexural Strength

The flexural strength of the beams was determined using a PRÜFTECHNIK CADIS universal testing machine with a capacity of 5,000 kg, and the tests were conducted in accordance with ASTM C348-21 [37]. The beams were placed on two support points 12 cm apart, with the upper support located exactly at the midpoint of the beam. A load was applied at a rate of 2,600 N/min until the beam failed.

2.4.3. Analysis of the Matrix Microstructure by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

A scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to analyze the microstructure of the mortars; the instrument was a JEOL model JMS-6510 (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), equipped with a GATAN ALTO-1000 cryo-probing unit, an EDS detector, and backscattered electron detection, operating at 20 kV, with a current of 127 μA and a working distance of 15 mm. Two imaging modes were used: secondary electron imaging (SEI) and backscattered electron imaging (BEIW). For this analysis, the untested cubes are taken and cut to obtain a small 1 cm³ cube from the interior of the sample, which is then dried in an oven at 40 °C for 24 hours. They are then placed on Epofix resin with a catalyst to form a pellet, left under vacuum for 5 to 10 minutes, and placed in an oven at 40 °C for 8 hours to allow the resin to solidify. The pellets are polished with P220 and P500 sandpaper and on glass with Al₂O₃ having a particle size of 12 μm. The samples are placed in an ultrasonic bath to remove the alumina, and metallographic polishing is performed using 1 μm diamond paste for 10 minutes and 0.25 μm diamond paste for 10 minutes on velvet. Finally, a carbon coating is applied to the polished surface for analysis by SEM. The resulting micrographs are analyzed using LabVIEW’s VISION software.

2.4.4. Analysis of the Matrix’s Degree of Hydration by Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

A thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) system manufactured at the Polytechnic University of Catalonia (UPC) was used. It consists of a Naber D-25DFL furnace and a PCE LSM200 balance with an accuracy of 0.0001 g; these are connected to a computer running specialized software for the system developed by the UPC. The residue left over from cutting the samples for SEM is used in TGA. It is ground in a mortar and passed through a 4-mm sieve; the retained material is removed, and the remainder is placed in an oven at 40 °C for 24 hours. The sample is then sieved through 4, 2, 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, and 0.063 mm sieves; the material retained on each sieve is weighed, and its percentage of the total weight of the sieved sample is calculated. A representative sample totaling 8 g is prepared, in accordance with the weight percentages calculated for each sample. This sample is placed in the instrument’s sample pan for analysis. A heating ramp of 1 °C every 10 s is used until a temperature of 1000 °C is reached.

2.4.5. Analysis of Plane Orientations and Crystallinity by X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

The equipment used was an Empyrean diffractometer manufactured by PANanalytical (Worcestershire, United Kingdom), operating at 45 kV and 40 mA, with an incident angle ranging from 5 to 70°, in 0.2° increments, and a dwell time of 30 s per step, using CuKɑ radiation filtered through a Ni filter and a graphite monochromator. The powdered sample was placed in a sample holder up to the indicated mark, and the analysis was performed. The results were analyzed using OriginLab’s Origin 2021 software.

2.4.6. Analysis of the Molecular Structure of the Matrix by Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

The molecular structure of the mortar samples was analyzed by Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy using a PerkinElmer Spectrum GX spectrophotometer. Spectra were collected from 4000 to 400 cm⁻¹ at a resolution of 4 cm⁻¹ by averaging 16 scans. The samples were ground in a mortar, mixed with KBr, and pressed into pellets for analysis.

3. Results and Discussion

The characteristics of the soluble-grade pulp used to produce the CNCs correspond to those previously reported by Gallardo et al. (2019) [41], with a KN of 23 ± 3, a viscosity of 10.18 cp, a DP of 750, 94 ± 3% α -cellulose, and a crystallinity value of 79.2%. Meanwhile, the characteristics of the CNCs correspond to those reported by Gallardo et al. (2021), with crystallinities of 91.3% and 90.1% for CNC S and CNC H, respectively. Their lengths were 149 ± 59 nm for CNC S and 266 ± 107 nm for CNC H, with heights of approximately 9 nm and length-to height (L/H) of 16 ± 6 and 31 ± 12 for CNC S and CNC H, respectively. Furthermore, while the CNC S crystals are thin, the CNC H crystals are wide, with width-to-height (W/H) aspect ratios of 4.2 ± 1.3 for CNC S and 10 ± 1.7 for CNC H. In addition, CNC S contained 166 mmol kg⁻¹ of total sulfate groups as a consequence of hydrolysis with H₂SO₄, whereas CNC H did not contain significant surface sulfate groups.

3.1. Compressive and Flexural Strength

Figure 1a and Figure 1b show the effect of CNC S and CNC H content on the compressive and flexural strengths of mortar specimens, respectively, after 28 days of curing. The corresponding values and statistical analysis are provided in Table S1 of the Supplementary Material. Sample codes consist of the letter M followed by the CNC concentration (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.35, 0.5, or 1 wt.%) and a final letter indicating the hydrolysis method: S for sulfuric acid and H for hydrochloric acid.
For compressive strength (Figure 1.a), the maximum values were obtained at 0.35 and 0.5 wt. % for mortars containing CNC S and CNC H, respectively; reaching 30.9 ± 1.7 and 30.7 ± 2.6 MPa. The CNC-free reference sample (M0) exhibited a compressive strength of 22.9 ± 1.7 MPa; therefore, CNC incorporation increased compressive strength by up to approximately 35% for CNC S and 34% for CNC H. Previous studies have reported a 20% increase in compressive strength after the addition of cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) [29], whereas the incorporation of 3 wt.% microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) produced values 7–13% lower than those of the reference sample [3]. Mazlan et al. (2016) [35] used CNC obtained from commercial cellulose to prepare 125 cm³ mortar cubes with a water-to-cement ratio of 0.5 and reported an increase in compressive strength of up to 38% at 0.2% CNC after 28 days. In that study, compressive strength increased at all CNC concentrations, in agreement with the general trend observed here.
Flexural strength showed a similar trend (Figure 1.b). The maximum value for CNC S was 7.1 ± 0.4 MPa at 0.5 wt.% (M0.5 S), whereas CNC H reached 6.7 ± 0.3 MPa at the same concentration (M0.5 H). The unmodified mortar exhibited a flexural strength of 5.6 ± 0.7 MPa, corresponding to increases of approximately 27% and 20% for CNC S and CNC H, respectively.
Similar results have been obtained in cement pastes using MCC and CNC derived from wood and extracted by hydrolysis with H₂SO₄, as reported by Parveen et al. (2018) [33], who incorporated MCC to cement at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5 wt. % relative to cement and reported increases in flexural strength of 19% and 16% at 0.5 and 1 wt.%, respectively. The same study also found a lower number of pores compared to the reference mortar, indicating that MCC helps improve the homogenization of the cementitious matrix, thereby increasing its stiffness. Fu et al. (2017) [32] added CNC to cement pastes at concentrations of 0.2, 0.5, 1.5, and 2%, obtaining flexural strengths measured by the B3B method that were 20% higher than those of the control samples. Cao et al. (2016) [31] prepared Type V cement pastes with a water-to-cement ratio (w/c) of 0.35 and cement-to-volume (w/v) percentages of CNC of 0.04, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, and 1.5%. Flexural strength was evaluated using the B3B method, and values 50% higher than those of the control sample were obtained when 1% replacement was used after 28 days of curing. Similarly, where CNF has been used, increases of 15% have been reported [29].
The measurements yield similar results for both additives (CNC S and CNC H). Furthermore, statistical analysis (see Table S1 of Supplementary Material) shows that, for compressive strength, the type of additive (CNC S or CNC H) does not result in a significant difference, with p > 0.05 in both cases. In Figure 1c, the response for each of the analyzed systems is plotted separately as a function of the CNC concentration for mortar containing CNC S and CNC H, as well as the average of both types of CNC (full symbols). The solid and dotted lines represent best fit to the following equation:
y = y o + A e ( e z z + 1
where: z = (x - xc) / w, y₀ is the offset of y, A is the amplitude, xc is the center, and w is the width of the curve. The fitting parameters are shown in Table 1. In this graph, it can be seen that although the statistical analysis shows no significant difference between the types of CNC (Table S1 in the Supplementary Material), when analyzed individually, there is a crossover point at a concentration of approximately 0.4 wt. % CNC, for concentrations below 0.4, the specimens reinforced with CNC S exhibit greater compressive strength than those reinforced with CNC H, and above this concentration, the behavior is reversed. On the other hand, with regard to flexural strength (Figure 1d), statistical analysis shows that there is a dependence on the type of additive—CNC S or CNC H (Table 1, Supplementary Material)—and that at concentrations below 0.4% CNC, mortars reinforced with CNC H exhibit higher values than those reinforced with CNC S; the opposite is true at higher concentrations. It is also evident that at this crossover point, when comparing the two properties side by side, at concentrations below 0.4% CNC, CNC S exhibits higher compressive strength but lower flexural strength; at concentrations above 0.4%, CNC H exhibits higher compressive strength but lower flexural strength.
The strength improvements obtained in this study were achieved at relatively low CNC contents. Both compressive and flexural strength reached maxima between 0.35 and 0.5 wt.% CNC. Although strength decreased between the optimum concentration and 1 wt.% CNC, the values remained above those of the reference mortar (M0). Changes in hydration kinetics and the development of C-S-H may also contribute to the non-monotonic mechanical response [35,46,47]. At higher CNC contents, excessive interactions among nanocrystals may promote agglomeration and the formation of weak interfaces or local stress-concentration regions, thereby reducing the reinforcing efficiency [29,47,48].
The main finding of the mechanical analysis is that substantial improvements in compressive and flexural strength were achieved at relatively low CNC contents. These improvements may be associated with the water-retention capacity of CNCs and their ability to gradually release water during cement hydration [49,50], thereby favoring the development of C-S-H gel [35]. Their nanoscale dimensions may also allow CNCs to occupy small voids within the cementitious microstructure. In addition, the high stiffness of CNCs (reported elastic modulus of approximately 110–220 GPa) [30], may contribute to mechanical reinforcement when effective stress transfer occurs at the CNC–matrix interface. The interfacial transition zone (ITZ) between sand grains and the cement paste is particularly relevant because microcracks frequently initiate in this region [30]; therefore, the ITZ was examined by SEM to evaluate possible microstructural changes associated with CNC incorporation.

3.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Figure 2 shows SEM micrographs of the analyzed mortars. The main microstructural features identified include the cementitious matrix, sand grains (darker regions), the interfacial transition zone (ITZ) between the cement paste and sand grains, unhydrated cement particles (bright regions), calcium-rich crystalline phases (white regions), capillary pores (dark regions), and hydration products (gray regions).
The M0 control sample exhibits a relatively thick ITZ, approximately 75 nm, together with numerous microcracks of different sizes. These microcracks may arise from two main sources: sample preparation for SEM analysis and shrinkage of the cementitious matrix during setting and curing [51].
In contrast, the M0.35 S and M0.5 H samples exhibit a more homogeneous microstructure, with fewer and smaller microcracks than the M0 sample, consistent with previous reports [3,52,53]. The ITZ is also considerably narrower, with a thickness of approximately 24–25 nm. Figure 3 summarizes the average width and length of the microcracks and the ITZ thickness determined from the SEM micrographs. Twenty measurements of each parameter were performed for each mortar formulation using ImageJ, and the results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. The values are reported in Table S2 of Supplementary Material.
As the CNC content increases, both the microcrack dimensions and ITZ thickness decrease until reaching minimum values at CNC concentrations close to those yielding the highest compressive strengths for both CNC S and CNC H. Above the optimum CNC content, the dimensions of the microcracks and the ITZ tend to increase again. This behavior is consistent with the mechanical results and suggests that, at appropriate concentrations, CNC incorporation promotes a more homogeneous microstructure and improves the quality of the cement paste–sand interface. The reduction in microcrack dimensions and ITZ thickness may therefore contribute to the enhanced mechanical performance of the CNC-containing mortars.
The hydrophilic nature of CNCs, arising from the abundance of surface hydroxyl groups, provides them with a high affinity for water and may influence water distribution within the cementitious matrix. CNC surfaces may also interact with cement hydration products through hydrogen bonding and other interfacial interactions [3]. Their ability to retain water and subsequently make it available locally during hydration may favor the formation of hydration products, including C-S-H, in the vicinity of the CNC surface. In addition, CNCs may act as nucleation sites for hydration products, contributing to the development of a denser and more homogeneous microstructure. The morphology of C-S-H and the porosity of cementitious materials are strongly influenced by cement composition and, particularly, by the water-to-cement ratio (w/c) [54]. The chemical structure of cellulose causes it to expand significantly in order to retain large amounts of water, and as water is released from its structure, it returns to its original volume [3].
The microcrack dimensions and ITZ thickness are generally greater in mortars containing CNC H than in those containing CNC S. Differences in CNC dimensions may contribute to this behavior, since CNC S and CNC H exhibit different characteristic sizes (149 ± 59 nm for CNC S and 266 ± 107 nm for CNC H). However, CNC surface chemistry may also play an important role because CNC S contains sulfate surface groups, whereas CNC H is predominantly hydroxyl-functionalized. At CNC concentrations above the optimum range, the increasing microcrack dimensions and ITZ thickness may also be associated with reduced CNC dispersion and increased nanocrystal–nanocrystal interactions.
Another interesting feature observed in the CNC-containing mortars is the formation of a ring- or shell-like region around some unhydrated cement particles. This feature may be associated with the adsorption of CNCs onto cement particles and a steric stabilization effect, as previously proposed for CNC-containing cementitious systems [30]. Such interfacial effects, together with the reduction in microcrack dimensions and ITZ thickness, may contribute to a more homogeneous cementitious microstructure and improved stress transfer between the cement paste and sand grains, thereby supporting the enhanced mechanical performance observed in the CNC-containing mortars.

3.3. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

Figure 4 shows the TGA curves of the control mortar (M0) and mortars containing different concentrations of CNC S and CNC H. Overall, all samples exhibit similar thermal profiles, indicating that CNC incorporation does not substantially alter the main thermal decomposition stages of the cementitious matrix. Overall, the study variables generally exhibit similar trends in their temperature versus weight loss curves. When subdividing their curves into the standard ranges used in such studies, three general temperature regions can be distinguished:
a)
a common initial phase for all variables, characterized by a downward slope ranging from 90 to 400 °C, mainly associated with the loss of physically and chemically bound water from hydration products, with maximum acceleration of the slope increase occurring between 150 and 250 °C;
b)
in the temperature range between 500 and 600 °C, primarily related to the dehydroxylation of portlandite, no acceleration in the change in slope is observed, but there is an increase in the slope compared to the previous region;
c)
temperature range between 700 °C and 1000 °C; mainly associated with the decomposition of carbonate-containing phases. In this case, the inflection point marking the start of the acceleration in the rate of increase is set at 750 °C.
The total mass losses of the different mortars were very similar. The control sample exhibited a total mass loss of 9.90 ± 0.024%, whereas the CNC-containing mortars showed comparable values. M0.35 S and M0.5 H, which exhibited the highest compressive strengths, both showed a total mass loss of approximately 9.88%. Therefore, total mass loss alone does not provide sufficient evidence to establish differences in thermal stability among the samples. Instead, the distribution of mass loss among the different temperature regions provides more useful information regarding changes in hydration products induced by CNC incorporation. The above applies in general, with the exception of sample M1 H (weight loss of 9.96%), which may have been due to structural and physical aspects of CNC use (overdosing of CNC caused it to agglomerate in the matrix, tending to adhere and precipitate), which create areas of high concentration that increase weight loss in the test [3].
The M0.35 S and M0.5 H mixtures (which exhibited better compressive strength) showed a weight loss of 9.88%. These values are lower than those reported by Metalssi et al. (2014) [52], in which cellulose ether was used (a difference of 1.56% compared to the control and with 0.1 to 2% replacement). Furthermore, Jiao et al. (2016) [29] added 0.4% CNF to the mortar, which showed a 1.7% weight loss compared to the control; and Gómez et al. (2013) [3] used a 3% CMC replacement in cement pastes (cement and water) and obtained a positive difference of 3.5% overall. Finally, there are studies in the literature that use sawdust and wood, which also show greater weight loss than the reference samples; these studies explain this effect by noting that the thermal degradation pattern is related to the pyrolysis of lignocellulosic materials [55].
At the same time, the degree of hydration (DOH) was estimated by measuring the total mass of chemically bound water (CBW) in the mortar matrices (determined by TGA). Figure 4 shows the percentage of the degree of hydration (% DOH) of the mortars, obtained using the method of Pane and Hansen (2005) [56]; while Table S3 in the supplementary material shows the values obtained. The mass loss between 140 and 1000 °C was used to estimate CBW, which was subsequently normalized to the final sample mass and related to the theoretical CBW content of fully hydrated cement (0.23 g g⁻¹ cement) [30].
Figure 5 shows a graph of %DOH as a function of CNC concentration for mortars reinforced with CNC S and CNC H. The symbols represent the experimental data, while the lines represent the fit to Equation (1). Only small differences in DOH were observed among the samples, and these variations did not reproduce the trends observed for compressive or flexural strength. Therefore, the estimated DOH should be interpreted cautiously and suggests that the improvement in mechanical performance cannot be explained solely by changes in the overall degree of hydration. However, the theory governing the behavior of this type of matrix states that, in general, the presence of CNC will cause more water to react with the cement (in this case, the weight loss was lower and is attributed to the CNC). Another point is that there may be physical and structural effects that could “prevent” proportional behavior, such as the blocking or encapsulation of cement particles, until, at high doses of CNC, these effects are overcome and an increase in DOH occurs. One possible explanation for this increase is that CNCs help cement particles react more efficiently with water. This may be due to steric stabilization, which is the same mechanism observed in some types of water-reducing additives that disperse cement particles during mixing, resulting in finer and more uniform cement distributions [30].
CNCs have a high water-retention capacity, which may influence setting and cement hydration [3]. This behavior may favor the local formation of hydration products and contribute, together with microstructural and interfacial effects, to the improved mechanical performance [30,57]. Furthermore, CNCs are generally more useful than other types of nanomaterials in the cement matrix, such as cellulose nanofibers (CNFs), which have been found to cause aggregation and reduce the workability of such matrices [30], according to Gómez et al. (2013) [3], microcrystalline cellulose particles also reduce the workability of fresh cement matrices and delay the hydration reaction. This is a significant difference compared to CNCs, since, because they are smaller, a larger volume of them is needed to cause agglomeration and impair the performance of these matrices; this gives CNCs an advantage over other nanomaterials.
Although CNCs have been reported to influence cement hydration through water retention, nucleation, and dispersion effects [3,30,57], the small variations in the estimated DOH observed here indicate that other factors, including CNC dispersion, surface chemistry, and microstructural changes, may also contribute to the mechanical response. In particular, CNC S and CNC H differ in both dimensions and surface chemistry, since CNC S contains sulfate surface groups whereas CNC H is predominantly hydroxyl-functionalized. These differences may influence their interactions with cement hydration products.
Figure 6 shows the temperature ranges at which weight loss occurs for various compounds that make up the cementitious matrix and the CNCs [3,30,55,57,58,59,60,61]. The process can be broken down into the following simplified phases:
  • loss of physically bound water (PBW);
  • degradation of chemically bound water (CBW).
These phases make it possible to identify water losses and weight drops on the TGA curve.
Because the TGA curves largely overlap, the mass-loss contributions associated with physically bound water (PBW) and chemically bound water (CBW) were analyzed separately (determined by graphical integration using Origin 2021 from OriginLab). PBW was determined from the mass loss between 50 and 140 °C, (the lower limit was set at 50 °C to minimize error, since the initial temperature varied for each measurement), whereas CBW was estimated from the mass loss between 140 and 1000 °C. The variations among samples were relatively small, approximately 0.25% for PBW and 0.43% for CBW, the obtained values are reported in Table S3 of Supplemental Material. Nevertheless, both CNC types exhibited a similar non-monotonic trend and are shown in Figure 7 as a function of CNC concentration for CNC S and CNC H; the symbols represent the experimental results, while the curve represents the best fit to the experimental data (Equation 1). CBW initially increased with CNC concentration, reached a maximum, and subsequently decreased, whereas PBW showed the opposite behavior. Interestingly, the maximum CBW contribution occurred within the CNC concentration range associated with the highest mechanical strengths.
This behavior suggests that, at appropriate concentrations, CNCs may favor the conversion of physically retained water into water associated with hydration products, consistent with their proposed water-retention and nucleation effects [56]. At higher CNC concentrations, reduced dispersion or CNC agglomeration may limit this effect.
The small difference between CNC S and CNC H in chemically bound water indicates that the negative charge carried by CNC S—while helping them repel one another—also allows them to form weak bonds with cement ions and ultimately retain more water than CNC H. Although the weight losses were not significantly different from those of the control sample, this confirmed that adding CNC to the mortar does not adversely affect its properties; on the contrary, it improves them.
To further resolve the overlapping thermal events, derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) curves were calculated from the TGA data. Figure 8 shows representative DTG curves for mortars containing CNC S; similar analysis was performed for CNC H. Deconvolution of the DTG profiles revealed thermal events centered at approximately 171, 222, 514, 560, 818, and 844 °C (using deconvolution with Origin Lab’s Origin 21). Figure 9 compares the areas of the events at 171, 222, 514, and 560 °C as a function of CNC concentration.
The peak at 171 °C, representing 22.2 ± 1.4%, tends to remain constant with random variation relative to the CNC concentration; it may be associated with the release of weakly bound water from hydrated phases. In contrast, the area of the event at approximately 222 °C increased with CNC incorporation. This behavior may reflect an increased contribution from chemically bound water associated with hydrated products, including C-S-H and hydrated aluminate phases, and is consistent with a possible influence of CNC on hydration and nucleation processes. This suggests that CNCs promote hydration through a nucleation effect, since their high surface area and hydroxyl groups may facilitate the precipitation of hydrated products around the nanocrystals, with CNC H being the type of CNC that has the highest number of hydroxyl groups.
The peak at 514°C shows a decrease in area with increasing CNC concentration, which can be attributed to the dehydroxylation of portlandite, suggesting that there is less portlandite in the system because CNCs promote the formation of C-S-H gel, either through more efficient hydration or through interaction between the CNC surface and calcium ions, which is corroborated by the observed increase in the peak areas at 222 °C. However, the increase in peak area at 560 °C and the nonlinear behavior observed in the peak areas at 844 °C suggest that, the area diminution at the peak of 514 °C should not necessarily be interpreted as a direct reduction of the amount of portlandite. Rather, the redistribution of the DTG contributions in this temperature region suggests changes in the thermal environment and/or organization of calcium-containing phases. At higher concentrations, CNCs may alter the microstructure, promoting the formation of carbonate phases or leading to agglomeration, rather than simply causing a monotonic increase or decrease in a single hydration product.
Overall, the TGA/DTG results indicate that CNC incorporation has only a minor effect on total mass loss but modifies the relative contributions of individual thermal events associated with hydrated and carbonated phases. These changes depend on CNC concentration and surface chemistry. To determine whether these thermal differences are accompanied by changes in the crystalline phases of the cementitious matrix, the mortars were subsequently analyzed by XRD.

3.4. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

Figure 10 shows the XRD patterns of the control mortar (M0) and the mortars containing 0.35 wt.% CNC S (M0.35 S) and 0.5 wt.% CNC H (M0.5 H). The three diffractograms exhibit similar profiles, with the same main crystalline phases but differences in relative peak intensities. The most intense reflection is observed at approximately 26° 2θ and is assigned to quartz (Q, SiO₂), which originates predominantly from the siliceous sand. Additional quartz reflections are observed at approximately 22°, 39°, 43°, 60°, and 68° 2θ. Portlandite (P, Ca(OH)₂) is identified by reflections at approximately 18°, 37°, 47°, and 51° 2θ, whereas reflections associated with residual anhydrous cement phases are observed at approximately 29° for tricalcium silicate (C₃S, alite) and 33° for dicalcium silicate (C₂S, belite). A reflection at approximately 5° is assigned to muscovite [M, KAl₂(AlSi₃O₁₀)(OH)₂] [55,61,62,63]. [55,61,62,63].
No additional crystalline phases were detected after CNC incorporation, indicating that the overall crystalline phase composition of the mortars remained essentially unchanged. However, differences in the relative intensities of some portlandite reflections were observed in M0 compared to M0.35 S, and M0.5 H. These variations suggest that CNC incorporation influences the development and/or crystalline organization of hydration products [52,64]. Nevertheless, because conventional XRD measurements are semi-quantitative and peak intensities may also be affected by preferred orientation, crystallite characteristics, and sample preparation, these differences should be interpreted with caution [53].
Two portlandite reflections are particularly noteworthy. The reflection at approximately 18° 2θ becomes more intense in the mortar containing CNC S, whereas the reflection at approximately 51° 2θ shows a comparatively greater increase for CNC H. Since both reflections correspond to portlandite, these differences do not necessarily indicate the formation of distinct crystalline phases. Rather, they may reflect differences in preferred crystallographic orientation, crystallite size or degree of ordering of portlandite formed in the presence of the two CNC types.
The different behavior of CNC S and CNC H may be related to their surface chemistry. The sulfate groups present on CNC S can interact with Ca²⁺ ions and may provide preferential sites for the nucleation and growth of calcium-containing hydration products. In contrast, CNC H lacks significant surface sulfate groups and contains predominantly hydroxyl-functionalized surfaces; therefore, its influence on hydration may be associated mainly with water retention, surface nucleation, and hydrogen-bonding interactions. These different interfacial environments may affect the growth and organization of portlandite crystals without necessarily changing the overall crystalline phase composition of the mortar.
This interpretation is consistent with the DTG results (Figure 9), where the contribution centered at approximately 514 °C decreases while that around 560 °C increases with CNC incorporation. Rather than indicating a simple increase or decrease in the total portlandite content, this redistribution of thermal contributions may reflect changes in the physicochemical environment, organization, or thermal stability of calcium-containing phases. The combined XRD and TGA results therefore suggest that CNC incorporation modifies the organization of hydration products and that the response depends, at least in part, on CNC surface chemistry.

3.5. Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

Figure 11 shows the FTIR-ATR spectra of mortars containing (a) CNC S and (b) CNC H at different concentrations, compared with the control mortar (M0). The characteristic absorption bands of cementitious materials can be identified in several spectral regions [65]:
a)
In the 400–800 cm⁻¹ region, several bands associated with silicate phases are observed. The band at approximately 475 cm⁻¹ is attributed to Si–O bending vibrations in SiO₂ [65,66,67,68,69], whereas the band at approximately 695 cm⁻¹ is associated with symmetric Si–O vibrations in SiO₄ units [65,68]. Bands at approximately 459 and 518 cm⁻¹ have been associated with Al–O/Si–O vibrations [68], while the doublet at 779 and 797 cm⁻¹ is characteristic of crystalline α-quartz [66,69,70]. Furthermore, the doublet indicates that the quartz in the silica sand is crystalline in the α-phase.
b)
In the range from 900 to 1000 cm-1, hydration products such as C-S-H gel appear in concrete. The band at approximately 968 cm⁻¹ is commonly assigned to Si–O stretching vibrations in C-S-H-type hydration products [67,68,71,72,73,74,75,76]. The band around 874 cm⁻¹, together with the intense absorption around 1415 cm⁻¹, is mainly associated with carbonate species resulting from carbonation of the cementitious matrix attributed to the bending and stretching vibrations, respectively, in the plane of the C-O and C-H bonds resulting from the reaction between Ca(OH)₂ and CO₂ in the air [77]. On the other hand, Kocak reports that the peak at 871 corresponds to the Si-O bond [68].
c)
At approximately 1200 cm⁻¹, the silicates and aluminates formed during cement hydration appear [65]. It has been reported that the bands at 1120 cm⁻¹ and 1140 cm⁻¹ are due to the S-O vibrations of the sulfate present in ettringite [Ca₆Al₂(SO₄)₃(OH)₁₂·26H₂O] [78], which is a hydration product of tricalcium aluminate (C3A) with calcium sulfate (CaSO₄), both of which are present in cement [58,75,76,77]. However, in these spectra, these bands overlap with the CaCO₃ band at 1083 cm⁻¹, which exhibits a shoulder at 1167 cm⁻¹—also attributed to silica sand—along with the signals at 475 and 779–797 cm⁻¹ [66,69,76,80].
d)
The bands observed around 1400–1450 cm⁻¹ are primarily associated with C–O stretching vibrations of carbonate species, and peaks at 1415, and 1451 cm⁻¹ can be observed. Similar bands have been reported at 1420 [68], 1429 [67], and 1431 [75].
e)
The sharp band at approximately 3646 cm⁻¹ is assigned to O–H stretching in portlandite, Ca(OH)₂ [67,77,79,81], whereas the broad absorption extending approximately from 3100 to 3700 cm⁻¹ is associated predominantly with hydrogen-bonded O–H groups and adsorbed or bound water in the hydrated cementitious matrix.
Although CNC incorporation does not produce major changes in the overall FTIR profiles, differences in the relative intensity and shape of several bands are evident between mortars containing CNC S and CNC H, particularly around 3400, 1740, 1417, 1372, 1213, 1082, and 968 cm⁻¹. These differences suggest that CNC surface chemistry influences the local chemical environment of the cement hydration products.
Analyzing the spectra from left to right, a very small peak at 3646 cm−1 is visible in all of them, corresponding to the hydroxyl group in Ca(OH)2 [67,77,79,81]. The broad O–H region is more pronounced in some CNC-containing mortars, particularly those containing CNC H. The most notable finding here relates to the reduction in the hydroxyl group peak in the M+ CNC S and M+ CNC H spectra, compared to the CNC S and CNC H spectra [38], which may indicate the formation of bonds between the hydroxyl groups of the CNC and the cement hydration products. However, direct comparison with the spectra of isolated CNC must be interpreted cautiously because of the low CNC concentration in the mortar. Changes in the position, shape, and relative intensity of this region are nevertheless consistent with modification of the hydrogen-bonding environment after CNC incorporation and may reflect interactions between CNC hydroxyl groups, water, and cement hydration products. It has been reported potential implications for charge transfer between CNC particles and hydration products, which affect the mechanical behavior of mortars [53].
A weak band around 1740 cm⁻¹ is observed in the CNC-containing mortars, particularly in mortars containing CNC S and at the higher concentrations of CNC H. This region is commonly associated with C=O stretching vibrations [82]; neither the cement, nor its hydration products, nor the CNC contain this bond. Therefore, a hypothesis has been proposed that interactions exist between OH or SO₃ groups in the CNC and the components that make up the mortar matrix, likely generating unidentified species containing carbonyl (C=O) groups [70]. The appearance and concentration-dependent intensity of this band indicate a modification of the chemical environment associated with carbonyl-containing species after CNC incorporation. However, FTIR alone does not allow unambiguous identification of the species responsible for this absorption or demonstrate the formation of new covalent bonds between CNC and the cementitious matrix. The more pronounced contribution observed for CNC S suggests that the different surface chemistry of sulfated CNC may influence these interactions.
A further difference between CNC S and CNC H containing mortars is observed in the 1350–1450 cm⁻¹ region. For CNC H, a broad and intense band centered around 1415 cm⁻¹ is observed, with the contribution near 1372 cm⁻¹ appearing mainly as a shoulder. In contrast, mortars containing CNC S exhibit a better-resolved contribution near 1372 cm⁻¹ [83,84]. As previously mentioned, the bands around 1410 cm⁻¹ in mortars are due to carbonates, which originate from the cement raw materials and carbonation during storage or use. For CNC S, this can be attributed to vibrations associated with sulfate groups or with carbonates that are less crystalline or modified by interaction with Ca²⁺; the surface sulfate groups can coordinate with calcium ions, creating more well-defined chemical environments and causing this signal to be better resolved [85]. For CNC-H, which does not contain any significant surface sulfate groups, the 1372 cm⁻¹ signal is superimposed on the 1417 cm⁻¹ signal, which is typical of carbonates, particularly CO₃²⁻ from calcite or matrix carbonation [30]. This suggests that in CNC-H, the contribution of calcium carbonates is more dominant, whereas in CNC-S, there is an additional contribution from sulfate or carbonate groups in different environments.
The band near 968 cm⁻¹, assigned mainly to Si–O stretching vibrations in C-S-H-type hydration products, is more clearly resolved in mortars containing CNC H. This may indicate differences in the local silicate environment and/or organization of C-S-H-type products in the presence of CNC H. Such behavior is consistent with the proposed ability of hydroxyl-rich CNC surfaces to retain water and provide nucleation sites for hydration products [86,87]. This is consistent with the idea that CNC-H physically interacts with the matrix via hydrogen bonding. In mortars containing CNC S, the contribution near 968 cm⁻¹ appears mainly as a shoulder of the more intense band centered around 1083 cm⁻¹. The sulfate groups present on CNC S may contribute to the complex overlapping vibrations in the 1000–1200 cm⁻¹ region, where sulfate- and silicate-related bands coexist. Consequently, the C-S-H-associated contribution may be less clearly resolved in CNC S-containing mortars [87]. These differences are qualitatively consistent with the DTG results, particularly the changes observed in the thermal event around 222 °C, where greater weight loss is observed for CNC H than for CNC S, associated with chemically bound water in hydrated phases. Taken together, FTIR and DTG suggest that CNC S and CNC H influence the hydration environment differently, although neither technique alone allows quantitative determination of the amount of C-S-H formed.
Taken together, these results suggest that CNC S and CNC H modify the local chemical environment of cement hydration products in different ways. The differences are consistent with their distinct surface chemistries: CNC S contains sulfate groups in addition to hydroxyl groups, whereas CNC H is predominantly hydroxyl-functionalized. Thus, both CNC types may participate in interfacial interactions with the cementitious matrix, but the relative contributions of sulfate-mediated interactions, hydrogen bonding, water retention, and surface nucleation are expected to differ.
These spectroscopic differences, together with the microstructural, thermal, and XRD results, support the hypothesis that the mechanical reinforcement provided by CNCs arises not only from their nanoscale dimensions but also from concentration-dependent interfacial interactions governed by their surface chemistry.

4. Conclusions

Incorporating cellulose nanocrystals from Agave tequilana bagasse improved the mechanical performance of Portland cement mortars at relatively low CNC contents. The highest compressive strengths were obtained at 0.35 wt.% CNC S and 0.5 wt.% CNC H, corresponding to increases of approximately 35% and 34%, respectively, relative to the control mortar. Flexural strength also increased, reaching improvements of approximately 27% for CNC S and 20% for CNC H at 0.5 wt.% CNC.
SEM analysis showed that CNC incorporation modified the mortar microstructure, reducing the size and number of microcracks and decreasing the thickness of the interfacial transition zone near the CNC concentrations associated with maximum mechanical strength. These observations suggest that, at appropriate concentrations, CNCs contribute to a more homogeneous cementitious microstructure and improved stress transfer at the cement paste–sand interface.
The TGA/DTG results showed only minor differences in total mass loss among the mortars but revealed changes in the relative contributions of hydrated and carbonated phases. In particular, the increase in the thermal event near 222 °C and the redistribution of the contributions around 514–560 °C suggest that CNC incorporation modifies the physicochemical environment of cement hydration products rather than simply increasing or decreasing a single phase.
XRD analysis showed that CNC incorporation did not generate additional crystalline phases, although changes in the relative intensities of portlandite reflections were observed. These differences suggest that CNC S and CNC H may influence the organization and growth of calcium-containing hydration products differently, likely because of differences in their surface chemistry.
FTIR analysis further supported this interpretation. Mortars containing CNC H exhibited a more clearly resolved band near 968 cm⁻¹, associated with Si–O vibrations in C-S-H-type hydration products, whereas in CNC S-containing mortars this contribution appeared mainly as a shoulder of the more intense band near 1083 cm⁻¹. Differences in the 1372–1415 cm⁻¹ region also indicate that sulfate-functionalized CNC S and predominantly hydroxyl-functionalized CNC H modify the local chemical environment of the cementitious matrix in different ways.
Taken together, the mechanical, microstructural, thermal, XRD, and FTIR results indicate that CNC reinforcement depends not only on nanocrystal size and concentration but also on surface chemistry. CNC S and CNC H achieve comparable mechanical improvements through interfacial environments that are not necessarily identical. CNC derived from Agave tequilana bagasse therefore represents a promising strategy for valorizing agroindustrial waste while improving the performance of cementitious materials and contributing to more sustainable construction.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org. Table S1. Compressive and Flexural Strenght of mortars with CNC S, CNC H, average and statistical analyses. Table S2. Average microcracks and ITZ sizes of the mortars. Table S3. DOH, Physical and Chemical Bond Water obtained from ATG analyses.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.G.-E., J.M.V. G.-S and E.R.M.-B.; methodology, M.AG.-S., J.A.-H., S.G.-E., and E.R.M.-B.; validation, E.R.M.-B.; formal analysis, M.AG.-S., G.L.-G., and E.R.M.-B.; investigation, M.AG.-S., S.G.-E., and E.R.M.-B.; resources, S.G.-E., and E.R.M.-B.; data curation, E.R.M.-B.; writing—original draft preparation, S.G.-E., G.L.-G., E.R.M.-B.; writing—review and editing, S.G.-E., G.L.-G., J.M.V. G.-S and E.R.M.-B.; visualization, E.R.M.-B.; supervision, S.G.-E., J.M.V. G.-S, and E.R.M.-B.; project administration, S.G.-E., and E.R.M.-B.; funding acquisition, J.A.-H., J.M.V. G.-S and E.R.M.-B.. Author J.M.V. G.-S passed away prior to the publication of this manuscript. All other authors have read and agreed to the published version of this manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to thank Mexico’s National Council for Science and Technology for the scholarship awarded to Manuel Alberto Gallardo Sánchez to support his doctoral studies in Materials Science (Grant No. 334914).

Acknowledgments

This work is dedicated to the memory of our colleague and co-author, Prof. José Manuel Vicente Gómez Soberón, whose valuable contributions and commitment were instrumental in the development of this research. We gratefully acknowledge his scientific contributions and honor his memory through this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest

References

  1. Ng, H. M.; Sin, L. T.; Tee, T. T.; Bee, S. T.; Hui, D.; Low, C. Y.; Rahmat, A. R. Extraction of cellulose nanocrystals from plant sources for application as reinforcing agent in polymers. Compos. Part B Eng. 2015, 75, 176–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bilba, K.; Savastano J., H.; Ghavami, K. Treatments of non-wood plant fibers used as reinforcement in composite materials. Mater. Res. 2013, 16, 903–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gómez, H. G.; Cristia, E.; Vázquez, A. Effect of cellulose microcrystalline particles on properties of cement based composites. Mater. Des. 2013, 51, 810–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mehra, P.; Gupta, R. C.; Thomas, B. S. Properties of concrete containing jarosite as a partial substitute for fine aggregate. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 120, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Terrero J., I. A. Adición de microcristales de celulosa al compuesto de cemento. Master dissertation, Polytechic University of Cartagena. Spain, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  6. Marchessault, R. H.; Sundararajan, P. R. Cellulose. In The polysaccharides; Aspinall, Geraldo O., Ed.; Academic press: New York, 1985; pp. 11–95. [Google Scholar]
  7. HPS, A. K.; Saurabh, C. K.; Asniza, M.; Tye, Y. Y.; Fazita, M. R. N.; Syakir, M. I.; Fizree, H.M.; Yusra, A. F. I.; Haafiz, M. K. M.; Kassim, M. A.; Suraya, N. L. M. Nanofibrillated cellulose reinforcement in thermoset polymer composites. In Cellulose-Reinforced Nanofiber Composites; Jawaid, M., Boufi, S., H.PS., A. K., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Chennai, India, 2017; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  8. Brinchi, L.; Cotana, F.; Fortunati, E.; Kenny, J. M. Production of nanocrystalline cellulose from lignocellulosic biomass: technology and applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 94(1), 154–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Mariano, M.; El Kissi, N.; Dufresne, A. Cellulose nanocrystals and related nanocomposites: Review of some properties and challenges. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2014, 52(12), 791–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lin, N.; Dufresne, A. Nanocellulose in biomedicine: Current status and future prospect. Eur. Polym. J. 2014, 59, 302–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jackson, P.J. Portland Cement: Classification and Manufacture. In Lea's Chemistry of Cement and Concrete, 4th ed.; Hewlett, P.C., Ed.; Arnold: London, UK, 1998; pp. 25–94. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lawrence, C.D. The Constitution and Specification of Portland Cements. In Lea's Chemistry of Cement and Concrete, 4th ed.; Hewlett, P.C., Ed.; Arnold: London, UK, 1998; pp. 131–193. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fan, M.; Ndikontar, M. K.; Zhou, X.; Ngamveng, J. N. Cement-bonded composites made from tropical woods: Compatibility of wood and cement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 36, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Vaickelionis, G.; Vaickelioniene, R. Cement hydration in the presence of wood extractives and pozzolan mineral additives. Ceram. Silik. 2006, 50(2), 115. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mansur, M. A.; Aziz, M. A. A study of jute fibre reinforced cement composites. Int. J. Cem. Compos. Lightweight Concr. 1982, 4(2), 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sanjuán, M. A.; Toledo F., R. D. Effectiveness of crack control at early age on the corrosion of steel bars in low modulus sisal and coconut fibre-reinforced mortars. Cem. Concr. Res. 1998, 28(4), 555–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bilba, K.; Arsène, M. A.; Ouensanga, A. Sugar cane bagasse fibre reinforced cement composites. Part I. Influence of the botanical components of bagasse on the setting of bagasse/cement composite. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2003, 25(1), 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Toledo F., R. D.; Ghavami, K.; Sanjuán, M. A.; England, G. L. Free, restrained and drying shrinkage of cement mortar composites reinforced with vegetable fibres. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2005, 27(5), 537–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sedan, D.; Pagnoux, C.; Smith, A.; Chotard, T. Mechanical properties of hemp fibre reinforced cement: Influence of the fibre/matrix interaction. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2008, 28(1), 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ardanuy, M.; Claramunt, J.; Toledo Filho, R. D. Cellulosic fiber reinforced cement-based composites: A review of recent research. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 79, 115–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Correia, V. C.; Santos, S. F.; Savastano, H., Jr.; John, V. M. Utilization of vegetable fibers for production of reinforced cementitious materials. RILEM Tech. Lett. 2017, 2, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yan, L.; Chouw, N.; Huang, L.; Kasal, B. Effect of alkali treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of coir fibers, coir fiber reinforced-polymer composites and reinforced-cementitious composites. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 112, 168–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Savastano, H., Jr.; Warden, P. G.; Coutts, R. S. P. Mechanically pulped sisal as reinforcement in cementitious matrices. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2003, 25(3), 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mohr, B. J.; Nanko, H.; Kurtis, K. E. Durability of kraft pulp fiber–cement composites to wet/dry cycling. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2005, 27(4), 435–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mármol, G.; Santos, S. F. D.; Savastano, H., Jr.; Borrachero, M. V.; Monzó, J.; Payá, J. Mechanical and physical performance of low alkalinity cementitious composites reinforced with recycled cellulosic fibres pulp from cement kraft bags. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 49, 422–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Parveen, S.; Rana, S.; Fangueiro, R. A review on nanomaterial dispersion, microstructure, and mechanical properties of carbon nanotube and nanofiber reinforced cementitious composites. J. Nanomater. 2013, 710175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Parveen, S.; Rana, S.; Fangueiro, R.; Paiva, M. C. Microstructure and mechanical properties of carbon nanotube reinforced cementitious composites developed using a novel dispersion technique. Cem. Concr. Res. 2015, 73, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sun, X.; Wu, Q.; Lee, S.; Qing, Y.; Wu, Y. Cellulose nanofibers as a modifier for rheology, curing and mechanical performance of oil well cement. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6(1), 31654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Jiao, L.; Su, M.; Chen, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, H.; Dai, H. Natural cellulose nanofibers as sustainable enhancers in construction cement. PLoS ONE 2016, 11(12), e0168422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Cao, Y.; Zavaterri, P.; Youngblood, J.; Moon, R.; Weiss, J. The influence of cellulose nanocrystal additions on the performance of cement paste. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2015, 56, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cao, Y.; Zavattieri, P.; Youngblood, J.; Moon, R.; Weiss, J. The relationship between cellulose nanocrystal dispersion and strength. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 119, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fu, T.; Montes, F.; Suraneni, P.; Youngblood, J.; Weiss, J. The influence of cellulose nanocrystals on the hydration and flexural strength of Portland cement pastes. Polymers 2017, 9(9), 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Parveen, S.; Rana, S.; Ferreira, S.; Fangueiro, R. Ultrasonic dispersion of micro crystalline cellulose for developing cementitious composites with excellent strength and stiffness. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 122, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zheng, D.; Yang, H.; Feng, W.; Fang, Y.; Cui, H. Modification mechanism of cellulose nanocrystals in cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 2023, 165, 107089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mazlan, D.; Din, M.; Tokoro, C.; Ibrahim, I. S. Cellulose nanocrystals addition effects on cement mortar matrix properties. Int. J. Adv. Mech. Civ. Eng. 2016, 3(1), 44–48. [Google Scholar]
  36. Montes, F.; Fu, T.; Youngblood, J. P.; Weiss, J. Rheological impact of using cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) in cement pastes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 235, 117497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. ASTM C348-21; Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars. American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021.
  38. Gallardo-Sánchez, M. A.; Diaz-Vidal, T.; Navarro-Hermosillo, A. B.; Figueroa-Ochoa, E. B.; Ramírez Casillas, R.; Anzaldo Hernández, J.; Rosales-Rivera, L. C.; Soltero-Martínez, J. F. A.; García-Enriquez, S.; Macías-Balleza, E. R. Optimization of the obtaining of cellulose nanocrystals from Agave tequilana Weber var. Azul Bagasse by acid hydrolysis. Nanomaterials 2021, 11(2), 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. ASTM C109/C109M-21; Standard; Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars. American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021.
  40. ASTM C778-21; Standard Specification for Standard Sand. American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021.
  41. Gallardo-Sánchez, M. A.; Hernández, J. A.; Casillas, R. R.; Vázquez, J. I. E.; Hernández, D. E.; Martínez, J. F. A. S.; García-Enriquez, S.; Balleza, E. R. M. Obtaining Soluble-grade cellulose pulp from Agave tequilana Weber var. Azul Bagasse. BioResources 2019, 14(4), 9867–9881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. TAPPI T236 om-22; Kappa Number of Pulp. STANDARD by Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry. Tappi Press: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2022.
  43. Viscosity of Pulp (Capillary Viscometer Method). TAPPI T230 om-19; Viscosity of Pulp (Capillary Viscometer Method). STANDARD by Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry. Tappi Press: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2019.
  44. STANDARD by Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry. TAPPI T 203; Alpha-, Beta- and Gamma-Cellulose in Pulp. STANDARD by Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry. Tappi Press: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2022.
  45. Saucedo-Salazar, E. M.; Perera-Mercado, Y. A.; Schott-Martínez, J. A.; García-Rodríguez, S. P.; Saucedo-Morales, J. L.; Ceniceros-Reyes, M. A.; Barriga-Castro, E. D. Characterization Of Silica Nanoparticles And Their Effect On Mechanical Properties Of Cement Portland 30R. Acta Microsc. 2015, 24(1), 16–20. [Google Scholar]
  46. Coutts, R. S. A review of Australian research into natural fibre cement composites. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2005, 27(5), 518–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mohammadkazemi, F.; Doosthoseini, K.; Ganjian, E.; Azin, M. Manufacturing of bacterial nano-cellulose reinforced fiber− cement composites. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 101, 958–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chung, D. D. L. Interface engineering for cement-matrix composites. Compos. Interfaces 2000, 8(1), 67–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Riva, G. H.; Silva, J. A.; Navarro, F.; López-Dellamary, F.; Robledo, J. R. Síntesis de nanocompuestos de celulosa para aplicaciones biomédicas en base a sus propiedades mecánicas. Rev. Iberoam. Polímeros 2014, 15, 275–285. [Google Scholar]
  50. Saïd, A. S.; M., A.; Alloin, F.; Paillet, M.; Dufresne, A. Tangling effect in fibrillated cellulose reinforced nanocomposites. Macromolecules 2004, 37(11), 4313–4316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Scrivener, K. L.; Crumbie, A. K.; Laugesen, P. The interfacial transition zone (ITZ) between cement paste and aggregate in concrete. Interface Sci. 2004, 12(4), 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Metalssi, O. O.; Aït-Mokhtar, A.; Ruot, B. Influence of cellulose ether on hydration and carbonation kinetics of mortars. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2014, 49, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Flores, J.; Kamali, M.; Ghahremaninezhad, A. An investigation into the properties and microstructure of cement mixtures modified with cellulose nanocrystal. Materials 2017, 10(5), 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Mehta, P.K.; Monteiro, P.J.M. Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials, 3rd ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  55. Morales-Conde, M. J.; Rubio-de-Hita, P.; Pérez-Gálvez, F. Composite mortars produced with wood waste from demolition: Assessment of new compounds with enhanced thermal properties. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2018, vol. 30(no. 2), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pane, I.; Hansen, W. Investigation of blended cement hydration by isothermal calorimetry and thermal analysis. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005, 35(6), 1155–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Guo, A.; Sun, Z.; Sathitsuksanoh, N.; Feng, H. A review on the application of nanocellulose in cementitious materials. Nanomaterials 2020, 10(12), 2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ma, B.; Ou, Z.; Jian, S.; Xu, R. Influence of cellulose ethers on hydration products of Portland cement. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol.-Mater. Sci. Ed. 2011, 26(3), 588–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Silva, D. A.; Wenk, H. R.; Monteiro, P. J. M. Comparative investigation of mortars from Roman Colosseum and cistern. Thermochim. Acta 2005, 438(1-2), 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhou, Y.; Ding, E. Y.; Li, W. D. Synthesis of TiO2 nanocubes induced by cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) at low temperature. Mater. Lett. 2007, 61(28), 5050–5052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Habert, G.; Choupay, N.; Escadeillas, G.; Guillaume, D.; Montel, J. M. Clay content of argillites: Influence on cement based mortars. Appl. Clay Sci. 2009, 43(3-4), 322–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ledesma, E. F.; Jiménez, J. R.; Fernández, J. M.; Galvín, A. P.; Agrela, F.; Barbudo, A. Properties of masonry mortars manufactured with fine recycled concrete aggregates. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 71, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Smith, D. K.; Jenkins, R. The powder diffraction file: past, present, and future. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 1996, 101(3), 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ardanuy, M.; Claramunt, J.; García-Hortal, J. A.; Barra, M. Fiber-matrix interactions in cement mortar composites reinforced with cellulosic fibers. Cellulose 2011, 18(2), 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Malathy, R.; Rajagopal S., S. R.; Prakash, A. R.; Das, B. B.; Chung, I. M.; Kim, S. H.; Prabakaran, M. Use of industrial silica sand as a fine aggregate in concrete—an explorative study. Buildings 2022, 12(8), 1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Anju, T. R.; Ramamurthy, K.; Dhamodharan, R. Surface modified microcrystalline cellulose from cotton as a potential mineral admixture in cement mortar composite. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2016, 74, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kafi, M. A.; Sadeghi-Nik, A.; Bahari, A.; Sadeghi-Nik, A.; Mirshafiei, E. Microstructural characterization and mechanical properties of cementitious mortar containing montmorillonite nanoparticles. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2016, 28(12), 04016155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kocak, Y. Effects of metakaolin on the hydration development of Portland–composite cement. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 31, 101419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kumar, S.; Ali, N.; Begum, S.; Rahman, Z. Characterization, properties and microstructure studies of cement mortar incorporating nano-SiO2. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 37, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Horgnies, M.; Willieme, P.; Gabet, O. Influence of the surface properties of concrete on the adhesion of coating: Characterization of the interface by peel test and FT-IR spectroscopy. Prog. Org. Coat. 2011, 72(3), 360–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Horgnies, M.; Chen, J. J.; Bouillon, C. Overview about the use of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy to study cementitious materials. WIT Trans. Eng. Sci. 2013, 77, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Barnett, S. J.; MacPhee, D. E.; Lachowski, E. E.; Crammond, N. J. XRD, EDX and IR analysis of solid solutions between thaumasite and ettringite. Cem. Concr. Res. 2002, 32(5), 719–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hanna, R. A.; Barrie, P. J.; Cheeseman, C. R.; Hills, C. D.; Buchler, P. M.; Perry, R. Solid state 29Si and 27Al NMR and FTIR study of cement pastes containing industrial wastes and organics. Cem. Concr. Res. 1995, 25(7), 1435–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Mendes, A.; Gates, W. P.; Sanjayan, J. G.; Collins, F. NMR, XRD, IR and synchrotron NEXAFS spectroscopic studies of OPC and OPC/slag cement paste hydrates. Mater. Struct. 2011, 44(10), 1773–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Fernandez-Carrasco, L.; Claramunt, J.; Ardanuy, M. Autoclaved cellulose fibers reinforced cement: Effects of silica fume. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 66, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Chollet, M.; Horgnies, M. Analyses of the surfaces of concrete by Raman and FT-IR spectroscopies: comparative study of hardened samples after demoulding and after organic post-treatment. Surf. Interface Anal. 2011, 43(3), 714–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Biricik, H.; Sarier, N. Comparative study of the characteristics of nano silica-, silica fume-and fly ash-incorporated cement mortars. Mater. Res. 2014, 17(3), 570–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Mollah, M. Y. A.; Yu, W.; Schennach, R.; Cocke, D. L. A Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic investigation of the early hydration of Portland cement and the influence of sodium lignosulfonate. Cem. Concr. Res. 2000, 30(2), 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mejdoub, R.; Hammi, H.; Suñol, J. J.; Khitouni, M.; M ‘nif, A.; Boufi, S. Nanofibrillated cellulose as nonreinforcement in Portland cement: Thermal, mechanical and microstructural properties. J. Compos. Mater. 2017, 51(17), 2491–2503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Maravelaki-Kalaitzaki, P.; Agioutantis, Z.; Lionakis, E.; Stavroulaki, M.; Perdikatsis, V. Physico-chemical and mechanical characterization of hydraulic mortars containing nano-titania for restoration applications. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2013, 36, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Li, G. Y.; Wang, P. M.; Zhao, X. Mechanical behavior and microstructure of cement composites incorporating surface-treated multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2005, 43(6), 1239–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chen, Y.; Zou, C.; Mastalerz, M.; Hu, S.; Gasaway, C.; Tao, X. Applications of micro-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) in the geological sciences—a review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16(12), 30223–30250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. George, M.; Montemagno, C. Estimation of the sulfur ester content of cellulose nanocrystals prepared by sulfuric acid hydrolysis: a reproducible and fast infrared method. Wood Sci. Technol. 2017, 51(3), 535–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Gu, J.; Catchmark, J. M.; Kaiser, E. Q.; Archibald, D. D. Quantification of cellulose nanowhiskers sulfate esterification levels. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 92(2), 1809–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Lin, N.; Dufresne, A. Surface chemistry, morphological analysis and properties of cellulose nanocrystals with gradiented sulfation degrees. Nanoscale 2014, 6(10), 5384–5393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Yu, P.; Kirkpatrick, R. J.; Poe, B.; McMillan, P. F.; Cong, X. Structure of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H): Near-, Mid-, and Far-infrared spectroscopy. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1999, 82(3), 742–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Richardson, I. G. The calcium silicate hydrates. Cem. Concr. Res. 2008, 38(2), 137–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Compressive strength (a,c) and flexural strength (b,d) of mortars as a function of CNC content. Hollow symbols represent the experimental data for CNC S and CNC H, full symbols correspond to average of both types of CNC; solid and dotted lines represent the fitted curves.
Figure 1. Compressive strength (a,c) and flexural strength (b,d) of mortars as a function of CNC content. Hollow symbols represent the experimental data for CNC S and CNC H, full symbols correspond to average of both types of CNC; solid and dotted lines represent the fitted curves.
Preprints 230025 g001
Figure 2. Representative SEM micrographs of mortars containing CNC S and CNC H at different CNC concentrations. Selected microstructural features, including microcracks and the interfacial transition zone (ITZ), are indicated.
Figure 2. Representative SEM micrographs of mortars containing CNC S and CNC H at different CNC concentrations. Selected microstructural features, including microcracks and the interfacial transition zone (ITZ), are indicated.
Preprints 230025 g002
Figure 3. Average microcrack width (W), microcrack length (L), and interfacial transition zone (ITZ) thickness of mortars containing CNC S and CNC H as a function of CNC content. Values represent mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 3. Average microcrack width (W), microcrack length (L), and interfacial transition zone (ITZ) thickness of mortars containing CNC S and CNC H as a function of CNC content. Values represent mean ± standard deviation.
Preprints 230025 g003
Figure 4. TGA curves of mortars containing CNC S and CNC H as a function of CNC content.
Figure 4. TGA curves of mortars containing CNC S and CNC H as a function of CNC content.
Preprints 230025 g004
Figure 5. DOH of the mortars as a function of the amount of CNC.
Figure 5. DOH of the mortars as a function of the amount of CNC.
Preprints 230025 g005
Figure 6. Reported temperature ranges associated with the main thermal processes of cementitious phases and cellulose nanocrystals [3,30,55,57,58,59,60,61].
Figure 6. Reported temperature ranges associated with the main thermal processes of cementitious phases and cellulose nanocrystals [3,30,55,57,58,59,60,61].
Preprints 230025 g006
Figure 7. CBW and PBW for mortars with CNC S and CNC H.
Figure 7. CBW and PBW for mortars with CNC S and CNC H.
Preprints 230025 g007
Figure 8. DTG curves of mortars containing CNC S as a function of temperature.
Figure 8. DTG curves of mortars containing CNC S as a function of temperature.
Preprints 230025 g008
Figure 9. Peak area of the weight loss derivative as a function of CNC concentration for mortars containing CNC S and CNC H.
Figure 9. Peak area of the weight loss derivative as a function of CNC concentration for mortars containing CNC S and CNC H.
Preprints 230025 g009
Figure 10. Diffractograms of the mortars containing CNC S (MS), CNC H (MH), and the blank reference (M0).
Figure 10. Diffractograms of the mortars containing CNC S (MS), CNC H (MH), and the blank reference (M0).
Preprints 230025 g010
Figure 11. FTIR spectra of mortars containing CNC H and CNC S as a function of CNC concentration.
Figure 11. FTIR spectra of mortars containing CNC H and CNC S as a function of CNC concentration.
Preprints 230025 g011
Table 1. Values obtained by fitting the data from Figure 1c and Figure 1d to Equation 1.
Table 1. Values obtained by fitting the data from Figure 1c and Figure 1d to Equation 1.
M+CNC H M+CNC S Average M+ CNC H M+CNC S Average
y0 22.2 ± 1.41 25.84 ± 0.63 22.9 5.63 5.63 5.63
xc 0.61 ± 0.03 0.35 0.55 ± 0.03 0.71 ± 0.026 0.34 ± 0.036 0.62 ± 0.04
w 0.38 ± 0.08 0.14 ± 0.05 0.35 ± 0.05 0.34 ± 0.03 0.25 ± 0.05 0.37 ± 0.04
A 8.54 ± 1.29 5.10 7.52 ± 0.94 1.96 ± 0.14 1.33 ± 0.17 1.36 ± 0.09
R2 0.9468 0.5754 0.8825 0.8415 0.9853 0.96038
y0 22.2 ± 1.41 25.84 ± 0.63 22.9 5.63 5.63 5.63
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.