Submitted:
21 April 2026
Posted:
22 April 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Experimental Setup
3. Results
3.1. Post-Compression Results with HCF Module
3.2. Post-Compression Results with MPC Module
3.3. Post-Compression Results with Cascade Compression Module
| Astigmatism 0° | Astigmatism 45° | Coma 0° | Coma 90° | Spherical | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before MPC () | −0.002 | −0.001 | −0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| After MPC () | −0.002 | 0.002 | 0.000 | −0.000 | 0.001 |
| Before HCF () | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| After HCF () | −0.002 | 0.004 | −0.000 | −0.001 | 0.000 |
3.4. Experimental Results of HHG with Different Driving Beam Conditions
5. Conclusions
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| HCF | Hollow core fiber |
| MPC | Multi pass cell |
| HHG | High harmonic generation |
| SPM | Self-phase modulation |
| CPA | Chirped pulse amplification |
| XUV | Extreme ultraviolet |
References
- Strickland, D.; Mourou, G. Compression of amplified chirped optical pulses. Opt. Commun. 1985, 55, 447–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Wu, F.; Hu, J.; et al. The laser beamline in SULF facility. High Power Laser Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, D.C. Ultrahigh-average-power diode-pumped Nd: YAG and Yb: YAG lasers. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 2002, 33, 861–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brons, J.; Pervak, V.; Bauer, D.; et al. Powerful 100-fs-scale Kerr-lens mode-locked thin-disk oscillator. Opt. Lett. 2016, 41, 3567–3570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schulz, M.; Riedel, R.; Willner, A.; et al. Yb: YAG Innoslab amplifier: Efficient high repetition rate subpicosecond pumping system for optical parametric chirped pulse amplification. Opt. Lett. 2011, 36, 2456–2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Müller, M.; Kienel, M.; Klenke, A.; et al. 1 kW 1 mJ eight-channel ultrafast fiber laser. Opt. Lett. 2016, 41, 3439–3442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, S.; Liu, X.; Gao, Y.; et al. Thin-disk multi-pass amplifier for kilowatt-class ultrafast lasers. High Power Laser Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heyl, C.M.; Arnold, C.L.; Couairon, A.; et al. Introduction to macroscopic power scaling principles for high-order harmonic generation. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 2016, 50, 013001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lorek, E.; Larsen, E.W.; Heyl, C.M.; et al. High-order harmonic generation using a high-repetition-rate turnkey laser. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2014, 85, 123106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Jullien, A.; Malvache, A.; et al. Generation of 4.3 fs, 1 mJ laser pulses via compression of circularly polarized pulses in a gas-filled hollow-core fiber. Opt. Lett. 2009, 34, 1588–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Böhle, F.; Kretschmar, M.; Jullien, A.; et al. Compression of CEP-stable multi-mJ laser pulses down to 4 fs in long hollow fibers. Laser Phys. Lett. 2014, 11, 095401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagy, T.; Kretschmar, M.; Vrakking, M.J.J.; et al. Generation of above-terawatt 1.5-cycle visible pulses at 1 kHz by post-compression in a hollow fiber. Opt. Lett. 2020, 45, 3313–3316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Daniault, L.; Kaur, J.; Gallé, G.; et al. Sub-2-cycle post-compression of multi-mJ energy Ti: Sapphire laser pulses in a gas-filled multi-pass cell. Opt. Lett. 2024, 49, 6833–6836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, C.H.; Wu, W.H.; Kuo, S.H.; et al. Greater than 50 times compression of 1030 nm Yb: KGW laser pulses to single-cycle duration. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 15638–15648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Fang, S. Single-cycle pulse compression with over 20-fold peak power enhancement at an average power of 13.5 W. Opt. Lett. 2025, 50, 5482–5485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pi, Z.; Kim, H.Y.; Goulielmakis, E. Synthesis of single-cycle pulses based on a Yb: KGW laser amplifier. Optica 2025, 12, 296–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plach, M.; Vismarra, F.; Appi, E.; et al. Spatial aberrations in high-order harmonic generation. Ultrafast Sci. 2024, 4, 0054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wodzinski, T.; Künzel, S.; Koliyadu, J.C.P.; et al. High-harmonic generation wave front dependence on a driving infrared wave front. Appl. Opt. 2020, 59, 1363–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Du, Y.; Li, K.; Niu, J.; et al. Multicolor wavefront sensing using Talbot effect for high-order harmonic generation. Phys. Rev. Res. 2024, 6, 043072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Pelekanidis, A.; Du, M.; et al. Observation of chromatic effects in high-order harmonic generation. Phys. Rev. Res. 2023, 5, 043100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balasubramaniam, G.M.; Allam, S.R.; Anand, V.; et al. Roadmap on singular optics and its applications. Appl. Phys. B 2026, 132, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abrams, R. Coupling losses in hollow waveguide laser resonators. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 2003, 8, 838–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lavenu; Natile, L.; Guichard, M.; et al. High-power two-cycle ultrafast source based on hybrid nonlinear compression. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 1958–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hult, J. A fourth-order Runge–Kutta in the interaction picture method for simulating supercontinuum generation in optical fibers. J. Light. Technol. 2007, 25, 3770–3775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- pyNLO Developers. PyNLO: A Python Package for Nonlinear Optics Modeling. Available online: Https://github.Com/Pynlo/PyNLO.
- Plach, M.; Vismarra, F.; Appi, E.; et al. Spat. Aberrations High-Order Harmon. Generation. Ultrafast Sci. 2024, 4, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, J.; Liu, J.; Du, J.; et al. Development of High-Photon-Flux Ultrafast Coherent Extreme-Ultraviolet Light Source Based on Gas High Harmonic Generation. Chin. J. Lasers 2024, 51, 1901016. [Google Scholar]
- Steffen, H.; Jan, R.; Manuel, K.; et al. Single-pass high harmonic generation at high repetition rate and photon flux. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 2016, 49, 172002. [Google Scholar]















| Astigmatism 0° | Astigmatism 45° | Coma 0° | Coma 90° | Spherical | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before HCF () | −0.012 | −0.013 | 0.008 | 0.008 | −0.007 |
| After HCF () | 0.027 | −0.008 | 0.007 | 0.011 | −0.001 |
| Astigmatism 0° | Astigmatism 45° | Coma 0° | Coma 90° | Spherical | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before MPC () | −0.353 | 0.806 | 0.058 | 0.113 | 0.022 |
| After MPC () | 0.205 | −0.106 | 0.010 | 0.026 | −0.005 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).