Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Dissolving Microneedles with Advanced Design–a Tool for Enhancing Skin Permeation of Naltrexone Hydrochloride

Submitted:

17 April 2026

Posted:

21 April 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Dissolving microneedles (DMN) could be considered as a promising platform for transdermal delivery of naltrexone hydrochloride (NTX), providing a minimally inva-sive alternative to conventional administration routes. In the present study, DMN patches with an advanced design were developed via a two-step micromoulding tech-nique. The systems were composed of drug-free polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) and poly-vinyl alcohol (PVA) blend microneedle tips, combined with a drug-loaded backing layer based on PVP and the thermoresponsive polymer Poloxamer 407. The influence of polymer concentration into DMN tips and backing layer composition on morpholo-gy, mechanical properties, drug release and permeation was evaluated. Mechanical studies as well as SEM observation revealed that intermediate polymer concentration (formulation MN-20%/2:1), used for DMN tips preparation, provided optimal mi-croneedle geometry, superior structural integrity and penetration efficiency. Incorpo-ration of NTX into backing layer allowed high and uniform drug loading. In vitro per-meation studies demonstrated significantly enhanced NTX delivery from DMN sys-tems compared to simple matrix patches, with the thermoresponsive backing layer contributing to controlled drug release. These findings highlight the importance of polymer composition in DMN design and demonstrate the potential of the developed systems as an effective platform for transdermal delivery of NTX.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Naltrexone (NTX) is a synthetic μ-opioid receptor antagonist widely used in the treatment of alcohol and opioid dependence [1]. At low doses, NTX has also been explored experimentally for chronic pain, autoimmune, and neurodegenerative disorders [2,3]. Oral administration remains the most common route of therapy, yet it is associated with important pharmacokinetic drawbacks [4]. Although absorption is rapid and nearly complete, extensive first-pass hepatic metabolism results in variable bioavailability (5–40%) and unstable plasma concentrations [5,6]. These limitations, combined with a relatively short half-life, reduce therapeutic efficacy. High doses further increase the risk of hepatotoxicity, while frequent gastrointestinal side effects compromise tolerability [7,8]. Moreover, poor adherence to daily dosing regimens significantly reduces clinical benefit [9]. Modified-release subcutaneous [10] and injectable depot formulations were developed to address these challenges, providing sustained monthly exposure and improved adherence [9,11,12]. However, their use are limited by injection-site reactions and pain and requires medical supervision [13]. Transdermal therapeutic systems offer a promising alternative. By bypassing first-pass metabolism, they reduce hepatotoxicity risk and provide more stable plasma profiles [14]. Additional benefits include convenient dosing intervals (e.g., daily or weekly application), improved tolerability and easily removal. These features highlight transdermal delivery as a particularly attractive strategy for future optimization of naltrexone therapy [15,16,17,18].
However, as the outermost layer of the skin, stratum corneum acts as a strong barrier to transdermal delivery, limiting the permeation of hydrophilic molecules such as naltrexone hydrochloride [19]. Microneedles (MN) have emerged as a promising approach to overcome the barrier posed by the stratum corneum. These devices, composed of microscopic needle-like projections, painlessly perforate the outermost skin layer, forming transient microchannels that enable efficient transport of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) into the dermis, including compounds that are otherwise hindered by the skin’s low permeability [20].
The use of microneedles for transdermal delivery of NTX has been extensively investigated in preclinical research. A common approach involves a two-step procedure in which solid MN are first used to create microchannels in the stratum corneum, followed by application of a semi-solid formulation or conventional transdermal patch [21,22,23,24]. Although this method enhances NTX penetration compare to passive patch application, it imposes significant demands on patient compliance, as proper execution of both steps is required [25,26]. This can be particularly challenging in populations with substance use disorders, where discomfort or improper use may compromise adherence. Moreover, the rapid in vivo closure of micropores limits the duration of drug permeation, thereby reducing the feasibility of sustained NTX delivery [24,27]. These limitations underscore the need for integrated delivery systems, such as dissolving or hydrogel-based MN, which can simultaneously breach the skin barrier and release the drug in a controlled manner, minimizing patient intervention and improving therapeutic outcomes.
In contrast, dissolving microneedles (DMN) represent an integrated alternative that combines skin penetration and controlled drug release within a single step. Fabricated from biocompatible, water-soluble polymers, DMN encapsulate the API within the needle matrix, which dissolves upon insertion into the skin. This eliminates the need for additional patches or formulations, reduces patient burden, and avoids residual sharp waste [28] .
Despite their advantages, DMN have inherent limitations that must be considered [29]. The amount of drug that can be loaded is often constrained by the mechanical strength required for successful skin penetration, and high drug loading can compromise needle integrity [30]. In practice, each microneedle typically contains only 25–60 μg of matrix material, and only a small fraction of this can be active drug [30,31]. Moreover, the rapid dissolution of the needles in the skin may lead to a relatively short duration of drug release, which can limit sustained delivery for therapeutics that require prolonged exposure. These factors collectively underscore the importance of careful material selection and design optimization in order to balance mechanical performance, drug loading capacity, and release kinetics [32].
A strategically innovative solution to overcome the intrinsic limitations of dissolving microneedles involves localizing the API within the backing layer rather than the needle tips. This configuration permits substantially higher overall drug loading without compromising the mechanical robustness required for efficient skin penetration [32]. By functioning as a reservoir, the backing layer facilitates controlled and sustained release of the encapsulated compound through the microchannels created by the microneedles, potentially enhancing therapeutic efficacy for drug requiring prolonged exposure [31].
Another recent strategy to optimize drug release is to utilize thermoresponsive polymers in the microneedle patches [33,34]. These polymers, such as poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) or poloxamers, undergo reversible phase transitions in response to temperature changes, typically forming a gel at skin temperature [35,36]. Incorporating such materials enables controlled, temperature-triggered, sustained, and potentially on-demand release of the encapsulated drug [37]. The in vivo polymer gelation at skin and body temperature followed by MN dissolution could also hinder micropores closure, ensuring longer and controlled duration of drug permeation.
The current study aimed to design and characterize dissolving microneedle patches with an advanced architecture to optimize both mechanical performance and drug delivery. The microneedle tips were composed of a PVP/PVA blend to balance strength, elasticity and penetration ability, while the backing layer consisted of PVP combined with the thermoresponsive polymer Poloxamer 407 and served as a reservoir for naltrexone hydrochloride. This design should enable higher drug loading, sustained release, and more consistent transdermal dosing, potentially improving therapeutic efficacy and patient adherence, while retaining the inherent advantages of dissolving microneedles, including painless, single-step application and elimination of sharps waste. A systematic formulation strategy was applied to evaluate the influence of a polymer concentration in MN tips and thermoresponsive components in the backing layer on the overall performance of the system. NTX was selected as a model drug due to its poor permeability and known delivery challenges, providing a clinically relevant framework for assessing the potential of the developed platform.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) Spectroscopy

The FT-IR spectra of the pure components and the corresponding API-excipient binary mixtures are presented in Figure 1. Naltrexone hydrochloride exhibited characteristic absorption bands corresponding to its molecular structure, including a broad band at 3100–3600 cm−1 attributed to O–H and N–H stretching, C–H stretching vibrations (aliphatic and aromatic groups) in the region of 3000–2850 cm−1, and a distinct peak at 1711 cm−1 assigned to C=O stretching of the ketone group. Additional bands observed between 1600 and 1500 cm−1 correspond to aromatic C=C vibrations. The observed spectrum is in good agreement with literature reports for naltrexone and its hydrochloride salt, confirming the presence of the expected functional groups [38,39].
Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) showed a characteristic C=O stretching band of the pyrrolidone ring at approximately 1657 cm−1, along with C–H stretching vibrations at 2950–2850 cm−1 and bands related to C–N and C–O vibrations in the region of 1500–1000 cm−1 [40]. Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) exhibited a broad O–H stretching band at 3200–3500 cm−1, C–H stretching vibrations near 2940–2900 cm−1, and characteristic C–O stretching bands in the region of 1220–1050 cm−1 [40,41].
Poloxamer 407 (P407) showed typical absorption bands corresponding to its poly(ethylene oxide)–poly(propylene oxide) structure, including O–H stretching vibrations at 3490 cm−1, C–H stretching at 2970 cm−1 and a prominent C–O–C stretching band at 1170 cm−1 [42,43].
Importantly, the FT-IR spectra of the binary mixtures did not reveal any significant shifts, disappearance, or appearance of new absorption bands compared to the individual components. This indicates the absence of chemical interactions between NTX and the investigated excipients, confirming their physicochemical compatibility within the developed formulations.

2.2. Preparation of Dissolving Microneedle Patches (DMN Patches) and Simple Matrix Patches (SP Patches)

The composition of the prepared DMN and SP patches is presented in Table 1.
Drug loading capacity and mechanical considerations determined the decision for incorporation of naltrexone hydrochloride only into the microneedle backing layer rather than into the needle tips [31]. Dissolving microneedle tips possess limited volume, which constrains the amount of API that can be incorporated and its uniformity of content. Moreover, inclusion of NTX directly into the tips may weaken the polymeric matrix, increase brittleness, and reduce insertion efficiency due to disruption of intermolecular interactions within the polymer network. Localizing NTX in the backing layer could be use as a tool for providing higher and more uniform drug loading without compromising mechanical strength and penetration ability [44]. Following insertion and dissolution of the drug-free MN tips, the backing layer could act as a reservoir, enabling NTX diffusion through the formed microchannels and thereby enhancing transdermal delivery without affecting mechanical integrity.
Dissolving microneedle systems should fulfil several requirements to ensure effective transdermal delivery. They must exhibit a balanced combination of mechanical strength, insertion ability, and controlled dissolution [45]. Sufficient mechanical resistance is required to allow successful penetration of the stratum corneum without any bending or breakage, while maintaining structural integrity during handling and application. At the same time, the tips should not be too brittle, as this may cause fractures and incomplete drug delivery. Efficient penetration depends on balanced stiffness and tip sharpness, enabling the formation of reproducible microchannels in the skin without causing pain. Besides this, after insertion, rapid and predictable dissolution of the microneedle tips within the viable epidermis is required for complete drug release.
The selection of a polymer blend in the present study (PVP and PVA) for the microneedle tips was based on their complementary physicochemical and mechanical properties. PVP is a highly water-soluble, biocompatible polymer that gives clear films and enables rapid dissolution and drug release following insertion. However, many literature data suggest that PVP alone may produce brittle structures with limited mechanical strength [46]. PVA alone also is generally not considered an optimal material for dissolving microneedle tips. Even thought, PVA contributes improved mechanical strength and flexibility due to its semi-crystalline structure and hydrogen-bonding capacity, enhancing resistance to deformation during insertion [46], it has slower dissolution and insufficient brittleness, which may compromise rapid needle dissolution and reliable mechanical performance during skin insertion [47,48]. The combination of PVP and PVA in a proper ratio has been shown to produce microneedles with better mechanical and dissolution performance than either polymer alone [46,48]. Both polymers exhibit good aqueous processability and compatibility, enabling homogeneous blending and reproducible micromould casting procedure and in the same time they are considered as generally safety. The PVP/PVA blend is considered to ensure improved mechanical strength through intramolecular interactions (e.g., hydrogen bonding), providing a more robust network than either polymer alone [46,48]. Thus, the PVP/PVA blend appears to provide an optimized polymer matrix that meets the fundamental requirements for dissolving microneedles, namely sufficient mechanical integrity for effective penetration, controlled dissolution within the skin, and reliable manufacturing performance [47].
Considering the literature data as well as our preliminary studies, the design of the microneedle tips in the present study was optimized by varying the total concentration of the PVP:PVA polymer blend (10%, 20%, and 30% w/w), while the polymer ratio was kept constant 2:1. Increasing polymer concentration is expected to improve mechanical strength and resistance to deformation during insertion. However, higher concentrations may also increase viscosity, compromise satisfactory mould filling and slow dissolution. Thus, evaluating different polymer levels allows determination of an optimal balance between insertion efficiency and dissolution rate.
The backing layer plays a critical role in microneedle systems by serving as a reservoir for the API and supporting sustained delivery after skin penetration. In addition, it provides structural support to the microneedle array and allowing adequate delivery. Thereby its proper composition is of great importance for overall patch performance. The selection of Poloxamer 407 and PVP for the backing layer was based on their complementary physicochemical properties and their contribution to controlled drug delivery. PVP provides film-forming ability and structural stability, whereas Poloxamer 407 contributes flexibility and modulates hydration and drug diffusion. Poloxamer 407 is an amphiphilic triblock copolymer that exhibits thermosensitive behavior, undergoing sol–gel transition at approximately body temperature [43,49,50]. Following skin application, the hydrated backing layer containing poloxamer could partially gel, forming a more structured network [23]. The thermally induced gelation within the skin may help maintain the patency of the microchannels created by the dissolving microneedles, preventing their rapid closure and thereby prolonging drug diffusion. Moreover, the gel-like structure can function as a localized reservoir, sustaining NTX release and enhancing its permeation through the microchannels. By adjusting the PVP:Poloxamer 407 ratio (2:1 and 1:1) at a constant total polymer concentration (30%), it is possible to modulate matrix flexibility, hydration dynamics, gel strength, which could affect drug release kinetics. Thus, the combination of PVP and Poloxamer 407 could be considered as a rational design strategy to obtain a mechanically stable, thermoresponsive backing layer capable of supporting prolonged and enhanced transdermal delivery following microneedle insertion.
The effectiveness of the microneedles fabrication process using the PDMS mould combined with centrifugal casting was verified by determination of initial tips height via digital light microscopic examination (results, presented in Figure 2) as well as SEM observation (Figure 3). Each mould consisted of a 100 microneedle tips with an overall surface area of approximately 10 × 10 mm2. The produced microneedle arrays closely reproduced the dimensions and geometry of the mould cavities, exhibiting an average height of about 700 µm.
The initial height of the fabricated microneedle tips was expected to be close to the mould cavity depth of 700 µm. However, slight variations among formulations were anticipated due to differences in polymer concentration and solution viscosity. Since the geometry of the mould was identical for all formulations, deviations in needle height can primarily be attributed to polymer solid content, mould-filling efficiency during centrifugation, and shrinkage occurring during solvent evaporation [46]. The results showed, that the final microneedle length (around 600 µm) was shorter than the original 700 µm master mold depth due to the solvent evaporation, polymer network rearrangement and compaction which led to polymer shrinkage during drying. This phenomenon is typically observed in DMN production via micromoulding techniques based on hydrophilic polymers like PVP and PVA [47,51,52].
In addition, the results demonstrated a clear influence of polymer concentration and backing layer composition on the final microneedle height. The MN-10%/2:1 formulation exhibited the lowest height (538 µm), which is consistent with the expected higher shrinkage associated with lower polymer solid content in the microneedle tips. The increased proportion of solvent in the 10% formulation likely led to greater volumetric contraction during drying, resulting in shorter final structures [46]. Both 20% formulations showed the highest microneedle heights, with MN-20%/1:1 reaching 623 µm and MN-20%/2:1 reaching 641 µm. These values suggested an optimal replication of the mould geometry at intermediate polymer concentration. The higher solid content compared to the 10% formulation likely reduced shrinkage while maintaining sufficient flowability during centrifugation, allowing effective filling of the mould cavities. The slightly greater height observed for the 2:1 backing layer ratio may indicate subtle differences in structural support or drying behaviour, although the effect appeared modest. Interestingly, the MN-30%/2:1 formulation showed a lower height (574 µm) than both 20% systems, despite having the highest polymer concentration. This finding suggests that increased viscosity at 30% may have hindered complete cavity filling during centrifugation. Reduced flowability and potential air entrapment in the mould tips could have resulted in slightly shorter tips, offsetting the expected reduction in shrinkage [53]. Therefore, balanced polymer concentration is required for reduced shrinkage, optimal viscosity and adequate cavity filling. The further SEM examination was performed in order to support the observation from digital light microscope.

2.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) of DMN Patches

SEM observation was utilize to study the micromorphology of the prepared DMN patch formulations, containing 10%, 20% or 30% polymer concentration. As it could be seen from the SEM images in Figure 3A-C all formulations possessed pyramidal tips with a smooth surface. A small number of shorten, truncated or blunted tips or arrays with tip-curling phenomenon was observed in the SEM images of formulations with 10% and 30% polymer concentration (Figure 3D,F). The reduction in microneedle tips height could be explained by different mechanical factors affecting mould filling, structural integrity, and drying behaviour [54].
Formulations at both the lowest and highest polymer concentrations (MN-10%/2:1 and MN-30%/2:1) produced noticeably shorter MN tips. At low polymer concentration (10%), the formulation typically has low viscosity and reduced solid content. This can lead to incomplete filling of the micromoulds, especially at the tip regions, due to insufficient capillary force and poor retention of material within the cavities. In addition, during drying, the high water content results in significant solvent evaporation, causing pronounced volumetric shrinkage and collapse of the polymer matrix. The low mechanical strength of the resulting structure further contributes to deformation or partial flattening of the microneedle tips, leading to reduced height [54]. A tip-curling phenomenon, observed for some of the MN tips of this formulation, could be attributed to greater overall shrinkage, faster and more uneven solvent evaporation, and lower mechanical stiffness of the partially formed microneedles [55]. Upon early stages of drying, when the structure is still soft, it is more susceptible to deformation [56,57]. Higher polymer concentration, used in formulation MN-30%/2:1, provided extremely high solution viscosity which could hinder efficient mould filling [58]. The increased resistance to flow prevents the formulation from fully penetrating into the narrow tip regions of the mould, resulting in shorter or blunted microneedles [59,60]. At intermediate (20%) polymer concentration, as in MN-20%/2:1 formulation, a balance between viscosity, mould filling, and mechanical integrity was probably achieved, allowing complete cavity filling and uniform solidification. This resulted in well-formed microneedles with optimal height and morphology, as observed in the SEM images (Figure 3E).

2.4. The Assay of API

The API content in the prepared patches (DMN and SP) was determined in order to evaluate the accuracy of the formulation process and the uniformity of drug incorporation within the polymer matrix. The obtained results (Table 2) confirmed that all formulations contained NTX close to the theoretical values, indicating good reproducibility of the fabrication method and satisfactory content uniformity, complying with the requirement for transdermal dosage forms.
Assessment of drug content is essential for microneedle systems, since they offer a limited volume of individual microneedle tips hindering the uniform drug loading [29,61]. In many dissolving microneedle formulations where the API is incorporated directly into the needles, variations in filling efficiency and incomplete mould cavity filling may lead to heterogeneity in drug distribution [62]. In the present study, NTX was incorporated only into the backing layer. This design provided several advantages considering formulation accuracy and dose uniformity. Since the backing layer represented the largest volume fraction of the patch, drug incorporation into this component allowed more homogeneous distribution of the API throughout the matrix. As a result, the risk of dose variability associated with the limited capacity of microneedle tips was minimized. Moreover, localization of the drug within the backing layer allows the microneedles to act primarily as structural elements responsible for the creation of microchannels across the skin, while the backing layer functions as a drug reservoir release the API through the formed diffusion pathways.
The satisfactory drug content results obtained for all formulations therefore confirm both the reliability of the preparation method and the suitability of the selected design strategy. Incorporating NTX into the backing layer contributed to improved dose uniformity and provided a smart solution to the common challenges associated with drug loading in microneedle-based delivery systems.

2.5. In Vitro Gelation Temperature and Gelling Time

The thermoresponsive behavior of the poloxamer-containing systems was investigated in order to predict their potential in situ behaviour after application of the microneedle patches [43]. Although the developed formulations are solid films, upon insertion and subsequent exposure to interstitial skin fluids, the polymer matrix is expected to hydrate and undergo structural transformation. In this context, evaluation of gelation temperature and gelling time should provide useful information about the formation of a gel-like layer that may influence API diffusion and release kinetics.
The ability of Poloxamer 407 to undergo temperature-induced sol–gel transition is well documented and is attributed to the formation and packing of micelles at certain temperatures [63]. At lower temperatures, the polymer chains are hydrated and exist as unimers, while increasing temperature enables dehydration of the polypropylene oxide blocks, leading to micellization and subsequent gel formation [64]. This transition typically occurs in the range of skin surface temperature, making Poloxamer 407 applicable for transdermal delivery [43].
Table 3 contains data about the determined gelation temperature and gelling time of the prepared poloxamer solutions (preparation described in Methods secrion). The obtained results demonstrated that all investigated formulations exhibited gelation temperatures within a narrow range close to physiological skin temperature. The gelation temperature of the NTX containing PVP:Poloxamer 407 (2:1) system was 34.2 °C, while a lower value of 31.6 °C was observed for the 1:1 ratio formulation. The decrease in gelation temperature with increasing poloxamer content could be explained by the higher availability of amphiphilic chains, which facilitates micelle formation and promotes earlier gelation [65]. The presence of a higher proportion of PVP appeared to shift the gelation temperature slightly upward, likely due to interference with micellar organization and increased system hydrophilicity [49]. A similar trend was observed for the API-free systems, with gelation temperatures of 33.9 °C and 30.8 °C for the 2:1 and 1:1 ratio, respectively. The inclusion of naltrexone hydrochloride resulted in a slight increase in gelation temperature for both compositions, suggesting a modest interaction between the drug and the polymeric network. This effect may be attributed to changes in solvent structure or weak interactions that prevent from micelle aggregation, although the magnitude of the shift remained relatively small, indicating that the thermogelling behavior is largely preserved [66].
The gelation time measurements at 35 °C further supported these observations. The PVP:Poloxamer 407 (1:1) formulation exhibited significantly faster gelation (9.17 s) compared to the 2:1 system (17.53 s), which was consistent with its lower gelation temperature and higher poloxamer content. The API-free formulations followed the same trend, with slightly shorter gelation times (8.32 s and 15.97 s, respectively). The presence of NTX led to a modest increase in gelation time, again suggesting a minor delay in micelle packing and network formation.
The solution containing 30% polymer blend of PVP:PVA (2:1) is not expected to exhibit thermoresponsive gelation within the studied temperature range, as neither polymer possesses temperature-induced gelling properties (data not shown).
Despite the differences between the formulations, all of them gelled at or near skin temperature and within a short time interval. This straighten the hypothesis that, upon hydration in the skin environment, a viscous gel layer is possible to be formed. This behaviour is expected to contribute to controlled drug diffusion and may explain the sustained release and permeation profiles observed for the corresponding microneedle systems. Moreover, after MN tips dissolution, in situ gelled poloxamer could be able to hinder micropores closure.

2.6. Mechanical Properties

2.6.1. Three-Point Bend Testing of SP Patches

The mechanical properties of the backing layer play a critical role in the overall performance of DMN patches. Beyond serving as a structural support for the microneedle tips, the backing layer contributes to the uniform application of force during insertion, ensuring efficient penetration of the microneedles into the skin. In addition, it affects patient handling, patch integrity during application, and, in systems where the drug is incorporated into the backing layer, it could also influence API release and diffusion behaviour. Therefore, the composition of the backing layer must be carefully optimized to achieve a balance between both sufficient mechanical strength and flexibility [67]. Three-point bend testing was used to evaluate the mechanical properties of prepared simple matrix patches (Figure 4), corresponding to the backing layer compositions, as it provides insight into their behaviour under deformation conditions similar to those encountered during patch application [68]. In this context, hardness reflects the maximum force required to deform the film and is indicative of its resistance to bending. Flexibility corresponds to the extent of deformation prior to fracture and represents the ability of the film to bend without breaking. Toughness describes the total energy required to induce failure and is derived from the area under the force–displacement curve, thus integrating both strength and flexibility.
The results demonstrated a clear influence of polymer composition on the mechanical properties of the prepared films. The formulation containing PVP:PVA (2:1) exhibited the highest hardness (1721 g), indicating a strong resistance to deformation. The combination of PVP and PVA provides mechanically robust matrix, where the semi crystalline nature of PVA contributes to increased hardness and structural strength through intermolecular hydrogen bonding [69,70,71,72,73]. PVP enables the formation of homogeneous and dense polymer matrix due to its amorphous nature and strong intermolecular interactions [74]. However, without additional plasticisation, its relatively limited chain mobility may reduce flexibility (0.56 mm or 560 m), suggesting a relatively brittle structure with a reduced ability to accommodate deformation. Consequently, its toughness (1063 g/mm) was lower compared to the poloxamer-containing systems [75].
In contrast, the incorporation of Poloxamer 407 significantly modified the mechanical behaviour of the films. Both PVP:P407 formulations displayed reduced hardness but a marked increase in flexibility. This can be explained by the plasticizing effect of poloxamer, which reduces intermolecular interactions within the polymer matrix and enhances chain mobility [76,77,78]. The lowest hardness and highest flexibility value of PVP:P407 (1:1) formulation is an indication for a highly deformable and soft material. The reduction in resistance to applied force limited the PVP:P407 (1:1) formulation overall mechanical robustness. Although the toughness (1574 g/mm) remained relatively high due to the large deformation before fracture, it was lower than that of the 2:1 formulation, suggesting that excessive plasticization compromised the balance between strength and flexibility [69].
Notably, formulation PVP:P407 (2:1) exhibited the highest toughness (1806 g/mm), suggesting an optimal balance between strength and deformability. The ability to sustain moderate force while undergoing substantial deformation results in improved energy absorption, which is desirable for maintaining integrity during handling and application [79].
Overall, the results indicated that polymer composition strongly governed the mechanical performance of the backing layers. While PVP and PVA contributed to rigidity and strength, poloxamer enhanced flexibility through its plasticizing effect [78,80]. Among the tested formulations, the PVP:P407 (2:1) system appeared to provide the most favourable combination of mechanical properties, combining sufficient hardness with enhanced flexibility and maximal toughness. This balance is particularly important for microneedle patch application, where the backing layer must be strong enough to support insertion while remaining flexible enough to conform to the skin without fracturing.

2.6.2. Mechanical Strength of DMN Patches (Fracture Force Test)

Successful transdermal drug delivery using dissolving microneedle technology depends fundamentally on the ability of the MN tips to reliably pierce the stratum corneum, which represents the primary barrier of the skin. For consistent and reproducible insertion, MN arrays must possess adequate mechanical robustness to withstand the compressive forces applied during manual or device-assisted administration. Insufficient mechanical strength may result in bending, blunting, or fracture of the needle shafts, ultimately compromising penetration efficiency and drug delivery performance [19,31,81].
The mechanical performance of dissolving polymeric MN patches is strongly influenced by the intrinsic properties of the polymers used, including polymer blending ration, concentration, molecular weight, degree of crosslinking and hydrogen bonding interactions within the matrix. In addition, the incorporation of API or plasticizing excipients can significantly alter the rigidity, brittleness, and elasticity of the microneedles. Drug loading may disrupt intermolecular interactions within the polymer network, potentially reducing mechanical resistance, whereas certain excipients may either reinforce or plasticize the structure depending on their physicochemical characteristics.
For these reasons, mechanical characterization represents a critical preliminary step in the evaluation of MN systems before proceeding to ex vivo skin permeation or in vivo studies. Standardized mechanical testing provides insight into the resistance of the microneedles to compression and helps predicting their likelihood of successful skin insertion under practical application conditions.
The mechanical strength of the DMN patch formulations was evaluated by measuring the reduction in needle height after application of a compressive force of 32 N. The initial height (H1) and post-compression height (H2) were determined microscopically, and the percentage reduction in height was calculated to assess structural deformation (Table 4).
The good overall appearance of all formulations could be attributed to their composition and successful fabrication method. The use of a PVA–PVP blend in microneedle preparation could enhance the mechanical performance of the formulation through intermolecular interactions between the two polymers. Specifically, hydrogen bonding occurs between the hydroxyl (-OH) groups of PVA and the carbonyl (-C=O) groups of PVP, leading to the formation of a more cohesive and structurally stable microneedle matrix [82].
The results demonstrated a clear inverse relationship between polymer concentration in the microneedle tips and percentage height reduction after compression. The MN-10%/2:1 formulation exhibited the greatest reduction in height, decreasing from 538 µm to 267 µm, corresponding to a 50% reduction. This pronounced deformation indicated limited mechanical strength, which can be attributed to the low total polymer concentration (10%) in the microneedle tips. The lower solid content likely resulted in a less dense polymeric network, reducing resistance to compressive stress and increasing susceptibility to structural collapse. Increasing polymer content significantly improved mechanical performance. The higher solid content limited deformation under stress and increases robustness likely due to reduced porosity and enabled chain entanglement within the matrix. As a result, height reduction of formulations with 20% and 30% polymer concentration was below 17%. The lowest percentage reduction observed for MN-20%/2:1 suggested that this composition provided a more mechanically stable structure, potentially due to differences in polymer distribution or intermolecular interactions within the blend. Better mechanical performance of the backing layer of this composition (compared with MN-20%/1:1 backing layer) could also contribute to the tips mechanical strength, since backing layer supported the insertion during application [83,84,85,86,87].

2.6.3. Parafilm Penetration Test of DMN Patches

Since the use of biological skin models introduces variability related to tissue heterogeneity, hydration state, and possesses ethical restrictions, synthetic insertion models are frequently employed during early-stage testing. Parafilm® M is commonly used as a reproducible and convenient skin simulant due to its multilayered structure and uniform thickness. When folded into defined layers, it enables estimation of insertion depth by assessing the number of layers perforated under controlled loading conditions. Microscopic evaluation of the resulting microperforations allows quantitative assessment of penetration efficiency and comparative mechanical performance among different formulations, providing a practical and standardized approach for preliminary insertion studies [87].
The insertion ability of the DMN patch formulations was evaluated using a Parafilm® M model, consisting of 8 eight layers, where the number of pores formed in each layer was counted as an indicator of penetration efficiency and depth. Since each Parafilm layer has an approximate thickness of 127 µm, penetration up to the fourth layer corresponds to an insertion depth of about 500 µm, which is generally considered sufficient to cross the stratum corneum and reach viable epidermal regions.
As it could be seen from Figure 5, the MN-10%/2:1 formulation demonstrated limited insertion performance. Although 89 pores were observed in the first layer, the number decreased markedly in the second (46 pores) and third layers (5 pores), with no perforation detected in the fourth and fifth layer. This shallow penetration profile indicated insufficient mechanical strength to maintain structural integrity during insertion. These findings are in agreement with the fracture force test, where this formulation exhibited the highest height reduction (50.37%) after application of 32 N, confirming substantial deformation under compressive stress. The high degree of structural collapse likely reduced the effective insertion depth.
In contrast, both 20% polymer formulations showed markedly improved penetration efficiency. MN-20%/1:1 produced 94, 86, 79, and 23 pores in layers one to four, respectively, with minimal penetration into the fifth layer. Similarly, MN-20%/2:1 generated 98, 90, 85, and 71 pores across the first four layers and 11 pores in the fifth layer. These results indicated consistent and deep insertion, reaching approximately 500–630 µm. The improved performance correlates well with the compression data, where these formulations exhibited good height reductions (17.61% and 13.57%, respectively), demonstrating sufficient mechanical robustness to resist deformation while maintaining adequate sharpness for efficient penetration. The superior performance of MN-20%/2:1, compared to MN-20%/1:1, in deeper layers is consistent with its lower percentage height reduction in the mechanical test and could be attributed to the higher toughness of its backing layer, enabling better mechanical support.
The MN-30%/2:1 formulation showed high pore numbers in the first three layers (92, 80, and 71), but a sharp decrease in the fourth layer (only 7 pores) and no penetration into the fifth layer. Although this formulation exhibited the sufficiently small height reduction in the fracture force test (15.34%), indicating good resistance to compression, its penetration depth did not surpass that of the 20% formulations. This suggests that excessive polymer concentration, while increasing stiffness, may compromise insertion efficiency. Increased viscosity during fabrication leaded to formation of truncated and blunted tips, affecting their height and sharpness [88,89,90]. These findings support the selection of the 20% polymer blend, consisting of PVA and PVP (2:1) as the most promising configuration for achieving reliable skin insertion. Moreover, the optimal patch formulation complies with the requirements for painless application, since the tips height is enough to theoretically penetration through the outer skin layers and reach the dermis without contacting nerve endings, thereby minimizing or avoiding pain [19,91,92,93,94].

2.7. In Vitro Release Study

The in vitro release profiles of the developed formulations demonstrated a clear influence of polymer composition and physicochemical properties on the dissolution behaviour of naltrexone hydrochloride (Figure 6). Since NTX is a highly water-soluble compound, the release rate from the investigated systems should be primarily governed by hydration, swelling, and dissolution of the polymer matrices rather than by drug solubility limitations.
The results demonstrated that the differences in the release behaviour of NTX from the prepared systems were mainly governed by PVP to Poloxamer 407 ratio. The rapid release observed for the matrix patches composed of PVP and PVA can be explained by the hydrophilic nature and high aqueous solubility of these polymers. PVP readily dissolves in aqueous media, leading to rapid matrix disintegration and formation of aqueous channels that facilitate drug diffusion. Upon contact with the dissolution medium, PVA first undergoes hydration and swelling, followed by gradual dissolution. The combination of these two polymers therefore resulted in rapid hydration of the matrix, followed by progressive erosion, which enabled fast diffusion of the incorporated API. Consequently, the PVP/PVA matrix patches demonstrated the fastest release rate among the investigated systems.
In contrast, the patches in which the NTX was incorporated into PVP/P407 matrix (both DMN and SP formulations) exhibited a slower drug release compared with the PVP/PVA systems. Poloxamer 407 is an amphiphilic triblock copolymer composed of polyethylene oxide and polypropylene oxide segments, which is known for its thermoresponsive behavior. Upon contact with dissolution medium, at temperatures approaching physiological conditions (approximately 37 °C), poloxamer solutions undergo micellization followed by formation of a viscous gel-like structure. This thermosensitive gelation increases the viscosity of the hydrated matrix and can create a temporary diffusion barrier for drug molecules. The formation of a hydrated polymer network likely prolonged the diffusion pathway of the drug, resulting in a more gradual release profile [49,66,95,96,97,98]. However, as the matrix hydrated and polymer chains dispersed, the local concentration of poloxamer decreased below the critical gelation threshold, resulting in gradual erosion and complete dissolution of the film [99,100].
These findings suggest that the physicochemical properties of the polymers, particularly their hydration rate, viscosity development, and dissolution characteristics, strongly influence drug liberation from the matrix. Moreover, since polymer hydration determines the formation of aqueous diffusion pathways within the matrix, the solubility of the polymeric components is also expected to affect the subsequent permeability and diffusion of the drug.
The microneedle-based patch formulations exhibited similar release behaviour with their corresponding simple matrix patches. In these systems, NTX was incorporated into the backing layer composed of Poloxamer 407 and PVP, while the MN tips consisted of PVP and PVA. Upon contact with the dissolution medium, the hydrophilic PVP/PVA tips rapidly hydrated and dissolved, allowing the medium to penetrate the backing layer and promote drug release. However, since the drug was not located directly in the microneedle tips, the release process required hydration of the backing layer, which delayed the onset of drug diffusion compared with the rapidly dissolving PVP/PVA matrix patches.
Even though not so significant, the polymer concentration in the microneedle tips also influence NTX release from the prepared DMN parches. Increasing the polymer concentration in the tips from 10% to 30% resulted in progressively slower drug release. Higher polymer content generally produces a denser polymeric network with reduced porosity and slower hydration, which can delay the penetration of the dissolution medium into the microneedle structure.
The obtained results indicate that the dissolution behaviour of the investigated systems is strongly influenced by the solubility and hydration properties of the polymers used in the formulations. Highly water-soluble polymers such as PVP promoted rapid matrix erosion and fast drug release, while polymers capable of forming viscous or gel-like structures, such as Poloxamer 407, tended to slow the release process by creating diffusion barriers. These polymer-related effects are further expected to influence subsequent permeation behaviour, since the rate of NTX liberation from the formulation determines the concentration gradient driving diffusion across the membrane. Consequently, formulations with faster polymer dissolution are likely to generate higher drug availability at the membrane surface, which may enhance the overall permeation rate.

2.8. In Vitro Permeability Study

In vitro permeation studies represent a critical step in the evaluation of topical and transdermal drug delivery systems, including microneedle (DMN) patches, as they provide essential information about the ability of the API to cross the skin barrier and reach the systemic circulation or deeper skin layers. Such studies allow the assessment of formulation performance, drug release from the dosage form, and the influence of excipients on drug transport under controlled experimental conditions. For this purpose, synthetic membranes are often employed as alternatives to biological tissues in order to reduce variability and improve experimental reproducibility. In the present study, permeation experiments were performed using the Strat-M membrane, a multilayered artificial membrane designed to mimic the structural and diffusional characteristics of human skin. This membrane consists of a lipid-treated dense surface layer supported by porous polymeric layers that simulate the barrier properties of the stratum corneum and deeper skin regions. Compared with excised human or animal skin, Strat-M offers several practical advantages, including minimal batch-to-batch variability, improved safety, easier handling, and long-term storage stability, while still providing permeation profiles that correlate well with those obtained from biological membranes. These characteristics make Strat-M a reliable and widely used model for the preliminary screening and comparative evaluation of transdermal formulations such as microneedle patches [101,102,103,104].
The obtained permeation profiles (Figure 7) demonstrated clear differences between conventional matrix patches and microneedle-assisted systems, highlighting the critical role of microneedles in enhancing transmembrane drug delivery. All simple matrix patch formulations exhibited relatively low and insufficient permeation throughout the 24 h experiment, confirming the limited diffusion of NTX across the membrane when the skin barrier is not mechanically disrupted [105]. However, a noticeable difference between the polymer matrices was observed. The patch composed of the PVP:PVA (SP-PVP:PVA) blend demonstrated higher permeation compared with the PVP:P407 formulations. Similar with the observation already made from the in vitro dissolution studies, this behaviour could be attributed to the physicochemical characteristics and the nature of polymers [106].
In comparison with the simple matrix patches, all DMN patch formulations demonstrated markedly enhanced permeation, confirming the ability of microneedles to overcome the primary barrier function of the stratum corneum. By creating microscopic channels across the membrane, the microneedles provide direct pathways for drug diffusion, significantly reducing the diffusional resistance of the barrier layer. Once the membrane in vitro (or stratum corneum in vivo) is disrupted, hydrophilic drugs can rapidly diffuse through the formed pores [107]. As a result, the cumulative amount of permeated drug from microneedle patches was substantially higher than that observed for the conventional patches during the entire experimental period [105,108,109,110]. Despite the improved permeation provided by DMN patches, the permeation profiles displayed a short lag phase during the initial stage of the experiment. The observed lag-time before the steady-state flux is common event for DMN formulations and depend on formulation and pore formation kinetics [109,111]. This phenomenon in the prepared systems can be attributed to the design of the prepared systems, in which the API was incorporated into the backing layer (not the microneedle tips). Upon application, the microneedle tips rapidly dissolve upon contact with the aqueous medium, creating microchannels within the membrane [29]. However, since the drug is located in the backing layer, an additional diffusion step is required for the drug molecules to migrate through the hydrated polymer matrix and reach the microchannels. This results in the observed lag time before significant permeation occurs (Figure 8A).
The composition of the microneedle tips also influenced the permeation behaviour. Except from formulation MN-10%/2:1, the observations are consistent with the results obtained from the in vitro release studies, where higher polymer concentrations in the tips may lead to higher viscosity, slower dissolution and slightly delayed pore formation, which can moderate the early permeation rate [106]. Nevertheless, once the microneedles were dissolved and the microchannels were established, the influence of the tip composition became less significant. Despite the observed faster in vitro dissolution rate of NTX from formulation MN-10%/2:1, the in vitro permeation rate through Strat-M membrane was significantly low, compared to the other DMN patches. This could be attributed to the lower insertion ability and mechanical strength determined for this formulation. Lower polymer concentration reflected in production of mechanically shorter, truncated and brittle tips with poor penetration efficiency, preventing the formation of sufficient micro channels in Strat-M membrane. Strat-M thickness (300 µm) is higher than the deepest insertion layer, which could be reached by MN-10%/2:1 patch, making insertion inefficient (Figure 8B). These findings indicated that drug permeation in microneedle systems was primarily governed by insertion efficiency rather than release rate alone. Despite the faster release profile, insufficient penetration and limited microchannel formation significantly restricted overall drug transport across the membrane.
At later stages of the experiment, the permeation behavior was predominantly governed by the composition of the backing layer, which serves as the drug reservoir. Differences between formulations with varying polymer ratios in the backing layer were therefore observed. Systems containing higher proportions of poloxamer showed significantly reduced permeation compared with those containing lower amounts of this polymer. This can be explained by the thermosensitive behavior of poloxamer, which leads to the formation of a more viscous hydrated matrix at physiological temperature, thereby slowing drug diffusion through the backing layer. Besides this, another possible reason for the unsatisfactory permeation behaviour of composition MN-20%/1:1, could be the observed lower toughness, determined for the backing layer of this formulation, compromising adequate support insertion during microneedle patch application. In contrast, formulation with higher proportions of PVP (MN-20%/2:1) facilitated faster polymer hydration and dissolution, resulting in enhanced drug transport. Thus, the backing layer composition is of highly importance influencing insertion, diffusion and permeation [67]. These findings highlight the importance of optimizing both structural components of the microneedle patch in order to achieve an optimal balance between rapid channel formation and controlled drug release from the polymeric reservoir. Thus, the overall performance of the system is determined by the combined effect of microneedle tip properties, which govern insertion and microchannel formation, and backing layer characteristics, which control drug release and subsequent diffusion through the created pathways.

2.9. Stability Study

Stability evaluation was performed for the optimized microneedle formulation MN-20%/2:1 in order to assess the potential influence of environmental conditions, considering humidity, on the mechanical integrity of the system during storage. This formulation was selected for the stability study because it demonstrated the most favourable balance between mechanical performance and permeation behaviour. The parameters monitored during storage were the percentage reduction in microneedle height after compression testing, Parafilm penetration ability and API assay [112,113].
The samples were stored at 25 °C under two controlled relative humidity conditions, namely 43% RH and 86% RH. These environments were chosen to simulate moderate and high humidity conditions that may be encountered during storage and handling of microneedle patches. Humidity is a critical factor for polymeric dissolving microneedles because the hydrophilic polymers commonly used in their composition can absorb moisture from the surrounding environment. Water uptake may lead to polymer plasticization, increased chain mobility, and a consequent reduction in mechanical stiffness, which could negatively affect their mechanical properties [113,114].
The microneedle tips in the optimized formulation are composed of a blend of PVP and PVA. PVP is known to be highly hygroscopic due to the presence of lactam groups capable of forming hydrogen bonds with water molecules, which makes it particularly susceptible to humidity-induced plasticization [85,115]. In contrast, PVA possesses a partially crystalline structure that provides improved mechanical rigidity and can partially counteract the softening effect caused by moisture uptake. The backing layer of the system contains a blend of PVP and Poloxamer 407. Poloxamer 407 is less hygroscopic in the solid state and generally exhibits good physical stability [116].
The obtained results (Figure 9) demonstrated that the percentage reduction in microneedle height remained relatively constant throughout the four-week storage period under both humidity conditions. At 43% RH, the height reduction values varied only slightly from 13.57% at week 0 to 13.21% at week 4. Similarly, under the more stressful condition of 86% RH, the values ranged from 13.57% initially to 12.87% after four weeks. These minor fluctuations are very small and fall within the typical experimental variability of mechanical testing. Considering penetration ability (Figure 11), the formulation MN-20%/2:1 demonstrated no statistically significant changes in the insertion efficiency upon storage for four weeks at neither humidity level.
Figure 9. Height reduction (%) of MN-20%/2:1 patch formulation under different humidity level at 0, 2 and 4 weeks, mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 9. Height reduction (%) of MN-20%/2:1 patch formulation under different humidity level at 0, 2 and 4 weeks, mean ± SD (n = 3).
Preprints 208938 g009
Figure 10. Parafilm penetration test (number of holes per Parafilm layer) of MN-20%/2:1 patch formulation under different humidity level at 0, 2 and 4 weeks, mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 10. Parafilm penetration test (number of holes per Parafilm layer) of MN-20%/2:1 patch formulation under different humidity level at 0, 2 and 4 weeks, mean ± SD (n = 3).
Preprints 208938 g010
Figure 11. Schematic visualization of the preparation of DMN patches via two-step micromoulding technique.
Figure 11. Schematic visualization of the preparation of DMN patches via two-step micromoulding technique.
Preprints 208938 g011
The results demonstrate that the optimized MN-20%/2:1 formulation maintained stable mechanical characteristics during storage under both humidity conditions. The statistically insignificant changes in the percentage height reduction and insertion efficiency confirmed that the microneedle structure remains mechanically robust, suggesting that the formulation possesses adequate physical stability for further development and evaluation [88,92].
The assay of API from MN-20%/2:1 patch formulation, stored at different humidity level, did not show any statistically significant changes, compared with the initial value (data not shown), suggesting again sufficient stability.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Naltrexone hydrochloride (NTX), supplied by INCHEM LABORATORIES PVT. Ltd. (India) was used as a model drug. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) with molecular weight (Mr) of 58 kDa and Poloxamer 407 (Pluronic® F127) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich Chemie GmbH (Steinheim, Germany). Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) with Mr 30 kDa was purchased from Fluka Chemie GmbH (Buchs, Switzerland). Strat-M® membranes were obtained from Merck Millipore. All other reagents and solvents were of analytical grade and used as received. Deionized water was used for all preparations.

3.2. Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy

Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was employed to observe the potential physicochemical interactions between naltrexone hydrochloride and the selected excipients – PVP, PVA and Poloxamer 407. Spectral analysis was performed using a Nicolet Impact 400D FT-IR spectrometer (Thermo Scientific Nicolet, Waltham, MA, USA). Spectra were acquired within the wavenumber range of 4000–400 cm−1 at a spectral resolution of 4 cm−1. Binary physical mixtures were prepared by mixing pure NTX with each excipient at ratios corresponding to those employed in the respective model formulations. The prepared mixtures were transferred into 5 mL glass vials, hermetically sealed, and stored in thermostatic chamber at 60 °C for 15 days. Following storage, FTIR spectra were recorded and compared with those of the individual components to detect potential shifts, disappearance, or emergence of characteristic absorption bands.

3.3. Preparation of Dissolving Microneedle Patches (DMN Patches)

Dissolving microneedle patches were prepared via utilization of a two-step micromoulding technique, including tips and backing layer casting as presented in Figure 11. Microneedle tip formulations contained polymer blends of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP, Mw 58 kDa) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA, Mw 30 kDa) at total solid concentrations of 10%, 20% or 30% and at a weight ratio of 2:1. Initially, polymer solutions were prepared separately under continuous magnetic stirring - PVA were dissolved in purified water by heating at 80 °C and PVP in purified water at room temperature. The obtained polymer solutions were then mixed with the appropriate ratio and allowed to stand to eliminate entrapped air bubbles prior to casting. The technological procedure continued with pouring onto female 10 x 10 polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microneedle moulds (area of 1 cm2), consisting of 100 pyramidal tips - 700 μm in height, 300 μm width at the base and 200-μm interspacing (Figure 12). Centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 30 min at both directions then ensured complete filling of the mould cavities. The residual polymer solution remaining on the mould surface after filling was carefully removed using a spatula. The moulds were subsequently dried at room temperature in a desiccator for 24 hours until achieving of a complete solidification of the microneedle tips.
The backing layer formulations were prepared at a total polymer blend concentration of 30% (w/w), including Poloxamer 407 and PVP (Mw 58 kDa) at two weight ratios - 1:1 and 2:1. Poloxamer 407 was dissolved in cold water (4 °C) under gentle stirring and stored at refrigerator. The corresponding amount of PVP and naltrexone hydrochloride (0.1% w/w, relative to the total formulation) were subsequently added to the clear poloxamer solution under continuous stirring until a homogeneous solution was obtained. Following complete drying of the microneedle tips, 5 ml of the backing layer formulations were cast over the moulds containing the preformed needles. The systems were allowed to dry under controlled conditions (in desiccator at room T) for 24 hours until formation of a uniform backing layer. After complete drying, the obtained dissolving microneedle patches were carefully removed from the moulds and stored at room temperature.

3.4. Preparation of Simple Matrix Patches (SP Patches)

Simple matrix-type transdermal patches (SP) containing 0.1% (w/w) naltrexone hydrochloride (NTX) were prepared by solvent casting using three different 30% (w/w) total solid polymer blends, as expressed in Figure 13. Formulation SP-PVP:PVA contained a mixture of PVP (Mw 58 kDa) and PVA (Mw 30 kDa) in a weight ratio of 2:1. Formulations SP-PVP:P407/1:1 and SP-PVP:P407/2:1 represented a polymer blend of PVP (Mw 58 kDa) and Poloxamer 407 in a 1:1 and 2:1 weight ratio, respectively. The polymer blend solutions were prepared similarly as described in the previous section. All formulations were degassed and 5 ml of them were cast onto a 1 cm2 PDMS flat moulds to obtain uniform films, and dried under controlled conditions (in desiccator at room T) for 24 hours until complete solvent evaporation. The dried films were carefully removed from the moulds, and stored at room T.

3.5. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) of DMN Patches

The micromorphology of the prepared DMN patch formulations was studied via scanning electron microscope (JSM-5510, JEOL, Japan) operating at accelerating voltage of 10 kV. The samples were coated with gold for 30 s using a sputter-coater (JSC 1200, JEOL, Japan) in an inert argon atmosphere before imaging.

3.6. The Assay of API

The assay of NTX in each formulation (DMN and SP patche) was determined by immersing a 1 cm × 1 cm patch sample in 25 mL of purified water under magnetic stirring for 3 hours, followed by filtration through a 0.45 µm syringe filter. The drug content was analysed spectrophotometrically at λ = 280 nm (Thermo Scientific Evolution 300, Madison, WI, USA) and quantified against a standard calibration curve of NTX. The percentage of the API amount per one patch was calculated via Equation (1) [88]. The experiment was performed in triplicate and expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
A P I   a s s a y , % = A P I   a m o u n t   i n   t h e   s a m p l e × 100 t h e o r e t i c a l   A P I   a m o u n t (1)

3.7. In Vitro Gelation Temperature and Gelling Time

The thermoresponsive behavior of the poloxamer-containing systems was characterized for gelation temperature and in vitro gelling time. Four aqueous solutions, corresponding to backing layer formulations, were prepared containing 30% total polymer blend of PVP and Poloxamer 407 at ratios of 2:1 and 1:1, with and without 0.1% naltrexone hydrochloride. The gelation temperature was determined via utilization of a modified tube inversion approach [117]. Briefly, 10 g of each formulation was transferred into a glass vial and placed in a temperature-controlled paraffin bath. The samples were heated gradually at a rate of approximately 1 °C per minute under continuous stirring using a magnetic stirrer set at 175 rpm (IKA RCT standard, IKA-Werke GmbH & Co.KG, Staufen, Germany). The temperature was monitored using a calibrated digital thermometer (IKA ETS-D5, IKA-Werke GmbH & Co.KG, Staufen, Germany). The gelation temperature was determined as the temperature point at which the magnetic stir bar ceased movement, corresponding to transition from a liquid to a gel state. The in vitro gelling time was evaluated in a phosphate buffer solution media (pH 7.4). All samples were stored at room temperature for 6 h prior to testing. An aliquot (100 µL) of each formulation was carefully poured into 2 mL of pre-heated buffer maintained at 35 ± 0.5 °C. Gelling time, express as loss of fluidity, was determined visually [118]. All experiments were conducted in triplicate [117].

3.8. Mechanical Properties

3.8.1. Three-Point Bend Testing of Simple Matrix Patches

Three-point bending tests were performed to evaluate mechanical properties of the simple matrix patches, containing 30% polymer blends of PVP:Poloxamer 407 (1:1 and 2:1) and PVP:PVA (2:1), corresponding to DMN backing layer compositions. The study was conducted using a texture analyzer (TA-XT Plus, Stable Micro Systems, UK) equipped with a three-point bending rig. The test specimens were cut from the dried films and stored at room temperature for at least 24 h prior to testing. Each sample was placed on two parallel supports of the bending rig with a span distance of 4.8 mm, ensuring the proper positioned between the supports. The probe was aligned above the midpoint between the supports and moved vertically downward to apply a bending force to the film. The instrument was equipped with a 10 kg load cell. The trigger force was adjusted to 25 g providing consistent contact between the probe and the film surface. During the test, the applied mechanical force (g) and probe displacement (mm) were recorded in order to generate force–displacement curves. The obtained data were used to determine the mechanical characteristics of the films, including hardness, flexibility, and toughness [67,119,120]. All measurements were performed in triplicates for each formulation, and the results were expressed as mean ± SD.

3.8.2. Mechanical Strength of DMN Patches (Fracture Force Test)

Mechanical testing of the microneedle arrays was performed to evaluate their structural integrity and suitability for skin insertion. To characterize the resistance of the obtained DMN patches to compressive forces, a compression analysis was carried out using a texture analyzer (TA-XT Plus, Stable Micro Systems, UK) operating in compression mode, as demonstrated in Figure 14A. For the measurements, each DMN patch was fixed onto the cylindrical probe using double-sided adhesive tape, ensuring that the tips were positioned parallel to the direction of the applied force. A compressive force was then applied with a maximum load of 32 N - corresponding to the average force exerted by a human thumb [87,121], simulating realistic conditions of use. The microneedle tips were examined under a digital light microscope (Light microscope Leica DM750, Switzerland) before and after compression to evaluate structural integrity and further deformation. To quantify deformation following compression, the height of the tips was measured before (H1) and after (H2) the compression test and the percentage reduction in microneedle height was calculated according to the following Equation (2):
H e i g h t   r e d u c t i o n , % = H 1 H 2 × 100 H 1 (2)

3.8.3. Parafilm Penetration Test of DMN Patches

The insertion efficiency of the prepared DMN patches was evaluated using an eight-layer Parafilm® M as an elastic skin-mimicking model [51,87,92,121]. The DMN arrays were positioned on top of the Parafilm sheets, and insertion was performed using a Texture Analyzer (TA-XT Plus, Stable Micro Systems, UK) under the same conditions as the fracture force test (Figure 14B). Following insertion, the DMN were removed, and the Parafilm sheets were observed under a digital light microscope to assess penetration depth. The pores formed in each Parafilm layer were quantified and the penetration ability was expressed, using the Equation (3) [114,122].
P e n e t r a t i o n   o f   n   l a y e r = n u m b e r   o f   h o l e s   i n   n   l a y e r × 100 t o t a l   n u m b e r   o f   h o l e s (3)

3.9. In Vitro Drug Release Study

A modified paddle-over-disk–type dissolution method was employed using an incubator shaker (Julabo Shake Temp SW23, Germany) to determine the release of NTX from both DMN and SP patch formulations. The patches were affixed to a stainless-steel disk assembly and placed at the bottom of the vessels containing 50 ml phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4), maintained at 32 ± 0.5 °C and 50 rpm shaking rate. At predetermined intervals (5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, and 60 min), 1 mL samples were withdrawn and immediately replaced with an equivalent volume of fresh preheated PBS to maintain constant volume and sink conditions. The collected samples were analyzed spectrophotometrically at 280 nm against blank solution. All measurements were performed in triplicate, and the results are expressed as mean ± SD. [123,124].

3.10. In Vitro Permeability Study

The in vitro permeation of NTX from the developed DMN patches and matrix patches was evaluated in accordance with the recommendations of the European Medicines Agency for transdermal drug delivery systems [125]. The experiments were performed using an automated transdermal diffusion cell sampling system, Logan System 913-6 (Logan Instruments Corp., Somerset, NJ, USA). A synthetic membrane (Strat-M membrane) was used as a barrier separating the donor and receptor compartments [104,126,127]. The membrane was mounted between the two compartments of a Franz diffusion cell providing an effective diffusion area of 1.54 cm2. DMN patches (1 cm2) as well as matrix patches, containing an equivalent amount of approximately 5 mg NTX, were placed in the donor compartment and applied onto the membrane with gentle pressure to ensure proper contact. To guarantee the proper holding of the patches on the membrane, a 5 g weight was put on the top. Phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.4) with a volume of 12 mL was used as the receptor medium. The diffusion cells were maintained at 32 ± 0.5 °C under continuous stirring at 100 rpm thought the whole 24 h experiment. At predetermined time intervals, 1 mL samples were automatically withdrawn from the receptor compartment and immediately replaced with an equal volume of fresh buffer to maintain sink conditions. The amount of permeated drug was quantified spectrophotometrically at a wavelength of 280 nm. All experiments were performed in triplicate and the results are expressed as mean ± SD.
The cumulative amount of drug permeated through the membrane per unit surface area (Qt, µg/cm2) was calculated using the following Equation (4) [46,88,122,128,129]:
Q t = C n . V A + i n 1 C i . V s A (4)
where Qt represents the cumulative NTX amount penetrated through the membrane; Cn—NTX concentration in the nth sample; Ci—NTX concentration in the ith sample; VA—acceptor medium volume (12 mL); Vs—sample volume (1 mL); and A—effective permeation surface area of the membrane (1.54 cm2).
The percentage of the API permeated relative to the initially applied dose was determined using the following Equation (5) [130]:
A P I   p e r m e a t e d , % = Q t × 100 M (5)
where Qt represents the cumulative amount of naltrexone hydrochloride permeated through the membrane at time t (µg/cm2), and M is the total amount of the API initially loaded in the tested patch (µg/cm2).

3.11. Stability Study

Stability studies of the chosen DMN formulation were conducted under controlled environmental conditions at 25 °C and two different relative humidity levels. Relative humidity of 43% was maintained using a saturated potassium carbonate solution, while a saturated potassium chloride solution was used to generate a relative humidity of 86% [85,88,131]. The representative DMN patch samples were stored under these conditions in airtight containers for a period of one month. Following storage, the mechanical characteristics of the DMN patches and the API assay were evaluated and compared with the initial values in order to assess potential changes during storage.

4. Conclusions

The present study demonstrated the successful design and development of dissolving microneedle patches with an advanced architecture for transdermal delivery of naltrexone hydrochloride. The combination of a PVP/PVA-based microneedle tips and a PVP/Poloxamer 407 backing layer proved to be an effective strategy for balancing mechanical performance and drug delivery characteristics. The selected polymer blend for the tips ensured adequate mechanical strength for insertion while maintaining suitable dissolution behavior, whereas the thermoresponsive backing layer functioned as a drug reservoir capable of modulating release and permeation.
The results clearly indicated that polymer concentration plays a critical role in microneedle formation and performance. Both low and high polymer concentrations resulted in suboptimal microneedle morphology and reduced tip height due to insufficient mechanical integrity or hindered mold filling, respectively. In contrast, the intermediate polymer concentration (20%) provided optimal viscosity, enabling efficient cavity filling, reduced shrinkage, and formation of well-defined microneedles with superior mechanical properties and insertion ability. Mechanical testing and insertion studies confirmed that the optimized formulation (MN-20%/2:1) exhibited the most favorable balance between strength, flexibility, and penetration efficiency. Furthermore, in vitro release and permeation studies demonstrated that microneedle-assisted delivery significantly enhanced naltrexone transport compared to conventional matrix patches, confirming the ability of the system to overcome the barrier function of the skin. The study also demonstrated the importance of the composition of the backing layer for the overall patch performance. The incorporation of NTX only in the backing layer enabled high, reproducible and uniform drug loading, without compromising tips mechanical integrity, whereas the proper PVP:Poloxamer 407 ratio contributed to a more controlled drug release profile due to its thermoresponsive gel-forming behavior.
Overall, the developed microneedle system could be considered as promising platform for transdermal delivery of NTX, offering improved permeation, controlled release, and patient-friendly administration. The findings highlight the importance of formulation optimization, particularly polymer composition and concentration, in achieving an effective and reliable microneedle-based drug delivery system.

5. Limitations

This study has several limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. First, no ex vivo or in vivo studies were conducted due to ethical and institutional constraints. Therefore, the performance of the microneedle systems was evaluated only using in vitro models, including the Strat-M membrane. Although this model is widely used, it does not fully replicate the complexity of biological skin, and the correlation between in vitro findings and in vivo performance remains to be established. Further ex vivo and in vivo studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness, safety and therapeutic relevance of the system, especially for supporting the hypothesis that in situ gelation of poloxamer could contribute to preventing of micropores closure in the skin following microneedle dissolution.
Another limitation concerns the scalability of the fabrication process. The microneedles were produced using a laboratory-scale micromoulding method, which may present challenges in large-scale manufacturing. Factors such as reproducibility, uniform filling of moulds, drying conditions, and batch-to-batch consistency may vary under industrial conditions.
In addition, only a limited range of polymer concentrations and formulation parameters was investigated, and further optimization may be possible. These aspects should be addressed in future work to support the translation of the developed microneedle system.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.P., C.V.; Methodology, T.P.; Software, C.V.; Validation, I.G.; Formal analysis, I.G.; Investigation, T.P., I.G., C.V.; Resources, T.P. and C.V.; Data curation, C.V.; Writing—original draft preparation, T.P.; Writing—review and editing, T.P., I.G., C.V.; Visualization, T.P., C.V.; Supervision, T.P., C.V.; Project administration, C.V.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by European Union - NextGenerationEU, through the National Recovery and Resilience Plan of the Republic of Bulgaria, Project № BG-RRP-2.004-0004-C01.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the authors (see given emails).

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the use of artificial intelligence tools for the purpose of language editing, grammar correction, and improving readability. These tools did not contribute to the scientific content, study design, data analysis, or interpretation of results. The authors take full responsibility for the content of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
API Active pharmaceutical ingredient
DMN Dissolving microneedles
DMN patch Dissolving microneedle patch
FT-IR Fourier Transform Infrared
MN Microneedles
NTX Naltrexone hydrochloride
P407 Poloxamer 407
PNIPAM Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)
PVA Polyvinyl alcohol
PVP Polyvinylpyrrolidone
SD Standard deviation
SEM Scanning electron microscopy

References

  1. Singh, D.; Saadabadi, A. Naltrexone. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island (FL), 2025. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kim, P.S.; Fishman, M.A. Low-Dose Naltrexone for Chronic Pain: Update and Systemic Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2020, 24, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Leiber, K.K.; Parker, R.W. Therapeutic Uses and Efficacy of Low-Dose Naltrexone: A Scoping Review. Cureus 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Stancil, S.L.; Abdel-Rahman, S.; Wagner, J. Developmental Considerations for the Use of Naltrexone in Children and Adolescents. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 2021, 26, 675–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gonzalez, J.P.; Brogden, R.N. Naltrexone. Drugs 1988, 35, 192–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lee, M.W.; Fujioka, K. Naltrexone for the Treatment of Obesity: Review and Update. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 2009, 10, 1841–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. New Drugs 2. In Therapeutics Letter; Perry, T., Ed.; Therapeutics Initiative: Vancouver (BC), 1994. [Google Scholar]
  8. Shenkoya, B.; Gopalakrishnan, M.; Eke, A.C. Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Long-Acting Extended-Release Naltrexone in Pregnant Women with Opioid Use Disorder. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology 2024, 13, 1939–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sudakin, D. Naltrexone: Not Just for Opioids Anymore. J Med Toxicol 2016, 12, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Santos, R.A.; Rae, M.; Dartora, V.F.M.C.; Matos, J.K.R.; Camarini, R.; Lopes, L.B. Bioresponsive Nanostructured Systems for Sustained Naltrexone Release and Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder: Development and Biological Evaluation. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2020, 585, 119474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shulman, M.; Greiner, M.G.; Tafessu, H.M.; Opara, O.; Ohrtman, K.; Potter, K.; Hefner, K.; Jelstrom, E.; Rosenthal, R.N.; Wenzel, K.; et al. Rapid Initiation of Injection Naltrexone for Opioid Use Disorder: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024, 7, e249744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Syed, Y.Y.; Keating, G.M. Extended-Release Intramuscular Naltrexone (VIVITROL®): A Review of Its Use in the Prevention of Relapse to Opioid Dependence in Detoxified Patients. CNS Drugs 2013, 27, 851–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sofuoglu, M.; DeVito, E.E.; Carroll, K.M. Pharmacological and Behavioral Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder. Psychiatr Res Clin Pract 2018, 1, 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nalluri, B.N.; Milligan, C.; Chen, J.; Crooks, P.A.; Stinchcomb, A.L. In Vitro Release Studies on Matrix Type Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems of Naltrexone and Its Acetyl Prodrug. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2005, 31, 871–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Milewski, M.; Pinninti, R.R.; Stinchcomb, A.L. Naltrexone Salt Selection for Enhanced Transdermal Permeation through Microneedle-Treated Skin. J Pharm Sci 2012, 101, 2777–2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Paudel, K.S.; Nalluri, B.N.; Hammell, D.C.; Valiveti, S.; Kiptoo, P.; Hamad, M.O.; Crooks, P.A.; Stinchcomb, A.L. Transdermal Delivery of Naltrexone and Its Active Metabolite 6-Beta-Naltrexol in Human Skin in Vitro and Guinea Pigs in Vivo. J Pharm Sci 2005, 94, 1965–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Siamidi, A.; Dedeloudi, A.; Vlachou, M. Probing the Release of Bupropion and Naltrexone Hydrochloride Salts from Biopolymeric Matrices of Diverse Chemical Structures. Polymers (Basel) 2021, 13, 1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vaseem, R.S.; D’cruz, A.; Shetty, S.; -, H.; Vardhan, A.; R, S.S.; Marques, S.M.; Kumar, L.; Verma, R. Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems: A Focused Review of the Physical Methods of Permeation Enhancement. Adv Pharm Bull 2024, 14, 67–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Guillot, A.J.; Cordeiro, A.S.; Donnelly, R.F.; Montesinos, M.C.; Garrigues, T.M.; Melero, A. Microneedle-Based Delivery: An Overview of Current Applications and Trends. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jia, B.; Xia, T.; Wang, X.; Xu, Y.; Guo, Z. Morphology Design of Polymer Microneedle Arrays: Key Factors from the Application Perspective. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 2023, 88, 104883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ferreira, L.M.; Sari, M.H.M.; Azambuja, J.H.; da Silveira, E.F.; Cervi, V.F.; Marchiori, M.C.L.; Maria-Engler, S.S.; Wink, M.R.; Azevedo, J.G.; Nogueira, C.W.; et al. Xanthan Gum-Based Hydrogel Containing Nanocapsules for Cutaneous Diphenyl Diselenide Delivery in Melanoma Therapy. Invest New Drugs 2020, 38, 662–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Stinchcomb, A.; Banks, S.; Pinninti, R. Transdermal Delivery of Naltrexone Hydrochloride, Naltrexol Hydrochloride, and Bis(Hydroxy-Methyl)Propionyl-3-0 Ester Naltrexone Using Microneedles 2008.
  23. Tobin, K.V.; Fiegel, J.; Brogden, N.K. Thermosensitive Gels Used to Improve Microneedle-Assisted Transdermal Delivery of Naltrexone. Polymers 2021, 13, 933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. V. Tobin, K.; K. Brogden, N. Thermosensitive Biomaterial Gels with Chemical Permeation Enhancers for Enhanced Microneedle Delivery of Naltrexone for Managing Opioid and Alcohol Dependency. Biomaterials Science 2023, 11, 5846–5858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Milewski, M.; Paudel, K.S.; Brogden, N.K.; Ghosh, P.; Banks, S.L.; Hammell, D.C.; Stinchcomb, A.L. Microneedle-Assisted Percutaneous Delivery of Naltrexone Hydrochloride in Yucatan Minipig: In Vitro-in Vivo Correlation. Mol Pharm 2013, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wermeling, D.P.; Banks, S.L.; Hudson, D.A.; Gill, H.S.; Gupta, J.; Prausnitz, M.R.; Stinchcomb, A.L. Microneedles Permit Transdermal Delivery of a Skin-Impermeant Medication to Humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105, 2058–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ghosh, P.; Brogden, N.; Stinchcomb, A. Effect of Formulation PH on Transport of Naltrexone Species and Pore Closure in Microneedle-Enhanced Transdermal Drug Delivery. Molecular pharmaceutics 2013, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Priya, S.; Tomar, Y.; Desai, V.M.; Singhvi, G. Enhanced Skin Drug Delivery Using Dissolving Microneedles: A Potential Approach for the Management of Skin Disorders. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2023, 20, 721–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Moawad, F.; Pouliot, R.; Brambilla, D. Dissolving Microneedles in Transdermal Drug Delivery: A Critical Analysis of Limitations and Translation Challenges. Journal of Controlled Release 2025, 383, 113794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhuo, Y.; Wang, F.; Lv, Q.; Fang, C. Dissolving Microneedles: Drug Delivery and Disease Treatment. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 2025, 250, 114571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lee, J.W.; Park, J.-H.; Prausnitz, M.R. Dissolving Microneedles for Transdermal Drug Delivery. Biomaterials 2008, 29, 2113–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, Z.; Liu, L.; Liu, E.; Chen, R.; Huang, Y.; Li, Q. Carrier Polymer-Free Dissolvable Microneedles Enable Superhigh Drug Payload for Percutaneous Protein Delivery. ACS Materials Lett. 2024, 6, 4980–4987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, J.Y.; Feng, Y.H.; He, Y.T.; Hu, L.F.; Liang, L.; Zhao, Z.Q.; Chen, B.Z.; Guo, X.D. Thermosensitive Hydrogel Microneedles for Controlled Transdermal Drug Delivery. Acta Biomaterialia 2022, 153, 308–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Roussel, S.; Udabe, J.; Bin Sabri, A.; Calderón, M.; Donnelly, R. Leveraging Novel Innovative Thermoresponsive Polymers in Microneedles for Targeted Intradermal Deposition. Int J Pharm 2024, 652, 123847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Khan, S.; Minhas, M.U.; Tekko, I.A.; Donnelly, R.F.; Thakur, R.R.S. Evaluation of Microneedles-Assisted in Situ Depot Forming Poloxamer Gels for Sustained Transdermal Drug Delivery. Drug Deliv. and Transl. Res. 2019, 9, 764–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Khan, S.; Minhas, M.U. Micro Array Patch Assisted Transdermal Delivery of High Dose, Ibuprofen Sodium Using Thermoresponsive Sodium Alginate/Poly (Vinylcaprolactam) in Situ Gels Depot. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2023, 252, 126464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khan, S.; Minhas, M.U.; Singh Thakur, R.R.; Aqeel, M.T. Microneedles Assisted Controlled and Improved Transdermal Delivery of High Molecular Drugs via in Situ Forming Depot Thermoresponsive Poloxamers Gels in Skin Microchannels. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy 2022, 48, 265–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Menze, A.R.; Sinnott, J.P.; Nazarenko, A.Y. Crystal Structure of Naltrexone Chloride Solvates with Ethanol, Propan-2-Ol, and 2-Methyl propan-2-Ol. Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun 2017, 73, 1013–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tavakol, H.; Esfandyari, M.; Taheri, S.; Heydari, A. Investigation of Structure, Vibrational and NMR Spectra of Oxycodone and Naltrexone: A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 2011, 79, 574–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. D’Amelia, R.P.; Huang, L.; Mancuso, J. Quantitative Analysis of Polyvinyl Alcohol-Polyethylene (PVOH-PE) Copolymers and Polyvinyl Pyrrolidone-Polyvinyl Acetate (PVP-PVAc) Copolymers and Blends Using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy and Elemental Analysis. World Journal of Chemical Education 2019, 7, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mansur, H.S.; Sadahira, C.M.; Souza, A.N.; Mansur, A.A.P. FTIR Spectroscopy Characterization of Poly (Vinyl Alcohol) Hydrogel with Different Hydrolysis Degree and Chemically Crosslinked with Glutaraldehyde. Materials Science and Engineering: C 2008, 28, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Karolewicz, B.; Gajda, M.; Pluta, J.; Górniak, A. Dissolution Study and Thermal Analysis of Fenofibrate–Pluronic F127 Solid Dispersions. J Therm Anal Calorim 2016, 125, 751–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Giuliano, E.; Paolino, D.; Fresta, M.; Cosco, D. Mucosal Applications of Poloxamer 407-Based Hydrogels: An Overview. Pharmaceutics 2018, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sullivan, S.P.; Koutsonanos, D.G.; del Pilar Martin, M.; Lee, J.W.; Zarnitsyn, V.; Choi, S.-O.; Murthy, N.; Compans, R.W.; Skountzou, I.; Prausnitz, M.R. Dissolving Polymer Microneedle Patches for Influenza Vaccination. Nat Med 2010, 16, 915–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tong, R.; Kohane, D.S. Shedding Light on Nanomedicine. WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology 2012, 4, 638–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jin, S.Y.; Park, E.J.-J.; Kwon, S.M.; Jung, H.-S.; Kim, D.W. Rapidly Dissolving Microneedles Incorporating Lidocaine Hydrochloride: A PVP/PVA-Based Approach for Local Anesthesia. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Justyna, K.; Patrycja, Ś; Krzysztof, M.; Rafał, W. Dissolving Microneedles Fabricated from 3D-Printed Master Molds for Application in Veterinary Medicine. Sci Rep 2025, 15, 14102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ramadon, D.; Ulayya, F.; Qur’ani, A.S.; Iskandarsyah, I.; Harahap, Y.; Anjani, Q.K.; Aileen, V.; Hartrianti, P.; Donnelly, R.F. Combination of Dissolving Microneedles with Nanosuspension and Co-Grinding for Transdermal Delivery of Ketoprofen. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, Y.; Lee, J.-H.; Meng, M.; Cui, N.; Dai, C.-Y.; Jia, Q.; Lee, E.-S.; Jiang, H.-B. An Overview on Thermosensitive Oral Gel Based on Poloxamer 407. Materials 2021, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hennig, M. Microneedles Assisted Controlled and Improved Transdermal Delivery of High Molecular Drugs via in Situ Forming Depot Thermorespo. Pharma Excipients 2022. [Google Scholar]
  51. Alrimawi, B.H.; Lee, J.Y.; Ng, K.W.; Goh, C.F. In Vitro Evaluation of Microneedle Strength: A Comparison of Test Configurations and Experimental Insights. RSC Pharm. 2024, 1, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. La Malfa, F.; van Hulst, I.A.; Ossendorp, F.; Staufer, U.; van der Maaden, K. A Comprehensive Design-to-Skin Pipeline to Fabricate Polymeric Microneedles Using Ultrahigh-Resolution 3D Printing. Pharm Res 2025, 42, 2125–2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chellathurai, M.S.; Ling, V.W.; Palanirajan, V.; Chellathurai, M.S.; Ling, V.W.; Palanirajan, V. Fabrication and Evaluation of Transdermal Microneedles for a Recombinant Human Keratinocyte Growth Factor. Turkish Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yang, S.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, L.; Chen, N.; Yuan, W.; Jin, T. A Scalable Fabrication Process of Polymer Microneedles. Int J Nanomedicine 2012, 7, 1415–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hennessy, M.G.; Craster, R.V.; Matar, O.K. Drying-Induced Stresses in Poroelastic Drops on Rigid Substrates. Phys. Rev. E 2022, 105, 054602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Dave, R.; Shinde, S.; Kalayil, N.; Budar, A. Engineering Microscopic Delivery Systems: A Review of Dissolving Microneedle Design, Fabrication, and Function. Micro and Nano Syst Lett 2024, 12, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, Z.; Du, G.; Sun, X.; Zhang, Z. Viscoelastic Properties of Polymeric Microneedles Determined by Micromanipulation Measurements and Mathematical Modelling. Materials 2023, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Eltayib, E.M. Fabrication of Porous Polymeric Microneedles: A Concise Overview. RSC Adv 15 18697–18714. [CrossRef]
  59. Smith, E.; Lau, W.M.; Abdelghany, T.M.; Vukajlovic, D.; Novakovic, K.; Ng, K.W. Vac-and-Fill: A Micromoulding Technique for Fabricating Microneedle Arrays with Vacuum-Activated, Hands-Free Mould-Filling. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2024, 650, 123706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yu, W.; Gu, J.; Li, Z.; Ruan, S.; Chen, B.; Shen, C.; Lee, L.J.; Wang, X. Study on the Influence of Microinjection Molding Processing Parameters on Replication Quality of Polylactic Acid Microneedle Array Product. Polymers 2023, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rad, Z.F.; Prewett, P.D.; Davies, G.J. An Overview of Microneedle Applications, Materials, and Fabrication Methods. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2021, 12, 1034–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Xiu, X.; Gao, G.; Liu, Y.; Ma, F. Drug Delivery with Dissolving Microneedles: Skin Puncture, Its Influencing Factors and Improvement Strategies. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 2022, 76, 103653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hennig, M. Alteration of Gel Point of Poloxamer 338 Induced by Pharmaceutical Actives and Excipients. Pharma Excipients 2025. [Google Scholar]
  64. Morita, T.; Torii, Y.; Imamura, H.; Kadota, T.; Sakuma, F.; Higashi, K.; Sumi, T. Pair Potential between Poloxamer 407 Micelles in 14 Wt % Aqueous Solution Clarifying the Sol–Gel–Sol Transition by Temperature Rise. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2024, 15, 7909–7915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Balu, P.; Srikanth, S.; Gnandhas, D.P.; Durai, R.D.; Ulaganathan, V.; B Narayanan, V.H. Development and Optimization of an Injectable In-Situ Gel System for Sustained Release of Anti-Tuberculosis Drugs. Sci Rep 2025, 15, 21383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sakuma, F.; Higashi, K.; Ueda, K.; Morita, T.; Iohara, D.; Hirayama, F.; Moribe, K. Effect of Acetaminophen on Poloxamer 407 Micelles and Hydrogels: The Relationship between Structural and Physical Properties. Langmuir 2024, 40, 15610–15620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Smith, F.; Fiedler, B.; Elkassas, K.; Mohamed, R.; Cheung, K.; Zelzer, M.; Crean, A.; Chowdhury, F.; Segal, J.; Rawson, F.; et al. Optimisation of Backing Layer Formulations via Rational Polymer Selection to Improve the Insertion of Dissolving Microneedles Into Skin. Mol. Pharmaceutics 2026, 23, 757–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dołowacka-Jóźwiak, A.; Nawrot-Hadzik, I.; Matkowski, A.; Nowakowski, P.; Dudek-Wicher, R.; Markowska, D.; Adamski, R.; Krzyżanowska-Gołąb, D.; Karolewicz, B. Optimization of Cellulose Derivative-, PVA-, and PVP-Based Films with Reynoutria Japonica Extract to Improve Periodontal Disease Treatment. Materials 2024, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jamasri, J.; Yudhanto, F.; Yudha, V.; Syafri, E. Mechanical, Physical and Thermal Characterization of PVA (Polyvinyl Alcohol)/Chitosan Bioplastic Film. International Journal of Heat and Technology 2023, 41, 687–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mondal, D.; Mollick, Md.M.R.; Bhowmick, B.; Maity, D.; Bain, M.K.; Rana, D.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Dana, K.; Chattopadhyay, D. Effect of Poly(Vinyl Pyrrolidone) on the Morphology and Physical Properties of Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)/Sodium Montmorillonite Nanocomposite Films. Progress in Natural Science: Materials International 2013, 23, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sallal, A.A.; Salman, S.A.; Habeeb, A.A. STUDYING OF SOME DIELECTRIC AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF (PVA:PVP) POLYMER BLEND. International Journal of Current Research 2018, 10. [Google Scholar]
  72. Rao, X.; Zhou, Q.; Wen, Q.; Ou, Z.; Fu, L.; Gong, Y.; Du, X.; Huo, C. High-Performance and Water Resistant PVA-Based Films Modified by Air Plasma Treatment. Membranes 2022, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yang, T.; Wu, J.; Yao, Y.; Wang, K.; Zhang, Q.; Fu, Q. Towards the Toughness-Strength Balance of Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Films via Synergic Plasticization. Polymer 2024, 301, 127031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lu, Z.; Geng, B.; Ma, Q.; Ning, D.; Zhao, R.; Kong, F.; E, S. Polymer Induced Strengthening and Toughening of Aramid Nanofiber Film: The Importance of Densification and Hydrogen Bonding. Applied Surface Science 2023, 607, 155045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Deng, C.; Dong, H.; Kou, Y.; Liu, H.; Sun, K.; Jian, W.; Shi, Q. Flexible Self-Healing Phase Change Film with High Transition Enthalpy for Thermal Management. Journal of Energy Storage 2023, 62, 106873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jantrawut, P.; Chaiwarit, T.; Jantanasakulwong, K.; Brachais, C.H.; Chambin, O. Effect of Plasticizer Type on Tensile Property and In Vitro Indomethacin Release of Thin Films Based on Low-Methoxyl Pectin. Polymers 2017, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tarique, J.; Sapuan, S.M.; Khalina, A. Effect of Glycerol Plasticizer Loading on the Physical, Mechanical, Thermal, and Barrier Properties of Arrowroot (Maranta Arundinacea) Starch Biopolymers. Sci Rep 2021, 11, 13900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Van Zee, N.J.; Peroutka, A.S.; Hillmyer, M.A.; Lodge, T.P. Effect of Poloxamer Binding on the Elasticity and Toughness of Model Lipid Bilayers. Langmuir 2023, 39, 7258–7267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Abdeltawab, H.; Svirskis, D.; Hill, A.G.; Sharma, M. Increasing the Hydrophobic Component of Poloxamers and the Inclusion of Salt Extend the Release of Bupivacaine from Injectable In Situ Gels, While Common Polymer Additives Have Little Effect. Gels 2022, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tahir, M.; Vicini, S.; Jędrzejewski, T.; Wrotek, S.; Sionkowska, A. New Composite Materials Based on PVA, PVP, CS, and PDA. Polymers 2024, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jeong, W.Y.; Kwon, M.; Choi, H.E.; Kim, K.S. Recent Advances in Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems: A Review. Biomaterials Research 2021, 25, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Teodorescu, M.; Bercea, M.; Morariu, S. Biomaterials of PVA and PVP in Medical and Pharmaceutical Applications: Perspectives and Challenges. Biotechnology Advances 2019, 37, 109–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ando, D.; Miyatsuji, M.; Sakoda, H.; Yamamoto, E.; Miyazaki, T.; Koide, T.; Sato, Y.; Izutsu, K. Mechanical Characterization of Dissolving Microneedles: Factors Affecting Physical Strength of Needles. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Chanabodeechalermrung, B.; Chaiwarit, T.; Chaichit, S.; Udomsom, S.; Baipaywad, P.; Worajittiphon, P.; Jantrawut, P. HPMC/PVP K90 Dissolving Microneedles Fabricated from 3D-Printed Master Molds: Impact on Microneedle Morphology, Mechanical Strength, and Topical Dissolving Property. Polymers 2024, 16, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Donnelly, R.F.; Singh, T.R.R.; Morrow, D.I.J.; Woolfson, A.D. Microneedle-Mediated Transdermal and Intradermal Drug Delivery; John Wiley & Sons, 2012; ISBN 978-1-119-95966-3. [Google Scholar]
  86. Du, G.; Zhang, Z.; He, P.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, X. Determination of the Mechanical Properties of Polymeric Microneedles by Micromanipulation. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 2021, 117, 104384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Larrañeta, E.; Moore, J.; Vicente-Pérez, E.M.; González-Vázquez, P.; Lutton, R.; Woolfson, A.D.; Donnelly, R.F. A Proposed Model Membrane and Test Method for Microneedle Insertion Studies. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2014, 472, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Putri, H.E.; Utami, R.N.; Aliyah; Wahyudin, E.; Oktaviani, W.W.; Mudjahid, M.; Permana, A.D. Dissolving Microneedle Formulation of Ceftriaxone: Effect of Polymer Concentrations on Characterisation and Ex Vivo Permeation Study. J Pharm Innov 2022, 17, 1176–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Fatema, K. Microneedle Arrays for Pain-Free Transdermal Drug Delivery: Formulation and Characterisation.
  90. Lee, J.W.; Park, J.-H.; Prausnitz, M.R. Dissolving Microneedles for Transdermal Drug Delivery. Biomaterials 2008, 29, 2113–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Waghule, T.; Singhvi, G.; Dubey, S.K.; Pandey, M.M.; Gupta, G.; Singh, M.; Dua, K. Microneedles: A Smart Approach and Increasing Potential for Transdermal Drug Delivery System. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 2019, 109, 1249–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Permana, A.D.; Paredes, A.J.; Volpe-Zanutto, F.; Anjani, Q.K.; Utomo, E.; Donnelly, R.F. Dissolving Microneedle-Mediated Dermal Delivery of Itraconazole Nanocrystals for Improved Treatment of Cutaneous Candidiasis. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 2020, 154, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Permana, A.D.; McCrudden, M.T.C.; Donnelly, R.F. Enhanced Intradermal Delivery of Nanosuspensions of Antifilariasis Drugs Using Dissolving Microneedles: A Proof of Concept Study. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Volpe-Zanutto, F.; Ferreira, L.T.; Permana, A.D.; Kirkby, M.; Paredes, A.J.; Vora, L.K.; P. Bonfanti, A.; Charlie-Silva, I.; Raposo, C.; Figueiredo, M.C.; et al. Artemether and Lumefantrine Dissolving Microneedle Patches with Improved Pharmacokinetic Performance and Antimalarial Efficacy in Mice Infected with Plasmodium Yoelii. Journal of Controlled Release 2021, 333, 298–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Hirun, N.; Kraisit, P.; Santhan, S. Mixed Micellar Gel of Poloxamer Mixture for Improved Solubilization of Poorly Water-Soluble Ibuprofen and Use as Thermosensitive In Situ Gel. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Almeida, H.; Amaral, M.H.; Lobão, P.; Lobo, J.M.S. Pluronic® F-127 and Pluronic Lecithin Organogel (PLO): Main Features and Their Applications in Topical and Transdermal Administration of Drugs. Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences 2012, 15, 592–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Bercea, M.; Constantin, M.; Plugariu, I.-A.; Oana Daraba, M.; Luminita Ichim, D. Thermosensitive Gels of Pullulan and Poloxamer 407 as Potential Injectable Biomaterials. Journal of Molecular Liquids 2022, 362, 119717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Dumortier, G.; Grossiord, J.L.; Agnely, F.; Chaumeil, J.C. A Review of Poloxamer 407 Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Characteristics. Pharm Res 2006, 23, 2709–2728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Fakhari, A.; Corcoran, M.; Schwarz, A. Thermogelling Properties of Purified Poloxamer 407. Heliyon 2017, 3, e00390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ur-Rehman, T.; Tavelin, S.; Gröbner, G. Effect of DMSO on Micellization, Gelation and Drug Release Profile of Poloxamer 407. Int J Pharm 2010, 394, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Bouwer, F.; Brits, M.; Viljoen, J.M. Cracking the Skin Barrier: Models and Methods Driving Dermal Drug Delivery. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kichou, H.; Bonnier, F.; Dancik, Y.; Bakar, J.; Michael-Jubeli, R.; Caritá, A.C.; Perse, X.; Soucé, M.; Rapetti, L.; Tfayli, A.; et al. Strat-M® Positioning for Skin Permeation Studies: A Comparative Study Including EpiSkin® RHE, and Human Skin. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2023, 647, 123488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Neupane, R.; Boddu, S.H.S.; Renukuntla, J.; Babu, R.J.; Tiwari, A.K. Alternatives to Biological Skin in Permeation Studies: Current Trends and Possibilities. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Sohn, J.S.; Choi, J.-S. Development of a Tadalafil Transdermal Formulation and Evaluation of Its Ability to in Vitro Transdermal Permeate Using Strat-M® Membrane. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2024, 192, 106615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Nguyen, H.X.; Nguyen, C.N. Microneedle-Mediated Transdermal Delivery of Biopharmaceuticals. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Yu Li, Q.; Nan Zhang, J.; Zhi Chen, B.; Lei Wang, Q.; Dong Guo, X. A Solid Polymer Microneedle Patch Pretreatment Enhances the Permeation of Drug Molecules into the Skin. RSC Advances 2017, 7, 15408–15415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Stahl, J.; Wohlert, M.; Kietzmann, M. Microneedle Pretreatment Enhances the Percutaneous Permeation of Hydrophilic Compounds with High Melting Points. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 2012, 13, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Li, H.; Peng, Z.; Song, Y.; Dou, M.; Lu, X.; Li, M.; Zhai, X.; Gu, Y.; Mamujiang, R.; Du, S.; et al. Study of the Permeation-Promoting Effect and Mechanism of Solid Microneedles on Different Properties of Drugs. Drug Deliv 30 2165737. [CrossRef]
  109. Nguyen, H.X.; Kipping, T.; Banga, A.K. Polymeric Microneedles Enhance Transdermal Delivery of Therapeutics. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Patel, K.K.; Brogden, N.K. Impact of Formulation and Microneedle Length on Transdermal Metronidazole Permeation through Microneedle-Treated Skin. Pharm Res 2024, 41, 355–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Milewski, M.; Brogden, N.K.; Stinchcomb, A.L. Current Aspects of Formulation Efforts and Pore Lifetime Related to Microneedle Treatment of Skin. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2010, 7, 617–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Larrañeta, E.; Lutton, R.E.M.; Brady, A.J.; Vicente-Pérez, E.M.; Woolfson, A.D.; Thakur, R.R.S.; Donnelly, R.F. Microwave-Assisted Preparation of Hydrogel-Forming Microneedle Arrays for Transdermal Drug Delivery Applications. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 2015, 300, 586–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. McCrudden, M.T.C.; McAlister, E.; Courtenay, A.J.; González-Vázquez, P.; Raj Singh, T.R.; Donnelly, R.F. Microneedle Applications in Improving Skin Appearance. Experimental Dermatology 2015, 24, 561–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Zhang, C.; Vora, L.K.; Tekko, I.A.; Volpe-Zanutto, F.; Peng, K.; Paredes, A.J.; McCarthy, H.O.; Donnelly, R.F. Development of Dissolving Microneedles for Intradermal Delivery of the Long-Acting Antiretroviral Drug Bictegravir. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2023, 642, 123108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Donnelly, R.F.; Singh, T.R.R.; Garland, M.J.; Migalska, K.; Majithiya, R.; McCrudden, C.M.; Kole, P.L.; Mahmood, T.M.T.; McCarthy, H.O.; Woolfson, A.D. Hydrogel-Forming Microneedle Arrays for Enhanced Transdermal Drug Delivery. Advanced Functional Materials 2012, 22, 4879–4890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Singh, P.; Carrier, A.; Chen, Y.; Lin, S.; Wang, J.; Cui, S.; Zhang, X. Polymeric Microneedles for Controlled Transdermal Drug Delivery. Journal of Controlled Release 2019, 315, 97–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Wei, G.; Xu, H.; Ding, P.T.; Li, S.M.; Zheng, J.M. Thermosetting Gels with Modulated Gelation Temperature for Ophthalmic Use: The Rheological and Gamma Scintigraphic Studies. Journal of Controlled Release 2002, 83, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Bhalerao, H.; Koteshwara, K.B.; Chandran, S. Brinzolamide Dimethyl Sulfoxide In Situ Gelling Ophthalmic Solution: Formulation Optimisation and In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation. AAPS PharmSciTech 2020, 21, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Aidoo, E.K.; Sumaila, A.; Jahan, M.; Li, G.; Mensah, P. Thermomechanical Properties of Sustainable Polymer Composites Incorporating Agricultural Wastes. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing 2025, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Kida, D.; Konopka, T.; Jurczyszyn, K.; Karolewicz, B. Technological Aspects and Evaluation Methods for Polymer Matrices as Dental Drug Carriers. Biomedicines 2023, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Lobita, M.C.; El-Sayed, N.; Pinto, J.F.; Santos, H.A. Development of Fast Dissolving Polymer-Based Microneedles for Delivery of an Antigenic Melanoma Cell Membrane. Int J Pharm 2023, 642, 123143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. González-Vázquez, P.; Larrañeta, E.; McCrudden, M.T.C.; Jarrahian, C.; Rein-Weston, A.; Quintanar-Solares, M.; Zehrung, D.; McCarthy, H.; Courtenay, A.J.; Donnelly, R.F. Transdermal Delivery of Gentamicin Using Dissolving Microneedle Arrays for Potential Treatment of Neonatal Sepsis. Journal of Controlled Release 2017, 265, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Singh, A.; Bali, A. Formulation and Characterization of Transdermal Patches for Controlled Delivery of Duloxetine Hydrochloride. J Anal Sci Technol 2016, 7, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Larrañeta, E.; Stewart, S.; Fallows, S.J.; Birkhäuer, L.L.; McCrudden, M.T.C.; Woolfson, A.D.; Donnelly, R.F. A Facile System to Evaluate in Vitro Drug Release from Dissolving Microneedle Arrays. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2016, 497, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Quality of Transdermal Patches - Scientific Guideline | European Medicines Agency (EMA). Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/quality-transdermal-patches-scientific-guideline (accessed on 11 March 2026).
  126. Arce, F.J.; Asano, N.; See, G.L.; Itakura, S.; Todo, H.; Sugibayashi, K. Usefulness of Artificial Membrane, Strat-M®, in the Assessment of Drug Permeation from Complex Vehicles in Finite Dose Conditions. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Kaur, L.; Singh, K.; Paul, S.; Singh, S.; Singh, S.; Jain, S.K. A Mechanistic Study to Determine the Structural Similarities Between Artificial Membrane Strat-MTM and Biological Membranes and Its Application to Carry Out Skin Permeation Study of Amphotericin B Nanoformulations. AAPS PharmSciTech 2018, 19, 1606–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Liu, X.; Shen, B.; Shen, C.; Zhong, R.; Wang, X.; Yuan, H. Nanoparticle-Loaded Gels for Topical Delivery of Nitrofurazone: Effect of Particle Size on Skin Permeation and Retention. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 2018, 45, 367–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Zheng, J.; Shen, C.-Y.; Pang, J.-Y.; Xu, F.-C.; Liao, W.-B.; Hu, C.-X.; Xu, P.-H.; Han, J.; Yuan, H.-L. Preparation of tanshinone ⅡA loaded nanostructured lipid carrier and its in vitro transdermal permeation characteristics. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi 2016, 41, 3232–3238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Altameemi, K.K.A.; Abd-Alhammid, S.N. Anastrozole Nanoparticles for Transdermal Delivery through Microneedles: Preparation and Evaluation. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results 2022, 13, 974–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Hutton, A.R.J.; Quinn, H.L.; McCague, P.J.; Jarrahian, C.; Rein-Weston, A.; Coffey, P.S.; Gerth-Guyette, E.; Zehrung, D.; Larrañeta, E.; Donnelly, R.F. Transdermal Delivery of Vitamin K Using Dissolving Microneedles for the Prevention of Vitamin K Deficiency Bleeding. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2018, 541, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. FT-IR spectra of pure substances - NTX, PVA, PVP and Poloxamer (P407) and NTX-excipients binary mixtures – NTX/PVA, NTX/PVP and NTX/P407.
Figure 1. FT-IR spectra of pure substances - NTX, PVA, PVP and Poloxamer (P407) and NTX-excipients binary mixtures – NTX/PVA, NTX/PVP and NTX/P407.
Preprints 208938 g001
Figure 2. Tips height (µm) of the prepared DMN patch formulations, mean ± SD (n=3).
Figure 2. Tips height (µm) of the prepared DMN patch formulations, mean ± SD (n=3).
Preprints 208938 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of DMN patch formulations MN-10%/2:1 (A), MN-20%/2:1 (B, E), MN-30%/2:1 (C), tip-curling phenomenon (D), truncated tip (F).
Figure 3. SEM images of DMN patch formulations MN-10%/2:1 (A), MN-20%/2:1 (B, E), MN-30%/2:1 (C), tip-curling phenomenon (D), truncated tip (F).
Preprints 208938 g003
Figure 4. Mechanical properties of the prepared SP patch formulations with respect to hardness (g), flexibility (m) and toughness (g/mm), mean ± SD (n=3).
Figure 4. Mechanical properties of the prepared SP patch formulations with respect to hardness (g), flexibility (m) and toughness (g/mm), mean ± SD (n=3).
Preprints 208938 g004
Figure 5. Parafilm penetration test of the prepared DMN patch formulations (number of holes per Parafilm layer), mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 5. Parafilm penetration test of the prepared DMN patch formulations (number of holes per Parafilm layer), mean ± SD (n = 3).
Preprints 208938 g005
Figure 6. In vitro release profiles of NTX from the prepared DMN and SP patch formulations, mean ± SD (n=3).
Figure 6. In vitro release profiles of NTX from the prepared DMN and SP patch formulations, mean ± SD (n=3).
Preprints 208938 g006
Figure 7. In vitro permeation profiles of NTX form the prepared DMN and SP patch formulations, mean ± SD (n=3).
Figure 7. In vitro permeation profiles of NTX form the prepared DMN and SP patch formulations, mean ± SD (n=3).
Preprints 208938 g007
Figure 8. Schematic visualization of the permeation mechanism of NTX from DMN and SP patches (A) and an illustration of good vs poor skin insertion (B).
Figure 8. Schematic visualization of the permeation mechanism of NTX from DMN and SP patches (A) and an illustration of good vs poor skin insertion (B).
Preprints 208938 g008aPreprints 208938 g008b
Figure 12. Schematic visualization of microneedle tips geometry.
Figure 12. Schematic visualization of microneedle tips geometry.
Preprints 208938 g012
Figure 13. Schematic visualization of the preparation of SP patches via solvent casting technique.
Figure 13. Schematic visualization of the preparation of SP patches via solvent casting technique.
Preprints 208938 g013
Figure 14. Schematic visualization of the compression force test (A) and Parafilm penetration test (B) of DMN patches using a texture analyzer TA-XT Plus, Stable Micro Systems, UK.
Figure 14. Schematic visualization of the compression force test (A) and Parafilm penetration test (B) of DMN patches using a texture analyzer TA-XT Plus, Stable Micro Systems, UK.
Preprints 208938 g014
Table 1. Composition of the prepared DMN and SP patches.
Table 1. Composition of the prepared DMN and SP patches.
DMN patches SP patches
MN-10%/2:1 MN-20%/1:1 MN-20%/2:1 MN-30%/2:1 SP-PVP:PVA SP-PVP:P407/1:1 SP-PVP:P407/2:1
DMN tips 30% PVP:PVA=2:1 30% PVP:P407=1:1 30%
PVP:P407=2:1
PVP:PVA=2:1
10% 20% 30% 30%
DMN backing layer 0.1% NTX
0.1% NTX
30% PVP:P407
2:1 1:1 2:1 2:1
Table 2. API (naltrexone hydrochloride) assay (%) per one patch, mean ± SD (n=3).
Table 2. API (naltrexone hydrochloride) assay (%) per one patch, mean ± SD (n=3).
Formulation code API assay, %
MN-10%/2:1 96.81 ± 3.52
MN-20%/1:1 98.17 ± 2.97
MN-20%/2:1 97.79 ± 4.11
MN-30%/2:1 97.53 ± 3.91
SP-PVP:PVA 98.12 ± 2.61
SP-PVP:P407/1:1 97.83 ± 3.24
SP-PVP:P407/2:1 96.46 ± 2.11
Table 3. Gelation temperature and gelling time of the prepared solutions upon buffer media with pH 7.4, mean ± SD (n=3).
Table 3. Gelation temperature and gelling time of the prepared solutions upon buffer media with pH 7.4, mean ± SD (n=3).
SP-PVP:P407/2:1 SP-PVP:P407/1:1 SP-PVP:P407/2:1 – API free SP-PVP:P407/2:1 – API free
gelation temperature, °C
34.21 ± 0.21 31.64 ± 0.32 33.90 ± 0.23 30.82 ± 0.51
gelling time, s
17.53 ± 0.58 9.17 ± 0.15 15.97 ± 0.17 8.32 ± 0.23
Table 4. Height reduction (%) of the prepared DMN patch formulations determined via mechanical strength test, mean ± SD (n = 3).
Table 4. Height reduction (%) of the prepared DMN patch formulations determined via mechanical strength test, mean ± SD (n = 3).
Parameter MN-10%/2:1 MN-20%/1:1 MN-20%/2:1 MN-30%/2:1
H1, µm 538.18 ± 41.31 613.03 ± 57.19 641.15 ± 18.32 554.08 ± 33.12
H2 , µm 267.23 ± 34.72 505.06 ± 44.98 554.25 ± 17.36 469.31 ± 28.12
height reduction, % 50.37 ± 3.47 17.61 ± 4.71 13.57 ± 1.43 15.34 ± 3.15
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated