3.1. Post-Compression Results with HCF Module
With the HCF post-compression module, the input Gaussian beam was successfully coupled into the fundamental mode of the argon-filled capillary. The transmission efficiency as a function of input power was investigated, as shown in
Figure 5. Each error bar represents the standard deviation over 10 consecutive measurements. The transmission efficiency exhibits a trend of initially increasing with input power, reaching a maximum coupling efficiency of approximately 56% at an input power of around 20 W, before decreasing to 54% when the input power was increased to 65.2 W. The initial increase is attributed to improved mode matching, where moderate self-focusing reduces beam divergence and enhances overlap with the fundamental
mode. At higher input power, however, strong nonlinear effects—particularly the interplay between Kerr self-focusing and plasma-induced defocusing—lead to focal instability and spatiotemporal distortions. These effects promote coupling into higher-order modes with larger propagation losses, thereby reducing the overall efficiency.
In addition, the coupling efficiency is sensitive to the input wavefront quality. Residual aberrations degrade the overlap with the fundamental mode, consistent with the wavefront evolution observed in Figure 8. Combined with gas-related losses and practical system imperfections, these factors explain the lower efficiency (~55%) compared to optimized HCF systems (~70%), highlighting the critical role of spatial phase and nonlinear dynamics in HCF-based post-compression.
The spectral broadening dynamics within the gas-filled HCF are governed by the accumulated nonlinear phase shift, i.e., the B-integral, defined as
, which arises from SPM. As shown in
Figure 6a, the output spectral bandwidth increases monotonically with input power, consistent with the linear scaling of
(and thus the maximum frequency shift
) with peak intensity
. Given that SPM is the dominant mechanism for spectral expansion, the gas pressure exerts an influence comparable to that of the input power by modulating the nonlinear refractive index
, which is linearly proportional to the gas density. This is demonstrated in
Figure 6b, which presents the output spectra measured under argon pressures of 3, 5, and 7 bar using the same high-resolution spectrometer (FX 2000, Zolix) as in
Figure 6a. A clear progressive spectral broadening is observed with increasing pressure, following the scaling
at a fixed input power. However, it should be noted that while higher pressure enhances spectral broadening, it also increases the risk of ionization-induced losses and plasma defocusing. Therefore, an optimal pressure exists that balances spectral broadening against nonlinear propagation stability. These results collectively underscore the critical role of pressure-mediated
tuning in optimizing HCF-based pulse compressors.
Under the argon backing pressure of 7 bar, the HCF output pulse exhibits a 75 nm spectral bandwidth at the −10 dB level, corresponding to a Fourier-transform-limited (FTL) pulse duration of 26.5 fs (red dashed line in
Figure 7). Due to the nonlinear SPM process, the spectrally broadened pulse carries a significant amount of dispersion, which must be compensated to achieve pulse compression. A set of chirped mirrors providing a total GDD of −2800 fsalign="left" was employed for this purpose. The final compressed pulse duration was measured to be 27 fs (FWHM) using an autocorrelator, as shown in
Figure 7 (blue solid line). This result is in excellent agreement with the SPM-based numerical simulation (black dashed line in
Figure 7), which was performed using the PyNLO package [
24,
25], confirming the effectiveness of the dispersion management strategy.
A Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor (HASO4 VIS, Imagine Optic) was used to inspect the beam spatial profile and wavefront quality. The sensor was pre-calibrated using a 1030 nm light source to ensure measurement accuracy. The beam spatial profiles and corresponding wavefront maps before and after the HCF module are presented in
Figure 8 (left and right columns, respectively). After propagating through the 1.35-m-long HCF, the beam spatial distribution becomes noticeably more symmetrical, which is attributed to the waveguide effect. Quantitative wavefront analysis reveals a marked improvement in spatial phase quality: the peak-to-valley (PV) value decreases from 0.115λ to 0.095λ, and the root-mean-square (RMS) value decreases from 0.021λ to 0.015λ (where λ = 1030 nm). To identify the specific aberration components contributing to this improvement, Zernike polynomial decomposition was performed, as summarized in
Table 1. Among the basic aberrations, including astigmatism (0° and 45°), coma (0° and 90°), and spherical aberration, the most significant improvement is observed in the 45° astigmatism component.
This wavefront originates from the mode-selective coupling process in the HCF. By optimizing the input beam waist to 64.3% of the bore diameter, the fundamental EH₁₁ mode is preferentially excited, while higher-order modes are strongly suppressed due to their higher propagation losses. Consequently, the HCF exhibits inherent modal filtering properties, which effectively suppress higher-order modes and reduce low-order aberrations, leading to improved output beam quality. This result is consistent with the well-established mode-cleaning capability of hollow-core fibers and provides quantitative experimental evidence under high-power, high-repetition-rate operating conditions.
3.2. Post-Compression Results with MPC Module
Figure 9 shows the measured transmission efficiency of the MPC as a function of input power over the range of 5 W to 70 W. Each data point represents the average of ten consecutive measurements, and the error bars indicate the standard deviation. The MPC maintains a high transmission efficiency between 90% and 91% across the entire tested power range. A slight decrease from 91% at low power to 90% at the maximum input power of 66 W is observed, which is attributed to thermal effects induced by high-power operation that slightly alter the mode-matching condition within the cavity. This relatively stable efficiency demonstrates the good power-handling capability of the MPC scheme.
The spectral broadening and subsequent pulse compression performance of the MPC were characterized under an argon pressure of 4.2 bar. The 230 fs input pulses underwent SPM during 56 reflections (28 round trips) within the Herriott-type cavity, resulting in significant spectral broadening. The output spectrum, shown in
Figure 10a, exhibits a −10 dB bandwidth of approximately 70 nm, which supports a Fourier-transform-limited pulse duration of 33 fs. To compensate the dispersion accumulated during nonlinear propagation, a pair of chirped mirrors providing a total group delay dispersion of −3000 fsalign="left" was employed. The compressed pulse duration was measured to be 34 fs (FWHM) using an autocorrelator, assuming a Lorentz pulse shape for fitting, as presented in
Figure 10b. Numerical simulations were performed using the generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation, taking into account the gas pressure, cavity geometry, and mirror dispersion. The simulated spectrum and temporal profile are shown in
Figure 10c and
Figure 10d, respectively. The experimental results show good agreement with the simulations in terms of both spectral shape and compressed pulse duration, with the slight discrepancy in the spectral asymmetry attributed to higher-order nonlinear effects such as self-steepening, which are not fully captured in the simplified model.
The spatial properties of the beam were rigorously characterized before and after the MPC (see
Figure 11) using the same Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor. In contrast to the HCF, which improves beam quality through waveguide modal filtering, the MPC exhibits a distinct spatial evolution characteristic. Despite having a significantly poorer input wavefront (PV = 2.319λ, RMS = 0.322λ), the output wavefront shows substantial improvement after passing through the MPC module, with PV reduced to 0.573λ and RMS reduced to 0.094λ. Further analysis of the Zernike polynomials (
Table 2) reveals the detailed evolution of individual aberration components, particularly a notable reduction in the 45° astigmatism component from 0.806λ to −0.106λ, as well as reductions in coma and spherical aberration.
This observed wavefront improvement is attributed to the quasi-waveguide mode-filtering effect of the Herriott-type MPC. In an ideal MPC with perfectly aligned spherical mirrors, the cavity supports a set of eigenmodes that can propagate stably over many round trips. Under proper mode-matching conditions, higher-order transverse modes experience larger diffraction losses due to their greater divergence angles and are effectively filtered out during multiple reflections, while the fundamental mode achieves self-reproduction and propagates with low loss. This quasi-waveguide effect endows the MPC with mode-cleaning capabilities similar to those of the HCF, leading to improved output beam quality.
However, the MPC’s wavefront improvement is highly dependent on the input beam mode-matching accuracy and cavity alignment. While the quasi-waveguide effect filters out higher-order spatial modes, low-order aberrations such as astigmatism that are already present in the input beam or introduced by residual surface errors of the concave mirrors can still persist or be modified through the cavity propagation. In our experiment, the residual output aberrations (PV = 0.573λ, primarily 45° astigmatism) are likely contributed by a combination of factors: (i) the significantly poorer input wavefront (2.319λ) compared to the HCF case (0.115λ); (ii) minor residual surface figure errors of the concave mirrors; and (iii) slight misalignment from the ideal cavity condition. Unlike the HCF waveguide, which directly constrains transverse modes through boundary conditions and is relatively tolerant to input aberrations, the MPC’s quasi-waveguide filtering effect requires precise mode matching to achieve optimal performance. This sensitivity explains why the output wavefront of the MPC (0.573λ), despite substantial improvement from its input, remains worse than that of the HCF output (0.095λ), which benefits from both excellent input beam quality and strong waveguide modal filtering.
It is also worth noting that the MPC’s transmission efficiency remains high (90–91%) across the tested power range, and the wavefront improvement is consistently observed under proper operating conditions. These results demonstrate that the MPC, when properly aligned and mode-matched, can serve as an effective beam-cleaning element in high-power post-compression systems, although its performance is more sensitive to input conditions compared to the HCF.
3.3. Post-Compression Results with Cascade Compression Module
The measured spectral intensity and temporal profile at the output of this first-stage MPC are shown in
Figure 12a and
Figure 12b, respectively. As presented in
Figure 12a, the output spectrum exhibits a −10 dB bandwidth of approximately 72 nm, which supports a Fourier-transform-limited pulse duration of about 30 fs. After dispersion compensation using chirped mirrors providing a total group delay dispersion of −400 fsalign="left", the pulse duration was measured to be 32 fs (FWHM) using an autocorrelator, assuming a sechalign="left" pulse shape for fitting, as shown in
Figure 12b. The measured pulse duration is close to the Fourier-transform limit, indicating efficient dispersion compensation. The transmission efficiency of this first-stage MPC was measured to be 96%. This efficiency improvement was primarily contributed by the lower gas pressure, which reduces scattering and ionization losses.
The measured spectral intensity and temporal profile at the output of this second-stage HCF are shown in
Figure 13a and
Figure 13b, respectively. As presented in
Figure 13a, the output spectrum exhibits a broad bandwidth spanning from approximately 700 nm to 1200 nm, supporting a Fourier-transform-limited (FTL) pulse duration of 7.4 fs. After dispersion compensation using two pairs of chirped mirrors (Ultrafast Innovation) providing a total group delay dispersion of −240 fsalign="left" over the 650–1350 nm spectral range, the pulse duration was measured to be 7.5 fs (FWHM) using an autocorrelator, assuming a sechalign="left" pulse shape for fitting, as shown in
Figure 13b. The measured pulse duration is very close to the Fourier-transform limit, indicating near-ideal dispersion compensation.
The transmission efficiency of this second-stage HCF was measured to be 72.5%, and the overall transmission efficiency of the cascaded system from the second laser input to the final output is approximately 70%.
The spatial beam quality at each stage of the cascaded compression scheme was characterized using a quadri-wave lateral shearing interferometer (QWLSI) wavefront sensor (SID4, PHASICS). A key advantage of this sensor is its achromatic operation over the 400–1100 nm spectral range, which eliminates the need for recalibration when measuring different wavelengths.
The beam profiles and corresponding wavefront maps before and after the first-stage MPC [
Figure 14a–d] and before and after the second-stage HCF [
Figure 14e–h] are presented in
Figure 14.
Before entering the cascaded compression system, the driving laser exhibits an excellent initial beam quality, with a wavefront PV of approximately 0.002λ and RMS of approximately 0.001λ (λ = 1030 nm). After propagating through the first-stage MPC (1 bar Ar, 34 round trips), the output beam wavefront remains nearly unchanged, with PV and RMS values of 0.002λ and 0.001λ, respectively, as shown in
Figure 14c,d. This indicates that under proper mode-matching and low-pressure conditions, the MPC introduces negligible additional aberrations while achieving a compression factor of approximately 7 (from 223 fs to 32 fs).
The output beam from the first-stage MPC is then coupled into the second-stage HCF (1 m, 400 μm inner diameter, 1 bar Xe). After propagation through the HCF and subsequent dispersion compensation, the beam quality remains excellent, as shown in
Figure 14g,h. The wavefront PV and RMS values are measured to be 0.002λ and 0.001λ, respectively, which are almost identical to those of the input beam. This result demonstrates that the HCF, under proper coupling conditions, preserves the spatial coherence of the beam while further compressing the pulse from 32 fs to 7.5 fs with a transmission efficiency of 72.5%.
Overall, the cascaded MPC–HCF scheme achieves a total compression factor of approximately 30 (from 223 fs to 7.5 fs) with an overall transmission efficiency of approximately 70%, while maintaining excellent wavefront quality throughout the entire system (PV ≤ 0.002λ, RMS ≤ 0.001λ), as measured by the SID4 QWLSI wavefront sensor.
Table 3.
Zernike polynomials of the beam before and after the Cascade module.
Table 3.
Zernike polynomials of the beam before and after the Cascade module.
| |
Astigmatism 0° |
Astigmatism 45° |
Coma 0° |
Coma 90° |
Spherical |
| Before MPC () |
−0.002 |
−0.001 |
−0.000 |
0.000 |
0.001 |
| After MPC () |
−0.002 |
0.002 |
0.000 |
−0.000 |
0.001 |
| Before HCF () |
0.003 |
0.000 |
0.002 |
0.002 |
0.001 |
| After HCF () |
−0.002 |
0.004 |
−0.000 |
−0.001 |
0.000 |
3.4. Experimental Results of HHG with Different Driving Beam Conditions
The beam quality directly impacts HHG photon flux by influencing the phase-matching conditions and focal spot profile. An ideal plane-like wavefront is crucial for maintaining a long and stable interaction region between the driving laser and the generation medium, ensuring constructive interference of the emitted harmonics along the propagation direction. Aberrations such as astigmatism in the driving beam can disrupt this coherence, effectively shortening the useful interaction length and reducing the harmonic conversion efficiency [
26].
To evaluate the impact of beam quality on HHG, we performed experiments using the compressed pulses from both the HCF and the MPC under nominally similar conditions. The HHG setup followed our previous work [
27]. In both cases, the beam was focused by an f = 200 mm lens into an argon gas jet. For the HCF-driven case, the pulse energy at the target was 137.5 μJ with a duration of 27 fs at 200 kHz repetition rate, and the argon backing pressure was set to 6.5 bar. For the MPC-driven case, the pulse energy was 295 μJ with a duration of 34 fs at 200 kHz, and the argon backing pressure was 6.0 bar. The photon flux was calculated using a calibrated XUV photodiode (AXUV100G, Opto Diode) with corrections for the grating efficiency and Al filter transmittance
As shown in
Figure 15a, the HCF-driven source produced a well-resolved harmonic spectrum spanning from 25 nm to 40 nm (H25–H41 of the 1030 nm driver), with the strongest harmonic at approximately 30 nm and a photon flux of 1.25 × 10
11 photons/s. The MPC-driven source produced a similar spectral range but with a lower photon flux of 4.95 × 10
10 photons/s (
Figure 15b), approximately 2.5 times lower than that achieved with the HCF driver, despite the MPC pulses having higher single-pulse energy (295 μJ vs. 137.5 μJ).
Several factors may contribute to this difference. First, the pulse duration is shorter for the HCF driver (27 fs vs. 34 fs), which, according to literature scaling laws [
28], would enhance HHG efficiency by a factor of approximately 1.3–1.5. Second, the HCF driver has a significantly better output wavefront quality (PV = 0.095λ vs. 0.573λ for the MPC), which improves phase matching and focal spot quality. Third, the higher pulse energy of the MPC driver (by a factor of ~2.1) would, in isolation, favor higher HHG yield. Taking these factors together, the observed 2.5× advantage of the HCF driver cannot be explained by pulse duration or pulse energy alone, strongly suggesting that wavefront quality plays a significant role in determining HHG photon flux.