Submitted:
25 August 2026
Posted:
27 August 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
The Lycoris aurea (L’Hér.) Herb. complex—valued for its medicinal properties and horticultural applications—is characterized by extensive intraspecific dysploidy. However, a comprehensive molecular cytogenetic framework elucidating intraspecific karyotypic differentiation and the underlying evolutionary mechanisms has yet to be established. By integrating fluorochrome banding with 5S and 45S rDNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), we performed a comparative molecular cytogenetic karyotyping of 20 natural populations spanning 13 provinces in China and synthesized these results with previously published cytogenetic data to conduct a rigorous cytogeographic assessment of this species. Three distinct cytotypes were identified: cytotype A (2n = 14 = 8m + 6t/st), cytotype B (2n = 15 = 7m + 8t/st), and cytotype C (2n = 16 = 6m + 10t/st). Both multivariate karyomorphometric analyses and comparison of DAPI banding and rDNA FISH patterns revealed minimal inter-population karyotypic variation in cytotype A but pronounced intra-cytotypic karyotypic polymorphism in cytotype C. Integrated cytogenetic evidence supports Robertsonian translocation as the primary mechanism driving dysploidy in the L. aurea complex: cytotype C is inferred as the ancestral karyotype, from which cytotype A arose through double Robertsonian fusions and cytotype B through a single such fusion, establishing two parallel, evolutionarily independent lineages. The parapatric partitioning of the three cytotypes is interpreted as the outcome of synergistic effects among Quaternary climatic oscillations, topographic barriers, and ecological niche divergence.
Keywords:
Lycoris aurea
; intraspecific variation
; karyotype
; dysploidy
; ribosomal DNA (rDNA)
; fluorochrome banding
; fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)
; cytogeography
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.