Submitted:
25 June 2026
Posted:
26 June 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. BIPV System: The “Cubo de Innovación CHEC” Case Study
- Solar Tiles (Silicon): The central portion of the building's roof is covered with 30 opaque solar tiles based on mono-crystalline Silicon (Si) technology. This system is designed for maximum power generation in a limited area, covering a total surface of 17.1 m2.
- Solar Pergola System (Cadmium Telluride): An external pergola structure is integrated with 64 semi-transparent modules utilizing Cadmium Telluride (CdTe) thin-film technology. This large-area system, covering 46.1 m2, provides shading and generates electricity while allowing diffuse daylight to pass through.
- Solar Window (Cadmium Telluride): The building's fenestration consists of semi-transparent yellow CdTe photovoltaic glass, covering two windows with a total surface of 3.5 m2 and 20% of transparency These BIPV windows serve the dual purpose of providing a view and natural light, typical of a conventional window, while also contributing to the building's overall power generation.
3. Methodology
3.1. Whole-Building Energy Simulation
3.2. Carbon Footprint Assessment Methodology
- Embodied Carbon (Manufacturing): A "cradle-to-gate" analysis was performed to quantify the embodied carbon associated with the manufacturing of the BIPV cells. First, the embodied emissions for each technology (Si and CdTe) were calculated by multiplying the installed surface area by a technology-specific emission factor, expressed in kgCO2e/m2, using emission factors selected from the literature to correspond with the energy matrix of the manufacturing country (China), ensuring the analysis reflects the project's specific supply chain [11].
- Operational Carbon (Avoided Emissions): The operational carbon footprint is evaluated in terms of avoided emissions, through multiplying the total annual electricity generated by the BIPV system, as determined by a PVSyst simulation, by the official grid emission factor for Colombia. This study uses the most recently published factor from the Unidad de Planeación Minero Energética (UPME), which is 0.177 kgCO2e/kWh for the year 2023 [12]. The equation is:
3.3. Thermal and Visual Comfort Standards
- Thermal Comfort: The analysis adheres to the methodologies prescribed in ASHRAE Standard 55, "Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy" [9] and ISO 7730, "Ergonomics of the thermal environment" [10]. The primary metrics for evaluation are the Predicted Mean Vote (PMV), which predicts the average thermal sensation of a group of people on a 7-point scale, and the Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied (PPD), which estimates the percentage of people likely to feel thermally uncomfortable. According to ASHRAE 55, an environment is considered comfortable when the PMV is within the range of -0.5 to +0.5. The input parameters for the PMV model, distinguishing between measured/simulated, calculated, and assumed values, are detailed in Table 2.
- UNE-EN 12464-1:2022: "Light and lighting. Lighting of work places. Part 1: Indoor work places" [13]. The analysis focuses on illuminance levels (lux) within task areas, where a range of 500–2000 lux is recommended for typical office work.
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Carbon Footprint: A Life Cycle Perspective
4.2. Thermal Comfort in a BIPV-Integrated Envelope
4.3. Performance of Natural Lighting and Visual Comfort
5. Conclusions
References
- UNEP. Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction 2024/2025 | UNEP - UN Environment Programme. Available online: https://www.unep.org/resources/report/global-status-report-buildings-and-construction-20242025 (accessed on Oct. 13 2025).
- IEA, “Buildings - Energy System,” IEA. Available online: https://www.iea.org/energy-system/buildings (accessed on Oct. 13 2025).
- IEA. Building-Integrated Photovoltaics Technical Guidebook. Feb 2025. Available online: https://iea-pvps.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Building-Integrated-Photovoltaics-Technical-Guidebook.pdf.
- Kettle, J.; et al. Review of technology specific degradation in crystalline silicon, cadmium telluride, copper indium gallium selenide, dye sensitised, organic and perovskite solar cells in photovoltaic modules: Understanding how reliability improvements in mature technologies can enhance emerging technologies. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 2022, vol. 30(no. 12), 1365–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vodapally, S. N.; Ali, M. H. A Comprehensive Review of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Technologies, Architecture, and Its Applications to Improved Efficiency. Energies 2023, vol. 16(no. 1), 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hendinata, L. K.; Prilia, R.; Fikri, A. I. R.; Suprapto, M. A.; Siddiq, N. A. Evaluating the Energy Performance of Transparent Photovoltaics for Building Windows in Tropical Climates. Indones. J. Energy 2024, vol. 7(no. 2), 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ASHRAE, “ASHRAE Climate Zones.”. Available online: https://help.iesve.com/ve2021/ashrae_climate_zones.htm (accessed on Oct. 13 2025).
- EnergyPlus. Available online: https://energyplus.net/ (accessed on Oct. 13 2025).
- ASHRAE, “Standard 55 – Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy,” ASHRAE. Available online: https://www.ashrae.org/technical-resources/bookstore/standard-55-thermal-environmental-conditions-for-human-occupancy (accessed on Jun. 20 2025).
- ISO. ISO 7730:2025. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/85803.html (accessed on Jun. 20 2025).
- Wikoff, H. M.; Reese, S. B.; Reese, M. O. “Embodied energy and carbon from the manufacture of cadmium telluride and silicon photovoltaics”. Joule 2022, vol. 6(no. 7), 1710–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UPME. “RESOLUCIÓN No. 001198 de 2024.” UPME, Dec. 26, 2024. Available online: https://www1.upme.gov.co/Normatividad/1198_2024.pdf.
- “UNE-EN 12464-1:2022 Luz e iluminación. Iluminación de los lugares de trabajo. Parte 1: Lugares de trabajo en interiores”. Available online: https://www.une.org/encuentra-tu-norma/busca-tu-norma/norma?c=N0068596 (accessed on Jun. 21 2025).
- ASHRAE. “Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy - ANSI/ASHRAE Addendum h to ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2010”. ASHRAE. 2010. Available online: https://www.ashrae.org/file%20library/technical%20resources/standards%20and%20guidelines/standards%20addenda/55_2010_h_final.pdf.


| BIPV Component | Technology | Area (m2) | Power per module (W) | System Power (kWp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solar Tiles | Silicon (Si) | 17.1 | 88 | 2.64 |
| Solar Pergola | Cadmium Telluride (CdTe) | 46.1 | 92 | 5.88 |
| Solar Windows | Cadmium Telluride (CdTe) | 3.5 | 190 | 0.38 |
| Parameter | Value/Source | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Air Temperature (°C) | EnergyPlus | Simulated |
| Mean Radiant Temp. (°C) | EnergyPlus | Simulated |
| Relative Humidity (%) | EnergyPlus | Simulated |
| Air Velocity (m/s) | 0.1 | Assumed (indoor) |
| Metabolic Rate (met) | 1.0 (seated, reading), 1.1 (typing) | Assumed (Scenario-based) |
| Clothing Level (clo) | 0.57, 0.61, 0.96, 1.01 | Assumed (Scenario-based) |
| Metric | Source | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Embodied Emissions | Si (Roof) | 3,668.76 | kgCO2e |
| Embodied Emissions | CdTe (Pergola) | 3,778.56 | kgCO2e |
| Total Embodied Emissions | All BIPV | 7,447.32 | kgCO2e |
| Annual Energy Consumption | Grid | 1,930.59 | kWh/year |
| Annual Energy Generation | All BIPV | 11,223 | kWh/year |
| Annual Avoided Emissions (Building) | Grid | 341.71 | kgCO2e/year |
| Annual Avoided Emissions (Total) | All BIPV | 1,986.47 | kgCO2e/year |
| Clo value | Clothing description |
|---|---|
| 0.57 | Trousers and a short-sleeved shirt |
| 0.61 | Trousers and a long-sleeved shirt |
| 0.96 | Trousers, a long-sleeved shirt and a suit jacket |
| 1.01 | Trousers, a long-sleeved shirt, a T-shirt, and a long-sleeved sweater |
| Activity (met) | Clothing (clo) | PMV | PPD (%) | Within Comfort Range? (ASHRAE 55) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | 0.57 | -1.52 | 52.15 | No |
| 1.0 | 0.61 | -1.39 | 45.22 | No |
| 1.0 | 0.96 | -0.55 | 11.41 | No |
| 1.0 | 1.01 | -0.36 | 9.50 | Yes |
| 1.1 | 0.57 | -1.13 | 32.11 | No |
| 1.1 | 0.61 | -1.02 | 27.04 | No |
| 1.1 | 0.96 | -0.38 | 6.67 | Yes |
| 1.1 | 1.01 | -0.21 | 5.87 | Yes |
| Location | Avg. Simulated Illuminance (lux) | Standard Requirement (lux) | Compliance/Observation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Central Task Area | ~400 | 500-1000 | Partial |
| Near BIPV Windows | 300-500 | N/A | Controlled, uniform light |
| Near Glass Door | >2500 | N/A | High potential for glare |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).