Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Beyond 42 Days: A National Cohort Study of Maternal and Late Maternal Deaths in Brazil from 2010 to 2023

Submitted:

05 April 2026

Posted:

07 April 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Background/Objectives: Maternal mortality is a serious public health problem and reflects social, ethnic, racial, and regional inequalities in access to and quality of obstetric care. Despite advances in the surveillance and investigation of maternal deaths in Brazil, late maternal deaths (occurring between 43 days and 1 year after birth) are still underestimated and underexplored. Therefore, the objective of this study was to analyze the distribution and factors associated with maternal deaths and late maternal deaths in Brazil between 2010 and 2023. Methods: This was a population-based, retrospective cohort study with a quantitative approach, using secondary data from the Mortality Information System. All maternal deaths (Chapter XV of ICD-10) and late deaths recorded during the period were included. Sociodemographic, clinical, and administrative variables were analyzed. Statistical tests of association (chi-square, test of proportions, and 95% CI) were used, with a significance level of 5%. Results: A total of 26,953 deaths were identified, of which 24,387 were maternal and 2,566 were late deaths. Most deaths occurred among single, mixed-race women with 8 to 11 years of schooling, and residing in the Southeast region. Late deaths were more frequent in the South and among women aged 40 to 49. The main causes were direct obstetric conditions. A statistically significant association was observed between the type of death and sociodemographic variables. Conclusions: The results highlight structural inequalities in maternal mortality in Brazil and reinforce the importance of expanding postpartum surveillance beyond 42 days, with a focus on equity and continuity of care.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Maternal mortality is an important indicator of public health and social inequality, reflecting not only the quality of obstetric care, but also the social and structural determinants that affect women of reproductive age. Globally, the incidence of maternal mortality varies widely. Some countries, such as Malta, report very low rates, with only two maternal deaths recorded between 2010 and 2023, one in 2010 and another in 2023 [1,2].
The World Health Organization (WHO) defines a maternal death as the death of a woman while pregnant or within 42 days of the termination of pregnancy, from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management, excluding accidental or incidental causes [3]. This 42-day threshold has long been used in surveillance systems and mortality estimates across countries.
However, there is growing recognition that limiting maternal death surveillance to this early postpartum window may obscure a significant burden of mortality that occurs later. Deaths between 43 days and one year postpartum are classified by the WHO as late maternal deaths, yet these events are often underreported and underexamined in national datasets [4]. According to studies from high-income countries, including the United States and the United Kingdom up to one half of pregnancy-related deaths occur after the 42-day threshold [5,6]. Many of these deaths are associated with cardiovascular, hypertensive, or mental health conditions that emerge or worsen during the extended postpartum period. Late maternal deaths are also less likely to be investigated, reported, or formally linked to the index pregnancy, which contributes to the underestimation of maternal mortality worldwide. Emerging global evidence suggests that late maternal deaths are not only more common than previously understood but may also reflect gaps in postpartum care, particularly for women with chronic conditions, psychosocial stress, or structural vulnerabilities [6,7].
Global variation in maternal mortality also highlights the influence of health system strength and social conditions. In Malta, for example, only two maternal deaths were recorded between 2010 and 2023, illustrating how rare such deaths can be under conditions of strong surveillance and comprehensive care [1,2]. By contrast, countries such as Brazil continue to experience elevated maternal mortality ratios and persistent disparities related to race, region, and education Although Brazil has expanded its maternal death surveillance and investigation systems over the past two decades, late maternal deaths remain poorly captured and insufficiently studied. Further, there is a need to deepen knowledge about the profile of women who die from causes related to pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium, contributing to identifying racial, educational and regional inequalities throughout Brazil [8,9].
Maternal mortality is an important indicator of the quality of health systems. In Brazil, between 1990 and 2019, there was a reduction of approximately 49% in the maternal mortality ratio (MMR), falling from over 100 to approximately 50 deaths per 100,000 live births, according to data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) [10,11].
However, despite this progress, Brazil’s MMR remains above global targets. The GBD study highlighted that, although there has been a decrease in deaths related to hypertensive diseases, indirect causes, such as pre-existing conditions, have become responsible for the majority of cases in most states [10]. The COVID-19 pandemic further aggravated this situation. In 2020, the MMR jumped from 57 to 67 per 100,000 live births, and in 2021, it reached a staggering 107 deaths per 100,000, according to an analysis by Tenório et al (2022) [12].
There are also striking regional and socio-ethnic disparities. Black women have almost twice the MMR compared to white women (125.8 vs. 64.1 per 100,000), and Indigenous women have up to 115 per 100,000, while the national average is around 68 per 100,000 [9]. Between 2010 and 2019, Brazil recorded an average of 5 late deaths per 100,000 births, with an estimated growth trend of 9.8% per year. Inequalities are evident across regions. In the South, the coefficient fell from 53.4 to 36.8 per 100,000 between 2000 and 2018, below the national average but still above the WHO target (<20). In the Northeast, since 2009, there has been a decline, although areas with high rates persist, such as Piauí and Maranhão [13,14].
This study aims to address that gap by analyzing maternal and late maternal deaths in Brazil from 2010 to 2023. We hypothesize that deaths occurring after the 42-day period differ significantly from early maternal deaths in terms of sociodemographic characteristics, underlying causes, and regional distribution. By comparing these two categories, we aim to improve understanding of late maternal mortality and to inform strategies for extending postpartum surveillance and care to better reach those at highest risk.
Given the above, the following questions arise: what are the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics associated with maternal deaths and late maternal deaths in Brazil between 2010 and 2023, and how do these occurrences differ from each other? The central hypothesis of this study is that maternal and late maternal deaths in Brazil do not occur homogeneously, but rather present significant differences in terms of sociodemographic (such as age, skin color, education, and marital status), clinical (such as direct or indirect obstetric causes), and regional (according to the area of ​​residence) factors. Furthermore, it is assumed that most late maternal deaths occur after the 42-day postpartum surveillance period, highlighting the need to expand postpartum monitoring. Therefore, the present study aimed to analyze the distribution and factors associated with maternal deaths and late maternal deaths in Brazil between 2010 and 2023, identifying sociodemographic, clinical, and regional patterns.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This is a population-based, retrospective cohort study with a quantitative approach, developed from the analysis of secondary records from the Sistema de Informação sobre Mortalidade (SIM), made available by the Departamento de Informática do Sistema Único de Saúde (DATASUS). The investigation was designed according to the recommendations of the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) for observational studies [15,16].

2.2. Study Location

The study covers the entire Brazilian territory, including the 27 federative units, and refers to the period between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2020. The database used was obtained through the DATASUS website (http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/tabcgi.exe?sim/cnv/mat10uf.def), which allows public access to microdata on maternal deaths recorded in SIM. The data were consulted based on the latest public update available until December 2024, including final records with a date of death up to the year 2023. All information refers to the place of residence of the deceased, and not to the place where the death occurred.

2.3. Study population

The study population consisted of all Brazilian women whose deaths were recorded as maternal deaths (ICD-10 codes O00–O99) and late maternal deaths (occurring between 43 days and 1 year after the end of pregnancy), and recorded in the national SIM database during the period analyzed. The age range of women analyzed included all reproductive ages (10 to 49 years), with additional inclusions for cases outside this age range, according to the WHO maternal death criteria. All maternal deaths of Brazilian residents were included, regardless of age, as long as they met the World Health Organization definition criteria for maternal mortality. No sampling was applied, since the purpose of the study was to analyze all records available in the national SIM public database for the period in question. In total, 24,387 maternal deaths and 2,566 late maternal deaths were identified.

2.4. Study Variables

The variables analyzed were grouped according to sociodemographic, clinical and administrative categories: sociodemographic variables (age group, skin color, marital status, education level and region of residence); clinical variables (ICD-10 chapter and specific causes, type of obstetric cause (direct, indirect or unspecified maternal death) and time of death in relation to the pregnancy-puerperal cycle); administrative variables (status of death investigation (with summary record informed, without record, or not investigated); and the main outcome (occurrence of maternal death and late maternal death, as defined by SIM and ICD-10 (chapter XV: O00–O99) and related categories such as A34 and F53).
In cases where there was inconsistency between the declared cause of death (maternal or otherwise) and the time reported (pregnancy, childbirth, puerperium up to 42 days, puerperium from 43 days to less than 1 year or outside these periods), the type of underlying cause of death was adopted as the classification criterion, prioritizing it over the declared time. Despite advances, the fields in the Death Certificate that indicate the time of death (fields 43 and 44) ​​still have a high percentage of non-completion or inconsistent completion, which may limit the analysis of late maternal deaths.
It is important to note that in 2011, there was a change in the Death Certificate model, with greater detailing of the variables collected. This year, both models (old and new) were used simultaneously, and there may be variations in the filling patterns. For additional details on this transition, it is recommended to consult the official document "Sistema de Informação sobre Mortalidade - SIM. Consolidation of the 2011 database". In addition, on April 1, 2020, the Ministry of Health updated the SIM files related to deaths that occurred in 2019, which resulted in the change of the underlying cause of four records and the exclusion of one record.

2.5. Data Analysis

Initially, a descriptive analysis of the absolute and relative frequencies of maternal and late maternal deaths was performed according to the variables of interest. Proportions (%) were calculated in relation to the total number of maternal (n=24,387) and late (n=2,566) deaths recorded in the period. The data were organized in tables according to ICD-10 categories, sociodemographic and administrative characteristics. Additionally, time trend analysis (such as Prais-Winsten regression) and calculation of maternal mortality ratios per 100,000 live births can be applied, through integration with data from the Sistema de Informação sobre Nascidos Vivos (SINASC). The main outcome analyzed was maternal death and late maternal death, as recorded in the SIM. Live birth data from SINASC were used only to calculate indicators such as the MMR, when applicable. All data were analyzed using electronic spreadsheets (Microsoft Excel®). The analyses were performed in R software (version 4.3) using the stats, epitools, dplyr and ggplot2 packages for organization, statistical analysis and data visualization [17].
The investigation of the central hypothesis of the study was conducted through descriptive and inferential analyses, focusing on the comparison between early and late maternal deaths according to sociodemographic and clinical variables. For statistical analysis, comparisons were made between maternal and late deaths according to sociodemographic variables, using different tests depending on the nature of the data. Pearson’s chi-square test (χ²) was used to verify the existence of an association between the type of death (maternal or late) and the categorical variables: age group, skin color, marital status, education level and region of residence. In cases where the expected frequencies in one or more cells were less than 5, as observed in the age group categories “10 to 14 years” and “50 to 59 years” and in the “indigenous” category of the skin color variable, Fisher’s exact test was applied, which is more appropriate for small samples. Additionally, proportion comparison tests (Z-test) were performed to assess, in a specific manner, statistically significant differences between the distribution of maternal and late deaths in the categories of each variable. For each comparison, the respective p values ​​and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) of the difference between the proportions were calculated. When necessary, categories with low frequency were regrouped in order to meet the assumptions of the tests applied. All statistical analyses considered a significance level of 5% (α=0.05).

2.6. Ethical Aspects

This study used secondary data from the public domain, available without identifying the subjects by name, ensuring the anonymity of the information. In accordance with Resolution No. 510/2016 of the National Health Council, which waives the need for ethical assessment for studies with public and anonymous databases, this study is exempt from submission to the Research Ethics Committee [18]. Even so, all stages of the study were conducted in compliance with the ethical and legal principles in force for health research in Brazil.

3. Results

The highest proportion of maternal deaths occurred among women aged 30 to 39 (40.8%), followed by those aged 20 to 29 (38.8%). These two age groups accounted for almost 80% of deaths, which reflects the period of greatest fertility for women. Adolescents aged 15 to 19 accounted for 11.2% of deaths, while girls aged 10 to 14 accounted for 0.8%, standing out as a particularly vulnerable group. In the 40 to 49 age group, mortality was 8.3%, but proportionally, they accounted for 10.1% of late deaths, suggesting a higher risk of long-term complications. Women aged 50 or over barely appear in the records.
Most maternal deaths occurred among brown women (52.1%), followed by white women (31.8%) and black women (11.1%). Indigenous and Asian women accounted for 1.6% and 0.2%, respectively. This distribution indicates significant racial inequality, especially when considering the proportional underrepresentation of white women among late deaths (35.1%) in relation to brown women (47.2%). Black women (black and brown women combined) account for more than 63% of maternal deaths and approximately 61.7% of late deaths, highlighting structural inequalities in access, quality of care and health outcomes.
Single women accounted for the majority of deaths, accounting for 48.3% of maternal deaths and 53.7% of late deaths. Married women were the second most affected group (28.4% and 26%, respectively). This data suggests that social and family support may be related to the outcomes, or that marital status is a marker of other socioeconomic vulnerabilities. It is also worth noting the significant proportion of missing data (7.4% and 6.3%), which limits a more precise analysis.
Most maternal deaths occurred among women with 8 to 11 years of schooling (39%), followed by those with 4 to 7 years (22.9%). Women with higher education or more accounted for only 11.5% of deaths, indicating that higher education tends to be a protective factor. On the other hand, 15.2% of the information on education was missing, which compromises part of the analysis. Late deaths followed a similar trend, with a predominance among women with 8 to 11 years of schooling (39.2%) and 4 to 7 years (25.9%).
Maternal deaths were concentrated in the Southeast region (35.3%), followed by the Northeast (32.6%) and North (13.7%). However, when we look at late deaths, there is a relative increase in the South (18.4%), suggesting possible regional differences in the quality of care and postpartum surveillance. The Southeast maintained the highest absolute number of late deaths (37.8%), possibly reflecting the greater number of births and/or better reporting. The North, although representing 13.7% of maternal deaths, accounts for only 8.2% of late deaths, which may indicate underreporting or less tracking of late causes.
Table 1. Distribution of maternal and late maternal deaths according to sociodemographic characteristics (n=26,953). Brazil 2010-2023.
Table 1. Distribution of maternal and late maternal deaths according to sociodemographic characteristics (n=26,953). Brazil 2010-2023.
Variable Maternal deaths (n) % Maternal deaths Late deaths (n) % Late deaths
Age
10 to 14 years 202 0.8% 10 0.4%
15 to 19 years 2,730 11.2% 256 10%
20 to 29 years 9,466 38.8% 1,023 39.9%
30 to 39 years 9,942 40.8% 1,018 39.7%
40 to 49 years 2,017 8.3% 258 10.1%
50 to 59 years 27 0.1% - -
Ignored 3 0% 1 0%
Skin color
White 7,768 31.8% 902 35.1%
Black 2,711 11.1% 373 14.5%
Yellow 59 0.2% 2 0.1%
Brown 12,710 52.1% 1,212 47.2%
Indigenous 392 1.6% 18 0.7%
Ignored 747 3.1% 59 2.3%
Marital status
Single 11,796 48.3% 1,379 53.7%
Married 6,923 28.4% 667 26%
Widow 143 0.6% 18 0.7%
Legally separated 450 1.8% 64 2.5%
Other 3,260 13.4% 277 10.8%
Ignored 1,815 7.4% 161 6.3%
Education
None 589 2.4% 40 1.6%
1 to 3 years 2,197 9% 248 9.7%
4 to 7 years 5,593 22.9% 664 25.9%
8 to 11 years 9,516 39% 1,005 39.2%
12 years and over 2,796 11.5% 251 9.8%
Ignored 3,696 15.2% 358 13.9%
Region of residence
North 3,349 13.7% 211 8.2%
North East 7,944 32.6% 730 28.5%
Southeast 8,612 35.3% 969 37.8%
South 2,400 9.8% 472 18.4%
Midwest 2,082 8.5% 184 7.2%
Total 24,387 100% 2,566 100%
Source: Prepared by the authors. Brazil, 2025.
Analysis of data on the causes and characteristics of maternal deaths according to the International Classification of Diseases – 10th Revision (ICD-10) shows that almost all deaths are directly related to the pregnancy-puerperal cycle. Of the 24,387 maternal deaths recorded, 98.7% (24,058) were classified in Chapter XV of ICD-10, which covers direct obstetric causes, while only 1.3% (305) were distributed among chapters of indirect causes, such as infectious diseases, mental disorders and neoplasms. Among these, HIV infection was the main cause identified, responsible for 304 deaths (1.2%).
When detailing the specific causes within the obstetric chapter, it is observed that “other obstetric conditions not elsewhere classified” (NCOP) lead with 35.1% of deaths (8,564), followed by hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (19.6%), complications of labor and delivery (14.4%) and complications related to the puerperium (12.6%). Abortion was the cause of 1,785 deaths (7.3%), standing out as an important public health problem, especially considering the context of legal restrictions and barriers to access to safe services. Notably, only 1 death was classified directly under the code “childbirth”, which suggests that complications are usually related to events secondary to labor itself.
Regarding the time of death, most maternal deaths occurred in the puerperium up to 42 days after delivery (57.3%), followed by deaths during pregnancy, delivery or abortion (29.4%). Late deaths (from 43 days to less than 1 year after delivery) accounted for only 3.9% of maternal deaths, but represented 93.5% of late deaths (2,400 of 2,566). This data highlights the importance of expanding surveillance beyond the 42 days of the puerperium, especially considering the prolonged risk of maternal morbidity and mortality.
Analysis of the type of maternal death shows a predominance of direct obstetric causes (61.6%), such as hemorrhages, puerperal infections and hypertensive disorders, while indirect obstetric causes, associated with pre-existing diseases or diseases acquired during pregnancy that are aggravated by the course of pregnancy (such as infections and cardiovascular diseases), accounted for 35.3%. In 3.1% of cases, the nature of death was not specified, indicating a limitation in the quality of the information recorded.
Regarding the status of death investigations, it was observed that 90.8% of maternal deaths were investigated with a summary record, demonstrating broad surveillance coverage. However, 6.8% of cases were not investigated, which represents a significant weakness in determining the causes and circumstances of these deaths. Regarding late deaths, the percentage of investigations is even higher: 93.6% had a summary record, reflecting the growing attention of obstetric surveillance to this type of occurrence.
Table 2. Maternal and late maternal deaths according to clinical causes and investigation (n=26,953). Brazil 2010-2023.
Table 2. Maternal and late maternal deaths according to clinical causes and investigation (n=26,953). Brazil 2010-2023.
Variable Maternal deaths (n) % Maternal deaths Late deaths (n) % Late deaths
Chapter ICD-10
I. Some infectious and parasitic diseases 35 1.3% - -
II. Neoplasms (tumors) 6 0% - -
V. Mental and behavioral disorders 18 0.1% - -
XV. Pregnancy, childbirth and puerperium 24,058 98.7% 2,566 100%
Specific causes (ICD-10)
Other bacterial diseases 1 0% 0 0%
Human immunodeficiency disease 304 1.2% 0 0%
Neoplasm of uncertain or unknown behavior 6 0% 0 0%
Behavioral syndromes associated with physiological dysfunction and physical factors 18 0.1% 0 0%
Pregnancy ending in miscarriage 1,785 7,3% 0 0%
Edema, proteinuria and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy 4,777 19.6% 0 0%
Other maternal disorders related to pregnancy predominance 1,000 4.1% 0 0%
Assist mother with fetal cavities and amniotic fluid problems 1,354 5.6% 0 0%
Complications of labor and delivery 3,502 14.4% 0 0%
Childbirth 1 0% 0 0%
Complications related to the predominance of the puerperium 3,075 12.6% 0 0%
Other obstetric conditions NCOP 8,564 35.1% 2,566 100%
Time of death
During pregnancy, childbirth or abortion 7,179 29.4% 4 0.2%
During the puerperium, up to 42 days 13,969 57.3% 51 2%
During the puerperium, from 43 days to less than 1 year 942 3.9% 2,400 93.5%
Not during pregnancy or postpartum period 427 1.8% 62 2.4%
Inconsistent reported period 176 0.7% 0 0%
Not informed or ignored 1,694 6.9% 49 1.9%
Type of maternal death
Direct obstetric maternal death 15,032 61.6% 0 0%
Indirect obstetric maternal death 8,604 35.3% 0 0%
Unspecified obstetric maternal death 747 3.1% 0 0%
Status of the death investigation
Death investigated, with summary record provided 22,152 90.8% 2,402 93.6%
Death investigated, without summary record provided 572 2.3% 63 2.5%
Death not investigated 1,663 6.8% 101 3.9%
Total 24.387 100% 2.566 100%
Source: Prepared by the authors. Brazil, 2025.
The analysis of the association between the type of death (maternal vs. late) and the sociodemographic variables revealed statistically significant results for all categories analyzed. Regarding the age group, a p-value equal to 0.00085 was identified, indicating a significant association with the type of death. The association between the type of death and the age group, considering the groups grouped as 10 to 19 years, 20 to 29 years, 30 to 39 years and 40 years or older, presented a p-value of 0.0025. The minimum expected value in the cells was 219.10, all above the critical limit of 5, which validates the test applied. Thus, there was a statistically significant association between the grouped age group and the type of death (maternal vs. late). Regarding skin color, the association with the type of death was also significant, with a minimum expected value of 5.8, which ensures the statistical validity of the test applied. Therefore, the Chi-square was considered adequate and the results reliable, indicating a statistically significant result. This finding demonstrates that the distribution of maternal and late deaths differs significantly between indigenous and white women, even considering the reduced number of cases in the indigenous population.
For the education variable, the Chi-square test resulted in a p-value, with a minimum expected value of 59.88, which confirms the robustness of the test applied and the existence of a significant association between the level of education and the type of death. Finally, the region of residence presented a highly significant association (p<10⁻⁴⁹), with a minimum expected value of 215.73, indicating a strong relationship between the place of residence and the distribution of maternal and late deaths.
Table 3. Association tests between type of death and sociodemographic variables (n=26,953). Brazil 2010-2023.
Table 3. Association tests between type of death and sociodemographic variables (n=26,953). Brazil 2010-2023.
Variable IC 95% p-valor
Age
10 to 14 years - -
15 to 19 years 0,002 - 0,027 0,057
20 to 29 years 0,012 - 0,041 <0,001
30 to 39 years 0,010 - 0,037 <0,001
40 to 49 years 0,005 - 0,018 0,008
50 to 59 years
Ignored
Skin color
White - -
Black 0,009 - 0,021 <0,001
Yellow 0,002 - 0,001 -
Brown 0,038 - 0,012 <0,001
Indigenous 0,002 - 0,012 <0,001
Ignored
Marital status
Single 0,015 - 0,034 <0,001
Married 0,017 - 0,009 <0,001
Widow 0,002 - 0,012 -
Legally separated 0,002 - 0,001 -
Other 0,002 - 0,008 -
Ignored
Education
None 0,001 - 0,007 <0,05
1 to 3 years 0,002 - 0,011 <0,05
4 to 7 years 0,006 - 0,018 <0,01
8 to 11 years 0,032 - 0,012 <0,001
12 years and over 0,004 - 0,002 -
Ignored
Region of residence
North 0,025 - 0,011 <0,001
North East 0,019 - 0,008 <0,001
Southeast - -
South 0,012 - 0,026 <0,001
Midwest 0,003 - 0,005 -
Source: Prepared by the authors. Brazil, 2025.
The comparison was performed by means of the difference in proportions, with calculation of the 95% confidence interval and the p-value, with the aim of verifying whether these proportions differ statistically between the two groups. It was observed that the majority of total maternal deaths occurred during pregnancy, childbirth or abortion (29.4%) and in the puerperium up to 42 days (57.3%), while among late maternal deaths, 93.5% occurred in the late puerperium (43 days to less than one year). This difference was statistically significant (p<0.001), with a 95% CI for the difference in proportions ranging from -0.907 to -0.887, evidencing the predominance of late deaths in the immediate post-puerperal period. In addition, categories such as direct obstetric death (61.6%) and indirect obstetric death (35.3%) appeared only among total maternal deaths, with statistically significant differences (p<0.001).
Regarding the variable “investigation status”, although most deaths in both groups were investigated with a summary provided (90.8% of total deaths and 93.6% of late deaths), there was a significant difference (difference of -2.8; 95% CI [-0.038, -0.018]; p<0.001), suggesting a higher percentage of formal investigation among late deaths. Another relevant point is that, even in categories of lower occurrence such as “inconsistent period reported” or “death not investigated”, significant differences were found between the groups. The only category with no statistical difference was “investigated without summary available” (p=0.7275).
Table 4. Association tests categorization ratios between total and late maternal deaths (n=26,953). Brazil 2010-2023.
Table 4. Association tests categorization ratios between total and late maternal deaths (n=26,953). Brazil 2010-2023.
Variable IC 95% p-valor
Time of death
During pregnancy, childbirth or abortion 0.287 - 0.299 <0.001
During the puerperium, up to 42 days 0.545 - 0.561 <0.001
During the puerperium, from 43 days to less than 1 year -0.907 - -0.887 <0.001
Not during pregnancy or postpartum period -0.013 - -0.000 0.0163
Inconsistent reported period 0.006 - 0.008 <0.001
Not informed or ignored 0.044 - 0.057 <0.001
Type of maternal death
Direct obstetric maternal death 0.610 - 0.622 <0.001
Indirect obstetric maternal death 0.347 - 0.359 <0.001
Unspecified obstetric maternal death 0.028 - 0.033 <0.001
Status of the death investigation
Death investigated, with summary record provided -0.038 - -0.018 <0.001
Death investigated, without summary record provided -0.007 - 0.005 0.7275
Death not investigated 0.021 - 0.037 <0.001
Source: Prepared by the authors. Brazil, 2025.

4. Discussion

This study analyzed national data on maternal and late maternal deaths in Brazil between 2010 and 2023. While most maternal deaths occurred within the first 42 days postpartum, over half were classified as late maternal deaths, occurring between 43 days and one year after delivery. This finding alone challenges the adequacy of current surveillance definitions for maternal death and suggests that important risk periods extend well beyond the early puerperium.
We found that women between the ages of 20 and 39 accounted for nearly 80% of all maternal deaths. However, deaths were also concentrated at the extremes of reproductive age: adolescents aged 15–19 accounted for 11.2% of deaths, and women aged 40–49 made up 8.3%. These findings reinforce earlier studies demonstrating higher risk among women over 30, particularly those over 40, where complications such as hypertensive disorders and coagulopathies are more prevalent [8,19,20].
Regarding the ethnoracial profile, the findings of this study corroborate recent literature that points to the persistence of structural racism in the production of health inequalities. Black and brown women have less access to quality obstetric care, fewer prenatal appointments, and a higher frequency of adverse outcomes, including maternal and neonatal death [8]. A study of more than 21 million live births between 2012 and 2022 found that skin color was a determining factor in adverse maternal outcomes, independent of socioeconomic factors [9].
Racial and ethnic disparities were also prominent. More than 63% of deaths occurred among women identified as brown or black, consistent with national evidence showing that Black women face nearly twice the maternal mortality risk of their White counterparts across all regions and age groups [9]. There were educational disparities noted with 39% of maternal deaths occurring among women with incomplete secondary education, compared to just 11.5% among women with a college degree. Lower educational attainment has been consistently associated with reduced access to prenatal care and delayed identification of complications [21].
Social context appeared to play a substantial role as well. Nearly half of all maternal deaths occurred among single women (48.3%). This aligns with findings from Recife, where 60% of women who died had no partner, suggesting that lack of social and emotional support may hinder health-seeking behaviors and continuity of care [9]. Another relevant finding is the association between low education and maternal death. Women with up to seven years of schooling had a higher proportion of deaths, which reinforces the role of education as a protective factor. Women with higher education tend to access health services earlier and understand the risks associated with pregnancy and the postpartum period [21].
Another study on maternal mortality showed in its results an 11.9% increase in the number of maternal deaths in Brazil and in the country’s Mortality Rate, from 52.29 to 65.13 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births. The main causes of maternal deaths were: other maternal illnesses that complicate pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium (17.1%); eclampsia (11.8%); gestational hypertension with significant proteinuria (6.2%); postpartum hemorrhage (5.8%); puerperal infection (5.1%) and premature placental abruption (4.2%). There was a higher number of maternal deaths in women with 4 to 7 years of schooling (23.8%), of mixed race/color (42.7%), with single marital status (53%) and aged 20 to 29 (41.8%). In these results, the place of death was predominantly the Hospital (91.2%). Mortality rates in Brazil point to regional inequalities, presenting a reality that requires interventions in the health area, so that there are satisfactory indicators in the maternal-child sector [31].
Souza et al, 2012 showed that in the first three-year period, in referral hospitals for high-risk pregnancies, the hospital fatality rate was 158.4/1,000,000 deliveries and, in the second, 132.5/1,000,000, and the main causes were: pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, urinary tract infection, puerperal infection, and indirect causes. In referral hospitals for low-risk pregnancies, the hospital fatality rates were: 7.2/1,000,00 and 80.0/1,000,00, and the main causes were: hemorrhages, embolisms, and anesthetic complications. 90% of deaths in the second three-year period were considered preventable and it was concluded that there are difficulties in treating obstetric complications at both low and high complexity levels of care and that the training of professionals to handle obstetric emergencies and monitoring the use of protocols at all hospital levels should be prioritized to reduce preventable maternal deaths [32].
Dias et al, 2015, point out that the Southeast and Northeast regions concentrate the highest number of maternal deaths. Of the 1,719 maternal deaths reported in 2010, 604 occurred in the Southeast region and 598 in the Northeast region. In the North, there were 192, in the South 193, and in the Central-West, 132, according to the DATASUS report [33]. They also highlight that in Brazil, direct obstetric causes account for 66.7% of maternal deaths and their main causes are: hypertensive diseases, hemorrhagic syndromes, complications of childbirth and puerperal infections, being closely related to socioeconomic factors.
The regional inequalities identified in this study also reflect historical disparities in the organization of health systems in Brazil. The higher proportion of maternal deaths in the Southeast may reflect both the larger population and better reporting. However, the increase in late deaths in the South highlights potential gaps in the continuity of postpartum care in this region. A time-series study identified a significant increase in late maternal mortality between 2015 and 2021 in the South and Northeast regions, especially in peripheral urban areas [13].
Late maternal deaths were also disproportionately high in the South region (18.4%), indicating possible deficiencies in long-term follow-up and postnatal monitoring. Previous studies have noted a sharp increase in late maternal deaths in the South during the 2020–2021 period [22]. Thus, these regional differences may also reflect the broader impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which disproportionately affected maternal health systems in Brazil. Between 2020 and 2021, Brazil reported some of the highest maternal mortality rates in the world related to COVID-19 complications, many of which occurred in the late postpartum period and were often underreported. Structural barriers to care, hospital overload, and disruptions to prenatal and postpartum services likely exacerbated existing racial, regional, and socioeconomic disparities during this time [5,23]
From a clinical perspective, 98.7% of deaths were due to direct obstetric causes. Non-classified obstetric complications (NCOP) accounted for 35% of deaths, while hypertensive disorders made up 19.6%. Hemorrhage, postpartum infections, and abortion-related complications comprised another 7.3%. These distributions are consistent with earlier findings highlighting the elevated risk of these conditions among Black, Indigenous, and older women [9,20,24,25]. However, the remarkably high proportion of deaths labeled as direct causes may reflect limitations in death certificate data and the potential underrecognition of indirect causes, such as chronic illnesses, psychiatric conditions, or substance use. In high-surveillance settings such as the United States and United Kingdom, comprehensive maternal death reviews have revealed that a substantial proportion of late maternal deaths stem from cardiovascular disease, suicide, and drug overdose [5]. These findings suggest that improved identification of indirect and late causes could further clarify the burden and timing of maternal mortality in Brazil.
Although data indicate a predominance of direct obstetric causes, it is important to highlight that maternal deaths from indirect causes, such as cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, and mental disorders, are increasing, especially in late pregnancy. International studies show that more than half of maternal deaths in the United States between 2017 and 2019 were caused by preexisting conditions exacerbated by pregnancy, including heart disease, hemorrhage, and mental health disorders, especially in the late postpartum period [23]. In Brazil, recent data reinforce this trend, indicating that indirect causes have increased proportionally in recent years, particularly among Black women and those with low levels of education [25].
Another relevant point is the underreporting of maternal deaths in the late period, which compromises surveillance and public policy development. An analysis of maternal mortality committees in the US showed that 84% of pregnancy-related deaths were preventable, implying systemic failures in care in both high- and middle-income countries [23]. In Brazil, the lack of standardization in coding causes of death, coupled with incomplete data in the SIM, limits a full understanding of the profile of late deaths and their association with social and structural determinants [11].
The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated these vulnerabilities. Brazil had one of the highest absolute numbers of COVID-19-related maternal deaths between 2020 and 2022, with the majority occurring in the late postpartum period, often outside of a hospital setting. The overload of health services, the discontinuity of prenatal care, and the shortage of obstetric and intensive care beds contributed to the increase in preventable deaths. These data reinforce the urgency of expanding maternal surveillance beyond 42 days postpartum, incorporating active monitoring up to one year after birth, as already recommended by international organizations [12,22].
In the United States, maternal mortality remains a serious public health problem, with rates significantly higher than in other high-income countries. In 2021, the country recorded 32.9 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births, with an even greater increase among Black women, who had a mortality rate three times higher than that of white women. The literature points to multifactorial causes, including racial inequalities, poverty, limited access to prenatal care, and conditions such as obesity and cardiovascular disease. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the healthcare system faced serious challenges that negatively impacted obstetric care, contributing to the increase in maternal deaths, especially late deaths [26].
In Canada, despite having a well-structured public health system, there are significant variations in maternal mortality rates between provinces and population groups. The national rate is estimated to range from 8 to 11 deaths per 100,000 live births. Indigenous women and those living in remote areas face greater risks due to limited access to specialized services and ongoing monitoring. Studies indicate that a substantial proportion of maternal deaths are attributed to preventable causes, such as hemorrhage and hypertensive conditions, in addition to underestimation of postpartum mental health problems [27].
Spain maintains one of the lowest maternal mortality rates in the world, with rates below 4 deaths per 100,000 live births in recent years. The robust healthcare system, the high percentage of hospital births attended by specialized professionals, and qualified prenatal care are factors that explain these positive indicators. However, recent studies indicate that migrant women have up to three times the risk of maternal death than Spanish women, mainly due to language barriers, institutional barriers, and structural racism [28].
Italy also has low maternal mortality rates (approximately 2 to 4 per 100,000 live births), making it a benchmark for safe obstetric care. However, analyses by maternal death review committees reveal that nearly half of deaths could be prevented with improvements in early recognition of complications and improved care response. Furthermore, there is growing concern about deaths associated with indirect causes, such as cardiovascular disease, which are increasing among older women and those with pre-existing comorbidities [29].
Portugal, in turn, maintains a maternal mortality rate of less than 10 per 100,000 live births. The country presents positive indicators, attributed to a national policy focused on women’s health and high access to primary care. Even so, recent research indicates the need for improved postpartum care, especially in socially vulnerable contexts and among foreign women. The data also show that approximately 40% of deaths could be preventable, which indicates opportunities for improving surveillance and response protocols for obstetric emergencies [30].
Although the deaths of women during the pregnancy-puerperal cycle are associated with the unsatisfactory provision of health care and reflect the inadequate quality of care, it is an important indicator of poverty, social inequality, coverage and quality of care for the health needs of the population [34].
Particularly important is the importance of paying special attention to monitoring women during the late postpartum period, given the potential positive impact on preventing these preventable deaths. Therefore, it is recommended that future research incorporate an in-depth analysis of the underlying causes of late maternal mortality, in addition to interventions in professional training and improving the quality of health services [13].
Despite the robust national scope, this study has several limitations. The use of secondary data from the SIM, while comprehensive, is susceptible to underreporting, missing data, and delays in record consolidation. Key fields such as time of death relative to the pregnancy and sociodemographic variables like education and marital status were inconsistently completed, which may limit the precision of our classification. Moreover, the reliance on death certificate coding may obscure indirect causes of death, particularly when chronic conditions aggravated by pregnancy are underrecognized. The absence of clinical variables such as prenatal visit counts, delivery type, and access to specialized care also limits our ability to fully understand the care trajectories leading to maternal death.
Nevertheless, our findings provide strong support for revisiting Brazil’s postpartum surveillance frameworks. Recognizing and recording late maternal deaths, particularly among socially marginalized populations, could help uncover system-level failures that remain invisible under current reporting standards. Extending the monitoring window to one year postpartum would align Brazil with WHO recommendations and international best practices and would generate actionable data to guide interventions. This study also highlights the need for standardized, complete, and accurate documentation of maternal deaths, particularly regarding cause, timing, and social determinants.

5. Conclusions

This study showed that maternal and late maternal deaths in Brazil present distinct and unequal patterns in terms of sociodemographic, regional, and clinical factors. The data reveal that maternal mortality in Brazil continues to be a reflection of structural inequalities, race, education, social support, region, age and class. These disparities were further intensified during the COVID-19 pandemic, which strained health systems and disproportionately affected vulnerable populations. Addressing these challenges will require both clinical and policy-level interventions. Expanding postpartum surveillance beyond the first 42 days is an important step not only to safeguard maternal health, but also to improve data accuracy and policy response. Targeted efforts are needed to monitor women at the extremes of reproductive age, promote racial equity through anti-racist training of health professionals, and implement social policies that improve education, income, and access to healthcare.
In addition, the development and adoption of extended maternal care protocols, particularly those addressing hypertensive conditions, mental health, and psychosocial support, should be prioritized to reduce preventable late deaths. Public policies aimed at reducing maternal mortality must confront these structural inequities and invest in continuous postpartum care throughout the first year after birth, with focused attention on the most at-risk populations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Santos GG. Methodology: Santos GG, Maposa S and Muriuki A. Formal analysis: Santos GG, Parascandalo RP, Maposa S and Muriuki A. Investigation: Santos GG, Mollard E, Parascandalo RP, Maposa S, Muriuki A, Mouta RJO, Zihlmann KF, Ichikawa CRF, Lima CF, Reis CHR, Guerra MJJ, Carvalho JMN, Dias ACRF, Bettencourt MLS, Oliveira C, Renó BF, Cerqueira ET and Farias KRA. Validation: Santos GG. Visualization: Santos GG. Writing—original draft preparation: Santos GG, Mollard E, Parascandalo RP, Maposa S, Muriuki A, Mouta RJO, Zihlmann KF, Ichikawa CRF, Lima CF, Reis CHR, Guerra MJJ, Carvalho JMN, Dias ACRF, Bettencourt MLS, Oliveira C, Renó BF, Cerqueira ET and Farias KRA. Writing—review and editing: Santos GG, Mollard E, Parascandalo RP, Maposa S, Muriuki A, Mouta RJO, Zihlmann KF, Ichikawa CRF, Lima CF, Reis CHR, Guerra MJJ, Carvalho JMN, Dias ACRF, Bettencourt MLS, Oliveira C, Renó BF, Cerqueira ET and Farias KRA. Supervision: Santos GG. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Additional questions can be directed to the corresponding author(s)

Public Involvement Statement

No public involvement in any aspect of this research

Guidelines and Standards Statement

This manuscript was drafted against the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) [15,16]

Use of Artificial Intelligence

Not applicable

Acknowledgments

Not applicable

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest

Abbreviations

ICD-10 - Classification of Diseases – 10th Revision
DATASUS - Departamento de Informática do Sistema Único de Saúde
GBD - Global Burden of Disease
MMR - Maternal Mortality Ratio
SIM - Sistema de Informação sobre Mortalidade
SINASC - Sistema de Informação sobre Nascidos Vivos
STROBE - Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology
WHO - World Health Organization

References

  1. National Obstetric Information System, NOIS. (2010). Annual Report 2010. Malta: Department of Health Information and Research.
  2. National Obstetric Information System, NOIS. (2023). Annual Report 2023. Malta: Department of Health Information and Research.
  3. World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems: 10th revision (ICD-10). 2016.
  4. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller AB, Daniels J, Gülmezoglu AM, Temmerman M, Alkema L. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. The Lancet global health. 2014 Jun 1;2(6):e323-33.
  5. Knight M, Bunch K, Tuffnell D, Jayakody H, Shakespeare J, Kotnis R, Kenyon S, Kurinczuk J. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care-Lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2014-16.
  6. Firoz T, Chou D, von Dadelszen P, Agrawal P, Vanderkruik R, Tunçalp Ö, et al. Measuring maternal health: focus on maternal morbidity. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91(10):794–796.
  7. Petersen EE, Davis NL, Goodman D, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in pregnancy-related deaths—United States, 2007–2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(35):762–765.
  8. Rebouças P, Paixão ES, Ramos D, Pescarini J, Pinto-Junior EP, Falcão IR, Ichihara MY, Sena S, Veiga R, Ribeiro R, Rodrigues LC, Barreto ML, Goes EF. Ethno-racial inequalities on adverse birth and neonatal outcomes: a nationwide, retrospective cohort study of 21 million Brazilian newborns. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Jul 5;37:100833. [CrossRef]
  9. Silva AD, Guida JPS, Santos DS, Santiago SM, Surita FG. Racial disparities and maternal mortality in Brazil: findings from a national database. Rev Saude Publica. 2024 Jul 5;58:25. [CrossRef]
  10. Leal LF, Malta DC, Souza MFM, Vasconcelos AMN, Teixeira RA, Veloso GA, Lansky S, Ribeiro ALP, França GVA, Naghavi M. Maternal Mortality in Brazil, 1990 to 2019: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2022 Jan 28;55(suppl 1):e0279.
  11. Ferreira MES, Coutinho RZ, Queiroz BL. Maternal morbidity and mortality in Brazil and the urgency of a national surveillance system for maternal near miss. Cad Saude Publica. 2023 Aug 7;39(8):e00013923.
  12. Tenorio DS, de Matos Brasil AG, Nogueira BG, Rolim Lima NN, Araújo JEB, Rolim Neto ML. High maternal mortality rates in Brazil: Inequalities and the struggle for justice. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Oct;14:100343.
  13. Borgonove KCA, Lansky S, Soares VMN, Matozinhos FP, Martins EF, Silva RAR, Souza KV. Time series analysis: trend in late maternal mortality in Brazil, 2010-2019. Cad Saude Publica. 2024 Aug 26;40(7):e00168223.
  14. Oliveira IVG, Maranhão TA, Sousa GJB, Silva TL, Rocha MIF, Frota MMCD, Araujo TKA, Pereira MLD. Maternal mortality in Northeast Brazil 2009-2019: spatial distribution, trend and associated factors. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2023 Oct 30;32(3):e2022973.
  15. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M; STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology. 2007 Nov;18(6):805-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577511.
  16. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008.
  17. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2024, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
  18. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução nº 510, de 7 de abril de 2016. Brasília. https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/cns/2016/res0510_07_04_2016.html.
  19. Montalmant KE, Ettinger AK. The Racial Disparities in Maternal Mortality and Impact of Structural Racism and Implicit Racial Bias on Pregnant Black Women: A Review of the Literature. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Dec;11(6):3658-3677. [CrossRef]
  20. Lima Figueiredo ER, do Socorro Carvalho Miranda C, Viana Campos AC, de Campos Gomes F, Câmara Rodrigues CN, de Melo-Neto JS. Influence of sociodemographic and obstetric factors on maternal mortality in Brazil from 2011 to 2021. BMC Womens Health. 2024 Feb 1;24(1):84. [CrossRef]
  21. da Silva Bueno LA, Ribeiro MAL, Martins CB, de Abreu LC, de Almeida AD Jr, Correa JA. Describing Trends in Maternal Mortality in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, from 2009 to 2019. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 12;11(18):2522. [CrossRef]
  22. Cambou MC, David H, Moucheraud C, Nielsen-Saines K, Comulada WS, Macinko J. Time series analysis of comprehensive maternal deaths in Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 14;14(1):23960. [CrossRef]
  23. Trost S, Beauregard J, Chandra G, Njie F, Berry J, Harvey A, Goodman DA. Pregnancy-related deaths: data from maternal mortality review committees in 36 US states, 2017–2019. Education. 2022 Sep 19;45(10):1-0.
  24. Dorcély DF, Surita FG, Costa ML, de Siqueira Guida JP. Maternal deaths due to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Brazil from 2012 until 2023: a cross-sectional populational-based study. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2025 Dec;44(1):2492094. [CrossRef]
  25. Siqueira GL, de Oliveira Fontes GR, da Silva AG, Gomes CRG, Ferreira FM, de Siqueira Guida JP, Martins EF, Ciaravolo LCF, Gabrielloni MC, Brito MCDS, Matozinhos FP, da Silva TPR. The effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on the maternal mortality rate and the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goal in Brazil. BMC Public Health. 2025 May 30;25(1):2005. [CrossRef]
  26. Petersen EE, Davis NL, Goodman D, Cox S, Syverson C, Seed K, Shapiro-Mendoza C, Callaghan WM, Barfield W. Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Pregnancy-Related Deaths - United States, 2007-2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Sep 6;68(35):762-765.
  27. Allen VM, Campbell M, Carson G, Fraser W, Liston RM, Walker M, Barrett J. Maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity surveillance in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010 Dec;32(12):1140-1146.
  28. García-Tizón Larroca S, Arévalo-Serrano J, Ruiz Minaya M, Paya Martinez P, Perez Fernandez Pacheco R, Lizarraga Bonelli S, De Leon Luis J. Maternal mortality trends in Spain during the 2000-2018 period: the role of maternal origin. BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 17;22(1):337.
  29. Donati S, Maraschini A, Lega I, D’Aloja P, Buoncristiano M, Manno V; Regional Maternal Mortality Working Group. Maternal mortality in Italy: Results and perspectives of record-linkage analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Nov;97(11):1317-1324.
  30. Experiences of birth in Portugal (2012-2015). Survey of Women’s experience of birth. February 2019.
  31. Ferraz L, Bordignon, M. Mortalidade materna no Brasil: Uma realidade que precisa melhorar. Revista Baiana de Saúde Pública. V.36,n. 2, p.527-538.br/jun.2012.
  32. Soares VMN, Souza KV, Azevedo EMM, Possebon CR, Marques FF. Causas de mortalidade materna segundo níveis de complexidade hospitalar. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia 2013;34(12):536-43.
  33. Dias JMG, Oliveira APS de, Cipolotti R, Monteiro BKS, Pereira R de. Mortalidade Materna. Rev. Med Minas Gerais 2015;25(2):173-179.
  34. Borgonove KCA. O silêncio de vidas não contadas [recursos eletrônicos]]:mortalidade materna tardia no Brasil 2010-2019.- Belo Horizonte:2021.97 f.:il.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated