Submitted:
20 April 2026
Posted:
21 April 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Low-Carbon Transition and HBNG
1.2. Urban Safety Risks of Buried Pipeline Leaks
1.3. Research Gap: From Fragmented Studies to Full-Chain Hazard Understanding
1.4. Scope and Contributions
2. Fundamental Mechanisms of HBNG Leakage Evolution
2.1. Key Properties
2.2. Source-Term Dynamics
2.3. Migration Mechanisms in Porous Soil Media
2.4. Cross-Medium Breakthrough and Enclosed Space Accumulation
3. Research Progress on the Full Hazard Chain
3.1. Research Progress on Underground Leakage and Soil Migration
3.1.1. Experimental Studies
3.1.2. Numerical Simulation Studies
3.1.3. Key Driving Factors and Engineering Implications
3.2. Surface Escape and Cloud Evolution
3.2.1. Surface Plumes and Escape
3.2.2. Accumulation in Semi-Enclosed Spaces
3.2.3. Pre-Ignition Flammable Cloud Dynamics
3.2.4. Key Driving Factors and Engineering Implications
4. Research Gaps and Future Perspectives
4.1. Fragmentation in Full-Chain Physical Evolution Research
4.2. Lack of Full-Scale Multi-Physics Coupled Experimental Data
4.3. Limitations in Soil Simulation
4.4. Bottlenecks in High-Resolution Measurement of Gas Clouds
4.5. Disconnection Between Mechanism Studies and Risk Assessment
4.6. Lag in Full-Lifecycle Integrity Management of Hydrogen-Blended Pipeline Networks
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kumar, N.; et al. Hydrogen Energy: Present Landscape and Future Prospects. Next Energy 2026, 11, 100537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maganza, A.; Gabetti, A.; Pastorino, P.; et al. Toward Sustainability: An Overview of the Use of Green Hydrogen in the Agriculture and Livestock Sector. Animals 2023, 13, 2561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Hydrogen Backbone. European Hydrogen Backbone Grows to Meet REPowerEU's 2030 Hydrogen Targets. Available online: https://ehb.eu/newsitem/european-hydrogen-backbone-grows-to-meet-repowereu-s-2030-hydrogen-targets (accessed on July 2025).
- Tan, H.; et al. Optimizing Energy Efficiency in Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Pipelines: Evaluating the Impact of Hydrogen Ratio on Calorific Value and Wobbe Index. Energy 2026, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, P.; et al. Decarbonization of Gas Transmission Pipelines via Hydrogen Blending: A Techno-Environmental Case Study Approach. Energy Convers. Manag. 2026, 351, 121010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bloj, M.D.; et al. Comprehensive Review of Hydrogen-Natural Gas Blending: Global Project Insights with a Focus on Implementation and Impact in Romanian Gas Networks. Heliyon 2025, 11, e01471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Topolski, K.; et al. Hydrogen Blending into Natural Gas Pipeline Infrastructure; NREL Technical Report NREL/TP-6A00-81704; National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Golden, CO, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.; et al. Numerical Research on Leakage Characteristics of Pure Hydrogen/Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas in Medium- and Low-Pressure Buried Pipelines. Energies 2024, 17, 2951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; et al. Simulation of Diffusion Characteristics and Risk Analysis of Natural Gas in an Underground Confined Space: A Case Study. ACS Omega 2025, 10, 18910–18923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, X.; et al. CFD Analysis of Leakage and Diffusion Characteristics in the Buried Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Pipeline. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 60, 354–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, H.; et al. CFD Analysis on Leakage and Diffusion of Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Pipeline in Soil-Brick Gutter Coupling Space. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2025, 100, 33–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.; et al. Study on Multicomponent Leakage and Diffusion Characteristics of Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas in Utility Tunnels. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 50, 740–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M.H.; et al. Numerical Investigation for Hazardous Gas Cloud Form and Dissipation Behavior of Hydrogen Blended Natural Gas in a Confined Space. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2025, 12, 241671. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Z.; et al. Investigation of Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Pipelines in Utility Tunnel Leakage and Development of an Accident Ventilation Strategy for the Worst Leakage Conditions. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 2667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, A.; et al. Hydrogen Blending in Natural Gas Pipelines: A Comprehensive Review of Material Compatibility and Safety Considerations. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, W.; et al. Experimental Study on Leakage and Diffusion of Buried Hydrogen Blended Natural Gas Pipeline. In Proceedings of the ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Gong, X.; et al. Research on Leakage and Diffusion Behavior of Hydrogen Doped Natural Gas in Integrated Pipeline Corridors Based on Data Drive. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 2860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bu, F.; et al. Analysis of Leakage and Diffusion Characteristics and Hazard Range Determination of Buried Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Pipeline Based on CFD. ACS Omega 2024, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, P.; et al. Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Leakage and Diffusion Characteristics Simulation and Ventilation Strategy in Utility Tunnels. Energies 2025, 18, 4504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ban, J.; et al. Research on Leakage Diffusion and Prediction Model of Multifactor High-Pressure Buried Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Pipeline. ACS Omega 2026, 11, 8154–8171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, L.; et al. Investigation on Leakage Characteristics and Consequences of Hydrogen-Blended Gas Pipelines Based on CFD with the Full Multicomponent Diffusion Model. Renew. Energy 2025, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahajan, D.; et al. Hydrogen Blending in Gas Pipeline Networks—A Review. Energies 2022, 15, 3582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, P.; et al. A Review of Challenges with Using the Natural Gas System for Hydrogen. Energy Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 3995–4009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joshi, A.; et al. Hydrogen Integration into Natural Gas Pipelines: Risk-Informed Analysis for Urban Distribution Networks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2025, 254, 110622. [Google Scholar]
- Qi, S.; et al. Flame Characteristics and Explosion Risk of Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas under High-Pressure and High-Equivalence-Ratio Conditions. Fuel 2025, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, Z.; et al. A Predictive Model for the Critical Ignition and Explosion Limits of Hydrogen-Doped Natural Gas. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2025, in press. [Google Scholar]
- Pang, L.; et al. Non-Uniform Methane/Hydrogen Explosions: Flame Propagation and Overpressure Characteristics. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2025, in press. [Google Scholar]
- Deng, B.; et al. Numerical Investigation on the Diffusion and Ventilation Characteristics of Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Leakage in Indoor Spaces. Buildings 2025, 15, 3833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; et al. Numerical Simulation of Diffusion Characteristics and Hazard Range of Multi-Hole Leakage from Buried Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Pipelines. Energies 2025, 18, 4309. [Google Scholar]
- Tian, Y.; et al. Numerical Investigation of Hydrogen Leakage Quantification and Dispersion Characteristics in Buried Pipelines. Materials 2025, 18, 4535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; et al. Study on Horizontal Leakage Diffusion Characteristics of Small and Medium Aperture in High-Pressure Natural Gas Pipelines with Large Open Spaces. ACS Omega 2025, 10, 10515–10529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, L.; Pang, X.; Zhang, R. Numerical Study on Small Hole Leakage and Diffusion of Hydrogen in Buried Pipelines. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 43704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, S.; et al. Effects of Soil Properties on the Diffusion of Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas from an Underground Pipe. Fluid Dyn. Mater. Process. 2025, 21, 1099–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, Z.; et al. Modeling and Assessment of Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Pipeline Leakage. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, in press. [Google Scholar]
- Dodangoda, C.; et al. Unlocking the Potential of Underground Hydrogen Storage for Clean Energy Solutions. Geomech. Geophys. Geo-Energy Geo-Resour. 2024, 10, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, B.; et al. Study of Methane Migration in the Shallow Subsurface from a Gas Pipe Leak. Elem. Sci. Anthropocene 2021, 9, 00008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, B.; et al. Leakage Characteristic Analysis and Hazard Level Assessment of Layered Soil for Natural Gas Pipeline. Available online: https://trid.trb.org/View/2547975 (accessed on July 2025).
- Li, M.; et al. Numerical Simulation Analysis of the Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Leakage and Ventilation Processes in a Domestic House. ACS Omega 2023, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Patel, P.; et al. A Computational Analysis of Similarity Relations Using Helium as a Surrogate of Hydrogen in Semi-Confined Facilities. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 91, 1113–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, K.; et al. Dynamic Evolution of Flame and Overpressure of Leakage and Explosion of Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas in Utility Tunnels. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, J.; Pan, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, H.; Feng, H.; Chen, D.; Kou, Y.; Yang, R. Leakage and Diffusion Behavior of a Buried Pipeline of Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 11592–11610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; et al. Simulation and Experiment of Leakage and Diffusion Characteristics of Buried Natural Gas Pipelines in Soil. Sci. Rep. 2024, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, J.; Wang, S.; Pan, J.; Lv, H.; Zhang, Y.; Han, H.; Liu, C.; Duo, Z.; Li, Y. Experimental Study on Leakage Temperature Field of Hydrogen Blending into Natural Gas Buried Pipeline. Appl. Energy 2024, 359, 122656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Tian, X. Numerical Investigation of the Leakage and Diffusion Characteristics of Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas in Long-Distance Pipelines. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, W.; et al. Diffusion Characterization of Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Leakage for Buried Pipeline Based on Simulation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2025, 99, 394–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eliyahu-Yakir, Y.; et al. From Mixing to Displacement of Miscible Phases in Porous Media: The Role of Heterogeneity and Inlet Pressures. Phys. Rev. Fluids 2024, 9, 084501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, R.; et al. A Finite Element-Inspired Hypergraph Neural Network: Application to Fluid Dynamics Simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 2024, 504, 112866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; et al. Analysis and Prediction of Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Diffusion from Various Pipeline Leakage Sources Based on CFD and ANN Approach. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 53, 535–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, Z.; et al. CFD Investigation on Leakage Mechanism of Natural Gas Pipeline: Flow Behavior and Quantity Estimation. J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 2025, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, S.; et al. Effects of Soil Properties on the Diffusion of Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas from Buried Pipelines. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1555256X25000621 (accessed on July 2025).
- Saccani, C.; et al. Analysis of the Existing Barriers for the Market Development of Power to Hydrogen (P2H) in Italy. Energies 2020, 13, 4835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, Z.; et al. Hazard Evolution of Different Orifice Shapes Leakage in Buried Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Pipelines. J. Saf. Sci. Resil. 2025, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, B.; et al. Hydrogen Blended Natural Gas Pipeline Leakage Detection Based on Multi-Domain Acoustic Feature Extraction and Deep Learning. In Process Saf. Environ. Prot.; 2026; in press. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, T.; Guo, Z. Dispersion Behavior after Leakage of Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. Rev. 2025, 18, 237–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, E.; et al. Research on the Leakage Characteristics of Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Pipelines. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2025, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rong, Y.; et al. Numerical Investigation on the Liquid Hydrogen Leakage and Protection Strategy. Processes 2023, 11, 1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, T.; et al. Numerical Simulation of Urban Natural Gas Leakage Dispersion: Evaluating the Impact of Wind Conditions and Urban Configurations. Atmosphere 2024, 15, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, W.L.; et al. Study on Valve Chamber Leakage and Diffusion Law of Hydrogen-Doped Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline. (Referenced in Gong et al. 2025).
- Ren, S.; et al. Research on the Dynamic Leaking and Diffusion Law of Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas under the Soil–Atmosphere Coupled Model. Energies 2024, 17, 5035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, X.; et al. Real-Time Prediction of Flammable Volume Ratio in the Coming Hydrogen Tunnels: A Hybrid CFD-Machine Learning Framework for Leakage Safety Management. Energy 2025, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, X.; et al. Study Progress on the Pipeline Transportation Safety of Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas. Heliyon 2023, 9, e21454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, P.; et al. Effect of Hydrogen-Blended Ratio on the Leakage and Diffusion of Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas in Double-Row Kitchens. Fuel 2026, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, S.; et al. Hazard Analysis and Control Measures for Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Leakage in Utility Tunnels. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2025, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, X.; et al. Experimental and Numerical Research of Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Leakage and Diffusion in Utility Tunnels. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2025, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; et al. A Leakage Detection Method for Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Pipelines in Utility Tunnels Based on Multi-Task LSTM and CFD Simulation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2025, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shui, Y.; et al. Tunnel-Based Numerical Analysis and Risk Mitigation of High-Pressure Pure-Hydrogen Pipeline Leakage. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2026, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsuura, K.; et al. Sensing-Based Risk Mitigation Control of Hydrogen Dispersion and Accumulation in a Partially Open Space with Low-Height Openings by Forced Ventilation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 1972–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glover, A.; et al. Modeling and Risk Assessment of Hydrogen/Natural Gas Blends. In Proceedings of the DOE Hydrogen Program 2024 Annual Merit Review, 2024; Available online: https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/docs/hydrogenprogramlibraries/pdfs/review24/scs035_glover_2024_p.pdf (accessed on July 2025).
- Li, C.Y.; et al. Assessment of Releases from Hydrogen and Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Pipelines: A Review of Dispersion, Fire, and Explosion Hazards. J. Saf. Sci. Resil. 2025, in press. [Google Scholar]
- Han, Z.; et al. Full-Scale Pipeline Experimental Study on Combustion Flame Characteristics of Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Crack Leakage. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2026, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bu, F.; et al. A Review of Research on Leakage and Diffusion Characteristics of Buried Gas Pipelines. J. Saf. Sci. Resil. 2025, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, B.; et al. Leakage Characteristic Analysis and Hazard Level Classification of Gas Pipelines Considering Layered Soil Backfilling. J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 2025, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; et al. Study on the Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Leakage and Flare-Up in the Typical Semi-Open Space. Fire 2025, 8, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khaing, M.M.; et al. Lifecycle Management of Hydrogen Pipelines: Design, Integrity, and Risk Assessment. Energies 2025, 18, 240. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, T.; et al. A Review of Optimization Methods for Pipeline Monitoring Systems. Energies 2025, 18, 3591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, R.; et al. Research Gaps in Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) of Hydrogen Transmission Pipelines. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, R.; et al. Research Gaps and Future Directions in Quantitative Risk Assessment for Low-Carbon Hydrogen-Blended Pipeline Networks. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2026, in press. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.; et al. Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Pipeline Integrity Management in Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Systems. Processes 2025, 13, 3963. [Google Scholar]
- Gregorovičová, E.; et al. Hydrogen Safety in Energy Infrastructure: A Review. Energies 2025, 18, 5470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Reference (Year, Journal) | Core Focus Stage | Full-Chain Coverage | Typical Limitations |
| Li J, et al. (2024, Energies) [8] | Numerical simulation of medium/low pressure buried leakage | Underground stage only | Ignores surface escape and cloud accumulation |
| Liu X, et al. (2024, Int J Hydrogen Energy) [10] | Leakage and diffusion of buried HBNG pipelines | Underground seepage-diffusion coupling | Lack of semi-confined space transition |
| Lu H, et al. (2025, Int J Hydrogen Energy) [11] | Soil-brick trench coupled spatial leakage | Underground-surface coupling | Does not cover pre-ignition cloud evolution |
| Wang K, et al. (2024, Int J Hydrogen Energy) [12] | Multicomponent leakage and diffusion in utility tunnels | Semi-confined space cloud | No full-chain input from underground stage |
| Li MH, et al. (2025, Royal Society Open Science) [13] | Hazardous cloud formation in enclosed spaces | Cloud accumulation and dispersion | Ignores buried source term |
| Xu Z, et al. (2024, Appl Sci) [14] | Ventilation strategies for utility tunnel leakage | Risk mitigation in semi-enclosed spaces | Static scenario assumption |
| Islam A, et al. (2024, Int J Hydrogen Energy) [15] | Review of HBNG pipeline materials and safety | General safety assessment | No specific full-chain analysis of buried pipelines |
| Guo W, et al. (2025, ASME PVP) [16] | Buried experimental validation of leakage and diffusion | Underground + partial surface | Limited experimental scale, no connection to cloud behavior |
| Gong X, et al. (2025, Sci Rep) [17] | Data-driven diffusion in utility tunnels | Semi-confined space cloud (same as above) | Relies on numerical assumptions |
| Bu F, et al. (2024, ACS Omega) [18] | Underground leakage + soil diffusion + partial surface | Primarily underground, limited surface consideration | Static hazard range, does not cover pre-ignition cloud dynamics |
| Xiao P, et al. (2025, Energies) [19] | HBNG leakage and ventilation in utility tunnels | Surface release and cloud accumulation | Lacks upstream soil transport preconditioning |
| Ban J, et al. (2026, ACS Omega) [20] | Multi-factor high-pressure buried leakage and diffusion | Subsurface migration and predictive modeling | Strong soil heterogeneity, but not connected to cloud behavior |
| Wu L, et al. (2025, Renewable Energy) [21] | Leakage and diffusion characteristics and consequences of small-hole buried pipeline | Underground leakage – soil diffusion – surface hazard zone / explosion zone consequences | Numerical simulation assumptions, no experimental validation or full-chain ventilation strategy included |
| Physical property | Typical value for hydrogen (H₂) | Typical value for natural gas (CH₄) | Typical value for HBNG (20% blend) | Hazard significance for post-leakage dispersion, dilution, stratification and flammable cloud formation | Reference |
| Density (kg/m³) (kg/m³) | 0.0899 | 0.6681 | Reduced by approx. 10–15% | Enhanced buoyancy, rapid gas rise and stratification, shortened cloud accumulation time, expanded above-ground hazard range | Islam, et al. (2024) [15] |
| Diffusion coefficient (cm²/s) | 0.61 | 0.16 | Increased by approx. 3–4 times | Faster and wider diffusion, shortened FDT, improved dilution efficiency but accelerated hazardous cloud formation | Joshi ,et al. (2025)[24]; Deng et al. (2025) [28] |
| Viscosity (10⁻⁵ Pa·s) | 0.89 | 1.11 | Slightly reduced | Increased leakage flow rate, higher escape velocity through cracks, accelerated underground migration | Ban, et al. (2026) [20]; Wang H et al. (2025) [29] |
| Flammable range (vol%) | 4–75 | 5–15 | LEL decreased, UEL increased | Expanded hazardous concentration range, increased probability of flammable cloud formation | Qi et, al. (2025); Su et al. (2025) [25,26] |
| Minimum ignition energy (mJ) | 0.02 | 0.29 | Significantly reduced | Greatly increased ignition probability, post-leakage cloud more easily ignited by tiny energy sources | Pang, et al. (2025) [27] |
| Burning velocity (m/s) | 2.1–3.25 | 0.4 | Increased by 1–5 times | Faster explosion pressure rise rate, enhanced destructiveness, more severe explosion consequences of the cloud | Tan, et al. (2026) [4] |
| Mechanism | Main driving factors | Influence of soil heterogeneity/boundary effects | Hazard significance for underground migration and breakthrough | Representative reference |
| Advection | Pressure gradient, permeability | Heterogeneous backfill creates preferential pathways; moisture content layers block vertical flow | Accelerates near-field seepage, shortens surface breakthrough time by 20%–50% | Xia Z et al. (2024) [34] |
| Diffusion | Concentration gradient, hydrogen molecular characteristics | Layered media alter local diffusion coefficients | Enhanced molecular transport, but boundary effects limit uniform dilution | Liu X et al. (2024) [10] |
| Dispersion | Soil particle size, porosity variation | Heterogeneity introduces mechanical mixing, expands lateral range | Hazard radius increases by 11.9%–15.4%, cloud formation accelerated | Ban J et al. (2026) [20] |
| Boundary effect | Backfill heterogeneity, stratification, moisture content | Backfill boundaries dominate fingering migration and saturation barriers | Non-linear change in FDT, significant deflection of horizontal and vertical diffusion paths | Li J et al. (2024) [8]; Zheng B (2025) [37] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).