Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Mechanical Characterization in Red Blood Cells Using Optical Tweezers: A Review

Submitted:

04 June 2026

Posted:

05 June 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Given that red blood cells (RBCs) are the most abundant cells in blood, their morphology and mechanics strongly affect blood rheology. Furthermore, changes in the physiological functions and health status of an organism can also affect RBC mechanics. Therefore, understanding the mechanical properties of RBCs holds substantial research value in the biomedical field. Optical tweezers (OT) technology has become a crucial method for measuring and analyzing the mechanical properties of RBCs, owing to their unique advantages such as non-contact manipulation and piconewton-level force sensitivity. This review first outlines the basic mechanical properties of RBCs, the mechanical sensing principles of optical tweezers, and their basic manipulation modes. It then focuses on the measurement and application of key mechanical parameters, such as the deformation index and shear modulus. Furthermore, the review also covers the integration of optical tweezers with Raman spectroscopy, fluorescence, and microfluidics. These combined approaches allow for the simultaneous acquisition of mechanical and molecular data, dynamic monitoring of mechanical state changes, and analysis of external stimuli and physiological mechanisms, thereby supporting disease diagnosis, drug efficacy evaluation, as well as artificial blood quality assessment.
Keywords: 
;  ;  
Subject: 
Physical Sciences  -   Biophysics

1. Introduction

Red blood cells (RBCs), the most abundant cells in human blood, circulate throughout the vascular system and interact with diverse tissues. Therefore, their physical and biochemical properties are essential indicators for biomedical analysis and clinical diagnosis, with mechanical properties serving as key parameters reflecting cellular physiological function and pathological state. For example, high deformability enables RBCs to pass smoothly through capillaries narrower than 3 μm [1].
A number of studies have shown that abnormalities in RBC mechanical properties are closely associated with various diseases. For example, malaria infection leads to a significant increase in RBC membrane’s stiffness [2,3,4]; sickle cell anemia causes a substantial reduction in RBC deformability [5]; and RBC stiffness increases in diabetic patients [6]. This indicates that pathological conditions can significantly alter RBC mechanical properties, including deformability, shape recovery ability, elasticity, stiffness, and aggregability. Conversely, changes in these mechanical properties may serve as potential pathological markers. Because these markers provide mechanical information that cannot be replaced by conventional indicators, offering diagnostic and monitoring value, achieving accurate and quantitative measurements of RBC mechanical parameters has become an important direction in biomedical research.
Current techniques for characterizing the mechanical properties of RBCs can be broadly divided into population-based and single-cell measurements. Population-based techniques include microporous filtration, laser diffraction, microfluidics, and dielectrophoresis, while single-cell techniques include micropipette aspiration, atomic force microscopy (AFM), microfluidics, Brillouin microscopy, magnetic twisting cytometry, and optical tweezers (OT). Each technique has its own advantages and limitations, as summarized in Table 1. And detailed principles can be found in the reviews performed by Matthews et al. [7], Liang et al. [8], and Xing et al. [9]. Among these, OT enables non-invasive, contact-free, piconewton-force manipulation and quantitative measurement of stretching, rotation, and intercellular interaction forces. Due to their flexibility, high precision, minimal photothermal damage and extremely high force sensitivity, OT has become a powerful tool to reveal the microscopic mechanisms governing RBC mechanical behavior.
Recently, the number of studies using OT to investigate RBCs has grown rapidly, and several reviews have discussed the research of OT on RBCs. For instance, the review written by Zhu et al. [10]. provides a detailed introduction to the background and working principles of OT, as well as their various applications in RBC studies. However, it lacks a description of the manipulation modes of RBCs using OT and an introduction to the calculation formula of mechanical parameters. Although the work by Xie et al. [11]. introduces different manipulation modes for RBCs by OT, including controlled deformation, dynamic stretching, aggregation-disaggregation behavior, and blood cell separation, it does not cover the measurement and calculation of mechanical parameters, nor does it provide a systematic analysis of clinical translation. On the other hand, the review performed by Liang et al. [8] focuses on the analysis of RBC deformability in various disease states through different techniques. However, it does not provide a detailed introduction to OT specifically. Furthermore, it does not discuss how the integration of multiple techniques can be applied to study RBC mechanical properties.
However, as attention to OT grows in RBC research, a systematic introduction to the field is still lacking. This review provides a technical and application-focused reference centered on RBCs and OT. It systematically describes the parameters used to characterize RBC mechanical properties and the working principles of OT. Then it highlights two core manipulation modes (direct and indirect manipulation) along with sample preparation methods and the formulas for calculating mechanical parameters for each approach. The review also discusses how OT, combined with other techniques, can assess RBC mechanical properties under physiological and pathological conditions. In addition, it covers the role of OT in basic research on RBC aggregation and environmental stimuli, as well as the clinical significance of OT in blood storage, malaria, anemia, diabetes and so on. This work is expected to support the transition of this field from experimental research to clinical practice.

2. Manipulation of Red Blood Cells by Optical Tweezers

2.1. Mechanical Properties of Red Blood Cells

The Materials and Methods should be described with sufficient details to allow others to replicate and build on the published results. Please note that the publication of your manuscript implicates that you must make all materials, data, computer code, and protocols associated with the publication available to readers. Please disclose at the submission stage any restrictions on the availability of materials or information. New methods and protocols should be described in detail while well-established methods can be briefly described and appropriately cited.
The unique mechanical properties of RBCs primarily stem from their distinctive structure and composition. Mature RBCs exhibit a biconcave disc shape, with a diameter of approximately 6~8 μm, a peripheral thickness of 2~2.5 μm, and a central thickness of 0.8 μm. Their primary structure comprises three components: an outer phospholipid bilayer membrane, a submembrane hexagonal scaffold network of ankyrin-actin, and an internal high-concentration hemoglobin solution [35]. These three components work together to maintain the morphological stability of RBCs and determine their mechanical behavior.
The mechanical properties of RBCs can be quantitatively characterized through three types of parameters: macroscopic, membrane microscopic, and rheological.
  • Among the macro parameters, the deformation degree of RBCs can be characterized by elongation index (EI), relative elongation ratio (ε), deformation index (DI) and deformation ratio (DR), and the overall stiffness of RBCs was characterized by Young's modulus (E). The following equations are commonly used:
The ratio of stretched RBC length to initial length is defined as elongation index EI (or elongation ratio) [36,37]:
Preprints 216994 i001
Then the ratio of elongation to initial length is the relative elongation ratio ε:
Preprints 216994 i002
where L0 is the initial major axis or minor axis, and L is the major axis or minor axis after stretching. EI represents the ratio of the total length of a RBC after being stretched to its original length in a given direction, emphasizing the “overall proportion after elongation”. ε represents the ratio of the increase in length of the RBC to its original length, emphasizing the “incremental part of the deformation”. EI and ε are related by the equation ε=EI−1. In some articles, ε is also called the deformation index [38]. However, to facilitate comparative discussions of results obtained using OT, it is hoped that the nomenclature for the parameter corresponding to this formula will be standardized in the future.
In addition, if RBC is stretched into an ellipse, the DI can be obtained by classical ellipse-fitting method [16]:
Preprints 216994 i003
where Lx is the length of RBCs along the stretching direction, and Ly is the length of RBCs in the vertical stretching direction. DI quantifies the extent to which an RBC is deformed into an elliptical shape, ranging from 0 to 1. DI=0 indicates that the RBC remains circular, whereas DI=1 represents an extremely elongated RBC. This equation is commonly used in micropipette aspiration technology, microfluidic technology where the channel size is larger than the diameter of RBCs, and laser diffraction technology.
If the RBC is deformed into a parachute shape, or the channel size is smaller than the RBC diameter, it can be characterized by deformation ratio (DR) [39]:
Preprints 216994 i004
DR represents the ratio of the lengths of a RBC in two perpendicular directions, emphasizing the “anisotropy of the shape”.
Four parameters which are used to characterize deformability all describe changes in RBC dimensions and shape. However, RBCs exhibit different deformation behaviors depending on the deformation scenario, which in turn determines the choice of formulas and parameter ranges for quantifying the degree of deformation in the reported articles. In a sample chamber with no spatial restrictions, RBCs can be stretched into elliptical or dumbbell shapes, allowing the use of Equations (1)~(3) to characterize their deformation. In contrast, when stretched through a narrow channel, the cell membrane frequently contacts the channel walls, leading to a parachute-like shape, in which case Equation (4) is appropriate for calculating RBC deformability.
When an RBC is subjected to indentation, its overall stiffness is characterized by the Young's modulus (E) derived from the Hertz model [40]:
Preprints 216994 i005
where F is the applied force, ν is the Poisson's ratio of the RBC, R is the radius of the spherical indenter, and h is the indentation depth. In addition, the shear modulus (μ) can be calculated from E using the formula [40]:
Preprints 216994 i006
The Young's modulus reflects the combined contributions of the membrane skeleton, cytoplasmic viscosity, and intracellular fluid pressure [41]. It can be derived from force-distance curves. While atomic force microscopy is the main technique for measuring the Young's modulus of RBCs [27], the indentation method based on OT can also be used [3,42]. RBCs under pathological conditions often exhibit a higher Young's modulus than healthy cells, such as diabetes [43], sickle cell disease [44], and malaria [3]. In addition, RBCs with distinct morphologies also differ in their Young's modulus [42,45].
2.
Among the microscopic parameters of the membrane, shear stress and bending stress are the primary external forces applied. The membrane shear modulus (μ) reflects the membrane's resistance to shear deformation; e.g., healthy RBCs exhibit a μ of 2.4~11.3 μN/m, which increases tenfold during malaria infection [4]. Membrane shear viscosity (ηm) and relaxation constant (τ) are typically quantified through post-stretching relaxation processes [46,47,48]; Membrane bending modulus (B≈1.6×10-19 N•m) is obtained through localized membrane bending operations, with higher values indicating greater resistance to bending of the lipid bilayer [49,50,51].
3.
Rheological parameters reflect the flow behavior of RBCs interacting with the blood environment (such as plasma and other blood cells), including aggregation index, aggregation time, aggregation velocity, aggregation force, disaggregation force, electrophoretic mobility, and suspension viscosity contribution. Aggregation index serves as an indicator of RBC aggregation, typically observed using a rheometer. Cell manipulation techniques can acquire aggregation and disaggregation forces, while high-speed microscopy provides aggregation time and velocity. These parameters can assess blood viscosity and assist in determining thrombotic risk; for example, RBC aggregation force in systemic lupus erythematosus patients is nearly twice as high as that of healthy individuals [52,53].
RBC mechanical properties are sensitive to physiological and pathological changes in internal and external environments. Therefore, they have emerged as valuable biomarkers for biomedical detection and diagnosis.

2.2. Optical Tweezers Technology

Ashkin's team pioneered OT technique, achieving stable capture of microspheres using counter-propagating laser beams [54] and a single highly focused laser beam [55]. They formally named this technique “OT” for capturing, driving, and separating particles.
When a Gaussian beam is focused, the light intensity near the focal point exhibits a three-dimensional gradient distribution. Due to momentum conservation, the incident light upon penetrating or refracting by the particle surface generates a scattering force (along propagation) and a gradient force (along the intensity gradient) [55] (Figure 1a). Stable trapping occurs at the focal point where these forces balance. This condition is determined by optical parameters (wavelength, power, objective NA), particle properties (size, refractive index), and the surrounding medium. In the imaging path, integrated four-quadrant detectors enable sub-nanometer position tracking, transforming the trap into a piconewton-resolution mechanical sensor. For force calculation, Hooke's law is typically used:
F = k × Δx
where k is the optical trap stiffness, ∆x is the distance between the center of the manipulated object and the center of the optical trap, and F is the optical trap force.
To minimize photothermal damage in biological samples, OT was initially operated at visible wavelengths (e.g., 514.5 nm, 488 nm) [57], which often damaged cell membranes despite successful virus trapping. The approach was subsequently optimized by shifting to a 1064 nm wavelength, which enabled the safe capture and manipulation of RBCs without impairing cellular flexibility or morphology [58]. Comparative studies confirmed that 1064 nm irradiation has a significantly lesser impact on RBC deformability and stiffness than 785 nm [59]. Thus, 1064 nm is the prevalent choice for RBC on OT research, although other near-infrared wavelengths (e.g., 970–1550 nm [60,61]) are also utilized.
Based on differences in beam manipulation methods and system integration configurations, OT can be categorized into traditional optical tweezers, holographic optical tweezers(HOT), fiber-optic tweezers, surface plasmon optical tweezers, standing-wave optical tweezers, and photonic crystal optical tweezers [62,63]. This paper primarily focuses on traditional optical tweezers and holographic optical tweezers.
  • Traditional optical tweezers 
Traditional optical tweezers primarily comprise a near-infrared laser, beam expander, high numerical aperture (NA≥1) oil- or water-immersion objective, and a three-dimensional nanoscale-translation stage. Among these, a high numerical aperture microscope objective and a single optical trap are the main characteristics of traditional setups. The expanded laser beam is focused onto the entrance pupil of the objective (Figure 2a), where the oil immersion medium reduces spherical aberration and forms a three-dimensional optical trap with a focal-spot radius of ~0.6 λ/NA. Piezoelectric mirrors or PID-controlled displacement stages enable millisecond-scale nanoscale repositioning, supporting dragging, positioning, and stretching of RBCs. A beam-splitter prism at the objective’s back focal plane monitors transmitted light intensity. However, conventional systems generate only a single trap from one light source. Multiple optical trapping requires additional components such as an acousto-optic deflector (AOD) for time multiplexing or a polarizing beam splitter (PBS) and scanning galvanometer for spatial multiplexing [64,65,66] (Figure 2b). Owing to switching-speed and diffraction-efficiency limitations, the number of traps remains restricted, and crosstalk between two closely positioned traps remains difficult to avoid [67].
2.
Holographic optical tweezers 
Inserting a spatial light modulator (SLM) before the laser enters the objective can effectively produce multiple dynamic optical traps that are parallel in both space and time [68,69] (Figure 2c). The SLM modulates the wavefront phase through a liquid-crystal pixel array, encoding the designed target dynamic optical traps into a phase hologram. The position of each focal spot is determined by the phase grating period, while the intensity is adjusted by the local phase depth. The spots can be spaced below the diffraction limit, which not only improves diffraction efficiency but also generates a dense trap array. Additionally, HOT is primarily used to grasp and drag non-spherical objects. With computer-generated holograms, tens of independent optical traps can be created to achieve the capture and parallel manipulation of large non-spherical cells as well as multiple spherical particles [70]. Millisecond-level refresh rates enable real-time adjustment of these arrays, reducing experimental time and trapping errors. The ability to perform parallel, three-dimensional, and independent manipulation makes HOT an ideal tool for single-cell mechanical characterization.
By applying external forces and monitoring real-time deformation, OT enables characterization of RBC mechanical responses under varying stress conditions and elucidation of associated structural mechanisms. Two primary manipulation approaches are employed: (1) direct manipulation, in which optical forces induce small cellular deformations, and (2) indirect manipulation, where microbeads attached to RBCs membrane are trapped and moved to deform cells.

2.3. Direct Manipulation

In direct manipulation studies, to maintain RBCs in suspension, RBCs are typically suspended in solutions including 0.9% sodium chloride solution, 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline free of Mg2+ and Ca2+, and plasma [25,59,73]. Following suspension, sample chambers are frequently pre-treated with bovine serum albumin (BSA) (applied and air-dried) [73,74] or other agents such as polylysine and casein [75,76] to prevent adhesion and ensure reliable measurements.
Under direct trapping by one or two optical traps, an RBC rotates from its flat-lying state to make its cell plane parallel to the optical axis. However, with three or more optical traps, the RBC remains stably flat-lying. This phenomenon was first numerically validated by Tognato et al. using a ray-optics model of a native biconcave RBC [77]. Their findings indicate that with one or two traps, optical torque drives RBC rotation, and the beam focus tends to stabilize at the thickest part of the cell; increasing the number of optical traps allows control over the RBC's orientation.
To closely replicate RBC physiological conditions and acquire both the imaging and mechanical data during deformation, two direct optical manipulation methods are broadly applied: (1) single-tweezer trapping and dragging; (2) multi-tweezer stretching and manipulation.

2.3.1. Trap-and-Drag Operation Based on a Single Optical Trap

When one end of an RBC is held by an optical trap, its elasticity enables reversible deformation from a discocyte to a bullet-like shape under fluid shear stress (Figure 3). The membrane shear elasticity, μ, is calculated based on changes in the major axis [78] by:
Preprints 216994 i007
with
Preprints 216994 i008
where L is the length of the RBC after deformation, L0 is the length before deformation. η is the viscosity of the serum, plasma, or RBC suspension, ν is the velocity at which the optical trap drags the cell, Z1 is the distance from the RBC to the bottom of the sample chamber, and Z2 is the distance from the cell to the top of the chamber.
The shape recovery relaxation time, τ, is calculated from the exponential decay curve of the cell length [79] by:
Preprints 216994 i009
and the membrane viscosity, ηm, is then determined [79] by:
Preprints 216994 i010
Membrane shear elasticity, relaxation time and membrane viscosity together characterize the ability and rate of RBCs to resist deformation.
Since it was proposed by Ashkin in 1987 [58], the single-beam OT “drag-and-deform” method has matured into a reproducible technique for quantifying RBC mechanical properties. To improve accuracy and reliability, a viscous drag-based calibration method based on the single trap was also developed to precisely measure optical trapping forces on RBCs [74]. Its applications span from measuring membrane elasticity and viscosity to assessing the effects of laser damage [59], storage lesions [78,81], and diseases like sickle cell anemia [5,82] and thalassemia [83]. Despite its established role in biophysical research, the method’s low experimental throughput remains a limitation for broader application.

2.3.2. Stretch-and-Squeeze Operation Based on Dual Optical Tweezers and Multiple Optical Tweezers

Another common method for probing RBC mechanics uses two optical traps: one stationary and one movable, to apply stretching force (Figure 4a). By measuring the cell’s initial length, maximum extension, and trapping force, key mechanical parameters can be derived, such as deformation-index [38,74,76], stiffness [45,73], shear modulus [74,84], and relaxation time [46,73]).
To minimize photodamage, an innovative “tug-of-war” optical tweezer configuration generating divergent and elongated beams via SLM was developed (Figure 4b). This system achieves a trapping force of 15 pN at just 20 mW, nearly double that of conventional dual Gaussian-beam traps [74].
By varying the movement speed of the optical traps, it is possible to establish the correlation between DI and different cell morphologies, achieving cell classification [38,76,86]. In contrast to the macroscopic characterization provided by deformation-index, the shear modulus reflects microscopic membrane properties and is calculated from the measured deformation-index and trapping forces. Recent studies have shown that μ decreases under hypotonic conditions due to increased surface area and reduced tension [74]. Furthermore, finite element modeling and analysis, performed with COMSOL simulation software, enabled precise calculation of the stress distribution on the surface of deformed RBCs [84]. This work provided theoretical foundations for understanding the mechanical response of spherical RBC membranes in chemical environments.
Research on RBC mechanical dynamics has been advanced through new stretching modes and parameter definitions. Dual HOT enables stiffness measurement under small-strain conditions (<20%). Fatigue studies revealed that biconcave RBCs exhibit significantly greater stiffness increment (Δk=+2.3 pN/μm per cycle) than echinocytes during repeated stretching in early storage [45]. Here, the slope of the force-elongation curve under small-strain conditions is defined as the linear stiffness k, given by:
Preprints 216994 i014
where F is the optical trapping force and l is the RBC’s major-axis length. Furthermore, successive stretch-relaxation cycles show a progressive linear decrease in DI, a power-law increase in stiffness, and a 2.5-fold prolongation of relaxation time [73].
Although the two studies differ in how stiffness is defined, both approaches reveal consistent trends that capture the evolving elastic behavior of RBCs. Advancing beyond dual-trap systems, multi-trap configurations have enabled more complex RBC deformation studies. Three traps were used to form a “parachute-like” shape in RBCs, deriving an angular relaxation time that provides a unique metric for shape recovery dynamics [46] (Figure 4c). Recently, four holographic optical traps were also employed to symmetrically stretch RBCs while simultaneously monitoring deformation and forces in multiple directions [72] (Figure 4d).
Researches on RBC mechanical properties using multi-trap OT collectively establish a multidimensional framework for analyzing RBC mechanics, which offers key biomechanical indicators for applications in blood disease diagnostics, radiotherapy monitoring, and blood transfusion quality assessment.

2.4. Indirect Manipulation

Unlike direct optical stretching, the indirect method applies force non-invasively to minimize photodamage and avoid cell flipping. This maintains the RBC’s disc plane parallel to the focal plane, allowing CCD image acquisition and simultaneous analysis of both lateral and axial deformation.
Experimental sample preparation focuses on creating a “mechanical manipulation medium” by incubating RBCs with microbeads at a set ratio, forming stable attachments that act as “handles” for optical trapping. To prevent nonspecific adhesion of cells or beads to chamber walls, which would interfere with measurements, BSA can be applied to coat the chamber interior or be added directly to the suspension [87,88,89].
In early stages, unmodified silica or polystyrene microbeads with diameters ranging from 1~4 µm were commonly used. Later, microbeads functionalized with IgG [93], carboxyl [94], streptavidin [95], or amino groups [89] were developed to enhance binding specificity and stability. Meanwhile, force calibration methodologies evolved from hydrodynamic flow to stage displacement, Boltzmann statistics, and thermal fluctuation analysis, improving measurement precision from the nanonewton to the piconewton scale [96].
The dual-bead attachment strategy was first introduced in 1999 with two operation modes: the “single-tweezer pulling and single-bead anchoring” mode and the “dual-tweezer trapping, anchoring and translation” mode [90]. By gradually increasing the distance between the two optical traps, a gradient tensile force was applied (Figure 5a). The shear modulus (μ) was derived from the relationship between the applied force and the change in cell diameter at the cell poles under small deformations, given by:
Preprints 216994 i011
where Ly0 is the initial lateral diameter of the RBC (vertical to the force direction), Ly is the lateral diameter after deformation, and F is the applied tensile force. In the same year, Sleep et al. adopted a “fixed-translation” dual-tweezer configuration to investigate the contribution of the cytoskeletal network to the elasticity of nearly spherical RBCs [91]. Periodic triangular-wave or stepwise tensile forces were applied (Figure 5b), the parameters BH2 and shear modulus H were calculated based on Parker’s [97] axisymmetric shell elasticity theory:
Preprints 216994 i012
with
Preprints 216994 i013
where a is the bead radius, B is the bending modulus, F is the applied force, and ε is the axial relative elongation ratio of the cell, L0 and L are the initial and deformed axial diameters, respectively. Collectively, these two pioneering studies established a fundamental framework for calculating the RBC shear modulus, which has since become a reference standard for subsequent investigations. However, the spherical membrane model under small strain is different from the actual biconcave morphology of native cells.
Since 2003, OT stretching techniques have advanced toward large-deformation studies with improved precision. A finite element-based biconcave RBC model with and without cytoplasm enabled accurate mechanical quantification under forces up to 600 pN, overcoming earlier spherical simplifications [47]. Subsequent refinements included bead height correction for reliable cell-length measurements and deformation data under high force ~193 pN [92] (Figure 5c). More recently, a microbead indentation method was developed to probe lateral membrane stiffness, yielding results consistent with micropipette aspiration while avoiding strong cell-substrate interactions [42] (Figure 5d).
With continuous advances in OT manipulation strategies, measurable parameters have expanded from the membrane shear modulus under small deformations [90] to a diverse set of multidimensional mechanical indicators, including the shear modulus under large deformations [47], relaxation time [47], intercellular adhesion forces [98], apparent membrane viscosity [98], stiffness [42], membrane fluctuation power spectral density [94], and dynamic changes in cell height during stretching [95].

3. Application of Optical Tweezers in Red Blood Cell Research

3.1. Measurement and Study of Intercellular Interaction Forces

In physiological environments, RBCs usually do not exist in isolation; their functions rely heavily on intercellular interactions. The mechanical characteristics of RBC populations are directly reflected by their aggregation, disaggregation, and adhesion behaviors, which not only affect blood rheology and microcirculatory function but are also closely associated with various diseases. Therefore, the research scope of OT has extended beyond single-cell manipulation toward the investigation of collective mechanical properties of cell ensembles.
Using dual-trap and four-trap OT configurations to operate RBCs is a classical method for studying the aggregation characteristics of RBCs. Two RBCs were captured by dual traps and lifted 40 μm above the chamber bottom. The aggregation and disaggregation force of RBC-doublets were then measured by adjusting the light power and pulling dual optical traps (Figure 6a) [66]. This direct manipulation method can also be realized with only a set of double optical traps [80], which not only simplifies the operation steps, but also reduces the light damage of RBCs.
However, the traditional methods only focus on the aggregation and disaggregation behavior of RBC dimers under shear tension, ignoring the influence of the adhesive force between RBC discs on the aggregation behavior. A more physiological adhesion model was proposed by researchers: four traps generated by HOT were positioned pairwise on two RBCs to apply forces perpendicular to the disc plane, simulating “collision and separation” under full contact (Figure 6b) [99]. Through the evaluation of the aggregation and disaggregation of RBCs by OT, the regulatory effects of laser radiation, nanoparticles, the life span of RBCs, adhesion factors and other factors on the interaction of RBCs have been explored [66,102,103,104].
These studies have advanced quantitative measurements of RBC interaction forces from various perspectives. However, most are in vitro experiments that involve extensive dilution, washing, and resuspension. Although beneficial for single-cell manipulation and mechanical measurements, such treatments do not replicate the shear forces, complex plasma composition, and multicomponent interactions found in real blood flow. Thus, current results are more appropriate as methodological validation.
Due to antigen variant recognition technology can promote early disease diagnosis, quantitative analysis of cell surface antigen variation has attracted more and more attention. Traditional flow cytometry requires a high number of samples, and cannot achieve quantitative analysis of a small number of samples and single cells. The cell-tearing operation based on OT can solve this problem (Figure 6c) [100]. This approach enables highly sensitive quantitative analysis only with minimal fingertip blood volume, offering a novel approach for detecting surface antigen variations. In addition, the interaction behavior and related mechanisms between RBC and endothelial cells were explored by the same means [105].
These two studies have extended OT applications in RBC interaction research, showing strong methodological innovation. However, limitations remain: (1) Using laser power as a substitute for absolute force simplifies experiments but reduces comparability with other mechanical studies. (2) The change in RBC–endothelial adhesion force was weak and not statistically supported in all experimental groups.
In addition, OT can also quantitatively study RBCs-merozoites adhesion forces through a triple-cell system (“RBC-Plasmodium falciparum merozoite-RBC”) (Figure 6d). The traditional viewpoint holds that PfMSP1 protein dominates the initial attachment of Plasmodium, but high-precision OT experiments showed no significant change in adhesion forces after PfMSP1 knockdown [101]. In Dantu blood group, it was also found that RBCs resist merozoite invasion not by reducing adhesion but by increasing membrane tension, providing key mechanical evidence for the screening of vaccine targets for malaria [75].
The samples in these two studies are representative, and cross-validation using multiple biological techniques makes their conclusions mechanistically convincing. However, such representativeness also introduces single-cell heterogeneity, requiring a large sample size to ensure data stability.

3.2. Study on Bioinformation of Red Blood Cells

The mechanical parameters of RBCs directly reflect membrane structural characteristics, physiological status, and species adaptability. With integration of biochemical analysis methods, OT has advanced RBC bioinformation research from qualitative mechanism exploration to quantitative characterization.
This technology has enabled quantitative analysis of key determinants in RBC aggregation. It was demonstrated that Ca2+ influx and phosphatidylserine exposure, rather than lysophosphatidic acid, are responsible for irreversible adhesion, excluding group-effect interference [99]. Using OT combined with laser aggregation assays and flow cytometry, researchers showed that inhibition of glycoprotein receptor IIbIIIa (GPIIbIIIa) significantly reduced aggregation forces (Figure 7a), revealing a protein-dependent regulatory mechanism [104]. Subsequent studies further clarified the distinct roles of plasma proteins such as fibrinogen and albumin in modulating aggregation [16] (Figure 7b). Additionally, experiments demonstrated that nitric oxide regulates RBC-endothelial adhesion via the soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) pathway, exhibiting a bell-shaped dependence on L-arginine concentration [105] (Figure 7c).
Although these studies included good negative and pharmacological controls (e.g., Ca2+ removal, GPIIbIIIa inhibitors, NO donors, or sGC inhibitors), some mechanisms remain largely inferred from pharmacological inhibitors, lacking direct molecular evidence to confirm specific receptors or binding sites.
RBCs exhibit varying lifespans within blood vessels, and experiments have shown that aggregation force increases with cell age [103] (Figure 7d), and that RBCs of varying densities exhibit significant differences in shear modulus [89]. This suggests that density-gradient centrifugation can effectively minimizes sample heterogeneity and reduces measurement errors. However, Percoll gradient separation reflects RBC density rather than precise cell age. Thus, the classification of "young" versus "aged" RBCs requires further validation.
Additionally, the marked differences in DI and Raman spectral also revealed the differences between various morphologies of RBCs [76] and different species [86], such as camel (0.024±0.019) and human (0.215±0.061), offering new insights into the adaptive mechanisms of RBCs in extreme environments.

3.3. Study on the Effect of Different External Environmental Stimuli on Red Blood Cells

Investigating RBC intrinsic mechanical properties under complex microenvironments enhances understanding of relationships between their structure and function.
Laser irradiation studies demonstrated that wavelength and exposure dose modulate RBC stiffness and deformability: 785 nm near-infrared light induces greater stiffening than 1064 nm [59], and visible-light irradiation triggers oxidative damage through photodissociation of hemoglobin-bound oxygen [106]. Continuous low-dose 450 nm exposure enhances deformability, whereas short-pulse He-Ne irradiation reduces aggregation force [66,107]. In radiobiology, high-dose irradiation decreases DI, making it a potential biomarker for radiation responses [85].
Osmotic stress also plays a critical role in influencing RBC mechanical behavior. OT–based stretching and indentation experiments have shown that shear modulus and stiffness of RBC increase proportionally with osmotic pressure [42,93]. The deformability ranking follows: hypotonic > isotonic > hypertonic conditions [74] (Figure 8a). The study of laser trapping with Raman spectroscopy (LTRS) at the molecular level revealed that osmotic changes alter the concentration of intracellular heme, reorganize membrane structures, and induce protein conformational variations, thereby regulating overall mechanical responses of RBC [108].
Regarding chemical stimulation, LTRS demonstrated that bisphenol A damages membrane and hemoglobin structures [109] (Figure 8b); ethanol exposure induces deoxygenation and irreversible morphological loss [88]; and hydrogen peroxide increases shear modulus while reducing deformability [87], offering insights into environmental toxicology and blood-disease mechanisms.
With expanding biomedical applications of nanomaterials, nanoparticle (NP) biocompatibility with RBCs has drawn increasing attention. LTRS showed that nanoparticles, including gold and silver, induce mechanical alterations in RBC membranes [111] (Figure 8c). Nanodiamonds exhibit strongest interference on RBC interactions, whereas polymer-based NP and nitride-based plasmonic NP show superior biocompatibility, guiding nanodrug carrier design [102,110].
In mechanical fatigue studies, RBCs of different morphologies were repeatedly stretched using dual HOT, demonstrating that storage duration and stretching cycles increase stiffness and prolong recovery time (Figure 8d). These findings validated universal principles of “stretch-induced stiffness enhancement” and “rheological non-scalability”, revealing that accumulated mechanical strain drives rheological degradation of RBCs [45,73].
These studies have revealed RBC functional changes under external stimuli at multiple levels, including single-cell mechanics, morphology, and hemoglobin molecular state. However, most mechanistic interpretations rely on inferences from mechanical characterization, Raman shifts, or morphology, lacking direct validation of membrane skeleton proteins, ATP levels, oxidative damage markers, hemoglobin oxygen affinity, and ion channel function.

3.4. Study on Related Hematological Diseases

Hematological diseases are caused by abnormalities in blood cells, plasma proteins, or hematopoietic functions. OT and their combined technologies have been widely applied to the study of diseases related to RBCs, such as thalassemia [83,112,113] and sickle cell disease (SCD) [5,48,82].
Thalassemia induces abnormal mechanical and molecular properties of RBCs. LTRS has revealed that RBCs from β-thalassemia patients have significantly lower oxidative capacity and 40% higher stiffness than normal RBCs [112,115]. Additionally, RBC elasticity and membrane viscosity have shown decreased elasticity and increased membrane viscosity in diseased cells (Figure 9a). Combined with quantum dot detection, a reduction in the negative surface charge of pathological RBC membranes has also been observed [83]. These findings suggest that disease-induced damage to membrane structures (such as surface glycoproteins and the cytoskeleton-associated band 3 protein) alters both the mechanical and electrical properties of RBCs.
In sickle cell disease (SCD), the HbS mutation leads to increased RBC rigidity and reduced deformability. Compared to healthy RBCs, the elastic modulus of RBCs from sickle cell trait donors (HbAS) significantly increased during storage, while hydroxyurea (HU) treatment restored deformability of RBCs [5,82] (Figure 9b). In addition to measuring elastic modulus, 1064 nm optical traps allow non-destructive measurement of folding angle, rotational features, and deformation relaxation time of RBCs with SCD, showing more obvious distinctions in HU-treated samples [48,116]. The Raman tweezers systems also revealed that RBCs with SCD are more prone to deoxygenation under mechanical stress [117]. Besides, mannose-binding lectin (MBL), by binding to the membrane, alters both the membrane and the cytoskeleton, thereby increasing membrane stability and reducing the elasticity of RBCs with HbSS [118]. This reveals the regulatory role of the immune molecule MBL in RBC mechanical properties.
However, the number of mechanical investigations on other disorders like acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [119], paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) [120], hereditary elliptocytosis (HE) [121], iron deficiency anemia (IDA) [122] remain relatively limited.

3.5. Study on Red Blood Cells in Non-Hematological Diseases

Beyond hematological disorders, diseases such as malaria, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes profoundly also affect the RBC microenvironment, leading to abnormalities in aggregation, deformability, and elasticity.
During the malaria merozoite stage, the shear modulus of infected RBCs increases up to tenfold (≈53.3 N/m), indicating cytoskeletal remodeling by parasite-derived proteins [4]. Microsphere indentation experiments similarly revealed elevated shear stiffness [3]. Assuming stiffening of the local membrane skeleton, these experimental findings agree well with numerical calculations based on the Skalak constitutive model for RBCs, providing further insight into how Plasmodium infection affects the RBC membrane [123]. Crick’s group directly captured parasite invasion events and measured a detachment force of ~40 pN, further demonstrating that heparin significantly reduces adhesion strength and invasion rate [124]. Using OT combined with flicker spectroscopy, Dantu blood group RBCs were shown to display higher membrane tension (1.22×10-6 N/m) and an invasion threshold of ~3.8×10-7 N/m, supporting a “high-tension invasion-resistance” mechanism [75]. Additionally, the combination of gene knockout and OT identified the PfEBA/PfRH protein family, not PfMSP1, dominates adhesion, clarifying the molecular biomechanics of malaria invasion [101] (Figure 9c).
Cardiovascular diseases significantly modify RBCs rheology. In hypertensive patients, aggregation time decreased by 24%, disaggregation force increased by 28%, providing one of the explanation for the elevated blood viscosity in hypertension, with the FD/FA ratio showing diagnostic value [125]. Through combined OT-aggregometry-capillaroscopy analysis, aggregation time in CHD patients decreased by 27%, and those with CHD comorbid T2DM exhibited even stronger aggregation [114] (Figure 9d).
In diabetes mellitus, mechanical impairment of RBCs is strongly associated with microangiopathy. OT measurements indicated significantly reduced DI in type 2 diabetes and diabetic retinopathy, negatively correlated with initial RBCs size [38]. Fetal RBCs from gestational diabetes displayed increased membrane tension and bending modulus using a dual time-resolved membrane fluctuation spectroscopy based on OT [126]. Raman tweezers (785 nm) further detected distinct spectral differences at 1003 cm-1 and 753 cm-1, achieving 100% classification accuracy from diabetes erythrocyte using PCA-LDA [127]. Furthermore, OT technology provides a method for the early diagnosis of diabetes. Acute high-glucose exposure (early common symptoms of diabetes) enhanced oxidative stress, reduced membrane elasticity, and decreased elongation ratio with rising glucose concentration [128].
Although these studies provide multiparametric support for early diagnosis and disease monitoring, they lack in-depth exploration of the underlying molecular mechanisms.

3.6. Study on Drug Evaluation and Development

Drugs generally reach all parts of body through the blood circulatory system, which also affect mechanical properties of RBCs.
For pharmacological research, integrated with fluorescence imaging and flow cytometry, OT experiments revealed several drugs can reduce RBC membrane elasticity and stiffness, such as lithium salts, the first-line treatment for bipolar disorder [129]; vitamin E, an antioxidant used for stored RBC preservation [81]; and doxorubicin, a chemotherapy agent for acute myeloid leukemia [119]. These findings provide new biophysical evidence for understanding drug-induced cytotoxicity mechanisms.
Though Raman tweezers, common intravenous infusion solutions (such as 0.9% saline, Ringer's lactate, and Plasmalyte-A) induced hemoglobin deoxygenation, impairing RBCs oxygen-carrying capacity, whereas RBCs in plasma demonstrated superior anti-deoxygenation properties [130,131]. Notably, hydroxyethyl starch, a solutions with safety concerns, was observed to impair both oxygenation state and membrane structure of RBCs [132].
These studies indicate that saline and other crystalloids should not be treated as "uninfluential backgrounds" when assessing drug effects on RBCs. Plasma or more physiological control conditions are recommended. Otherwise, drug and diluent effects may be confounded.

3.7. Application in Quality Evaluation of Artificial Red Blood Cells

Cultured RBCs (cRBCs) offer a promising solution to growing the demand for safe blood, yet their morphology and mechanical properties remain distinct from native RBCs (nRBCs), demanding high-precision evaluation.
The oscillatory OT system can employ an hourglass-shaped optical trap to capture cRBCs and apply axial oscillations. By analyzing high-frequency scattering signals and membrane fluctuations, results showed that cRBCs cultured with human platelet lysate exhibited biomechanical properties most similar to nRBCs, consistent with measurements from digital holographic microscopy [133]. Despite comparable membrane elasticity and protein expression, a lipid deficiency in cRBCs caused their morphological and mechanical impairments, analysed by integrated OT-AFM-SEM, also highlighting the utility of OT as a critical tool for evaluating cRBC quality [41].
However, these conclusions are mainly based on in vitro single-cell experiments, and factors like maturation stage, cell heterogeneity, and measurement methods may influence the mechanical parameters. Thus, further validation (e.g., causal lipid interventions, high-resolution membrane skeleton analysis, and in vivo models) is needed to confirm whether these mechanical similarities can assess cRBC quality.

4. Study of Red Blood Cells by Optical Tweezers Combined with Other Techniques

In conventional LTRS experiments, one laser beam is dedicated to Raman signal detection, while the other beams function as optical traps to capture RBCs, apply mechanical forces, and induce deformation, thereby enabling the acquisition of deformation and mechanical data. Thus, LTRS has been used to simultaneously study the mechanical and chemical properties of RBCs (Figure 10a).
Using dual-trap stretching, an LTRS study revealed that β-thalassemia RBCs have a 40% higher membrane shear modulus and a weaker oxygenating capacity compared to normal RBCs [115]. These results indicate that the genetic defects underlying thalassemia, which primarily affect hemoglobin structure, also significantly impact RBC mechanical properties. Moreover, LTRS has been applied to investigate RBCs in malaria [136], sickle cell disease [137], and diabetes [127], highlighting its potential as a diagnostic tool.
However, during optical trapping, the effect of light-induced protein oxidation on shear modulus is unavoidable. To overcome this problem, Raj’s group [138] used an indirect stretching approach in which RBCs were tethered to micro-beads, which significantly reduced laser-induced damage to the cells. They found that once cell deformation exceeded 10%, several Raman peaks corresponding to hemoglobin and protein vibration modes rose and then saturated, suggesting that external force markedly alters the chemical structure of intracellular molecules.
To minimize laser-induced damage to RBCs in LTRS, a light-sheet Raman tweezers system that uses a single laser beam for both Raman excitation and optical trapping was developed. The system can achieve stable capture at a low power density of 3.8×104 W/cm2, cutting power demand seven-fold [139], and enhancing biocompatibility and clinical potential by minimizing photodamage and heme aggregation.
With its “molecular fingerprint” characteristic, Raman spectroscopy enables non-destructive detection of structural changes in intracellular biomolecules. Its introduction endows OT with an additional capability about label-free chemical information detection.
Conventional OT systems are incapable of three-dimensional imaging of RBCs, making it impossible to track the underlying causes of the shape changes observed from a restricted perspective (top-down view) after RBCs are captured. To overcome this limitation, Mohanty’s team [140] integrated confocal fluorescence microscopy into an OT system, achieving fluorescence imaging and dynamic tracking of RBCs, revealing laser-induced orientation aligned with polarization rather than folding into rods.
Given that OT cannot discriminate between physical or chemical adhesion during RBC aggregation, flow cytometry was also combined with OT, demonstrating fibrinogen accumulation at cell-contact regions and confirming that GPIIbIIIa-mediated adhesion governs RBC aggregation, which can be reduced by GPIIbIIIa inhibitors [104].
To investigate the composition of RBC membrane tethers, researchers used a complementary setup of OT and confocal microscopy. Along with viscosity and bending modulus measurements, they showed that the membrane tether is mainly supported by the lipid bilayer, with no F-actin signal detected in tether regions [134] (Figure 10b).
Through specific labeling, fluorescence microscopy enables highly sensitive visualization of cellular structures, molecular distribution, and dynamic processes. The integration of OT with confocal fluorescence imaging and flow cytometry has progressively expanded RBC mechanics researches from the overall elasticity of whole cells to morphological changes and mechanical regulatory mechanisms.
Conventional OT enables non-contact mechanical measurements but suffer from low throughput and difficulties in continuous analysis, whereas microfluidics offers high-throughput advantages but lacks precise single-cell manipulation. Combining high-precision optical manipulation with high-throughput microfluidics can break through the constraints of a single technology.
By integrating periodic chopped laser beams with microfluidic channels, researchers achieved non-contact stretching of RBCs during continuous transport [135] (Figure 10c). To overcome the low efficiency of single-channel capture and frequent clogging in multi-channel systems, a multi-channel microfluidic chip with pressure-release structures and time-shared OT was designed, achieving 100 cells/min throughput and >90% capture efficiency, and revealing membrane stiffening in pathological RBCs [65].
Beyond mechanical measurements, OT-microfluidic technology has also achieved label-free cell sorting. By exploiting differences in escape velocity, researchers obtained 95% sorting efficiency for healthy and thalassemic RBCs at a lower cost [113]. Another design, using an arc-protrusion chip with stationary tweezers, simplified the system while maintaining high biocompatibility, attaining >95% purity and >90% viability for sorting B16F10 cells from RBCs [141].
The combination of OT and microfluidics overcomes their limitations, enabling efficient measurement of RBC mechanical properties and supporting clinical diagnosis. However, the feasibility of this method in complex and heterogeneous biological samples requires further validation.

5. Conclusions and Outlook

OT has developed into a critical tool in RBC mechanics research. Their evolution is marked by three key advances: the transition from basic manipulation to performance-optimized systems, the integration with complementary techniques for multidimensional analysis, and the expansion from studying healthy cells to clinical applications in disease diagnosis. These developments have revealed the relationship and differences between the global and local mechanical properties of RBCs, and their interaction mechanisms, providing new insights for medical diagnostics.
However, OT technology still faces several challenges in RBC mechanics research. (1) Although novel systems have been developed to reduce photothermal damage[74,139], manipulation flexibility of system remains limited. (2) Current studies mainly focus on highly RBC-associated diseases (e.g., sickle cell disease, malaria, and diabetes), whereas research on diseases with lower correlation but potential value (e.g., Alzheimer's disease) remains insufficient. (3) Limited clinical samples hinder the development of its clinical application. (4) OT has been demonstrated to trap and manipulate RBCs in the zebrafish caudal artery and mouse ear capillaries [142,143]. However, due to multiple light scattering in tissue, a Gaussian beam cannot form an effective optical trap at depth, making in vivo manipulation in humans currently unachievable. (5) More critically, most OT systems are low-throughput, unsuitable for rapid clinical testing and large-scale studies.
Looking ahead, the development directions of OT in RBC mechanical studies are becoming clear. (1) Achieving light focusing, trapping, and imaging in deep tissue is a key research direction for applying OT to the non-invasive study of RBC mechanical behavior within the human body [144]. (2) The integration with microfluidics shows greater potential than flow cytometry, with label-free RBC sorting already achieved to overcome single-cell throughput limitations [113]. However, only the deformation index is currently obtained in this direction; future work is expected to enable high-throughput analysis of more RBC mechanical parameters. (3) Culturing RBCs in vitro allows OT, together with transcription, gene editing, and membrane composition control, to explore the connection between RBC mechanical parameters and molecular [41]. (4) Additionally, the combination with machine learning will significantly enhance data analysis of force and spectroscopic measurements, enabling faster and more accurate interpretation [145,146]. These advances are expected to open new avenues for both fundamental research and clinical applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.Y., Y.S. and S.J.; methodology, X.Y. and J.F.; formal analysis, Y.S. and J.F.; investigation, X.Y., Y.S. and H.J.; data curation, Y.S. and H.J.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Y. and Y.S.; writing—review and editing, X.Y., Y.S., H.J., J.F. and S.J.; visualization, X.Y. and Y.S.; supervision, Y.S. and S.J.; project administration, X.Y. and S.J.; funding acquisition, S.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22202167) and National Key Research and Development Project of China (No. 2023YFF0613603).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
RBC Red blood cell
OT Optical tweezers
AFM Atomic force microscopy
EI Elongation index
DI Deformation index
DR Deformation ratio
HOT Holographic optical tweezers
AOD Acousto-optic deflector
PBS Polarizing beam splitter
SLM Spatial light modulator
BSA Bovine serum albumin
HSA Human serum albumin
GPIIbIIIa Glycoprotein receptor IIbIIIa
sGC soluble guanylate cyclase
LTRS Laser trapping with Raman spectroscopy
NP Nanoparticles
SCD Sickle cell disease
Hbβ Hemoglobin Beta
HbA Hemoglobin A
HbSS Hemoglobin S-S. HbSS represents sickle cell anemia patients.
HbAS Hemoglobin A-S. HbAS represents sickle cell trait carriers.
HU Hydroxyurea
CHD Coronary heart disease
T2DM Type 2 diabetes mellitus
MBL Mannose-binding lectin
AML Acute myeloid leukemia
PNH Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria
HE Hereditary elliptocytosis
cRBCs Cultured red blood cells
nRBCs Native red blood cells

References

  1. Safeukui, I.; Buffet, P.A.; Deplaine, G.; Perrot, S.; Brousse, V.; Ndour, A.; Nguyen, M.; Mercereau-Puijalon, O.; David, P.H.; Milon, G.; et al. Quantitative Assessment of Sensing and Sequestration of Spherocytic Erythrocytes by the Human Spleen. Blood 2012, 120, 424–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gómez, F.; Silva, L.S.; Teixeira, D.E.; Agero, U.; Pinheiro, A.A.S.; Viana, N.B.; Pontes, B. Plasmodium Falciparum Maturation across the Intra-Erythrocytic Cycle Shifts the Soft Glassy Viscoelastic Properties of Red Blood Cells from a Liquid-like towards a Solid-like Behavior. Exp. Cell Res. 2020, 397, 112370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. N’guessan, A.A.-B.; Yale, P.; Konin, E.J.M.; Kouacou, M.A.; Jérémie, Z.T. Characterization of Red Blood Cells Infected by Plasmodium Falciparum Using Optical Tweezers. Sci. Afr. 2025, 27, e02553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Suresh, S.; Spatz, J.; Mills, J.P.; Micoulet, A.; Dao, M.; Lim, C.T.; Beil, M.; Seufferlein, T. Connections between Single-Cell Biomechanics and Human Disease States: Gastrointestinal Cancer and Malaria. Acta Biomater. 2005, 1, 15–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Brandão, M.M.; Saad, S.T.O.; Cezar, C.L.; Fontes, A.; Costa, F.F.; Barjas-Castro, M.L. Elastic Properties of Stored Red Blood Cells from Sickle Trait Donor Units. Vox Sang. 2003, 85, 213–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kruchinina, M.V.; Gromov, A.A.; Generalov, V.M.; Kruchinin, V.N. Possible Differential Diagnosis of the Degrees of Rheological Disturbances in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus by Dielectrophoresis of Erythrocytes. J. Pers. Med. 2020, 10, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Matthews, K.; Lamoureux, E.S.; Myrand-Lapierre, M.-E.; Duffy, S.P.; Ma, H. Technologies for Measuring Red Blood Cell Deformability. Lab Chip 2022, 22, 1254–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liang, M.; Ming, D.; Zhong, J.; Shannon, C.S.; Rojas-Carabali, W.; Agrawal, K.; Ai, Y.; Agrawal, R. Pathophysiological Associations and Measurement Techniques of Red Blood Cell Deformability. Biosensors 2025, 15, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xing, F.; Hu, F.; Yang, J.; Pan, L.; Xu, J. Structural and Functional Studies of Erythrocyte Membrane-Skeleton by Single-Cell and Single-Molecule Techniques. J. Innov. Opt. Health Sci. 2019, 12, 1830004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhu, R.; Avsievich, T.; Popov, A.; Meglinski, I. Optical Tweezers in Studies of Red Blood Cells. Cells 2020, 9, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xie, Y.; Liu, X. Multifunctional Manipulation of Red Blood Cells Using Optical Tweezers. J. Biophotonics 2022, 15, e202100315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Baskurt, O.K.; Gelmont, D.; Meiselman, H.J. Red Blood Cell Deformability in Sepsis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1998, 157, 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Selvan, R.; Parthasarathi, P.; Iyengar, S.S.; Ananthamurthy, S.; Bhattacharya, S. Estimation of Membrane Bending Modulus of Stiffness Tuned Human Red Blood Cells from Micropore Filtration Studies. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0226640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bunyaratvej, A.; Butthep, P.; Sae-Ung, N.; Fucharoen, S.; Yuthavong, Y. Reduced Deformability of Thalassemic Erythrocytes and Erythrocytes with Abnormal Hemoglobins and Relation with Susceptibility to Plasmodium Falciparum Invasion. Blood 1992, 79, 2460–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gutierrez, M.; Shamoun, M.; Seu, K.G.; Tanski, T.; Kalfa, T.A.; Eniola-Adefeso, O. Characterizing Bulk Rigidity of Rigid Red Blood Cell Populations in Sickle-Cell Disease Patients. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 7909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Semenov, A.; Lugovtsov, A.; Ermolinskiy, P.; Lee, K.; Priezzhev, A. Problems of Red Blood Cell Aggregation and Deformation Assessed by Laser Tweezers, Diffuse Light Scattering and Laser Diffractometry. Photonics 2022, 9, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pinho, D.; Carvalho, V.; Gonçalves, I.M.; Teixeira, S.; Lima, R. Visualization and Measurements of Blood Cells Flowing in Microfluidic Systems and Blood Rheology: A Personalized Medicine Perspective. J. Pers. Med. 2020, 10, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Grigorev, G.; Lebedev, A.; Wang, X.; Qian, X.; Maksimov, G.; Lin, L. Advances in Microfluidics for Single Red Blood Cell Analysis. Biosensors 2023, 13, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jiang, H.; Li, X.; Liu, Z.; Luo, S.; Huang, J.; Chen, C.; Chen, R.; Li, F. A Microfluidic Approach for Assessing the Rheological Properties of Healthy Versus Thalassemic Red Blood Cells. Micromachines 2025, 16, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jeon, H.-J.; Lee, H.; Yoon, D.S.; Kim, B.-M. Dielectrophoretic Force Measurement of Red Blood Cells Exposed to Oxidative Stress Using Optical Tweezers and a Microfluidic Chip. Biomed. Eng. Lett. 2017, 7, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qiang, Y.; Liu, J.; Du, E. Dielectrophoresis Testing of Nonlinear Viscoelastic Behaviors of Human Red Blood Cells. Micromachines 2018, 9, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hu, Q.; Wang, Z.; Shen, L.; Zhao, G. Label-Free and Noninvasive Single-Cell Characterization for the Viscoelastic Properties of Cryopreserved Human Red Blood Cells Using a Dielectrophoresis-On-a-Chip Approach. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 10245–10255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hochmuth, R.M. Micropipette Aspiration of Living Cells. J. Biomech. 2000, 33, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Švelc, T.; Svetina, S. Stress-Free State of the Red Blood Cell Membrane and the Deformation of Its Skeleton. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2012, 17, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wei, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhang, C.; Dao, M.; Gong, X. Evolution of Surface Area and Membrane Shear Modulus of Matured Human Red Blood Cells during Mechanical Fatigue. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 8563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yeow, N.; Tabor, R.F.; Garnier, G. Atomic Force Microscopy: From Red Blood Cells to Immunohaematology. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 249, 149–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gao, Z.; Sun, H.; Yang, S.; Li, M.; Qi, N.; Cui, J. Red Blood Cell-like Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Particles: Influence of Particle Stiffness on Biological Behaviors. ACS Macro Lett. 2024, 13, 966–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Meng, Z.; Bustamante Lopez, S.C.; Meissner, K.E.; Yakovlev, V.V. Subcellular Measurements of Mechanical and Chemical Properties Using Dual Raman-Brillouin Microspectroscopy. J. Biophotonics 2016, 9, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Windberger, U.; Sparer, A.; Elsayad, K. The Role of Plasma in the Yield Stress of Blood. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 2023, 84, 369–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Anand, A.; Ambekar, Y.; Rogers, S.; Conway, A.; Baer, M.; Law, J.; Poland, A.; Rowden, T.; Setua, S.; Adao, R.; et al. Contact-Free Single Cell Assay for Assessing RBC Mechanical Properties Using Brillouin Microscopy: Evaluation of Anti-Sickling Therapeutics. Blood 2025, 146, 6490–6490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Puig-De-Morales, M.; Grabulosa, M.; Alcaraz, J.; Mullol, J.; Maksym, G.N.; Fredberg, J.J.; Navajas, D. Measurement of Cell Microrheology by Magnetic Twisting Cytometry with Frequency Domain Demodulation. J. Appl. Physiol. 2001, 91, 1152–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fedosov, D.A.; Lei, H.; Caswell, B.; Suresh, S.; Karniadakis, G.E. Multiscale Modeling of Red Blood Cell Mechanics and Blood Flow in Malaria. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2011, 7, e1002270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bustamante, C.J.; Chemla, Y.R.; Liu, S.; Wang, M.D. Optical Tweezers in Single-Molecule Biophysics. Nat. Rev. Methods Prim. 2021, 1, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, H.; Guo, Y.; Zou, R.; Hu, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, F.; Ju, L.A. Recent Advances of Optical Tweezers–Based Dynamic Force Spectroscopy and Mechanical Measurement Assays for Live-Cell Mechanobiology. Front. Phys. 2022, 10, 771111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mohandas, N.; Gallagher, P.G. Red Cell Membrane: Past, Present, and Future. Blood 2008, 112, 3939–3948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Forsyth, A.M.; Wan, J.; Ristenpart, W.D.; Stone, H.A. The Dynamic Behavior of Chemically “Stiffened” Red Blood Cells in Microchannel Flows. Microvasc. Res. 2010, 80, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zeng, N.F.; Ristenpart, W.D. Mechanical Response of Red Blood Cells Entering a Constriction. Biomicrofluidics 2014, 8, 064123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Agrawal, R.; Smart, T.; Nobre-Cardoso, J.; Richards, C.; Bhatnagar, R.; Tufail, A.; Shima, D.; H. Jones, P.; Pavesio, C. Assessment of Red Blood Cell Deformability in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Diabetic Retinopathy by Dual Optical Tweezers Stretching Technique. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 15873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Faustino, V.; Rodrigues, R.O.; Pinho, D.; Costa, E.; Santos-Silva, A.; Miranda, V.; Amaral, J.S.; Lima, R. A Microfluidic Deformability Assessment of Pathological Red Blood Cells Flowing in a Hyperbolic Converging Microchannel. Micromachines 2019, 10, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mahaffy, R.E.; Park, S.; Gerde, E.; Käs, J.; Shih, C.K. Quantitative Analysis of the Viscoelastic Properties of Thin Regions of Fibroblasts Using Atomic Force Microscopy. Biophys. J. 2004, 86, 1777–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bernecker, C.; Lima, M.; Kolesnik, T.; Lampl, A.; Ciubotaru, C.; Leita, R.; Kolb, D.; Fröhlich, E.; Schlenke, P.; Holzapfel, G.A.; et al. Biomechanical Properties of Native and Cultured Red Blood Cells–Interplay of Shape, Structure and Biomechanics. Front. Physiol. 2022, 13, 979298–979312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yale, P.; Kouacou, M.A.; Konin, J.-M.E.; Megnassan, E.; Zoueu, J.T. Lateral Deformation of Human Red Blood Cells by Optical Tweezers. Micromachines 2021, 12, 1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Di Santo, R.; Niccolini, B.; Rizzi, A.; Bertini, L.; Marafon, D.P.; Vaccaro, M.; Cristallo, F.; Rosa, E.; Tartaglione, L.; Leo, L.; et al. Sensing Biomechanical Alterations in Red Blood Cells of Type 1 Diabetes Patients: Potential Markers for Microvascular Complications. Biosensors 2024, 14, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Maciaszek, J.L.; Andemariam, B.; Lykotrafitis, G. Microelasticity of Red Blood Cells in Sickle Cell Disease. J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des. 2011, 46, 368–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Stilgoe, A.B.; Kashchuk, A.V.; Balanant, M.-A.; Santangelo, D.; Nieminen, T.A.; Sauret, E.; Flower, R.; Rubinsztein-Dunlop, H. Tired and Stressed: Direct Holographic Quasi-Static Stretching of Aging Echinocytes and Discocytes in Plasma Using Optical Tweezers [Invited]. Biomed. Opt. Express 2024, 15, 656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bronkhorst, P.J.; Streekstra, G.J.; Grimbergen, J.; Nijhof, E.J.; Sixma, J.J.; Brakenhoff, G.J. A New Method to Study Shape Recovery of Red Blood Cells Using Multiple Optical Trapping. Biophys. J. 1995, 69, 1666–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Dao, M.; Lim, C.T.; Suresh, S. Mechanics of the Human Red Blood Cell Deformed by Optical Tweezers. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 2003, 51, 2259–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mohi, S.M.; Saadon, H.L.; Khalaf, A.A. Laser Tweezers as a Biophotonic Tool to Investigate the Efficacy of Living Sickle Red Blood Cells in Response to Optical Deformation. Biophys. Rev. 2021, 13, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Evans, E.A. Bending Elastic Modulus of Red Blood Cell Membrane Derived from Buckling Instability in Micropipet Aspiration Tests. Biophys. J. 1983, 43, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hochmuth, R.M.; Waugh, R.E. Erythrocyte Membrane Elasticity and Viscosity. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 1987, 49, 209–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Paul, R.; Zhou, Y.; Nikfar, M.; Razizadeh, M.; Liu, Y. Quantitative Absorption Imaging of Red Blood Cells to Determine Physical and Mechanical Properties. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 38923–38936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Khokhlova, M.D.; Lyubin, E.V.; Zhdanov, A.G.; Rykova, S.Yu.; Sokolova, I.A.; Fedyanin, A.A. Normal and System Lupus Erythematosus Red Blood Cell Interactions Studied by Double Trap Optical Tweezers: Direct Measurements of Aggregation Forces. J. Biomed. Opt. 2012, 17, 025001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ye, S.S.M.; Kim, S. A Mechanistic Model of Cross-Bridge Migration in RBC Aggregation and Disaggregation. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 1049878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ashkin, A. Acceleration and Trapping of Particles by Radiation Pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1970, 24, 156–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ashkin, A.; Dziedzic, J.M.; Bjorkholm, J.E.; Chu, S. Observation of a Single-Beam Gradient Force Optical Trap for Dielectric Particles. Opt. Lett. 1986, 11, 288–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zaltron, A.; Merano, M.; Mistura, G.; Sada, C.; Seno, F. Optical Tweezers in Single-Molecule Experiments. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2020, 135, 896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ashkin, A.; Dziedzic, J.M. Optical Trapping and Manipulation of Viruses and Bacteria. Science 1987, 235, 1517–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ashkin, A.; Dziedzic, J.M.; Yamane, T. Optical Trapping and Manipulation of Single Cells Using Infrared Laser Beams. Nature 1987, 330, 769–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. de Oliveira, M.A.S.; Moura, D.S.; Fontes, A.; Araujo, R.E. de Damage Induced in Red Blood Cells by Infrared Optical Trapping: An Evaluation Based on Elasticity Measurements. J. Biomed. Opt. 2016, 21, 075012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ghanashyam, C.; Sachin, S.; Sanjay, B.; Santhosh, C.; Aseefhali, B. Optical Trapping and Micro-Raman Spectroscopy of Functional Red Blood Cells Using Vortex Beam for Cell Membrane Studies. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 5484–5493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Xin, H.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Li, B. Optical Forces: From Fundamental to Biological Applications. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2001994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Choudhary, D.; Mossa, A.; Jadhav, M.; Cecconi, C. Bio-Molecular Applications of Recent Developments in Optical Tweezers. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sokolenko, B.V.; Shostka, N.V.; Karakchieva, O.S. Optical Tweezers and Manipulators. Modern Concepts and Future Prospects. Успехи Физических Наук 2022, 192, 867–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Gieseler, J.; Gomez-Solano, J.R.; Magazzù, A.; Pérez Castillo, I.; Pérez García, L.; Gironella-Torrent, M.; Viader-Godoy, X.; Ritort, F.; Pesce, G.; Arzola, A.V.; et al. Optical Tweezers — from Calibration to Applications: A Tutorial. Adv. Opt. Photon. 2021, 13, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liu, Y.; Rao, H.; Zhang, H.; Wang, M.; Wu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Han, C.; Yan, C.; Zhang, L.; Chen, W.; et al. Efficient Characterization of Red Blood Cell Rheological Properties Using a Multichannel Microfluidic Chip and Optical Tweezers. Mater. Today Adv. 2024, 24, 100545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhu, R.; Avsievich, T.; Bykov, A.; Popov, A.; Meglinski, I. Influence of Pulsed He–Ne Laser Irradiation on the Red Blood Cell Interaction Studied by Optical Tweezers. Micromachines 2019, 10, 853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Brouhard, G.J.; Schek, H.T.; Hunt, A.J. Advanced Optical Tweezers for the Study of Cellular and Molecular Biomechanics. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2003, 50, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kim, H.; Lee, W.; Lee, H.; Jo, H.; Song, Y.; Ahn, J. In Situ Single-Atom Array Synthesis Using Dynamic Holographic Optical Tweezers. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Xie, X.; Wang, X.; Min, C.; Ma, H.; Yuan, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Bu, J.; Yuan, X. Single-Particle Trapping and Dynamic Manipulation with Holographic Optical Surface-Wave Tweezers. Photonics Res. 2022, 10, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Liu, S.; Qu, Z.; Zhao, X.; Wang, J.-L. Fast and Versatile Optical Force Measurement with Digitally Modulated Stimulus in Holographic Optical Tweezers. Opt. Laser Technol. 2023, 167, 109809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mao, Y.; Li, S.; Liu, R.; Zhang, C.; Tan, X.; Zhong, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, J. Optofluidic-Based Deformability Cytometry: Characterizing Erythrocyte Elasticity and Assessing Storage Quality. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2024, 369, 115182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Strasser, F.; Moser, S.; Ritsch-Marte, M.; Thalhammer, G. Direct Measurement of Individual Optical Forces in Ensembles of Trapped Particles. Optica 2021, 8, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pesen, T.; Akgun, B.; Unlu, M.B. Measuring the Effect of Repetitive Stretching on the Deformability of Human Red Blood Cells Using Optical Tweezers. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 9060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Liang, Y.; Liang, G.; Xiang, Y.; Lamstein, J.; Gautam, R.; Bezryadina, A.; Chen, Z. Manipulation and Assessment of Human Red Blood Cells with Tunable “Tug-of-War” Optical Tweezers. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2019, 12, 064060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kariuki, S.N.; Marin-Menendez, A.; Introini, V.; Ravenhill, B.J.; Lin, Y.-C.; Macharia, A.; Makale, J.; Tendwa, M.; Nyamu, W.; Kotar, J.; et al. Red Blood Cell Tension Protects against Severe Malaria in the Dantu Blood Group. Nature 2020, 585, 579–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Liu, R.; Shao, M.; Ke, Z.; Li, C.; Lu, F.; Zhong, M.-C.; Mao, Y.; Wei, X.; Zhong, Z.; Zhou, J. Measurement of Red Blood Cell Deformability during Morphological Changes Using Rotating-Glass-Plate-Based Scanning Optical Tweezers. Biomed. Opt. Express 2023, 14, 4979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tognato, R.; Jones, P.H. Ray Optics Model for Optical Trapping of Biconcave Red Blood Cells. Micromachines 2022, 14, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Huruta, R.R.; Barjas-Castro, M.L.; Saad, S.T.O.; Costa, F.F.; Fontes, A.; Barbosa, L.C.; Cesar, C.L. Mechanical Properties of Stored Red Blood Cells Using Optical Tweezers. Blood 1998, 92, 2975–2977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Sutera, S.; Gardner, R.; Boylan, C.; Carroll, G.; Chang, K.; Marvel, J.; Kilo, C.; Gonen, B.; Williamson, J. Age-Related Changes in Deformability of Human Erythrocytes. Blood 1985, 65, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Fontes, A.; Castro, M.L.B.; Brandão, M.M.; Fernandes, H.P.; Thomaz, A.A.; Huruta, R.R.; Pozzo, L.Y.; Barbosa, L.C.; Costa, F.F.; Saad, S.T.O.; et al. Mechanical and Electrical Properties of Red Blood Cells Using Optical Tweezers. J. Opt. 2011, 13, 044012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Silva, C.A.L.; Azevedo Filho, C.A.; Pereira, G.; Silva, D.C.N.; Castro, M.C.A.B.; Almeida, A.F.; Lucena, S.C.A.; Santos, B.S.; Barjas-Castro, M.L.; Fontes, A. Vitamin E Nanoemulsion Activity on Stored Red Blood Cells. Transfus. Med. 2017, 27, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Brandão, M.M.; Fontes, A.; Barjas-Castro, M.L.; Barbosa, L.C.; Costa, F.F.; Cesar, C.L.; Saad, S.T.O. Optical Tweezers for Measuring Red Blood Cell Elasticity: Application to the Study of Drug Response in Sickle Cell Disease. Eur. J. Haematol. 2003, 70, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lima, C.N.; Moura, D.S.; Silva, Y.S.S.; Souza, T.H.; Crisafuli, F.A.P.; Silva, D.C.N.; Peres, J.C.; Cesar, C.L.; De Araujo, R.E.; Fontes, A. Evaluating Viscoelastic Properties and Membrane Electrical Charges of Red Blood Cells with Optical Tweezers and Cationic Quantum Dots – Applications to β-Thalassemia Intermedia Hemoglobinopathy. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2020, 186, 110671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Rancourt-Grenier, S.; Wei, M.-T.; Bai, J.-J.; Chiou, A.; Bareil, P.P.; Duval, P.-L.; Sheng, Y. Dynamic Deformation of Red Blood Cell in Dual-Trap Optical Tweezers. Opt. Express 2010, 18, 10462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Inanc, M.T.; Demirkan, I.; Ceylan, C.; Ozkan, A.; Gundogdu, O.; Goreke, U.; Gurkan, U.A.; Unlu, M.B. Quantifying the Influences of Radiation Therapy on Deformability of Human Red Blood Cells by Dual-Beam Optical Tweezers. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 15519–15527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Pesen, T.; Haydaroglu, M.; Capar, S.; Parlatan, U.; Unlu, M.B. Comparison of the Human’s and Camel’s Red Blood Cell Deformability by Optical Tweezers and Raman Spectroscopy. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2023, 35, 101490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Liu, J.; Zhang, F.; Zhu, L.; Chu, D.; Qu, X. Mechanical Properties of RBCs under Oxidative Stress Measured by Optical Tweezers. Opt. Commun. 2019, 442, 56–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Lukose, J.; N, M.; Mohan, G.; Shastry, S.; Chidangil, S. Optical Tweezers Combined with micro-Raman Investigation of Alcohol-induced Changes on Single, Live Red Blood Cells in Blood Plasma. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2019, 50, 1367–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rao, H.; Wang, M.; Wu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Han, C.; Yan, C.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y. In Vitro Investigation of the Mechanics of Fixed Red Blood Cells Based on Optical Trap Micromanipulation and Image Analysis. Biomed. Opt. Express 2024, 15, 3783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hénon, S.; Lenormand, G.; Richert, A.; Gallet, F. A New Determination of the Shear Modulus of the Human Erythrocyte Membrane Using Optical Tweezers. Biophys. J. 1999, 76, 1145–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sleep, J.; Wilson, D.; Simmons, R.; Gratzer, W. Elasticity of the Red Cell Membrane and Its Relation to Hemolytic Disorders: An Optical Tweezers Study. Biophys. J. 1999, 77, 3085–3095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Mills, J.P.; Qie, L.; Dao, M.; Lim, C.T.; Suresh, S. Nonlinear Elastic and Viscoelastic Deformation of the Human Red Blood Cell with Optical Tweezers. Mol. Cell. Biomech. 2004, 1, 169–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wu, J.; Li, Y.; Lu, D.; Liu, Z.; Cheng, Z.; He, L. Measurement of the Membrane Elasticity of Red Blood Cell with Osmotic Pressure by Optical Tweezers. Cryo Lett. 2009, 30, 89–95. [Google Scholar]
  94. Wojdyla, M.; Raj, S.; Petrov, D. Nonequilibrium Fluctuations of Mechanically Stretched Single Red Blood Cells Detected by Optical Tweezers. Eur. Biophys. J. 2013, 42, 539–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Liu, J.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, F.; Dong, M.; Qu, X. Microdeformation of RBCs under Oxidative Stress Measured by Digital Holographic Microscopy and Optical Tweezers. Appl. Opt. 2019, 58, 4042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Hu, S.; Ye, J.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, C. Advanced Optical Tweezers on Cell Manipulation and Analysis. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2022, 137, 1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Parker, K.H.; Winlove, C.P. The Deformation of Spherical Vesicles with Permeable, Constant-Area Membranes: Application to the Red Blood Cell. Biophys. J. 1999, 77, 3096–3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Fontes, A.; Fernandes, H.P.; De Thomaz, A.A.; Barbosa, L.C.; Barjas-Castro, M.L.; Cesar, C.L. Measuring Electrical and Mechanical Properties of Red Blood Cells with Double Optical Tweezers. J. Biomed. Opt. 2008, 13, 014001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Steffen, P.; Jung, A.; Nguyen, D.B.; Müller, T.; Bernhardt, I.; Kaestner, L.; Wagner, C. Stimulation of Human Red Blood Cells Leads to Ca2+-Mediated Intercellular Adhesion. Cell Calcium 2011, 50, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Lin, C.-L.; Wang, S.-G.; Tien, M.-T.; Chiang, C.-H.; Lee, Y.-C.; Baldeck, P.L.; Shin, C.-S. A Novel Methodology for Detecting Variations in Cell Surface Antigens Using Cell-Tearing by Optical Tweezers. Biosensors 2022, 12, 656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kals, E.; Kals, M.; Lees, R.A.; Introini, V.; Kemp, A.; Silvester, E.; Collins, C.R.; Umrekar, T.; Kotar, J.; Cicuta, P.; et al. Application of Optical Tweezer Technology Reveals That PfEBA and PfRH Ligands, Not PfMSP1, Play a Central Role in Plasmodium Falciparum Merozoite-Erythrocyte Attachment. PLoS Pathog. 2024, 20, e1012041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Avsievich, T.; Popov, A.; Bykov, A.; Meglinski, I. Mutual Interaction of Red Blood Cells Influenced by Nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ermolinskiy, P.; Lugovtsov, A.; Yaya, F.; Lee, K.; Kaestner, L.; Wagner, C.; Priezzhev, A. Effect of Red Blood Cell Aging in Vivo on Their Aggregation Properties in Vitro: Measurements with Laser Tweezers. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Semenov, A.N.; Lugovtsov, A.E.; Shirshin, E.A.; Yakimov, B.P.; Ermolinskiy, P.B.; Bikmulina, P.Y.; Kudryavtsev, D.S.; Timashev, P.S.; Muravyov, A.V.; Wagner, C.; et al. Assessment of Fibrinogen Macromolecules Interaction with Red Blood Cells Membrane by Means of Laser Aggregometry, Flow Cytometry, and Optical Tweezers Combined with Microfluidics. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Maksimov, M.K.; Ermolinskiy, P.B.; Scheglovitova, O.N.; Sklyankina, N.N.; Muravyov, A.V.; Lugovtsov, A.E.; Priezzhev, A.V. RBC Aggregation, Deformation and Adhesion to Endothelium: Role of Nitric Oxide Derived from L-Arginine and Sodium Nitroprusside. J. Innov. Opt. Health Sci. 2024, 17, 2440001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ahlawat, S.; Kumar, N.; Uppal, A.; Kumar Gupta, P. Visible Raman Excitation Laser Induced Power and Exposure Dependent Effects in Red Blood Cells. J. Biophotonics 2017, 10, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Zhu, R.; Avsievich, T.; Su, X.; Bykov, A.; Popov, A.; Meglinski, I. Hemorheological Alterations of Red Blood Cells Induced by 450-Nm and 520-Nm Laser Radiation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2022, 230, 112438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Lukose, J.; Shastry, S.; Mithun, N.; Mohan, G.; Ahmed, A.; Chidangil, S. Red Blood Cells under Varying Extracellular Tonicity Conditions: An Optical Tweezers Combined with Micro-Raman Study. Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express 2020, 6, 015036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Lukose, J.; N., M.; M., P.; Mohan, G.; Shastry, S.; Chidangil, S. Laser Raman Tweezer Spectroscopy to Explore the Bisphenol A-Induced Changes in Human Erythrocytes. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 15933–15940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Avsievich, T.; Zhu, R.; Popov, A.P.; Yatskovskiy, A.; Popov, A.A.; Tikhonowsky, G.; Pastukhov, A.I.; Klimentov, S.; Bykov, A.; Kabashin, A.; et al. Impact of Plasmonic Nanoparticles on Poikilocytosis and Microrheological Properties of Erythrocytes. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Barkur, S.; Lukose, J.; Chidangil, S. Probing Nanoparticle–Cell Interaction Using Micro-Raman Spectroscopy: Silver and Gold Nanoparticle-Induced Stress Effects on Optically Trapped Live Red Blood Cells. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 1439–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Jia, W.; Chen, P.; Chen, W.; Li, Y. Raman Characterizations of Red Blood Cells with β-Thalassemia Using Laser Tweezers Raman Spectroscopy. Medicine 2018, 97, e12611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Malekmohammadi, M.; Akhlaghi, E.A.; Soltani, J.; Hajizadeh, F. Escape Velocity Sorting in Optical Tweezers System Using a Home-Made Piezo Mirror. J. Opt. 2020, 22, 055301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Maslianitsyna, A.; Ermolinskiy, P.; Lugovtsov, A.; Pigurenko, A.; Sasonko, M.; Gurfinkel, Y.; Priezzhev, A. Multimodal Diagnostics of Microrheologic Alterations in Blood of Coronary Heart Disease and Diabetic Patients. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. De Luca, A.C.; Rusciano, G.; Ciancia, R.; Martinelli, V.; Pesce, G.; Rotoli, B.; Selvaggi, L.; Sasso, A. Spectroscopical and Mechanical Characterization of Normal and Thalassemic Red Blood Cells by Raman Tweezers. Opt. Express 2008, 16, 7943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Mohi, S.M.; Saadon, H.L.; Khalaf, A.A. Single Laser Trapping for Optical Folding and Rotation of Red Blood Cells in Sickle Cell Disease in Response to Hydroxyurea Treatment. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2021, 554, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Liu, R.; Mao, Z.; Matthews, D.L.; Li, C.-S.; Chan, J.W.; Satake, N. Novel Single-Cell Functional Analysis of Red Blood Cells Using Laser Tweezers Raman Spectroscopy: Application for Sickle Cell Disease. Exp. Hematol. 2013, 41, 656–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Lima, C.; Matos, T.D.L.R.; Souza, T.H.S.; Amorim, M.S.N.; Santana, O.A.; Moura, P.; Moura, D.S.; Cabral Filho, P.E.; Alencar, L.M.R.; Fontes, A. Probing the Interaction of Mannose-Binding Lectin with Healthy and Sickle Cell Anemia Red Blood Cells and Its Role in Cellular Biomechanics. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 300, 140118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Fraczkowska, K.; Bacia, M.; Przybyło, M.; Drabik, D.; Kaczorowska, A.; Rybka, J.; Stefanko, E.; Drobczynski, S.; Masajada, J.; Podbielska, H.; et al. Alterations of Biomechanics in Cancer and Normal Cells Induced by Doxorubicin. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 97, 1195–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Soysal, K.B.; Parlatan, S.; Mastanzade, M.; Ozbalak, M.; Yenerel, M.N.; Unlu, M.B.; Basar, G.; Parlatan, U. Raman Tweezers as an Alternative Diagnostic Tool for Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria. Anal. Methods 2021, 13, 3963–3969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Sarmah, P.; Ghanashyam, C.; Khanna, R.; Bankapur, A. Unraveling Biochemical Differences in the Membrane of Functional RBCs and Elliptocytes Using Vortex Beam-Based Micro-Raman Spectroscopy. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2025, 334, 125911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Brandão, M.M.; Castro, M.D.L.R.B.; Fontes, A.; Cesar, C.L.; Costa, F.F.; Saad, S.T.O. Impaired Red Cell Deformability in Iron Deficient Subjects. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 2009, 43, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Eraky, M.T.; Abd El-Rahman, A.I.; Shazly, M.H.; Abdelrahman, M.M. Mechanics of Deformation of Malaria-Infected Red Blood Cells. Mech. Res. Commun. 2021, 113, 103666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Crick, A.J.; Theron, M.; Tiffert, T.; Lew, V.L.; Cicuta, P.; Rayner, J.C. Quantitation of Malaria Parasite-Erythrocyte Cell-Cell Interactions Using Optical Tweezers. Biophys. J. 2014, 107, 846–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Ermolinskiy, P.; Lugovtsov, A.; Maslyanitsina, A.; Semenov, A.; Dyachuk, L.; Priezzhev, A. Interaction of Erythrocytes in the Process of Pair Aggregation in Blood Samples from Patients with Arterial Hypertension and Healthy Donors: Measurements with Laser Tweezers. J. Biomed. Photonics Eng. 2018, 4, 030303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Bravo, N.; Torres, J.; González-Ortiz, M.; Staforelli-Vivanco, J.P. Flickering of Fetal Erythrocytes Membrane under Gestational Diabetes Observed with Dual Time Resolved Membrane Fluctuation Spectroscopy. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2023, 36, 101556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Lin, J.; Shao, L.; Qiu, S.; Huang, X.; Liu, M.; Zheng, Z.; Lin, D.; Xu, Y.; Li, Z.; Lin, Y.; et al. Application of a Near-Infrared Laser Tweezers Raman Spectroscopy System for Label-Free Analysis and Differentiation of Diabetic Red Blood Cells. Biomed. Opt. Express 2018, 9, 984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Singh, Y.; Chowdhury, A.; Dasgupta, R.; Majumder, S.K. The Effects of Short Term Hyperglycemia on Human Red Blood Cells Studied Using Raman Spectroscopy and Optical Trap. Eur. Biophys. J. 2021, 50, 867–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Singh, Y.; Chowdhury, A.; Dasgupta, R.; Majumder, S.K. The Effects of Lithium on Human Red Blood Cells Studied Using Optical Spectroscopy and Laser Trap. Eur. Biophys. J. 2023, 52, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Lukose, J.; N, M.; Mohan, G.; Shastry, S.; Chidangil, S. Normal Saline-Induced Deoxygenation of Red Blood Cells Probed by Optical Tweezers Combined with the Micro-Raman Technique. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 7878–7884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Mithun, N.; Jijo, L.; Ganesh, M.; Shamee, S.; Santhosh, C. Single Cell Spectroscopy of Red Blood Cells in Intravenous Crystalloid Fluids. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2021, 257, 119726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Mithun, N.; Jijo, L.; Shamee, S.; Ganesh, M.; Santhosh, C. Human Red Blood Cell Behaviour in Hydroxyethyl Starch: Probed by Single Cell Spectroscopy. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 31453–31462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Bernecker, C.; Lima, M.A.R.B.F.; Ciubotaru, C.D.; Schlenke, P.; Dorn, I.; Cojoc, D. Biomechanics of Ex Vivo-Generated Red Blood Cells Investigated by Optical Tweezers and Digital Holographic Microscopy. Cells 2021, 10, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Gómez, F.; Silva, L.S.; Araújo, G.R.D.S.; Frases, S.; Pinheiro, A.A.S.; Agero, U.; Pontes, B.; Viana, N.B. Effect of Cell Geometry in the Evaluation of Erythrocyte Viscoelastic Properties. Phys. Rev. E 2020, 101, 062403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Yao, Z.; Kwan, C.C.; Poon, A.W. An Optofluidic “Tweeze-and-Drag” Cell Stretcher in a Microfluidic Channel. Lab Chip 2020, 20, 601–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Dasgupta, R.; Shanker Verma, R.; Ahlawat, S.; Uppal, A.; Kumar Gupta, P. Studies on Erythrocytes in Malaria Infected Blood Sample with Raman Optical Tweezers. J. Biomed. Opt. 2011, 16, 077009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Liu, R.; Mao, Z.; Matthews, D.L.; Li, C.-S.; Chan, J.W.; Satake, N. Novel Single-Cell Functional Analysis of Red Blood Cells Using Laser Tweezers Raman Spectroscopy: Application for Sickle Cell Disease. Exp. Hematol. 2013, 41, 656–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Raj, S.; Marro, M.; Wojdyla, M.; Petrov, D. Mechanochemistry of Single Red Blood Cells Monitored Using Raman Tweezers. Biomed. Opt. Express 2012, 3, 753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Jayraj, S.; Sarmah, P.; Ghanashyam, C.; Bankapur, A. Light-Sheet Raman Tweezers for Whole-Cell Biochemical Analysis of Functional Red Blood Cells. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2024, 310, 123951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Mohanty, K.S.; Mohanty, S.K.; Monajembashi, S.; Greulich, K.O. Orientation of Erythrocytes in Optical Trap Revealed by Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2007, 12, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Wang, Y.; Dou, Y.; Xia, X.; Li, T.; Fan, H.; He, L.; Tan, X.; Lv, J.; Pan, T.; Zhou, J.; et al. Detection-Free High-Throughput Cell Sorting Using Fixed-Position Optical Tweezers. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2026, 447, 138824–138835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Harlepp, S.; Thalmann, F.; Follain, G.; Goetz, J.G. Hemodynamic Forces Can Be Accurately Measured in Vivo with Optical Tweezers. Mol. Biol. Cell 2017, 28, 3252–3260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Zhong, M.-C.; Wei, X.-B.; Zhou, J.-H.; Wang, Z.-Q.; Li, Y.-M. Trapping Red Blood Cells in Living Animals Using Optical Tweezers. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Lai, P.; Wang, L.; Tay, J.W.; Wang, L.V. Photoacoustically Guided Wavefront Shaping for Enhanced Optical Focusing in Scattering Media. Nat. Photon. 2015, 9, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Tian, W.; Xie, Y.; Su, H.; Zheng, C.; Li, M. Explainable Artificial Intelligence-Driven Salivary Exosome Spectroscopic Profiling for Clinical Diagnosis and Metastasis Detection of Oral Cancer. Nano Lett. 2026, 26, 2279–2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Ge, J.; Bai, C.; Chen, Z.; Fukuda, T.; Arai, T.; Liu, X. On-Chip Characterization of Cell Mechanics Assisted by External Physical Fields and Artificial Intelligence. Lab Chip 2026, 26, 1528–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Principle of optical tweezers. (a) After penetrating a particle, the incident light undergoes a change in momentum direction, exerting a reaction force on the particle. Fga and Fgb represent the gradient components of the optical force, while Fsa and Fsb denote the scattering components. Fa is the force exerted by light beam a on the particle, Fb is the force exerted by light beam b, and F is the combined force of both beams. (b) A focused Gaussian beam incident from below traps the particle at the focal point through the combined action of scattering and gradient forces [56].
Figure 1. Principle of optical tweezers. (a) After penetrating a particle, the incident light undergoes a change in momentum direction, exerting a reaction force on the particle. Fga and Fgb represent the gradient components of the optical force, while Fsa and Fsb denote the scattering components. Fa is the force exerted by light beam a on the particle, Fb is the force exerted by light beam b, and F is the combined force of both beams. (b) A focused Gaussian beam incident from below traps the particle at the focal point through the combined action of scattering and gradient forces [56].
Preprints 216994 g001
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of optical tweezer setups. (a) Conventional single-trap configuration [71]. (b) Conventional dual-trap configuration implemented using an AOD [65]. (c) Schematic illustration of a HOT setup [72]. The system consists of two main components: beam-shaping control and an inverted microscope.
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of optical tweezer setups. (a) Conventional single-trap configuration [71]. (b) Conventional dual-trap configuration implemented using an AOD [65]. (c) Schematic illustration of a HOT setup [72]. The system consists of two main components: beam-shaping control and an inverted microscope.
Preprints 216994 g002
Figure 3. (a) Schematic diagram of a single optical tweezers dragging an RBC, which is suspended in the sample chamber [59]. (b) Microscopic image of RBCs dragged at different speeds [80].
Figure 3. (a) Schematic diagram of a single optical tweezers dragging an RBC, which is suspended in the sample chamber [59]. (b) Microscopic image of RBCs dragged at different speeds [80].
Preprints 216994 g003
Figure 4. (a) Schematic of an RBC being trapped and stretched by dual optical tweezer [85]. (b) “Tug-of-war” optical tweezers setup for stretching an RBC, along with the corresponding optical intensity distribution [74]. (c) Bending of an RBC using three optical traps [46]. HOT can also achieve this operation. (d) The application of HOT. Direct fixation and stretching of an RBC with four optical traps. The colored arrows indicate the applied forces and the effective stretching force S [72].
Figure 4. (a) Schematic of an RBC being trapped and stretched by dual optical tweezer [85]. (b) “Tug-of-war” optical tweezers setup for stretching an RBC, along with the corresponding optical intensity distribution [74]. (c) Bending of an RBC using three optical traps [46]. HOT can also achieve this operation. (d) The application of HOT. Direct fixation and stretching of an RBC with four optical traps. The colored arrows indicate the applied forces and the effective stretching force S [72].
Preprints 216994 g004
Figure 5. Methods of indirect manipulation of RBCs using optical tweezers. (a) RBCs are indirectly stretched using dual OT with microbeads [90]. (b) Periodic triangular-wave or stepwise forces are applied to stretch RBCs [91]. (c) One microbead attached to an RBC is fixed onto the glass surface, while the other is trapped by OT; stretching is achieved by moving the microscope stage [92]. (d) The elastic stiffness of RBCs is measured using an indentation approach, where a microbead is pressed against the RBC surface [42].
Figure 5. Methods of indirect manipulation of RBCs using optical tweezers. (a) RBCs are indirectly stretched using dual OT with microbeads [90]. (b) Periodic triangular-wave or stepwise forces are applied to stretch RBCs [91]. (c) One microbead attached to an RBC is fixed onto the glass surface, while the other is trapped by OT; stretching is achieved by moving the microscope stage [92]. (d) The elastic stiffness of RBCs is measured using an indentation approach, where a microbead is pressed against the RBC surface [42].
Preprints 216994 g005
Figure 6. Recent multi-trap optical tweezer studies on RBC aggregation and adhesion. (a) Measurement of the aggregation force (FA) and disaggregation force (FD) of RBC doublets using dual optical traps [66]; the minimum force preventing aggregation was defined as FA, the constant force dragging the RBCs until the doublet separated was defined as FD. (b) Investigation of face-to-face adhesion and separation between two RBCs using four optical traps [99]. (c) Measurement of the binding force between RBCs and antibodies immobilized on glass substrates by pulling with OT: the RBC is lifted from the substrate, and the chamber is then moved at 5 μm/s and the trapping power is reduced from 250 mW to 5~10 mW to evaluate RBC-antibody binding strength [100]. (d) Measurement of the adhesion force between RBCs and malaria parasites using OT [101].
Figure 6. Recent multi-trap optical tweezer studies on RBC aggregation and adhesion. (a) Measurement of the aggregation force (FA) and disaggregation force (FD) of RBC doublets using dual optical traps [66]; the minimum force preventing aggregation was defined as FA, the constant force dragging the RBCs until the doublet separated was defined as FD. (b) Investigation of face-to-face adhesion and separation between two RBCs using four optical traps [99]. (c) Measurement of the binding force between RBCs and antibodies immobilized on glass substrates by pulling with OT: the RBC is lifted from the substrate, and the chamber is then moved at 5 μm/s and the trapping power is reduced from 250 mW to 5~10 mW to evaluate RBC-antibody binding strength [100]. (d) Measurement of the adhesion force between RBCs and malaria parasites using OT [101].
Preprints 216994 g006
Figure 7. Studies on RBC bio-related information using optical tweezers. (a) A multiple optical trapping was used to investigate the effect of a GPIIbIIIa inhibitor on RBC aggregation properties. The results showed that the inhibitor significantly reduced the aggregation force [104]. (b) Dual optical tweezers were employed to investigate the differential regulation of aggregation by various molecules, including autologous serum, autologous plasma, and phosphate-buffered saline solutions containing various macromolecules—Fib: fibrinogen; HSA: human serum albumin; γ-gl: γ-globulin from human serum; Dex500: 500 kDa dextran [16]. (c) The influence of L-arginine concentration on RBC aggregation was quantitatively measured by OT [105]. (d) Using multiple optical trapping, the aggregation forces of RBCs with different lifespans (corresponding to density fractions) were determined—where the youngest cells were positioned at the top and the oldest at the bottom. In autologous serum, the aggregation force increased progressively with cell age [89].
Figure 7. Studies on RBC bio-related information using optical tweezers. (a) A multiple optical trapping was used to investigate the effect of a GPIIbIIIa inhibitor on RBC aggregation properties. The results showed that the inhibitor significantly reduced the aggregation force [104]. (b) Dual optical tweezers were employed to investigate the differential regulation of aggregation by various molecules, including autologous serum, autologous plasma, and phosphate-buffered saline solutions containing various macromolecules—Fib: fibrinogen; HSA: human serum albumin; γ-gl: γ-globulin from human serum; Dex500: 500 kDa dextran [16]. (c) The influence of L-arginine concentration on RBC aggregation was quantitatively measured by OT [105]. (d) Using multiple optical trapping, the aggregation forces of RBCs with different lifespans (corresponding to density fractions) were determined—where the youngest cells were positioned at the top and the oldest at the bottom. In autologous serum, the aggregation force increased progressively with cell age [89].
Preprints 216994 g007
Figure 8. Studies on the effects of external stimuli on RBC mechanics using optical tweezers. (a) Dual optical traps were employed to directly stretch and compress RBCs, enabling analysis of their deformability in hypotonic (hypo), isotonic (iso), and hypertonic (hyper) solutions [74]. (b) LTRS was used to study how bisphenol A with different concentrations affects Raman peaks associated with hemoglobin [109]. (c) OT was used to investigate changes in RBC aggregation behavior after co-culture with various nanoparticles, including Ag (silver), Au (gold), TiN (titanium nitride), ZrN (zirconium nitride), and NP (nanoparticles) [110]. (d) By repeatedly stretching RBCs with OT, the DI of the mechanical fatigue response was obtained [73].
Figure 8. Studies on the effects of external stimuli on RBC mechanics using optical tweezers. (a) Dual optical traps were employed to directly stretch and compress RBCs, enabling analysis of their deformability in hypotonic (hypo), isotonic (iso), and hypertonic (hyper) solutions [74]. (b) LTRS was used to study how bisphenol A with different concentrations affects Raman peaks associated with hemoglobin [109]. (c) OT was used to investigate changes in RBC aggregation behavior after co-culture with various nanoparticles, including Ag (silver), Au (gold), TiN (titanium nitride), ZrN (zirconium nitride), and NP (nanoparticles) [110]. (d) By repeatedly stretching RBCs with OT, the DI of the mechanical fatigue response was obtained [73].
Preprints 216994 g008
Figure 9. The mechanical properties of RBCs under different disease conditions. (a) Apparent elasticity (μ) and membrane viscosity (ηm) of RBCs from β-thalassemia intermedia patients were measured using OT. β-thalassemia is characterized by insufficient production of the hemoglobin Beta (Hbβ). The main hemoglobin in healthy individuals is hemoglobin A (HbA) [83]. (b) Single-beam OT was employed to investigate the elastic behavior of RBCs from patients with sickle cell disease (HbSS), sickle cell trait (HbAS), and hydroxyurea-treated patients (HbSS/HU) [82]. (c) OT was used to stretch a “RBC-Plasmodium-RBC” aggregate to explore adhesion forces between merozoite-stage parasites lacking specific proteins and host RBCs [101]. (d) Aggregation time (Tagg) of RBCs was examined for patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and those with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [114].
Figure 9. The mechanical properties of RBCs under different disease conditions. (a) Apparent elasticity (μ) and membrane viscosity (ηm) of RBCs from β-thalassemia intermedia patients were measured using OT. β-thalassemia is characterized by insufficient production of the hemoglobin Beta (Hbβ). The main hemoglobin in healthy individuals is hemoglobin A (HbA) [83]. (b) Single-beam OT was employed to investigate the elastic behavior of RBCs from patients with sickle cell disease (HbSS), sickle cell trait (HbAS), and hydroxyurea-treated patients (HbSS/HU) [82]. (c) OT was used to stretch a “RBC-Plasmodium-RBC” aggregate to explore adhesion forces between merozoite-stage parasites lacking specific proteins and host RBCs [101]. (d) Aggregation time (Tagg) of RBCs was examined for patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and those with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [114].
Preprints 216994 g009
Figure 10. The combined application of optical tweezers with Raman spectroscopy technology, fluorescence spectroscopy technology and microfluidic technology. (a) Schematic diagram of a setup where Raman spectral information from RBCs was simultaneously obtained during optical trapping [117]. (b) A tether was pulled from an RBC using OT, after which the cell was chemically fixed and fluorescence-stained. Imaging revealed no significant F-actin fluorescence signal in the tether region [134]. (c) Schematic diagram of the device for measuring the deformation rate of rabbit RBCs by an optofluidic “tweeze-and-drag” cell stretching system [135].
Figure 10. The combined application of optical tweezers with Raman spectroscopy technology, fluorescence spectroscopy technology and microfluidic technology. (a) Schematic diagram of a setup where Raman spectral information from RBCs was simultaneously obtained during optical trapping [117]. (b) A tether was pulled from an RBC using OT, after which the cell was chemically fixed and fluorescence-stained. Imaging revealed no significant F-actin fluorescence signal in the tether region [134]. (c) Schematic diagram of the device for measuring the deformation rate of rabbit RBCs by an optofluidic “tweeze-and-drag” cell stretching system [135].
Preprints 216994 g010
Table 1. Summary of measurement contents, advantages, limitations and challenges of various techniques for measuring mechanical properties of red blood cells.
Table 1. Summary of measurement contents, advantages, limitations and challenges of various techniques for measuring mechanical properties of red blood cells.
Technique Measurements Main advantages Limitations and challenges References
Micropore
filtration
Deformability. Simple operation; capability for batch measurements. Low sensitivity; unable to quantitatively measure information from diseased subpopulations of RBCs. [7,12,13]
Laser diffractometry Deformability. Capability for batch measurements; rapid and simple; not affected by RBC aggregates or cell size variations. Only measures population-average deformability, thereby losing quantitative information about diseased subpopulations of RBCs. [14,15,16]
Microfluidic
techniques
Deformability;
relaxation time.
High throughput; small footprint; low sample consumption; supports both population-based and single-cell measurements. Requires precise image processing; no access to RBC force data; needs integration, portability, and improved fabrication techniques. [17,18,19]
Dielectrophoresis Deformability;
relaxation time; membrane shear modulus.
Integrable with microfluidics; relatively high throughput; label-free; no physical contact. Difficult to precisely calibrate force magnitude and distribution; results affected by cell electrical properties; lacks a universal or clear mechanical model. [20,21,22]
Micropipette
aspiration
Membrane shear modulus; membrane bending modulus. Accurate measurement of individual RBC membrane mechanical parameters. Time-consuming; low throughput; requires specialized equipment and trained personnel; potential cell damage during deformation. [23,24,25]
Atomic force
microscopy
Young's modulus; adhesion force; membrane topography imaging. Extremely high sensitivity; precise measurement of individual cell membrane mechanical parameters. Low throughput; only provides local membrane mechanical information; requires automation. [9,26,27]
Brillouin microscopy Elastic modulus. Non-contact; label-free; high-resolution 3D elastic modulus imaging. High requirements for sample preparation; expensive equipment; complicated equipment adjustment; weak signal. [28,29,30]
Magnetic twisting
cytometry
Dynamic modulus (membrane
stiffness and loss modulus).
High throughput; minimal photothermal damage. Low sensitivity; limited operational flexibility; non-uniform magnetic field and stress distribution; complex sample preparation. [8,31,32]
Optical
tweezers
Deformability;
relaxation time; membrane shear modulus; elastic modulus.
Extremely high force sensitivity; single-cell sorting and measurement; non-contact; label-free. Requires specialized equipment and trained personnel; risk of photodamage; low throughput. [10,33,34]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated