Submitted:
12 May 2026
Posted:
12 May 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods



| Name of components | Content | ||
| Absolute, % | Relative, % | ||
| Forms of zinc occurrence | |||
| - Oxidized | 0.21 | 37.53 | |
| - Sulfides | 0.07 | 12.61 | |
| - Refractory (poorly soluble) | 0.28 | 49.86 | |
| Total | 0.56 | 100.0 | |
| Forms of lead occurrence | |||
| - Oxygen-containing | 0.39 | 66.58 | |
| - Galena | 0.09 | 16.05 | |
| - Residual forms | 0.10 | 17.37 | |
| Total | 0.58 | 100.0 | |
| Forms of iron occurrence | |||
| - Sulfides | <0.04 | - | |
| - Ferrous iron Fe²⁺ | 4.49 | 49.77 | |
| - Ferric iron Fe3+ | 4.53 | 50.23 | |
| Total | 9.02 | 100.0 | |
3. Results


Kinetics of Flotation
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Abkhoshk, E.; Jorjani, E.; Al-Harahsheh, M.S.; Rashchi, F.; Naazeri, M. Review of the hydrometallurgical processing of non-sulfide zinc ores. Hydrometallurgy 2014, 149, 153–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nayak, A.; Jena, M.S.; Mandre, N.R. Beneficiation of Lead–Zinc Ores—A Review. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2022, 43, 564–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Sun, Y.; Han, Y. Efficient flotation separation of lead–zinc oxide ores: A review. Green. Smart Min. Eng. 2024, 1, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, J.; Qu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, C.; Bu, X. Sulfide flotation of cerussite using novel reagents. Miner. Eng. 2023, 198, 108087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, A.; Ding, Z.; Yuan, J.; Feng, Q.; Wen, S.; Bai, S. Process mineralogy and flotation optimization of oxidized Pb–Zn ore. Minerals 2023, 13, 1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, Y.; Wang, B.; Gerson, A. The effect of electrochemical potential on flotation. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2012, 102–103, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, J.D.; Wan, R.Y.; He, Y. Surface chemistry and flotation of oxide minerals. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2005, 75, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finch, J.A.; Dobby, G.S. Column Flotation; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Ramazanova, R.A.; Seraya, N.V.; Bykov, R.A. Features of oxidized zinc ore processing. Metallurgist 2016, 60, 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Motovilov, I.Y.; Telkov, S.A.; Barmenshinova, M.B.; Omar, R.S.; Adilzhan, Z. Gravity–flotation beneficiation of oxidized lead–zinc ore. MIAB 2025, 9, 126–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mambetaliyeva, A.; Tussupbekova, T.; Sabirova, L.; Makasheva, G.; Rysbekov, K.; Barmenshinova, M. Study of oxidative–reductive potential changes in the enrichment of oxidized polymetallic ores. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 6091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, A.; Zhao, Z.; Jia, X.; Long, S.; Huo, G.; Chen, X. Alkaline leaching of zinc from hemimorphite ore. Hydrometallurgy 2009, 97, 228–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, Y.; Xie, S.; Chen, X.; Gui, W.; Yang, C.; Caccetta, L. Predictive model for iron precipitation. Hydrometallurgy 2015, 151, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lan, Z.Y.; Lai, Z.N.; Zheng, Y.X.; Lv, J.F.; Pang, J.; Ning, J.L. Recovery of Zn and Pb by sulfidation roasting–leaching. J. Cent. South Univ. 2020, 27, 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Önal, G.; Bulut, G.; Gül, A.; Kangal, O.; Perek, K.T.; Arslan, F. Flotation of oxide lead–zinc ores. Miner. Eng. 2005, 18, 279–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, C.A.; Peres, A.E.C. Reagents in flotation of zinc oxide ores. Miner. Eng. 2005, 18, 275–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Y.X.; Liu, W.; Qin, W.Q. Sulfidation roasting of lead and zinc carbonates. J. Cent. South Univ. 2015, 22, 1635–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Liu, S.; Liu, D.; Liu, R.; Liu, Z.; Jia, X.; Chang, T. Sulfidization mechanism of cerussite. Miner. Eng. 2020, 153, 106400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, K.; Feng, Q.; Zhang, G.; Shi, Q.; Luo, Y.; Li, C. Hemimorphite flotation mechanism. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2018, 25, 849–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, H.; Sun, R.; Wu, J.; Feng, D.; Gao, L. Sulfidization flotation of lead oxide ore. Minerals 2020, 10, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, R.; Pei, B.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Liu, D. Improved Understanding of the Sulfidization Mechanism in Amine Flotation of Smithsonite: An XPS, AFM and UV–Vis DRS Study. Minerals 2020, 10, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, Kai; Feng a, Qiming; Zhang, Guofan; Shi, Qing; Chang, Ziyong. Understanding the roles of Na2S and Pb(II)in the flotation of hemimorphite. Miner. Eng. 2017, Volume 111, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


| Dosage of S:CaO:H₂O, g/kg | Product | Yield, % | Grade, % | Recovery, % | ||
| Zn | Pb | Zn | Pb | |||
| Base experiment | ||||||
| 0 | Concentrate 1 | 3,18 | 0,69 | 0,98 | 3,90 | 5,39 |
| Concentrate 2 | 2,80 | 1,69 | 2,46 | 8,45 | 11,91 | |
| ∑ (Total) | 5,98 | 1,16 | 1,68 | 12,35 | 17,30 | |
| Tailings | 94,02 | 0,52 | 0,51 | 87,65 | 82,70 | |
| Feed (initial sample) | 100,00 | 0,56 | 0,58 | 100,0 | 100,0 | |
| Test 1 | ||||||
| Na2S - 500 g/t | Concentrate 1 | 2,89 | 1,50 | 7,18 | 7,75 | 35,73 |
| Concentrate 2 | 3,65 | 0,78 | 0,80 | 5,11 | 5,01 | |
| ∑ (Total) | 6,54 | 1,10 | 3,61 | 12,85 | 40,74 | |
| Tailings | 93,46 | 0,52 | 0,37 | 87,15 | 59,26 | |
| Feed (initial sample) | 100,0 | 0,56 | 0,58 | 100,0 | 100,0 | |
| Test 2 | ||||||
| 1:0.5:8.5 | Concentrate 1 | 5,43 | 4,74 | 4,27 | 45,94 | 40,02 |
| Concentrate 2 | 3,43 | 0,79 | 0,96 | 4,82 | 5,69 | |
| ∑ (Total) | 8,86 | 3,21 | 2,99 | 50,76 | 45,71 | |
| Tailings | 91,14 | 0,30 | 0,35 | 49,24 | 54,29 | |
| Feed (initial sample) | 100,0 | 0,56 | 0,58 | 100,0 | 100,0 | |
| Test 3 | ||||||
| 2:1:17 | Concentrate 1 | 9,70 | 2,87 | 3,61 | 49,66 | 60,39 |
| Concentrate 2 | 3,33 | 0,62 | 1,64 | 3,71 | 9,41 | |
| ∑ (Total) | 13,03 | 2,29 | 3,11 | 53,37 | 69,79 | |
| Tailings | 86,97 | 0,30 | 0,20 | 46,63 | 30,21 | |
| Feed (initial sample) | 100,0 | 0,56 | 0,58 | 100,0 | 100,0 | |
| Test 4 | ||||||
| 3:1.5:25.5 | Concentrate 1 | 12,14 | 2,34 | 2,84 | 50,82 | 59,41 |
| Concentrate 2 | 4,55 | 0,75 | 0,72 | 6,07 | 5,68 | |
| ∑ (Total) | 16,69 | 1,91 | 2,26 | 56,89 | 65,10 | |
| Tailings | 83,31 | 0,29 | 0,24 | 43,11 | 34,90 | |
| Feed (initial sample) | 100,0 | 0,56 | 0,58 | 100,0 | 100,0 | |
| Test 5 | ||||||
| 4:2:34 | Concentrate 1 | 7,88 | 3,38 | 4,16 | 47,60 | 56,52 |
| Concentrate 2 | 5,48 | 0,62 | 0,69 | 6,04 | 6,50 | |
| ∑ (Total) | 13,36 | 2,25 | 2,74 | 53,64 | 63,03 | |
| Tailings | 86,64 | 0,30 | 0,25 | 46,36 | 36,97 | |
| Feed (initial sample) | 100,0 | 0,56 | 0,58 | 100,0 | 100,0 | |
| Test 6 | ||||||
| 5:2,5:42,5 | Concentrate 1 | 8,78 | 2,99 | 3,54 | 46,91 | 53,68 |
| Concentrate 2 | 8,43 | 0,58 | 0,60 | 8,74 | 8,76 | |
| ∑ (Total) | 17,22 | 1,81 | 2,10 | 55,64 | 62,45 | |
| Tailings | 82,78 | 0,30 | 0,26 | 44,36 | 37,55 | |
| Feed (initial sample) | 100,0 | 0,56 | 0,58 | 100,0 | 100,0 | |
| Test 7 | ||||||
| 6:3:51 | Concentrate 1 | 15,29 | 1,45 | 1,82 | 39,57 | 47,90 |
| Concentrate 2 | 4,55 | 0,67 | 0,70 | 5,48 | 5,50 | |
| ∑ (Total) | 19,84 | 1,27 | 1,56 | 45,05 | 53,39 | |
| Tailings | 80,16 | 0,38 | 0,34 | 54,95 | 46,61 | |
| Feed (initial sample) | 100,0 | 0,56 | 0,58 | 100,0 | 100,0 | |
| Product | Yield, % | Content, % | Recovery, % | |||
| Zn | Pb | Zn | Pb | |||
| 1st fraction | 3.85 | 3.96 | 4.38 | 27.22 | 29.06 | |
| 2nd fraction | 2.56 | 3.34 | 4.24 | 15.29 | 18.71 | |
| 3rd fraction | 2.66 | 1.91 | 2.49 | 9.07 | 11.40 | |
| 4th fraction | 2.45 | 1.30 | 2.11 | 5.68 | 8.89 | |
| 5th fraction | 1.92 | 0.87 | 0.94 | 2.98 | 3.12 | |
| 6th fraction | 2.50 | 0.58 | 0.50 | 2.60 | 2.14 | |
| 7th fraction | 1.48 | 0.57 | 0.79 | 1.50 | 2.01 | |
| 8th fraction | 1.87 | 0.45 | 0.64 | 1.49 | 2.06 | |
| 9th fraction | 2.70 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 1.35 | 1.43 | |
| 10th fraction | 0.76 | 0.58 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 1.09 | |
| ∑1-10 fractions | 22.745 | 1.67 | 2.04 | 67.97 | 79.91 | |
| Tailings | 77.255 | 0.23 | 0.15 | 32.031 | 20.09 | |
| Feed (initial sample) | 100.0 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).