Submitted:
06 May 2026
Posted:
06 May 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Background
1.2. Problem Statement
1.3. Research Gap
1.4. Research Objective and Contributions
1.5. Paper Organization
2. Literature Review
2.1. Digital Twins in Smart Manufacturing
2.2. Digital Twins in Engineering Education
2.3. IoT Middleware and Node-RED in Industrial Applications
2.4. ERP Integration and SAP-Based Systems
2.5. AI-Based Decision Support in Manufacturing
2.6. Sustainability in Engineering Education
2.7. Research Gap Summary
- Lack of integrated Digital Twin frameworks combining simulation, IoT, ERP, and AI
- Limited availability of low-cost and accessible educational platforms
- Insufficient integration of enterprise systems (SAP/ERP) in teaching environments
- Limited focus on sustainability in Digital Twin-based education
3. Proposed Digital Twin Framework
3.1. Design Objectives
- Low Cost: Eliminate the need for expensive industrial hardware by relying on simulation tools and open or widely accessible platforms.
- Integration: Combine key Industry 4.0 components, including PLC simulation, IoT middleware, enterprise systems, and AI.
- Accessibility: Enable deployment in resource-constrained educational environments.
- Scalability: Allow extension to more complex manufacturing scenarios.
- Sustainability: Reduce physical resource usage, energy consumption, and infrastructure requirements.
3.2. Overall Architecture
- Simulation Layer
- Integration Layer
- Enterprise Layer
- Intelligence Layer
- Educational Layer
3.3. Framework Layers
3.3.1. Simulation Layer
3.3.2. Integration Layer (Node-RED)
- Real-time data acquisition
- API communication (REST/OData)
- Data transformation and routing
3.3.3. Enterprise Layer (SAP NetWeaver)
- Products
- Inventory levels
- Production transactions
3.3.4. Intelligence Layer (AI-Based Decision Support)
- Inventory replenishment
- Production adjustments
- Demand response
3.3.5. Educational Layer (Competency Mapping)
- Industrial automation
- IoT system integration
- ERP-based manufacturing processes
- AI-driven decision-making
3.4. Data Flow and System Interaction
- The Simulation Layer generates process data (e.g., machine status, production output).
- The Integration Layer (Node-RED) collects and transmits data to the Enterprise Layer.
- The Enterprise Layer (SAP) stores and processes data, updating inventory and production records.
- The Intelligence Layer analyzes data and generates decision recommendations.
- Decisions are sent back through the Integration Layer to update the simulation, completing the loop.
3.5. Framework Advantages
- Cost efficiency: Eliminates the need for physical manufacturing equipment
- Realism: Integrates industrial, enterprise, and AI components
- Flexibility: Supports different manufacturing scenarios
- Scalability: Can be extended to more complex systems
- Sustainability: Reduces energy and material consumption
3.6. Summary
4. System Implementation
5. Competency-Based Educational Mapping
6. Sustainability Assessment
7. Discussion
8. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Fuller, A.; Fan, Z.; Day, C.; Barlow, C. Digital Twin: Enabling Technologies, Challenges and Open Research. IEEE Access 2020, *8*, 108952–108971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasheed, A.; San, O.; Kvamsdal, T. Digital Twin: Values, Challenges and Enablers from a Modeling Perspective. IEEE Access 2020, *8*, 21980–22012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, D.; Snider, C.; Nassehi, A.; Yon, J.; Hicks, B. Characterising the Digital Twin: A Systematic Literature Review. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2020, 29, 36–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.; Liu, C.; Wang, K.; Huang, H.; Xu, X. Digital Twin-Driven Smart Manufacturing: Connotation, Reference Model, Applications and Research Issues. Comput. Ind. 2020, *120*, 103221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, F.; Qi, Q.; Liu, A.; Kusiak, A. Data-Driven Smart Manufacturing. J. Manuf. Syst. 2018, *48*, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagner, S.; Gonnermann, C.; Wegmann, M.; Listl, F.; Reinhart, G.; Weyrich, M. From Framework to Industrial Implementation: The Digital Twin in Process Planning. J. Intell. Manuf. 2024, 35, 3793–3813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kerrouchi, S.; Aghezzaf, E.-H.; Cottyn, J. Production Digital Twin: A Systematic Literature Review of Challenges. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2024, 37, 1168–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Webb, L.; Tokhi, O.M.; Alkan, B. Digital Twin-Enabled Smart Assembly Automation: State of the Art. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, Y.; Li, Z.; Wang, C. Research on data Mapping and Fusion in Digital Twin Manufacturing Systems. Meas. Control 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, T.; Li, Y.; Li, T.; et al. Machine learning in additive manufacturing: enhancing design, manufacturing and performance prediction intelligence. J. Intell. Manuf. 2026, 37, 711–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szántó, N.; Monek, G.D.; Fischer, S. Digital Twin-Supported Smart Educational Platform for Manufacturing Training. J. Eng. Manag. Syst. Eng. 2024, 3, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acker, J.; Rogers, I.; Guerra-Zubiaga, D.; Tanveer, M.H.; Moghadam, A. Low-Cost Digital Twin Approach in Engineering Education. Machines 2023, *11*, 860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javaid, M.; Haleem, A.; Suman, R. Digital Twin applications toward Industry 4.0: A Review. Cogn. Robot. 2023, Volume 3, Pages 71–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uhlemann, Thomas H.-J.; Schock, Christoph; Lehmann, Christian; Freiberger, Stefan; Steinhilper, Rolf. The Digital Twin: Demonstrating the Potential of Real Time Data Acquisition in Production Systems. In Procedia Manufacturing; 2017; Volume 9, pp. Pages 113–120. ISSN 2351-9789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zanchi, M.; Powell, D.J.; Gaiardelli, P.; Zouggar Amrani, A.; Romero, D. Assessing the Impact of Digital Lean Manufacturing Tools on Perceived Cognitive Workload: The Case of a “Pick-To-Light” Poka-Yoke 4.0 System. In Advances in Production Management Systems. Cyber-Physical-Human Production Systems: Human-AI Collaboration and Beyond. APMS 2025. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology; Mizuyama, H., Morinaga, E., Nonaka, T., Kaihara, T., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D., Eds.; Cham, 2026; vol 767. Springer. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Minerva, R.; Biru, A.; Rotondi, D. Towards a Definition of the Internet of Things. IEEE IoT Initiative; 2020. Available online: https://iot.ieee.org/images/files/pdf/IEEE_IoT_Towards_Definition_Internet_of_Things_Revision1_27MAY15.pdf.
- Al-Fuqaha, A.; Guizani, M.; Mohammadi, M.; Aledhari, M.; Ayyash, M. Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2015, 17, 2347–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, J.; Yu, W.; Zhang, N.; Yang, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, W. A Survey on Internet of Things: Architecture, Enabling Technologies, Security and Privacy, and Applications. IEEE Internet Things J. 2017, 4, 1125–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elkhodr, M.; Shahrestani, S.; Cheung, H. The Internet of Things: Vision & challenges. IEEE 2013 Tencon - Spring, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2013; pp. 218–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Node-RED Foundation. Node-RED: Flow-Based Programming for IoT. 2023. Available online: https://nodered.org/.
- Bender, B.; Bertheau, C.; Gronau, N. Future ERP Systems: A Research Agenda. Proc. 23rd Int. Conf. Enterp. Inf. Syst. - 2021, Volume 2, pages 776–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babu, M. S. P.; Sastry, S. H. Big data and predictive analytics in ERP systems for automating decision making process. 2014 IEEE 5th International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science, Beijing, China, 2014; pp. 259–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SAP, S.E. SAP NetWeaver Gateway and OData Services Documentation. 2022. Available online: https://help.sap.com/doc/saphelp_em92/9.2/en-US/ec/aeea50ca692309e10000000a445394/content.htm?no_cache=true.
- Leyh, C. Critical Success Factors for ERP System Implementation Projects: A Literature Review. *J. Enterp. Inf. Manag.* 2016, *29* 476–501. [CrossRef]
- Leyh, C.; Sander, P. Critical Success Factors for ERP System Implementation Projects: An Update of Literature Reviews. In Enterprise Systems. Strategic, Organizational, and Technological Dimensions. Pre-ICIS Pre-ICIS Pre-ICIS 2011 2012 2010. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing; Sedera, D., Gronau, N., Sumner, M., Eds.; Springer: Cham, 2015; vol 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cioffi, R.; Travaglioni, M.; Piscitelli, G.; Petrillo, A.; De Felice, F. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications in Smart Production: Progress, Trends, and Directions. Sustainability 2020, 12, 492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kusiak, A. Smart Manufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 56, 508–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Wan, J.; Li, D.; Zhang, C. Implementing Smart Factory of Industrie 4.0: An Outlook. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2016, 12(1). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toderas, M. Artificial Intelligence for Sustainability: A Systematic Review and Critical Analysis of AI Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rampasso, I.S.; Quelhas, O.L.G.; Anholon, R.; Pereira, M.B.; Miranda, J.D.A.; Alvarenga, W.S. Engineering Education for Sustainable Development: Evaluation Criteria for Brazilian Context. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lozano, R.; Merrill, M.Y.; Sammalisto, K.; Ceulemans, K.; Lozano, F.J. Connecting Competences and Pedagogical Approaches for Sustainable Development in Higher Education: A Literature Review and Framework Proposal. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Findler, F.; Schönherr, N.; Lozano, R.; Stacherl, B. Assessing the Impacts of Higher Education Institutions on Sustainable Development—An Analysis of Tools and Indicators. Sustainability 2019, 11, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Despeisse, M.; Baumers, M.; Brown, P.; Charnley, F.; Ford, S.J. A.; Garmulewicz; Knowles, S.; Minshall, T.H.W.; Mortara, L.; Reed-Tsochas, F.P.; Rowley, J. Unlocking value for a circular economy through 3D printing: A research agenda. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change Vol. 2017, Volume 115, Pages 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, Q.; Tao, F. Digital Twin and Big Data Towards Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0: 360 Degree Comparison. IEEE Access 2018, vol. 6, 3585–3593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barenji, V., A., Liu, X., Guo, H., Li, Z. A digital twin-driven approach towards smart manufacturing: reduced energy consumption for a robotic cell. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2021, 34(7–8), 844–859. [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y. Industry 4.0: A Survey on Technologies, Applications and Open Research Issues. *J. Ind. Inf. Integr.* 2017, *6*, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Zhang, J.; Wang, P. Deep Learning-Enhanced Digital Twin for Manufacturing. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2024, 102608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, W.; Yang, H.; Ji, Z.; Ba, M. Cognitive digital twin-enabled multi-robot collaborative manufacturing: Framework and approaches. Comput. Ind. Eng. Vol. Volume 194(2024), 110418. [CrossRef]
- García, Á.; Bregon, A.; Martínez-Prieto, M. A. Digital Twin Learning Ecosystem: A cyber–physical framework to integrate human-machine knowledge in traditional manufacturing. Internet Things Vol. Volume 25(2024), 101094. [CrossRef]
- Mourtzis; Angelopoulos, D. J.; Panopoulos, N. Digital Twin in Industries: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Access vol. 13, 47291–47336, 2025. [CrossRef]
- Bokhtiar, M.; Al Zami; Shaon, S.; Khanh Quy, V.; C. Nguyen, D. Digital Twin in Industries: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Access vol. 13, 47291–47336, 2025. [CrossRef]
- Ebni, Mohsen; Mojtaba Hosseini Bamakan, Seyed; Qu, Qiang. Digital Twin based Smart Manufacturing; From Design to Simulation and Optimization Schema. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2023, Volume 221, Pages 1216–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, A.; Younas, M.; Saharudin, M.S. Digital Twin Framework Using Real-Time Asset Tracking for Smart Flexible Manufacturing System. Machines 2025, 13, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Genta, G.; Galetto, M.; Franceschini, F. Inspection procedures in manufacturing processes: recent studies and research perspectives. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58(15), 4767–4788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mourtzis, D. Simulation in the design and operation of manufacturing systems: state of the art and new trends. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 58, 1927–1949. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:198482261. [CrossRef]
- Javaid, M.; Haleem, A. Additive Manufacturing Applications in Industry 4.0: A Review. J. Artic. J. Ind. Integr. Manag. [CrossRef]



| Metric | Traditional Lab Environment | Proposed Digital Twin Framework |
| Capital Expenditure (CAPEX) | High (Physical PLCs, Conveyors, Sensors, Robots) | Zero-Cost (Open source/Education Software) |
| Operational Expenditure (OPEX) | High (Maintenance, Parts, Infrastructure, Software) | Negligible (Software updates) |
| Energy Consumption | ~1.5 - 5.0 kW per session (Hardware) | ~0.1 - 0.3 kW (Workstation only) |
| Space Requirement | Dedicated laboratory square footage | Local or virtualized (Remote access capable) |
| Waste Generation | Potential E-waste from aging hardware | Zero physical waste |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.