Submitted:
08 June 2026
Posted:
09 June 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
2.2. Serum Preparation
2.3. Targeted HPLC-MS Analysis
2.4. Non-Targeted DIA-PASEF-MS Analysis
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Clinical Characteristics
3.2. Non-Targeted DIA-MS Proteome Profile
3.3. Targeted MRM-MS Validation
3.4. Associations Between Protein Markers and Clinical Parameters
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| AUC | Area under receive operational curve |
| BMI | Body mass index |
| MAP | Mean arterial pressure |
| SBP | Systolic blood pressure |
| DBP | Diastolic blood pressure |
| DIA | Data-independent acquisition |
| FDR | False discovery rate |
| HPLC | High-performance liquid |
| LLOQ | Lowest limit of quantification |
| MoM | Multiply of medians |
| MRM | Multiply reaction monitoring |
| MS | Mass spectrometry |
| NAT | Natural synthetic proteotypic peptides |
| OPLS-DA | Orthogonal projection on latent structures discriminant analysis |
| QC | Quality control |
| PASEF | Parallel accumulation-serial fragmentation |
| PCA | Principal component analysis |
| PE | Preeclampsia |
| CS | Caesarian section |
| CPR | cerebroplacental ratio |
| UtA-PI | Uterine artery pulsatility index |
| UA-PI | Umbilical artery pulsatility index |
| PlGF | Placental growth factor |
| ROC | Receive operational curve |
| SIS | Stable isotope labeled standard |
| SVM | Support vector machine |
| VIP | Variable important projection |
References
- Magee, L.A.; Brown, M.A.; Hall, D.R.; Gupte, S.; Hennessy, A.; Karumanchi, S.A.; Kenny, L.C.; McCarthy, F.; Myers, J.; Poon, L.C.; et al. The 2021 International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy Classification, Diagnosis & Management Recommendations for International Practice. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2022, 27, 148–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wright, D.; Syngelaki, A.; Akolekar, R.; Poon, L.C.; Nicolaides, K.H. Competing Risks Model in Screening for Preeclampsia by Maternal Characteristics and Medical History. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 213, 62.e1–62.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- O’Gorman, N.; Wright, D.; Poon, L.C.; Rolnik, D.L.; Syngelaki, A.; de Alvarado, M.; Carbone, I.F.; Dutemeyer, V.; Fiolna, M.; Frick, A.; et al. Multicenter Screening for Pre-Eclampsia by Maternal Factors and Biomarkers at 11–13 Weeks’ Gestation: Comparison with NICE Guidelines and ACOG Recommendations. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 49, 756–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rezende, K.B. de C.; Bornia, R.G.; Rolnik, D.L.; Amim, J.; Ladeira, L.P.; Teixeira, V.M.G.; da Cunha, A.J.L.A. Performance of the First-Trimester Fetal Medicine Foundation Competing Risks Model for Preeclampsia Prediction: An External Validation Study in Brazil. AJOG Glob. Rep. 2024, 4, 100346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, Y.; Xie, Y.; Li, M.; Mu, Y.; Chen, P.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Li, Q.; Li, X.; Dai, L.; et al. Characteristics and Fetal Outcomes of Pregnant Women with Hypertensive Disorders in China: A 9-Year National Hospital-Based Cohort Study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022, 22, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leonard, S.A.; Siadat, S.; Main, E.K.; Huybrechts, K.F.; El-Sayed, Y.Y.; Hlatky, M.A.; Atkinson, J.; Sujan, A.; Bateman, B.T. Chronic Hypertension during Pregnancy: Prevalence and Treatment in the United States, 2008-2021. Hypertension 2024, 81, 1716–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pembe, A.B.; Dwarkanath, P.; Kikula, A.; Raj, J.M.; Perumal, N.; Paulo, H.A.; Rajalakshmi, M.; Duggan, C.P.; Masanja, H.M.; Chopra, N.; et al. Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes: Two Prospective Cohort Studies of Nulliparous Women in India and Tanzania. BMJ Glob. Heal. 2025, 10, e016339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antwi, E.; Amoakoh-Coleman, M.; Vieira, D.L.; Madhavaram, S.; Koram, K.A.; Grobbee, D.E.; Agyepong, I.A.; Klipstein-Grobusch, K. Systematic Review of Prediction Models for Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0230955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akolekar, R.; Syngelaki, A.; Poon, L.; Wright, D.; Nicolaides, K.H. Competing Risks Model in Early Screening for Preeclampsia by Biophysical and Biochemical Markers. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2013, 33, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rolnik, D.L.; Wright, D.; Poon, L.C.Y.; Syngelaki, A.; O’Gorman, N.; de Paco Matallana, C.; Akolekar, R.; Cicero, S.; Janga, D.; Singh, M.; et al. ASPRE Trial: Performance of Screening for Preterm Pre-Eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. Off. J. Int. Soc. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 50, 492–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corrigendum. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. Off. J. Int. Soc. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 50, 807. [CrossRef]
- Guerby, P.; Audibert, F.; Johnson, J.-A.; Okun, N.; Giguère, Y.; Forest, J.-C.; Chaillet, N.; Mâsse, B.; Wright, D.; Ghesquiere, L.; et al. Prospective Validation of First-Trimester Screening for Preterm Preeclampsia in Nulliparous Women (PREDICTION Study). Hypertension 2024, 81, 1574–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Riishede, I.; Rode, L.; Sperling, L.; Overgaard, M.; Ravn, J.D.; Sandager, P.; Skov, H.; Wagner, S.R.; Nørgaard, P.; Clausen, T.D.; et al. Pre-Eclampsia Screening in Denmark (PRESIDE): National Validation Study. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2023, 61, 682–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Poon, L.C.Y.; Zymeri, N.A.; Zamprakou, A.; Syngelaki, A.; Nicolaides, K.H. Protocol for Measurement of Mean Arterial Pressure at 11-13 Weeks’ Gestation. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2012, 31, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plasencia, W.; Maiz, N.; Bonino, S.; Kaihura, C.; Nicolaides, K.H. Uterine Artery Doppler at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 Weeks in the Prediction of Preeclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2007, 30, 742–749. [Google Scholar]
- Starodubtseva, N.; Poluektova, A.; Tokareva, A.; Kukaev, E.; Avdeeva, A.; Rimskaya, E.; Khodzayeva, Z. Proteome-Based Maternal Plasma and Serum Biomarkers for Preeclampsia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Life 2025, 15, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Than, N.G.; Posta, M.; Györffy, D.; Orosz, L.; Orosz, G.; Rossi, S.W.; Ambrus-Aikelin, G.; Szilágyi, A.; Nagy, S.; Hupuczi, P.; et al. Early Pathways, Biomarkers, and Four Distinct Molecular Subclasses of Preeclampsia: The Intersection of Clinical, Pathological, and High-Dimensional Biology Studies. Placenta 2022, 125, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anderson, N.L. The Clinical Plasma Proteome: A Survey of Clinical Assays for Proteins in Plasma and Serum. Clin. Chem. 2010, 56, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demichev, V.; Szyrwiel, L.; Yu, F.; Teo, G.C.; Rosenberger, G.; Niewienda, A.; Ludwig, D.; Decker, J.; Kaspar-Schoenefeld, S.; Lilley, K.S.; et al. Dia-PASEF Data Analysis Using FragPipe and DIA-NN for Deep Proteomics of Low Sample Amounts. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lange, V.; Picotti, P.; Domon, B.; Aebersold, R. Selected Reaction Monitoring for Quantitative Proteomics: A Tutorial. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2008, 4, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaither, C.; Popp, R.; Mohammed, Y.; Borchers, C.H. Determination of the Concentration Range for 267 Proteins from 21 Lots of Commercial Human Plasma Using Highly Multiplexed Multiple Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry. Analyst 2020, 145, 3634–3644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaither, C.; Popp, R.; Borchers, S.P.; Skarphedinsson, K.; Eiriksson, F.F.; Thorsteinsdóttir, M.; Mohammed, Y.; Borchers, C.H. Performance Assessment of a 125 Human Plasma Peptide Mixture Stored at Room Temperature for Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Mass Spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 2021, 20, 4292–4302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Starodubtseva, N.; Tokareva, A.; Kononikhin, A.; Brzhozovskiy, A.; Bugrova, A.; Kukaev, E.; Poluektova, A.; Frankevich, V.; Nikolaev, E.; Sukhikh, G. Multiplexed Quantification of First-Trimester Serum Biomarkers in Healthy Pregnancy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 7970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Starodubtseva, N.; Tokareva, A.; Kononikhin, A.; Brzhozovskiy, A.; Bugrova, A.; Kukaev, E.; Muminova, K.; Nakhabina, A.; Frankevich, V.E.; Nikolaev, E.; et al. First-Trimester Preeclampsia-Induced Disturbance in Maternal Blood Serum Proteome: A Pilot Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 10653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Camacho-Carrasco, A.; Montenegro-Martínez, J.; Miranda-Guisado, M.L.; Muñoz-Hernández, R.; Salsoso, R.; Fatela-Cantillo, D.; García-Díaz, L.; Stiefel García-Junco, P.; Mate, A.; Vázquez, C.M.; et al. Association of First-Trimester Maternal Biomarkers with Preeclampsia and Related Maternal and Fetal Severe Adverse Events. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 6684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, P.; Van Den Berg, C.; Alfirevic, Z.; O’brien, S.; Röthlisberger, M.; Baker, P.N.; Kenny, L.C.; Kublickiene, K.; Duvekot, J.J. Early Pregnancy Biomarkers in Pre-Eclampsia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 23035–23056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kononikhin, A.S.; Starodubtseva, N.L.; Brzhozovskiy, A.G.; Tokareva, A.O.; Kashirina, D.N.; Zakharova, N.V.; Bugrova, A.E.; Indeykina, M.I.; Pastushkova, L.K.; Larina, I.M.; et al. Absolute Quantitative Targeted Monitoring of Potential Plasma Protein Biomarkers: A Pilot Study on Healthy Individuals. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 2403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MacLean, B.X.; Pratt, B.S.; Egertson, J.D.; MacCoss, M.J.; Smith, R.D.; Baker, E.S. Using Skyline to Analyze Data-Containing Liquid Chromatography, Ion Mobility Spectrometry, and Mass Spectrometry Dimensions. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2018, 29, 2182–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Medicines Agency ICH Guideline M10 on Bioanalytical Method Validation and Study Sample Analysis; 2022; Vol. 44. Vol. 44.
- Gerault, M.-A.; Camoin, L.; Granjeaud, S. DIAgui: A Shiny Application to Process the Output from DIA-NN. Bioinforma. Adv. 2024, 00, vbae001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tyanova, S.; Temu, T.; Sinitcyn, P.; Carlson, A.; Hein, M.Y.; Geiger, T.; Mann, M.; Cox, J. The Perseus Computational Platform for Comprehensive Analysis of (Prote)Omics Data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 731–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, M.; Jiang, L.; Jian, R.; Chan, J.Y.; Liu, Q.; Snyder, M.P.; Tang, H. RobNorm: Model-Based Robust Normalization Method for Labeled Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Data. Bioinformatics 2021, 37, 815–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galindo-Prieto, B.; Eriksson, L.; Trygg, J. Variable Influence on Projection (VIP) for Orthogonal Projections to Latent Structures (OPLS). J. Chemom. 2014, 28, 623–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burges, C.J.C. A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 1998, 2, 121–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kam Ho, T. Random Decision Forests, 2002.
- Clerc, M.; Kennedy, J. The Particle Swarm—Explosion, Stability, and Convergence in a Multidimensional Complex Space. Mutat. Res. DNAging 2002, 6, 58–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szklarczyk, D.; Kirsch, R.; Koutrouli, M.; Nastou, K.; Mehryary, F.; Hachilif, R.; Gable, A.L.; Fang, T.; Doncheva, N.T.; Pyysalo, S.; et al. The STRING Database in 2023: Protein-Protein Association Networks and Functional Enrichment Analyses for Any Sequenced Genome of Interest. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D638–D646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- CoreTeam, R. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing Available online: https://www.r-project.org.
- R team R Studio: Integrated Development for R.; RStudio, Inc.: Boston, MA, 2016.
- Thévenot, E.A.; Roux, A.; Xu, Y.; Ezan, E.; Junot, C. Analysis of the Human Adult Urinary Metabolome Variations with Age, Body Mass Index, and Gender by Implementing a Comprehensive Workflow for Univariate and OPLS Statistical Analyses. J. Proteome Res. 2015, 14, 3322–3335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Torchiano, M. Effsize: Efficient Effect Size Computation Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/package=effsize.
- Champely, S. Pwr: Basic Functions for Power Analysis Available online: https://github.com/heliosdrm/pwr.
- Meyer, D. Support Vector Machines. The Interface to Libsvm in Package E1071 2024, 8.
- Kuhn, M. Building Predictive Models in R Using the Caret Package. J. Stat. Softw. 2008, 28, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
- Wickham, H.; François, R.; Henry, L.; Müller, K.; Vaughan, D. Dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation 2025.
- Wickham, H. Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis: Ggplot2; 2008; ISBN 978-0-387-78170-9.
- Cai, C.; Zhang, Z.; Morales, M.; Wang, Y.; Khafipour, E.; Friel, J. Feeding Practice Influences Gut Microbiome Composition in Very Low Birth Weight Preterm Infants and the Association with Oxidative Stress: A Prospective Cohort Study. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2019, 142, 146–154. [Google Scholar]
- Wickham, H. Forcats: Tools for Working with Categorical Variables (Factors) 2023.
- Slowikowski, K. Ggrepel: Automatically Position Non-Overlapping Text Labels with “Ggplot2” Available online: https://github.com/slowkow/ggrepel.
- Kolde, R. Pheatmap: Pretty Heatmaps Available online: https://github.com/raivokolde/pheatmap.
- Turck, N.; Vutskits, L.; Sanchez-Pena, P.; Robin, X.; Hainard, A.; Gex-Fabry, M.; Fouda, C.; Bassem, H.; Mueller, M.; Lisacek, F.; et al. PROC: An Open-Source Package for R and S+ to Analyze and Compare ROC Curves. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 8, 12–77. [Google Scholar]
- O’Gorman, N.; Wright, D.; Syngelaki, A.; Akolekar, R.; Wright, A.; Poon, L.C.; Nicolaides, K.H. Competing Risks Model in Screening for Preeclampsia by Maternal Factors and Biomarkers at 11-13 Weeks Gestation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 214, 103.e1–103.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rolnik, D.L.; Wright, D.; Poon, L.C.; O’Gorman, N.; Syngelaki, A.; de Paco Matallana, C.; Akolekar, R.; Cicero, S.; Janga, D.; Singh, M.; et al. Aspirin versus Placebo in Pregnancies at High Risk for Preterm Preeclampsia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 613–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Duley, L.; Meher, S.; Hunter, K.E.; Seidler, A.L.; Askie, L.M. Antiplatelet Agents for Preventing Pre-Eclampsia and Its Complications. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019, 2019, CD004659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Starodubtseva, N.; Tokareva, A.; Kononikhin, A.; Bugrova, A.; Indeykina, M.; Kukaev, E.; Poluektova, A.; Brzhozovskiy, A.; Nikolaev, E.; Sukhikh, G. Machine Learning and Blood-Targeted Proteomics Enable Early Prediction and Etiological Discrimination of Hypertensive Pregnancy Disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Starodubtseva, N.; Tokareva, A.; Frankevich, N.; Kononikhin, A.; Bugrova, A.; Indeykina, M.; Kukaev, E.; Derenko, A.; Frankevich, V.; Nikolaev, E.; et al. Integrated Clinical and Molecular Profiling of Fetal Growth Disorders in the First Trimester. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 4192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Than, N.G.; Romero, R.; Györffy, D.; Posta, M.; Bhatti, G.; Done, B.; Chaemsaithong, P.; Jung, E.; Suksai, M.; Gotsch, F.; et al. Molecular Subclasses of Preeclampsia Characterized by a Longitudinal Maternal Proteomics Study: Distinct Biomarkers, Disease Pathways and Options for Prevention. J. Perinat. Med. 2023, 51, 51–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Than, N.G.; Romero, R.; Posta, M.; Györffy, D.; Szalai, G.; Rossi, S.W.; Szilágyi, A.; Hupuczi, P.; Nagy, S.; Török, O.; et al. Classification of Preeclampsia According to Molecular Clusters with the Goal of Achieving Personalized Prevention. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2024, 161, 104172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Y. dong; Xu, B. ning; Wang, M. lu; Wang, Y. qin; Yu, F.; Chen, Q.; Zhao, M. hui Dysregulation of Complement System during Pregnancy in Patients with Preeclampsia: A Prospective Study. Mol. Immunol. 2020, 122, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsuyama, T.; Tomimatsu, T.; Mimura, K.; Yagi, K.; Kawanishi, Y.; Kakigano, A.; Nakamura, H.; Endo, M.; Kimura, T. Complement Activation by an Angiogenic Imbalance Leads to Systemic Vascular Endothelial Dysfunction: A New Proposal for the Pathophysiology of Preeclampsia. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2021, 145, 103322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Starodubtseva, N.; Nizyaeva, N.; Baev, O.; Bugrova, A.; Gapaeva, M.; Muminova, K.; Kononikhin, A.; Frankevich, V.; Nikolaev, E.; Sukhikh, G. SERPINA1 Peptides in Urine as a Potential Marker of Preeclampsia Severity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Aneman, I.; Nikolic, V.; Karadzov Orlic, N.; Mikovic, Z.; Stefanovic, M.; Cakic, Z.; Jovanovic, H.; Town, S.E.L.; Padula, M.P.; et al. Maternal Plasma Proteome Profiling of Biomarkers and Pathogenic Mechanisms of Early-Onset and Late-Onset Preeclampsia. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 19099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yoshida, K.; Kusama, K.; Tamura, K.; Fukushima, Y.; Ohmaru-Nakanishi, T.; Kato, K. Alpha-1 Antitrypsin-Induced Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Promotes Invasion by Extravillous Trophoblasts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rood, K.M.; Buhimschi, C.S.; Dible, T.; Webster, S.; Zhao, G.; Samuels, P.; Buhimschi, I.A. Congo Red Dot Paper Test for Antenatal Triage and Rapid Identification of Preeclampsia. EClinicalMedicine 2019, 8, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buhimschi, I.A.; Nayeri, U.A.; Zhao, G.; Shook, L.L.; Pensalfini, A.; Funai, E.F.; Bernstein, I.M.; Glabe, C.G.; Buhimschi, C.S. Protein Misfolding, Congophilia, Oligomerization, and Defective Amyloid Processing in Preeclampsia. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014, 6, 245ra92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, H.H.; Baldauf, C.; Pickering, T.A.; Gjessing, H.K.; Ingles, S.A.; Wilson, M.L. Maternal and Fetal SERPINA3 Polymorphisms and Risk of Preeclampsia: A Dyad and Triad Based Case-Control Study. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Gao, S.; Luan, Y.; Su, S.; Zhang, E.; Liu, J.; Xie, S.; Zhang, Y.; Yue, W.; Liu, R.; et al. Predictivity of Hepatic Steatosis Index for Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia: A Prospective Cohort Study. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2025, 22, 834–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elhoseeny, M.M.; Abdulaziz, B.A.; Mohamed, M.A.; Elsharaby, R.M.; Rashad, G.M.; Othman, A.A.A. Fetuin-A: A Relevant Novel Serum Biomarker for Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD): A Retrospective Case-Control Study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2024, 24, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkar, M.; Grab, J.; Dodge, J.L.; Gunderson, E.P.; Rubin, J.; Irani, R.A.; Cedars, M.; Terrault, N. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Pregnancy Is Associated with Adverse Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes. J. Hepatol. 2020, 73, 516–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Jamaly, H.; Eslick, G.D.; Weltman, M. Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis: Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and the Association with Pregnancy Outcomes. Clin. Mol. Hepatol. 2022, 28, 52–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaemsaithong, P.; Romero, R.; Tarca, A.L.; Korzeniewski, S.J.; Schwartz, A.G.; Miranda, J.; Ahmed, A.I.; Dong, Z.; Hassan, S.S.; Yeo, L.; et al. Maternal Plasma Fetuin-A Concentration Is Lower in Patients Who Subsequently Developed Preterm Preeclampsia than in Uncomplicated Pregnancy: A Longitudinal Study. J. Matern. Neonatal Med. 2015, 28, 1260–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolialexi, A.; Tsangaris, G.T.; Sifakis, S.; Gourgiotis, D.; Katsafadou, A.; Lykoudi, A.; Marmarinos, A.; Mavreli, D.; Pergialiotis, V.; Fexi, D.; et al. Plasma Biomarkers for the Identification of Women at Risk for Early-Onset Preeclampsia. Expert Rev. Proteom. 2017, 14, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tiensuu, H.; Haapalainen, A.M.; Tissarinen, P.; Pasanen, A.; Määttä, T.A.; Huusko, J.M.; Ohlmeier, S.; Bergmann, U.; Ojaniemi, M.; Muglia, L.J.; et al. Human Placental Proteomics and Exon Variant Studies Link AAT/SERPINA1 with Spontaneous Preterm Birth. BMC Med. 2022, 20, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jin, P.P.; Ding, N.; Dai, J.; Liu, X.Y.; Mao, P.M. Investigation of the Relationship between Changes in Maternal Coagulation Profile in the First Trimester and the Risk of Developing Preeclampsia. Heliyon 2023, 9, e17983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parameshwar, P.K.; Sagrillo-Fagundes, L.; Fournier, C.; Girard, S.; Vaillancourt, C.; Moraes, C. Disease-Specific Extracellular Matrix Composition Regulates Placental Trophoblast Fusion Efficiency. Biomater. Sci. 2021, 9, 7247–7256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]




| Feature | Control (n=32) | PE (n=32) | p-Value |
| Age, years, Me[Q1;Q3] | 31.6 (29.4; 34.75) | 33.35 (29.08; 37.45) | 0.08 |
| BMI, Me[Q1;Q3] | 21.49 (19.72; 22.89) | 22.74 (20.36; 24.52) | 0.07 |
| Previous PE, n (%) | 0(0%) | 7(22%) | 0.02 |
| Nulliparous, n(%) | 11(34%) | 24(72%) | <0.001 |
| IVF, n(%) | 0(0%) | 2(6%) | 0.49 |
| Habitual miscarage, n(%) | 0(0%) | 12(38%) | <0.001 |
| Previous preterm delivery, n(%) | 0(0%) | 8(25%) | 0.01 |
| Gestational age at sample collection, wks, Me[Q1;Q3] | 12.14 (11.86; 12.93) | 12.29 (12.11; 12.57) | 0.73 |
| MAP, MoM, Me[Q1;Q3] | 1 (0.95; 1.04) | 1.04 (0.97; 1.12) | 0.1 |
| PIGF (1st trimester prenatal screening), MoM, Me[Q1;Q3] | 0.74 (0.54; 1.06) | 0.55 (0.36; 0.69) | 0.002 |
| FMF first-trimester high PE risk, n(%) | 0(0%) | 17(53%) | <0.001 |
| Max. SBP, Me[Q1;Q3] | 115 (110; 120) | 135 (125; 149.75) | <0.001 |
| Max. DBP, Me[Q1;Q3] | 70 (70; 74.5) | 89 (80; 99.25) | <0.001 |
| UA-PI, Me[Q1;Q3] | 0.79 (0.73; 0.88) | 0.95 (0.82; 1.13) | 0.002 |
| CPR, Me[Q1;Q3] | 1.89 (1.58; 2.2) | 1.44 (1.31; 1.75) | <0.001 |
| 24-hour proteinuria, g/L, Me[Q1;Q3] | 0 (0; 0) | 1.1 (0.61; 2.18) | <0.001 |
| Creatinine, µM/L, Me[Q1;Q3] | 66.6 (63.3; 69.45) | 80.8 (70.85; 87.77) | <0.001 |
| Gestational age at delivery, wks, Me[Q1;Q3] | 39.4 (38.55; 40) | 37.2 (34.8; 38) | <0.001 |
| Blood loss at delivery, ml, Me[Q1;Q3] | 300 (250; 350) | 700 (475; 700) | <0.001 |
| Emergency CS, n(%) | 1(3%) | 19(59%) | <0.001 |
| Apgar score at 1 min | 8 (8; 8) | 8 (7; 8) | 0.002 |
| Apgar score at 5 min | 9 (9; 9) | 8.5 (8; 9) | 0.001 |
| Newborn weight, g, Me[Q1;Q3] | 3400 (3215; 3613) | 2745 (1691; 3097.5) | <0.001 |
| Model | Accuracy, % | Sensitivity, % | Specificity, % | AUC | PPV | NPV | F-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPLS-DA | 94% | 94% | 94% | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.94 |
| SVM, linear kernel | 95% | 94% | 97% | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.95 |
| SVM, polynomial kernel | 95% | 94% | 97% | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.95 |
| SVM., radial kernel | 73% | 75% | 72% | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.74 |
| SVM, sigmoid kernel | 89% | 88% | 91% | 0.89 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.89 |
| Random Forest | 95% | 94% | 97% | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.95 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).