Submitted:
05 August 2026
Posted:
05 August 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Characterization
2.2. Modeling of Sisal Residue Production (Pulp and Broken Fiber)
2.3. Field Test Using Rates of Sisal Residue
2.4. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Modeling of Sisal Residue Production (Pulp and Broken Fiber)
3.2. Field Test Using Rates of Sisal Residue
| Sisal residue, L vase-1 | Weight of plant | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Plant | Shoot | Roots | |
| 0 | 100% | 14.5% | 85.5% |
| 2 | 100% | 7.1% | 92.9% |
| 4 | 100% | 9.5% | 90.5% |
| 6 | 100% | 6.8% | 93.2% |
| 8 | 100% | 8.4% | 91.6% |
| 10 | 100% | 8.6% | 91.4% |
| 12 | 100% | 9.1% | 90.9% |
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Aponte, G. Panorama internacional de la economía circular a través del análisis de la producción científica y tecnológica. Tekhné 2022, 25, 13–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muthangya, M.; Mshandete, A.M.; Kivaisi, A.k. Two-Stage Fungal Pre-Treatment for Improved Biogas Production from Sisal Leaf Decortication Residues. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 4805–4815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abhinav, K.S.; Manjinder, S.; Sachin, K.; Akshaykurmar, C.; Arjun, S.; Chaudhari, A.K.M.; Gaurav, M. Eco-friendly sisal, basalt, and recycled nylon fibers-reinforced polypropylene composites: A step towards sustainable developments. Next Mater. 2025, 5, 100906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teixeira, L.P.; Pires-Oliveira, J.C.; Portal-Gomes, P.W.; et al. Biodiversity at Risk: Climate Change Impacts on Brazil’s Semiarid Caatinga Flora. Earth Syst. Env. 2026, 10, 4603–4618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferraz-Almeida, R.; Ribeiro Ferreira da Silva, O.R. Sisal Fiber (Agave sisalana) Production in the Brazilian Semiarid from 1988 to 2024. J. Nat. Fibers 2025, 22(1). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahigi, N.S.; Mkunda, J.J.; Mwema, M. F.; Machunda, R.A. A Comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment of SisalYarn Production: Unveiling Sustainability and Resource Optimization Hotspots. Environ. Chall. 2025, 18, 101085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muthangya, M.; Mshandete, A.M.; Kivaisi, A.k. Two-Stage Fungal Pre-Treatment for Improved Biogas Production from Sisal Leaf Decortication Residues. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 4805–4815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Terrapon-Pfaff, J.C.; Fischedick, M.; Monheim, H. Energy potentials and sustainability—the case of sisal residues in Tanzania. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2019, 16, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferraz-Almeida, R.; Oliveira, A.R.; Pinheiro, C.J.; Oliveira, J.L.; Almeida, V.F.; Arruda, E.M. Potential of Sisal (Agave sisalana) Residues for Improving Sisal Plant Growth and Soil Residue Stocks in Bahia’s Circular Agriculture. Agronomy-Basel 2025, 15, 1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colley, T.A.; Valerian, J.; Hauschild, M.Z.; Olsen, S.I.; Birkved, M. Addressing Nutrient Depletion inTanzanian Sisal Fiber Production Using Life Cycle Assessment and Circular Economy Principles, with BioenergyCo-Production. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdalla, J.A.; Hawileh, R.A.; Bahurudeen, A.; Jyothsna, G.; Sofi, A.; Vigneshwaran, S.; Thomas, B.S. Comprehensive Review on the Use of Natural Fibers in Cement/Geopolymer Concrete: A Step Towards Sustainability. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2023, 19, e02244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holanda, J.S.; Torres, J.F.; Santos, Z.L.; Lima, G.F.C.; Carvalho Filho, J.V. Processamento deresíduos de sisal e avaliação nutricional na alimentação de caprinos. Congresso Internacional de Fibras Naturais, Salvador, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Cantalino, A.; Torres, E.A.; Silva, M.S. Sustainability of Sisal Cultivation in Brazil Using Co-Products and Wastes. J. Agric. Sci. 2015, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, M.G.; Garcia, K.G.V.; Mattos, A.L.A.; et al. Reduction of Cd2+ and Pb2+ Bioavailability in Contaminated Soil Treated with Sisal Residues (Agave sisalana). Water Air Soil Pollut. 2023, 234, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lima, P.R.L.; Santos, R.S.; Ferreira, S.R.; Toledo Filho, R.D. Characterization and treatment of sisal fiber residues for cement-based composite application. Eng. Agríc. J. 2014, 34, 812–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Sisal. 2023. Available online: https://www.fao.org/economic/futurefibres/fibres/sisal/en (accessed on 29 march 2026).
- Yamoah, C. F.; Bationo, A.; Shapiro, B. Trend and stability analyses of millet yields treated with fertilizer and crop residues in the Sahel. Field Crops Res. 2002, 75, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Q.Q.; Tan, S.B.; Xi, J.M.; Xi, J.G.; Li, L.; Wang, H.; Zhang, J.; Yi, K.X. Effect of different levels of potassium on growth and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of sisal under the background of straw returning. Chin. J. Trop. Crops 2017, 38, 1005–1009. [Google Scholar]
- IBGE - Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. SIDRA plataforma: Sisal. Available online: https://sidra.ibge.gov.br/tabela/5457 (accessed on 10 April 2024).
- TSB - Tanzania Sisal Board, Tanga. 2009. Available online: http://www.tsbtz.org/Statistics.html (accessed on 10 April 2024).
- GTZ - Agro-industrial biogas in Kenya Potentials, Estimates for Tariffs, Policy and Business Recommendations; German Technical Cooperation: Berlin, 2010.
- Almeida, R.F.; Silveira, C.H.; Mota, R.P.; Moitinho, M.; Arruda, E.M.; Mendonça, E.D.S.; La Scala, N.; Wendling, B. For how long does the quality and quantity of residues in the soil affect the carbon compartments and CO2-C emissions? J. Soils Sediments 2016, 16, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, N.; Sun, L.; Lu, T.; Zhang, X.; Duan, N.; Wang, W.; Liang, X.; Fan, Y.; Liu, H. Effects of Adding Different Corn Residue Components on Soil and Aggregate Organic Carbon. Agriculture 2025, 15, 1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, Y.; Zhou, M.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, G.; Jin, J.; Ding, G.; Zeng, X.; Liu, X. Crop Residue Return Rather Than Organic Manure Increases Soil Aggregate Stability under Corn–Soybean Rotation in Surface Mollisols. Agriculture 2022, 12, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, H.; Cheng, J.; Han, M.; Zhang, H. Effect of Tillage and Residue-Returning Mode on Soil Carbon Mineralizability and Accumulation in a Wheat–Maize System. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Yang, S.; Gao, J.; Chen, L.; Ning, H.; Hu, Z.; Lu, J.; Tan, X.; Zeng, Y.; Pan, X.; Zeng, Y. Long-term straw return with reducing chemical fertilizers application improves soil nitrogen mineralization in a double rice-cropping system. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baloch, S.B.; Ali, S.; Bernas, J.; et al. Crop Residue Management for Soil Health and Environmental Sustainability: A Comprehensive Review. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2025, 25, 7808–7828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Fan, Y.F.; Sun, J.Y.; Gao, J.L.; Wang, Z.G.; Yu, X.F. Effects of straw return with potassium fertilizer on the stem lodging resistance, grain quality and yield of spring maize (Zea mays L.). Sci. Report. 2023, 13, 20307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ballerini, D.; Desmarquest, J.P.; Pourquie, J. Ethanol production from lignocellulosics: Large scale experimentation and economics. Bioresour. Technol. 1994, 5, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, G.; Huang, X.; Wu, M.; Huang, C.; Qin, X.; Jiang, Y.; Peng, X.; Zhong, J.; Chen, T.; Chen, L. Effects of long-term sisal residue returning on soil physiochemistry, microbial community, and sisal yield. Bragantia 2024, 83, e20240057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]






| Soil residue, L vase-1 | Size of plant, cm/plant | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant | Shoot | Roots | ||
| 0 | 33.3 B | 16.6 C | 16.6 | |
| 2 | 63.3 A | 29.7 AB | 33.6 | |
| 4 | 67.2 A | 29.4 AB | 37.8 | |
| 6 | 64.9 A | 32.3 A | 32.7 | |
| 8 | 68.2 A | 31.6 A | 36.7 | |
| 10 | 55.2 A | 27.2 B | 28.0 | |
| 12 | 64.3 A | 31.1 AB | 33.2 | |
| ANOVA | ||||
| P value | <0.1 | <0.1 | 0,10Ns | |
| Coefficient of variation | 17.9 | 9.5 | 26,3 | |
| Soil residue, L vase-1 | Sisal leaves | |||
| Number/plant | Thickness, mm/leaf | |||
| 0 | 8.0 E | 19.9 E | ||
| 2 | 12.0 D | 30.4 CD | ||
| 4 | 15.0 AB | 33.1 BC | ||
| 6 | 14.0 BCD | 32.3 CD | ||
| 8 | 15.0 AB | 36.7 AB | ||
| 10 | 12.0 CD | 29.0 D | ||
| 12 | 17.0 A | 37.4 A | ||
| ANOVA | ||||
| P value | <0.1 | <0.1 | ||
| Coefficient of variation | 14.9 | 8.42 | ||
| Sisal residue, L vase-1 | Weight of plant, g/plant | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Plant | Shoot | Roots | |
| 0 | 29.7 C | 4.3 D | 25.4 D |
| 2 | 139.1 B | 9.9 C | 129.2 C |
| 4 | 209.0 A | 19.8 AB | 189.3 AB |
| 6 | 155.3 B | 10.5 C | 144.9 BC |
| 8 | 206.9 A | 17.3 B | 189.7 AB |
| 10 | 133.2 B | 11.5 C | 121.7 C |
| 12 | 247.4 A | 22.4 A | 225.0 A |
| ANOVA | |||
| P value | <0.1* | <0.1* | <0.1* |
| Coefficient of variation | 21.2 | 23.8 | 21.9 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).