Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Virulence Survey of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici in Russia During 2024 – 2025

Submitted:

22 July 2026

Posted:

24 July 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Yellow (stripe) rust, caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici (Pst), is a devastating disease of common wheat worldwide. Virulence variability of Pst isolates from common wheat was studied in geographically distant Russian regions (the North Caucasus, North-West, Volga, Ural), which differ in climatic and environmental conditions, types of cultivated wheat (winter vs. spring wheat), and genotypes of commercial cultivars. A total of 95 isolates were tested for virulence on a differential set comprising 12 Avocet near-isogenic lines and 15 supplemental wheat varieties. No virulence was detected to Yr5, Yr10, Yr15, Yr24, and variety Moro. Isolates virulent to Yr17 were identified in the North Caucasus (Dagestan, Krasnodar, Rostov) and Ural; however, no virulence to Yr17 was observed in the North-West and Volga regions. In total, 38 distinct Pst pathotypes were identified: seven of them were detected in two regions, while a single pathotype was shared by three regions. Most pathotypes from the North Caucasus and North West were clearly distinct from pathotypes in the Volga and Ural regions. The regional Pst collections were clearly divided into two major clusters: the first comprising the North-West and North-Caucasian collections (Dagestan, Krasnodar, Rostov), and the second comprising the Volga and Ural collections.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Pathogenic fungus Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici (Pst) causes one of the most important wheat diseases worldwide called yellow rust (Yr) or stripe rust. The Pst pathogen evolves rapidly, and its populations are characterized by substantial genetic variability in both virulence and pathotype composition [1]. The use of resistant cultivars is an environmentally safe and effective strategy for controlling this disease. To ensure successful genetic protection, there is a need in information on both the effectiveness of resistance genes and variability of the pathogen, and the corresponding studies have been conducted in many parts of the world, including Russia [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10].
Eighteen genetic lineages (race groups) of Pst have been recognized by the Global Rust Reference Center (GRRC) across the world [3,10]. First aggressive races PstS1 and PstS2, adapted to high temperatures, were first detected in North Africa in the 1980s and triggered widespread yellow rust epiphytotics across multiple continents in the 2000s [11]. Though abundances of PstS1 and PstS2 declined substantially in the subsequent period due to displacement by novel virulent races, both the lineages persist regionally. Notably, PstS2 was detected in Azerbaijan and Ukraine in the mid-2010s [2,12], and later since 2020, it has been recorded in Russia (North-West and Dagestan) [13,14].
The European Pst population was predominantly clonal before 2011, with sexual recombination playing a minor role [10,15]. Races belonging to lineage PstS0 were prevalent. New virulent strains thus emerged through stepwise mutations within these clonal lineages [16,17]. Newly occurred races belonging to lineages PstS7 (Warrior), PstS8 (Kranich), PstS10 and PstS13 (Triticale aggressive) caused severe yellow rust epiphytotics in Europe during the 2010s [18,19,20]. These lineages spread rapidly across different parts of Europe modifying structure of regional Pst populations and causing severe epidemics on wheat varieties that had previously been resistant.
Outside Europe, similar structural changes of Pst populations and a tendency of disease severity increase have also been reported not only in neighboring regions (e.g., North Africa) but also far away from Europe, confirming the high evolutionary potential and dispersal ability of the pathogen [20,21,22]. According to the Global Rust Reference Center (GRRC) survey [2], the highly prevalent across Europe PstS10 race group has also been recorded in South America, and its presence was confirmed in Australia since 2018 [23]. Within the European PstS10 lineage, at least four races have been identified, each adapted to locally grown wheat cultivars [2]. It is hypothesized that the PstS10 lineage arose through somatic hybridization and nuclear reassortment involving co-occurring parental isolates from the PstS0 and PstS7 lineages [10].
A distinct clade related to the PstS10 race group predominated in Serbia during the 2022/2023 growing season, whereas the Warrior lineage (PstS7) had been more widespread in 2016 [24]. PstS13 was prevalent in several South American countries, where it was first detected in 2017. In 2022, it was recorded for the first time in North Africa (Tunisia). In Europe, PstS13 was mainly found on triticale, but durum wheat, rye, spelt, and bread wheat were also affected. It has become one of the most widespread races in Australia [23]. The newly designated genetic group, PstS17, was first detected in East Africa (Ethiopia), although it had already been widespread in the Middle East since 2018. In 2021–2022, this group was also detected in the Baltic states, which border the north-western part of Russia. The PstS17 group comprises two subgroups: Pst17 and Pst17v10. Isolates belonging to this group are avirulent to Avocet lines carrying Yr1, Yr3, Yr4, Yr5, Yr15, Yr25, and Yr27, but virulent to Yr2, Yr6, Yr7, Yr8, Yr17, Yr32, YrSp (Spalding Prolific), Avocet S (AvS), and Ambition (Amb). The two subgroups differ in their virulence to Yr10 and Yr24 (Pst17v10) [2].
The emergence of novel Pst races can rapidly alter disease pressure and provoke widespread epidemics, even in areas where resistant cultivars had previously provided effective control. Races with virulence to the widely deployed resistance gene Yr5 have been reported in Turkey, posing a significant threat to wheat production [25]. The Yr15 resistance gene, introduced into European wheat breeding programs in the late 1990s, is now widely present in modern cultivars. Until recently, virulence to Yr15 was considered exceptionally rare. Among thousands of yellow rust accessions submitted to the GRRC from over 50 countries across six continents, only a single historical case (2002) had previously exhibited this virulence. However, during the 2025 growing season, Yr15 virulence was established in the UK, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, and France. Additional samples from Ireland, Germany, and France indicate further spread across broader areas of Europe [26]. In Russia, Yr15, together with Yr5, Yr10, and Yr24, continues to confer effective protection against yellow rust [8,14]. Nevertheless, none of these genes have been identified in Russian wheat varieties [27].
Yellow rust had long been a regionally important disease of wheat in the North Caucasus, Russia [7]. Since the mid-2010s, its geographical distribution has widened, with regular occurrences in the North-West and sporadic reports from the Central and Central Black Earth regions, the Volga region, and Western Siberia [28,29,30,31]. The disease also remains significant in countries bordering Russia, including Kazakhstan [32,33,34,35], Latvia [36,37], Ukraine [38], Belarus [39] and Azerbaijan [40]. Since 2019, Pst virulence surveys across Russia have been conducted at the All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection. Pathotype characterization was carried out using internationally recognized differentials, namely Avocet near-isogenic lines with Yr genes and differential varieties from both international and European collections. The surveys carried out during 2019–2023 revealed substantial variability within and among Russian Pst populations [14] In the present study, we represent results of Pst monitoring in 2024–2025 in six Russian regions. Our objectives were to (1) assess virulence variability and pathotype composition of Pst collections from geographically distant Russian locations, and (2) compare the pathogen populations across the regions and analyze differentiation among them.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Yellow Rust Sampling

During the 2024–2025 cropping seasons, common wheat leaves displaying Pst uredinia were collected from disease nurseries, breeding plots, and commercial fields across six agroecological regions of Russia: the North Caucasus (Dagestan, Krasnodar, and Rostov), the Middle Volga (Penza), the North-West (St. Petersburg), and the Southern Urals (Chelyabinsk) (Figure 1). During the 2024–2025 wheat growing seasons, severe Pst development was observed in the North Caucasus and North-West regions. In the Volga region, the disease occurred at moderate levels in 2025. In the Southern Urals, yellow rust is atypical wheat disease; until recently, the pathogen had not been detected in this region. Incidental symptoms were first recorded there in 2024 within wheat breeding nurseries. In 2025, disease development increased substantially, reaching 30–50% on susceptible varieties. The North Caucasus is a winter wheat-growing zone. In the North-West, both winter and spring wheat are cultivated, whereas spring wheat predominates in the Volga region and the Southern Urals [41].
In total, 14 Pst samples were collected in Dagestan, 22 in Krasnodar, two in Rostov, three in the Volga region, and eight in the Southern Urals during the 2024 – 2025 growing seasons. All Pst samples were successfully multiplied, and a total of 95 isolates were obtained from the six locations. Typically, one or single uredinial isolates were obtained from each rust sample and tested for infection type. However, for bulk infected leaf samples collected from commercial fields, virulence pathotypes were determined using at least three single-pustule isolates per sample., 95 isolates were obtained during the 2024–2025 growing seasons.
Plant inoculation, pre- and post-inoculation plant growth, and urediniospore collection were performed following standard methods [5,42], with minor modifications [8]. The common winter wheat variety Michigan Amber, which is highly susceptible to yellow rust, was used for the multiplication of Pst samples and obtaining initial isolates. For urediniospore recovery, a 3–5 cm leaf segment bearing uredinia was excised from each sample and incubated in a Petri dish at 3–5 °C, with the basal end wrapped in cotton wool moistened with 0.004% benzimidazole solution. After 1–5 days, pieces of single lesions bearing fresh urediniospores were affixed with plastic film onto 10–12-day-old seedlings of the susceptible wheat variety Michigan Amber. Inoculated plants were kept in a dark dew chamber at 10 °C for 24 h, after which the plastic film was removed and the pots transferred to a growth chamber (MLR-352H, Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) set to 10 °C with a 16:8 h light:dark photoperiod and 70 to 80% relative humidity. Plants inoculated with different isolates were separated after inoculation by placing them in mini-chambers (rectangular cages covered with a plastic sheet) to prevent cross-contamination. First sporulation was typically observed 14–21 days post-inoculation. Urediniospores were harvested 18–20 days after inoculation and then every 4 days until leaf desiccation using a cyclone spore collector. Fresh urediniospores, or those stored at 4 °C for less than two weeks, were subsequently tested on the host differential set [8].

2.2. Virulence Analysis

Pst isolates were characterized on a differential set consisting of 12 wheat lines in the Avocet (Av) spring wheat background (AvYr: 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 17, 24, Sp, 27) and on 15 supplemental wheat differentials. The supplemental set included seven varieties from the world set : Chinese 166, Lee, Heines Kolben, Vilmorin 23, Moro, Strubes Dickkopf, and Suwon 92/Omar and eight varieties from the European set: Hybrid 46, Reichersberg 42, Heines Peko, Nord Desprez, Compair, Carstens V, Spaldings Prolific, and Heines VII. [42]. The Avocet S variety was used as a susceptible control. Urediniospores of a single isolate were suspended in 5 mL of Novec 7100 (mineral oil) to inoculate differentials at the two-leaf stage. Three seedlings of each differential line were used. The entire experiment was conducted twice. After inoculation, plants were incubated in a dark dew chamber at 10 °C for 24 h and transferred to a controlled-climate chamber with the parameters described above. Seedling infection types were scored 20 days post-inoculation based on the original scale proposed by Gassner and Straib, where: 0 = no visible uredia; 0; = necrotic flecks or necrotic areas without sporulation; 1 = necrotic and chlorotic areas with restricted sporulation; 2 = moderate sporulation with necrosis and chlorosis; 3 = sporulation with chlorosis; 4 = abundant sporulation without chlorosis [43]. Infection types 0 to 2 were classified as resistant (pathogen avirulent), and infection types 3 to 4 as susceptible (pathogen virulent).

2.3. Data Analysis

Pst pathotypes, their relative abundances and distribution, and frequencies of virulence to Yr genes or differential genotypes were analyzed.
Analyses of variability within and among the regional Pst collections of isolates were performed separately for isolate and pathotype (clone-corrected) data. Descriptive parameters, such as virulence frequency and relative virulence complexity RVC [44], were calculated for the regional collections and some other groups of isolates.
Dissimilarities between virulence profiles of isolates and pathotypes were calculated with the simple mismatch coefficient (sm) and utilized to analyze structural variability of the Pst collections. The assignment-based KW dispersion within and KB distance between collections were calculated [45,46,47]. The permutation test (1000 random partitions) for differentiation statistics d i f K W (eq. 1 in [48], and [49]) for the KW dispersion (see also eq. 13 in [50], and [47]) was applied to estimate differentiation among the Pst collections and groups of interest.
The effective number of different isolates (ENDI) within a collection was estimated with the metric of functional trait dispersion D T , K W 1 (eqs. 5, 6 in [51] for M = K W , and [52]); Values of ENDI range from 1, if all isolates are identical, to an actual number of isolates when they are absolutely different. To allow for comparison of variability within collections with different numbers of isolates, the normalized version nENDI of this indicator was calculated (corrected eq. 5 in [53]; eq. 3 in [54]); estimates of nENDI belong to [0; 1] interval.
The metric of individual singularity (eqs. 1–3 in [55]; eqs. 1–5 in [56]) was used to discover untypical pathotypes. Singularity of each Pst pathotype was determined based on the sm dissimilarity of that focus pathotype from all other pathotypes in a collection. The singularity of a whole collection in question was calculated for the clone-corrected data as the average singularity of all pathotypes that belong to that collection (eqs. 7–8 in [55]).
The effective number of different Pst collections (ENDC) was calculated according to [57] as D A D W K B 1 metric based the A D W = A D W K B dispersion (Average Distance between collections Within a given set of collections) with regard to the KB distance between collections (only polymorphic virulence loci were included). Values of ENDC range from 1, if all collections are identical, to an actual number of collections when they are absolutely different. The normalized version of this indicator (nENDC) was also calculated to compare different sets of collections; estimates of nENDC belong to [0; 1] interval.
To analyze a congruency of results obtained with the three sets of 12, 15 and 27 differentials, as well as with the original and clone-corrected data (isolates and pathotypes, respectively), the Mantel test was employed for measuring association of relationships between the Pst collections and individuals (isolates or pathotypes). The Mantel test was performed with the corresponding matrices of KB distances between collections and sm dissimilarities between individuals using the MxComp program of the NTSYSpc package, version 2.2 (Exeter Software, Setauket, NY).
UPGMA dendrograms of relationships among the pathotypes in all Pst collections with regard to the simple mismatch dissimilarity between them was generated using the SAHN program of the NTSYSpc package, version 2.2 (Exeter Software, Setauket, NY). The same software was used to construct the UPGMA dendrogram of relationships among the regional Pst collections with regard to the KB distance between them. Other calculations were performed with VIRULENCE ANALYSIS TOOL (VAT) software [58,59] (accessed on July 1 2026) and FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY ANALYSIS TOOLS (FDAT) software (accessed on July 1 2026). Both packages are available at https://en-lifesci.tau.ac.il/profile/kosman (accessed on July 1 2026).

3. Results

In total, virulence profiles of 95 Pst isolates identified in six regions of Russia (Figure 1) with three sets of 12, 15 and 27 differentials each were analyzed. Numbers of tested isolates varied from 6 in the Rostov region to 29 in the Russian North-West (Table 1). Most presented results are based on the set of 27 differentials; this is the default case, and then we don’t mention this fact. Altogether 38 different pathotypes were detected; their virulence profiles are shown in Table S1 (Supplement).

3.1. Virulence and Pathotype Characterization

Virulence to 19 differentials (among 27) was detected at various frequencies (Table 2). No virulence to Yr5, Yr10, Yr15, and Yr24 among the Avocet lines and Moro was found in all isolates tested, whereas Yr6 (Avocet), Lee and Heines Kolben were ineffective against all isolates (Table 2). Very high virulence frequencies in all collections were observed for resistance genes Yr8, Yr9, and Yr27 among the Avocet lines as well as for Suwon 92/Omar, Heines Peko, and Compair. Significant variation in virulence frequency among the regional Pst collections was observed for resistance genes Yr1, Yr7, Yr17, YrSP, and varieties Chinese 166, Vilmorin 23, Strubes Dickkopf, Hybrid 46, Reishesberg 42, Nord Desprez, Carstens V, Spaldings Prolific and Heines VII. Virulence frequencies to Vilmorin 23, Carstens V, and Heines VII were considerably lower for Pst collections from the Volga and Ural regions. All isolates from Ural were avirulent to AvYrSp and Spaldings Prolific, whereas most isolates from other regions exhibited higher virulence frequencies on those differentials. Isolates virulent to Yr17 were identified in the North Caucasus (Dagestan, Krasnodar, and Rostov) and Ural regions; however, no virulence on Yr17 was observed in the North-West and Volga collections.
Eight Pst pathotypes (among 38 in total) were identified in two (7) and three (1) regions (Table 1 and Table 3). All but one of these pathotypes originated from North Caucasus (Dagestan, Krasnodar and Rostov regions), whereas only one common pathotype in the Dagestan, Krasnodar and North-West regions (p4, Table 3) was found outside the North Caucasus area. None of the pathotypes in the Volga and Ural Pst collections was shared with any other region.
The average relative virulence complexity of Pst isolates was similar in the Dagestan, Krasnodar and North-West regions (average RVC = 0.63 ÷ 0.66, 17 ÷ 18 virulences of 27; Table 3) and higher than in other three regions; however, the range of RVC for individual isolates was much higher in the North-West collection (0.44 – 0.70). The lowest average RVC = 0.45 (around 12 virulences) with very narrow range for individual isolates (0.41 – 0.48) was in the Ural region. For a pool of all Russian isolates, the average RVC was 0.62 (around 17 virulences) with a range 0.41 – 0.74 (Table 3).
The average singularity of pathotypes was highest in the Ural region (14.4; Table 3), whereas similar singularity estimates (8.33 ÷ 8.72) in the North Caucasian regions (Dagestan, Krasnodar and Rostov) were the lowest ones. Three most singular pathotypes p17, p28 and p26 with singularities 15.30, 15.06 and 14.40 belonged to the Ural (p17 and p28) and North-West collections (virulence profiles of these pathotypes are shown in Table S1, Supplement). For a pool of all Russian pathotypes, the average singularity was 9.48 (Table 3).

3.2. Relationships Among the Pst Pathotypes

The UPGMA dendrogram generated with the simple mismatch dissimilarities between pathotypes (Figure 2) demonstrated a clear separation of most North-Caucasian (Dagestan, Krasnodar and Rostov) and North-Western Pst pathotypes from those in the Volga and Ural regions (with only a couple exceptions). Moreover, the former group can be further subdivided into four clusters: (i) closely related pathotypes from the Krasnodar, Rostov and North-West regions; (ii) two different subgroups of the Dagestan and Krasnodar pathotypes; and (iii) a subgroup that mainly consists of pathotypes from the North-West collection. Such subdivision is a result of existing 2 - 3 distinct subgroups of Pst pathotypes within each of the Dagestan, Krasnodar and North-West collection (Figure S1, Supplement) and relatively close similarity of several pathotypes from those regional subgroups.

3.3. Variability Within and Among Pst Collections

The highest and smallest estimates of variability within the Pst isolate collections were obtained in the North-West and Rostov regions, respectively, for both the KW dispersion and the normalized effective number of different isolates (KW = 0.220 and 0.049, nENDI = 0.198 and 0.043, respectively; Table 4 for 27 differentials).
The most similar were Pst collections from the Dagestan and Krasnodar regions (KB = 0.082; Table 5 for 27 differentials), and the hypothesis of pairwise differentiation between them based on d i f K W was rejected at p > 0.05 level. All other pairwise comparisons revealed statistically significant differentiation between the corresponding regional Pst collections (p < 0.01) with the largest distance between the easternmost Ural and westernmost North-West regions (KB = 0.304). Moreover, both the Volga and Ural collections strongly differed from the North-Caucasian (Dagestan, Krasnodar, Rostov) and North-Western ones with the KB distances in a range from 0.236 to 0.304 (Table 5). Note, the KB distances between the North-West Pst collection and two North-Caucasian (Dagestan and Krasnodar) ones were about two times smaller than between the former and the Volga collection (KB = 0.112 and 0.131 vs 0.236; Table 5) despite the North-West region is much more distant geographically from the collection sites in North Caucasus than from those in the Volga region (air distances 1,800 km (Krasnodar) and 2,200 km (Dagestan) vs 900-1200 km).
Effective numbers of different Pst collections (ENDC) equal 2.52 and 2.53 of the 6 original ones for the isolate and clone-corrected (pathotype) data, respectively. This means that the spatial heterogeneity of the overall Russian Pst collection represented by the six regional ones is at moderate level with nENDC = 0.304 and 0.306 based on the isolate and pathotype data, respectively. The extent of heterogeneity of the North-Caucasian Pst collection (Dagestan, Krasnodar and Rostov) was much lower with ENDC = 1.41 (of 3 reginal collections) and nENDC = 0.205, though the spatial differentiation still existed there.

3.4. Relationships between Pst Collections

The UPGMA dendrogram generated with the KB distances clearly divided the regional Pst collections into two groups: (i) the North-West and North-Caucasian (Dagestan, Krasnodar and Rostov) collections; and (ii) the Volga and Ural collections (Figure 3a). Note, the Pst collections from Dagestan and Krasnodar regions were more similar to that from the geographically distant North-West region (air distances are about 2,000 km) than to the collection from the neighboring Rostov region.

3.5. Comparison of Results for Various Sets of Differentials

The results obtained with the entire set of 27 differentials differed to some extent from those for its two components: 12 near-isogenic Avocet lines and 15 ‘old’ wheat differentials that possess a few Yr resistance genes (Table 2). Variability within the regional collections estimated based on the Avocet lines (e.g., nENDI values; Table 4) was generally smaller than the corresponding estimates obtained with the sets of 15 and 27 differentials (the only exception is the Rostov Pst collection). More importantly, there were multiple qualitative disagreements in the rank order of the corresponding variability estimates. For example, based on the 12 differentials, nENDI within the Dagestan collection was larger than for the Ural one (0.106 vs 0.090; Table 4), whereas the opposite was established with the 27 differentials (0.127 vs 0.174); similar situation was when comparing the Krasnodar and North-West regions with nENDI = 0.174 vs 0.133, and nENDI = 0.185 vs 0.198 for the sets of 12 and 27 differentials, respectively (Table 4).
The pairwise KB distances between the regional collections estimated based on the 12 Avocet lines were smaller than those obtained with the whole set of 27 differentials (Table 5). For example, the North-West collection was much more similar to the Dagestan one for the set of 12 differentials (KB = 0.076 vs 0.112); moreover, these two Pst collections from the North-West and Dagestan were statistically different for the 27 differentials, whereas they were statistically indistinguishable when analyzed with the set of 12 differentials (Table 5). The latter facts resulted in slightly different UPGMA dendrograms of relationships between the regional Pst collections with the North-West collection being more closely related to the Dagestan one for the 12 Avocet differentials (Figure 3).
An extent of differentiation among all six regional Pst collections in terms of the normalized effective number of different collections was also varied considerably depending on the differential set used: nENDC = 0.218, 0.347 and 0.304 for the isolate data with the sets of 12, 15 and 27 differential lines, respectively; very similar nENDC estimates were obtained for the clone-corrected (pathotype) data.

4. Discussion

In this study, we characterized Pst samples collected from common wheat in 2024–2025 across the European part of Russia: the North-West region (NW, Saint Petersburg), three neighboring regions in North Caucasus (Dagestan, D; Krasnodar, Kr; Rostov, R), the Middle Volga region (V, Penza), and the Southern Ural region (U, Chelyabinsk) that is situated at the boundary between Europe and Asia. Winter wheat dominates in the North Caucasian regions, while spring wheat prevails in Ural. Both winter and spring wheats are grown in the North-West and Volga regions [41].
Using the set of 27 differentials (12 Avocet near-isogenic lines and 15 additional wheat differentials), thirty-eight Pst pathotypes were identified among 95 isolates with sixteen of them being singletons (were detected only in a single isolate). Many pathotypes were closely related differing only by a single v/a reaction in their virulence profiles. In the Russian Pst survey of 2019-2021 [4], seventy-nine virulence pathotypes among 117 isolates were identified based on 20 differentials (12 Avocet lines and 8 supplemental wheat varieties) that reflects considerably larger pathotype richness (number of pathotypes per isolate) comparing with 2024 – 2025. Extremely high estimates of richness and number of singletons in the North-Caucasian Pst population from Krasnodar, Stavropol and Rostov was reported in 2013 – 2018 by Volkova et al. [7]: 182 virulence phenotypes among 186 isolates tested, i.e., almost all pathotypes were singletons. We revealed much lower richness of the Pst collections from the North Caucasus in our annual surveys conducted in 2019-2021 with 34 pathotypes of 50 isolates in total [8], whereas in the present study the richness was even smaller (34 pathotypes of 51 isolates in total). Note, however, the 2013 – 2018 Pst study [7] was performed with 38 differentials that is considerably larger than in our surveys in 2019-2023 and 2024 – 2025 (20 and 27 differentials, respectively) and may potentially result in a relatively larger number of pathotypes detected. Nevertheless, a tendency of decline in pathotype richness in the course of time seems apparent both overall in Russia and in the North Caucasus specifically.
Like in Russia, estimates of the pathotype richness in several Pst collections worldwide were relatively high. Sharma-Poudyal et al. [4] studied 235 isolates from Algeria, Australia, Canada, Chile, China, Hungary, Kenya, Nepal, Pakistan, Russia, Spain, Turkey and Uzbekistan, and identified 129 and 169 virulence phenotypes with 20 single-gene lines and 20 US differentials, respectively. In 2011 and 2013, Pst collections from Saskatchewan and Alberta (Canada) were analyzed by Brar et al. [60]: virulence phenotypes of 59 isolates were differentiated into 33 pathotypes of which 26 were represented by single isolates. In 2017-2019, 62 Pst isolates were studied in Israel with a set of 20 differentials: 32 virulence phenotypes were detected and 30 from them being singletons [61].
All Russian regional Pst collections were significantly divergent from each other except those from Dagestan and Krasnodar. Nevertheless, common pathotypes were found in geographically very distant the North-West and Dagestan regions (around 2,200 km apart) as well as the North-West and Krasnodar ones (1,750 km apart). The presence of shared pathotypes across different locations within the North Caucasus area (Dagestan and Krasnodar, Krasnodar and Rostov) was not surprising and can be explained by relative proximity of these regions, the same epidemiological zone for the pathogen in this territory, and rather similar environmental and climatic conditions. On the other hand, the occurrence of common pathotypes in geographically distant locations, namely the North Caucasus and the North-West, supports the hypothesis of aerial long-distance dispersal of the pathogen from the southern regions of the country to the western European part of Russia either directly or in two steps via Ukraine. Many Pst pathotypes identified in different Russian regions in 2019 – 2021 were also closely related [8].
For virulence profiling and determining the race groups, the following standard set of 19 wheat differentials is used at the GRRC: near-isogenic lines with resistance genes Yr1, Yr2, Yr3, Yr4, Yr5, Yr6, Yr7, Yr8, Yr9, Yr10, Yr15, Yr17, Yr24, Yr25, Yr27, Yr32, and Spaldings Prolific (Sp), Avocet S (AvS), and Ambition (Amb) varieties. In the present study, all but one of these differentials (excluding Ambition) was employed along with several others. Based on the reduced set of 18 differentials (all GRRC differentials except Amb), comparison of the Russian pathotypes detected in 2024–2025 with the race groups identified at GRRC did not reveal any identity between them.
None of the Russian Pst pathotypes could be assigned to one of the PstS race groups defined at GRRC and frequently used for the pathogen classification. However, several pathotypes were closely related to those groups differing from them by up to two v/a reactions in their virulence formula (Table 7). Only two Russian pathotypes differed from the PstS representatives by avirulence to one of the differentials (Table 7a): pathotype p5 ( p 5 ^ in its reduced form on 18 differentials), detected in the Southern Urals, differed from PstS1/2,v27 by avirulence to Yr2, while the North-Western pathotype p30 ( p 30 ^ ) differed from PstS1/2,v3,v27 by avirulence to YrSp. The SCAR markers are applied to identify isolates belonging to the PstS1 and PstS2 groups. Yet, using these markers, we did not detect any characteristic molecular patterns neither in these two pathotypes, nor in other pathotypes from the Ural, Volga, and North-West regions closely related to PstS1/2.
We did not detect Pst isolates related to the race groups PstS10, PstS15, and PstS17 in the North-West region of Russia, though they were previously reported at GRRC in the bordering Baltic countries (Latvia and Estonia) [12]. The PstS10 race group is characterized by avirulence to Yr5, Yr8, Yr10, Yr15, Yr24, and Yr27. The PstS15 race group differs from it by additional virulence to Yr4 (Hybrid 46). By contrast, all isolates from the North-West were virulent to Yr8, and most of them were also virulent to Yr27 and Yr4 with only one and five exceptions, respectively. The PstS17 race group is characterized by a higher number of avirulence alleles (Yr1, Yr3, Yr4, Yr5, Yr9, Yr10, Yr15, Yr24, Yr25, and Yr27) and differed significantly from the North-Western and all other Russian isolates. On the other hand, four pathotypes from the Krasnodar region and another six pathotypes from the whole territory of North Caucasus were closely related to PstS7 and PstS10 (Table 7b) and PstS14 (Table 7c), respectively. Note, the PstS7, PstS10 and PstS14 race groups were associated with Western Europe [2].
Isolates from Azerbaijan collected in the mid-2010s belonged to the race groups PstS0, PstS2, PstS2,v27, and PstS7 (Warrior) according to Hovmøller et al. [12]. Dagestan and Azerbaijan form a single epidemiological zone, and the resistance genes Yr5, Yr15, and Yr24 are effective in both regions. However, despite isolates virulent to Yr10 were first detected in Azerbaijan in 2015, this gene still retains its effectiveness in the Russian North Caucasus. Isolates belonging to the PstS2 race group were recorded in Azerbaijan in 2015–2017 [12]. The PstS2 isolates were later permanently detected in Dagestan since 2021 [62,63]; assignment of those isolates to the PstS2 race group was confirmed using SCAR markers [13,62,63].
Long-term Pst virulence surveys in Russia indicate that Yr5, Yr10, Yr15, and Yr24 retain broad effectiveness against the pathogen, whereas virulence to other Yr genes varies across regions [8,14]. The pathogen structure is very dynamic, reflecting rapid Pst population shifts driven by host-mediated selection. Resistance breeding to yellow rust has traditionally been conducted in the North Caucasus regions of Russia for winter wheat. Molecular marker screening revealed that none of the studied Russian registered varieties carried Yr5, Yr10, Yr15, and Yr24, while Yr9, Yr17 and Yr18 genes and the 1AL.1RS translocation (carrying an uncharacterized Yr-gene) were present in these varieties [64].
Historically, stripe rust was regarded as a disease of cooler and moist temperate regions; however, since 2000, it has appeared in warmer and more arid zones. The Russian Volga and Ural regions are not typical environments for yellow rust development. Isolate collections from these regions differed substantially from those from other regions studied, where yellow rust is a common disease. The Volga and Ural isolates were characterized by a lower virulence complexity (average RVC of isolates) and a higher number of pathotype singletons. These areas are predominantly planted with spring wheat, for which resistance breeding to yellow rust had previously been largely neglected in Russia due to the perceived irrelevance of the disease [27,64].
Though it seems rather obvious that using distinct sets of differentials for virulence analysis (or SSR primers for determining and study of multilocus genotypes) can result in some discrepancy of the corresponding outcomes, this issue is not generally discussed. Comparative studies need to be performed based on a same set of virulence or molecular markers to be the obtained results valid. Nevertheless, even then an evaluation of a specific composition of a selected differential set is particular important when near-isogenic lines are used along with varieties that possess a few resistance genes. This is the case in our research as well as in most virulence studies of the Pst pathogen when the Avocet near-isogenic lines are used together with other wheat varieties. Comparing the results obtained with the set of 12 Avocet differentials versus the complete set of 27 differentials, one can reveal clear differences of relationships between the North-West and Dagestan Pst collections that were statistically indistinguishable and more closely related when analyzed based on the Avocet lines as opposite to the statistically significant differentiation among them for the whole set of differentials (Table 5, Figure 3). A deeper further consideration of accurate ways of virulence data analyses for differential sets that consist of near-isogenic lines and varieties with several (or unknown) resistance genes is needed because for the latter differentials a shared avirulence reaction does not necessarily serve an evidence of similarity of the isolates tested.
High virulence variability observed within the Russian Pst population is unlikely to be driven by a single factor; rather, it appears to result from the interplay of several epidemiological and evolutionary processes. A primary driver seems to be the long-distance dispersal of urediniospores by wind, which facilitates gene flow across vast geographic areas. This mechanism is efficient because of frequent stripe rust outbreaks in countries bordering Russia, including Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Estonia, Ukraine, and Belarus [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]; in the case of epidemic, each such region may serve as an external source of initial inoculum. In addition to aerial dispersal, the year-round survival of the pathogen on volunteer cereals and wild grasses provides a “green bridge” that sustains pathogen populations between growing seasons, promotes local adaptation, and likely contributes to the maintenance of high genetic heterogeneity within regional populations [65]. Another critical factor is the possible role of sexual recombination. The alternate host Berberis spp. is widely distributed in wheat-growing areas of Russia supporting the sexual stage of Pst and generating novel virulence combinations by genetic recombinations [66]. Selection pressure of cultivated wheat varieties also plays important role in shaping the complex and dynamic virulence landscape of the Russian Pst population.

5. Conclusions

A large-scale virulence analysis was performed on Pst collections originating from common wheat grown in geographically distant regions of Russia. All isolates were avirulent towards lines carrying the Yr5, Yr10, Yr15, and Yr24 genes. Russian commercial wheat varieties don’t possess these effective resistance genes; therefore, the latter could be promising candidates for marker-assisted breeding for yellow rust resistance in Russia. It was shown that most North-Caucasian (Dagestan, Krasnodar, Rostov) and North-Western pathotypes were largely distinct from those in the Volga and Ural regions. Accordingly, the regional Pst collections were divided into two major clusters: one comprised the North-West and North-Caucasian collections, while the second one consisted of the pathogen collections from Volga and Ural. Notably, identical pathotypes were identified in geographically distant regions, namely the North Caucasus and the North-West, suggesting a possible role of long-distance dispersal in the epidemiology of yellow rust in Russia.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org. Figure S1: UPGMA dendrograms of relationships between Pst pathotypes in the Dagestan, Krasnodar and North-West regions; Table S1: Virulence profiles of Russian Pst pathotypes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and data analysis design, E.G. and E.K.; methodology and performing experiments, E.G. and E.S.; data analysis, E.K.; interpretation of results, E.G., E.S., and E.K.; data acquisition and curation, E.G.; drafting the manuscript, E.G. and E.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was carried out within the state assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation to FSBSI VIZR (state registration No. 125031003376-3, theme No. FGEU-2025-0005).

Data Availability Statement

The data used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank all colleagues from Krasnodar, Dagestan, Rostov, Chelyabinsk, and Saint Petersburg for their excellent assistance in collecting and sending samples of yellow rust uredinia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Liu, T.; Wan, A.; Liu, D.; Chen, X. Changes of races and virulence genes in Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, the wheat stripe rust pathogen, in the United States from 1968 to 2009. Plant Dis. 2017, 101, 1522–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hovmøller, M.S.; Patpour, M.; Rodriguez-Algaba, J.; Thach, T.; Sørensen, C.K.; Justesen, A.F.; Hansen, J.G. GRRC report of yellow and stem rust races 2022. GRRC, Aarhus University, Denmark, 2023. Available online: https://agro.au.dk/fileadmin/www.grcc.au.dk/International_Services/Pathotype_YR_results/GRRC_annual_report_2022.pdf (accessed on 6 July 2026).
  3. GRRC Global Rust Reference Center. Definitions of races and genetic groups. Available online: https://agro.au.dk/forskning/internationale-platforme/wheatrust/yellow-rust-tools-maps-and-charts/definitions-of-races-and-genetic-groups (accessed on 6 July 2026).
  4. Sharma-Poudyal, D.; Chen, X.M.; Wan, A.M.; Zhan, G.M.; Kang, Z.S.; Cao, S.Q.; Jin, S.L.; Morgounov, A.; Akin, B.; Mert, Z.; Shah, S.J.A.; Bux, H.; Ashraf, M.; Sharma, R.C.; Madariaga, R.; Puri, K.D.; Wellings, C.; Xi, K.Q.; , Wanyera, R.; Manninger, K.; Ganzález, M.I.; Koyda, M.; Sanin, S.; Patzek, L.J. Virulence characterization of international collections of the wheat stripe rust pathogen, Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici. Plant Dis. 2013, 97, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, X.; Wang, M.; Wan, A.; Bai, Q.; Li, M.; López, P.F.; Maccaferri, M.; Mastrangelo, M.; Barnes, C.; Fabricio, D.; Tenuta, A.U.; Esmail, S.M.; Abdelrhim, A.S. Virulence characterization of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici collections from six countries in 2013 to 2020. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2021, 43, 308–322. [Google Scholar]
  6. Župunski, V.; Savva, L.; Saunders, D.G.O.; Jevtić, R. A recent shift in the Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici population in Serbia coincides with changes in yield losses of commercial winter wheat varieties. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1464454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Volkova, G.V.; Kudinova, O.A.; Matveeva, I.P. Virulence and diversity of Puccinia striiformis in South Russia. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2021, 60, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gultyaeva, E.; Shaydayuk, E.; Kosman, E. Virulence diversity of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici in common wheat in Russian regions in 2019–2021. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gultyaeva, E.I.; Shaydayuk, E.L.; Kosman, E.G. SSR-based analysis of structural variation of the Russian population of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici in 2019–2021. Plant Pathol. 2024, 73, 1761–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hovmøller, M.S.; Thach, T.; Rodriguez-Algaba, J.; Hansen, J.G.; Meyer, M.; Hodson, D.P.; Nazari, K.; Park, R.F.; Tam, R.; Möller, M.; Schwessinger, B.; Rathjen, J.P.; Silva, P.; Riella, V.; Justesen, A.F. Long-term surveillance reveals hybridization by nuclear reassortment and intercontinental spread as major evolutionary drivers in wheat yellow rust. New Phytol. 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Walter, S.; Ali, S.; Kemen, E.; Nazari, K.; Bahri, B.A.; Enjalbert, J.; Hansen, J.G.; Brown, J.K.M.; Sicheritz-Pontén, T.; Jones, J.; de Vallavieille-Pope, C.; Hovmøller, M.S.; Justesen, A.F. Molecular markers for tracking the origin and worldwide distribution of invasive strains of Puccinia striiformis. Ecol. Evol. 2016, 6, 2790–2804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hovmøller, M.S.; Rodriguez-Algaba, J.; Thach, T.; Justesen, A.F.; Hansen, J.G. Report for Puccinia striiformis . race analyses and molecular genotyping 2017, Denmark, GRRC, Aarhus University, 2018. Available online: https://agro.au.dk/fileadmin/Summary_of_Puccinia_striiformis_race_analysis_2017.pdf (accessed on 6 July 2026).
  13. Shaydayuk, E.L.; Gultyaeva, E.I. Characterization of the Northwestern population of Puccinia striiformis f.sp. tritici on the basis of virulence and representation of invasive PstS1 and PstS2 races. Mikol. Fitopatol. 2023, 57, 435–446. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gultyaeva, E.I.; Shaydayuk, E.L. Structure of Russian populations of yellow rust pathogen for virulence and SSR markers in 2023. Mikol. Fitopatol. 2025, 59, 333–342. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hovmøller, M.S.; Justesen, A.F.; Brown, J.K.M. Clonality and long distance migration of Puccinia striiformis f.sp. tritici in north-west Europe. Plant Pathol. 2002, 51, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Linde, C.C.; Zhan, J.; McDonald, B.A. Population structure of Mycosphaerella graminicola: from lesions to continents. Phytopathol. 2002, 92, 946–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. de Vallavieille-Pope, C.; Ali, S.; Leconte, M.; Enjalbert, J.; Delos, M.; Rouzet, J. Virulence dynamics and regional structuring of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici in France between 1984 and 2009. Plant Dis. 2012, 96, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hubbard, A.; Lewis, C.M.; Yoshida, K.; Ramirez-Gonzalez, R.H.; de Vallavieille-Pope, C.; Thomas, J.; Kamoun, S.; Bayles, R.; Uauy, C.; Saunders, D.G. Field pathogenomics reveals the emergence of a diverse wheat yellow rust population. Genome Biol. 2015, 16, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Sørensen, C.K.; Hovmøller, M.S.; Leconte, M.; Dedryver, F.; de Vallavieille-Pope, C. New races of Puccinia striiformis found in Europe reveal race specificity of long-term effective adult plant resistance in wheat. Phytopathol. 2014, 104, 1042–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Hovmøller, M.S.; Walter, S.; Bayles, R.A.; Hubbard, A.; Flath, K.; Sommerfeldt, N.; Leconte, M.; Czembor, P.; Rodriguez-Algaba, J.; Thach, T.; et al. Replacement of the European wheat yellow rust population by new races from the centre of diversity in the near-himalayan region. Plant Pathol. 2016, 65, 402–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shahin, A.A. Occurrence of new races and virulence changes of the wheat stripe rust pathogen (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici) in Egypt. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2020, 53, 552–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jevtić, R.; Župunski, V.; Živančev, D.; Orbović, B. Changes in Serbian yellow rust races reveal genotype-specific responses of yield and quality-related traits in commercial winter wheat. Microorganisms 2026, 14, 1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ding, Y.; Cuddy, W.S.; Wellings, C.R.; Zhang, P.; Thach, T.; Hovmøller, M.S.; Qutob, D.; Brar, G.S.; Kutcher, H.R.; Park, R.F. Incursions of divergent genotypes, evolution of virulence and host jumps shape a continental clonal population of the stripe rust pathogen Puccinia striiformis. Mol. Ecol. 2021, 30, 6566–6584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Župunski, V.; Savva, L.; Saunders, D.G.O.; Jevtić, R. A recent shift in the Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici population in Serbia coincides with changes in yield losses of commercial winter wheat varieties. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1464454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Akan, K.; Cat, A.; Yurduseven, M.; Tekin, Y.S.; Yeken, M.Z.; Tekin, M. Evaluation of the potential risk posed by emerging Yr5-virulent and predominant races of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici on bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties grown in Türkiye. J. Fungi. 2025, 11, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. WARNING, R.U.S.T.W.A.T.C.H. W.H.E.A.T. R.U.S.T. E.A.R.L.Y. Wheat vulnerability to yellow rust in Europe in 2026. Available online: https://agro.au.dk/fileadmin/www.grcc.au.dk/Publications/Wheat_vulnerability_to_yellow_rust.pdf (accessed on 6 July 2026).
  27. Gultyaeva, E.I.; Shaydayuk, E.L.; Levitin, M.M. Characterization of modern Russian varieties of spring soft wheat for their resistance to yellow rust. Russ. Agric. Sci. 2025, 51, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ivanova, Yu.N.; Rosenfread, K.K.; Stasyuk, A.I.; Skolotneva, E.S.; Silkova, O.G. Raise and characterization of a bread wheat hybrid line (Tulaykovskaya 10 × Saratovskaya 29)with chromosome 6Agi2 introgressed from Thinopyrum intermedium. Vavilov J. Genet. Breed. 2021, 25, 701–712, (in Russ.). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zeleneva, Y.V.; Sudnikova, V.P.; Buchneva, G.N. Immunological characteristics of soft winter wheat varieties in conditions of the CBR. Tr. Kuban. Gos. Agrar. Univ. 2022, 96, 95–99, (In Russ.). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sheshegova, T.K.; Volkova, L.V.; Shchekleina, L.M. Sources of complex resistance of spring soft wheat from the collection of the N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Research Institute of Plant Industry (VIR). Vestn. Voronezhskogo Gos. Agrar. Univ. 2023, 16, 49–58, (In Russ.). [Google Scholar]
  31. Gultyaeva, E.I.; Shaydayuk, E.L. Diversity of Northwestern and North Caucasian populations of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici by virulence and microsatellite loci in 2022. Mikol. Fitopatol. 2024, 58, 327–338, (In Russ.). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Keishilov, Zh.S.; Kokhmetova, A.M.; Urozaliev, R.A.; Nurzhuma, M.; Mukhametzhanov, K. Phytosanitary monitoring of wheat yellow rust (Puccinia striiformis) in Zhаmbyl and Turkestan regions. Izdenister Natigeler (In Kazakh.). 2023, 3, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kokhmetova, A.; Rathan, N.D.; Sehgal, D.; Malysheva, A.; Kumarbayeva, M.; Nurzhuma, M.; Bolatbekova, A.; Krishnappa, G.; Gultyaeva, E.; Kokhmetova, A.; Keishilov, Z.; Bakhytuly, K. QTL mapping for seedling and adult plant resistance to stripe and leaf rust in two winter wheat populations. Front. Genet. 2023, 14, 1265859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kokhmetova, A.; Sharma, R.; Rsaliyev, S.; Galymbek, K.; Baymagambetova, K.; Ziyaev, Z.; Morgounov, A. Evaluation of Central Asian wheat germplasm for stripe rust resistance. Plant Genet. Resour.-Charact. Util. 2018, 16, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rsaliyev, Sh.; Rsaliyev, A.; Urazaliev, R.; Dubekova, S.; Serikbaikyzy, A. Population composition and virulence of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici in Kazakhstan. Plant Prot. Sci. 2025, 61, 152–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bankina, B.; Jakobija, I.; Bimšteine, G. Peculiarities of wheat leaf disease distribution in Latvia. Acta Biol. Univ. Daugavp. 2011, 11, 47–54. [Google Scholar]
  37. Feodorova-Fedotova, L.; Bankina, B. Occurrence of genetic lineages of Puccinia striiformis in Latvia agricultural sciences. Res. Rural Dev. 2020, 35, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chugunkova, T.V.; Pastukhova, N.L.; Topchii, T.V.; Pirko, Y.V.; Blume, Y.B. Harmfulness of wheat yellow rust and identification of resistance genes to its highly virulent races. Sci. Innov. 2023, 19, 66–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhukovsky, A.G.; Buga, S.F.; Krupenko, N.A.; Zhuk, E.I.; Radyna, A.A.; Poplavskaya, N.G.; Leshkevich, V.G.; Radivon, V.A.; Burnos, N.A.; Khalaev, A.N.; Zhukovskaya, A.A. Phytopathological situation in grain crops on the territory of the Republic of Belarus. Сrop Farming Plant Grow. In Russ.. 2017, 2, 9–12. [Google Scholar]
  40. Karimova, А.М. Phytopathological assessment of Azerbaijan origin bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes against yellow rust. Agrar. Nauchnyy Zhurnal 2023, 5, 16–23, (In Russ.). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Afonin, A.N.; Greene, S.L.; Dzyubenko, N.I.; Frolov, A.N. (Eds.) Interactive agricultural ecological atlas of Russia and neighboring countries. Economic plants and their diseases, pests and weeds; 2008; Available online: http://www.agroatlas.ru (accessed on 6 July 2026)(In Russ.).
  42. Hovmøller, M.S.; Rodriguez-Algaba, J.; Thach, T.; Sørensen, C.K. Race typing of Puccinia striiformis on wheat. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017, 1659, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. McIntosh, R.A.; Wellings, C.R.; Park, R.F. Wheat rusts. An atlas of resistance genes; CSIRO Australia, Kluwer Acad. Publ.: Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kosman, E. Measure of multilocus correlation as a new parameter for study of plant pathogen populations. Phytopathol. 2003, 93, 1464–1470. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kosman, E. Difference and diversity of plant pathogen populations: a new approach for measuring. Phytopathol. 1996, 86, 1152–1155. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kosman, E.; Leonard, K.J. Conceptual analysis of methods applied to assessment of diversity within and distance between populations with asexual or mixed mode of reproduction. New Phytol. 2007, 174, 683–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kosman, E. Measuring diversity: from individuals to populations. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2014, 138, 467–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gultyaeva, E.I.; Shaydayuk, E.L.; Kosman, E. Regional and temporal differentiation of virulence phenotypes of Puccinia triticina Eriks. from common wheat in Russia during the period 2001–2018. Plant Pathol. 2020, 69, 860–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Czajowski, G.; Kosman, E.; Słowacki, P.; Park, R.F.; Czembor, P. Assessing new SSR markers for utility and informativeness in genetic studies of brown rust fungi on wheat, triticale and rye. Plant Pathol. 2021, 70, 1110–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kosman, E.; Ben-Yehuda, P.; Manisterski, J. Diversity of virulence phenotypes among annual populations of wheat leaf rust in Israel from 1993 to 2008. Plant Pathol. 2014, 63, 563–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Scheiner, S.M.; Kosman, E.; Presley, S.J.; Willig, M.R. Decomposing functional diversity. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2017, 97, 809–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Scheiner, S.M.; Kosman, E.; Presley, S.J.; Willig, M.R. The units of biodiversity. Ecol. Monogr. 2025, 95, e70019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kosman, E.; Chen, X.; Dreiseitl, A.; McCallum, B.; Lebeda, A.; Ben-Yehuda, P.; Gultyaeva, E.; Manisterski, J. Functional variation of plant-pathogen interactions: new concept and methods for virulence data analyses. Phytopathol. 2019, 109, 1324–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sun, X.; Kosman, E.; Sharon, O.; Ezrati, S.; Sharon, A. Significant host- and environment-dependent differentiation among highly sporadic fungal endophyte communities in cereal crops-related wild grasses. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 22, 3357–3374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kosman, E.; Burgio, K.R.; Presley, S.J.; Willig, M.R.; Scheiner, S.M. Conservation prioritization based on trait-based metrics illustrated with global parrot distributions. Divers. Distrib. 2019, 25, 1156–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kosman, E.; Park, R.F. Singularity of pathogen isolates: assessment and applications. Plant Pathol. 2026, 75, e70112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kosman, E.; Feijen, F.; Jokela, J. Effective number of different populations: A new concept and how to use it. Ecol. Evol. 2024, 14, e70303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kosman, E.; Dinoor, A.; Herrmann, A.; Schachtel, G.A. Virulence Analysis Tool (VAT). 2008. User Manual. Available online: https://en-lifesci.tau.ac.il/profile/kosman (accessed on 6 July 2026).
  59. Schachtel, G.A.; Dinoor, A.; Herrmann, A.; Kosman, E. Comprehensive evaluation of virulence and resistance data: a new analysis tool. Plant Dis. 2012, 96, 1060–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Brar, G.S.; Kutcher, H.R. Race characterization of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, the cause of wheat stripe rust, in Saskatchewan and Southern Alberta, Canada and virulence comparison with races from the United States. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 1744–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Kosman, E.; Ben-Yehuda, P.; Manisterski, J.; Anikster, Y.; Sela, H. Virulence survey of Puccinia striiformis in Israel revealed considerable changes in the pathogen population during the period 2001 to 2019. Plant Dis. 2022, 106, 2823–2830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Gultyaeva, E.I.; Shaydayuk, E.L.; Smirnova, R.E.; Abdullaev, K.M.; Kurkiev, K.U. Virulence diversity of the yellow rust pathogen population in Dagestan. Proc. Appl. Bot. Genet. Breed. 2023, 184, 190–204, (In Russ.). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gultyaeva, E.I.; Shaydayuk, E.L.; Abdullaev, K.M.; Aydemirova, Z.S. Monitoring the virulence of the wheat yellow rust pathogen in Dagestan. Proc. Appl. Bot. Genet. Breed. 2025, 186, 204–217, (In Russ.). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Gultyaeva, E.I.; Shaydayuk, E.L.; Zuev, E.V. The potential of modern Russian winter and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties for genetic protection against leaf and yellow rust. Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya Biol. [Agricultural Biology] 2025, 60, 485–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Gultyaeva, E.I.; Bespalova, L.A.; Ablova, I.B.; Shaydayuk, E.L.; Khudokormova, Zh.N.; Yakovleva, D.R.; Titova, Yu.A. Wild grasses as the reservoirs of infection of rust species for winter soft wheat in the Northern Caucasus. Vavilov J. Genet. Breed. 2021, 25, 638–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Sinha, P.; Chen, X. Potential infection risks of the wheat stripe rust and stem rust pathogens on Barberry in Asia and Southeastern Europe. Plants 2021, 10, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Collection sites of Puccinia striiformis in Russia during 2024 - 2025.
Figure 1. Collection sites of Puccinia striiformis in Russia during 2024 - 2025.
Preprints 224526 g001
Figure 2. UPGMA dendrogram of relationships among all 38 pathotypes identified in six regional Puccinia sttriiformis collections of isolates for the sets of 27 differentials; the dendrogram was constructed based on the sm (simple mismatch) dissimilarity between virulence pathotypes; region abbreviation: D – Dagestan, Kr – Krasnodar, R – Rostov, NW – North-West, V – Volga, and U – Ural. Pathotype designations include the corresponding region and pathotype number: D_p29 means pathotype number 29 (p29) from Dagestan; Kr_p1 and R_p1 are the same pathotype p1 from the Krasnodar and Rostov regions, respectively, etc.
Figure 2. UPGMA dendrogram of relationships among all 38 pathotypes identified in six regional Puccinia sttriiformis collections of isolates for the sets of 27 differentials; the dendrogram was constructed based on the sm (simple mismatch) dissimilarity between virulence pathotypes; region abbreviation: D – Dagestan, Kr – Krasnodar, R – Rostov, NW – North-West, V – Volga, and U – Ural. Pathotype designations include the corresponding region and pathotype number: D_p29 means pathotype number 29 (p29) from Dagestan; Kr_p1 and R_p1 are the same pathotype p1 from the Krasnodar and Rostov regions, respectively, etc.
Preprints 224526 g002
Figure 3. UPGMA dendrograms of relationships among the regional Pst collections of isolates for the sets of 27 (a) and 12 (b) differentials; the dendrograms were constructed based on the KB distance between collections with regard to the simple mismatch dissimilarity between virulence pathotypes of isolates; region abbreviation: D – Dagestan, Kr – Krasnodar, R – Rostov, NW – North-West, V – Volga, and U – Ural.
Figure 3. UPGMA dendrograms of relationships among the regional Pst collections of isolates for the sets of 27 (a) and 12 (b) differentials; the dendrograms were constructed based on the KB distance between collections with regard to the simple mismatch dissimilarity between virulence pathotypes of isolates; region abbreviation: D – Dagestan, Kr – Krasnodar, R – Rostov, NW – North-West, V – Volga, and U – Ural.
Preprints 224526 g003aPreprints 224526 g003b
Table 1. Composition of the Russian regional Puccinia striiformis collections in 2024-2025.
Table 1. Composition of the Russian regional Puccinia striiformis collections in 2024-2025.
Region N 1 Pathotypes Composition and frequency (%) of pathotypes
D 2 16 10 p7=38 3, p4=6, p8=6, p11=6, p21=6, p22=6, p3=12, p29=6, p36=6, p38=6
Kr 26 16 p7=11, p11=7, p21=7, p22=7, p1=4, p4=4, p6=4, p8=4, p14=15, p15=7, p16=7, p10=7, p31=4, p32=4, p35=4, p37=4
R 6 3 p1=33, p6=33, p9=33
NW 29 11 p4=24, p13=24, p2=17, p12=10, p23=3, p24=3, p25=3, p26=3, p27=3, p30=3, p33=3
V 8 3 p20=50, p19=37, p34=13
U 10 4 p5=40, p18=30, p17=20, p28=10
1 N - number of isolates in each collection; 2 region abbreviation: D – Dagestan, Kr – Krasnodar, R – Rostov, NW – North-West, V – Volga, and U – Ural; 3 designation of pathotypes and their frequency: p7=38 means the pathotype number 7 with frequency 38% etc.; pathotypes occurring in two or more regions are indicated in bold; virulence profiles of pathotypes are shown in Table S1 (Supplement).
Table 2. Virulence frequency of isolates in the Russian regional collections of Puccinia striiformis in 2024 - 2025.
Table 2. Virulence frequency of isolates in the Russian regional collections of Puccinia striiformis in 2024 - 2025.
Yr genes Line with their Yr genes D 1 Kr R V U NW Russia 2
Yr1 Avocet/ Yr1 31.3 57.7 0 100 50 37.9 46.3
Yr5 Avocet/ Yr5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yr6 Avocet/ Yr6 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Yr7 Avocet/ Yr7 81.3 88.5 66.7 100 100 27.6 69.5
Yr8 Avocet/ Yr8 100 69.2 100 100 90 100 90.5
Yr9 Avocet/ Yr9 87.5 96.2 100 87.5 100 72.4 87.4
Yr10 Avocet/ Yr10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yr15 Avocet/ Yr15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yr17 Avocet/ Yr17 6.3 19.2 33.3 0 10 0 9.5
Yr24 Avocet/ Yr24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
YrSp Avocet/ YrSP 100 96.2 100 62.5 0 100 85.3
Yr27 Avocet/ Yr27 93.8 96.2 100 100 100 96.6 96.8
Yr1 Chinese 166 31.3 57.7 0 100 50 37.9 46.3
Yr7, Yr22, Yr23 Lee 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Yr6, Yr+ Heines Kolben 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Yr3, Yr+ Vilmorin 23 93.8 92.3 100 12.5 0 93.1 76.8
Yr10 Moro 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
YrSD, Yr25, Yr+ Strubes Dickkopf 87.5 76.9 0 12.5 50 55.2 58.9
YrSu, Yr+ Suwon 92/Omar 100 100 100 100 100 96.6 98.9
Yr4, Yr+ Hybrid 46 93.8 92.3 0 12.5 0 82.8 67.4
Yr7, Yr+ Reishesberg 42 87.5 80.8 0 87.5 40 96.6 77.9
Yr2,Yr6,Yr25, Yr+ Heines Peko 87.5 88.5 100 100 80 89.7 89.5
YrND, Yr3 Nord Desprez 18.8 23.1 0 100 0 69 38.9
Yr8, Yr18, Yr19 Compair 93.8 84.6 100 100 100 100 94.7
Yr32, Yr25, Yr+ Carstens V 93.8 100 100 12.5 0 62.1 69.5
YrSP, Yr6 Spaldings Prolific 87.5 96.2 100 62.5 0 89.7 80
Yr2, Yr25, Yr+3 Heines VII 100 96.2 100 50 40 96.6 87.4
1 region abbreviation: D – Dagestan, Kr – Krasnodar, R – Rostov, NW – North-West, V – Volga, and U – Ural; 2 pool of all isolates collected in the six Russian regions.
Table 3. Characterization of Pst pathotypes identified in the six Russian regions.
Table 3. Characterization of Pst pathotypes identified in the six Russian regions.
Parameters D 1 Kr R V U NW Total
Number of isolates 16 26 6 8 10 29 95
Number of pathotypes 10 16 3 3 4 11 38
Average RVC of isolates 2 0.66 0.65 0.56 0.59 0.45 0.63 0.62
RVC range of pathotypes 0.59-0.74 0.52-0.74 0.52-0.59 0.56-0.70 0.41-0.48 0.44-0.70 0.41-0.74
Average singularity of pathotypes 8.33 8.5 8.72 11.39 14.04 9.98 9.48
Prevailing pathotypes, their avirulence formulae (in parentheses) and absolute abundances 3
p1 (AvocetYr:1,5,7,10,15,17,24; Chinese 166, Moro, Strubes Dickkopf, Hybrid 46, Reishesberg 42, Nord Desprez) 3 1 3 0 2 3 0 0 0 3 3
p4 (AvocetYr: 1,5,9,10,15,17,24; Chinese 166, Moro, Nord Desprez) 1 1 0 0 0 7 9
p6 (AvocetYr: 1,5,10,15,17,24; Chinese 166, Moro, Strubes Dickkopf, Hybrid 46, Reishesberg 42, Nord Desprez) 0 1 2 0 0 0 3
p7 (AvocetYr: 1,5,10,15,17,24; Chinese 166, Moro, Nord Desprez) 5 4 0 0 0 0 9
p8 (AvocetYr: 1,5,10,15,17,24; Chinese 166, Mor)o 1 1 0 0 0 0 2
p11 (AvocetYr: 5,7,10,15,17,24; Vilmorin 23, Moro, Strubes Dickkopf, Reishesberg 42, Heines Peko) 1 2 0 0 0 0 3
p21 (AvocetYr: 5,7,10,15,17,24; Moro, Nord Desprez, Compair) 1 1 0 0 0 0 2
p22 (AvocetYr: 5,10,15,17,24; Moro, Nord Desprez) 1 2 0 0 0 0 3
1 region abbreviation: D – Dagestan, Kr – Krasnodar, R – Rostov, NW – North-West, V – Volga, and U – Ural; 2 RVC - relative virulence complexity; 3 pathotypes occurring in two or more regions: designation (avirulence formula), and number of isolates with this pathotype in a given collection; for example, Pst pathotype p1 was identified for one, two and three isolates in the Dagestan, Rostov and whole Russian collections, respectively.
Table 4. Variability within Puccinia striiformis collections sampled in six Russian regions as established with three sets of differentials.
Table 4. Variability within Puccinia striiformis collections sampled in six Russian regions as established with three sets of differentials.
Region N1 Pathotypes 2 KW dispersion ENDI3 nENDI4
12 5 15 6 27 7 12 15 27 12 15 27 12 15 27
D 8 16 7 9 10 0.125 0.167 0.148 2.60 3.08 2.91 0.106 0.139 0.127
Kr 26 10 10 16 0.192 0.21 0.202 5.34 5.51 5.62 0.174 0.180 0.185
R 6 3 1 3 0.111 0 0.049 1.49 1.00 1.22 0.098 0.000 0.043
V 8 3 3 3 0.083 0.2 0.148 1.48 2.09 1.83 0.068 0.156 0.118
U 10 3 4 4 0.117 0.267 0.2 1.81 3.09 2.56 0.090 0.232 0.174
NW 29 6 10 11 0.161 0.276 0.22 4.72 7.83 6.55 0.133 0.244 0.198
1 N - number of isolates in each collection; 2 number of pathotypes in each collection for the corresponding set of 12, 15 and 27 differentials; 3 effective number of different isolates in each collection for the corresponding set of differentials, 1 E N D I N ; 4 normalized effective number of different isolates in each collection for the corresponding set of differentials aimed at comparison samples of different size (number of isolates), 0 n E N D I 1 ; 5 set of 12 wheat Yr single-gene differentials in the Avocet spring wheat background (Table1); 6 set of 15 supplemental wheat differentials (Table 1); the corresponding data are shown in italic; 7 combined set of 27 (12 Avocet + 15 supplemental) wheat differentials; the corresponding data are shown in bold; 8 region abbreviation: D – Dagestan, Kr – Krasnodar, R – Rostov, NW – North-West, V – Volga, and U – Ural.
Table 5. KB distance and significance of pairwise differentiation between Puccinia striiformis collections from the Russian regions calculated with the virulence phenotypes of isolates on the sets of 27 and 12 differentials.
Table 5. KB distance and significance of pairwise differentiation between Puccinia striiformis collections from the Russian regions calculated with the virulence phenotypes of isolates on the sets of 27 and 12 differentials.
D 1 Kr R NW V U
D 0 0.0822, 3 0.168 0.112 0.273 0.272
Kr 0.0774 0 0.189 0.131 0.269 0.286
R 0.076 0.113 0 0.206 0.293 0.273
NW 0.076 0.132 0.118 0 0.236 0.304
V 0.115 0.125 0.181 0.159 0 0.191
U 0.142 0.131 0.181 0.196 0.121 0
1 region abbreviation: D – Dagestan, Kr – Krasnodar, R – Rostov, NW – North-West, V – Volga, and U – Ural; 2 based on d i f K W , distances with no statistically significant extent of differentiation between the corresponding collections are shown in bold; rejection (acceptance) of the hypothesis of “no differentiation” was done at p < 0.01 (p > 0.05) level; 3 results based on the set of 27 differentials are shown above the diagonal; 4 results based on the Avocet set of 12 differentials (below diagonal) are shown in italic.
Table 7. Relationships between the Russian Pst pathotypes and the PstS race groups: (a) Ural, Volga and North-West; (b) Krasnodar region; (c) North Caucasus.
Table 7. Relationships between the Russian Pst pathotypes and the PstS race groups: (a) Ural, Volga and North-West; (b) Krasnodar region; (c) North Caucasus.
7a U 1 U, V U NW
Race group Virulence formula p 5 ^  2 p 18 ^ , p 19 ^ p 28 ^ p 30 ^
PstS1/2 3 -,2,-,-,-,6,7,8,9,-,-,-,-,25,-,-,-,AvS 4 2 5,27 6
PstS1/2,v1 1,2,-,-,-,6,7,8,9,-,-,-,-,25,-,-,-,AvS 25,27
PstS1/2,v3 -,2,3,-,-,6,7,8,9,-,-,-,-,25,-,-,-,AvS 27,Sp
PstS1/2,v27 -,2,-,-,-,6,7,8,9,-,-,-,-,25,27,-,-,AvS 2 1,25 8,17 3,Sp
PstS1/2,v1,v27 1,2,-,-,-,6,7,8,9,-,-,-,-,25,27,-,-,AvS 4,25
PstS1/2,v3,v27 -,2,3,-,-,6,7,8,9,-,-,-,-,25,27,-,-,AvS 2,3 Sp
PstS6 1,2,-,-,-,6,7,-,9,-,-,17,-,-,27,-,-,AvS 8,17 1,25
PstS13 (Triticale) -,2,-,-,-,6,7,8,9,-,-,-,-,-,-,-,-,AvS 1,27
7b Kr Kr Kr
Race group Virulence formula p 14 ^ , p 15 ^ p 16 ^ p 37 ^
PstS7 (Warrior) 1,2,3,4,-,6,7,-,9,-,-,17,-,25,-,32,Sp,AvS 17,27 25,27 8,17
PstS9 1,2,3,4,-,6,-,-,9,-,-,-,-,25,27,32,-, AvS 7,Sp
PstS10 (Warrior(-)) 1,2,3,4,-,6,7,-,9,-,-,17,-,25,-,32,Sp,AvS 17,27 8,27 8,17
7c R Kr D, Kr Kr
Race group Virulence formula p 9 ^ p 10 ^ , p 32 ^ p 21 ^ , p 22 ^ , p 38 ^ p 35 ^
PstS14 -,2,3,-,-,6,7,8,9,-,-,17,-,25,-,32,(Sp),AvS 25,27 4,27 1,4
PstS16 1,2,3,(4),-,6,7,8,9,-,-,17,-,25,27,32,-,AvS 1,Sp 17,Sp 2,17
1 region abbreviation: D – Dagestan, Kr – Krasnodar, R – Rostov, NW – North-West, V – Volga, and U – Ural; 2 designation of a reduced virulence profile of the corresponding pathotype for the set of 18 differentials (e.g., p 5 ^ means the reduced virulence profile of pathotype p5); 3 designation of race groups according to GRRC [10]; 4 virulence profile of the corresponding race group, where figures and symbols designate virulence and avirulence (-) corresponding to Yr-genes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 17, 24, 25, 27, 32, and the resistance specificity of Spalding Prolific (Sp) and Avocet S (AvS), respectively; 5 designate a mismatch between the corresponding pathotype and race group because of avirulence of that pathotype to this specific differential (e.g., p5 and PstS1/2 are avirulent and virulent on Yr2, respectively); 6 bold font is used to designate a mismatch between the corresponding pathotype and race group due to virulence of that pathotype to this specific differential (e.g., p5 and PstS1/2 are virulent and avirulent to Yr27, respectively).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.