Submitted:
09 June 2026
Posted:
11 June 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Experimental Framework
2.2. Sample Preparation and Handling
2.3. Preparation of Botanical Extracts

2.4.Treatment Application and Storage Conditions
2.5. Data Collection and Analytical Measurements
2.5.1.Microbial Load Determination
2.5.2. Determination of Physiological Loss in Weight (PLW)
2.5.3. Determination of Titratable Acidity (TA)
2.5.4. pH Measurement
2.5.5. Determination of Total Soluble Solids (TSS)
2.5.6. Determination of Moisture Content
2.5.7. Determination of Spoilage of Tomato
Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Microbial Load
3.2. Physiological Loss in Weight (PLW) or simply Weight Loss During Storage
3.3. Spoilage Incidence
3.4. Total Soluble Solids (°Brix)
3.5. Titratable Acidity
3.6. Marketability Assessment
3.3. Overall Quality Index
4. Discussion
4.1 Microbial Load
4.2 Physiological Weight Loss During Storage
4.3. Spoilage Incidence
4.4.Total Soluble Solids (°Brix)
4.5. Titratable Acidity
4.6 Marketability Assessment
4.7 Overall Quality Index
4.8 Overall Implications of the Study
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| CRD | Completely Randomized Design |
| PLW | Physiological Loss in Weight |
| OQI | Overall Quality Index |
| TSS | Total soluble solids |
| LSD | Least Significant Difference |
| TA | Titratable acidity |
| AOAC | Association of official Analytical Chemists |
References
- Astija, A.; Febriani, V.I.; Alibasyah, L.; Isnainar, I. Climate and Cultivar of Tomato ( Licopersicum Esculentum L.) Affect the Lycopene Contents. Arch. Pharm. Pract. 2023, 14, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Câmara, J.S.; Albuquerque, B.R.; Aguiar, J.; Corrêa, R.C.G.; Gonçalves, J.L.; Granato, D.; Pereira, J.A.M.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Food Bioactive Compounds and Emerging Techniques for Their Extraction: Polyphenols as a Case Study. Foods 2021, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Collins, E.J.; Bowyer, C.; Tsouza, A.; Chopra, M. Tomatoes: An Extensive Review of the Associated Health Impacts of Tomatoes and Factors That Can Affect Their Cultivation. Biology . 2022, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mao, Q.Q.; Xu, X.Y.; Cao, S.Y.; Gan, R.Y.; Corke, H.; Beta, T.; Li, H. Bin Bioactive Compounds and Bioactivities of Ginger (Zingiber Officinale Roscoe). Foods 2019, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teodoro, A.J. Bioactive Compounds of Food: Their Role in the Prevention and Treatment of Diseases. In Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev.; 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Oladipo, E.K.; Oladipo, B.; Ojumu, T.V.; Caleb, O.J. Postharvest Losses of Tomato: Causes, Spoilage Mechanisms, and Advances in Conventional and Emerging Technologies for Preservation. Food Res. Int. 2026, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Espinosa-Antón, A.A.; Hernández-Herrera, R.M.; Velasco-Ramírez, S.F.; Ramírez-Anguiano, A.C.; Salcedo-Pérez, E. Productivity and Quality Characteristics of Tomato Fruits (Solanum Lycopersicum) Are Improved by the Application of a Green Seaweed (Ulva Ohnoi). Agriculture 2025, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kader, A.A. Postharvest Technology of Horticultural Crops-An Overview from Farm to Fork; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Kafaoğlu, B.; Fisher, A.; Hill, S.; Kara, D.; Kafaoğlu, B.; Fisher, A.; Hill, S.; Chemometric, D.K. Food Additives & Contaminants : Part A Chemometric Evaluation of Trace Metal Concentrations in Some Nuts and Seeds. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2014, 31, 1529–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shannon, R.; Rodriguez, J.M. Food Additives & Contaminants : Part B Total Arsenic in Rice Milk. Food Addit. Contam. Part B 2014, 7, 54–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agyare, C.; Dwobeng, A.S.; Agyepong, N.; Boakye, Y.D.; Mensah, K.B.; Patrick George Ayande, A.; Adarkwa-Yiadom, M. Antimicrobial, Antioxidant, and Wound Healing Properties of Kigelia Africana. Adv. Pharmacol. Sci. 2013, 2013, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shaukat, M.N.; Nazir, A.; Fallico, B. Ginger Bioactives: A Comprehensive Review of Health Benefits and Potential Food Applications. Antioxidants 2023, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tajkarimi, M.M.; Ibrahim, S.A.; Cliver, D.O. Antimicrobial Herb and Spice Compounds in Food. Food Control 2010, 21, 1199–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bazaraliyeva, A.; Moldashov, D.; Turgumbayeva, A.; Kartbayeva, E.; Kalykova, A.; Sarsenova, L.; Issayeva, R. Chemical and Biological Properties of Bio-Active Compounds from Garlic. Allium Sativum. [CrossRef]
- El-Saadony, M.T.; Saad, A.M.; Korma, S.A.; Salem, H.M.; Abd El-Mageed, T.A.; Alkafaas, S.S.; Elsalahaty, M.I.; Elkafas, S.S.; Mosa, W.F.A.; Ahmed, A.E.; et al. Garlic Bioactive Substances and Their Therapeutic Applications for Improving Human Health: A Comprehensive Review. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shang, A.; Cao, S.Y.; Xu, X.Y.; Gan, R.Y.; Tang, G.Y.; Corke, H.; Mavumengwana, V.; Li, H. Bin Bioactive Compounds and Biological Functions of Garlic (Allium Sativum L.). Foods 2019, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ambler, K.; De Brauw, A. Measuring Postharvest Losses at the Farm Level in Malawi; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Nakamoto, M.; Kunimura, K.; Suzuki, J.; Kodera, Y. Antimicrobial Properties of Hydrophobic Compounds in Garlic: Allicin, Vinyldithiin, Ajoene and Diallyl Polysulfides (Review). Exp. Ther. Med. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- GOMEZ Head, K.A.; GOMEZ Professor of Agronomy, A.A.; Wiley, J. York Chichester Brisbane Toronto Singapore, N. 6 (IZ-? STATISTICAL PROCEDURES FOR AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Second Edition A. In Wiley-Intersclence Publication; 1984. [Google Scholar]
- Montgomery, D.C. Design and Analysis of Experiments, 9th Edition; Wiley, 2017; ISBN 9781119113478. [Google Scholar]
- Thompson, A. Fruits and Vegetables: Handling and Storage. In Fruits and Vegetables> Handling and storage; Thompson, A.K., Ed.; blackwell publishing Ltd, 2003; pp. 1115–1369. [Google Scholar]
- Thompson, A. Post.-Harvest Handl. Protoc. Fruits Veg. 1996.
- Baldwin, E.A.; Nisperos-Carriedo, M.O.; Baker, R.A. Edible Coatings for Lightly Processed Fruits and Vegetables; 1995; Vol. 30. [Google Scholar]
- Tiamiyu, Q.O.; Adebayo, S.E.; Yusuf, A.A. Gum Arabic Edible Coating and Its Application in Preservation of Fresh Fruits and Vegetables: A Review. Food Chem. Adv. 2023, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sajan, N.M.; Gowda, A.B. Post-Harvest Losses and Challenges Faced by Farmers-Focus on Sustainable Production and Minimisation of Wastage; ISBN 978-93-83302-82-6.
- Wills, R.B.H.; McGlasson, W.B.; Graham, D.; Joyce, D.C.; Hall, E.G. Postharvest: An Introduction to the Physiology and Handling of Fruit and Vegetables (6th Ed.), 6th edition.; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2016; ISBN 0292704836. [Google Scholar]
- AOAC, A. of official A.C. Stakehold. Panel Strateg. Food Anal. Methods (SPSFAM) 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Kader, Adel A. Postharvest Technology of Horticulture Crops, 3rd ed.; Kader, Adel A., Ed.; University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources: Oakland, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Kader, A.A. Postharvest Technology of Horticultural Crops-An Overview from Farm to Fork; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Bachmann, J.; Earles, R. Postharvest Handling of Fruits and Vegetables; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Siddiqui, M.Wasim. Postharvest Biology and Technology of Horticultural Crops : Principles and Practices for Quality Maintenance. In AAP; Apple Academic Press, 2015; ISBN 9781771880862. [Google Scholar]
- Ferdousi, J.; Hossain, M.I.; Saha, S.R.; Rob, M.; Afroz, T.; Pramanik, S.; Islam, M.R.; Nath, D.D. POSTHARVEST PHYSIOLOGY OF FRUITS AND VEGETABLES AND THEIR MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY: A REVIEW. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2024, 34, 291–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, A.; Maqbool, M.; Ramachandran, S.; Alderson, P.G. Gum Arabic as a Novel Edible Coating for Enhancing Shelf-Life and Improving Postharvest Quality of Tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum L.) Fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2010, 58, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhall, R.K. Advances in Edible Coatings for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables: A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 53, 435–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valero, Daniel.; Serrano, M. Postharvest Biology and Technology for Preserving Fruit Quality; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 2010; ISBN 9781439802663. [Google Scholar]





![]() |
| Treatment | Marketability (%) | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 46.2 | Highest retention of acceptable quality |
| Garlic | 38.5 | Improved preservation due to moisture and microbial control |
| Ginger | 20.0 | Lowest marketability; associated with higher deterioration |
| Treatment | OQI Score | Quality Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 27.8 | Poor overall quality; high deterioration |
| Ginger | 41.4 | Moderate quality; partial preservation |
| Garlic | 78.4 | High quality; effective preservation |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
