Submitted:
16 July 2026
Posted:
17 July 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction and Motivation
2. Construction and Demolition Waste as a Secondary Resource for Advanced Applications
2.1. Generation and Environmental Impact of C&DW
2.2. Composition and Physicochemical Properties of C&DW
2.3. Sorption and Immobilization Performance of Crushed C&DW
3. C&DW-Derived Geopolymers as Sustainable Cementitious Alternatives
4. Geopolymer Matrices from C&DW for Radionuclide Immobilization
4.1. Waste-Derived Geopolymers for Radionuclide Immobilization
4.2. C&DW-Derived Geopolymers for Radionuclide Immobilization
4.3. Quantitative Overview and Research Trends
5. Knowledge Gaps and Future Perspectives
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| C&DW | Construction And Demolition Waste |
| RES | Renewable Energy Sources |
| RW | Radioactive Waste |
| OPC | Ordinary Portland Cement |
| CE | Circular Economy |
References
- International Energy Agency (IEA). Global Energy Review 2025. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2025 (accessed on 22 April 2026).
- Rajković, M.; Jelić, I.; Janković, M.; Šljivić-Ivanović, M. From fossil fuels to sustainability: Lignite transition and innovations for climate mitigation in Serbia. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Science, Education, Technology and Innovation (SETI 2024), Belgrade, Serbia, 11–12 October 2024; pp. 418–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- International Energy Agency (IEA). Nuclear Power in a Clean Energy System. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/nuclear-power-in-a-clean-energy-system (accessed on 23 April 2026).
- Warner, E.S.; Heath, G.A. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of nuclear electricity generation: Systematic review and harmonization. J. Ind. Ecol. 2012, 16, S73–S92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- International Energy Agency (IEA). Electricity 2025 – Analysis and Forecast to 2026. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/electricity-2025 (accessed on 23 April 2026).
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Classification of Radioactive Waste. Safety Guide No. GSG-1; IAEA: Vienna, Austria, 2009; Available online: https://www.iaea.org/publications/ (accessed on 23 April 2026).
- World Nuclear Association. Radioactive Waste Management. Available online: https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-wastes/radioactive-waste-management.aspx (accessed on 23 April 2026).
- Ember. Global Electricity Review 2024; Chapter 3: Global Electricity Trends; Ember: London, UK, 2024; Available online: https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/global-electricity-review-2024/global-electricity-trends/ (accessed on 23 April 2026).
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Status and Trends in Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Management; IAEA: Vienna, Austria, 2018; Available online: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/p15525-PUB2109_web.pdf (accessed on 23 April 2026).
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Treatment and Conditioning of Radioactive Waste (IAEA Technical Reports Series No. 448); IAEA: Vienna, Austria, 2004; Available online: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/TRS448_web.pdf (accessed on 23 April 2026).
- Jelić, I.; Savić, A.; Miljojčić, T.; Rajković, M.; Janković, M.; Dimović, S.; Sarap, N.; Ćurčić, M.; Stanić, V.; Zakić, D.; Antonijević, D.; Šljivić-Ivanović, M. Toward sustainable solidification of liquid radioactive waste. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Science, Education, Technology and Innovation (SETI 2024), Belgrade, Serbia, 11–12 October 2024; pp. 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Wang, J. Advances in cement solidification technology for waste radioactive ion exchange resins: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 135, 443–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ojovan, M.I.; Lee, W.E. An Introduction to Nuclear Waste Immobilisation, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Šljivić-Ivanović, M.; Jelić, I.; Dimović, S.; Antonijević, D.; Jović, M.; Mraković, A.; Šmičiklas, I. Exploring innovative solutions for aged concrete utilization: Treatment of liquid radioactive waste. Clean. Technol. Environ. Policy 2018, 20, 1343–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The Behaviour of Cementitious Materials in Long-Term Storage and Disposal of Radioactive Waste (IAEA-TECDOC-1701); IAEA: Vienna, Austria, 2013; Available online: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/TE-1701_web.pdf (accessed on 23 April 2026).
- Jelić, I.; Šljivić-Ivanović, M.; Miljojčić, T.; Ćurčić, M.; Dimović, S. Radioactive waste management: Construction and demolition debris in geopolymers. Proceedings of IcETRAN 2021, Ethno Village Stanišići, Republic of Srpska, 8–10 September 2021; pp. 428–431. [Google Scholar]
- Jelić, I.; Šljivić-Ivanović, M.; Dimović, S.; Antonijević, D.; Jović, M.; Vujović, Z.; Šmičiklas, I. Radionuclide immobilization by sorption onto waste concrete and bricks—Experimental design methodology. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2019, 230, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jelić, I.; Šljivić-Ivanović, M.; Dimović, S.; Antonijević, D.; Jović, M.; Serović, R.; Šmičiklas, I. Utilization of waste ceramic and roof tiles for radionuclide sorption. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2016, 105, 348–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrew, R.M. Global CO2 emissions from cement production. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2018, 10, 195–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jevtić, D.; Zakić, D.; Savić, A. Investigation of cement-based composites made with recycled rubber aggregate. Hem. Ind. 2012, 66, 609–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cement Market. Available online: https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/cement-market (accessed on 22 April 2026).
- Benhelal, M.; Zahedi, G.; Shamsaei, E.; Bahadori, A. Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 51, 142–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, T.H.; Mo, K.H.; Lin, J.; Onn, C.C. An overview of the utilization of common waste as an alternative fuel in the cement industry. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2023, 17, 7127007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, M.B.; Saidur, R.; Hossain, M.S. A review on emission analysis in cement industries. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 2252–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Business Wire. Available online: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250423546569/en/Cement-Market-Analysis-Trends-and-Forecasts-to-2030-Global-Cement-Production-is-Projected-to-Reach-5.55-Billion-Tons-and-Cement-Consumption-is-Anticipated-to-Rise-to-5.54-Billion-Tons-in-2030---ResearchAndMarkets.com (accessed on 22 April 2026).
- Kusuma, G.H.; Budidarmawan, J.; Susilowati, A. Impact of concrete quality on sustainability. Procedia Eng. 2015, 125, 754–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scrivener, K.L.; John, V.M.; Gartner, E.M. Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry. Cem. Concr. Res. 2018, 114, 2–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habert, G.; Miller, S.A.; John, V.M.; Provis, J.L.; Favier, A.; Horvath, A.; Scrivener, K.L. Environmental impacts and decarbonization strategies in the cement and concrete industries. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2020, 1, 559–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davidovits, J. Geopolymer Chemistry and Applications; Geopolymer Institute: Saint-Quentin, France, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Provis, J.L. Alkali-activated materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 2018, 114, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duxson, P.; Fernández-Jiménez, A.; Provis, J.L.; Lukey, G.C.; Palomo, A.; van Deventer, J.S.J. Geopolymer technology: The current state of the art. J. Mater. Sci. 2007, 42, 2917–2933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komnitsas, K. Potential of geopolymer technology towards green buildings and sustainable construction. Appl. Clay Sci. 2011, 50, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, C.; Krivenko, P.V.; Roy, D. Alkali-Activated Cements and Concretes; Taylor & Francis: London, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Van Deventer, J.S.J.; Provis, J.L.; Duxson, P. Technical and commercial progress in the adoption of geopolymer cement. Miner. Eng. 2012, 29, 89–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pomponi, F.; Moncaster, A. Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 143, 710–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jelić, I.; Antonijević, D.; Šljivić-Ivanović, M.; Dimović, S. Application of Composite Construction and Demolition Debris in Heavy Metals Removal from Industrial Wastewater. Therm. Sci. 2023, 27(1A), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pacheco-Torgal, F.; Castro-Gomes, J.; Jalali, S. Alkali-activated binders: A review: Part 1. Historical background, terminology, reaction mechanisms and hydration products. Constr. Build. Mater. 2008, 22(7), 1305–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdollahnejad, Z.; Mastali, M.; Falah, M.; Luukkonen, T.; Mazari, M.; Illikainen, M. Construction and Demolition Waste as Recycled Aggregates in Alkali-Activated Concretes. Materials 2019, 12, 4016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Radina, L.; Sprince, A.; Pakrastins, L.; Gailitis, R.; Sakale, G. Potential Use of Construction Waste for the Production of Geopolymers: A Review. Mater. Proc. 2023, 13, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jelić, I.; Savić, A.; Miljojčić, T.; Šljivić-Ivanović, M.; Dimović, S.; Janković, M.; Stanić, V.; Zakić, D.; Antonijević, D. Reuse of Solid Brick Waste Mix in Geopolymerization – A Preliminary Investigation. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Science, Education, Technology and Innovation (SETI 2023), Belgrade, Serbia, 13–14 October 2023; pp. 416–422. [Google Scholar]
- Šljivić-Ivanović, M.; Smičiklas, I. Utilization of C&D Waste in Radioactive Waste Treatment–Current Knowledge and Perspectives. In Advances in Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling; Pacheco-Torgal, F., Ding, Y., Colangelo, F., Tuladhar, R., Koutamanis, A., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2020; pp. 475–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stefanovsky, S.; Yudintsev, S.; Giere, R.; Lumpkin, G. Nuclear Waste Forms; The Geological Society of London: London, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Koťátková, J.; Zatloukal, J.; Reiterman, P.; Kolář, K. Concrete and cement composites used for radioactive waste deposition. J. Environ. Radioact. 2017, 178–179, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jelić, I.; Šljivić-Ivanović, M.; Dimović, S.; Antonijević, D.; Jović, M.; Mirković, M.; Smiciklas, I. The Applicability of Construction and Demolition Waste Components for Radionuclide Sorption. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 171, 322–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Šljivić-Ivanović, M.; Jelić, I.; Dimović, S. Cementitious Waste Materials Utilization in Radionuclide Immobilization by Sorption. In Proceedings of the XIV International Mineral Processing and Recycling Conference (IMPRC 2021), Belgrade, Serbia, 12–14 May 2021; pp. 339–344. [Google Scholar]
- Šljivić-Ivanović, M.; Jelić, I.; Lončar, A.; Nikezić, D.; Dimović, S.; Lončar, B. The Application of Experimental Design Methodology for the Investigation of Liquid Radioactive Waste Treatment. Nucl. Technol. Radiat. Prot. 2017, 32(3), 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dimović, S.; Jelić, I.; Šljivić-Ivanović, M. Utilization of Waste-Based Geopolymers for Radionuclide Immobilization – A Review. In Proceedings of the IcETRAN 2020, Belgrade, Serbia, 28 September 2020; pp. 537–540. [Google Scholar]
- Dimović, S.; Jelić, I.; Šljivić-Ivanović, M.; Jović, M.; Smiciklas, I. Geopolymers Based on Red Mud. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Science, Education, Technology and Innovation (SETI 2019), Belgrade, Serbia, 12 April 2019; pp. 129–137. [Google Scholar]
- Jelić, I.; Bošnjaković, J.; Kostić, A.; Šljivić-Ivanović, M.; Dimović, S.; Savić, A. Utilization of Waste in Geopolymerization – A Review. In Proceedings of the 51st International October Conference on Mining and Metallurgy, Bor Lake, Serbia, 16–19 October 2019; pp. 268–271. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, T.; Lee, M.; Ko, M.; Ueng, T.; Yang, S. The heavy metal adsorption characteristics on metakaolin-based geopolymer. Appl. Clay Sci. 2012, 56, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jelić, I.; Savić, A.; Miljojčić, T.; Šljivić-Ivanović, M.; Dimović, S.; Janković, M.; Stanić, V.; Zakić, D.; Antonijević, D. Development of Low-Carbon and Energy-Efficient Geopolymer-Based Paving Blocks. Sci. Sinter. 2025, 57, 273–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernández-Pereira, C.; Luna-Galiano, Y.; Pérez-Clemente, M.; Leiva, C.; Arroyo, F.; Villegas, R.; Vilches, L.F. Immobilization of heavy metals (Cd, Ni or Pb) using aluminate geopolymers. Mater. Lett. 2018, 227, 184–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alhawat, M.; Ashour, A.; Yildirim, G.; Alper, A.; Aldemir, A.; Sahmaran, M. Properties of geopolymers sourced from construction and demolition waste: A review. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 50, 104104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- U.S. Green Building Council. LEED for New Construction and Major Renovations, Version 2.2 Rating System; U.S. Green Building Council: Washington, DC, USA, 2003; Available online: https://www.usgbc.org/sites/default/files/LEED%20for%20New%20Construction%20v2.2%20Rating%20System%20-%20Marketing.pdf (accessed on 28 April 2026).
- Mymrin, V.A.; Alekseev, K.P.; Catai, R.E.; Izzo, R.L.S.; Rose, J.L.; Nagalli, A.; Romano, C.A. Construction material from construction and demolition debris and lime production wastes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 79, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission. Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW). Available online: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/waste-and-recycling/construction-and-demolition-waste_en (accessed on 28 April 2026).
- Statista. Construction waste as a share of all waste generated in the EU-27 from 2004 to 2022. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1399099/construction-waste-as-a-share-of-all-waste-generated-in-the-eu/ (accessed on 28 April 2026).
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Construction and Demolition Debris: Material-Specific Data. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2025. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/facts-and-figures-about-materials-waste-and-recycling/construction-and-demolition-debris-material (accessed on 28 April 2026).
- Ma, Y.; Hao, J.L. Enhancing a circular economy for construction and demolition waste management in China: A stakeholder engagement and key strategy approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 450, 141763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Environment Agency. Construction and Demolition Waste: Challenges and Opportunities in a Circular Economy; European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2020; Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/construction-and-demolition-waste-challenges (accessed on 28 April 2026).
- European Commission. EU Construction and Demolition Waste Management Protocol, Including Guidelines for Pre-Demolition and Pre-Renovation Audits of Construction Works (Updated Edition 2024). Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d63d5a8f-64e8-11ef-a8ba-01aa75ed71a1/language-en (accessed on 28 April 2026).
- Eurostat. Waste Database. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/waste/database (accessed on 28 April 2026).
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Advancing Sustainable Materials Management: Facts and Figures Report. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2023. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/facts-and-figures-about-materials-waste-and-recycling (accessed on 28 April 2026).
- Zhang, Y.; Tan, W. Demolition waste recycling in China: New evidence from a demolition project for highway development. Waste Manag. Res. 2020, 38, 696–702, × 20904440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, M.; Tam, V.W.Y.; Le, K.N.; Li, W. Challenges in Current Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling: A China Study. Waste Manag. 2020, 118, 610–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- European Commission; Joint Research Centre. Techno-economic and environmental assessment of construction and demolition waste management in the European Union: Status quo and prospective potential; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2024; Available online: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC135470 (accessed on 28 April 2026).
- Panizza, M.; Natali, M.; Garbin, E.; Tamburini, S.; Secco, M. Assessment of geopolymers with construction and demolition waste (CDW) aggregates as a building material. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 181, 119–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pacheco, J.; de Brito, J. Recycled Aggregates Produced from Construction and Demolition Waste for Structural Concrete: Constituents, Properties and Production. Materials 2021, 14, 5748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tam, V.W.Y.; Soomro, M.; Evangelista, A.C.J. A review of recycled aggregate in concrete applications (2000–2017). Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 172, 272–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cristóbal, J.; Caro, D.; Foster, G.; Pristerà, G.; Gallo, F.; Tonini, D. Techno-economic and environmental assessment of construction and demolition waste management in the European Union: Status quo and prospective potential; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2024; Available online: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC135470 (accessed on 24April 2026).
- European Parliament; Council of the European Union. Directive 2008/98/EC on Waste (Waste Framework Directive). Off. J. Eur. Union 2008, L 312, 3–30. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32008L0098 (accessed on 24 April 2026).
- Medineckienė, M.; Turskis, Z.; Kazimieras, Z.; Zavadskas, E.K. Sustainable construction taking into account the building impact on the environment. J. Environ. Eng. Landsc. Manag. 2010, 18(2), 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, L.; Krigsvoll, G.; Johansen, F.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X. Carbon emission of global construction sector. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 1906–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. National Overview: Facts and Figures on Materials, Wastes and Recycling. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/facts-and-figures-about-materials-waste-and-recycling/national-overview-facts-and-figures-materials (accessed on 24 April 2026).
- Barzgar, S.; Yan, Y.; Tarik, M.; Skibsted, J.; Ludwig, C.; Lothenbach, B. A long-term study on structural changes in calcium aluminate silicate hydrates. Mater. Struct. 2022, 55, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moudio, A.M.N.; Tchakouté, H.K.; Ngnintedem, D.L.V.; Andreola, F.; Kamseu, E.; Nanseu-Njiki, C.P.; Leonelli, C.; Rüscher, C.H. Influence of the Synthetic Calcium Aluminate Hydrate and the Mixture of Calcium Aluminate and Silicate Hydrates on the Compressive Strengths and the Microstructure of Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer Cements. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 264, 124459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- John, E.; Lothenbach, B. Cement hydration mechanisms through time – a review. J. Mater. Sci. 2023, 58, 9805–9833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stepkowska, E.; Pérez-Rodríguez, J.L.; Sayagués, M.J.; Martínez-Blanes, J.M. Calcite, vaterite and aragonite forming on cement hydration from liquid and gaseous phase. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2003, 73, 247–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kunhi Mohamed, A.; Moutzouri, P.; Berruyer, P.; Walder, B.J.; Siramanont, J.; Harris, M.; Negroni, M.; Galmarini, S.C.; Parker, S.C.; Scrivener, K.L.; Emsley, L.; Bowen, P. The Atomic-Level Structure of Cementitious Calcium Aluminate Silicate Hydrate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 11060–11071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yao, Y.; Xu, G.; Wu, M.; Zhao, M. Exploring the influence of cement and cement hydration products on strength and interfacial adhesion in emulsified cold recycled mixture: A molecular dynamics and experimental investigation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 409, 134050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, K.; Al Qunaynah, S.; Wan, S.; Yuan, Z.; Xu, P.; Tang, S. A study on the hydration of calcium aluminate cement pastes containing silica fume using non-contact electrical resistivity measurement. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 24, 8135–8149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Black, L.; Garbev, K.; Gee, I. Surface carbonation of synthetic C-S-H samples: A comparison between fresh and aged C-S-H using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Cem. Concr. Res. 2008, 38, 745–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kontoleontos, F.; Tsakiridis, P.; Marinos, A.; Katsiotis, N.; Kaloidas, V.; Katsioti, M. Dry-grinded ultrafine cements hydration: Physicochemical and microstructural characterization. Mater. Res. 2013, 16, 404–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trindade, M.J.; Dias, M.I.; Coroado, J.; Rocha, F. Mineralogical transformations of calcareous rich clays with firing: A comparative study between calcite and dolomite rich clays from Algarve. Appl. Clay Sci. 2009, 42, 345–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Gohary, M.A.; Al-Naddaf, M.M. Characterization of bricks used in the external casing of Roman bath walls “Gadara-Jordan”. Mediterr. Archaeol. Archaeom. 2009, 9, 29–46. Available online: https://www.maajournal.com/index.php/maa/article/view/283/224. [CrossRef]
- Rice, P.M. Pottery Analysis: A Sourcebook; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Carvalho, A.P.; Vaz, F.M.; Samora, M.J.; Pires, J. Characterisation of ceramic pastes of Portuguese ancient tiles. Mater. Sci. Forum 2006, 514–516, 1648–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jordá, J.D.; Jordán, M.M.; Ibanco-Cañete, R.; Montero, M.A.; Reyes-Labarta, J.A.; Sánchez, A.; Cerdán, M. Mineralogical analysis of ceramic tiles by FTIR: A quantitative attempt. Appl. Clay Sci. 2015, 115, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skok, E. Asphalt Paving Technology 2015—; DEStech Publications Inc.: Lancaster, PA, USA, 2016; Volume 84. [Google Scholar]
- Silva, R.V.; de Brito, J.; Dhir, R.K. Properties and composition of recycled aggregates from construction and demolition waste suitable for concrete production. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 65, 201–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, J.; Li, W.; Fan, Y.; Huang, X. An overview of study on recycled aggregate concrete in China. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 31, 364–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ulsen, C.; Kahn, H.; Hawlitschek, G.; Masini, E.A.; Angulo, S.C.; John, V.M. Production of recycled sand from construction and demolition waste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 40, 1168–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, H.F.W. Cement Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Thomas Telford: London, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Morandeau, A.; Thiéry, M.; Dangla, P. Investigation of carbonation mechanism of CH and C–S–H. Cem. Concr. Res. 2014, 56, 153–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petersen, J.C. A Review of the Fundamentals of Asphalt Oxidation: Chemical, Physicochemical, Physical Property, and Durability Relationships; Transportation Research Circular 2126; Transportation Research Board: Washington, DC, USA, 2009; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Lesueur, D. The colloidal structure of bitumen: Consequences on the rheology and on the mechanisms of bitumen modification. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 145, 42–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Provis, J.L.; van Deventer, J.S.J. (Eds.) Alkali Activated Materials: State-of-the-Art Report of RILEM TC 224-AAM; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Davidovits, J. Geopolymer Cement: A Review; Technical Paper No. 21; Geopolymer Institute: Saint-Quentin, France, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Bernal, S.A.; Provis, J.L. Durability of alkali-activated materials: Progress and perspectives. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2014, 97, 997–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yip, C.K.; Lukey, G.C.; Provis, J.L.; van Deventer, J.S.J. Effect of calcium silicate sources on geopolymerisation. Cem. Concr. Res. 2008, 38, 554–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barreto Santos, M.; de Brito, J.; Santos Silva, A. A Review on Alkali-Silica Reaction Evolution in Recycled Aggregate Concrete. Materials 2020, 13, 2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- da Silva Neto, G.A.; de Oliveira, J.P.V.; Salles, P.V.; Barros, R.T.V.; Paulino, M.T.; dos Santos, W.J. Influence of Heterogeneity, Typology, and Contaminants of Recycled Aggregates on the Properties of Concrete. Open Constr. Build. Technol. J. 2020, 14, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maslova, K.; Stepina, I.; Konoplev, A.; Popov, V.; Gusarov, A.; Pankratov, F.; Lee, S.; Ilicheva, N. Fate and transport of radiocesium, radiostrontium and radiocobalt on urban building materials. J. Environ. Radioact. 2013, 125, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Smičiklas, I.; Šljivić, M. Evaluation of factors influencing Co2+ removal by calcinated bone sorbent using experimental design methodology. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 2012, 47, 896–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Doušová, B.; Koloušek, D.; Lhotka, M.; Keppert, M.; Urbanová, M.; Kobera, L.; Brus, J. Waste Brick Dust as Potential Sorbent of Lead and Cesium from Contaminated Water. Materials 2019, 12, 1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kumara, G.M.P.; Kawamoto, K. Applicability of crushed clay brick and municipal solid waste slag as low-cost adsorbents to refine high concentrate Cd(II) and Pb(II) contaminated wastewater. Int. J. GEOMATE 2019, 17, 133–142. Available online: https://geomatejournal.com/geomate/article/view/2157. [CrossRef]
- Doušová, B.; Koloušek, D.; Keppert, M.; Machovič, V.; Lhotka, M.; Urbanová, M.; Brus, J.; Holcová, L. Use of waste ceramics in adsorption technologies. Appl. Clay Sci. 2016, 134, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bohara, G.; Pradhanang Shrestha, S.; Nyachhyon Rajbhandari, A. Brick Powder, an Effectual Adsorbent for the Exclusion of Cr(VI) Ion from Aqueous Solution. Amrit J. 2025, 5, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahat, M.; Shehata, A.M.A. Adsorption of Lead, Cadmium and Zinc Ions from Industrial Wastewater by Using Raw Clay and Broken Clay-Brick Waste. Asian J. Chem. 2013, 25(8), 4284–4288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coleman, N.J.; Lee, W.E.; Slipper, I.J. Interactions of aqueous Cu2+, Zn2+ and Pb2+ ions with crushed concrete fines. J. Hazard. Mater. 2005, 121, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hurt, A.P.; Coleman, A.A.; Coleman, N.J. Interactions of Cr3+, Ni2+, and Sr2+ with Crushed Concrete Fines. Crystals 2022, 12, 717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elmes, V.K.; Coleman, N.J. Interactions of Cd2+, Co2+ and MoO42− Ions with Crushed Concrete Fines. J. Compos. Sci. 2021, 5, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smiljanić, S.; Smičiklas, I.; Perić-Grujić, A.; Lončar, B.; Mitrić, M. Rinsed and thermally treated red mud sorbents for aqueous Ni2+ ions. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 162, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lothenbach, B.; Scrivener, K.; Hooton, R.D. Supplementary cementitious materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 1244–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davidovits, J. Geopolymers: Inorganic polymeric new materials. J. Therm. Anal. 1991, 37, 1633–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korniejenko, K.; Mikuła, J.; Brudny, K.; Aruova, L.; Zhakanov, A.; Jexembayeva, A.; Zhaksylykova, L. A Review of Industrial By-Product Utilization and Future Pathways of Circular Economy: Geopolymers as Modern Materials for Sustainable Building. Sustainability 2025, 17, 4536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, J.; Cai, J.; Li, J. Recycling of unseparated construction and demolition waste (UCDW) through geopolymer technology. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 341, 127771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, X.; Zhang, L. Experimental study of geopolymer concrete produced from waste concrete. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2019, 31, 4019114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmoodi, O.; Siad, H.; Lachemi, M.; Sahmaran, M. Synthesis and optimization of binary systems of brick and concrete wastes geopolymers at ambient environment. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 276, 122217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yıldırım, G.; Kul, A.; Özçelikci, E.; Şahmaran, M.; Aldemir, A.; Figueira, D.; Ashour, A. Development of alkali-activated binders from recycled mixed masonry-originated waste. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 33, 101690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yildirim, G.; Ashour, A.; Ozcelikci, E.; Gunal, M.F.; Ozel, B.F. Development of Geopolymer Binders with Mixed Construction and Demolition Waste-Based Materials. Eng. Proc. 2022, 17, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Retamal-Rojas, M.; Aponte, D.; Valencia-Saavedra, W.; Robayo-Salazar, R.; Barra-Bizinotto, M. Hybrid Binders Through Alkaline Activation of Fine Construction and Demolition Waste. Materials 2025, 18, 3227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Frías, M.; Vigil de la Villa, R.; Martínez-Ramírez, S.; Fernández-Carrasco, L.; Villar-Cociña, E.; García-Giménez, R. Multi-Technique Characterization of a Fine Fraction of CDW and Assessment of Reactivity in a CDW/Lime System. Minerals 2020, 10, 590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komnitsas, K.; Zaharaki, D. Geopolymerisation: A review and prospects for the minerals industry. Miner. Eng. 2007, 20(14), 1261–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Migunthanna, J.; Rajeev, P.; Sanjayan, J. Waste Clay Bricks as a Geopolymer Binder for Pavement Construction. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Y.; Tang, W.; Wu, C.; Zhao, B.; Kou, S. A Comparative Study of Waste Red-Clay Brick Powder (WRCBP) and Fly Ash (FA) as Precursors for Geopolymer Production. Buildings 2025, 15, 4409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharmin, S.; Biswas, W.K.; Sarker, P.K. Exploring the Potential of Using Waste Clay Brick Powder in Geopolymer Applications: A Comprehensive Review. Buildings 2024, 14, 2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manzi, S.; Baldazzi, L.; Saccani, A. Formulating geopolymer mortars through construction and demolition waste recycling. Materials 2023, 16, 7304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shi, C.; Fernández Jiménez, A.; Palomo, A. New cements for the 21st century: The pursuit of an alternative to Portland cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 750–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Snellings, R.; Mertens, G.; Elsen, J. Supplementary cementitious materials. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2012, 74, 211–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poon, C.-S.; Chan, D. The use of recycled aggregate in concrete in Hong Kong. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2007, 50, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Hu, J.; Yu, Q.; Shi, C. Fundamental study on reactive components and leaching kinetics of ceramic waste for geopolymer production. Compos. Part B Eng. 2025, 295, 112211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, J.; Cizer, Ö.; De Vlieger, J.; Dan, H.; Li, J. Impacts of milling duration on construction and demolition waste (CDW) based precursor and resulting geopolymer: Reactivity, geopolymerization and sustainability. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 184, 106433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsimbe, J.; Dinka, M.; Olukanni, D.; Musonda, I. Geopolymer: A Systematic Review of Methodologies. Materials 2022, 15, 6852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, J.; Min, R.; He, Z. Geopolymer Based on Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Fly Ash, Waste Glass Powder, and Metakaolin: Compressive Strength and Microstructure of Mortar and Application in Pavement Concrete Bricks. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 3080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azad, N.M.; Samindi, S.M.; Samarakoon, M.K. Utilization of industrial by-products/waste to manufacture geopolymer cement/concrete. Sustainability 2021, 13, 873–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zedan, S.R.; Maha, M.R.; Doa, A.A.; Aya, M.H. Effect of demolition/construction wastes on the properties of alkali activated slag cement. HBRC J. 2017, 13(3), 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ionescu, B.A.; Lăzărescu, A. A review regarding the use of natural and industrial by-products in the production of geopolymer binders. Proc. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 877, 012033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javed, I.; Saeed, H.; Ekinci, A. Transforming Construction Waste into High-Performance Alkali-Activated Paste with Microstructural and Predictive π Modelling Insights. Buildings 2025, 15, 3830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.; Lei, Y.; Zha, X. Mechanical and Carbonation Performance of Alkali-Activated Mortars Incorporating GGBS and Recycled Construction Spoil. Buildings 2026, 16, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asim, N.; Badiei, M.; Ghoreishi, K. Alkali-Activated and Geopolymer Systems Through the Lens of Resource Efficiency. Resources 2026, 15, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vásquez, A.; Cárdenas, V.; Robayo, R.A.; de Gutiérrez, R.M. Geopolymer based on concrete demolition waste. Adv. Powder Technol. 2016, 27(4), 1173–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernal, S.A.; Provis, J.L.; Rose, V.; de Gutiérrez, R.M. Evolution of binder structure in sodium silicate-activated slag-metakaolin blends. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2011, 33, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Provis, J.L.; Bernal, S.A. Geopolymers and related alkali-activated materials. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2014, 44, 299–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Li, P.; Yu, T.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, Y.; Pei, Y. A State-of-the-Art Review on the Application of Geopolymerization/Geopolymer in Environmental Fields. Buildings 2025, 15, 4054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amran, M.; Al-Fakih, A.; Chu, S.H.; Fediuk, R.; Haruna, S.; Azevedo, A.; Vatin, N. Long-term durability properties of geopolymer concrete: An in-depth review. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2021, 15, e00661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panda, L.; Rath, S.S.; Rao, D.S.; Nayak, B.B.; Das, B.; Misra, P.K. Thorough understanding of the kinetics and mechanism of heavy metal adsorption onto a pyrophyllite mine waste-based geopolymer. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 263, 428–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Genua, F.; Giovini, M.; Leonelli, C.; Lancellotti, I. Chelating, Reducing, and Adsorbing Agents in Geopolymers for Heavy Metals Stabilization from Galvanic Sludge. Polymers 2026, 18, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, J.; Luo, H.; Wang, S.; Ou, X.; Su, J.; Lyu, Z.; Chen, J.; Wei, D. Synthesis of Tailing Slurry-Based Geopolymers for the Highly Efficient Immobilization of Heavy Metals: Behavior and Mechanism. Appl. Clay Sci. 2024, 247, 107199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, B.; Yu, T.; Deng, L.; Li, Y.; Guo, H.; Zhou, J.; Li, L.; Peng, Y. Ion-Adsorption Type Rare Earth Tailings for Preparation of Alkali-Based Geopolymer with Capacity for Heavy Metals Immobilization. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2022, 134, 104768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukiza, E.; Phung, Q.T.; Seetharam, S.C.; Nguyen, T.N.; Bruggeman, C.; De Schutter, G. Recent advances in immobilization of radioactive cesium and strontium-bearing wastes in alkali activated materials – A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 370, 122746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Houhou, M.; Leklou, N.; Ranaivomanana, H.; Penot, J.D.; de Barros, S. Geopolymers in nuclear waste storage and immobilization: Mechanisms, applications, and challenges. Discov. Appl. Sci. 2025, 7, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Ye, J.; Wang, R. Solidification performance and mechanism of typical radioactive nuclear waste by geopolymers and geopolymer ceramics: A review. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2024, 169, 105106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, G.; Parks, G. Sorption of trace elements onto mineral surfaces: Modern perspectives from spectroscopic studies, and comments on sorption in the marine environment. Int. Geol. Rev. 2001, 43, 963–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Han, F.; Mu, J. Solidification/stabilization mechanism of Pb(II), Cd(II), Mn(II) and Cr(III) in fly ash based geopolymers. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 160, 818–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Genua, F.; Giovini, M.; Santoni, E.; Berrettoni, M.; Lancellotti, I.; Leonelli, C. Factors Affecting Consolidation in Geopolymers for Stabilization of Galvanic Sludge. Materials 2025, 18, 3015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahmaruzzaman, M. A review on the utilization of fly ash. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2010, 36, 327–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Eswed, B.I.; Aldagag, O.M.; Khalili, F.I. Efficiency and mechanism of stabilization/solidification of Pb(II), Cd(II), Cu(II), Th(IV) and U(VI) in metakaolin based geopolymers. Appl. Clay Sci. 2017, 140, 148–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Z.; Jiang, Z.; Wu, D.; Peng, X.; Xu, Y.; Li, N.; Qi, Y.; Li, P. Immobilization of strontium-loaded zeolite A by metakaolin based-geopolymer. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 4434–4439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, X.; Xu, Y.; Xu, Z.; Wu, D.; Li, D. Effect of simulated radionuclide strontium on geopolymerization process. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2016, 31, 325–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, Q.; Nakama, S.; Sasaki, K. Immobilization of cesium in fly ash-silica fume based geopolymers with different Si/Al molar ratios. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 687, 1127–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- X Liu, X.; Lu, Y.D.; Lu, X. Immobilization of Simulated Radionuclide 90Sr by Fly Ash-Slag-Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer. Nucl. Technol. 2017, 198, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walkley, B.; Ke, X.; Hussein, O.H.; Bernal, S.A.; Provis, J.L. Incorporation of strontium and calcium in geopolymer gels. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 382, 121015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhu, K.; Zhang, H.; Yuan, C. Microwave-synergistic chemical activation of bayer red mud for geopolymerization. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 118666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Zhou, J.; Chen, S.; Shi, H.; Hu, Q.; Tang, Y. Evaluation of slag and tannery sludge based geopolymer after thermal exposure: Properties, phase transformation and Cr leaching behavior. J. Clean. Prod. 2025, 512, 145716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, J.; De Vlieger, J.; Desomer, P.; Cai, J.; Li, J. Co-disposal of construction and demolition waste (CDW) and municipal solid waste incineration fly ash (MSWI FA) through geopolymer technology. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 362, 132502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melikoglu, M. Quantitative review of waste-based geopolymers: Analysis of progress, performance metrics, and circular economy pathways. Phys. Chem. Earth 2026, 143, 104359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Deventer, J.S.J.; Provis, J.L.; Duxson, P.; Lukey, G.C. Reaction mechanisms in the geopolymeric conversion of inorganic waste to useful products. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 139, 506–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Taki, K.; Mukherjee, S.; Patel, A.K.; Kumar, M. Reappraisal review on geopolymer: A new era of aluminosilicate binder for metal immobilization. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2020, 14, 100345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamil, M.A.-B.; Waleed, M.; Khalid, R.A.B. Mechanical Performance and Environmental Benefits of Ternary Blends of Phosphogypsum, Calcium Carbide Residue, and Rock Demolition Waste for Use in Road Sub-grade. Rock. Mech. Bull. 2025, 100296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanzlicek, T.; Steinerova, M.; Straka, P. Radioactive Metal Isotopes Stabilized in a Geopolymer Matrix: Determination of a Leaching Extract by a Radiotracer Method. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2006, 89, 3541–3543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| C&DW fraction | Main composition | Typical geopolymer role | Reactivity | Main binding products | References |
| Recycled concrete fines | Hydrated cement phases, calcite, silica-rich phases | Hybrid precursor/filler | Medium | C-(A)-S-H and N-(C)-A-S-H | [129,130,131] |
| Brick waste | Amorphous aluminosilicates | Primary precursor | Medium–high | N-A-S-H | [40,109,125,126,127] |
| Ceramic waste | Aluminosilicates, quartz, feldspars | Primary/Supplementary precursor | Medium | N-A-S-H | [31,40,109,125,126,127] |
| Mixed C&DW | Mixed mineral phases | Variable precursor | Low–medium | Mixed gel systems | [23,53,121] |
| C&DW fine dust fraction | Fine amorphous and crystalline phases | Reactive precursor/filler | Variable | N-A-S-H and hybrid gels | [122,123] |
| Aspect | Identified Gap | Implications/Future Needs |
| Immobilization in C&DW-derived geopolymers | Despite existing studies on radionuclide sorption by raw C&DW and on the characteristics of C&DW-derived geopolymers, direct evaluation of radionuclide immobilization in these systems remains limited | Direct immobilization studies in C&DW-derived geopolymers, supported by prior sorption knowledge to interpret retention mechanisms and predict performance, together with the development of standardized approaches enabling comparison between precursor sorption behavior and radionuclide retention in final geopolymer matrices. |
| Sorption vs. encapsulation | Strong evidence for radionuclide sorption on raw C&DW materials [14,36,41,44,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114], but limited direct comparison with geopolymer systems | Studies linking precursor sorption capacity with final geopolymer performance |
| Mechanisms of immobilization | Insufficient quantification of contributions from encapsulation, ion exchange, and chemical bonding, especially in multi-phase systems | Advanced spectroscopic and microstructural studies to resolve radionuclide binding environments |
| Methodological limitations | Immobilization is inferred from short-term leaching tests at low ion concentrations rather than directly demonstrated [164,165,166,167,168,170]. Standardized approaches specifically designed for evaluating radionuclide immobilization in C&DW-derived geopolymer systems are still lacking | Development of validated testing methodologies, including higher loading levels, multi-technique validation (spectroscopy, microscopy), and direct assessment of immobilization mechanisms beyond leaching behavior |
| Multi-ion systems | Most studies focus on single-ion systems (Cs+, Sr2+, Co2+), while real RW contains complex mixtures | Investigation of competitive interactions and multi-component systems |
| Feedstock variability | High heterogeneity of C&DW affects reactivity, phase evolution, and reproducibility | Development of standardized classification and processing protocols |
| Multi-phase complexity (C&DW systems) | Coexistence of N-A-S-H and C-(A)-S-H gels introduces uncertainty in radionuclide partitioning and retention behavior | Systematic studies linking phase assemblage with radionuclide speciation and retention |
| Radionuclide scope | Limited data for environmentally relevant radionuclides (e.g., 137Cs, 90Sr, 60Co, 63Ni) in realistic conditions | Expanded studies under representative waste compositions |
| Cross-waste insights | Limited integration of findings from other waste systems (e.g., mining residues) | Comparative studies to identify transferable immobilization mechanisms (often similar across waste systems), currently underutilized for predicting system behavior |
| Structure–performance relationships | Weak linkage between precursor composition, geopolymerization reactions, and final immobilization efficiency | Development of predictive models for rational material design |
| Mechanical and chemical durability | Long-term integrity under environmental exposure not is not fully verified for recycled-material-based systems [11,146] | Coupled mechanical–chemical durability assessment under realistic conditions |
| Long-term performance | Limited understanding of stability under repository-relevant conditions (carbonation, wet–dry cycles, radiation, groundwater interaction) [146] | Long-term experiments and predictive modelling for multi-decadal to geological timescales |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).