Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Heterologous Expression Unexpectedly Activates the Host Cryptic Genes in Aspergillus nidulans and Enables the Discovery of Novel Natural Products

  † These authors contributed equally to this work.

Submitted:

04 May 2026

Posted:

05 May 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Aspergillus nidulans, a model filamentous fungus endowed with well-established genetic tools and a repertoire of cryptic secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs), is extensively exploited as a microbial chassis for heterologous biosynthesis. Mining of its secondary metabolites facilitates the discovery of novel bioactive compounds and the development and application of chassis cells. In the course of heterologous expression of exogenous genes in A. nidulans, we unexpectedly observed the activation of cryptic host BGCs, which resulted in substantial alterations to its secondary metabolic profile. Four previously undescribed compounds (1–4), together with six known analogs (5–10), were isolated from three recombinant A. nidulans strains. Notably, compounds 1–3 are the first naturally occurring examples of diketopiperazine-isoindolinone hybrid alkaloids, while compound 4 is a previously unreported benzofuran carboxylic acid derivative. Their structures and absolute configurations were assigned by interpretation of a combination of spectroscopic data and electronic circular dichroism calculations. Compounds 4 and 5 exhibited potent DPPH radical scavenging activity (IC50, 6.01 and 7.00 μg·mL-1, respectively). This study uncovers a "metabolic perturbation" effect on the host metabolic network during heterologous expression and offers a new strategy for activating silent gene clusters and discovering novel natural products through genetic manipulation.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Aspergillus nidulans is a classic type strain of filamentous fungi, and holds an irreplaceable position in the advancement of modern synthetic biology and microbial natural product discovery [1]. Its superiority is attributed to several core characteristics: first, it harbors a highly well-characterized and sophisticated genetic manipulation system, encompassing high-efficiency transformation protocols, a diverse array of selectable markers, and stringently controllable promoters, which enable precise and efficient gene knockout, overexpression, and heterologous integration. Second, A. nidulans itself has a strong and comprehensive biosynthetic capacity for secondary metabolites; its genome contains dozens of gene clusters encoding polyketide synthases (PKSs), non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs), and hybrid enzymes, representing a vast reservoir of natural products. More importantly, as a eukaryotic expression system, A. nidulans possesses post-translational modification, folding, and secretion pathways similar to those of higher organisms, enabling correct expression and assembly of multienzyme complexes with complex structures, making it outperforming to prokaryotic systems [2]. Therefore, A. nidulans has been widely engineered as an efficient “cell factory” for heterologous production of pharmaceutical precursors (e.g., penicillin [3]), industrial enzymes (e.g., cellulase [4]), and high-value natural products. Systematic exploration of the secondary metabolic profile of A. nidulans not only deepens the research dimension of this type strain to promote its development and application as a cell factory, but also is a key approach to discovering structurally novel and biologically active natural products [5].
Heterologous expression of silent biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) represents a key strategy for the discovery of novel bioactive natural products. In this study, we observed the unexpected activation of host silent BGCs in A. nidulans during heterologous expression [6,7]. When introducing two exogenous BGCs via an auxotrophic plasmid into A. nidulans, the secondary metabolic profiles of the corresponding recombinant strains were significantly altered. Then, we targeted the isolation of the newly generated metabolites from liquid cultures of the recombinant strains. From the ethyl acetate extract of the fermentation broth, we successfully isolated and identified ten compounds (Figure 1), including four new compounds (14) and six known compounds (510). Compounds 13 are the first naturally occurring examples of diketopiperazine-isoindolinone hybrid alkaloids. Compound 4 is a previously unreported benzofuran carboxylic acid derivative. And compounds 57 were isolated from A. nidulans for the first time. Analysis of the structures and biogeneses of the isolated compounds revealed that the biosynthesis of these compounds was not associated with exogenous genes, but attributed to the activation of silent gene clusters in the host. In addition, the in vitro antioxidant activities of all compounds were preliminarily evaluated, and compounds 4 and 5 showed significant DPPH radical scavenging activities.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General Experimental Procedures

Optical rotations were measured on an AUTOPOL IV polarimeter (Rudolph Research Analytical, USA). CD spectra were recorded on a JASCO J-815 circular dichroism spectrometer (Jasco, Japan). 1H, 13C NMR, and 2D NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker AV-Ⅲ-500 and Bruker AV Ⅲ-700 HD NMR spectrometers (Bruker, Germany) using tetramethylsilane (TMS) as a reference. ESI-MS and analytical HPLC were taken on a Waters ACQUITY H-Class with QDA mass detector (Kinetex® C18 column, 1.7 μm, 100 mm × 2.1 mm). HR-ESI-MS data were performed on an Agilent 6520 Accurate-Mass Q-TOFLC/MS spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Ltd., Santa Clara, CA, USA). Reversed-phase medium pressure liquid chromatography (RP-MPLC) was carried out using BUCHI Reveleris® Prep medium-pressure liquid chromatography system (Büchi, Switzerland); Semi-preparative reversed-phase HPLC was performed on an SSI semi-preparative HPLC system with DAD detector (Scientific Systems, USA) using a Silgreen C18 column (5 μm, 250 mm × 20 mm, Beijing Green Herbs Science and Technology, China).

2.2. Materials and Culture Conditions

The strains used in this study are listed in Table S1. Penicillium dangeardii and Calcarisporium arbuscula, the source fungi of the exogenous gene clusters, were cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA, BD) at 28 °C for 5–7 days. Mycelia were then transferred into potato dextrose broth (PDB, BD) for genomic DNA extraction. Escherichia coli XL1-Blue was used for DNA manipulation. The recombinant A. nidulans strains used in this study were constructed by transforming the auxotrophic host strain A8030 [8] with expression plasmids carrying the target biosynthetic genes, following the general methods described by Wang et al [9]. The expression cassettes utilized four different promoters to drive gene expression: the constitutive gpdA promoter, the inducible AmyB promoter, the glaA promoter and the Ptub promoter. Selection markers complementing uracil (pyrG), pyridoxine (pyroA), and riboflavin (riboB) auxotrophies were employed to isolate transformants. Saccharomyces cerevisiae BJ5464-NpgA was used for plasmid construction.

2.3. Bioinformatic Analysis

The whole-genome of P. dangeardii [10,11] and C. arbuscula [12,13] had been previously sequenced. The gene clusters were analyzed by antiSMASH fungal version (https://fungismash.secondarymetabolites.org) and 2ndFind (http://biosyn.nih.go.jp/2nd find), manually checked by NCBI blast (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).

2.4. Gene Cloning, Plasmid Construction, and Genetic Manipulation

The plasmids and primers used in this work are listed in Tables S2 and S3, respectively. After 4 days of culturing in PDB, the genomic DNA of P. dangeardii and C. arbuscula was extracted using genomic DNA extraction kit (Tiangen, Beijing). All nrp and tca genes and their native terminators (500 bp downstream from the stop codon) were amplified by PCR using genomic DNA as the template. Polymerase chain reactions for cloning were performed using KOD-plus-neo or KOD oneTM PCR Master Mix (Toyobo Life Science) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA restriction enzymes were used as recommended by the manufacturer (NEB). The plasmids for A. nidulans A8030 expression were constructed by yeast homologous recombination method. Briefly, These PCR fragments and linearized pANP/pANR/pANU were co-transformed to S. cerevisiae using PEG/LiAc mediated method and spread on histidine-uracil-dropout semisynthetic medium. The plasmids of single clones were rescued using Zymoprep Yeast Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research) and transformed to E. coli XL1-Blue for sequencing. The same procedures were used for construction of all plasmids. Constructs verified by restriction enzyme digestion and Sanger sequencing were used for A. nidulans transformation.

2.5. Transformation of A. nidulans

Protoplasts were prepared via enzymatic digestion of germinated conidia using a combination of lysing enzyme (Sigma-Aldrich) and Yatalase (Takara) in Osmetic Buffer. Purified plasmid DNA (5–10 μg) was added to the protoplast suspension in STC Buffer, and the mixture was incubated on ice for 50 min. PEG-mediated transformation was performed by the addition of PEG4000 solution, after which the transformation mixture was plated onto selective CD-sorbitol medium. Transformants were purified through single-colony isolation and subsequently verified by diagnostic PCR. For multi-gene expression, either individual plasmids or co-transformation of multiple expression cassettes was carried out. Correct integration of the expression constructs was confirmed by PCR amplification using primers specific to the flanking genomic regions [14]. At last, three recombinant strains AN-nrpACDEFGHI, AN-nrpEFGHI and AN-tcaABCDEFGHI were constructed. Transformants were verified by PCR, transferred to fresh plates and cultured for 2–3 days, then spores were harvested and stored at -80 °C.

2.6. Fungal Fermentation

Spores of the three A. nidulans recombinant strains stored at -80 °C, were evenly plated onto CD sporulation medium and activated via incubation at 37 °C for 48 h. The activated spores were subsequently inoculated into 1 L of CD-ST liquid fermentation medium in Erlenmeyer flasks, with a total fermentation volume of 6 L for each of the three A. nidulans recombinant strains, followed by incubation at 25 °C with orbital shaking at 220 rpm for 7 days.

2.7. Extraction and Isolation

Following completion of the fermentation, the culture broth was mixed with an equal volume of ethyl acetate and subjected to thorough liquid-liquid extraction via vigorous shaking; this extraction procedure was repeated three times. The combined ethyl acetate fractions were concentrated under reduced pressure at 40 °C, yielding dark brown crude extract 1 (1.2 g, from AN-nrpACDEFGHI), dark brown crude extract 2 (1.3 g, from AN-tcaABCDEFGHI), and dark brown crude extract 3 (1.5 g, from AN-nrpEFGHI), respectively.
The extract 1 was mixed with 2.5 g of diatomaceous earth and subjected to ODS medium-pressure liquid chromatography with a gradient of methanol-water (30%–99%, v/v) to obtain fractions 1–6 (R1–R6). Fractions containing target compounds were R5 (32.90 mg). R5 was separated by semi-preparative HPLC (methanol-water, 28:72, v/v, 0.1% formic acid, Silgreen column, 250 mm × 20 mm) at 3.0 mL/min to yield compound 1 (3.50 mg, tR = 18.7 min), compound 2 (3.00 mg, tR = 16.1 min), and compound 3 (2.50 mg, tR = 13.5 min).
The extract 2 was mixed with 3 g of diatomaceous earth and subjected to ODS medium-pressure liquid chromatography with a gradient of acetonitrile-water (40%–99%, v/v) to obtain fractions 1–9 (C1–C9). Fractions containing target compounds were C3 (20.10 mg), C4 (8.50 mg) and C7 (116.30 mg). C3 and C4 were analyzed by LC-MS (acetonitrile-water, 5%–99%, v/v) and found to be pure (>95%), thus they were not further purified and were identified as compound 4 (8.50 mg, tR = 5.10 min) and compound 5 (20.10 mg, tR = 4.65 min), respectively. C7 was separated by semi-preparative HPLC (acetonitrile-water, 50:50, v/v, 0.1% formic acid, Silgreen column, 250 mm × 20 mm) at 3.0 mL/min to yield compound 6 (2.64 mg, tR = 28.5 min), compound 7 (13.14 mg, tR = 31.6 min), and compound 8 (4.43 mg, tR = 35.9 min).
The extract 3 was mixed with 4 g of diatomaceous earth and subjected to ODS medium-pressure liquid chromatography with a gradient of methanol-water (30%–99%, v/v) to obtain fractions 1–6 (U1–U6). Fractions containing target compounds were U2 (58.00 mg). U2 was separated by semi-preparative HPLC (methanol-water, 28:72, v/v, 0.1% formic acid, Silgreen column, 250 mm × 20 mm) at 3.0 mL/min to yield compound 9 (1.00 mg, tR = 12.5 min) and compound 10 (1.50 mg, tR = 14.5 min).
Cicpiperazinone A (1): Pale yellow powder; sparingly soluble in methanol; [ α ] D 20 -35.7 (c 0.042, MeOH); 1H and 13C NMR data, see Table 1 and Figures S1–S5; HR-ESI-MS showed a quasi-molecular ion peak at m/z 609.2929 [M+H]⁺ (calcd for C32H41N4O8, 609.2919), indicating a molecular formula of C32H40N4O8 with 15 degrees of unsaturation.
Cicpiperazinone B (2): Pale yellow powder; slightly soluble in methanol; [ α ] D 20 -26.1 (c 0.092, MeOH); 1H and 13C NMR data, see Table 1 and Figures S6–S10; HR-ESI-MS showed a quasi-molecular ion peak at m/z 452.2187 [M+H]⁺ (calcd for C25H30N3O5, 452.2180), indicating a molecular formula of C25H29N3O5 with 13 degrees of unsaturation.
Cicpiperazinone C (3): Pale yellow powder; slightly soluble in methanol; [ α ] D 20 -31.5 (c 0.108, MeOH); 1H and 13C NMR data, see Table 1 and Figures S11–S15; HR-ESI-MS showed a quasi-molecular ion peak at m/z 418.2340 [M+H]⁺ (calcd for C22H32N3O5, 418.2336), indicating a molecular formula of C22H31N3O5 with 9 degrees of unsaturation.
Asperfuranic acid (4): Brown-red amorphous powder; readily soluble in methanol; [ α ] D 20 -12.62 (c 0.103, MeOH); 1H and 13C NMR data, see Table 2 and Figures S16–S20; HR-ESI-MS showed a quasi-molecular ion peak at m/z 263.0923 [M+H]⁺ (calcd for C14H15O5, 263.0914), indicating a molecular formula of C14H14O5 with 8 degrees of unsaturation.

2.8. ECD Calculations of 1 and 2

Conformational analyses of compounds 1 and 2 were performed in Yinfo Cloud Platform (https://cloud.yinfotek.com) using Confab [15] with the Stochastic algorithm at an MMFF94 force field with an RMSD threshold of 0.5 Å and an energy window of 7 kcal·mol−1. All theoretical calculations were carried out using Gaussian 09 (Revision D.01). Conformers were consecutively optimized at the PM6 semi-empirical level and HF/6-31G(d) theoretical level, and room-temperature equilibrium populations were calculated based on the Boltzmann distribution law, with dominant conformers showing populations greater than 1% retained for further optimization. The selected conformers were finally fully optimized at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level in the gas phase, and vibrational frequency analysis was performed to confirm no imaginary frequencies for all stable structures. ECD calculations were conducted in methanol with the IEFPCM solvation model via time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) at the B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) level, with rotatory strengths for 30 excited states calculated for each conformer. The final ECD spectra were simulated by overlapping Gaussian functions for each transition using the ECD/UV analysis tool in the Yinfo Cloud Platform, and were compared with the experimental CD spectra.

2.9. Bioactivity Assay

The in vitro antioxidant activities of compounds 110 were evaluated using the 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging method [16], with the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) as the evaluation index and ascorbic acid (Vc) as the positive control. Experimental procedure: Compounds 110 and Vc were dissolved in anhydrous methanol to prepare 10.0 mM stock solutions, which were serially diluted to 250, 125, 62.5, 31.25, and 15.63 μM test solutions. DPPH was dissolved in anhydrous ethanol to prepare a working solution at 200 μM. In 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes, experimental groups (Ai: 150 μL sample solution + 150 μL DPPH working solution), control groups (Ac: 150 μL sample solution + 150 μL anhydrous methanol), and blank groups (Aⱼ: 150 μL anhydrous methanol + 150 μL DPPH working solution) were set up, each concentration in triplicate. After mixing, the tubes were incubated at room temperature in the dark for 30 min. After reaction, 200 μL of each reaction mixture was transferred to a 96-well plate, and the absorbance was measured at 517 nm using a microplate reader. The DPPH radical scavenging rate K (%) was calculated as: K (%) = [1 – (Ai – Ac) / Aj] × 100%, where Ai, Ac, and Aj are the absorbance values of the corresponding groups. Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel; the half-logarithmic curve of scavenging rate versus concentration was plotted, and the IC50 was calculated by a cubic regression equation to compare and evaluate the antioxidant activities of the compounds.

3. Results

3.1. Heterologous Expression Products Analysis

To discover structurally novel natural products, we mined two putative BGCs (Figure 2), including a non-reducing polyketide synthase (NR-PKS) BGC (nrp) and a sesquiterpene BGC (tca) from two previously analyzed endophytic fungi P. dangeardii [10,11] and C. arbuscula [12,13], respectively, for heterologous expression. We used A. nidulans A8030 as the heterologous host and created three recombinant strains AN-nrpACDEFGHI, AN-nrpEFGHI and AN-tcaABCDEFGHI. Comparative chromatographic analysis of the crude extracts from the recombinant strains and the control strain showed that their secondary metabolic profiles displayed significant differences (Figure 3). All of the three recombinant strains generated a series of new product peaks that were not observed in the control strain, suggesting that cryptic BGCs in the three recombinant strains had been activated. To characterize the newly produced metabolites in the recombinant strains, we conducted large-scale fermentation and performed metabolite isolation from the fermentation extract of the recombinant strains. As a result, three novel diketopiperazine-isoindolinone hybrid alkaloids cicpiperazinones A–C (13), two known polyketides nidulol (9) and cichorine (10) were isolated from the recombinant strains AN-nrpACDEFGHI and AN-nrpEFGHI of a NR-PKS BGC nrp, respectively. Four polyketides including a new asperfuranic acid (4), asperfuran (5), dichotomone (6), and microperfuranone (8), as well as one PKS-NRPS hybrid α-cyclopiazonic acid (7) were isolated from the recombinant strain AN-tcaABCDEFGHI of a sesquiterpene BGC tca.
Further analyzing the correlation between the newly produced compounds and the exogenous gene clusters, we obtained unexpected results. The BGC cic of compounds 910, differing from the exogenous BGC nrp, had been previously founded in A. nidulans [17]. Compounds 13 are diketopiperazine derivatives incorporating a fragment of compound 10. Thus, the biosynthesis of these compounds don’t originated from the exogenous NR-PKS BGC nrp, but are more possibly related to the activation of silent BGCs in host A. nidulans. Meanwhile, compounds 48 belong to polyketides or PKS-NRPS hybrid, obviously indicating that the biosynthesis of them are not related to the sesquiterpene BGC tca. Collectively, structure and biosynthesis correlation analysis suggested that the biosynthesis of 110 was not derived from the heterologously expressed BGCs. Instead, all isolated compounds were related to the activation of cryptic BGCs endogenous to the host A. nidulans.

3.2. Structure Elucidation

Compound 1: pale yellow powder, sparingly soluble in methanol, [ α ] D 20 -35.7 (c 0.042, MeOH). HR-ESI-MS showed a quasi-molecular ion peak at m/z 609.2929 [M+H]⁺ (calcd for C32H41N4O8, 609.2919), indicating a molecular formula of C32H40N4O8 with 15 degrees of unsaturation. The 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6) and 13C NMR (175 MHz, DMSO-d6) spectra (Table 1), in conjunction with the molecular formula, suggested that 1 is a symmetric dimer, with half of the molecule accounting for 16 carbons. The 13C NMR spectrum displayed signals for 8 sp2 carbons (including two carbonyls) and 8 sp3 carbons per half. Detailed analysis of the 1D NMR data with the aid of an HSQC spectrum revealed the presence of two exchangeable protons [δH 8.12 (s, 1-NH) and 9.77 (s, 16-OH)], two methines [δC 103.0 (C-17), δC 53.9 (C-6)], five methylenes [δC 47.9 (C-13), 41.5 (C-10), 32.8 (C-7), 27.6 (C-9), 21.8 (C-8)], and two methyl groups [δC 58.8 (C-20), 9.4 (C-21)].
The 1H-1H COSY spectrum (Figure 4) revealed a continuous aliphatic chain along with an N-atom spin system for 1-NH/H-6/H2-7/H2-8/H2-9/H2-10, establishing the N1-C10 chain. HMBC correlations (Figure 4) were pivotal in assembling the structure. Correlations from H-6 to C-5/C-1 (δC 167.9), C-7, and C-8, and from 4-NH to C-5 and C-6, established the presence of a 2,5-diketopiperazine (DKP) ring. The remaining fragment was identified as a highly substituted isoindolinone moiety. HMBC correlations from H-10 to C-8, C-9, C-11 (δC 167.1), and C-13 (δC 47.9), from H-13 to C-11, C-14 (δC 153.3), C-18 (δC 120.7), and C-19 (δC 131.9), and from H-17 (δH 6.82) to C-11, C-15 (δC 118.9), C-16 (δC 156.5), and C-19, combined with the chemical shifts of C-10 and C-13, confirming a 2,3-dihydro-isoindolin-1-one core with the N-atom connected to C-10. The placements of the methoxy, methyl, and hydroxyl groups on this core were deduced from HMBC correlations: H3-20 (δH 3.87) with C-14, H3-21 (δH 2.05) with C-14, C-15, and C-16, and the exchangeable proton 16-OH with C-15. Thus, the planar structure of 1 was elucidated as a symmetric diketopiperazine dimer consisting of a DKP core with two identical 4-(isoindolinone)butyl side chains.
Compound 1 possesses two chiral centers. Its optical rotation is  [ α ] D 20  -35.7 (c 0.042, MeOH). If the relative configuration was (R*, S*), the compound would be a mesomer and optically inactive. Therefore, the absolute configuration of 1 must be either (3S, 6S) or (3R, 6R). Comparison of the experimental CD spectrum of compound 1 in comparison with calculated ECD spectra (Figure 5A) showed that the experimental CD spectrum of 1 was good agreement with that of the (3R, 6R) enantiomer. Literature reports [18] ndicated that diketopiperazines with the (3S, 6S) configuration exhibit positive optical rotation, opposite to that of compound 1, further supporting the (3R, 6R) assignment. Consequently, the absolute configuration of 1 was assigned as (3R, 6R), and it was named cicpiperazinone A.
Compound 2: pale yellow powder, slightly soluble in methanol, [ α ] D 20 -26.1 (c 0.092, MeOH). HR-ESI-MS showed a quasi-molecular ion peak at m/z 452.2187 [M+H]⁺ (calcd for C25H30N3O5, 452.2180), indicating a molecular formula of C25H29N3O5 with 13 degrees of unsaturation. Comparison of the NMR data of 2 (Table 1) with those of 1 revealed a high degree of similarity for signals corresponding to the isoindolinone moiety (C-11 to C-21) and part of the aliphatic chain (C-6 to C-10), suggesting that 2 shares the same 4-(isoindolinone)butyl side chain as 1. However, significant differences were observed in the DKP ring region. Instead of the symmetric DKP signals, the NMR spectra of 2 displayed resonances for an extra monosubstituted benzene ring [δC 136.2 (C-23), 130.4 (C-24), 128.0 (C-25), 126.7 (C-26); δH 7.14–7.22] and an additional methylene (δC 38.2, C-22), along with the asymmetric DKP ring [δC 55.3 (C-3), 53.7 (C-6), 167.0 (C-2), 166.2 (C-5); δH 8.05 (s, 1-NH), 8.12 (s, 4-NH)]. This indicated the presence of a phenylalanine, which was comfirmed by HMBC (Figure 4) correlations from H-3 to C-22 and C-23, and from H2-22 to C-2, C-3, and the aromatic carbons C-23 and C-24. Therefore, the planar structure of 2 was established as a DKP with a benzyl substituent at C-3 and the same 4-(isoindolinone)butyl side chain at C-6 as in 1.
The relative configuration of compound 2 was established by analysis of the NOESY spectrum. The key NOE correlation (Figure 6) between H3-20 and H-26 indicated that the benzyl and the 4-(isoindolinone)butyl side chain are situated on the same face of the DKP ring. Consequently, the absolute configuration of compound 2 is restricted to either (3R, 6R) or (3S, 6S). The experimental CD spectrum of 2 matched well with the calculated ECD spectrum for the (3R, 6R) enantiomer (Figure 5B), which was consistent with the negative optical rotation ( [ α ] D 20 -26.1) and the biosynthetic relationship with 1. Thus, the absolute configuration of 2 was also assigned as (3R, 6R), and compound 2 was named cicpiperazinone B.
Compound 3: pale yellow powder, slightly soluble in methanol, [ α ] D 20 -31.5 (c 0.108, MeOH). HR-ESI-MS showed a quasi-molecular ion peak at m/z 418.2340 [M+H]⁺ (calcd for C22H32N3O5, 418.2336), indicating a molecular formula of C22H31N3O5 with 9 degrees of unsaturation. The NMR data of 3 (Table 1) were very similar to those of 2, particularly for the signals corresponding to the isoindolinone moiety (C-11 to C-21) and the aliphatic chain (C-6 to C-10). The key difference was the replacement of the benzyl group signals in 2 with signals for an isobutyl group [δC 38.0 (C-22), 24.3 (C-23), 15.1 (C-24), 11.9 (C-25); δH 1.83 (H-22), 1.39 (H2-23), 0.89 (H3-24), 0.83 (H3-25)].
The 1H-1H COSY spectrum showed correlations for H3-25/H-22/H2-23/H3-24, confirming the presence of the isobutyl fragment. HMBC correlations from H-3 to C-2, C-22, and C-25, and from H-22 to C-2, C-24, and C-25 positioned the isobutyl group at C-3 of the DKP ring (Figure 4). Thus, the planar structure of 3 was established as a DKP with an isobutyl substituent at C-3 and the same 4-(isoindolinone)butyl side chain at C-6.
Based on the same biogenetic considerations as 1 and 2 and the negative optical rotation value ( [ α ] D 20 -31.5), which was consistent with 1 and 2, the absolute configuration at C-3 and C-6 was proposed to be 3R,6R. The configuration at C-22 was assigned as S, in accordance with that of L-isoleucine, a biosynthetic precursor of 3. Thus, the absolute configuration of 3 was putatively assigned as 3R,6R,22S, and compound 3 was named cicpiperazinone C.
Compound 4: brown-red amorphous powder, readily soluble in methanol, [ α ] D 20 -12.6 (c 0.103, MeOH). HR-ESI-MS showed a quasi-molecular ion peak at m/z 263.0923 [M+H]⁺ (calcd for C14H15O5, 263.0914), indicating a molecular formula of C14H14O5 with 8 degrees of unsaturation. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD) and 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD3OD) data are shown in Table 2. The 13C NMR spectrum displayed 11 sp2 signals (including one carbonyl) and three sp3 signals. Analysis of the HSQC spectrum identified one methyl (δC 18.3, C-13), one methylene (δC 28.5, C-2), six methines (five olefinic and one oxygenated), and six quaternary carbons (five aromatic and one carboxylic δC 171.8, C-14).
The 1H-1H COSY spectrum (Figure 4) revealed a heptadiene spin system (H2-2/H-1/H-9/H-10/H-11/H-12/H3-13). The large coupling constants (J9,10 = 15.3 Hz and J11,12 = 14.5 Hz) established the trans geometry for both the Δ 9 and Δ 11 double bonds. HMBC correlations (Figure 4) from H-6 to C-8 (δC 135.9), C-7 (δC 155.7) and C-4 (δC 100.2), from H2-2 to C-3 (δC 125.6), C-4, and C-8, and from H-1 to C-2, and C-3, combined the downfield chemical shifts of C-1 (δC 80.65) and C-8, established the 2,3-dihydrobenzofuran ring connected with the conjugated diene side chain at C-1. The highly downfield-shifted quaternary carbons C-5 (δC 159.1) and C-7 (δC 155.7) indicated they were oxygenated, and the chemical shift of C-6 (δC 101.9) was characteristic of a carbon in benzene ring flanked by two oxygenated substituents, confirming the presence of two hydroxyl groups at C-5 and C-7. The carboxylic acid group C-14 (δC 171.8) was placed at C-4 based on HMBC correlation from H-6 to C-4 and C-14. Furthermore, the Infrared (IR) spectrum of compound 4 displayed characteristic absorptions of a carboxylic acid functionality, including a broad O-H stretching band (3300-2500 cm-1) and a carbonyl absorption (1673 cm-1) of a conjugated carboxyl group, thus corroborating the presence of a free carboxyl moiety (Figure S22).
Since the planar structure of compound 4 is highly similar to known compound asperfuran, just possesses an additional carboxyl group at C-4, and the optical rotation of compound 4 ( [ α ] D 20 -12.6) has the same sign as that of (R)-asperfuran [19]( [ α ] D 20 -20.9), the absolute configuration of C-1 in 4 was assigned as R. Then, compound 4 was named asperfuranic acid.
In addition to the above new compounds (14), six known compounds were identified as asperfuran (5) [19], dichotomone (6) [20,21], α-cyclopiazonic acid (7) [22,23], microperfuranone (8) [24,25], nidulol (9) [17], cichorine (10)[17,[26], respectively, by comparing spectroscopic and specific rotation data with those reported in the literature. This represents the first report of compounds 57 from A. nidulans.

3.3. Bioactivity Assay

The in vitro antioxidant activities of compounds 110 were preliminarily evaluated using the DPPH radical scavenging method. The results demonstrated that compounds 4 and 5 exerted potent free radical scavenging activity, whereas compounds 68 displayed moderate antioxidant efficacy (Table 3).

4. Discussion

In this study, during heterologous expression in A. nidulans, we unexpectedly observed the activation of silent secondary metabolite gene clusters from the host strain, leading to the isolation of ten newly produced metabolites, including three novel diketopiperazine-isoindolinone hybrids (13) and one new benzofuran carboxylic acid derivative (4). This phenomenon suggests that introduction of exogenous genes is not a simple “addition” process but may trigger extensive remodeling of metabolic and regulatory networks within the host cell. From a mechanistic perspective, heterologous expression might perturb the host and activate silent gene clusters through the following pathways: (i) Perturbation of intracellular metabolite homeostasis [27]: The expression of heterologous enzymes may lead to the consumption or accumulation of specific biosynthetic precursors, thereby altering the distribution of metabolic flux and further impacting the regulatory networks of secondary metabolism; (ii) Competition for regulatory proteins [6]: the heterologous expression vectors may occupy transcriptional or translational resources, indirectly affecting the expression and function of endogenous regulators, leading to derepression of some silent gene clusters; (iii) Stress response activation [28]: introduction of foreign DNA or expression of heterologous proteins may trigger cellular stress responses in fungi, activating various defense mechanisms including secondary metabolism; (iv) Epigenetic regulation perturbation [29]: studies have shown that expression of secondary metabolite gene clusters in fungi is often regulated by epigenetic mechanisms such as histone modifications; heterologous expression may interfere with the function or expression balance of related epigenetic modifying enzymes.
Compounds 13 possess the novel rare diketopiperazine-isoindolinone hybrid skeleton and are discovered in nature for the first time, adding new structural types to fungal diketopiperazine natural products. New compound 4 is structurally similar to the known compound 5, representing a carboxylated derivative. Notably, bioactivity screening revealed that 4 and 5 both exhibited strong antioxidant activity (IC50 6.01 and 7.00 μg·mL-1, respectively), significantly better than the other compounds. This suggests that introduction of a carboxyl group may enhance radical scavenging ability, providing a reference for structure-based antioxidant design. Although compounds 57 are known structures, their isolation from A. nidulans is reported here for the first time, indicating untapped metabolic potential in this strain.
From a methodological perspective, the use of heterologous expression as a trigger of "metabolic perturbation" to activate cryptic BGCs provides a novel strategy for microbial natural product discovery. However, this strategy currently faces notable challenges, including the unpredictability of activation efficiency and the lack of a clear mechanistic understanding. Further investigations should integrate multi-omics analyses (transcriptomics, metabolomics, and epigenomics) to systematically dissect the global alterations in regulatory networks induced by heterologous expression, while rationally designing expression constructs or co-expressing key regulatory factors to enhance the efficiency and specificity of cryptic BGCs activation.
In summary, this study not only reports several structurally novel and biologically active natural products but also reveals a new phenomenon of activating silent gene clusters through heterologous expression perturbation of the host metabolic network, providing new insights and experimental basis for fungal natural product discovery and development of synthetic biology chassis cells.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org, Table S1: Strains used in the study; Table S2: Plasmids used in the study; Table S3: Primers used in the study; Media and Buffers; Figure S1–S5: NMR spectra of compound 1; Figure S6–S11: NMR spectra of compound 2; Figure S12–S16: NMR spectra of compound 3; Figure S17–S22: NMR and IR spectra of compound 4.

Author Contributions

C. Liu drafted the work and performed the data analysis, heterologous expression, isolation and characterization of compounds 48, and biological evaluations. Y. Hao separated compounds 13, 9 and 10. S. Qi assisted in the structural elucidation of several compounds. J. Bai designed and supervised the project and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS, No. 2021-I2M-1-029 and 2023-I2M-2-006).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author(s).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yaegashi, J.; Oakley, B.R.; Wang, C.C. Recent advances in genome mining of secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters and the development of heterologous expression systems in Aspergillus nidulans. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 41, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wiemann, P.; Soukup, A.A.; Folz, J.S.; et al. CoIN: co-inducible nitrate expression system for secondary metabolites in Aspergillus nidulans. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol. 2018, 5, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tobin, M.B.; Fleming, M.D.; Skatrud, P.L.; et al. Molecular characterization of the acyl-coenzyme A:isopenicillin N acyltransferase gene (penDE) from Penicillium chrysogenum and Aspergillus nidulans and activity of recombinant enzyme in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 5908–5914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kumar, A. Aspergillus nidulans: A potential resource of the production of the native and heterologous enzymes for industrial applications. Int. J. Microbiol. 2020, 2020, 8894215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Caesar, L.K.; Kelleher, N.L.; Keller, N.P. In the fungus where it happens: History and future propelling Aspergillus nidulans as the archetype of natural products research. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2020, 144, 103477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bergmann, S.; Funk, A.N.; Scherlach, K.; et al. Activation of a silent fungal polyketide biosynthesis pathway through regulatory cross talk with a cryptic nonribosomal peptide synthetase gene cluster. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 8143–8149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guo, S.; Pardeshi, L.; Qin, L.; et al. Systematic over-expression of secondary metabolism transcription factors to reveal the pharmaceutical potential of Aspergillus nidulans. Commun. Biol. 2025, 8, 1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lin, S.Y.; Oakley, C.E.; Jenkinson, C.B.; et al. A heterologous expression platform in Aspergillus nidulans for the elucidation of cryptic secondary metabolism biosynthetic gene clusters: discovery of the Aspergillus fumigatus sartorypyrone biosynthetic pathway. Chem. Sci. 2023, 14, 11022–11032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Kunya; Liu, Bingyu; Yan, Daojiang; et al. Full biosynthetic pathway of pyrrolobenzoxazines. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2025, 36, 1001–8417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bai, J.; Yan, D.; Zhang, T.; et al. A Cascade of Redox Reactions Generates Complexity in the Biosynthesis of the Protein Phosphatase-2 Inhibitor Rubratoxin A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56(17), 4782–4786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wei, Q.; Bai, J.; Yan, D.; et al. Genome mining combined metabolic shunting and OSMAC strategy of an endophytic fungus leads to the production of diverse natural products. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2021, 11(2), 572–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bai, J.; Mu, R.; Dou, M.; et al. Epigenetic modification in histone deacetylase deletion strain of Calcarisporium arbuscula leads to diverse diterpenoids. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2018, 8(4), 687–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mao, X.M.; Xu, W.; Li, D.; et al. Epigenetic genome mining of an endophytic fungus leads to the pleiotropic biosynthesis of natural products. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54(26), 7592–7596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Roux, I.; Chooi, Y. H. Cre/lox-Mediated Chromosomal Integration of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters for Heterologous Expression in Aspergillus nidulans. ACS Synth. Biol. 2022, 11(3), 1186–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. O’Boyle, N. M.; Vandermeersch, T.; Flynn, C. J.; et al. Confab-systematic generation of diverse low-energy conformers. J. Cheminform. 2011, 3, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yen, G.C.; Chen, H.Y. Antioxidant activity of various tea extracts in relation to their antimutagenicity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1995, 43, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sanchez, J.F.; Entwistle, R.; Corcoran, D.; et al. Identification and molecular genetic analysis of the cichorine gene cluster in Aspergillus nidulans. Med. Chem. Commun. 2012, 3, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gao, S.S.; Duan, A.; Xu, W.; et al. Phenalenone polyketide cyclization catalyzed by fungal polyketide synthase and flavin-dependent monooxygenase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 4249–4259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Pfefferle, W.; Anke, H.; Bross, M.; et al. Asperfuran, a novel antifungal metabolite from Aspergillus oryzae. J. Antibiot. 1990, 43, 648–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Orfali, R.; Perveen, S. Secondary metabolites from the Aspergillus sp. in the rhizosphere soil of Phoenix dactylifera (Palm tree). BMC Chem. 2019, 13, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Barra, L.; Barac, P.; König, G.M.; et al. Volatiles from the fungal microbiome of the marine sponge Callyspongia cf. flammea. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 7411–7421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lin, A.Q.; Du, L.; Fang, Y.C.; et al. iso-α-Cyclopiazonic acid, a new natural product isolated from the marine-derived fungus Aspergillus flavus C-F-3. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2009, 45, 677–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Beyer, C.; Scherkenbeck, J.; Sondermann, F.; et al. The Knight route to cyclopiazonic acid: enantioselective synthesis of a key intermediate. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 7119–7123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fujimoto, H.; Asai, T.; Kim, Y.P.; et al. Nine constituents including six xanthone-related compounds isolated from two ascomycetes, Gelasinospora santi-florii and Emericella quadrilineata, found in a screening study focused on immunomodulatory activity. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2006, 54, 550–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lü, F.; Li, X.; Chi, L.; et al. A new acyclic peroxide from Aspergillus nidulans SD-531, a fungus obtained from deep-sea sediment of cold spring in the South China Sea. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2020, 38, 1225–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Moreau, A.; Couture, A.; Deniau, E.; et al. First total synthesis of cichorine and zinnimidine. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 2305–2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Park, S.C.; Steffan, B.N.; Yun Lim, F.; et al. Terpenoid balance in Aspergillus nidulans unveiled by heterologous squalene synthase expression. Sci. Adv. 2024, 10, eadk7416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kocsis, B.; Boldizsár, I.; Kovács, G.M.; et al. Could the transcription factor AtnN coordinating the aspercryptin secondary metabolite gene cluster in Aspergillus nidulans be a global regulator? Fungal Biol. 2024, 128, 2311–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Reyes-Dominguez, Y.; Bok, J.W.; Berger, H.; et al. Heterochromatic marks are associated with the repression of secondary metabolism clusters in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 1376–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chemical structures of compounds 110.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of compounds 110.
Preprints 211856 g001
Figure 2. (A) The NR-PKS BGC nrp from P. dangeardii. The core gene of this gene cluster is NR-PKS nrpG. Its domain analysis revealed a modular architecture consisting of starter unit acyltransferase (SAT), acyltransferase (AT), ketosynthase (KS), product template (PT), acyl carrier protein (ACP), and thioesterase (TE) domains. Flanking nrpG are genes encoding auxiliary enzymes and regulatory elements, including a FAD-dependent oxidoreductase (NrpA), a transcription factor (NrpB), a cytochrome P450 enzyme (NrpC), a flavin-containing monooxygenase (NrpD), a reductase (NrpE), a short-chain dehydrogenase (NrpF), a dehydrogenase (NrpH), and an O-methyltransferase (NrpI). (B) The sesquiterpene BGC tca from C. arbuscula. The core gene of this gene cluster is the terpene cyclase tcaE. Other enzymes include a GlcNAc-1-P transferase (TcaA), a hydrolase (TcaB), a cytochrome P450 enzyme (TcaC), an O-glycosyltransferase (TcaD), a methyltransferase (TcaF), an isocitrate dehydrogenase (TcaG), a transcription factor (TcaH), and a glycosidase (TcaI).
Figure 2. (A) The NR-PKS BGC nrp from P. dangeardii. The core gene of this gene cluster is NR-PKS nrpG. Its domain analysis revealed a modular architecture consisting of starter unit acyltransferase (SAT), acyltransferase (AT), ketosynthase (KS), product template (PT), acyl carrier protein (ACP), and thioesterase (TE) domains. Flanking nrpG are genes encoding auxiliary enzymes and regulatory elements, including a FAD-dependent oxidoreductase (NrpA), a transcription factor (NrpB), a cytochrome P450 enzyme (NrpC), a flavin-containing monooxygenase (NrpD), a reductase (NrpE), a short-chain dehydrogenase (NrpF), a dehydrogenase (NrpH), and an O-methyltransferase (NrpI). (B) The sesquiterpene BGC tca from C. arbuscula. The core gene of this gene cluster is the terpene cyclase tcaE. Other enzymes include a GlcNAc-1-P transferase (TcaA), a hydrolase (TcaB), a cytochrome P450 enzyme (TcaC), an O-glycosyltransferase (TcaD), a methyltransferase (TcaF), an isocitrate dehydrogenase (TcaG), a transcription factor (TcaH), and a glycosidase (TcaI).
Preprints 211856 g002
Figure 3. HPLC analyses of the crude extracts from the recombinant strains of (A) the NR-PKS BGC nrp and (B) the sesquiterpene BGC tca.
Figure 3. HPLC analyses of the crude extracts from the recombinant strains of (A) the NR-PKS BGC nrp and (B) the sesquiterpene BGC tca.
Preprints 211856 g003
Figure 4. 1H-1H COSY and key HMBC correlations of compounds 14.
Figure 4. 1H-1H COSY and key HMBC correlations of compounds 14.
Preprints 211856 g004
Figure 5. Experimental and calculated ECD spectra of compounds (A) 1 and (B) 2.
Figure 5. Experimental and calculated ECD spectra of compounds (A) 1 and (B) 2.
Preprints 211856 g005
Figure 6. Key NOESY correlation of compound 2.
Figure 6. Key NOESY correlation of compound 2.
Preprints 211856 g006
Table 1. NMR spectroscopic data of compounds 13 (700 MHz for 1H NMR and 175 MHz for 13C NMR in DMSO-d6).
Table 1. NMR spectroscopic data of compounds 13 (700 MHz for 1H NMR and 175 MHz for 13C NMR in DMSO-d6).
No. 1 2 3
δC, Type δH, Multi. (J in Hz) δC, Type δH, Multi. (J in Hz) δC, Type δH, Multi. (J in Hz)
1 8.12, s, 1-NH 8.05, d (2.4), 1-NH 8.11, s, 1-NH
2 167.9, C 167.0, C 167.0, C
3 53.9, CH 3.78, td (7.1, 3.8) 55.3, CH 4.17, ddt (4.8, 3.6, 2.0) 58.8, CH 3.72, dt (3.6, 1.8)
4 8.12, s, 4-NH 8.12, d (2.4), 4-NH 7.97, s, 4-NH
5 167.9, C 166.2, C 167.9, C
6 53.9, CH 3.78, td (7.1, 3.8) 53.7, CH 3.58, ddd (6.8, 3.7, 2.1) 53.7, CH 3.82, m
7 32.8, CH2 1.69, m 33.0, CH2 1.11, m
0.71, m
33.0, CH2 1.67, ddt (13.3, 10.1, 6.0)
8 21.8, CH2 1.30, m 21.0, CH2 0.71, m 21.9, CH2 1.31, m
9 27.6, CH2 1.58, p (7.5) 27.4, CH2 1.30, m 27.6, CH2 1.59, ddd (12.5, 8.9, 6.4)
10 41.5, CH2 3.45, td (7.0, 2.0) 41.5, CH2 3.27, td (7.1, 3.4) 41.6, CH2 3.45, t (7.2)
11 167.1, C 167.0, C 167.0, C
13 47.9, CH2 4.52, s 48.0, CH2 4.46, s 48.0, CH2 4.51, s
14 153.3, C 153.4, C 153.4, C
15 118.9, C 118.9, C 118.9, C
16 156.5, C 156.5, C 156.5, C
17 103.0, CH 6.82, s 103.0, CH 6.83, s 103.4, CH 6.82, s
18 120.7, C 120.7, C 120.7, C
19 131.9, C 132.0, C 132.0, C
20 58.8, CH3 3.87, s 58.9, CH3 3.87, s 58.9, CH3 3.87, s
21 9.4, CH3 2.05, s 9.4, CH3 2.06, s 9.4, CH3 2.06, s
22 38.2, CH2 3.13, dd (13.5, 3.9)
2.84, dd (13.5, 5.0)
38.0, CH 1.83, ddp (16.7, 7.1, 3.5)
23 136.2, C 24.3, CH2 1.39, dqd (14.0, 7.0, 6.5, 3.8)
24 130.4, CH 7.14, m 15.1, CH3 0.89, d (7.1)
25 128.0, CH 7.22, m 11.9, CH3 0.83, t (7.4)
26 126.7, CH 7.22, m
16-OH 9.77, s 9.78, s 9.77, s
Table 2. NMR spectroscopic data of compound 4 (500 MHz for 1H NMR and 125 MHz for 13C NMR in CD3OD).
Table 2. NMR spectroscopic data of compound 4 (500 MHz for 1H NMR and 125 MHz for 13C NMR in CD3OD).
No. 4
δC, Type δH, Multi. (J in Hz)
1 80.7, CH 5.01, ddd (10.5, 6.7, 3.7)
2 28.5, CH2 3.18, dd (16.7, 3.8)
2.78, dd (16.8, 10.5)
3 125.6, C
4 100.2, C
5 159.1, C
6 101.9, CH 6.27, s
7 155.7, C
8 135.9, C
9 128.0, CH 5.71, dd (15.3, 6.8)
10 135.1, CH 6.38, dd (15.3, 10.4)
11 131.7, CH 6.11, ddd (15.0, 10.4, 1.8)
12 132.9, CH 5.82, dq (14.0, 6.7)
13 18.3, CH3 1.77, dd (6.7, 1.6)
14 171.8, C
Table 3. The DPPH free radical scavenging activities of compounds 110 (μg·mL-1).
Table 3. The DPPH free radical scavenging activities of compounds 110 (μg·mL-1).
Compounds IC50
1 >500
2 >500
3 >500
4 6.01
5 7.00
6 34.99
7 44.94
8 35.14
9 >500
10 >500
Vc 3.10
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated