Submitted:
28 April 2026
Posted:
29 April 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Statement of the Research Problem
3. Research Objectives
- ➢ To identify and analyze the key AI-driven features in Bangladeshi e-banking and evaluate their direct influence on consumer decision-making processes.
- ➢ To examine the impact of perceived ethical attributes of AI (transparency, fairness, data privacy) on building and sustaining ethical trust among Bangladeshi e-banking users.
- ➢ To assess the efficacy of AI-based fraud prevention systems from both a technical and user-perception standpoint in the Bangladeshi context.
- ➢ To develop and empirically test an integrated model elucidating the interrelationships between AI-influenced decision-making, ethical trust, and fraud prevention.
4. Significance of the Study
5. Literature Review
| Phase | 2019-2021(Pre- Pandemic) |
2022-2023 (Emerging AI Era) |
2024 (Current Integration) |
2025 (future Smart B.) |
Focus |
| Global AI Banking | Basic AI Chatbots Simple Automation |
Advanced ML Fraud Detection Personalization |
Explainable AI (XAI) AI Ethics Frameworks |
Quantum Safe AI Integration |
Techno logical Advance ment |
| Bangladesh Context |
MFS Expansion Digital Payment Awareness |
Initial AI Pilot Projects Rising Fraud Concerns |
Regulatory Sandbox Launch Islami FinTech AI Solutions |
Integrated AI Ecosystem Cross border AI Compliance | Context Specific Development |
| Research Focus | Technology Acceptance Models Basic Security Concerns |
Behavioral Economics of Trust Security Privacy Trade-offs |
Ethical AI & Trust Models Multi -Dimensional Decision- Making |
Holistic Integration Models AI Governance Frameworks |
Academic Progress |
| Sub-Theme | Key Findings (2024) | Research Gaps | Bangladesh Relevance |
| AI Service Quality | • Emotion AI achieves 89% customer satisfaction (Deloitte, 2024) • Hyper-personalization increases retention by 35% (McKinsey, 2024) • Conversational AI handles 70% of routine queries (Gartner, 2024) |
• Cultural adaptation of AI interfaces • Rural-urban digital divide • Language-specific NLP challenges |
• Bangla NLP still at 75% accuracy (BracU, 2024) • Mobile-first AI design essential • Islamic banking AI needs special models |
| AI Fraud Prevention | • ML models detect 99.7% fraud in real-time (IBM, 2024) • Behavioral biometrics reduce false positives by 60% (Juniper, 2024) • Blockchain-AI integration enhances audit trails (World Bank, 2024) |
• Privacy-preserving AI techniques • Cross-border fraud coordination • Explainability vs. accuracy trade-off |
• Bangladesh-specific fraud patterns differ • Regulatory compliance with BB guidelines • Agent banking vulnerabilities |
| Ethical AI Frameworks | • EU AI Act (2024) mandates transparency • Singapore's FEAT principles adopted widely • Algorithmic bias detection tools mature (MIT, 2024) |
• Global South ethical frameworks lacking • Cultural definitions of fairness • Accountability mechanisms |
• Bangladesh Bank developing AI governance (2025) • Shariah-compliance requirements • Data sovereignty concerns |
| Sub-Theme | Key Findings (2024) | Research Gaps | Theoretical Implications |
| Digital Infrastructure | • 4G coverage reaches 95% (BTRC, 2024) • Mobile banking users: 65 million (BB, 2024) • AI investment by banks: $68M (2023-2024) |
• AI integration with legacy systems • Rural connectivity challenges • Skilled workforce shortage |
• Modified UTAUT for low-literacy users • Trust transfer from agents to AI • Digital ecosystem theory |
| Regulatory Landscape | • BB Cybersecurity Guidelines (2024) • Data Protection Act under review • FinTech sandbox expanded (2024) |
• AI-specific regulations absent • Cross-border data flow issues • Enforcement capacity gaps |
• Institutional theory application • Regulatory trust development • Compliance-technology alignment |
| Consumer Behavior | • 58% trust AI for fraud prevention (SUST, 2024) • 42% concerned about AI bias (DU, 2024) • Generation Z adoption rate: 76% (NSU, 2024) |
• Trust building mechanisms • Risk perception variations • Cultural decision-making factors |
• Protection Motivation Theory adaptation • Behavioral economics integration • Cross-generational models |
| Trust Dimension | Global Advances (2024) | Bangladesh-Specific Factors | Measurement Challenges |
| Algorithmic Trust | • XAI adoption increases transparency • AI certification programs emerge • Performance metrics standardization |
• Low algorithmic literacy • Preference for human backup • Social proof influence |
• Quantifying trust in black-box systems • Longitudinal trust measurement • Context-specific trust indicators |
| Institutional Trust | • Central bank digital currencies build trust • Regulatory sandboxes foster innovation • Public-private partnerships expand |
• High trust in Bangladesh Bank • Brand loyalty to established banks • Family recommendations influence |
• Separating brand trust from AI trust • Regulatory credibility measurement • Trust transfer mechanisms |
| Transactional Trust | • Real-time verification increases confidence • Smart contracts automate trust • Multi-factor authentication evolution |
• Cash-based mentality persists • Agent mediation effects • Community validation importance |
• Momentary vs. sustained trust • Risk perception calibration • Trust recovery after breaches |
5.1. Artificial Intelligence:
5.2. Customer Experience
5.4. Process Automation
5.5. Financial Inclusion & Accessibility
5.6. Regulatory Compliance
5.7. Ethical Trust
5.7.1. AI-Driven Transparency
5.7.2. Algorithmic Fairness
5.7.3. Data Privacy & Security
5.7.4. Reliability & Accountability
5.7.5. Digital Inclusion
5.8. Fraud Prevention:
5.9. Consumer Decision-Making:
5.10. Research Gaps
5.10.1. Contextual Gap
5.10.2. Ethical-Trust Gap
5.10.3. Efficacy-Perception Gap in Fraud Prevention
5.10.4. Integrated Triad Gap
| Research Gap Focus | Authors (Examples) | Independent Variable (IV) | Dependent Variable (DV) | Specific Gap Identified |
| Contextual Gap | Khan & Patel (2023); Ghosh & Rahman (2024); Hossain et al. (2024); Bangladesh Bank (2024) | AI Implementation (Chatbots, Recommendation Engines) | Consumer Decision-Making; Adoption Intention | Existing models from developed economies fail to account for Bangladesh’s unique socio-cultural and infrastructural factors. |
| Ethical-Trust Gap | Siddique & Haque (2024); Hoque & Mohammad (2025); Beke et al. (2024); Alam & Chowdhury (2025) | AI's Perceived Ethicality (Transparency, Fairness, Data Privacy) | Ethical Trust; System Adoption; Customer Loyalty | Limited empirical evidence on how Bangladeshi consumers perceive ethical dimensions of AI; the link to trust is underexplored. |
| Efficacy-Perception Gap in Fraud Prevention | Chen & Wang (2023); Rahman & Kaiser, (2025); Kabir & Jahan (2023); Ahmed & Islam (2024) | AI-driven Fraud Prevention Systems (Real-time Transaction Monitoring) | Perceived Security; Actual Fraud Reduction; User Inconvenience | Disconnect between AI technical efficacy and user perception; transparency issues affect trust and adoption. |
| Integrated Triad Gap | This study aims to fill this overarching gap | AI Implementation & its Ethical Attributes | Decision-Making, Ethical Trust, Fraud Prevention | Literature treats these constructs separately; dynamic interactions between them remain unexamined. |
6. Methodology of the Study
6.1. Literature Search and Selection
6.2. Data Collection and Archival Design
6.3. Data Analysis and Synthesis
- “Artificial Intelligence AND Digital Banking”
- “Ethical Trust AND AI Banking”
- “Fraud Prevention AND AI”
- “Consumer Decision-Making AND FinTech”
6.4. Conceptual Framework Development
- IVs: AI Adoption (Customer Experience, Risk Management, Process Automation, Financial Inclusion, Regulatory Compliance); Ethical Trust (Transparency, Fairness, Data Privacy, Reliability, Digital Inclusion)
- Mediator: Fraud Prevention (real-time monitoring, secure authentication)
- DV: Consumer Decision-Making (adoption intention, usage behavior, trust, satisfaction)
- Theoretical Basis: UTAUT2 explains adoption behavior, while ethical trust constructs capture consumer confidence and decision-making.
6.5. Ethical Considerations
- No primary data collected
- Only publicly available literature and reports used
- All sources cited properly (APA 7th edition)
7. Conceptual Framework

8. Theoretical Support
9. Discussion and Implications
- Theoretical: Extends UTAUT2 by incorporating ethical trust and fraud prevention, advancing understanding of AI adoption under socio-cultural constraints.
- Practical: Banks should prioritize AI personalization, transparency, and robust fraud systems. Regulators must enforce ethical AI governance. Technology providers should focus on explainable AI and inclusive interfaces. Awareness programs can empower consumers.
- Policy/Strategic: Align AI adoption with local contexts, promote cross-sector collaboration, and integrate ethical AI with fraud prevention to strengthen consumer confidence and digital ecosystem resilience.
- ➢ Empirically validate the proposed framework using survey-based quantitative studies with 300+ Bangladeshi bank customers across urban and rural areas, employing stratified random sampling.
- ➢ Conduct multi-group analysis to examine cross-generational (Gen Z vs. Millennials vs. Gen X) and rural-urban adoption dynamics, as well as gender-based differences.
- ➢ Employ longitudinal designs to examine how AI-driven trust and fraud prevention effectiveness evolve over time, particularly after major security incidents or policy changes.
- ➢ Test the moderating role of Shariah compliance and Bangla NLP accuracy using structural equation modeling (SEM) or partial least squares (PLS).
- ➢ Compare Bangladesh-specific AI adoption patterns with other South Asian emerging economies (India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka) to identify region-specific versus universal factors.
- ➢ Conduct a quantitative meta-analysis to statistically synthesize effect sizes from existing AI adoption studies in emerging economy banking contexts.
References
- Ahmed, N.; Islam, F. Real-time AI fraud prevention and user trust in digital banking. J. Digit. Bank. 2024, 11(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar]
- Alalwan, A.; Dwivedi, Y.; Rana, N.; Williams, M. Consumer adoption of mobile banking in Jordan: Examining the role of usefulness, ease of use, perceived risk, and self-efficacy. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2016, 29(1), 118–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alam, N.; Chowdhury, S. AI ethics and consumer trust in FinTech. J. Emerg. Financ. Technol. 2025, 12(3), 101–118. [Google Scholar]
- Appachikumar, A. K. Predictive banking: Leveraging AI to forecast consumer financial behavior. Adv. Consum. Res. 2025, 2(4), 247–254. [Google Scholar]
- Bangladesh Bank. AI policy and digital banking readiness in Bangladesh; Bangladesh Bank: Dhaka, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Bangladesh Bank. Online fraud prevention circular. 2025. Available online: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/sadaf-islam_bangladesh-bank-through-its-payment-systems-activity-7333814415814803456-0Wys.
- Bashir, M. A.; Haque, M. A.; Salamzadeh, A.; Rahman, M. M. Customers’ satisfaction of e-banking in Bangladesh: Do service quality and customers’ experiences matter? FinTech 2023, 2(3), 657–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beke, L.; Smith, J.; Tran, P. Trust dynamics in AI-enabled banking. Int. J. Bank. Technol. 2024, 18(1), 45–60. [Google Scholar]
- Bhuiyan, M. R. I.; Husain, T.; Islam, S.; Amin, A. Exploring the prospective influence of artificial intelligence on the health sector in Bangladesh: a study on awareness, perception and adoption. Health Educ. 2025, 125(3), 279–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Wang, X. AI in fraud prevention: Implications for consumer trust. J. Financ. Innov. 2023, 7(3), 22–38. [Google Scholar]
- Davenport, T. H.; Ronanki, R. Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2018, 96(1), 108–116. [Google Scholar]
- Ghosh, S.; Rahman, F. Cultural and socio-economic factors influencing AI adoption in Bangladesh. Asian J. FinTech 2024, 5(2), 101–118. [Google Scholar]
- Hassan, M.; Aziz, L. A. R.; Andriansyah, Y. The role of artificial intelligence in modern banking: An exploration of AI-driven approaches for enhanced fraud prevention, risk management, and regulatory compliance. Rev. Contemp. Bus. Anal. 2023, 6(1), 110–132. [Google Scholar]
- Hoque, M. A.; Mahmood, R.; Ali, R.; Rosli, N. S.; Hossain, M. M. Drivers of AI adoption in banks in Bangladesh: Moderating role of technology readiness. ICRRD J. 2025, 6(4). Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/396668418_Drivers_of_AI_Adoption_of_Banks_in_Bangladesh_Moderating_Role_of_Technology_Readiness. [CrossRef]
- Hoque, M.; Mohammad, A. Ethical AI perceptions in emerging economies: A Bangladeshi perspective. J. Digit. Ethics 2025, 6(1), 55–72. [Google Scholar]
- Hossain, M.; Alam, S.; Iqbal, A. Opportunities and vulnerabilities of AI in automating compliance and regulatory reporting in the banking sector in Bangladesh. ResearchGate. 2025. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/397497198_Opportunities_and_Vulnerabilities_of_AI_in_Automating_Compliance_and_Regulatory_Reporting_in_the_Banking_Sector_in_Bangladesh.
- Ikhsan, M. R.; Lakulu, M. M.; Pannesai, I. Y.; Rizali, M.; Nugraha, B.; Swastina, L. Systematic review of artificial intelligence applications in predicting solar photovoltaic power production efficiency. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. (IJECE) 2026, 16(1), 463–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, F.; Mayeesha, T. T.; Ahmed, N. Know Your Users: Towards Explainable AI in Bangladesh. Companion of the 2024 on ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 2024; pp. 890–893. [Google Scholar]
- Islam, M. S.; Rahman, N. AI-driven fraud detections in financial institutions: A comprehensive study. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. Stud. 2025, 7(1), 100–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karim, M. R.; Islam, T.; Shajalal, M.; Beyan, O.; Lange, C.; Cochez, M.; Decker, S. Explainable AI for bioinformatics: methods, tools and applications. Brief. Bioinform. 2023, 24(5), bbad236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khaleduzzaman, M.; Hera, T. Enhancing fraud detection in Bangladeshi banks through forensic accounting tools. World J. Adv. Eng. Technol. Sci. 2024, 12(3), 77–89. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, A.; Roy, B. K. S.; Sarker, A.; Abedin, S. N.; Islam, M. M.; Zaber, M. AI-Driven Cybersecurity Challenges in Bangladesh’s Banking Industry. J. Comput. Commun. 2025, 13(11), 223–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, V.; Sharma, A.; Gupta, R. Personalization in digital banking: impact on customer decision-making. Int. J. Bank. Mark. 2019, 37(5), 1234–1256. [Google Scholar]
- Lukyanenko, R.; Maass, W.; Storey, V. C. Trust in artificial intelligence: From a Foundational Trust Framework to emerging research opportunities. Electron. Mark. 2022, 32(4), 1993–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayeesha, T. T.; Islam, F.; Ahmed, N. Ethical AI adoption in digital banking: Transparency and trust in Bangladesh. J. Digit. Bank. Financ. Serv. 2024, 12(3), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayer, R. C.; Davis, J. H.; Schoorman, F. D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1995, 20(3), 709–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikalef, P.; Gupta, M. Ethical AI in financial services: fairness, transparency, and trust. J. Bus. Ethics 2021, 171(4), 675–693. [Google Scholar]
- Mollik, E.; Majeed, F. Enhancing data security and privacy for AI-based banking services. J. Bank. Technol. Innov. 2025, 9(2), 101–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mumtaz, S.; Carmichael, J.; Weiss, M.; Nimon-Peters, A. Ethical use of artificial intelligence-based tools in higher education: are future business leaders ready? Educ. Inf. Technol. 2025, 30(6), 7293–7319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munira, M. S. K.; Juthi, S.; Begum, A. Artificial intelligence in financial customer relationship management: A systematic review of AI-driven strategies in banking and FinTech. Am. J. Adv. Technol. Eng. Solut. 2025, 1(01), 20–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nastoska, A.; Jancheska, B.; Rizinski, M.; Trajanov, D. Evaluating trustworthiness in AI: Risks, metrics, and applications across industries. Electronics 2025, 14(13), 2717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ngai, E. W. T.; Xiu, L.; Chau, D. C. K. Application of data mining techniques in financial fraud detection: A classification framework and an academic review of literature. Decis. Support Syst. 2011, 50(3), 559–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nnaomah, U. I.; Odejide, O. A.; Aderemi, S.; Olutimehin, D. O.; Abaku, E. A.; Orieno, O. H. AI in risk management: An analytical comparison between the US and Nigerian banking sectors. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. Arch. 2024, 6(1), 127–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nobel, A.; Rahman, M.; Chowdhury, S. Machine learning and explainable AI for fraud detection in banking systems. Information 2024, 15(6), 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Odufisan, O.; Bello, H. A.; Roberts, J. Real-time anomaly detection in e-banking transactions: A machine learning approach. J. Cybersecur. Financ. Stab. 2025, 4(2), 45–62. [Google Scholar]
- Rafi, M.; Faiz Ahmad, M.; Venkata Sumanth, S.; Sarvan, K. B. S. V. R.; Harsha Vardhan, K.; Shabber, S. Lead Scoring Model Using Machine Learning. In International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Intelligent Systems; Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2025; pp. 47–59. [Google Scholar]
- Rahman, M. M.; Kaiser, M. S. Technological Advancement and the Rise of Cybercrime in Bangladesh: Trends, Challenges, and Policy Responses. In The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Problems; Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, 2025; pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar]
- Rasel, A. A. S.; Karim, R.; Chowdhury, M. Algorithmic fairness and consumer trust in AI-enabled banking. Int. J. Ethical AI Financ. 2025, 7(1), 22–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ridzuan, N. N.; Masri, M.; Anshari, M.; Fitriyani, N. L.; Syafrudin, M. AI in the financial sector: The line between innovation, regulation and ethical responsibility. Information 2024, 15(8), 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ridzuan, N. S.; Abdullah, S.; Hassan, M. Z. The role of machine learning and predictive analytics in transforming financial services. J. Financ. Innov. 2024, 10(2), 77–95. [Google Scholar]
- Rizvee, M. B.; Siddik, M. N. A.; Kabiraj, S. Exploring Antecedents of Rural Users’ Continuance of Use Intention Toward Mobile Financial Services in Bangladesh: Deployment of Expectation Confirmation Model. J. Risk Financ. Manag. 2025, 18(5), 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saha, P.; Dey, K. N.; Hossan, F.; Goldar, S. C.; Pritha, I. J.; Halimuzzaman, M. Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Bank Customer Relationship Management in Bangladesh. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2025, 3(1), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarker, S. K. AI applications for e-KYC and identity fraud detection in Bangladesh’s FinTech sector: A literature review. ResearchGate. 2025. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/396210485_AI_APPLICATIONS_FOR_E-KYC_AND_IDENTITY_FRAUD_DETECTION_IN_BANGLADESH%27S_FINTECH_SECTOR_A_LITERATURE_REVIEW.
- Shili, A.; Toukabri, M. Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility and e-WOM on Corporate E-reputation: Application on Banking Sector in Saudi Arabia. Management 2025, 29(2), 63–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabaku, E.; Duçi, E.; Kapçiu, R.; Kosova, A. M. Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence in banking: A case study on the integration of virtual assistants in customer service. Int. Res. J. Mod. Eng. Technol. Sci. 2025, 7(1), 4177–4183. [Google Scholar]
- UNDP. National AI readiness assessment report: Ethical AI and digital inclusion in Bangladesh. United Nations Development Programme. 2025. Available online: https://www.undp.org/bangladesh/reports.
- Venkatesh, V.; Thong, J. Y. L.; Xu, X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 2012, 36(1), 157–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zungu, L. T.; Nkosi, S.; Gumede, K. Hyper-personalized recommendations in mobile banking and consumer adoption behavior. J. Financ. Technol. Consum. Behav. 2025, 3(1), 15–29. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).