Submitted:
01 April 2026
Posted:
03 April 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Preparating of Coating
| Gun Movement Speed (mm/s) | Oxygen (l/min) | Kerosene (l/h) |
Powder Feed Rate (g/min) | Powder Feed Gas (l/min) | Spraying Distance (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 583 | 944 | 25.5 | 92 | Nitrogen, 9.5 | 370 |
2.2. Microstructure Characterization
2.3. Mechanical and Tribological Properties
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Microstructure and Phase Composition of the (WC–Co+Ni)/Ductile Cast Iron System
3.2. Mechanical Characteristics of (WC-Co+N)i/Ductile Cast Iron System
3.3. Tribological Characteristics of (WC-Co+Ni)/Ductile Cast Iron System
4. Conclusions
- The composite (WC–Co+Ni) coating deposited using the HVOF technique exhibits a dense, low-porosity microstructure with a well-developed and defect-free interface between the coating and the ductile cast iron substrate. The coating is characterized by a heterogeneous structure consisting of a dominant WC phase embedded in a cobalt-based metallic matrix, additionally modified by nickel in the form of elongated, plastically deformed particles as well as partially molten, flattened Ni particles.
- Phase analysis confirms that nickel is partially dissolved in the Co-based binder and partially retained as a distinct metallic phase, which enhances the structural heterogeneity of the coating. This dual nature of Ni contributes to improved microstructural cohesion and promotes effective stress redistribution within the composite structure. As a result, the coating demonstrates increased resistance to crack initiation and propagation, as well as stable load-bearing behavior without signs of interfacial delamination.
- The modification of the coating composition through the addition of nickel significantly improves its mechanical and tribological performance. The presence of Ni reduces stress concentration in the carbide–matrix system, limits carbide pull-out, and enhances plastic deformation capability of the metallic matrix, which together contribute to improved structural integrity and damage tolerance of the coating.
- The tribological behavior of the (WC–Co+Ni) coating is primarily governed by the integrity of the carbide–matrix system, where hard WC particles provide wear resistance, while the Co-based matrix ensures load transfer and cohesion. Nickel plays a key role in stabilizing wear mechanisms by promoting controlled material removal and reducing the severity of abrasive interactions.
- (WC–Co+Ni) coatings deposited on ductile cast iron substrates by the HVOF process represent an effective solution for applications requiring high load-bearing capacity, enhanced wear resistance, and improved structural stability under mechanical loading. The synergistic interaction between hard WC particles, the Co-based binder, and nickel modification ensures balanced mechanical performance and reliable operational behavior in demanding service conditions.
Author Contributions
Funding
References
- Stewart, D.A.; Shipway, P.H.; McCartney, D.G. Microstructural evolution in HVOF sprayed WC–Co Coatings. Acta Mater. 2000, 48, 1593–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shipway, P.H.; Hogg, J.J. Abrasive wear behaviour of HVOF sprayed WC–Co coatings. Wear. 2005, 259, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murthy, J.K.N.; Venkataraman, B. Abrasive wear behaviour of WC–CoCr coatings deposited by HVOF spraying. Surf.& Coat. Technol. 2006, 200, 2642–2652. [Google Scholar]
- Guilemany, J.M.; Fernández, J.; Miguel, J.M. Tribological behaviour of WC–Co coatings. Tribol. Interna. 2002, 35, 567–575. [Google Scholar]
- Suhonen, T.; Varis, T.; Turunen, E. Tribology of HVOF and HVAF sprayed WC-10Co4Cr coatings. Surf.& Coat. Technol. 2015, 265, 125–144. [Google Scholar]
- Lima, R.S.; Marple, B.R. Nanostructured WC–Co coatings produced by thermal spraying. J. Thermal Spray Technol. 2007, 16, 40–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chivavibul, P.; Watanabe, M.; Kuroda, S. Microstructure and mechanical properties of WC–Co coatings deposited by HVOF spraying. Surf.& Coat. Technol. 2007, 202, 509–521. [Google Scholar]
- Sampath, S.; Wayne, S.F. Processing–structure relationships in thermal spray coatings. J. Thermal Spray Technol. 1994, 3, 307–317. [Google Scholar]
- Li, C.J.; Yang, H. Formation mechanisms of HVOF sprayed WC–Co coatings. Mater.& Manufact. Process. 1999, 14, 383–394. [Google Scholar]
- Kleis, I.; Berger, L.-M.; Zieris, R.; Jaworski, A. Microstructure and properties of HVOF-sprayed chromium alloyed WC–Co and WC–Ni coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2008, 202, 4417–4421. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, A.S.Y.N.; Kamdi, Z.; Ainun, R.; Hussin, R.; Siti Aida, I. Tungsten carbide–nickel (WC–Ni) coating as potential wear and corrosion protection for metal. Mater. Sci. Forum. 2020, 1010, 286–291. [Google Scholar]
- Harish, U.; Mruthunjaya, M.; Chakule, R. R.; Aswar, S. J.; Durga Prasad, C.; Balaji, S.; Nandakumar, M. B.; Jayasheel Kumar, K. A.; Aden, Adem Abdirkadir. Effect of cobalt variation on microstructural and erosion performance of HVOF-sprayed WC–Co–Cr–Ni hard-faced coatings. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 2025, 20, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhao, Z.; Hou, C.; Liu, X.; Song, X. Wear and corrosion resistant HVOF-sprayed WC-xCr₃C₂-8Co-6Ni coatings produced from pre-alloyed powder. Surf.& Coat. Technol. 2023, 473, 129989. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.-Z.; Wang, H.-B.; Liu, X.-M; Yang, T.; Song, X.-Y. Grain growth inhibitor on the WC–Co cemented carbide coating. J. Inorg. Mater. 2017, 32(8), 813–818. [Google Scholar]
- Yao, J.; Liu, F.; Tan, L.; Huang, L.; Liu, Y. Decarburization control and performance enhancement: optimizing HVOF sprayed submicron WC-12Co coating with additives. Int. J. Refract. Metals Hard Mater. 2024, 124, 106846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Z.-W.; Chen, Q.-Y.; Bai, X.-B.; Yang, C.; Ji, G.-C.; Zhang, M.-X.; Wang, H.-T.; Yao, H.-L.; Wang, F. Microstructure, phase constitution and mechanical properties of WC-Cr₃C₂-CoNiLa coatings fabricated by using HVOF spraying core-shell powder. Int. J. Refract. Metals Hard Mater. 2022, 106, 106862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pawlowski, J. The Science and Engineering of Thermal Spray Coatings, 2nd ed.; Wiley: Chichester, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Murthy, H.; Venkataraman, B. Sliding wear behavior of HVOF sprayed WC–Co coatings. Wear. 2001, 249, 592–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matthews, S.; James, B. Review of thermal spray coatings for protection against wear. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2009, 203, 1086–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, T.; McCartney, A.; Shipway, P.; Zhang, D. A review of HVOF thermal sprayed coatings for wear resistance. J. Therm. Spray Technol. 2007, 16, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Babu, M.; Basu, B.; Sundararajan, G. Processing–microstructure–wear relationship in WC–Co coatings. Acta Material. 2008, 56, 5012–5026. [Google Scholar]
- Myalska, H.; Moskal, G. Microstructure of WC-Co coatings produced by HVOF spraying. Solid State Phenom. 2015, 226, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Ji, G.; Chen, Q. Microstructure characterization and abrasive wear performance of HVOF sprayed WC-Co coatings. Advanced Mater. Research. 2011, 189–193, 707–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mateen, A.; Khalid, F.A.; Khan, T.I. Wear behaviour of HVOF sprayed WC-Co coatings. Advanced Mater. Research. 2011, 326, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suhonen, T.; Varis, T.; Turunen, E. Effect of microstructure on mechanical properties of HVOF sprayed WC-CoCr coatings. Tribologia – Finnish Journal of Tribology. 2009, 28, 14–28. [Google Scholar]
- Żórawski, W.; et al. Microstructure and tribological properties of HVOF-sprayed nanostructured WC-12Co coatings. Coatings 2024, 14, 752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mruthunjaya, M.; Parashivamurthy, K.I. Microstructural study and tribological behavior of WC-Co coatings produced by HVOF. Interna. J. Mechan. Engin.& Technol. 2014, 5, 132–139. [Google Scholar]
- S. Lay, S.; S. Hamar-Thibault, S.; G. Béranger, G. VC- and Cr₃C₂-doped WC–NbC–Co hardmetals. J. Alloys and Compoun. 2008, 457(1–2), 263–267. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, C.; Peng, Y.; Ruan, J.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, R.; Du, Y. Influence of Cr₃C₂ and VC Content on WC Grain Size, WC Shape and Mechanical Properties of WC–6 wt.% Co Cemented Carbides. Materials 2021, 14(6), 1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; et al. Influence of VC and Cr₃C₂ as grain growth inhibitors on WC–Al₂O₃ composites prepared by hot press sintering. Internat. J. Refrac. Metals & Hard Mater. 2014, 43, 211–217. [Google Scholar]
- Lima, R.S.; Marple, B.R. Thermal spray coatings engineered from nanostructured ceramic agglomerated powders for structural, thermal barrier and biomedical applications: A review. J. Thermal Spray Technol. 2007, 16, 40–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, D.; Zhang, B.; Jia, Ch.; Gao, F.; Yu, Y.; Chu, K.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, X.; Liang, X. Influence of carbide grain size and crystal characteristics on the microstructure and mechanical properties of HVOF-sprayed WC–CoCr coatings. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2017, 69, 138–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Hosson, A.R.; Budinski, K.G. Tribology of WC–Co coatings: role of tribo-oxidation and formation of protective tribofilms. Surf.& Coat. Technol. 2006, 201, 203–211. [Google Scholar]
- Strecker, A.; Salzberger, U.; Mayer, J. Specimen preparation for transmission electron microscopy: reliable method for cross-sections and brittle materials. Prakt. Metallogr. 1993, 30, 482–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anstis, G.R.; Chantikul, P.; Lawn, B.R.; Marshall, D.B. A critical evaluation of indentation techniques for measuring fracture toughness: I, Direct crack measurements. J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 1981, 64, 533–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 27307:2015 Thermal spraying — Evaluation of adhesion/cohesion of thermal sprayed ceramic coatings by transverse scratch testing; ISO International Standards: 2015.
- Leyland, A.; Matthews, A. On the significance of the H/E ratio in wear control: a nanocomposite coating approach to optimised tribological behaviour. Wear 2000, 246, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]














| Measuring Line | Region | HIT [GPa] | EIT [GPa] |
Average HIT [GPa] | Average EIT [GPa] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
I |
Matrix (top) |
13.28 |
288.83 |
10.05±5.38 |
244.78±47.31 |
| 13.03 | 295.27 | ||||
| 3.83 | 150.23 | ||||
|
II |
Matrix (center) |
11.57 7.83 8.76 |
266.13 250.58 241.38 |
9.39±1.95 |
252.69±12.51 |
|
III |
10.52 18.21 |
238.69 332.52 |
14.23±3.85 |
290.99±47.85 |
|
| 13.95 | 301.78 | ||||
|
IV |
Matrix (bottom) |
6.30 14.01 14.46 |
228.78 294.60 280.93 |
11.59±4.59 |
268.09±34.74 |
|
V |
Interface |
9.28 16.76 5.22 |
270.19 325.85 211.88 |
10.42±5.85 |
269.31±56.97 |
| Measuring Line |
Average HIT [GPa] | Average EIT [GPa] | H/E | H³/E² |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I (top) | 10.05 | 244.78 | 0.041 | 0.017 |
| II (center) | 9.36 | 252.69 | 0.037 | 0.013 |
| III (center) | 14.23 | 290.99 | 0.049 | 0.034 |
| IV (bottom) | 11.59 | 268.09 | 0.043 | 0.022 |
| V (interface) | 10.42 | 269.31 | 0.039 | 0.016 |
| HIT= 4.92 GPa, EIT= 189.92 GPa |
HIT= 12.18 GPa, EIT= 250.03 GPa |
HIT= 5.32 GPa, EIT= 198.97GPa |
|
| Load |
![]() KIC= 3.71 [MNm-3/2] |
![]() KIC= 1.00 [MNm-3/2] |
![]() KIC= 1.41 [MNm-3/2] |
|
10N | |||
|
15N |
HIT= 14.05 GPa, EIT= 260.21 GPa |
HIT=9.57 GPa, EIT= 234.46 GPa |
HIT= 4.34 GPa, EIT= 167.05 GPa |
![]() no crack |
![]() KIC= 2.15[MNm-3/2] |
![]() no crack |
|
|
20N |
HIT= 12.50 GPa, EIT= 226.04 GPa |
HIT= 10.10 GPa, EIT= 266.39 GPa |
HIT= 16.45 GPa, EIT= 184.7 GPa |
![]() KIC = 1.59 [MNm-3/2] |
![]() KIC= 1.43 [MNm-3/2] |
![]() KIC = 0.76 [MNm-3/2] |
|
| HIT= 12.90 GPa, EIT= 211.04 GPa |
HIT= 10.34 GPa, EIT= 214.42 GPa |
HIT= 5.87 GPa, EIT= 178.08 GPa |
|
|
25N |
![]() KIC= 1.61 [MNm-3/2] |
![]() KIC= 2.68 [MNm-3/2] |
![]() KIC= 0.84 [MNm-3/2] |
|
30 N |
HIT= 11.21 GPa, EIT= 212.57 GPa |
HIT= 5.81 GPa, EIT= 159.32 GPa |
HIT= 5.59 GPa, EIT= 161.8 GPa |
![]() KIC= 1.96 [MNm-3/2] |
![]() KIC= 0.76 [MNm-3/2] |
![]() KIC= 0.65 [MNm-3/2] |
| Scratch Length | Load [N] |
Lx [µm] |
Ly [µm] |
Acn x10-3 [mm2] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.2 mm | 10 | 151.74 | 104.41 | 15.84 |
| 15 | 108.86 | 152.68 | 16.62 | |
| 20 | 205.76 | 183.42 | 37.74 | |
| 25 | 115.51 | 259.56 | 29.98 | |
| 2.4 mm | 10 | 112.47 | 138.13 | 15.54 |
| 15 | 127.50 | 201.98 | 25.64 | |
| 20 | 162.92 | 170.41 | 27.76 | |
| 25 | 170.71 | 198.34 | 33.86 | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).














