Submitted:
21 April 2026
Posted:
23 April 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. General Physicochemical Properties

3.2. Ionic Composition and Salinity
| Element |
Wavelength (λ) (nm) |
Concentration (mg/L) |
Molarity (mol/L) |
| Calcium (Ca) | 317.933 | 1684.013 | 0.042 |
| Magnesium (Mg) | 285.213 | 304.453 | 0.0125 |
| Potassium (K) | 766.490 | 264.340 | 0.0068 |

3.2.1. BTEX and Mercury Results
|
BTEX compound |
Analytical method | Concentration (µg/L) | Method detection limit (MDL) |
| Toluene |
Standard Methods 6200B |
69.0 | 0.1–1 µg/L |
| Benzene | 40.3 | 0.1–1 µg/L | |
| m,p-Xylene | 17.4 | 0.2–1 µg/L |
3.2.2. Mercury (Hg)
3.3. Electrochemical Cell Configuration

3.3.1. Cyclic Voltammetry (HER)
3.3.2. Tafel Slope Analysis
3.4 Hydrogen Quantification by Gas Chromatography
- (µmol) is the amount of hydrogen determined by gas chromatography corresponding to the injected gas volume using the GC sampling loop,
- (µL) is the volume of gaseous sample introduced into the chromatograph,
- (µL) is the total gas volume available in the electrochemical cell, where hydrogen accumulates during electrolysis.
3.6. Faradaic Efficiency
3.7. Electrical Efficiency
3.8. Impedance Analysis and Interfacial Modeling
3.8.1. Data Acquisition and Treatment (EIS)

3.9. Comparative Response in Nyquist Plot

3.10. Bode Analysis and Interfacial Interpretation
3.11. Interfacial Interpretation and Matrix Effects
3.12. Equivalent Circuit Modeling
3.12. Comparative Hydrogen and Oxygen Production under Different Electrolyte Compositions
4. Discussion
4.1. Physicochemical Constraints and Electrolyte Matrix Effects
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| HER | Hydrogen Evolution Reaction |
| OER | Oxygen Evolution Reaction |
| EIS | Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy |
| GC-TCD | Gas Chromatography–Thermal Conductivity Detector |
| PW | Produced Water |
| KOH | Potassium Hydroxide |
| UPW | Ultrapure Water |
| CPE | Constant Phase Element |
| OCP | Open Circuit Potential |
References
- Renewable Energy Agency I, Trade Organization Agency W. International trade and green hydrogen: Supporting the global transition to a low-carbon economy. 2023.
- Amini Horri B, Ozcan H. Green hydrogen production by water electrolysis: Current status and challenges. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem 2024;47. [CrossRef]
- Kumar P, Date A, Mahmood N, Das RK, Shabani B. Freshwater supply for hydrogen production: An underestimated challenge. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2024;78:202–17. [CrossRef]
- Jones ER, Bierkens MFP, van Vliet MTH. Current and future global water scarcity intensifies when accounting for surface water quality. Nat Clim Chang 2024;14:629–35. [CrossRef]
- Shannon MA, Bohn PW, Elimelech M, Georgiadis JG, Marĩas BJ, Mayes AM. Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature 2008 452:7185 2008;452:301–10. [CrossRef]
- Mika Ł, Sztekler K, Bujok T, Boruta P, Radomska E. Seawater Treatment Technologies for Hydrogen Production by Electrolysis—A Review. Energies 2024, Vol 17, 2024;17. [CrossRef]
- Badea GE, Hora C, Maior I, Cojocaru A, Secui C, Filip SM, et al. Sustainable Hydrogen Production from Seawater Electrolysis: Through Fundamental Electrochemical Principles to the Most Recent Development. Energies (Basel) 2022;15. [CrossRef]
- Núñez R, Merayo N, Hermosilla D, Gascó A, Dos santos-García AJ, Caravaca Á. Electrochemical treatment of industrial wastewater for hydrogen production. Curr Opin Electrochem 2024;46. [CrossRef]
- Araya SS, Abdelhamid C, Latrach A, Rabiei M, Venugopal K. Produced Water Use for Hydrogen Production: Feasibility Assessment in Wyoming, USA. Energies 2025 2025. [CrossRef]
- Igunnu ET, Chen GZ. Produced water treatment technologies. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies 2011:157–77. [CrossRef]
- Becker H, Murawski J, Shinde D V, Stephens IEL, Hinds G, Smith G. Impact of impurities on water electrolysis: a review 2023. [CrossRef]
- Yang Q, Xu L, He Q, Wu D. Reduced cathodic scale and enhanced electrochemical precipitation of Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ by a novel fenced cathode structure: Formation of strong alkaline microenvironment and favorable crystallization. Water Res 2022;209:117893. [CrossRef]
- Majumdar A, Haas M, Elliot I, Nazari S. Control and control-oriented modeling of PEM water electrolyzers: A review. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2023;48:30621–41. [CrossRef]
- Vedrtnam A, Kalauni K, Pahwa R. Water Electrolysis Technologies and Their Modeling Approaches: A Comprehensive Review. Eng 2025;6. [CrossRef]
- Lazanas AC, Prodromidis MI. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy─A Tutorial. ACS Measurement Science Au 2023;3:162–93. [CrossRef]
- Becker H, Murawski J, Shinde D V., Stephens IEL, Hinds G, Smith G. Impact of impurities on water electrolysis: a review. Sustain Energy Fuels 2023;7:1565–603. [CrossRef]
- Fathy A, Rezk H, Yousri D, Alharbi AG, Alshammari S, Hassan YB. Maximizing Bio-Hydrogen Production from an Innovative Microbial Electrolysis Cell Using Artificial Intelligence. Sustainability 2023, Vol 15, 2023;15. [CrossRef]
- ISO 5667-3:2024 - Water quality — Sampling — Part 3: Preservation and handling of water samples n.d. https://www.iso.org/es/contents/data/standard/08/22/82273.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com (accessed March 3, 2026).
- Andrzej Lasia. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy and its Applications. New York: 2014. [CrossRef]
- Lindquist GA, Xu Q, Oener SZ, Boettcher SW. Membrane Electrolyzers for Impure-Water Splitting. Joule 2020;4:2549–61. [CrossRef]
- Shinagawa T, Garcia-Esparza AT, Takanabe K. Insight on Tafel slopes from a microkinetic analysis of aqueous electrocatalysis for energy conversion OPEN 2015:23955–6900. [CrossRef]
- Antonini G, Ordonez-Loza J, Mathew J, Cullen J, Muller C, Al-Omari A, et al. Electrode Materials Comparison for Hydrogen Production from Wastewater Electrolysis of Spiked Secondary Effluent. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2025;17. [CrossRef]
- Wang G, Chen A, Chen Y, Qiao F, Wang J, Yang N, et al. Advancements in electrochemical synthesis: Expanding from water electrolysis to dual-value-added products. EScience 2025;5. [CrossRef]
- Wang S, Wan C, Shah AH, Huang Y, Duan X. Electrical Double Layer Effects on Alkaline Hydrogen Reactions on Platinum. Precision Chemistry 2025;2025:611. [CrossRef]
- George E. Groschen, Terri L. Arnold, William S. Morrow, Kelly L. Warner. Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5006 National Water-Quality Assessment Program Occurrence and Distribution of Iron, Manganese, and Selected Trace Elements in Ground Water in the Glacial Aquifer System of the Northern United States. Scientific Investigations Report 2009–5006 2009.
- Lu X, Tu W, Zhou Y, Zou Z. Effects of Electrolyte Ionic Species on Electrocatalytic Reactions: Advances, Challenges, and Perspectives. Adv Energy Mater 2023;13. [CrossRef]
- Peyvandi K, Haghtalab A, Omidkhah MR. Using an electrochemical technique to study the effective variables on morphology and deposition of CaCO 3 and BaSO 4 at the metal surface 2012. [CrossRef]
- Yamada H, Yoshii K, Asahi M, Chiku M, Kitazumi Y. The 66th special feature “Novel Aspects and Approaches to Experimental Methods for Electrochemistry” Cyclic Voltammetry Part 1: Fundamentals †. Comprehensive Paper Electrochemistry 2022;90:102005. [CrossRef]
- Bard AJ., Faulkner LR. Electrochemical methods : fundamentals and applications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2001.
- van der Heijden O, Park S, Vos RE, Eggebeen JJJ, Koper MTM. Tafel Slope Plot as a Tool to Analyze Electrocatalytic Reactions. ACS Energy Lett 2024;9:1871–9. [CrossRef]
- Guidelli R, Compton RG, Feliu JM, Gileadi E, Lipkowski J, Schmickler W, et al. Definition of the transfer coefficient in electrochemistry (IUPAC Recommendations 2014). Pure and Applied Chemistry, vol. 86, Walter de Gruyter GmbH; 2014, p. 259–62. [CrossRef]
- Toonen A. Hydrogen Detection with a TCD using Mixed Carrier Gas on the Agilent Micro GC Author n.d.
- Poole CF. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY. n.d.
- Harrison KW, Remick R, Martin GD, Hoskin A. Hydrogen Production: Fundamentals and Cas Study Summaries e Preprint. 2010.
- Hodges A, Hoang AL, Tsekouras G, Wagner K, Lee CY, Swiegers GF, et al. A high-performance capillary-fed electrolysis cell promises more cost-competitive renewable hydrogen. Nature Communications 2022 13:1 2022;13:1304-. [CrossRef]
- Zou X, Zhang Y. Noble metal-free hydrogen evolution catalysts for water splitting. Chem Soc Rev 2015;44:5148–80. [CrossRef]
- Cördoba-Torres P, Mesquita TJ, Nogueira RP. Relationship between the origin of constant-phase element behavior in electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and electrode surface structure. Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2015;119:4136–47. [CrossRef]
- Zhang Y;, Li Z;, Yu E;, Ye H;, Guo X;, Zhou D;, et al. Citation: A Review of Hydrogen Production via Seawater A Review of Hydrogen Production via Seawater Electrolysis: Current Status and Challenges 2024. [CrossRef]
- Carmo M, Fritz DL, Mergel J, Stolten D. A comprehensive review on PEM water electrolysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2013;38:4901–34. [CrossRef]
- Chauhan D, Ahn YH. Alkaline electrolysis of wastewater and low-quality water. J Clean Prod 2023;397:136613. [CrossRef]
- Magar HS, A Hassan RY, Mulchandani A. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS): Principles, Construction, and Biosensing Applications 2021. [CrossRef]
- Ledezma-Yanez I, Wallace WDZ, Sebastián-Pascual P, Climent V, Feliu JM, Koper MTM. Interfacial water reorganization as a pH-dependent descriptor of the hydrogen evolution rate on platinum electrodes n.d. [CrossRef]







|
Physicochemical Parameter |
Method | Average Value |
Uncertainty (±) |
Unit |
| pH | Electrometric method | 6.92 | 0.08 | (dimensionless) |
| Electrical conductivity | Electrical conductivity and resistivity of water | 104.400 | 1.939 | µS/cm |
| Turbidity | Nephelometric method | 100.17 | 4.360 | NTU |
| Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) | Gravimetric method by evaporation | 43.6 | 2.73 | g/L |
| Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) | Dichromate oxidation in acidic medium with digestion | 1.642 | 3.790 | mg O₂/L |
| Measurement temperature | Thermometric method | 19.03 | 0.2867 | °C |
| Element | Unit | Wavelength (λ) (nm) | Concentration (mg/L) |
| Iron (Fe) | (mg/L) | 238.204 | 1.576 |
| Lithium (Li) | (mg/L) | 670.784 | 3.891 |
| Manganese (Mn) | (mg/L) | 257.610 | 0.275 |
| Detected ions | Method | Wavelength (λ) (nm) | Average value | Uncertainty (±) | Unit |
| Sulfates (SO₄²⁻) | Precipitation with barium chloride crystals using LED source with optical filter | 466 | 63.00 | 4.966 | mg/L |
| Chloride (Cl⁻) | Volumetric titration with mercuric nitrate | ---- | 31,333 | 1,433 | mg/L |
| Nitrates (NO₃⁻) | Colorimetry using chromotropic acid reagent | 420 | 14.50 | 2.15 | mg/L |
| Sulfide (S2-) | Ion-selective electrode | ---- | 32.10 | 3.04 | mg/L |
| Tiempo de electrólisis (h) | Área cromatográfica (xi) (a. u) | mol) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23608 | 0.139 |
| 2 | 45133 | 0.144 |
| 3 | 57515 | 0.146 |
| 4 | 60492 | 0.147 |
| ∑ | 186748 | 0.576 |
| Electrolyte | (Rs) | (Rct) | (R3) | CPE1-T | CPE1-n | CPE2-T | CPE2-n | χ² |
| (Ω) | (Ω) | (Ω) | (F·s^ (n-1)) | (F·s^ (n-1)) | ||||
| PW 10% + UPW 90% | 324.8 | 488.1 | 293.6 | 1.29×10⁻⁵ | 0.821 | 3.68×10⁻⁶ | 0.855 | 9.64×10⁻⁴ |
| PW 10% + KOH 90% | 9.545 | 7195 | 304.8 | 2.68×10⁻⁵ | 0.879 | 1.44×10⁻⁶ | 0.989 | 5.96×10⁻⁴ |
| PW 25% + KOH 75% | 10.24 | 6066 | 548.4 | 2.06×10⁻⁵ | 0.851 | 1.63×10⁻⁶ | 0.989 | 8.56×10⁻⁴ |
| KOH | 9.058 | 6693 | 264.7 | 2.28×10⁻⁵ | 0.91 | 1.51×10⁻⁶ | 0.978 | 2.62×10⁻⁴ |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.