Submitted:
03 April 2026
Posted:
03 April 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- − Grinding: An MSHL-7 (40 ML) laboratory ball mill (Mekhanobr-tekhnika).
- − Flotation: A Vektis 3-liter pneumo-mechanical flotation machine.
- − Monitoring: Hanna HI3230B and HI1230B electrodes were used to monitor pH, ORP, and temperature.
- − Grinding kinetics: Intervals of 0, 3, 5, 10, and 15 minutes;
- − Rougher flotation: 5 minutes;
- − Reagent dosages: Sodium sulfide (Na2S) at 400 g/t; potassium butyl xanthate (PBX) at 50 g/t; and Methyl Isobutyl Carbinol (MIBC) as a frother at 20 g/t;
- − Process Monitoring: pH, ORP, and temperature readings were recorded at three critical stages: immediately after grinding, before collector addition, and after collector addition;
- − Water Quality: All tests were conducted using process water of a standardized chemical composition.
3. Results
- -
- maximum Recovery Plateau: The highest copper recovery values (ranging from 16.26% to 15.56%) were achieved at a grinding fineness of 77-81% (-0.045 mm). Enrichment Efficiency: The Hancock-Luyken enrichment efficiency at these fineness levels was recorded as 12.56% (for 77% passing) and 12.70% (for 81% passing).
- -
- Marginal Gains: The negligible difference of only 0.14% between these efficiency rates indicates that further grinding beyond 77% - in the absence of chemical activation- does not lead to any significant metallurgical improvement.
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kursunoglu, Sait. A Review on the Recovery of Critical Metals from Mine and Mineral Processing Tailings: Recent Advances. Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy 2025, 11, 2023–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cotrina-Teatino, Marco Antonio; Marquina-Araujo, Jairo Jhonatan; Avalos-Murga, John Anthony; Carrion-Villacorta, Fabricio Leonardo. Flotation of mine tailings: A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2025, Volume 13(Issue 2), 116136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cacciuttolo, Carlos; Atencio, Edison. Past, Present, and Future of Copper Mine Tailings Governance in Chile (1905–2022): A Review in One of the Leading Mining Countries in the World. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 13060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kinnunen, P.; Karhu, M.; Yli-Rantala, E.; Kivikytö-Reponen, P.; Mäkinen, J. A review of circular economy strategies for mine tailings. Cleaner Engineering and Technology 2022, 8, 100499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dadzie, R.A.; Zanin, M.; Skinner, W.; Addai-Mensah, J.; Asamoah, R.; Abaka-Wood, G.B. Reprocessing of Sulphide Flotation Tailings for Copper Recovery: Characterisation. Minerals 2025, 15, 649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Araujo, Francisco S. M.; Llano, Isabella Taborda; Nunes, Everton Barbosa; Santos, Rafael M. Recycling and Reuse of Mine Tailings: A Review of Advancements and Their Implications. Preprints Posted. 12 August 2022. [CrossRef]
- Chen, Xumeng; Peng, Yongjun; Bradshaw, Dee. Effect of regrinding conditions on pyrite flotation in the presence of copper ions. // International Journal of Mineral Processing Volume 2013, Volume 125, Pages 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, Xiaoling; Zhan, Yan; Tian, Xiang. Recent Advances in Treatment Technologies and Resource Utilization of Mine Tailings in Hunan Province, China. Processes 2025, 13, 2957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amerigo Resources Ltd. Management’s Discussion and Analysis For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025. Available online: https://www.amerigoresources.com.
- Muflih Hidayat. 18 November 2025. Available online: ://www.drdgold.com.
- Duczmal-Czernikiewicz, Agata; Baibatsha, Adilkhan; Bekbotayeva, Alma; Omarova, Gulnara; Baisalova, Akmaral. Ore Minerals and Metal Distribution in Tailings of Sediment-Hosted Stratiform Copper Deposits from Poland and Kazakhstan. Minerals 2021, 11, 752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mambetalieva, A.R.; Makasheva, G.K.; Tusupbekova, T.Sh.; Kaliaskar, S.K.; Sagatbek, S. The effect of ultrafine grinding on the technological parameters of the enrichment of dump tailings. In Vestnik KazUTB; 2024; Volume Р, pp. 466–476. [Google Scholar]
- Baibatsha, A.; Bekbotayeva, A.; Kembayev, M.; et al. Mineralogy and processing of accumulated tailings of Kazakhstan beneficiation factories as technogenic ores. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2023, 2023; pp. 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakalarz, Alicja; Duchnowska, Magdalena; Luszczkiewicz, Andrzej. Influence of liberation of sulphide minerals on flotation of sedimentary copper ore. // EDP Sciences 2017, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trifunović, V.; Dimitrijević, M.; Pavlović, P.; et al. Flotation Tailings from Cu–Au Mining (Bor, Serbia) as a Source of Critical Elements. Minerals 2024, №14(9), Р. 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Lu, L.; Li, C. Research on the separation of malachite from quartz with S-carboxymethyl-O,O′-dibutyl dithiophosphate chelating collector and its insights into flotation mechanism. Powder Technology 2020, Р.374–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, J.; Seo, J.; Kim, S.B.; Kim, W. Flotation Behavior of Malachite Using Hydrophobic Talc Nanoparticles as Collectors. Minerals 2020, №10(9), Р.1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, B.; Lu, X.; Liu, R.; et al. Flotation Performance and Adsorption Mechanism of a Novel Chelating Collector for Azurite. Minerals 2022, №12(4), Р.1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mambetaliyeva, A.; Tussupbekova, T.; Sabirova, L.; Makasheva, G.; Rysbekov, K.; Barmenshinova, M. Study of Oxidative–Reductive Potential Changes in the Enrichment of Oxidized Polymetallic Ores. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 6091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oserov, T. Mechanochemical synthesis of a sulfidizer for processing copper ores // Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD). Almaty. 2020, p. 142, Available online: official.satbayev.university official.satbayev.university.
- Moimane, T.; Peng, Y. Sulphidisation of oxides and oxidised sulphides and adsorption of thiol collectors on the sulphidised products-a critical review // Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. July 2022, Volume 305, p. 102697, Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0001868622000999?via%3Dihub.
- Smaylov, B. Development of a method of enrichability assessment and modeling of flotation schemes for processing of hard-to-enrich lead-zinc ores. Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Technical Sciences; Moscow, 2018. Available online: xn--80apgmbdfl.xn--p1ai.





| Element | Content (wt. %) |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0.17 |
| Silver (Ag), g/t | 1.19 |
| Gold (Au), g/t | < LOD |
| Zinc (Zn) | 0.28 |
| Lead (Pb), % | 0.09 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 5.37 |
| Total Sulfur (S), % | 1.03 |
| Sulfide Sulfur, % | 1.00 |
| Arsenic (As), % | 0.015 |
| Antimony (Sb), % | 0.003 |
| Cadmium (Cd), % | 0.0001 |
| Molybdenum (Mo), % | 0.005 |
| Tellurium (Te), % | 0.0003 |
| Silicon dioxide, % | 58.06 |
| Aluminum oxide, % | 17.47 |
| Calcium oxide, % | 4.82 |
| Magnesium oxide, % | 1.34 |
| Potassium oxide, % | 2.89 |
| Selenium (Se), % | < LOD |
| Tin (Sn), % | < LOD |
| Bismuth (Bi), % | < LOD |
| Copper Phase / Mineral Form | Content, % (absolute) |
Distribution, % (relative) |
| Sulfide Minerals, including.: | 0.078 | 46.16 |
| Secondary sulfides | 0.026 | 15.39 |
| Primary sulfides | 0.052 | 30.77 |
| Oxidized Minerals | 0.092 | 53.84 |
| including: Chrysocolla | 0.029 | 17.08 |
| Total Copper | 0.170 | 100.0 |
| Size fraction, mm | Weight, % | Grade, %, g/t* | Distribution, % | ||||
| Cu | Ag* | S | Cu | Ag | S | ||
| -0.5+0.2 | 8.15 | 0.196 | 1.472 | 1.11 | 9.27 | 10.08 | 8.80 |
| -0.2+0.1 | 13.24 | 0.176 | 1.106 | 1.02 | 13.53 | 12.31 | 13.14 |
| -0.1+0.071 | 5.19 | 0.201 | 1.882 | 1.15 | 6.06 | 8.21 | 5.81 |
| -0.071+0.045 | 21.76 | 0.162 | 1.196 | 0.92 | 20.46 | 21.87 | 19.48 |
| -0.045+0 | 51.66 | 0.169 | 1.095 | 1.05 | 50.68 | 47.54 | 52.77 |
| Feed | 100.0 | 0.17 | 1.19 | 1.03 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Size fraction (μm) | Weight, % | Cu Grade, % | Distribution, % |
| +71 | 26.08 | 0.147 | 22.55 |
| -71+59.1 | 13.42 | 0.156 | 12.31 |
| -59.1+45.4 | 9.06 | 0.163 | 8.69 |
| -45.4+32.7 | 13.61 | 0.103 | 8.24 |
| -32.7+22.22 | 4.06 | 0.156 | 3.73 |
| -22.22+11.11 | 6.24 | 0.115 | 4.22 |
| -11.11+8.4 | 0.68 | 0.078 | 0.31 |
| -8.4+0 | 26.85 | 0.253 | 39.95 |
| Total (Feed) | 100.0 | 0.17 | 100.0 |
| Size (mm) | Initial (0 min) | ||||||
| Ball Mill (Rotary Axis) | Ultra-Fine Grinding (UFG) | ||||||
| 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 10 | 20 | |
| 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8.4 | 26.85 | 32.14 | 38.59 | 44.75 | 47.03 | 43.97 | 65.44 |
| 11.11 | 27.53 | 44.23 | 47.85 | 51.04 | 54.95 | 50.02 | 77.49 |
| 22.22 | 33.77 | 54.81 | 58.72 | 64.99 | 70.21 | 72.70 | 93.23 |
| 32.7 | 37.83 | 58.05 | 63.67 | 71.64 | 79.36 | 85.90 | 98.29 |
| 45.4 | 51.44 | 65.50 | 69.95 | 77.16 | 84.57 | 96.26 | 100.00 |
| 59.1 | 60.50 | 75.05 | 79.34 | 83.82 | 88.71 | 99.52 | 100.00 |
| 71 | 73.92 | 81.26 | 87.06 | 94.06 | 96.30 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| -0.045 mm content (%) | Na2S dosage, g/t | Yield, % | Concentrate grade, % | Recovery, % | Enrichment Efficiency, % |
| 51 (initial) | 0 | 3.05 | 0.911 | 13.74 | 10.71 |
| 65 | 0 | 3.55 | 0.858 | 14.93 | 11.40 |
| 70 | 0 | 3.56 | 0.879 | 15.05 | 11.52 |
| 77 | 0 | 3.73 | 0.868 | 16.26 | 12.56 |
| 81 | 0 | 2.89 | 1.14 | 15.56 | 12.70 |
| 51 (initial) | 400 | 4.18 | 0.823 | 17.54 | 13.38 |
| 65 | 400 | 4.28 | 1.37 | 29.41 | 25.19 |
| 70 | 400 | 4.11 | 1.64 | 33.93 | 29.88 |
| 77 | 400 | 5.27 | 1.41 | 36.37 | 31.17 |
| 81 | 400 | 5.52 | 1.29 | 35.80 | 30.34 |
| 90 | 400 | 16.98 | 0.622 | 50.43 | 33.52 |
| 100 | 400 | 17.28 | 0.634 | 51.47 | 34.26 |
| -0.045 mm Content (%) | рН | ORP | temperature, °С | Note | ||||||
| After grinding | Before Xanthate | After Xanthate | After grinding | Before Xanthate | After Xanthate | After grinding | Before Xanthate | After Xanthate | ||
| 56 (initial) | 7,77 | 7,77 | 7,8 | 186 | 186 | 182 | 15,71 | 15,71 | 15,71 | without Na2S |
| 65 | 7,54 | 7,52 | 7,56 | 44 | 38 | 38 | 18,4 | 18,2 | 18,1 | without Na2S |
| 70 | 7,5 | 7,51 | 7,48 | -3 | -8 | -10 | 19,4 | 19,4 | 19,4 | without Na2S |
| 77 | 7,52 | 7,53 | 7,54 | -37 | -42 | -50 | 20,4 | 20,5 | 20,5 | without Na2S |
| 81 | 7,49 | 7,49 | 7,52 | -58 | -70 | -140 | 21 | 21 | 21 | without Na2S |
| 56 (initial) | 7,54 | 7,52 | 8,66 | 186 | 186 | -150 | 18,4 | 18,2 | 18,1 | with Na2S |
| 65 | 7,5 | 7,51 | 8,62 | 44 | 38 | -150 | 19,4 | 19,4 | 19,4 | with Na2S |
| 70 | 7,52 | 7,53 | 8,64 | -3 | -8 | -150 | 20,4 | 20,5 | 20,5 | with Na2S |
| 77 | 7,49 | 7,49 | 8,69 | -37 | -42 | -150 | 21 | 21 | 21 | with Na2S |
| 81 | 7,49 | 7,49 | 8,73 | -58 | -70 | -140 | 21 | 21 | 21 | with Na2S |
| 90 | 7,7 | 7,7 | 8,71 | 146 | 126 | -150 | 21 | 21 | 21 | with Na2S |
| 100 | 7,6 | 7,67 | 8,72 | 129 | 112 | -150 | 22 | 22 | 21 | with Na2S |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.