Submitted:
21 July 2026
Posted:
21 July 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Synthetic and Actual Mine Drainage
2.2. CWs Set up
2.3. Operating Conditions of the CWs
2.4. Sampling and Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Performance of CWs During Phased Operation
3.1.1. Phase I
3.1.2. Phase II
3.1.3. Phase III
3.1.4. Phase IV
3.1.5. Phase V
3.2. Comparison of Treatment Performance Among Phases
3.3. Relationship Between pH and Metal Removal
4. Discussion
4.1. Applicability and Robustness of CWs for Actual Mine Drainage
4.2. Removal Mechanisms for Mn and Zn in CWs
4.3. Effects of Vegetation on Metal Removal
4.4. Effects of Temperature and HRT on Metal Removal
4.5. Implications for Practical Applications
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| CW | Constructed wetland |
| DO | Dissolved oxygen |
| HRT | Hydraulic retention time |
| MnOB | Manganese-oxidizing bacteria |
| ORP | Oxidation-reduction potential |
| TDS | Total dissolved solids |
References
- Iwasaki, Y.; Fukaya, K.; Fuchida, S.; Matsumoto, S.; Araoka, D.; Tokoro, C.; Yasutaka, T. Projecting future changes in element concentrations of approximately 100 untreated discharges from legacy mines in Japan by a hierarchical log-linear model. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 786, 147500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soda, S.; Nguyen, T.T. Classification of mine drainages in Japan based on water quality: Consideration for constructed wetland treatments. Water 2023, 15(7), 1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tong, L.; Fan, R.; Yang, S.; Li, C. Development and status of the treatment technology for acid mine drainage. Min. Metall. Explor. 2021, 38, 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tebo, B. M.; Johnson, H. A.; McCarthy, J. K.; Templeton, A. S. Geomicrobiology of manganese (II) oxidation. Trends Microbiol. 2005, 13(9), 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cai, Y.; Yang, K.; Qiu, C.; Bi, Y.; Tian, B.; Bi, X. A review of manganese-oxidizing bacteria (MnOB): Applications, future concerns, and challenges. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mo, W.; Wang, H.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Luo, Y.; He, M.; Cheng, S.; Mei, H.; He, J.; Su, J. Advances in research on bacterial oxidation of Mn(II): A visualized bibliometric analysis based on CiteSpace. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tojo, F.; Kitayama, A.; Miyata, N.; Okano, K.; Fukushima, J.; Suzuki, R.; Tani, T. Molecular cloning and heterologous expression of manganese (II)-oxidizing enzyme from Acremonium strictum strain KR21-2. Catalysts 2020, 10, 686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pat-Espadas, A.M.; Loredo-Portales, R.; Amabilis-Sosa, L.E.; Gómez, G.; Vidal, G. Review of constructed wetlands for acid mine drainage treatment. Water 2018, 10, 1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, Z. H.; Whiting, S. N.; Lin, Z. Q.; Lytle, C. M.; Qian, J. H.; Terry, N. Removal and distribution of iron, manganese, cobalt, and nickel within a Pennsylvania constructed wetland treating coal combustion byproduct leachate. J. Environ. Qual. 2001, 30(4), 1464–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hallberg, K.B.; Johnson, D.B. Biological manganese removal from acid mine drainage in constructed wetlands and prototype bioreactors. Sci. Total Environ. 2005, 338(1–2), 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Batty, L.C.; Hooley, D.; Younger, P.L. Iron and manganese removal in wetland treatment systems: rates, processes and implications for management. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 394(1), 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, J.C.; Chen, G.; Huang, X.F.; Li, G.M.; Liu, J.; Yang, N.; Gao, S.N. Iron and manganese removal by using manganese ore constructed wetlands in the reclamation of steel wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 169(1–3), 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kularatne, R.K.A.; Kasturiarachchi, J.C.; Manatunge, J.M.A.; Wijeyekoon, S.L.J. Mechanisms of manganese removal from wastewaters in constructed wetlands comprising water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms) grown under different nutrient conditions. Water Environ. Res. 2009, 81(2), 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, H.; Zhang, M.; Lv, Q.; Xu, J.; Zhao, Y.; Li, Y. Effective co-treatment of synthetic acid mine drainage and domestic sewage using multi-unit passive treatment system supplemented with silage fermentation broth as carbon source. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 310, 114803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lafont, C.; Vaxelaire, S.; Gelabert, A.; Joulian, C.; Thouin, H.; Duré, F.; Charron, M.; Gorny, J.; Vantelon, D.; Battaglia-Brunet, F.; van Hullebusch, E.D. Manganese removal in a full-scale constructed wetland for passive mine water treatment: Environmental factors and microbial communities. Water Res. 2026, 295, 125539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Silva, A.M.; Cruz, F.L.S.; Lima, R.M.F.; Teixeira, M.C.; Leão, V.A. Manganese and limestone interactions during mine water treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 181, 514–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Okeme, I.C.; Srivastava, P.; Sapsford, D.J. Highly efficient co-removal of zinc and manganese during passive treatment of mine drainage: Mechanisms, microbiology and application. Ecol. Eng. 2025, 219, 107681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Catts, J.G.; Langmuir, D. Adsorption of Cu, Pb and Zn by δMnO₂: Applicability of the site binding–surface complexation model. Appl. Geochem. 1986, 1, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campbell, C.D.; Grayston, S.J.; Hirst, D.J. Use of rhizosphere carbon sources in sole carbon source tests to discriminate soil microbial communities. J. Microbiol. Methods 1997, 30, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lesage, E.; Rousseau, D.P.L.; Meers, E.; Van de Moortel, A.M.K.; Du Laing, G.; Tack, F.M.G.; Verloo, M.G. Accumulation of metals in the sediment and reed biomass of a combined constructed wetland treating domestic wastewater. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2007, 183, 253–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mays, P.A.; Edwards, G.S. Comparison of heavy metal accumulation in a natural wetland and constructed wetland receiving acid mine drainage. Ecol. Eng. 2001, 16, 487–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ioannidou, V.G.; Pearson, J.M. The effects of flow rate variation and vegetation ageing on the longitudinal mixing and residence time distribution (RTD) in a full-scale constructed wetland. Ecol. Eng. 2019, 138, 248–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kretz, L.; Koll, K.; Seele-Dilbat, C.; van der Plas, F.; Weigelt, A.; Wirth, C. Plant structural diversity alters sediment retention on and underneath herbaceous vegetation in a flume experiment. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0248320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nguyen, T.T.; Soda, S.; Kanayama, A.; Hamai, T. Effects of cattails and hydraulic loading on heavy metal removal from closed mine drainage by pilot-scale constructed wetlands. Water 2021, 13, 1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.T.; Soda, S.; Horiuchi, K. Removal of heavy metals from acid mine drainage with lab-scale constructed wetlands filled with oyster shells. Water 2022, 14, 3325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]




| Wastewater | CW configuration | Effluent | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coal combustion leachate in USA (Mn < 3.3 mg/L, Fe < 4.7 mg/L, pH 6.2-7.7) | A pilot-scale surface flow CW; compost + soil; Typha, Scirpus, Carex; HRT 20 h; 0–30°C | Mn 0.0005–0.44 mg/L, Fe 0.002–0.49 mg/L, pH 6.2-7.7 | [9] |
| Pretreated AMD in UK (Mn 10—40 mg/L, pH 5.0-7.0) | Pilot-scale rock filters following pretreatment; granite; algae; HRT 21h; 5–13 °C | Mn < 1 mg/L (pH 7.0), unchanged (pH <5.0) | [10] |
| Alkaline mine waters in UK (Mn 2 mg/L, Fe 45 mg/L, sulfate 3000 mg/L, pH≈ 7) | Full-scale lagoon + surface-flow CWs; natural sediments; Typha, Phragmites | Mn < 0.4 mg/L, pH 7.8, Fe < 1 mg/L | [11] |
| Steel wastewater in China (Mn 0.11—2.23 mg/L, Fe 0.16—2.24 mg/L, pH 6.5-7.2) | Lab-scale vertical flow CWs; Mn ore or gravel; Phragmites; HRT 2—5 d | Mn < 0.05 mg/L, Fe < 0.05 mg/L, pH 7.5—8.2 | [12] |
| (Mn < 2.23 mg/L) | A pilot-scale subsurface horizontal flow CW; gravel Mn ore; Phragmites; HRT 1.5—3 d | Mn < 0.1 mg/L, Fe removal 94%, pH 6.5—7.2 | |
| Synthetic wastewater in Sri Lanka (Mn 1.0 mg/L, pH 6.2—7.1) | Bench-scale hydroponic CWs; water hyacinth; 3-week cycle batch; 2–22°C | Mn < 0.1 mg/L (re-release after 7d); 0.2—0.4 mg/L (nutrient deficient), pH 7.3—7.8 | [13] |
| Synthetic AMD and domestic sewage in China (Mn 4.8 mg/L, Fe < 1 mg/L, pH 7.4—8.0) | Lab-scale polishing CW after anaerobic pretreatment; limestone, cobblestone; Salvinia, Alternanthera; HRT 4 d | Mn 0.12 ± 0.11 mg/L, Fe < 0.1 mg/L, Zn < 0.1 mg/L, pH 7.8—8.6 | [14] |
| Mine wastewater in France (Mn 3.6 mg/L, Fe 28.4 mg/L, pH 6.5) | Full-scale surface-flow CWs; natural sediments; Phragmites 11–28°C | Mn removal 43—92 % | [15] |
| Synthetic and actual AMD in Japan (Mn 66 mg/L, Zn 10—15 mg/L, pH 5.0–6.5) | Lab-scale horizontal subsurface-flow CWs; limestone; Phragmites; HRT 1–2 d; Greenhouse temperature 15–30 °C | Mn 5.5–20.0 mg/L, Zn 0.2–3.0 mg/L, pH 7.0–7.9 | This study |
| Phase | Date | Influent flow rate (L/d) | Mine drainage |
Mean air temperature (°C) |
Mean daily integrated illuminance (klux·h d⁻¹) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 2023/6/4- 8/26 (Day 0-85) | 1.0 (HRT = 2 d) | Synthetic | 30.7 ± 8.7 | 306 ± 126 |
| II | 2023/8/27- 9/15 (Day 86-101) | Actual | 27.9 ± 7.4 | 241 ± 98 | |
| III | 2023/9/16-10/3 (Day 102-121) | Synthetic | 24.9 ± 5.0 | 186 ± 74 | |
| IV | 2023/10/4-10/22 (Day 122-142) | 2.0 (HRT = 1 d) | Synthetic | 20.8 ± 4.2 | 121 ± 59 |
| V | 2023/10/23-11/21 (Day 143-170) | 1.0 (HRT = 2 d) | Actual | 15.1 ± 7.6 | 196 ± 82 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).