Submitted:
21 April 2026
Posted:
22 April 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Test Object and Morphological Characteristics
2.1.1. Test Object
2.1.2. Morphological Characteristics
2.2. Selective Separation Mechanism and Picking Window
2.2.1. Definition of Selective Separation Mechanism
2.2.2. Time-Varying Evolution Law of Mechanical Characteristics
2.2.3. Determination of Comprehensive Picking Window
2.3. System Composition and Working Principle of the Picker
2.3.1. System Composition of the Picker
2.3.2. Working Principle
2.4. Design of Key Components of the Picker
2.4.1. Design of Flexible Roller-Brush
2.4.1.1. Force Analysis of Bristle Striking Flowers
2.4.1.2. Dynamic Analysis of Bristles and Motor Selection
2.4.1.3. Selection and Arrangement of Roller-Brush Bristle Materials
2.4.1.4. Transient Dynamic Simulation Using ANSYS Workbench
- ①
- Spatial Deformation and Stress Distribution Characteristics
- ②
- Transient Bonding Force Time-History Analysis
2.4.2. Design of Profiling Arm
2.4.3. Structure and Principle of the Picker Platform
2.5. Experimental Design and Evaluation Indicators
2.5.1. Test Indicators and Factors
2.5.2. Experimental Design
2.5.2.1. Mixed I-Optimal RSD
2.5.2.2. Analysis of Interactive Effects
3. Results
3.1. Multi-objective Global Optimization and Parameter Selection
3.2. Verification of Field Picking Test
4. Discussion
4.1. Selective Separation Mechanism based on Biomechanical Characteristics
4.2. Non-linear Impact of Operational Parameters
4.3. Dominant Role of Material Properties in Selectivity
4.4. Limitations and Engineering Prospects
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| PWM | Pulse Width Modulation |
| ANOVA | Analysis Of Variance |
| CV | Coefficient of Variation |
References
- Gao, L.; He, Y.-Q.; Sun, Z.-G.; Lai, J.-D.; Chen, H.-G. Inheritance and Innovation of Intellectual Property Resources of Osmanthus fragrans Industry in China. South China Agric. Sci. Technol. 2023, 44, 185–190. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.-L.; Ye, T.-S.; Zeng, F.-Y.; et al. Determination and Purification of Total Flavonoids in Osmanthus fragrans at Different Harvesting Stages. Asia-Pac. Tradit. Med. 2018, 14, 44–47. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Chen, G.; Zhang, D.; Chen, F.; et al. Characterization of OfERF17 as a Key Regulator of Petal Senescence in Osmanthus fragrans. Forests 2025, 16, 615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, G.; Chen, F.; Zhang, D.; et al. Osmanthus fragrans Ethylene Response Factor OfERF1-3 Delays Petal Senescence and Is Involved in the Regulation of ABA Signaling. Forests 2024, 15, 1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.-Y.; Jia, S.-J.; Qu, Z.-B.; Fu, Z.-G. Design of a New Vibrating Osmanthus fragrans Harvesting Equipment. J. Anhui Agric. Sci. 2018, 46, 155–158. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Wu, Z.-C.; Li, L.-J.; Zhao, Q.; Guo, X.; Li, J. Design and Research of a Harvesting Actuator for Camellia oleifera Flowers during the Budding Period. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.-R. Research on Design of Flower-Class Traditional Chinese Medicine Harvesting Equipment Based on KJ-AHP-QFD. Master’s Thesis, Xihua University, Chengdu, China, 2024. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Li, L.-F. Design and Test of Combing-type Honeysuckle Harvesting Device. Master’s Thesis, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China, 2024. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Lv, H.; Li, L.-J.; Zhao, Q.; Wu, Z.-C.; Guo, X. Design and Experiment of a Shear-Type Camellia oleifera Flower Harvesting End-Effector. J. Agric. Mech. Res. 2024, 46, 134–139. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, H. Design of Motion Control System for End-effector of Roller-type Safflower Picking Robot. Master’s Thesis, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China, 2023. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Sun, C.-R.; Tan, S.-H.; Sun, S.-L.; et al. Design and test of the key components for a combing-type tobacco harvester. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2024, 17, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; Liu, J.-Y.; Yang, R.-B.; et al. A comb-brushing-type green soybean pod harvesting equipment: Design and experiment. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0293567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, C.-M.; Wang, S.-Y.; Chen, R.-S.; Yeh, J.-A.; Hou, M.-T. A Comb-Drive Actuator Driven by Capacitively-Coupled-Power. Sensors 2012, 12, 10881–10889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, S.-P.; Zhang, Z.-G.; et al. Optimal design and test of the flexible clamping device for safflower. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2025, 18, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, H.; Luo, D.; Gao, G.-M.; Wu, T.-L.; Diao, H.-W. Design and Experiment of a Safflower Picking Robot Based on a Parallel Manipulator. Eng. Agr. 2022, 42, e20210129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, Y.; Shan, L.; Zhao, R.; et al. Recent Advances in Flower Color and Fragrance of Osmanthus fragrans. Forests 2023, 14, 1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Q.; Zhang, Y.-F.; Wei, X.-R.; Xu, Y.-B.; Lin, J.-Z.; Yang, M.; Yang, J.-H.; Han, L.; Zheng, C.; Zhang, D.-K.; et al. Unveiling the Essence, Production Mechanisms, and Extraction Challenges of Osmanthus fragrans Essential Oil. Food Rev. Int. 2025, 41, 3118–3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ao, J.-X.; Ji, W.; Yu, X.-W.; Ruan, C.-Z.; Xu, B. End-Effectors for Fruit and Vegetable Harvesting Robots: A Review of Key Technologies, Challenges, and Future Prospects. Agronomy 2025, 15, 2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olfatnia, M.; Sood, S.; Gorman, J.-J.; Awtar, S. Large Stroke Electrostatic Comb-Drive Actuators Enabled by a Novel Flexure Mechanism. J. Microelectromech. S. 2013, 22, 483–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hohimer, C.-J.; Wang, H.; Bhusal, S.; et al. Design and Field Evaluation of a Robotic Apple Harvesting System with a 3D-Printed Soft-Robotic End-Effector. T. ASABE 2019, 62, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sui, S.-S.; Li, M.; Li, Z.-P.; et al. A comb-type end-effector for inflorescence thinning of table grapes. Comput. Electron. Agr. 2024, 217, 108607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ehlert, D. Current status and advanced solutions for chamomile harvesters. In Proceedings of the 69th International Conference on Agricultural Engineering (LAND TECHNIK AgEng), Hanover, Germany, 10–11 November 2011; 16, pp. 111–118. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, R.-Y.; Zheng, Z.-A.; Lu, X.-F.; et al. Design, simulation and test of roller comb type Chrysanthemum (Dendranthema morifolium Ramat) picking machine. Comput. Electron. Agr. 2021, 187, 106295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.-Y.; Yuan, X.-J.; Yang, Z.-P. Design, simulation, and experiment for the end effector of a spherical fruit picking robot. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 2023, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, H.; Xu, D.; Zheng, C.; Bai, X.; Li, W. Development and Testing of a Friction-Driven Forestry Electric Monorail Car. Forests 2023, 14, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.-F.; Li, S.-F.; Li, J.-B.; et al. Design and Test of a Comb-Brush-Type Honeysuckle-Picking Device. Agriculture 2023, 13, 2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Moulaa, M.; Zaalouk, A.-K.; Mahmoud, W.-A. Design of a portable machine for picking chamomile flowers. Sci. Rep. 2026, 16, 8726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, G.-Q.; Wu, D.; Xu, W.-P.; Tang, Y. Design and experiment of a comb-and-scrape Idesia polycarpa Maxim threshing device. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 33871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, C.-C.; Zeng, H.-F.; Ge, Y.; et al. Design and Experiment of a Roller-Brush Type Harvesting Device for Dry Safflower Based on Plant Clamping and Pose Adjustment. Machines 2025, 13, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Shao, Y.-C.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Design and Experimental Research of a Comb-Type Buckwheat-Harvesting Device. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, F.-X.; Li, X.-J.; Zhu, Y.-Y.; Ma, Z.-F.; Alisher, N. Crawler comb brush type Camellia oleifera fruit picking machine based on the multi-element main branch model. Biosyst. Eng. 2025, 260, 104327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jangali, R.; McGuinness, B.; Lim, H.; et al. Development of a Novel Multipurpose Robotic End Effector for Fruitlet Thinning and Fruit Harvesting of Apples. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 20th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), Puglia, Italy, 28–31 August 2024; pp. 2073–2078. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, Q.; Li, Y.; Wu, X.; Liu, J.; Zhang, X. Design of Rubber Tapping Mechanical Test Bench and Optimization of Rubber Tapping Machine Parameters. Forests 2025, 16, 1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]














| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Model | CZD-01 |
| Overall Dimensions (Length×Width×Height) | 3500×1550×1780 |
| Platform Power/kW | 4×1.2 |
| Climbing Angle/° | 30 (with 1-ton load) |
| Travel Mode | Wheeled+Covered Belt |
| Travel Speed/(km/h) | 3.6-7.2 |
| Steering Mode | Articulated Steering+Differential |
| Number of Profiling Arm Joints | 3 |
| Circumferential Rotating Speed/(r/min) | 6 (adjustable) |
| Picking Shaft Speed Range/(r/min) | 0-600 |
| Picking Shaft Length/(mm) | 800 |
| Picking Roller Diameter/(mm) | 48 |
| Roller-Brush Bristle Diameter/(mm) | 4 (material customizable) |
| Material | Elastic Modulus(GPa) | Tensile Strength(MPa) | Compressive Strength (MPa) | Surface Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PA6 Nylon Rod | 2.8 | 80 | 110 | Smooth |
| Smooth PU Polyurethane Round Rod | 1.2 | 27 | 1.1 | Smooth |
| Rough PU Polyurethane Round Rod | 1.2 | 27 | 1.1 | Rough |
| Material / Component | Density (kg/m3) | Young’s Modulus (MPa) | Poisson’s Ratio | Reference / Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Branch | 1100 | 2100 | 0.33 | Estimated from generic broadleaf wood |
| Petiole | 1050 | 45 | 0.38 | Experimental estimation |
| Leaf blade | 950 | 12 | 0.4 | Standard foliar tissue properties |
| Pedicel | 1000 | 25 | 0.35 | Experimental estimation |
| Corolla (Flower) | 850 | 5 | 0.42 | Experimental estimation |
| Smooth PU (Shore A 75) | 1200 | 25 | 0.45 | Manufacturer technical data |
| PA6 Nylon (Shore D 80) | 1140 | 2800 | 0.39 | Manufacturer technical data |
| Level | Factor | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Roller speed (r/min) (A) |
Circumferential rotation speed(r/min) (B) |
Brush Material (C) |
|
| -1 | 100 | 5 | PA6 Nylon Rod |
| 0 | 150 | 10 | Smooth PU Polyurethane Round Rod |
| 1 | 200 | 15 | Rough PU Polyurethane Round Rod |
| Order number | Factor | Evaluating indicator | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roller speed (r/min) (A) |
Circumferential rotation speed(r/min) (B) |
Brush Material (C) |
Flower Picking rate(%) (H) |
Leaf detachment rate(%) (Y) |
|
| 1 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 72 | 6 |
| 2 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 82 | 8 |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 75 | 5 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 82 | 4 |
| 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 79 | 7 |
| 6 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 73 | 4 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 83 | 9 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 85 | 8 |
| 9 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 74 | 13 |
| 10 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 74 | 4 |
| 11 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 77 | 17 |
| 12 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 84 | 15 |
| 13 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 74 | 12 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 84 | 3 |
| 15 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 79 | 5 |
| 16 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 71 | 3 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 82 | 5 |
| 18 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 80 | 6 |
| 19 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 69 | 11 |
| 20 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 78 | 19 |
| 21 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 73 | 3 |
| 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 84 | 5 |
| Source | Flower picking rate1) | Leaf detachment rate2) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sum of Squares | Degree of freedom | Mean Squares | F | P | Sum of Squares | Degree of freedom | Mean Squares | F | P | |
| Model | 459.92 | 11 | 41.81 | 8.38 | 0.0011* | 430.52 | 11 | 39.14 | 10.10 | 0.0005* |
| A | 108.00 | 1 | 108.00 | 21.64 | 0.0009* | 40.33 | 1 | 40.33 | 10.41 | 0.0091* |
| B | 100.04 | 1 | 100.04 | 20.05 | 0.0012* | 2.34 | 1 | 2.34 | 0.60 | 0.4548 |
| C | 55.52 | 2 | 27.76 | 5.56 | 0.0238* | 347.84 | 2 | 173.92 | 44.88 | <0.0001* |
| AB | 1.50 | 1 | 1.50 | 0.30 | 0.5955 | 1.04 | 1 | 1.04 | 0.27 | 0.6154 |
| AC | 1.50 | 2 | 0.75 | 0.15 | 0.8624 | 12.71 | 2 | 6.35 | 1.64 | 0.2422 |
| BC | 8.75 | 2 | 4.37 | 0.88 | 0.4459 | 0.5373 | 2 | 0.27 | 0.07 | 0.9335 |
| A2 | 74.67 | 1 | 74.67 | 14.96 | 0.0031* | 1.52 | 1 | 1.52 | 4 | 0.5447 |
| B2 | 29.17 | 1 | 29.17 | 5.85 | 0.0362* | 4.02 | 1 | 4.02 | 1.07 | 0.3322 |
| Residual | 49.90 | 10 | 4.99 | / | / | 38.75 | 10 | 3.88 | / | / |
| Lack of fit | 42.57 | 5 | 8.51 | 5.08 | 0.0381 | 11.42 | 5 | 2.28 | 0.4177 | 0.8200 |
| Pure Error | 7.33 | 5 | 1.47 | / | / | 27.33 | 5 | 5.47 | / | / |
| Test No. | Flower picking rate(%) | Leaf detachment rate(%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 82.5 | 6.2 |
| 2 | 84.2 | 7.1 |
| 3 | 85.1 | 5.8 |
| 4 | 83.4 | 6.5 |
| 5 | 86 | 7.4 |
| 6 | 81.8 | 6 |
| 7 | 84.8 | 6.8 |
| 8 | 83.9 | 5.5 |
| 9 | 85.5 | 7 |
| 10 | 82.8 | 6.7 |
| Mean | 84 | 6.5 |
| SD | 1.36 | 0.61 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.