Submitted:
17 April 2026
Posted:
20 April 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Methodology
2.1. Data Sources
2.2. Statistical Techniques
3. Results
3.1. Correlation Between Sources
3.2. Abundance Distributions
3.3. Isomeric Family Variations
3.4. Statistical Distributions
3.5. Abundance Ratio Analysis
- Minimum: CH3CHO (0.92×) – nearly identical abundances
- Maximum: HC3N (488.89×) – extreme enrichment in IRAS 16293B
- Median: ∼3× for O-bearing, ∼15× for N-bearing
3.6. Molecular Class Comparison
4. Discussion
4.1. Chemical Similarity Across Mass Scales
4.2. Model Comparison
- Predicting the correct isomeric ratios (e.g., C2H4O2 family)
- Matching the observed N-bearing/O-bearing abundance ratios
- Reproducing the narrow observed abundance ranges
4.3. Comet-Interstellar Connection
- Extreme enrichment of C2H5OH and CH3CHO in 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko
- Near-absence of some interstellar-abundant species (e.g., CH3OCH3)
- Generally higher absolute abundances in cometary ice
4.4. Implications for COM Formation Mechanisms
Grain surface formation
- Ice mantle thickness and layering
- Thermal history (peak temperature, warm-up timescale)
- Radiation field intensity affecting radical production
Gas-phase chemistry
- Activate ion-molecule reactions with N2 or NH3
- Enable efficient CN radical insertion into hydrocarbons
- Facilitate atomic nitrogen reactions with organic radicals
Isomeric selection
- Formation occurs at specific temperatures where certain barriers become accessible
- Structural isomers form through different pathways, not by interconversion
- Observational abundance ratios preserve information about formation conditions
4.5. Systematic Uncertainties
5. Conclusions
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
| Molecule | IRAS | Sgr | Model | 67P | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | ||
| CH3OH | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | O-bearing |
| H2CO | 19 | 48 | 150 | ... | O-bearing |
| C2H5OH | 2.3 | 5.0 | 1.3 | 19 | O-bearing |
| CH3OCH3 | 2.4 | 5.5 | 0.96 | ... | O-bearing |
| CH3OCHO | 2.6 | 3.0 | 0.59 | 1.6 | O-bearing |
| CH2OHCHO | 0.34 | 0.33 | 3.8 | ... | O-bearing |
| CH3COOH | 0.028 | 0.050 | 0.0012 | ... | O-bearing |
| CH3CHO | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 22 | O-bearing |
| c-C2H4O | 0.054 | ... | ... | ... | O-bearing |
| CH3OCH2OH | 1.4 | 1.7 | 0.44 | 5.2 | O-bearing |
| (CH2OH)2 | 0.99 | ... | ... | ... | O-bearing |
| CH3COCH3 | 0.17 | 1.0 | 2.2 | ... | O-bearing |
| C2H5CHO | 0.022 | ... | ... | ... | O-bearing |
| NH2CHO | 0.10 | 8.8 | 2.0 | 1.9 | N-bearing |
| CH3CN | 0.40 | 5.5 | 0.028 | 2.8 | N-bearing |
| CH3NC | 0.002 | 0.025 | ... | ... | O-bearing |
| HNCO | 0.37 | 5.0 | 3.4 | 13 | N-bearing |
| HC3N | 0.0018 | 0.88 | 0.24 | 0.19 | O-bearing |
| CH3SH | 0.048 | 0.85 | 0.018 | 18 | O-bearing |
| CH3NCO | 0.040 | 0.55 | 0.026 | ... | O-bearing |
| C2H5CN | 0.036 | 16 | 0.33 | ... | N-bearing |
| C2H3CN | 0.0074 | 1.1 | 0.056 | ... | N-bearing |
| CH3CONH2 | 0.025 | 0.35 | 0.11 | ... | N-bearing |
| HONO | 0.009 | 0.030 | ... | ... | O-bearing |
| CH2CO | 0.48 | 0.83 | 0.13 | ... | O-bearing |
| HCOOH | 0.56 | 0.23 | 6.2 | ... | O-bearing |
| Source | O-bearing Mean | N-bearing Mean | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | (%) | ||
| IRAS 16293B | 1.67 ± 0.52 | 0.16 ± 0.11 | |
| Sgr B2(N2) | 1.49 ± 0.45 | 6.13 ± 2.87 | |
| Model | 3.82 ± 1.35 | 1.02 ± 0.64 | |
| 67P | 11.5 ± 3.2 | 4.7 ± 2.1 |
| Molecule | Ratio |
|---|---|
| O-bearing molecules | |
| CH3CHO | 0.92 |
| HCOOH | 0.41 |
| CH2OHCHO | 0.97 |
| CH3OCHO | 1.15 |
| CH3OCH2OH | 1.21 |
| CH3COOH | 1.79 |
| C2H5OH | 2.17 |
| H2CO | 2.53 |
| CH3OCH3 | 2.29 |
| CH3COCH3 | 5.88 |
| CH2CO | 1.73 |
| CH3SH | 17.7 |
| N-bearing molecules | |
| CH3CN | 13.75 |
| HNCO | 13.51 |
| CH3NC | 12.5 |
| CH3NCO | 13.75 |
| NH2CHO | 88.0 |
| C2H3CN | 148.6 |
| CH3CONH2 | 14.0 |
| C2H5CN | 444.4 |
| HC3N | 488.9 |
References
- Herbst, E.; van Dishoeck, E.F. Complex organic interstellar molecules. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2009, 47, 427–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bergin, E.A.; Tafalla, M. Cold dark clouds: the initial conditions for star formation. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2012, 50, 65–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jørgensen, J.K.; et al. The ALMA Protostellar Interferometric Line Survey (PILS)-first results from an unbiased submillimeter wavelength line survey of the Class 0 protostellar binary IRAS…. Astron. Astrophys. 2016, 595, A117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belloche, A.; et al. Exploring molecular complexity with ALMA (EMoCA): Deuterated complex organic molecules in Sagittarius B2 (N2). Astron. Astrophys. 2016, 587, A91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manigand, S.; et al. The ALMA-PILS survey: inventory of complex organic molecules towards IRAS 16293–2422 A. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 635, A48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altwegg, K.; et al. The ortho-to-para ratio of water in interstellar clouds. Phil. Tran. R. Soc. A 2017, 375, 20160253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sharma, K.; Das, D.; Ray, S. Research status of the periodic table: a bibliometric analysis. Found. Chem. 2024, 26, 301–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, K.; Das, D.; Ray, S. Hertzsprung–Russell diagram: A bibliometric analysis for the status report of research in the period 1991–2023. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 2026, 2650050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, K.; Das, D.; Ray, S. From Color–Magnitude Diagram and Hertzsprung–Russell Diagram: Mapping the bibliometric trajectory of stellar evolution diagrams. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 2026, 35, 2550086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jørgensen, J.K.; Favre, C.; Bisschop, S.E.; et al. Detection of the simplest sugar, glycolaldehyde, in a solar-type protostar with ALMA. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2012, 757, L4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belloche, A.; et al. Re-exploring Molecular Complexity with ALMA (ReMoCA): Interstellar detection of urea. Astron. Astrophys. 2019, 628, A10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belloche, A.; et al. Re-exploring Molecular Complexity with ALMA: Insights into chemical differentiation from the molecular composition of hot cores in Sgr B2 (N2). Astron. Astrophys. 2025, 698, A143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drozdovskaya, M.N.; et al. Ingredients for solar-like systems: protostar IRAS 16293-2422 B versus comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019, 490, 50–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robitaille, T.P. et al. (Astropy Collaboration). Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy. Astron. Astrophys. 2013, 558, A33. [CrossRef]
- Pérez, F.; Granger, B.E. IPython: a system for interactive scientific computing. Comput. Sci. Engg. 2007, 9, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harris, C.R.; et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature 2020, 585, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McKinney, W. Data structures for statistical computing in Python. In Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, 2010; pp. 56–61. [Google Scholar]
- Virtanen, P.; et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nature Meth. 2020, 17, 261–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]






Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.