Submitted:
02 June 2026
Posted:
03 June 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Six lactic acid bacteria isolated from São Jorge PDO cheese were characterised for technological, safety, antimicrobial, and probiotic properties. All isolates fermented a broad range of carbohydrates and lacked lipolytic activity, while SJC115 and SJC119 showed proteolysis. Safety profiling revealed γ‑haemolysis, no DNase or gelatinase activity, and generally favourable antibiotic susceptibility, although tetracycline resistance in Lacticaseibacillus paracasei and Levilactobacillus brevis isolates warrants caution. L. paracasei and L. brevis isolates inhibited a wide range of foodborne pathogens (Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella enterica, Bacillus spp.) and spoilage fungi (Penicillium and Aspergillus spp.). Notably, two isolates (SJC117 and SJC120) exhibited antibacterial activity in neutralized cell-free supernatants, indicating bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances (BLIS). The isolates survived intestinal conditions above the probiotic threshold, yet only SJC117 and SJC120 tolerated gastric acidity (pH 2.5, 1 h) with >5 log CFU/mL. Despite low hydrophobicity, strains showed good autoaggregation and pathogen coaggregation. All isolates produced exopolysaccharides (EPS) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptides, whereas some exhibited moderate conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) production and glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) activity. L. paracasei SJC117 stood out by combining BLIS/antifungal activity, superior gastric tolerance, and an exceptional bioactive profile, making it a promising candidate for biopreservation and functional food applications.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Bacterial Isolation
2.2. Tecnological Characterization
2.2.1. Acidification Capacity
2.2.2. Sugar Fermentation
2.2.3. Enzymatic Activity
2.2.4. Proteolytic Activity
2.2.5. Lipolytic Activity
2.3. Safety Evaluation
2.3.1. Haemolytic Activity
2.3.2. DNase Activity
2.3.3. Gelatinase Activity
2.3.4. Antibiotic Susceptibility
2.4 Antimicrobial Activity
2.4.1. Antimicrobial Activity
2.4.2. Antifungal Activity
2.5. Probiotic Evaluation
2.5.1. Gastrointestinal Resistance
2.5.2. Hydrophobicity
2.5.3. Autoaggregation
2.5.4. Coaggregation
2.5.5. Production of EPS
2.5.6. Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitory Activity
2.5.7. Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA) Production
2.5.8. GABA Production Capacity
3. Results
3.1. Technological Characterization
3.2. Safety Evaluation
3.3. Antimicrobial Activity
3.3. Probiotic Potential
3.3.1. Gastrointestinal Tolerance
3.3.2. Hydrophobicity

3.3.3. Autoaggregation and Coaggregation
3.3.4. EPS Production
3.3.5. ACE Inhibitory Activity
3.3.6. CLA Production
3.3.7. GAD Activity

4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| ACE | Angiotensin-converting enzyme |
| A. chevalieri | Aspergillus chevalieri |
| A. flavus | Aspergillus flavus |
| B. cereus | Bacillus cereus |
| BLIS | Bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances |
| B. spizizenii | Bacillus spizizenii |
| CFS | Cell-free supernatant |
| CFU | Colony-forming unit |
| CLA | Conjugated linoleic acid |
| E. coli | Escherichia coli |
| EPS | Exopolysaccharides |
| GAD | Glutamate decarboxylase |
| GABA | gamma-aminobutyric acid |
| LAB | Lactic acid bacteria |
| L. parabuchneri | Lentilactobacillus parabuchneri |
| L. paracasei | Lacticaseibacillus paracasei |
| L. brevis | Levilactobacillus brevis |
| L. innocua | Listeria innocua |
| L. monocytogenes | Listeria monocytogenes |
| MRS | De Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe |
| MSG | monosodium glutamate |
| NSLAB | Non starter lactic acid bacteria |
| OD | Optical density |
| P. aeruginosa | Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
| P. brevicompactum | Penicillium brevicompactum |
| P. commune | Penicilliumcommune |
| PCA | Plate Count Agar |
| PDO | Protected Designation of Origin |
| PLA | Phenyllactic acid |
| P. nordicum | Penicillium nordicum |
| QPS | Quality Presumption of Safety |
| S. aureus | Staphylococcus aureus |
| S. enterica | Salmonella enterica |
References
- Coelho, M.C.; Malcata, F.X.; Silva, C.C. Distinct bacterial communities in São Jorge cheese with protected designation of origin (PDO). Foods 2023, 12, 990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Neviani, E.; Gatti, M.; Gardini, F.; Levante, A. Microbiota of cheese ecosystems: A perspective on cheesemaking. Foods 2025, 14, 830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cirat, R.; Capozzi, V.; Benmechernene, Z.; Spano, G.; Grieco, F.; Fragasso, M. LAB antagonistic activities and their significance in food biotechnology: Molecular mechanisms, food targets, and other related traits of interest. Fermentation 2024, 10, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parada Fabián, J.C.; Álvarez Contreras, A.K.; Natividad Bonifacio, I.; Hernández Robles, M.F.; Vázquez Quiñones, C.R.; Quiñones Ramírez, E.I.; Vázquez Salinas, C. Toward safer and sustainable food preservation: A comprehensive review of bacteriocins in the food industry. Biosci. Rep. 2025, 45, 277–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coelho, M.C.; Malcata, F.X.; Silva, C.C. Lactic acid bacteria in raw-milk cheeses: From starter cultures to probiotic functions. Foods 2022, 11, 2276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maftei, N.-M.; Raileanu, C.R.; Balta, A.A.; Ambrose, L.; Boev, M.; Marin, D.B.; Lisa, E.L. The potential impact of probiotics on human health: an update on their health-promoting properties. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jurášková, D.; Ribeiro, S.C.; Silva, C.C. Exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria: from biosynthesis to health-promoting properties. Foods 2022, 11, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abedin, M.M.; Chourasia, R.; Phukon, L.C.; Sarkar, P.; Ray, R.C.; Singh, S.P.; Rai, A.K. Lactic acid bacteria in the functional food industry: Biotechnological properties and potential applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 64, 10730–10748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iorizzo, M.; Di Martino, C.; Letizia, F.; Crawford, T.W., Jr.; Paventi, G. Production of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) by Lactiplantibacillus plantarum: A review with emphasis on fermented foods. Foods 2024, 13, 975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, Y.; Miao, K.; Niyaphorn, S.; Qu, X. Production of gamma-aminobutyric acid from lactic acid bacteria: A systematic review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahali, A.; Soltani, R.; Akbari, V. Probiotic Lactobacillus and the potential risk of spreading antibiotic resistance: a systematic review. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2023, 18, 468–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coelho, M.C.; Ribeiro, S.C.; Malcata, F.X.; Silva, C.C. High gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) producing Enterococcus malodoratus isolated from protected denomination of origin (PDO) cheese. Int. Dairy J. 2025, 161, 106112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jurášková, D.; Pires, V.C.; Ribeiro, S.C.; Ferreira, S.S.; Bernardo, F.; Evtyugin, D.; Coimbra, M.A.; Silva, C.C. Exopolysaccharide (EPS)-producing Streptococcus thermophilus: functional and probiotic potential. Foods 2025, 14, 3013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hickey, D.K.; Kilcawley, K.N.; Beresford, T.P.; Wilkinson, M.G. Lipolysis in Cheddar Cheese Made from Raw, Thermized, and Pasteurized Milks. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Franciosi, E.; Settanni, L.; Cavazza, A.; Poznanski, E. Biodiversity and technological potential of wild lactic acid bacteria from raw cows' milk. Int. Dairy J. 2009, 19, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hantsis-Zacharov, E.; Halpern, M. Culturable psychrotrophic bacterial communities in raw milk and their proteolytic and lipolytic traits. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 7162–7168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Asteri, I.-A.; Robertson, N.; Kagkli, D.-M.; Andrewes, P.; Nychas, G.; Coolbear, T.; Holland, R.; Crow, V.; Tsakalidou, E. Technological and flavour potential of cultures isolated from traditional Greek cheeses–A pool of novel species and starters. Int. Dairy J. 2009, 19, 595–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, H.; Malik, R.K. Incidence of virulence in bacteriocin-producing enterococcal isolates. Le Lait 2007, 87, 587–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terzić-Vidojević, A.; Veljović, K.; Tolinački, M.; Nikolić, M.; Ostojić, M.; Topisirović, L. Characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from artisanal Zlatar cheeses produced at two different geographical location. Genetika 2009, 41, 117–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CLSI, C.a.L.S.I. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 26th ed. CLSI supplement M100S. 2016.
- Ribeiro, S.; Coelho, M.; Todorov, S.D.; Franco, B.D.G.d.M.; Dapkevicius, M.; Silva, C. Technological properties of bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria isolated from Pico cheese an artisanal cow's milk cheese. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 116, 573–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheong, E.Y.; Sandhu, A.; Jayabalan, J.; Le, T.T.K.; Nhiep, N.T.; Ho, H.T.M.; Zwielehner, J.; Bansal, N.; Turner, M.S. Isolation of lactic acid bacteria with antifungal activity against the common cheese spoilage mould Penicillium commune and their potential as biopreservatives in cheese. Food Control 2014, 46, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pires, V.; Ribeiro, S.C.; Silva, S.P.; Juraskova, D.; Silva, C.C. Probiotic, technological, and health-related characteristics of lactobacilli isolated from breast milk. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2023, 134, lxad122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Todorov, S.D.; Dicks, L.M. Evaluation of lactic acid bacteria from kefir, molasses and olive brine as possible probiotics based on physiological properties. Ann. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 661–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, T.; Wang, L.; Li, Q.; Long, Y.; Lin, Y.; Yin, J.; Zeng, Y.; Huang, L.; Yao, T.; Abbasi, M.N. Functional probiotics of lactic acid bacteria from Hu sheep milk. BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Smitinont, T.; Tansakul, C.; Tanasupawat, S.; Keeratipibul, S.; Navarini, L.; Bosco, M.; Cescutti, P. Exopolysaccharide-producing lactic acid bacteria strains from traditional Thai fermented foods: isolation, identification and exopolysaccharide characterization. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1999, 51, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cirrincione, S.; Breuer, Y.; Mangiapane, E.; Mazzoli, R.; Pessione, E. 'Ropy' phenotype, exopolysaccharides and metabolism: Study on food isolated potential probiotics LAB. Microbiol. Res. 2018, 214, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cushman, D.; Cheung, H. Spectrophotometric assay and properties of the angiotensin-converting enzyme of rabbit lung. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1971, 20, 1637–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribeiro, S.C.; Stanton, C.; Yang, B.; Ross, R.P.; Silva, C.C. Conjugated linoleic acid production and probiotic assessment of Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from Pico cheese. LWT 2018, 90, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos-Espinosa, A.; Beltrán-Barrientos, L.M.; Reyes-Díaz, R.; Mazorra-Manzano, M.Á.; Hernández-Mendoza, A.; González-Aguilar, G.A.; Sáyago-Ayerdi, S.G.; Vallejo-Cordoba, B.; González-Córdova, A.F. Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) production in milk fermented by specific wild lactic acid bacteria strains isolated from artisanal Mexican cheeses. Ann. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pripp, A.H.; Skeie, S.; Isaksson, T.; Borge, G.I.; Sørhaug, T. Multivariate modelling of relationships between proteolysis and sensory quality of Präst cheese. Int. Dairy J. 2006, 16, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kheadr, E.E.; Vuillemard, J.-C.; El Deeb, S.A. Accelerated Cheddar cheese ripening with encapsulated proteinases. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2000, 35, 483–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, Z.; Zhang, L.; Xin, L.; Lin, K.; Yi, H.; Han, X. Technological characterization of Lactobacillus in semihard artisanal goat cheeses from different Mediterranean areas for potential use as nonstarter lactic acid bacteria. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 2887–2896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McSweeney, P.L.; Sousa, M.J. Biochemical pathways for the production of flavour compounds in cheeses during ripening: A review. Le. Lait. 2000, 80, 293–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taeger, M.; Thiele, S. Additional costs of lactose-reduced diets: Lactose-free dairy product substitutes are a cost-effective alternative for people with lactose intolerance. Public Health Nutr. 2021, 24, 4043–4053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ardö, Y. Enzymes in Cheese Ripening. In Agents of Change: Enzymes in Milk and Dairy Products; Kelly, A.L., Larsen, L.B., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2021; pp. 363–395. [Google Scholar]
- Randazzo, C.L.; Liotta, L.; Angelis, M.D.; Celano, G.; Russo, N.; Hoorde, K.V.; Chiofalo, V.; Pino, A.; Caggia, C. Adjunct culture of non-starter lactic acid bacteria for the production of Provola Dei Nebrodi PDO cheese: in vitro screening and pilot-scale cheese-making. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farkye, N.; Yim, B. A preliminary study on the role of alkaline phosphatase in cheese ripening. Int. Dairy J. 2006, 16, 697–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braïek, O.B.; Morandi, S.; Cremonesi, P.; Smaoui, S.; Hani, K.; Ghrairi, T. Biotechnological potential, probiotic and safety properties of newly isolated enterocin-producing Enterococcus lactis strains. Lwt 2018, 92, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michlmayr, H.; Kneifel, W. β-Glucosidase activities of lactic acid bacteria: mechanisms, impact on fermented food and human health. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2014, 352, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huligere, S.S.; Kumari VB, C.; Desai, S.M.; Wong, L.S.; Firdose, N.; Ramu, R. Investigating the antidiabetic efficacy of dairy-derived Lacticaseibacillus paracasei probiotic strains: modulating α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzyme functions. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1288487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Paventi, G.; Di Martino, C.; Coppola, F.; Iorizzo, M. β-Glucosidase activity of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum: A key player in food fermentation and human health. Foods 2025, 14, 1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heavey, P.M.; Rowland, I.R. Gastrointestinal cancer. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2004, 18, 323–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Śliżewska, K.; Markowiak-Kopeć, P.; Śliżewska, W. The role of probiotics in cancer prevention. Cancers 2020, 13, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benigni, R.; Giuliani, A.; Franke, R.; Gruska, A. Quantitative structure− activity relationships of mutagenic and carcinogenic aromatic amines. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 3697–3714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haranahalli Nataraj, B.; Behare, P.V.; Yadav, H.; Srivastava, A.K. Emerging pre-clinical safety assessments for potential probiotic strains: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 64, 8155–8183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Das, D.J.; Shankar, A.; Johnson, J.B.; Thomas, S. Critical insights into antibiotic resistance transferability in probiotic Lactobacillus. Nutrition 2020, 69, 110567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, F.; Sun, Y.; Mi, Y.; Liang, C.; Yue, M.; Zhang, K.; Dong, R.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, Q.; Guo, S. Integrative metabolomic and genomic characterization of the high antimicrobial activity of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei and its potential for juice preservation. Food Res. Int. 2026, 119217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cleveland, J.; Montville, T.J.; Nes, I.F.; Chikindas, M.L. Bacteriocins: safe, natural antimicrobials for food preservation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2001, 71, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, R. Mycotoxins in food: Occurrence, health implications, and control strategies-A comprehensive review. Toxicon 2024, 248, 108038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sehar, N.; Pino, R.; Pellegrino, M.; Loizzo, M.R. Lactic Acid Bacteria for Fungal Control and Shelf-Life Extension in Fresh Pasta: Mechanistic Insights and Clean-Label Strategies. Molecules 2026, 31, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castro-López, C.; Romero-Luna, H.E.; García, H.S.; Vallejo-Cordoba, B.; González-Córdova, A.F.; Hernández-Mendoza, A. Key stress response mechanisms of probiotics during their journey through the digestive system: a review. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2023, 15, 1250–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Binda, S.; Hill, C.; Johansen, E.; Obis, D.; Pot, B.; Sanders, M.E.; Tremblay, A.; Ouwehand, A.C. Criteria to qualify microorganisms as “probiotic” in foods and dietary supplements. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Adams, M.C. In vitro assessment of the upper gastrointestinal tolerance of potential probiotic dairy propionibacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 91, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phùng, T.T.T.; Dupont, S.; Beney, L.; Chanut, J.; Karbowiak, T. Unlocking probiotic potential: physicochemical approaches to evaluate probiotic bacterial adhesion potential to the intestinal tract. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2025, 69, e202400705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Jo, J.; Wan, J.; Seo, H.; Han, S.-W.; Shin, Y.-J.; Kim, D.-H. In vitro evaluation of probiotic properties and anti-pathogenic effects of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains as potential probiotics. Foods 2024, 13, 2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouarabi, L.; Ouarabi, L.; Hamma-Faradji, S.; Mohedano, M.L.; López, P.; Drider, D. Exopolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria: Structure, biosynthesis, and health benefits. Microbes Infect. 2025, 105581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guzmán-Rodríguez, F.; Gómez-Ruiz, L.; Cruz-Guerrero, A. Antithrombotic and ACE-inhibitory activity of milk fermented by Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG and Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 59, 9417–9424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasrollahzadeh, A.; Tavani, S.M.; Arjeh, E.; Jafari, S.M. Production of conjugated linoleic acid by lactic acid bacteria; important factors and optimum conditions. Food Chem. X 2023, 20, 100942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jena, R.; Choudhury, P.K. Lactic acid bacteria in fermented dairy foods: Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) production and its therapeutic implications. Food Biosci. 2024, 62, 105276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

| Group | Antibiotic* | L. parabuchneri | L. paracasei | L. brevis | |||
| SJC114 | SJC115 | SJC116 | SJC117 | SJC119 | SJC120 | ||
| Penicillins | Ampicillin | S | S | S | S | R | S |
| Oxacillin | R | R | R | R | R | R | |
| Glycopeptides | Vancomycin | S | S | R | I | R | I |
| Tetracyclines | Tetracycline | S | R | R | R | R | R |
| Phenicols | Chloramphenicol | S | S | S | S | R | S |
| Aminoglycosides | Streptomycin | S | R | I | S | I | S |
| Kanamycin | S | R | R | I | I | I | |
| Target strains | L. parabuchneri | L. paracasei | L. brevis | ||||||||
| SJC114 | SJC115 | SJC116 | SJC117 | SJC119 | SJC120 | ||||||
| CFS | CFS | NS | CFS | NS | CFS | NS | CFS | NS | CFS | NS | |
| L. innocua ATCC 33090 | 0 | 10.1±0.4 | 0 | 10.4±0.1 | 0 | 5.3±7.4 | 0 | 9.6±1.0 | 0 | 9.2±0.1 | 0 |
| L. monocytogenes ATCC 35152 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.1±0.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.8±6.7 | 0 |
| L. monocytogenes ATCC 13932 | 0 | 11.2±1.1 | 0 | 10.2±0.5 | 0 | 10.5±0.7 | 5.2±4.2 | 9.5±0.7 | 0 | 10.5±0.1 | 5.6±7.9 |
| E. coli ATCC 15922 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.5±7.8 | 0 | 5.0±7.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.2±7.4 | 0 |
| E. coli ATCC 8739 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9.9±1.1 | 0 | 4.9±7.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9.2±0.9 | 0 |
| E. coli ATCC 25922 | 0 | 5.3±7.5 | 0 | 10.6±0.1 | 0 | 5.3±7.5 | 6.3±8.9 | 4.5±6.3 | 0 | 10.4±0.9 | 0 |
| S. aureus ATCC 25923 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.9±8.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 | 0 | 7.8±0.2 | 0 | 9.3±0.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.4±0.6 | 0 | 7.9±0.3 | 0 |
| S. Enteritis ATCC 13076 | 0 | 10.5±0.1 | 0 | 11.2±0.9 | 0 | 9.6±0.6 | 0 | 8.9±0.3 | 0 | 10.2±0.1 | 0 |
| S. Typhimurium ATCC 14028 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.3±0.8 | 0 | 9.2±0.8 | 0 | 9.7±0.4 | 0 | 6.2±6.1 | 0 |
| B. spizizenii ATCC 6333 | 0 | 10.5±0.3 | 0 | 11.8±0.3 | 0 | 10.4±0.6 | 9.1±0.2 | 10.8±0.5 | 0 | 10.9±0.1 | 0 |
| B. cereus ATCC 11778 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9.6±0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9.2±0.1 | 0 |
| Penicillium1 | Aspergillus1 | |||||
| LAB isolates | P. commune | P. brevicompactum | P. nordicum | A. chevalieri | A. flavus | |
| L. parabuchneri | ||||||
| SJC114 | +/- | +++ | +++ | +++ | +/- | |
| L. paracasei | ||||||
| SJC115 | + | +++ | +++ | +++ | + | |
| SJC116 | ++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | |
| SJC117 | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | |
| L. brevis | ||||||
| SJC119 | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | |
| SJC120 | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | |
| LAB isolates | Auto- aggregation (%) | Coaggregation (%) | |||
| E. coli | L. monocytogenes | S. aureus | S. Typhimurium | ||
| L. parabuchneri | |||||
| SJC114 | 7.28 ± 0.06 | 38.06 ± 0.01 | 28.08 ± 0.01 | 30.84 ± 0.02 | 39.80 ± 0.01 |
| L. paracasei | |||||
| SJC115 | 32.77 ± 0.08 | 27.42 ± 0.02 | 31.80 ± 0.03 | 27.42 ± 0.02 | 31.73 ± 0.02 |
| SJC116 | 10.17 ± 0.02 | 40.73 ± 0.01 | 34.02 ± 0.01 | 35.09 ± 0.02 | 38.88 ± 0.02 |
| SJC117 | 0 ± 0 | 31.72 ± 0.03 | 31.89 ± 0.01 | 31.72 ± 0.03 | 32.60 ± 0.02 |
| L. brevis | |||||
| SJC119 | 0 ± 0 | 27.85 ± 0.01 | 26.73 ± 0.01 | 27.85 ± 0.01 | 39.69 ± 0.00 |
| SJC120 | 2.39 ± 0.05 | 34.48 ± 0.02 | 36.73 ± 0.07 | 34.48 ± 0.02 | 40.46 ± 0.01 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.