Submitted:
28 April 2026
Posted:
29 April 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.1.1. Chemical Analyses
2.1.2. Mineralogical Analyses
2.2. Smelting Operations
- Feed section: this domain is endowed with raw material hoppers, conveyor systems, and a mixing bin for charge preparation.
- Furnace section: this zone incorporates a hydraulic electrode-control system, a robust furnace shell lined with refractories, and integrated cooling-water circuits.
- Off-gas handling section:this section is furnished with an off-gas port, dedicated extraction lines, and a baghouse system for effective dust capture and emissions control.
2.2.1. Experimental Framework
3. Results
3.1. Effect of Pre-Reduced Ores Properties
3.1.1. Energy
A. Power Stability Metrics: Arc Stability, Voltage/Current Fluctuations
B. Specific Energy Requirement
C. Furnace Thermal Efficiency
C. Load Factor/Power-on Time
3.1.2. Materials
A. Reductant Efficiency
B. Elemental Accountability
C. Elemental Recovery
D. Elemental Deportment
E. Slag-to-Metal Ratio
3.1.3. Process Sustainability
A. Refractory Consumption
B. Electrode Consumption
3.1.4. Environmental Indicators: CO2-Equivalent Emissions per Ton of Product, Dust and Particulate Emissions, NOx/SOx Emissions
A. Stack Emissions and Atmospheric Pollutants
| Parameter | Units | Value | Uncertainty |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Particulate Matter | mg/Nm3 | 3.5 | ±1.14 mg |
| Average Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) | mg/Nm3 | 0 | ±18.87 ppm (detection limit) |
| Average Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) | mg/Nm3 | 3.49 | ±6.67 ppm |
| Average Carbon Dioxide (CO2) | mg/Nm3 | 775 | N/A (ambient background) |
| Average Oxygen (in stack) | %v/v | 20.8 | ±0.22% |
3.2. Effect of Pre-Reduction Approach
3.2.1. Energy
3.2.1.1. A. Power Stability Metrics: Arc Stability, Voltage/Current Fluctuations
C. Load Factor/Power-on Time
3.2.2. Materials
A. Reductant Efficiency
B. Slag-to-Metal Ratio
3.2.3. Process Sustainability
3.2.3.1. A. Refractory Consumption
4. Discussions
4.1. Effect of Pre-Reduced Ores Properties
4.1.1. Energy
A. Power Stability Metrics: Arc Stability, Voltage/Current Fluctuations
B. Specific Energy Requirement
C. Furnace Thermal Efficiency
D. Load Factor/Power-on Time
4.1.2. Materials
A. Reductant Efficiency
B. Elemental Accountability
C. Elemental Recovery
D. Elemental Deportment
E. Slag-to-Metal Ratio
4.1.3. Process Sustainability
A. Refractory Consumption
B. Electrode Consumption
Environmental Indicators: CO2-Equivalent Emissions per Ton of Product, Dust and Particulate Emissions, NOx/SOx Emissions
4.1.4.1. A. Stack Emissions and Atmospheric Pollutants
B. Greenhouse-Gas Emissions
C. Aggregate Environmental Load
4.2. Effect of Pre-Reduction Approach
4.2.1. Energy
A. Power Stability Metrics: Arc Stability, Voltage/Current Fluctuations
B. Load Factor/Power-on Time
4.2.2. Materials
A. Reductant Efficiency
B. Slag-to-Metal Ratio
- Industrial High Carbon Ferromanganese Production: Conventional industrial HCFeMn production via submerged arc furnaces typically operates with SMRs in the range of 1.0 to 1.6 kg/kg, although values can vary depending on ore quality, furnace type, and operating practices [69]. The HAlMan process, which utilizes smelting-aluminothermic reduction, has been benchmarked for its eco-efficiency against industrial carbothermic HCFeMn production, with positive findings regarding energy consumption and emissions. The reported SMRs in this study, particularly the 1.34 kg/kg for Nchwaning ore (retort packed-bed), fall within or are competitive with the upper end of typical industrial ranges for HCFeMn.
- Aluminothermic Reduction: Aluminothermic processes, by their nature, can generate significant amounts of alumina-rich slag. The specific SMR for smelting-aluminothermic reduction largely depends on the reductant usage, slag former additions, and overall process stoichiometry. Generally, processes aiming for high metal recovery might produce more slag to ensure efficient separation and impurity removal. It is worth noting that the obtained slag byproduct is valuable and consumable and can be utilized for smelter grade alumina production for the primary aluminum production.
- Pre-reduced Ores: The use of pre-reduced manganese ores, as in this study, is expected to reduce the overall slag volume compared to smelting raw ores, as a significant portion of oxygen has already been removed. This should inherently contribute to lower SMRs and improved energy efficiency.
-
Process Economics: A lower SMR leads to several economic advantages:
- Reduced Raw Material Consumption: Less slag formers are required, decreasing raw material costs.
- Lower Energy Demand: Less slag to melt and heat reduces specific energy consumption per unit of metal produced.
- Increased Furnace Productivity: A lower slag volume allows for a higher throughput of metal, improving furnace capacity utilization.
-
Waste Management: Slag generation is a major waste stream in ferroalloy production. A lower SMR translates directly to:
- Reduced Slag Disposal Costs: Significant cost savings on landfilling or further processing of slag.
- Lower Environmental Impact: Minimizing solid waste contributes to a more sustainable operation and addresses increasing regulatory pressures. Studies highlight the importance of characterizing and valorizing metallurgical slags to reduce environmental impact and conserve resources.
-
Pre-reduction approach:
- Nchwaning ore pre-reduced in a packed bed vs. Nchwaning ore pre-reduced in a rotary plasma furnace: The Nchwaning ore pre-reduced in the retort packed bed furnace yielded a lower SMR (1.34 kg/kg) compared to the same ore pre-reduced in the plasma rotary furnace (1.79 kg/kg). This difference could be attributed to variations in the degree of pre-reduction achieved by each method, or differences in the residual gangue composition and morphology after pre-reduction. A more selective or efficient removal of gangue components during pre-reduction in the retort packed-bed could lead to a cleaner feed for the smelting furnace, thus requiring less slag generation.
- UMK: The UMK ore pre-reduced in the retort packed bed furnace resulted in the highest SMR (1.87 kg/kg) among all campaigns. This suggests that the specific characteristics of the UMK ore, even after pre-reduction in the retort, might necessitate a higher slag volume during smelting to achieve desired metal recovery or impurity removal. Ore composition, particularly the ratio of manganese oxides to silica and alumina, heavily influences the required slag volume and composition.
-
Operational Adjustments: While the provided data does not directly detail SER modulation or specific Al additions per tap, these operational parameters are crucial in influencing SMR.
- Aluminium Additions: In smelting-aluminothermic reduction, the amount of aluminium reductant added directly impacts the quantity and composition of the alumina-rich slag formed. Precise control of Al additions is vital to optimize both metal recovery and SMR.
- Slag Chemistry and Basicity: Adjustments to slag chemistry (e.g., lime or silica additions) to achieve optimal basicity and fluidity for efficient metal-slag separation and impurity removal will directly influence the slag volume and, consequently, the SMR. These adjustments are often fine-tuned based on the specific feed material and desired product quality.
4.2.3. Process Sustainability
A. Refractory Consumption
- Ferroalloy Production: While precise, universally comparable figures for refractory consumption in experimental manganese ferroalloy smelting are scarce, general industry benchmarks for EAF operations, particularly those involving aggressive slags, often highlight the challenge of refractory degradation. For example, specific refractory consumption in steelmaking EAFs can range significantly, but typical values are often targeted below 1 kg/tonne steel. Given the nature of manganese alloys and the typically more aggressive slags, these values might be higher for ferroalloy production.
- DC Arc Furnaces: The DC arc furnace used in this study is known for its ability to operate with greater flexibility in terms of raw materials and slag chemistry compared to AC furnaces. However, the intense localized heat and strong stirring action caused by the arc can also contribute to refractory erosion if not properly managed [21]. In ferroalloy furnaces, there is usually a cold burden or frozen slag in contact with the refractory, and therefore much less refractory interaction occurs in comparison with EAF in which molten slag is in contact with molten slag.
- Cost Reduction: A lower refractory consumption rate, as achieved with the Nchwaning ore pre-reduced in a retort packed-bed furnace, translates directly into reduced material costs for refractories and decreased labor costs associated with patching and relining the furnace.
- Increased Furnace Availability: Slower refractory wear extends furnace campaign life, leading to fewer planned and unplanned shutdowns for maintenance. This improves furnace availability and overall productivity, directly impacting the process’s economic performance [67].
- Operational Stability: Consistent and predictable refractory wear contributes to more stable furnace operation, reducing the risk of breakouts or other refractory-related failures.
- Slag Chemistry and Basicity: The most significant factor influencing refractory wear in smelting is the chemical interaction between the molten slag and the refractory lining. Higher slag basicity and the presence of certain aggressive components (e.g., highly oxidizing conditions or specific oxides) can accelerate refractory dissolution. The lower SMR for the Nchwaning ore (retort packed-bed) and its corresponding lower refractory consumption suggest that this combination might have produced a less aggressive slag composition or a more stable slag-refractory interface. The specific composition of the slag (e.g., MgO content, silica content) dictates its corrosivity to MgO-based refractories [21].
B. Electrode Consumption
4.3. Comparative Benchmarking
- Slag volumes: The SMR observed in this study was 1.34 kg/kg and 1.79 kg/kg for the Nchwaning pre-reduced ores in a retort furnace and plasma furnace, respectively. For the UMK ore pres-reduced in the retort furnace, the SMR was observed to be 1.87 kg/kg.
- Emission normalisation and abatement: Pilot stack concentrations indicate low gaseous emissions by concentration, but normalised emissions (kg t−1) are sensitive to assumed flue volumes and capture efficiency. Industrial implementations would need robust abatement and continuous monitoring to ensure compliance and low net emissions after normalisation.
- Operational stability: Measured current/voltage/power deviations (mean deviations ∼10–12%) show room for process-control improvements; stability gains typically reduce electrode/refractory wear and raise delivered power, improving SEC further at scale.
- Economic balance: The pilot energy efficiency indicator (EEI) and cost assessment (CAE) indicator in Section 3.1.1 suggest favourable eco-economic outcomes under the study assumptions (product price, aluminium costs, grid factor). Full techno-economic analysis (including capex, slag conditioning and transport, and regulatory compliance) is required before firm commercial viability claims.
Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Han, Y.; Li, C.; Wang, H. Primary Study on Medium and Low Carbon Ferromanganese Production by Blowing CO2-O2 Mixtures in Converter. Metals 2022, 12, 682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davies, J.; Tangstad, M.; Schanche, T. L.; du Preez, S. P. Pre-reduction of United Manganese of Kalahari Ore in CO/CO2, H2/H2O, and H2 Atmospheres. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2023, 54, 515–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kudyba, A.; Akhtar, S.; Johansen, I.; Safarian, J. Aluminothermic reduction of manganese oxide from selected MnO-containing slags. Materials 2021, 14, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukono, T.; Reiersen, H.S.; Schanche, T.L.; Wallin, M.; Tangstad, M. Prereduction Behavior of Manganese Ores With Solid Carbon and in CO/CO2 Gas Atmosphere. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2022, 53, 3292–3305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukono, T.; Wallin, M.; Tangstad, M. Phase Distribution During Slag Formation in Mn Ferroalloy Production. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2022, 53, 1122–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkar, A.; Schanche, T.L.; Wallin, M.; Safarian, J. Evaluating the Reaction Kinetics on the H2 Reduction of a Manganese Ore at Elevated Temperatures. J. Sustain. Metall. 2024, 10, 2085–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Surup, G.R.; Trubetskaya, A.; Tangstad, M. Life Cycle Assessment of Renewable Reductants in the Ferromanganese Alloy Production: A Review. Processes 2021, 9, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harvey, J.-P.; Courchesne, W.; Vo, M.D.; Oishi, K.; Robelin, C.; Mahue, U.; Leclerc, P.; Al-Haiek, A. Greener reactants, renewable energies and environmental impact mitigation strategies in pyrometallurgical processes: A review. MRS Energy Sustain. 2022, 9, 212–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bajpai, A.; Ratzker, B.; Shankar, S.; Raabe, D.; Ma, Y. Sustainable Pre-reduction of Ferromanganese Oxides with Hydrogen: Heating Rate-Dependent Reduction Pathways and Microstructure Evolution. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2507.10451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Nasser, M.; Kharicha, A.; Barati, H.; Pichler, C.; Hackl, G.; Gruber, M.; Ishmurzin, A.; Redl, C.; Wu, M.; Ludwig, A. Toward a Simplified Arc Impingement Model in a Direct-Current Electric Arc Furnace. Metals 2021, 11, 1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- HAlMan EU Project. Sustainable Hydrogen and Aluminothermic Reduction Process for Manganese . Available online: https://halman-project.eu/ (accessed on 14 April 2026).
- Safarian, J. The Production of Manganese and Its Alloys Through the HAlMan Process. Miner. Met. Mater. Ser. 2023, 749–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moskal, M.; Migas, P.; Karbowniczek, M. Multi-Parameter Characteristics of Electric Arc Furnace Melting. Materials 2022, 15, 1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Logar, V.; Škrjanc, I. The Influence of Electric-Arc-Furnace Input Feeds on its Electrical Energy Consumption. J. Sustain. Metall. 2021, 7, 1013–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernández, J.D.; Onofri, L.; Engell, S. Modeling and Energy Efficiency Analysis of the Steelmaking Process in an Electric Arc Furnace. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2022, 53, 3413–3441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wanjari, A. Methods to optimize energy consumption in Conarc furnaces. SN Appl. Sci. 2021, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ohol, S.M. V. K.; Shinde, S. U.; Balachandran, G. Heat balance analysis in electric arc furnace for process improvement. E3S Web Conf. 2020, 170, 02012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Safarian, J.; Kolstad, H.; Tangstad, M. A sustainable process to produce manganese and its alloys. Processes 2025, 10, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finnholm, T.; Klemettinen, L.; Tammela, J.; Taskinen, P.; O’Brien, H.; Michallik, R.M.; Lindberg, D. Deportment of Minor Elements in Industrial Copper Smelting. JOM 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pankka, I.; Salminen, J.; Taskinen, P.; Lindberg, D. Thermodynamic Modeling of Elemental Distributions of Trace Elements in Non-ferrous Iron Residue Hydrogen Reduction. JOM 2023, 75, 2026–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steenkamp, J.D.; Banda, K.W.; Bezuidenhout, P.J.A.; Denton, G.M. New Laboratory and Pilot Techniques Applied at Mintek in Aid of Furnace Containment System Designs. JOM 2021, 74, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Timoshenko, S.; Gubinski, M.; Niemtsev, E. Energy-efficient solutions of foundry class steelmaking electric arc furnace. Nauk. Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu 2021, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Windsor, R.; Cinelli, M.; Coles, S.R. Comparison of tools for the sustainability assessment of nanomaterials. Curr. Opin. Green. Sustain. Chem. 2018, 12, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mokgosi, M.; Faulds, B.; Dube, J. STACK Emissions Monitoring Report. 2025, July 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Perroy, É.; Lucas, D.; Debusschere, V. Provision of Frequency Containment Reserve Through Large Industrial End-Users Pooling. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2019, 11, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kleimt, B.; Krieger, W.; Mier Vasallo, D.; Arteaga Ayarza, A.; Unamuno, I. Model-Based Decision Support System for Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) Online Monitoring and Control. Metals 2023, 13, 1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mauer, G. Multiple Electrodes and Cascaded Nozzles: A Review of the Evolution of Modern Plasma Spray Torches. J. Therm. Spray. Technol. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, R.T.; Reynolds, Q.G.; Alport, M.J. DC arc photography and modelling. Miner. Eng. 2002, 15, 985–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mironov, Y.M. Effect of arcing on the electrical parameters and the technical-and-economic indices of an arc furnace. Russ. Metall. (Metally) 2019, 2019, 1238–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paranchuk, Y.; Lis, M. Double-circuit adaptive system of fuzzy phase-autonomous and energy-efficient control of arc furnace electric modes. Energies 2023, 16, 5350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bergman, K.; Kjellberg, B. DC arc furnace technology applied to smelting applications; 2001; pp. 80–89. [Google Scholar]
- Guerra-Serrano, J.; Sánchez Roca, Á.; González-Yero, G.; Sánchez Orozco, M.C.; Pérez, M.; Jiménez Macías, E.; Blanco-Fernández, J. New arc stability index for industrial AC three-phase electric arc furnaces based on acoustic signals. Sensors 2020, 20, 6840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Trembach, B.; Silchenko, Y.; Sukov, M.; Sadovyi, K.; Knyazev, S.A.; Krbata, M.; Balenko, O.; Kniazieva, H.; Kabatskyi, O. Investigation of the arc stability during self-shielded flux-coated arc welding with exothermic additions. Res. Sq. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blažič, A.; Škrjanc, I.; Logar, V. Arc Quality Index Based on Three-Phase Cassie–Mayr Electric Arc Model of Electric Arc Furnace. Metals 2024, 14, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narzullayev, B.; Eshmirzaev, M.A. Causes of the appearance of current waves in high voltage electric arc furnaces, and methods of their reduction. E3S Web Conf. 2023, 417, 3003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fleuriault, C.; Grogan, J.; White, J. Electric arc smelting: Fleuriault, Grogan, and White. JOM 2019, 71, 321–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xi, X.; Li, S.; Li, C.; Pan, H.; Wang, J.; Zhu, R. Research on technical parameters of electrical arc furnace steelmaking based on direct reduced iron as raw material. Ironmak. Steelmak. Process. Prod. Appl. 2024, 51, 947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gregurek, D.; Peng, Z.; Wenzl, C.; White, J. F. Fe alloys: Production and metallurgical aspects: Part II. JOM 2016, 69, 323–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukono, T.; Gjøvik, J. E.; Gärtner, H.; Wallin, M.; Ringdalen, E.; Tangstad, M. Extent of ore prereduction in pilot-scale production of high carbon ferromanganese. SSRN Electron. J. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Randhawa, N. S.; Minj, R. K.; Kumar, K. Eco-friendly low-carbon manganese ferroalloy production for cleaner steel technologies. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2024, 21, 100784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hockaday, L.; Dinter, F.; Reynolds, Q. G. The thermal decomposition kinetics of carbonaceous and ferruginous manganese ores in atmospheric conditions. J. South. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 2023, 123, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P.; Safarian, J. Effect of pre-reduction of manganese ore by hydrogen on its smelting behavior and interaction with stable oxides. J. Sustain. Metall. 2025, 11, 2980–3000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kar, M. K.; Safarian, J. Studying the alkaline leachability of calcium aluminate slag produced from aluminothermic reduction of a hydrogen reduced manganese ore. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 382, 135878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, D.; Wang, Y.; Di, Y.; Peng, J.; Feng, N. Factors affecting reduction efficiency in industrial retorts for Mg production by aluminothermic process. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2024, 34, 1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boldrini, A.; Koolen, D.; Crijns-Graus, W.; Worrell, E.; van den Broek, M. Flexibility options in a decarbonising iron and steel industry. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023, 189, 113988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, R.; Liu, L.; Zhang, L.; Sun, J.; Shi, Y.; Yu, B. Effect of squeeze casting on microstructure and mechanical properties of hypereutectic Al–xSi alloys. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2017, 33, 404–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rimal, V.; Tangstad, M. Kinetics of manganese reduction comparing synthetic slags and ores for ferromanganese production. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2025, 56, 2731–2747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P.; Safarian, J. Aluminothermic Reduction of HCFeMn Slag and Hydrogen Based Pre-reduced Mn Ore. HAlMan Bi-Annu. Meet. WP 3-Task 3.2 Prog. Rep. unpublished. 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed, A.; Halfa, H.; El-Fawakhry, M. K.; El-Faramawy, H.; Eissa, M. Parameters Affecting Energy Consumption for Producing High Carbon Ferromanganese in a Closed Submerged Arc Furnace. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2014, 21, 666–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vasebi, A.; Poulin, É.; Hodouin, D. Selecting proper uncertainty model for steady-state data reconciliation – Application to mineral and metal processing industries. Miner. Eng. 2014, 65, 130–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bascur, O.A.; Linares, R. Solving Metal Losses Problems: Metallurgical Mass Balances. IFAC Proc. Vol. 2004(37), 143–148. [CrossRef]
- Teixeira, P.; Lopes, H.; Gulyurtlu, I.; Lapa, N. Uncertainty estimation to evaluate mass balances on a combustion system. Accred. Qual. Assur. 2012, 17, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subasinghe, G.K.N.S. A transparent technique for mass balancing and data adjustment of complex metallurgical circuits. Miner. Process. Extr. Met. Trans. I.M.M. Sect. C 2009, 118, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arzpeyma, N.; Alam, M.; Gyllenram, R.; Jönsson, P.G. Model Development to Study Uncertainties in Electric Arc Furnace Plants to Improve Their Economic and Environmental Performance. Metals 2021, 11, 892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kudyba, A.; Safarian, J. Manganese and Aluminium Recovery from Ferromanganese Slag and Al White Dross by a High Temperature Smelting-Reduction Process. Materials 2022, 15, 2907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.; Moosavi-Khoonsari, E.; Kero, I.; Tranell, G. Element Distribution in the Silicomanganese Production Process. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2018, 49, 2444–2457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tangstad, M.; Bublik, S.; Haghdani, S.; Einarsrud, K.E.; Tang, K. Slag Properties in the Primary Production Process of Mn-Ferroalloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2021, 52, 3688–3707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eissa, M.; El-Faramawy, H.; Farid, G. Production of high carbon ferromanganese using manganese rich slag in the charge. Steel Res. 1998, 69, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eissa, M.; El-Faramawy, H.; Ahmed, A.; Nabil, S.; Halfa, H. Parameters Affecting the Production of High Carbon Ferromanganese in Closed Submerged Arc Furnace. J. Miner. Mater. Charact. Eng. 2012, 11, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, W.; Samuelsson, P.; Jönsson, P.G.; Gyllenram, R.; Glaser, B. Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of High-Carbon Ferrochrome Production. JOM 2023, 75, 1206–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edwards, L.; Hunt, M.; Weyell, P.; Nord, J.A.; Côté, J.; Coulombe, P.; Morais, N. Quantifying the Carbon Footprint of the Alouette Primary Aluminum Smelter. JOM 2022, 74, 4909–4919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acheampong, T.; Tyce, M. Navigating the energy transition and industrial decarbonisation: Ghana’s latest bid to develop an integrated bauxite-to-aluminium industry. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2023, 107, 103337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leme, R.D.; Nunes, A.O.; Costa, L.B.M.; Silva, D.A.L. Creating value with less impact: Lean, green and eco-efficiency in a metalworking industry towards a cleaner production. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 196, 517–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Berkel, R. Eco-efficiency in the Australian minerals processing sector. J. Clean. Prod. 2006, 15, 772–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trembach, B.; Silchenko, Y.; Sukov, M.; Sadovyi, K.; Knyazev, S.A.; Krbata, M.; Balenko, O.; Kniazieva, H.; Kabatskyi, O. Investigation of the arc stability during self-shielded flux-coated arc welding with exothermic additions. Res. Sq. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blažič, A.; Škrjanc, I.; Logar, V. Arc Quality Index Based on Three-Phase Cassie–Mayr Electric Arc Model of Electric Arc Furnace. Metals 2024, 14, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spooner, M.P. Methods and Tools for the Statistical Data Analysis of Large Datasets Collected from Bio-Based Manufacturing Processes; Technical University of Denmark: Denmark, 2018; p. 152. Available online: https://local.forskningsportal.dk/local/dki-cgi/ws/cris-link?src=dtu&id=dtu-c044b23c-a1c1-4a9c-a2cd-bac25ea815a4&ti=Methods%20and%20tools%20for%20the%20statistical%20data%20analysis%20of%20large%20datasets%20collected%20from%20bio-based%20manufacturing%20processes (accessed on 15 February 2026).
- Yang, Y.; Loxton, R.; Rohl, A.L.; Bùi, H.T. Long-term maintenance optimization for integrated mining operations. Optim. Eng. 2023, 25, 1817–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kero, I.; Eidem, P.A.; Ma, Y.; Indresand, H.; Aarhaug, T.A.; Grådahl, S. Airborne Emissions from Mn Ferroalloy Production. JOM 2018, 71, 349–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trejo, E.; Martell, F.; Micheloud, O.; Teng, L.; Llamas, A.; Montesinos-Castellanos, A. A novel estimation of electrical and cooling losses in electric arc furnaces. Energy 2012, 42(1), 446–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oterdoom, H.; Reuter, M.; Zietsman, J. DC Ferrochrome Smelting: The Arcing Zone and Its Influence on Energy Transport and Exergy Dissipation. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2024, 56, 890–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, K.; Chen, L.; Wu, Y. CFD simulation of high-temperature DC arc furnace for manganese alloys. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2020, 174, 115110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhdanov, A.V.; Zhuchkov, V.I.; Dashevskiy, V.Ya.; Leontyev, L.I. Wastes generation and use in ferroalloy production. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Ferroalloys Congress, 2015; pp. 754–758. [Google Scholar]
- Holappa, L.; Xiao, Y. Slags in ferroalloys production—review of present knowledge. In Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy; Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2004; Volume 104, 7, pp. 429–437. [Google Scholar]
- Digernes, M. N.; Rudi, L.; Andersson, H.; Stålhane, M.; Wasbo, S. O.; Knudsen, B. R. Global optimisation of multi-plant manganese alloy production. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2018, 116, 138–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buruiana, D. L.; Obreja, C.; Herbei, E. E.; Ghisman, V. Re-Use of Silico-Manganese Slag. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayala, J.; Fernández, B. Recovery of manganese from silicomanganese slag by means of a hydrometallurgical process. Hydrometallurgy 2015, 158, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

















| CaO | MgO | MnO | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMK pre-reduced in VRF | 0.33 | 16.54 | 9.73 | 3.70 | 54.90 | 5.65 |
| N-Ore pre-reduced in a PRK | 0.41 | 8.17 | 18.21 | 1.54 | 66.78 | 2.95 |
| N-Ore pre-reduced in a VRF | 0.31 | 7.43 | 15.89 | 1.58 | 62.78 | 3.70 |
| Lime | 0.30 | 91.93 | 0.30 | <0.005 | 0.90 | 1.99 |
| Al | Si | Cu | Zn | Fe | Mn | Mg | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aluminium dross | 92.50 | 3.00 | 1.70 | 1.40 | 0.80 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| Condition | Tap No | SER | Power | Heatloss | Feedrate | Tap Time | Pre-reduced N-ore | % Al & CaO addition | Al & CaO masses, kg | Process and operational changes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (kWh/kg) | (kW) | (kW) | (kg/h) | (h) | Mintek (kg) | SINTEF (kg) | Lime | Al metal | Lime | Al metal | |||
| 6 | 21–23 | 0.95 | 130 | 70 | 63.35 | 2.41 | 100 | 0.00 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 26.70 | 26.00 | New feed material. Transition and stabilisation condition. |
| 7 | 24–26 | 0.85 | 130 | 70 | 70.84 | 2.16 | 0.00 | 100 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 26.70 | 26.00 | New feed material. Reduced SER due to high slag temperature. Reduced SER due to high slag temperature. Reduced SER due to high slag temperature. |
| 8 | 27–29 | 0.85 | 130 | 70 | 92.74 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 100 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 26.70 | 28.60 | Increased Al addition to reach MnO target in slag. Increased SER to increase the slag temperature. |
| 9 | 30–36 | 0.80 | 130 | 70 | 75.00 | 2.16 | 0.00 | 100 | 0.30 | 0.32 | 30.00 | 32.00 | Increase lime to 30% and Al to 32%, and the SER to 0.800. |
| Condition | Tap No. | SER | Power | Power Density | Voltage | Heatloss | Feedrate | Time | Pre-reduced Ore, kg | % Al & CaO Addition | Al & CaO Masses, kg | Process and operational changes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (kWh/kg) | (kW) | (kW/m2) | (V) | (kW) | (kg/h) | (h) | UMK | N-ore | Al | Lime | Al | Lime | |||
| Warm-up | 0 | 12.00 | |||||||||||||
| 1 | 1–5 | 0.80 | 130 | 260 | 70 | 70 | 75 | 2.22 | 100 | 0.09 | 0.20 | 9 | 20 | Thermal and chemical stabilisation condition. Drop voltage to 70V in next tap. Increased SER, and lime and Al additions. | |
| 2 | 6–8 | 1.00 | 130 | 260 | 70 | 70 | 60 | 3.27 | 100 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 34 | 32 | Changed Al and CaO addition as well as SER. | |
| 3 | 9–11 | 1.00 | 130 | 260 | 70 | 70 | 60 | 3.27 | 100 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 34 | 32 | Increased voltage to 90 V. | |
| 4 | 12–15 | 1.00 | 150 | 300 | 100 | 70 | 80 | 2.58 | 100 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 34 | 32 | Increased power to 150 kW and voltage to 100 V. Tap metal, approx. half a ladle, stop when there is slag. Drain furnace to prepare for ore change. | |
| 5 | 16–18 | 1.00 | 130 | 260 | 100 | 70 | 60 | 3.27 | 100 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 34 | 32 | Slag was not tapped in order to rebuild buffer slag in furnace. Chemical stabilisation condition of new Mn ore. Drop voltage to 90V to lower shell temperatures. | |
| 6 | 19–21 | 1.05 | 130 | 260 | 90 | 70 | 57 | 3.48 | 100 | 0.36 | 0.34 | 36 | 34 | Increase Al, lime, and SER. | |
| 7 | 22–24 | 1.15 | 130 | 260 | 90 | 70 | 52 | 3.91 | 100 | 0.40 | 0.38 | 40 | 38 | Increase Al, lime, and SER. | |
| 8 | 25–27 | 1.15 | 150 | 300 | 100 | 70 | 70 | 3.06 | 100 | 0.40 | 0.38 | 40 | 38 | Increased power, voltage, and SER. | |
| 9 | 28–30 | 1.15 | 150 | 300 | 100 | 70 | 70 | 3.06 | 100 | 0.40 | 0.38 | 40 | 38 | Maintain power, voltage, and SER. | |
| Ore Type | (h) | (h) | (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| UMK retort packed bed furnace | 48.50 | 2.08 | 95.89 |
| Nchwaning retort packed bed furnace | 50.55 | 1.62 | 96.89 |
| Ore | Total Slag (kg) | Total Metal (kg) | Overall Slag-to-Metal Ratio (kg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| UMK | 1015 | 543 | 1.87 |
| Nchwaning | 944.33 | 704 | 1.34 |
| Ore | MgO Consumed (kg) | Metal Produced (kg) | Refractory Consumption Rate (kg MgO/kg metal) |
|---|---|---|---|
| UMK retort packed bed furnace | 99.28 | 543 | 0.1828 |
| Nchwaning retort packed bed furnace | 74.03 | 704 | 0.1051 |
| Ore | Pre-reduction | Mass Electrode Consumed (kg) | Mass Metal Produced (kg) | Electrode Consumption Rate (kg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMK | Retort packed bed furnace | 60 | 543 | 0.1105 |
| Nchwaning | Retort packed bed furnace | 1 | 704 | 0.0014 |
| Pre-reduction approach | (h) | (h) | (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nchwaning plasma rotary furnace | 42.74 | 1.37 | 96.89 |
| Nchwaning retort packed bed furnace | 50.55 | 1.62 | 96.89 |
| Pre-reduction approach | Total Slag (kg) | Total Metal (kg) | Overall Slag-to-Metal Ratio (kg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rotary Plasma Furnace | 1143 | 638 | 1.79 |
| Vertical Retort Furnace | 944.33 | 704 | 1.34 |
| Pre-reduction approach | MgO Consumed (kg) | Metal Produced (kg) | Refractory Consumption Rate (kg MgO/kg metal) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rotary Plasma Furnace | 117.27 | 638 | 0.1838 |
| Vertical Retort Furnace | 74.03 | 704 | 0.1051 |
| Metric | Units | 200 kW (this study) | Industrial relevance / Typical range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Specific Energy Consumption (SEC) | kWh t−1 product | ≈880 (0.88 MWh/t) | Typical SAF HCFeMn: 2,000–3,500 kWh t−1 (2.0–3.5 MWh/t) [5,6]. |
| Energy Utilization | % | ≈46.8% (mean; 40–57%) | EAF/EAF-like systems: 40–70% depending on design and heat integration [70,71]. |
| Power Stability / Arc Control | Dimensionless indices | , , | Industrial DC furnaces aim for minimal current and voltage deviation; modern systems achieve superior stability with advanced controls [15]. |
| CO2-equivalent Emissions | t CO2-eq t−1 product | ≈1.35 (including Al embodied CO2) | Carbothermic HCFeMn: ∼3.0–4.0 t CO2-eq t−1; varies with grid mix and reductant [7,60]. |
| Stack Gas Composition | mg Nm−3 (measured) | PM: 216.8; SO2: 6.84; NOx: 0.02; CO: 2.81; O2: 20.9% | Typical SAF stack emissions depend on abatement; conventional processes show higher PM and SOx levels. |
| Dust / Particulate Emissions | kg t−1 product | ∼26 (normalised) | Industrial HCFeMn operations: 1–3 kg t−1 after abatement [7]. |
| Metallurgical Yield / Recovery (Fe, Mn) | % | Fe: >90%; Mn: 47–80% (improving with tap number) | Industrial operations: 85–95% (ore-based); pilot trend approaches industrial range [58,72]. |
| Slag-to-Metal Ratio (SMR) | kg slag kg−1 metal | 1.34–1.87 | Conventional HCFeMn: 0.5–1.5 [73,74,75]. |
| Refractory Consumption | kg t−1 product | Not quantified (pilot-scale) | Industrial: strongly dependent on furnace design and lining composition. |
| Electrode Consumption | kg t−1 product | Not quantified (pilot; qualitative) | Modern EAF fleets: ∼1–3 kg t−1. |
| Slag Valorisation Rate | % reused | Potentially high-low-Mn slag suitable for cementitious or aggregate use. As part of the HAlMan project, pilot and lab-scale investigation are currently underway with upto 86 % alumina recovery reported. | Industrial reuse depends on composition and leachability; FeMn/SiMn slags often reused [76,77]. |
| Water Consumption & Recycling | m3 t−1 product | Not normalised (pilot) | Conventional plants employ closed-loop cooling; footprints vary by scale. |
| Operating Cost (indicative) | USD t−1 product | ∼1,400 (electricity + Al + labour) | Highly site-specific; depends on reductant and power costs. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).