Submitted:
20 June 2026
Posted:
23 June 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- i.
- Class 0 or the earliest evolutionary phase: The protostars are deeply enshrouded within their natal envelopes that have accreted only a small fraction of their final stellar mass. The sources in this stage typically have bolometric temperatures less than 70 K and spectral indices of . The statistical analyses indicate that the duration of the Class 0 phase is on the order of - years (e.g., André [53], Dunham et al. [54]). This evolutionary stage is also connected to episodic and recurrent accretion events with relatively high mass accretion rates (Fiorellino and Somigliana [47]).
- ii.
- Class I: This stage follows the Class 0 phase. The protostars are still surrounded by large circumstellar envelopes but are generally more optically transparent than in the previous phase. The spectral indices of and the bolometric temperatures of define this phase. It is still an open question whether the majority of the final stellar mass has been formed at this stage. Observations suggest that the Class I phase lasts on average about 100,000 years (Evans et al. [30], Dunham et al. [54]). Class I objects are thought to be subject to enhanced mass accretion, made of repeated and powerful episodic accretion events, which make their growth very dynamic during this evolutionary phase, similarly to Class 0 protostars (Fiorellino and Somigliana [47]).
- iii.
- The flat spectrum stage: This stage (Fiorellino and Somigliana [47]) is usually interpreted as an evolutionary intermediate stage between the protostellar stage and the pre-main-sequence (PMS). Objects in this category have spectral indices in the range () and bolometric temperatures of (. At this stage, these sources are thought to have accumulated most of their eventual stellar mass (e.g., Fiorellino and Somigliana [47]). They are believed to have typical lifetimes of order () yr, but the uncertainties involved remain large (e.g., Evans et al. [30], Greene et al. [55]). Flat- spectrum sources could be explained by objects with relatively low-density envelopes or by objects with denser envelopes but viewed at low inclination angles (Calvet et al. [56], Federman et al. [57]). This stage (Fiorellino and Somigliana [47]) tends to exhibit lower mass accretion rates and infrequent episodic accretion events than the earlier protostellar stages.
- iv.
- Class II (PMS phase): Class II objects are PMS stars with circumstellar disks, but generally without envelopes. They are also called Classical T Tauri stars (CTTSs). They are characterized by and (e.g., Fiorellino and Somigliana [47]), and their stellar masses are basically set (although they are still actively accreting material from the disk around them). The Class II phase typically lasts about two to three mega-years (Evans et al. [30], Haisch et al. [58]).
- v.
- Class III: This is the last SF phase. They have little or no infrared excess, and most of their circumstellar disks have dissipated, consistent with weakly or non-accreting young stars (e.g., Fiorellino and Somigliana [47]). This phase lasts a few mega-years, with characteristic timescales ≳ five to ten mega-years (Haisch et al. [58], Fedele et al. [59]).
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. ATLASGAL Clump Properties
2.2. Clumps Classifications
- 1.
- Quiescents: Cold clumps (10-15 K) without any embedded objects and dark at 70 m.
- 2.
- Protostellar: Clumps visible at 70 m with no counterparts at 3 to 8 m within 12 arcsec of the center of the clump, may have counterparts at 24 m and with an unresolved emission at all mid-infrared.
- 3.
- YSOs: Clumps visible at 3-8 m, 24 m and has an unresolved emission at all mid-infrared wavelengths.
- 4.
- H II regions: Clumps visible at 8, 24 and 70 m wavelengths, either compact or extended with providence of radio emission with the extended 3 to 8 m, infrared bright and associated with high-mass stars.
- 5.
- Photodissociation Regions (PDRs): Areas that display infrared emission but may not have pronounced submillimeter continuum, possibly heated externally by nearby massive stars or H II regions.
2.3. Class I YSOs from MIPSGAL
2.4. Distances and Velocity Dispersions
2.5. Clump Physical Properties
2.6. Caveats of the Dense-Gas Star Formation Calibration
3. Results
3.1. Comparison of Definitions
4. Discussion
4.1. Implications of the Efficiency Comparison
4.1.1. Dense-Gas Star Formation Efficiency and the Limitations of a Universal Class I Timescale
4.2. The Strong Dependence of Cumulative Efficiency on Clump Radius
4.3. The Independence of Cumulative Efficiency on Galactic Environment
4.4. IMF Sampling and the Relationship Between Upper and Lower Cumulative Efficiencies
4.5. Comparison with Theoretical Predictions
4.6. The Interplay Between Instantaneous and Cumulative Efficiency: The Role of Clump Radius
4.7. The Mass Dependence of the Star Formation Timescale
4.7.1. Massive Clumps Evolve More Rapidly
4.7.2. Agreement with Theoretical and Observational Studies
4.7.3. Implications for the Constant 0.50 Myr Assumption
4.8. Uncertainties and Caveats
5. Conclusions
- 1.
- The instantaneous efficiency per free-fall time follows , consistent with the free-fall dependence implied by the adopted dense-gas formalism.
- 2.
- The lower-limit cumulative star formation efficiency increases systematically toward compact clumps, indicating that smaller and denser clumps tend to exhibit larger cumulative star formation efficiencies.
- 3.
- No significant correlation is found between cumulative efficiency and Galactocentric radius, suggesting that variations in local clump properties explain a larger fraction of the observed scatter than Galactocentric distance.
- 4.
- The relation between upper- and lower-limit cumulative efficiencies is sublinear, suggesting incomplete sampling of the stellar initial mass function.
- 5.
- The inferred dense-gas star formation timescale exhibits a strong mass dependence, following with a median value of 0.54 Myr.
- 6.
- Assuming a relatively uniform Class I protostellar lifetime of 0.50 Myr introduces systematic biases in star formation rate estimates, overestimating SFRs in low-mass clumps and underestimating them in massive clumps.
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chevance, M.; Kruijssen, J.D.; Hygate, A.P.; Schruba, A.; Longmore, S.N.; Groves, B.; Henshaw, J.D.; Herrera, C.N.; Hughes, A.; Jeffreson, S.M.; et al. The lifecycle of molecular clouds in nearby star-forming disc galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 493, 2872–2909. [Google Scholar]
- Menon, S.H.; Federrath, C.; Krumholz, M.R. Infrared radiation feedback does not regulate star cluster formation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022, 517, 1313–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menon, S.H.; Lancaster, L.; Burkhart, B.; Somerville, R.S.; Dekel, A.; Krumholz, M.R. The Interplay between the Initial Mass Function and Star Formation Efficiency through Radiative Feedback at High Stellar Surface Densities. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2024, 967, L28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiménez, S.; Kománek, D.; Wünsch, R.; Palouš, J.; Ehlerová, S.; Martínez-González, S.; Srbljanović, A. The star formation factory revisited: I. The impact of metallicity on collapsing star-forming clouds. Astron. Astrophys. 2026, 709, A100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heyer, M.; Gutermuth, R.; Urquhart, J.; Csengeri, T.; Wienen, M.; Leurini, S.; Menten, K.; Wyrowski, F. The rate and latency of star formation in dense, massive clumps in the Milky Way. Astron. Astrophys. 2016, 588, A29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, W.T.; Ostriker, E.C. Formation of spiral-arm spurs and bound clouds in vertically stratified galactic gas disks. Astrophys. J. 2006, 646, 213–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobbs, C.L.; Krumholz, M.R.; Ballesteros-Paredes, J.; Bolatto, A.D.; Fukui, Y.; Heyer, M.; Low, M.; Ostriker, E.C.; Vázquez-Semadeni, E. Formation of molecular clouds and global conditions for star formation. Protostars Plan. VI 2014, 1312, 3–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobbs, C. GMC formation by agglomeration and self gravity. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2008, 391, 844–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Battisti, A.J.; Heyer, M.H. The dense gas mass fraction of molecular clouds in the milky way. Astrophys. J. 2014, 780, 173. [Google Scholar]
- Schneider, N.; Ossenkopf, V.; Csengeri, T.; Klessen, R.S.; Federrath, C.; Tremblin, P.; Girichidis, P.; Bontemps, S.; André, P. Understanding star formation in molecular clouds-I. Effects of line-of-sight contamination on the column density structure. Astron. Astrophys. 2015, 575, A79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vázquez-Semadeni, E.; Gómez, G.C.; Jappsen, A.K.; Ballesteros-Paredes, J.; Klessen, R.S. High-and low-mass star-forming regions from hierarchical gravitational fragmentation. High local star formation rates with low global efficiencies. Astrophys. J. 2009, 707, 1023–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larson, R.B. Turbulence and star formation in molecular clouds. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1981, 194, 809–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKee, C.F.; Tan, J.C. The formation of massive stars from turbulent cores. Astrophys. J. 2003, 585, 850–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKee, C.F.; Ostriker, E.C. Theory of star formation. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2007, 45, 565–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grudić, M.Y.; Hopkins, P.F.; Lee, E.J.; Murray, N.; Faucher-Giguère, C.A.; Johnson, L.C. On the nature of variations in the measured star formation efficiency of molecular clouds. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019, 488, 1501–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, E.J.; Miville-Deschênes, M.A.; Murray, N.W. Observational evidence of dynamic star formation rate in milky way giant molecular clouds. Astrophys. J. 2016, 833, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krumholz, M.R.; Tan, J.C. Slow star formation in dense gas: evidence and implications. Astrophys. J. 2007, 654, 304–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leroy, A.K.; Schinnerer, E.; Hughes, A.; Kruijssen, J.D.; Meidt, S.; Schruba, A.; Sun, J.; Bigiel, F.; Aniano, G.; Blanc, G.A.; et al. Cloud-scale ISM structure and star formation in M51. Astrophys. J. 2017, 846, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Utomo, D.; Sun, J.; Leroy, A.K.; Kruijssen, J.D.; Schinnerer, E.; Schruba, A.; Bigiel, F.; Blanc, G.A.; Chevance, M.; Emsellem, E.; et al. Star formation efficiency per free-fall time in nearby galaxies. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2018, 861, L18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mattern, M.; André, P.; Zavagno, A.; Russeil, D.; Roussel, H.; Peretto, N.; Schuller, F.; Shimajiri, Y.; Di Francesco, J.; Arzoumanian, D.; et al. Understanding the star formation efficiency in dense gas: Initial results from the CAFFEINE survey with ArTéMiS. Astron. Astrophys. 2024, 688, A163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soam, A.; Eswaraiah, C.; Seta, A.; Dewangan, L.; Maheswar, G. Turbulence and magnetic fields in star formation. J. Astrophys. Astron. 2024, 45, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Escamilla, A.; Grudić, M.Y.; Rosen, A.L. Bridging Theory and Observation: Synthetic Far-infrared Insights into Star Formation Efficiency. Astrophys. J. 2026, 1004, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soler, J.; Zari, E.; Elia, D.; Molinari, S.; Mininni, C.; Schisano, E.; Traficante, A.; Klessen, R.; Glover, S.; Hennebelle, P.; et al. A comparison of the Milky Way’s recent star formation revealed by dust thermal emission and high-mass stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2023, 678, A95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, J.C.; Krumholz, M.R.; McKee, C.F. Equilibrium star cluster formation. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2006, 641, L121–L124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, A.; Shu, F.H. A toy model of giant molecular clouds. Astrophys. J. 2000, 536, 368–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krumholz, M.R.; McKee, C.F. A general theory of turbulence-regulated star formation, from spirals to ultraluminous infrared galaxies. Astrophys. J. 2005, 630, 250–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Mac Low, M.M.; Klessen, R.S. Control of star formation in galaxies by gravitational instability. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2005, 620, L19–L22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blitz, L.; Fukui, Y.; Kawamura, A.; Leroy, A.; Mizuno, N.; Rosolowsky, E. Giant molecular clouds in local group galaxies. arXiv 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Clark, P.C.; Bonnell, I.A. Star formation in transient molecular clouds. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2004, 347, L36–L40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evans, N.J.; Dunham, M.M.; Jørgensen, J.K.; Enoch, M.L.; Merín, B.; Van Dishoeck, E.F.; Alcalá, J.M.; Myers, P.C.; Stapelfeldt, K.R.; Huard, T.L.; et al. The Spitzer c2d legacy results: star-formation rates and efficiencies; evolution and lifetimes. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2009, 181, 321–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heiderman, A.; Evans, N.J.; Allen, L.E.; Huard, T.; Heyer, M. The star formation rate and gas surface density relation in the milky way: implications for extragalactic studies. Astrophys. J. 2010, 723, 1019–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rebull, L.M.; Padgett, D.L.; McCabe, C.E.; Hillenbrand, L.A.; Stapelfeldt, K.R.; Noriega-Crespo, A.; Carey, S.J.; Brooke, T.; Huard, T.; Terebey, S.; et al. The taurus spitzer survey: New candidate taurus members selected using sensitive mid-infrared photometry. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2010, 186, 259–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salpeter, E.E. The luminosity function and stellar evolution. Astrophys. J. vol. 121, 161 1955, 121, 161.
- Jerabkova, T.; Romano, D.; Kroupa, P.; André, P.; Chruślińska, M.; Fontanot, F.; Hopkins, A.; Jadhav, V.; Lahén, N.; Lee, Y.N.; et al. Cosmic Threads: Interlinking the Stellar Initial Mass Function from Star-Birth to Galaxies. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2509.06886. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, Z.; Romano, D.; Yan, Z.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Fu, X.; Xie, L.; Jerabkova, T.; De Lucia, G.; Hirschmann, M.; Fontanot, F.; et al. Limited imprint of high-mass IMF variations on sodium abundances in main-sequence galaxies. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2605.26221. [Google Scholar]
- Kennicutt; Jr, R.C. The global Schmidt law in star-forming galaxies. Astrophys. J. 1998, 498, 541–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernardi, M.; Sheth, R.; Dominguez-Sanchez, H.; Fischer, J.; Chae, K.; Huertas-Company, M.; Shankar, F. M*/L gradients driven by IMF variation: large impact on dynamical stellar mass estimates. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018, 477, 2560–2571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haslbauer, M.; Yan, Z.; Jerabkova, T.; Gjergo, E.; Kroupa, P.; Hasani Zonoozi, A. The effect of the environment-dependent stellar initial mass function on the photometric properties of star-forming galaxies. Astron. Astrophys. 2024, 689, A221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madau, P.; Dickinson, M. Cosmic star-formation history. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2014, 52, 415–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Annibali, F.; Tosi, M. Chemical and stellar properties of star-forming dwarf galaxies. Nat. Astron. 2022, 6, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gutermuth, R.; Pipher, J.; Megeath, S.; Myers, P.; Allen, L.; Allen, T. A correlation between surface densities of young stellar objects and gas in eight nearby molecular clouds. Astrophys. J. 2011, 739, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bigiel, F.; Leroy, A.; Walter, F.; Brinks, E.; De Blok, W.; Madore, B.; Thornley, M.D. The star formation law in nearby galaxies on sub-kpc scales. Astron. J. 2008, 136, 2846–2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Evans, N.J., II; Gao, Y.; Solomon, P.M.; Shirley, Y.L.; Vanden Bout, P.A. Connecting dense gas tracers of star formation in our galaxy to high-z star formation. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2005, 635, L173–L176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Y.; Solomon, P.M. HCN survey of normal spiral, infrared-luminous, and ultraluminous galaxies. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2004a, 152, 63–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Zhou, J.; Esimbek, J.; Baan, W.; Tang, X.; Li, D.; He, Y.; Wu, G.; Zhou, D.; Ma, Y.; et al. Coevolution of Giant Molecular Clouds, Filaments, and Clumps as a Function of the Dense Gas Mass Fraction. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2024, 275, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carey, S.; Noriega-Crespo, A.; Mizuno, D.; Shenoy, S.; Paladini, R.; Kraemer, K.; Price, S.; Flagey, N.; Ryan, E.; Ingalls, J.; et al. MIPSGAL: A Survey of the Inner Galactic Plane at 24 and 70 μm. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 2009, 121, 76–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fiorellino, E.; Somigliana, A. The Accretion Process on Protostars. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2605.13189. [Google Scholar]
- Lada, C.J. Star formation: from OB associations to protostars. In Proceedings of the Symposium-International astronomical union; Cambridge University Press, 1987; Vol. 115, pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- Myers, P.; Ladd, E. Bolometric temperatures of young stellar objects. Astrophys. J. Part 2-Letters (ISSN 0004-637X) 1993, vol. 413(no. 1 413), L47-L50. L47–L50. [Google Scholar]
- Andre, P.; Ward-Thompson, D.; Barsony, M. Submillimeter continuum observations of Rho Ophiuchi A-The candidate protostar VLA 1623 and prestellar clumps. Astrophys. J. Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X) 1993, vol. 406(no. 1 406), 122-141. 122–141. [Google Scholar]
- Kryukova, E.; Megeath, S.; Gutermuth, R.; Pipher, J.; Allen, T.; Allen, L.; Myers, P.; Muzerolle, J. Luminosity functions of Spitzer-identified protostars in nine nearby molecular clouds. Astron. J. 2012, 144, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Furlan, E.; Fischer, W.; Ali, B.; Stutz, A.; Stanke, T.; Tobin, J.; Megeath, S.; Osorio, M.; Hartmann, L.; Calvet, N.; et al. The Herschel orion protostar survey: spectral energy distributions and fits using a Grid of protostellar models. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2016, 224, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- André, P. Ward-Thompson, D., Barsony, M. 2000. Protostars Plan. IV 2000. [CrossRef]
- Dunham, M.M.; Vorobyov, E.I.; Arce, H.G. On the reliability of protostellar disc mass measurements and the existence of fragmenting discs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2014, 444, 887–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greene, T.P.; Wilking, B.A.; Andre, P.; Young, E.T.; Lada, C.J. Further mid-infrared study of the rho Ophiuchi cloud young stellar population: Luminosities and masses of pre-main-sequence stars. Astrophys. J. Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X) vol. 434(no. 2 434), 614-626 1994 614–626.
- Calvet, N.; Hartmann, L.; Kenyon, S.; Whitney, B. Flat spectrum T Tauri stars: The case for infall. Astrophys. J. Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X) 1994, vol. 434(no. 1 434), 330-340 330–340. [Google Scholar]
- Federman, S.; Megeath, S.T.; Tobin, J.J.; Sheehan, P.D.; Pokhrel, R.; Habel, N.; Stutz, A.M.; Fischer, W.J.; Hartmann, L.; Stanke, T.; et al. 300: An ACA 870 μ m Continuum Survey of Orion Protostars and Their Evolution. Astrophys. J. 2023, 944, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haisch; Jr, K.E.; Lada, E.A.; Lada, C.J. Disk frequencies and lifetimes in young clusters. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2001, 553, L153–L156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fedele, D.; Van Den Ancker, M.; Henning, T.; Jayawardhana, R.; Oliveira, J. Timescale of mass accretion in pre-main-sequence stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2010, 510, A72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Enoch, M.L.; Evans, N.J.; Sargent, A.I.; Glenn, J. Properties of the youngest protostars in Perseus, Serpens, and Ophiuchus. Astrophys. J. 2009, 692, 973–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masunaga, H.; Inutsuka, S.i. A radiation hydrodynamic model for protostellar collapse. II. The second collapse and the birth of a protostar. Astrophys. J. 2000, 531, 350–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robitaille, T.P.; Whitney, B.A.; Indebetouw, R.; Wood, K.; Denzmore, P. Interpreting spectral energy distributions from young stellar objects. I. A grid of 200,000 YSO model SEDs. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2006, 167, 256–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dunham, M.M.; Evans, N.J.; Terebey, S.; Dullemond, C.P.; Young, C.H. Evolutionary signatures in the formation of low-mass protostars. II. Toward reconciling models and observations. Astrophys. J. 2010, 710, 470–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gutermuth, R.; Megeath, S.; Myers, P.; Allen, L.; Pipher, J.; Fazio, G. A spitzer survey of young stellar clusters within one kiloparsec of the sun: cluster core extraction and basic structural analysis. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2009, 184, 18–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heiderman, A.; Evans, N.J., II. The Gould Belt “MISFITS” survey: The real solar neighborhood protostars. Astrophys. J. 2015, 806, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Kainulainen, J.; Mattern, M.; Fang, M.; Henning, T. Star-forming content of the giant molecular filaments in the Milky Way. Astron. Astrophys. 2019, 622, A52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Román-Zúñiga, C.G.; Palau, A.; Ballesteros-Paredes, J.; Zamora-Avilés, M.; Peltonen, J.; Gutiérrez-Davila, K. Comparing the M gas–N yso relation inside a giant molecular cloud. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2026, 547, stag510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rawat, V.; Samal, M.; Zavagno, A.; Dib, S.; Elia, D.; Jose, J.; Ojha, D.; Srivastav, K. Star formation efficiency and scaling relations in parsec-scale cluster-forming clumps. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2025, 540, 2377–2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, S.R.; Jose, J.; Samal, M.R.; Zhang, S.; Panwar, N. Testing the star formation scaling relations in the clumps of the North American and Pelican nebulae cloud complex. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021, 500, 3123–3141. [Google Scholar]
- Kroupa, P. On the variation of the initial mass function. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2001, 322, 231–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shimajiri, Y.; André, P.; Braine, J.; Könyves, V.; Schneider, N.; Bontemps, S.; Ladjelate, B.; Roy, A.; Gao, Y.; Chen, H. Testing the universality of the star-formation efficiency in dense molecular gas. Astron. Astrophys. 2017, 604, A74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wienen, M.; Wyrowski, F.; Schuller, F.; Menten, K.; Walmsley, C.; Bronfman, L.; Motte, F. Ammonia from cold high-mass clumps discovered in the inner Galactic disk by the ATLASGAL survey. Astron. Astrophys. 2012, 544, A146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schuller, F.; Menten, K.; Contreras, Y.; Wyrowski, F.; Schilke, P.; Bronfman, L.; Henning, T.; Walmsley, C.; Beuther, H.; Bontemps, S.; et al. ATLASGAL–The APEX telescope large area survey of the galaxy at 870 m. Astron. Astrophys. 2009, 504, 415–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Csengeri, T.; Urquhart, J.; Schuller, F.; Motte, F.; Bontemps, S.; Wyrowski, F.; Menten, K.; Bronfman, L.; Beuther, H.; Henning, T.; et al. The ATLASGAL survey: a catalog of dust condensations in the Galactic plane. Astron. Astrophys. 2014, 565, A75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertin, E.; Arnouts, S. SExtractor: Software for source extraction. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 1996, 117, 393–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urquhart, J.; Csengeri, T.; Wyrowski, F.; Schuller, F.; Bontemps, S.; Bronfman, L.; Menten, K.; Walmsley, C.; Contreras, Y.; Beuther, H.; et al. ATLASGAL–Complete compact source catalogue: 280°<ℓ <60°. Astron. Astrophys. 2014a, 568, A41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Contreras, Y.; Schuller, F.; Urquhart, J.; Csengeri, T.; Wyrowski, F.; Beuther, H.; Bontemps, S.; Bronfman, L.; Henning, T.; Menten, K.; et al. ATLASGAL–compact source catalogue: 330°<ℓ <21°. Astron. Astrophys. 2013, 549, A45. [Google Scholar]
- Urquhart, J.; Wells, M.; Pillai, T.; Leurini, S.; Giannetti, A.; Moore, T.; Thompson, M.; Figura, C.; Colombo, D.; Yang, A.; et al. ATLASGAL–evolutionary trends in high-mass star formation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022, 510, 3389–3407. [Google Scholar]
- Asogwa, M.O.; Negu, S.H.; Kumssa, G.M.; Eya, I.O. The Influential Roles of Gravity, Turbulence, and Magnetic Fields in Shaping the Physical Evolution of Dense Massive Clumps. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2026, 26, 035001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gutermuth, R.A.; Heyer, M. A 24 μ m POINT SOURCE CATALOG OF THE GALACTIC PLANE FROM SPITZER/MIPSGAL. Astron. J. 2015, 149, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wienen, M.; Wyrowski, F.; Menten, K.; Urquhart, J.; Csengeri, T.; Walmsley, C.; Bontemps, S.; Russeil, D.; Bronfman, L.; Koribalski, B.; et al. ATLASGAL–Kinematic distances and the dense gas mass distribution of the inner Galaxy. Astron. Astrophys. 2015, 579, A91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellsworth-Bowers, T.P.; Rosolowsky, E.; Glenn, J.; Ginsburg, A.; Evans, N.J., II; Battersby, C.; Shirley, Y.L.; Svoboda, B. THE BOLOCAM GALACTIC PLANE SURVEY. XII. DISTANCE CATALOG EXPANSION USING KINEMATIC ISOLATION OF DENSE MOLECULAR CLOUD STRUCTURES WITH 13CO (1–0). Astrophys. J. 2015, 799, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reid, M.; Menten, K.; Zheng, X.; Brunthaler, A.; Moscadelli, L.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, B.; Sato, M.; Honma, M.; Hirota, T.; et al. Trigonometric parallaxes of massive star-forming regions. VI. Galactic structure, fundamental parameters, and noncircular motions. Astrophys. J. 2009, 700, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ossenkopf, V.; Henning, T. Dust opacities for protostellar cores. Astron. Astrophys. (ISSN 0004-6361) vol. 291(no. 3 291), 943-959 1994 943–959.
- Myers, P. Dense cores in dark clouds. III-Subsonic turbulence. Astrophys. J. Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X) Research supported by the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. 1983, 270, 105–118.. 1983, vol. 270, 105–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lada, E.A. Global star formation in the L1630 molecular cloud. Astrophys. J. Part 2-Letters (ISSN 0004-637X) Research supported by Amelia Earhart Fellowship. 1992, 393, L25–L28.. 1992, vol. 393(no. 1), L25–L28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padoan, P.; Haugbølle, T.; Nordlund, Å. A simple law of star formation. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2012, 759, L27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dunham, M.M.; Allen, L.E.; Evans, N.J., II; Broekhoven-Fiene, H.; Cieza, L.A.; Di Francesco, J.; Gutermuth, R.A.; Harvey, P.M.; Hatchell, J.; Heiderman, A.; et al. Young stellar objects in the Gould Belt. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2015, 220, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meidt, S.E.; Glover, S.C.; Klessen, R.S.; Leroy, A.K.; Sun, J.; Agertz, O.; Emsellem, E.; Henshaw, J.D.; Neumann, L.; Rosolowsky, E.; et al. Reconciling extragalactic star formation efficiencies with theory: Insights from PHANGS. Astron. Astrophys. 2025, 700, A123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schinnerer, E.; Leroy, A.K. Molecular Gas and the Star Formation Process on Cloud Scales in Nearby Galaxies. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2403.19843. [Google Scholar]
- Jiao, Q.; Gao, Y.; Tan, Q.; Gao, Y. Dense gas star formation efficiency and the L HCN (4- 3)’/LHCO+(4- 3)’ ratio: insights from a statistical study of infrared bright star-forming galaxies. Front. Astron. Space Sci. 2023, 10, 1246978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kruijssen, J.D.; Longmore, S.N.; Elmegreen, B.G.; Murray, N.; Bally, J.; Testi, L.; Kennicutt, R.C., Jr. What controls star formation in the central 500 pc of the Galaxy? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2014, 440, 3370–3391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urquhart, J.; Figura, C.; Cross, J.; Wells, M.; Moore, T.; Eden, D.; Ragan, S.; Pettitt, A.R.; Duarte-Cabral, A.; Colombo, D.; et al. SEDIGISM-ATLASGAL: dense gas fraction and star formation efficiency across the Galactic disc. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021, 500, 3050–3063. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, Y.; Solomon, P.M. The star formation rate and dense molecular gas in galaxies. Astrophys. J. 2004b, 606, 271–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kennicutt, R.C., Jr.; Evans, N.J. Star formation in the Milky Way and nearby galaxies. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2012, 50, 531–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lada, C.J.; Lombardi, M.; Alves, J.F. On the star formation rates in molecular clouds. Astrophys. J. 2010, 724, 687–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeřábková, T.; Hasani Zonoozi, A.; Kroupa, P.; Beccari, G.; Yan, Z.; Vazdekis, A.; Zhang, Z.Y. Impact of metallicity and star formation rate on the time-dependent, galaxy-wide stellar initial mass function. Astron. Astrophys. 2018, 620, A39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Tian, H.; Fu, X.; Li, J.; Yan, Z.Q. Stellar initial mass function varies with metallicity and time. Nature 2023, 613, 460–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guo, Z.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Yan, Z.; Gjergo, E.; Man, A.W.; Ivison, R.; Fu, X.; Shi, Y. First detection of CO isotopologues in a high-redshift main-sequence galaxy: evidence of a top-heavy stellar initial mass function. Astrophys. J. 2024, 970, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kroupa, P.; Gjergo, E.; Jerabkova, T.; Yan, Z. The initial mass function of stars. In Encyclopedia of Astrophysics (First Edition), First Edition ed.; Mandel, I., Ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, 2026; pp. 173–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Federrath, C. The origin of physical variations in the star formation law. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2013, 436, 3167–3172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Myers, P.; Dame, T.; Thaddeus, P.; Cohen, R.; Silverberg, R.; Dwek, E.; Hauser, M. Molecular clouds and star formation in the inner galaxy-A comparison of CO, H II, and far-infrared surveys. Astrophys. J. Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X) 1986, 301, 398–422.. 1986, vol. 301, 398–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, J.P.; McKee, C.F. The galactic distribution of OB associations in molecular clouds. Astrophys. J. 1997, 476, 166–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murray, N. Star formation efficiencies and lifetimes of giant molecular clouds in the Milky Way. Astrophys. J. 2011, 729, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vutisalchavakul, N.; Evans, N.J., II; Heyer, M. Star formation relations in the Milky Way. Astrophys. J. 2016, 831, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ochsendorf, B.B.; Meixner, M.; Roman-Duval, J.; Rahman, M.; Evans, N.J. What sets the massive star formation rates and efficiencies of giant molecular clouds? Astrophys. J. 2017, 841, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lada, C.J.; Forbrich, J.; Lombardi, M.; Alves, J.F. Star formation rates in molecular clouds and the nature of the extragalactic scaling relations. Astrophys. J. 2012, 745, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakamura, F.; Li, Z.Y. Clustered star formation in magnetic clouds: properties of dense cores formed in outflow-driven turbulence. Astrophys. J. 2011, 740, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cunningham, A.J.; Krumholz, M.R.; McKee, C.F.; Klein, R.I. The effects of magnetic fields and protostellar feedback on low-mass cluster formation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018, 476, 771–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hull, C.L.; Zhang, Q. Interferometric observations of magnetic fields in forming stars. Front. Astron. Space Sci. 2019, 6, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pattle, K.; Fissel, L.; Tahani, M.; Liu, T.; Ntormousi, E. Magnetic fields in star formation: from clouds to cores. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2203.11179. [Google Scholar]
- Dik, C.; De Marchi, G. Photometric determination of the mass accretion rates of pre-main sequence stars. IX. Recent star formation in the periphery of NGC 346. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2605.12486. [Google Scholar]
- Vlasblom, M.; De Marchi, G. Photometric determination of the mass accretion rates of pre-main-sequence stars-VIII. Recent star formation in NGC 299. Astron. Astrophys. 2023, 675, A204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsilia, S.; De Marchi, G.; Panagia, N. Photometric determination of the mass accretion rates of pre-main-sequence stars-VII. The low-density cluster NGC 376 in the Small Magellanic Cloud. Astron. Astrophys. 2023, 675, A203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fiorellino, E.; Manara, C.F.; Nisini, B.; Ramsay, S.; Antoniucci, S.; Giannini, T.; Biazzo, K.; Alcalà, J.; Fedele, D. KMOS study of the mass accretion rate from Class I to Class II in NGC 1333. Astron. Astrophys. 2021, 650, A43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le Gouellec, V.J.; Greene, T.P.; Hillenbrand, L.A.; Yates, Z. New Insights on the Accretion Properties of Class 0 Protostars from 2 μ m Spectroscopy. Astrophys. J. 2024, 966, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- White, R.J.; Hillenbrand, L.A. On the evolutionary status of class I stars and Herbig-Haro energy sources in Taurus-Auriga. Astrophys. J. 2004, 616, 998–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunawardhana, M.L.; Hopkins, A.M.; Sharp, R.G.; Brough, S.; Taylor, E.; Bland-Hawthorn, J.; Maraston, C.; Tuffs, R.J.; Popescu, C.C.; Wijesinghe, D.; et al. Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): the star formation rate dependence of the stellar initial mass function. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2011, 415, 1647–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, Z.; Jerabkova, T.; Kroupa, P. The star formation timescale of elliptical galaxies-Fitting [Mg/Fe] and total metallicity simultaneously. Astron. Astrophys. 2019, 632, A110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, Z.; Jeřábková, T.; Kroupa, P. Downsizing revised: Star formation timescales for elliptical galaxies with an environment-dependent IMF and a number of SNIa. Astron. Astrophys. 2021, 655, A19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.C.; Gil de Paz, A.; Tremonti, C.; Kennicutt, R.C., Jr.; Salim, S.; Bothwell, M.; Calzetti, D.; Dalcanton, J.; Dale, D.; Engelbracht, C.; et al. Comparison of Hα and UV star formation rates in the local volume: systematic discrepancies for dwarf galaxies. Astrophys. J. 2009, 706, 599–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chávez, R.; González-Lópezlira, R.A.; Bruzual, G. The youngest star clusters in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2025, 538, 2989–3000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]








| ATLASGAL name | Evolutionary | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| () | (pc) | (kpc) | () | (Myr) | (Myr) | (Myr) | phase | |||||
| AGAL005.397+00.194 | 142 | 0.38 | 5.62 | 8948.87 | 0.0129 | 0.0612 | 0.0086 | 0.0040 | 0.33 | 1.06 | 5.05 | Protostellar |
| AGAL005.617-00.082 | 37030 | 5.24 | 16.33 | 888.08 | 0.0002 | 0.0086 | 0.0004 | 0.0123 | 1.03 | 0.02 | 0.72 | Protostellar |
| AGAL007.166+00.131 | 2223 | 0.75 | 2.11 | 18203.97 | 0.0021 | 0.0453 | 0.0009 | 0.0028 | 0.23 | 0.17 | 3.72 | Protostellar |
| AGAL007.333-00.567 | 567 | 0.63 | 4.96 | 7826.00 | 0.0066 | 0.1016 | 0.0047 | 0.0042 | 0.35 | 0.55 | 8.47 | YSO |
| AGAL007.636-00.192 | 1276 | 0.77 | 1.45 | 9663.41 | 0.0055 | 0.1962 | 0.0034 | 0.0037 | 0.31 | 0.46 | 16.44 | YSO |
| AGAL008.206+00.191 | 90 | 0.21 | 5.75 | 33583.77 | 0.0239 | 0.1461 | 0.0083 | 0.0020 | 0.17 | 2.03 | 12.42 | Protostellar |
| AGAL008.544-00.341 | 374 | 0.40 | 4.01 | 20177.48 | 0.0081 | 0.0894 | 0.0036 | 0.0026 | 0.22 | 0.69 | 7.56 | Protostellar |
| AGAL008.706-00.414 | 15356 | 3.17 | 3.56 | 1667.28 | 0.0005 | 0.0049 | 0.0007 | 0.0090 | 0.75 | 0.04 | 0.41 | Protostellar |
| AGAL008.954-00.532 | 9264 | 3.36 | 5.21 | 843.85 | 0.0014 | 0.0113 | 0.0030 | 0.0127 | 1.06 | 0.12 | 0.94 | Protostellar |
| AGAL010.404-00.201 | 309 | 0.39 | 6.20 | 17999.81 | 0.0079 | 0.0669 | 0.0037 | 0.0028 | 0.23 | 0.65 | 5.50 | Protostellar |
| AGAL010.742-00.126 | 781 | 0.73 | 4.88 | 6941.33 | 0.0028 | 0.0192 | 0.0021 | 0.0044 | 0.37 | 0.24 | 1.61 | Protostellar |
| AGAL010.991-00.082 | 702 | 0.86 | 5.33 | 3810.92 | 0.0028 | 0.0166 | 0.0028 | 0.0060 | 0.50 | 0.23 | 1.38 | Quiescent |
| AGAL012.496-00.222 | 362 | 0.51 | 5.09 | 9425.23 | 0.0181 | 0.2048 | 0.0118 | 0.0038 | 0.32 | 1.52 | 17.25 | Quiescent |
| AGAL013.259-00.409 | 579 | 0.63 | 4.92 | 7996.13 | 0.0029 | 0.0144 | 0.0020 | 0.0041 | 0.34 | 0.24 | 1.19 | HII region |
| AGAL014.707-00.156 | 582 | 0.73 | 4.96 | 5171.97 | 0.0229 | 0.1050 | 0.0202 | 0.0052 | 0.43 | 1.89 | 8.68 | Protostellar |
| AGAL014.851-00.990 | 217 | 0.25 | 5.99 | 47976.81 | 0.0122 | 0.1103 | 0.0035 | 0.0017 | 0.14 | 1.00 | 9.08 | YSO |
| AGAL015.531-00.407 | 382 | 0.52 | 5.13 | 9391.20 | 0.0105 | 0.1684 | 0.0068 | 0.0038 | 0.32 | 0.88 | 14.18 | YSO |
| AGAL016.318-00.531 | 7069 | 1.55 | 4.75 | 6567.04 | 0.0012 | 0.0616 | 0.0009 | 0.0046 | 0.38 | 0.10 | 5.09 | YSO |
| AGAL016.418-00.634 | 1308 | 0.80 | 4.92 | 8812.76 | 0.0013 | 0.0066 | 0.0009 | 0.0040 | 0.33 | 0.11 | 0.54 | Quiescent |
| AGAL016.442-00.384 | 178 | 0.31 | 4.92 | 20653.85 | 0.0200 | 0.2460 | 0.0086 | 0.0025 | 0.21 | 1.68 | 20.66 | Protostellar |
| AGAL016.459-00.669 | 292 | 0.42 | 4.92 | 13610.44 | 0.0137 | 0.2086 | 0.0072 | 0.0031 | 0.26 | 1.15 | 17.50 | YSO |
| AGAL016.986-00.922 | 10944 | 2.89 | 5.13 | 1565.20 | 0.0012 | 0.0249 | 0.0018 | 0.0093 | 0.78 | 0.10 | 2.09 | Protostellar |
| AGAL018.231+00.652 | 3728 | 1.31 | 5.37 | 5716.39 | 0.0016 | 0.0561 | 0.0014 | 0.0049 | 0.41 | 0.13 | 4.69 | YSO |
| AGAL018.286-00.707 | 6137 | 2.19 | 5.13 | 2017.75 | 0.0007 | 0.0124 | 0.0009 | 0.0083 | 0.69 | 0.06 | 1.03 | Protostellar |
| AGAL018.549+00.036 | 2571 | 0.86 | 5.54 | 13950.70 | 0.0028 | 0.1183 | 0.0015 | 0.0031 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 9.92 | Protostellar |
| AGAL018.606-00.074 | 558 | 0.56 | 5.21 | 10990.43 | 0.0053 | 0.0597 | 0.0031 | 0.0035 | 0.29 | 0.44 | 4.95 | Protostellar |
| AGAL018.789-00.286 | 612 | 0.67 | 4.42 | 7043.40 | 0.0114 | 0.3357 | 0.0085 | 0.0044 | 0.37 | 0.96 | 28.23 | YSO |
| AGAL019.539-00.456 | 731 | 0.81 | 4.51 | 4763.65 | 0.0053 | 0.0872 | 0.0048 | 0.0054 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 7.27 | YSO |
| AGAL019.977-00.214 | 2740 | 1.29 | 5.21 | 4423.39 | 0.0020 | 0.0557 | 0.0018 | 0.0055 | 0.46 | 0.17 | 4.66 | YSO |
| AGAL021.563-00.132 | 2817 | 1.46 | 3.39 | 3127.00 | 0.0025 | 0.0994 | 0.0028 | 0.0066 | 0.55 | 0.21 | 8.28 | PDR |
| AGAL022.376+00.447 | 477 | 0.45 | 5.25 | 18101.89 | 0.0034 | 0.0134 | 0.0016 | 0.0028 | 0.23 | 0.28 | 1.10 | Protostellar |
| () | (pc) | (kpc) | () | (Myr) | (Myr) | (Myr) | phase | |||||
| AGAL022.434-00.169 | 6073 | 1.62 | 6.20 | 4933.79 | 0.0017 | 0.1163 | 0.0015 | 0.0053 | 0.44 | 0.14 | 9.66 | YSO |
| AGAL022.484-00.936 | 410 | 0.57 | 4.75 | 7655.87 | 0.0067 | 0.0633 | 0.0047 | 0.0042 | 0.35 | 0.56 | 5.28 | Protostellar |
| AGAL022.559+00.171 | 42 | 0.19 | 6.99 | 21164.24 | 0.0536 | 0.3119 | 0.0238 | 0.0025 | 0.21 | 4.50 | 26.20 | Protostellar |
| AGAL022.699+00.404 | 1731 | 1.21 | 3.60 | 3375.39 | 0.0020 | 0.0293 | 0.0021 | 0.0064 | 0.53 | 0.17 | 2.43 | Quiescent |
| AGAL022.832-00.437 | 879 | 0.70 | 4.88 | 8846.79 | 0.0061 | 0.1561 | 0.0041 | 0.0039 | 0.33 | 0.52 | 13.21 | YSO |
| AGAL027.016+00.202 | 553 | 0.53 | 4.38 | 12827.84 | 0.0109 | 0.2842 | 0.0060 | 0.0032 | 0.27 | 0.92 | 23.98 | YSO |
| AGAL028.608-00.027 | 2062 | 0.42 | 5.87 | 96293.88 | 0.0050 | 0.2793 | 0.0010 | 0.0012 | 0.10 | 0.42 | 23.28 | PDR |
| AGAL028.841+00.494 | 696 | 0.54 | 4.59 | 15277.72 | 0.0086 | 0.2321 | 0.0043 | 0.0030 | 0.25 | 0.72 | 19.34 | YSO |
| AGAL028.881-00.021 | 525 | 0.46 | 4.34 | 18646.31 | 0.0152 | 0.4554 | 0.0071 | 0.0028 | 0.23 | 1.25 | 37.41 | HII region |
| AGAL030.368+00.484 | 20 | 0.08 | 7.11 | 135083.64 | 0.2006 | 0.7341 | 0.0400 | 0.0010 | 0.08 | 16.05 | 58.73 | HII region |
| AGAL030.623+00.547 | 212 | 0.31 | 4.88 | 24600.87 | 0.0346 | 0.2437 | 0.0143 | 0.0024 | 0.20 | 2.88 | 20.31 | Protostellar |
| AGAL030.769-00.804 | 384 | 0.51 | 4.96 | 10003.67 | 0.0124 | 0.2389 | 0.0078 | 0.0037 | 0.31 | 1.04 | 20.02 | YSO |
| AGAL031.076+00.457 | 4429 | 1.74 | 6.28 | 2905.83 | 0.0027 | 0.0655 | 0.0031 | 0.0068 | 0.57 | 0.23 | 5.49 | YSO |
| AGAL031.901+00.344 | 340 | 0.37 | 4.59 | 23205.80 | 0.0116 | 0.1819 | 0.0047 | 0.0024 | 0.20 | 0.97 | 15.16 | Protostellar |
| AGAL033.518-00.057 | 645 | 0.58 | 4.96 | 11432.77 | 0.0095 | 0.2568 | 0.0056 | 0.0035 | 0.29 | 0.79 | 21.28 | YSO |
| AGAL035.226-00.359 | 2648 | 0.83 | 5.91 | 15992.27 | 0.0049 | 0.1668 | 0.0023 | 0.0029 | 0.24 | 0.41 | 13.80 | YSO |
| AGAL035.681-00.176 | 118 | 0.23 | 6.78 | 33515.71 | 0.0521 | 0.1414 | 0.0187 | 0.0020 | 0.17 | 4.43 | 12.02 | YSO |
| AGAL036.839-00.022 | 2413 | 1.23 | 5.79 | 4491.45 | 0.0029 | 0.1169 | 0.0027 | 0.0055 | 0.46 | 0.24 | 9.78 | YSO |
| AGAL036.899-00.409 | 533 | 0.36 | 5.25 | 39470.28 | 0.0046 | 0.0400 | 0.0014 | 0.0018 | 0.15 | 0.38 | 3.33 | Protostellar |
| AGAL037.031-00.039 | 435 | 0.12 | 5.17 | 871068.28 | 0.0090 | 0.1405 | 0.0005 | 0.0004 | 0.03 | 0.68 | 10.54 | Protostellar |
| AGAL037.599+00.426 | 501 | 0.25 | 4.96 | 110925.10 | 0.0061 | 0.0689 | 0.0011 | 0.0011 | 0.09 | 0.50 | 5.64 | YSO |
| AGAL039.048-00.880 | 250 | 0.16 | 5.46 | 210961.85 | 0.0242 | 0.1656 | 0.0035 | 0.0008 | 0.07 | 2.12 | 14.49 | YSO |
| AGAL040.907-00.249 | 47 | 0.15 | 6.90 | 47976.81 | 0.0474 | 0.0474 | 0.0139 | 0.0017 | 0.14 | 3.90 | 3.90 | YSO |
| AGAL051.691-00.946 | 696 | 0.61 | 6.41 | 10582.12 | 0.0052 | 0.0778 | 0.0032 | 0.0036 | 0.30 | 0.43 | 6.48 | YSO |
| AGAL052.341+00.324 | 530 | 0.32 | 6.45 | 55802.81 | 0.0143 | 0.1270 | 0.0038 | 0.0016 | 0.13 | 1.16 | 10.32 | YSO |
| AGAL052.511-00.967 | 712 | 0.69 | 6.49 | 7485.74 | 0.0077 | 0.0786 | 0.0056 | 0.0043 | 0.36 | 0.64 | 6.58 | YSO |
| AGAL053.739+00.012 | 68 | 0.18 | 7.19 | 40150.80 | 0.0263 | 0.1192 | 0.0081 | 0.0018 | 0.15 | 2.19 | 9.93 | Protostellar |
| AGAL056.064-00.126 | 678 | 0.52 | 6.74 | 16672.79 | 0.0084 | 0.0632 | 0.0040 | 0.0029 | 0.24 | 0.70 | 5.23 | Protostellar |
| AGAL056.127+00.216 | 495 | 0.54 | 6.74 | 10854.33 | 0.0062 | 0.0755 | 0.0038 | 0.0036 | 0.30 | 0.52 | 6.29 | HII region |
| ATLASGAL name | MIPSGAL name | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| () | () | () | ||
| AGAL005.397+00.194 | MG005.3946+00.1939 | 1.85 | 0.81 | 9.25 |
| AGAL005.617-00.082 | MG005.6181-00.0821 | 7.10 | 86 | 319.50 |
| AGAL007.166+00.131 | MG007.1654+00.1314 | 4.59 | 21 | 105.57 |
| AGAL007.333-00.567 | MG007.3349-00.5665 | 3.77 | 10 | 64.09 |
| AGAL007.636-00.192 | MG007.6351-00.1922 | 7.08 | 84 | 311.52 |
| AGAL008.206+00.191 | MG008.2032+00.1917 | 2.20 | 1.80 | 15.40 |
| AGAL008.544-00.341 | MG008.5486-00.3394 | 3.06 | 5.90 | 36.72 |
| AGAL008.706-00.414 | MG008.7038-00.4121 | 3.45 | 6.70 | 75.10 |
| AGAL008.706-00.414 | MG008.7081-00.4162 | 4.06 | 14 | ... |
| AGAL008.954-00.532 | MG008.9392-00.5303 | 4.59 | 20 | 105.60 |
| AGAL008.954-00.532 | MG008.9555-00.5352 | 4.03 | 14 | ... |
| AGAL008.954-00.532 | MG008.9565-00.5426 | 4.58 | 17 | ... |
| AGAL010.404-00.201 | MG010.4082-00.2013 | 2.46 | 3 | 22.14 |
| AGAL010.742-00.126 | MG010.7415-00.1256 | 2.18 | 1.50 | 15.26 |
| AGAL010.991-00.082 | MG010.9893-00.0893 | 1.98 | 0.95 | 11.88 |
| AGAL012.496-00.222 | MG012.4986-00.2281 | 4.34 | 17 | 93.24 |
| AGAL012.496-00.222 | MG012.4992-00.2223 | 2.32 | 2.20 | ... |
| AGAL013.259-00.409 | MG013.2639-00.4064 | 1.69 | 0.54 | 8.45 |
| AGAL014.707-00.156 | MG014.7065-00.1568 | 3.93 | 12 | 68.25 |
| AGAL014.707-00.156 | MG014.7091-00.1589 | 1.82 | 0.69 | ... |
| AGAL014.707-00.156 | MG014.7117-00.1529 | 3.81 | 11 | ... |
| AGAL014.707-00.156 | MG014.7156-00.1494 | 4.09 | 13 | ... |
| AGAL014.851-00.990 | MG014.8517-00.9887 | 2.69 | 4 | 26.90 |
| AGAL015.531-00.407 | MG015.5296-00.4067 | 4.07 | 13 | 77.33 |
| AGAL016.318-00.531 | MG016.3185-00.5311 | 8.28 | 140 | 463.68 |
| AGAL016.418-00.634 | MG016.4126-00.6284 | 1.74 | 0.48 | 8.70 |
| AGAL016.442-00.384 | MG016.4462-00.3872 | 3.63 | 9.20 | 58.08 |
| AGAL016.459-00.669 | MG016.4564-00.6707 | 4.05 | 13 | 76.95 |
| AGAL016.986-00.922 | MG016.9822-00.9259 | 4.65 | 17 | 279.62 |
| AGAL016.986-00.922 | MG016.9832-00.9308 | 4.53 | 16 | ... |
| AGAL016.986-00.922 | MG016.9870-00.9207 | 5.37 | 26 | ... |
| AGAL016.986-00.922 | MG016.9883-00.9175 | 3.52 | 7.90 | ... |
| AGAL016.986-00.922 | MG016.9921-00.9110 | 9.19 | 240 | ... |
| AGAL018.231+00.652 | MG018.2283+00.6484 | 6.15 | 43 | 221.40 |
| AGAL018.286-00.707 | MG018.2860-00.7114 | 4.05 | 12 | 76.95 |
| AGAL018.549+00.036 | MG018.5509+00.0354 | 7.34 | 98 | 344.98 |
| AGAL018.606-00.074 | MG018.5945-00.0739 | 2.95 | 5.70 | 35.40 |
| AGAL018.789-00.286 | MG018.7942-00.2891 | 7.03 | 75 | 309.32 |
| AGAL019.539-00.456 | MG019.5339-00.4561 | 3.88 | 10 | 69.84 |
| AGAL019.977-00.214 | MG019.9799-00.2127 | 5.39 | 36 | 161.70 |
| AGAL021.563-00.132 | MG021.5583-00.1282 | 7.07 | 79 | 311.08 |
| AGAL022.376+00.447 | MG022.3763+00.4462 | 1.62 | 0.43 | 6.48 |
| AGAL022.434-00.169 | MG022.4352-00.1692 | 10.38 | 540 | 799.26 |
| AGAL022.484-00.936 | MG022.4851-00.9343 | 2.77 | 4.90 | 27.70 |
| AGAL022.559+00.171 | MG022.5599+00.1697 | 2.38 | 2.50 | 19.04 |
| AGAL022.699+00.404 | MG022.7053+00.4046 | 3.48 | 7.60 | 52.20 |
| () | () | () | ||
| AGAL022.832-00.437 | MG022.8347-00.4381 | 5.42 | 32 | 162.60 |
| AGAL027.016+00.202 | MG027.0163+00.2003 | 6.10 | 47 | 219.60 |
| AGAL028.608-00.027 | MG028.6088-00.0264 | 10.38 | 540 | 799.26 |
| AGAL028.841+00.494 | MG028.8423+00.4937 | 6.01 | 45 | 210.35 |
| AGAL028.881-00.021 | MG028.8800-00.0196 | 8.13 | 110 | 439.02 |
| AGAL030.368+00.484 | MG030.3571+00.4871 | 1.49 | 0.36 | 55.22 |
| AGAL030.368+00.484 | MG030.3703+00.4826 | 3.53 | 8.40 | ... |
| AGAL030.623+00.547 | MG030.6239+00.5456 | 3.92 | 11 | 68.31 |
| AGAL030.623+00.547 | MG030.6263+00.5450 | 3.67 | 9.40 | ... |
| AGAL030.769-00.804 | MG030.7698-00.8043 | 4.82 | 24 | 120.50 |
| AGAL031.076+00.457 | MG031.0739+00.4599 | 4.87 | 24 | 310.18 |
| AGAL031.076+00.457 | MG031.0764+00.4579 | 7.06 | 82 | ... |
| AGAL031.901+00.344 | MG031.9003+00.3411 | 3.98 | 12 | 75.62 |
| AGAL033.518-00.057 | MG033.5184-00.0568 | 6.19 | 54 | 222.84 |
| AGAL035.226-00.359 | MG035.2252-00.3596 | 8.80 | 160 | 530.13 |
| AGAL035.226-00.359 | MG035.2261-00.3543 | 4.13 | 14 | ... |
| AGAL035.681-00.176 | MG035.6717-00.1764 | 1.91 | 0.85 | 19.44 |
| AGAL035.681-00.176 | MG035.6771-00.1745 | 2.09 | 1.40 | ... |
| AGAL035.681-00.176 | MG035.6812-00.1756 | 2.48 | 3.10 | ... |
| AGAL036.839-00.022 | MG036.8393-00.0223 | 7.10 | 94 | 319.50 |
| AGAL036.899-00.409 | MG036.8983-00.4093 | 2.47 | 2.80 | 22.23 |
| AGAL037.031-00.039 | MG037.0301-00.0385 | 3.95 | 12 | 71.10 |
| AGAL037.599+00.426 | MG037.6036+00.4292 | 3.09 | 6.20 | 37.08 |
| AGAL039.048-00.880 | MG039.0466-00.8846 | 3.48 | 7.70 | 49.60 |
| AGAL039.048-00.880 | MG039.0479-00.8806 | 2.72 | 4.30 | ... |
| AGAL040.907-00.249 | MG040.9059-00.2487 | 1.15 | 0.17 | 2.34 |
| AGAL040.907-00.249 | MG040.9108-00.2478 | 1.19 | 0.19 | ... |
| AGAL051.691-00.946 | MG051.6852-00.9479 | 3.67 | 9.90 | 58.72 |
| AGAL052.341+00.324 | MG052.3410+00.3234 | 3.62 | 9.40 | 77.10 |
| AGAL052.341+00.324 | MG052.3410+00.3258 | 4.09 | 14 | ... |
| AGAL052.511-00.967 | MG052.5077-00.9584 | 1.83 | 0.76 | 60.72 |
| AGAL052.511-00.967 | MG052.5133-00.9579 | 3.69 | 9.80 | ... |
| AGAL053.739+00.012 | MG053.7421+00.0102 | 1.84 | 0.81 | 9.20 |
| AGAL056.064-00.126 | MG056.0651-00.1273 | 2.44 | 2.90 | 45.76 |
| AGAL056.064-00.126 | MG056.0729-00.1271 | 3.28 | 7.20 | ... |
| AGAL056.127+00.216 | MG056.1272+00.2147 | 3.11 | 6.40 | 40.43 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.