Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Batch and Continuous Flow Method of Separation and Recovery of Co(II) and Ni(II) Using an Analog of Glycine-Betaine Based Ionic Liquid

Submitted:

11 March 2026

Posted:

12 March 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
This study presents an innovative approach for the selective extraction of Co(II) and its separation from Ni(II) using ethyl ester glycine-betaine derivatives, specifically tri(n-pentyl)[2-ethoxy-2-oxoethyl]ammonium dicyanamide, as extractants in combi-nation with continuous-mode liquid–liquid contact. Semi-pilot-scale implementation requires non-equilibrium conditions, characterized by short contact times between ef-fluent and extractant phases. To address this, we propose dissolving analog of gly-cine-betaine ionic liquid (AGB-IL) in low-viscosity MIBK solvents to enhance mass transfer while reducing dependence on fossil-based solvents. Liquid–liquid extraction and continuous-flow stripping experiments were designed based on prior batch results and conducted in a saline environment, employing a chaotropic electrolyte for extrac-tion and a kosmotropic electrolyte for stripping. Both open and closed systems were tested to compare extractive performance with batch conditions and with scenarios representative of industrial operations. Results indicate that continuous-flow systems achieve performance comparable to batch systems in terms of extraction efficiency, Co/Ni separation coefficients, and recyclability. These findings provide proof of con-cept for the development of semi-pilot and pilot-scale processes for efficient cobalt re-covery.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

The production of lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries has skyrocketed in recent years. Nickel and cobalt, key raw materials for cathode components in this technology, are now considered strategic metals, with an increasing demand for ultra-high purity (>99.99%) products [1,2,3,4]. Currently, high-purity Ni(II) and Co(II) compounds are mainly obtained through hydrometallurgical processes from primary resources. However, given the limited lifetime of Li-ion batteries, recycling spent batteries to recover these metals has become essential—not only to supplement market supply but also to mitigate environmental pollution [5,6,7].
A major challenge in producing high-purity Ni(II) and Co(II) lies in their separation. Due to their similar ionic radii, oxidation states, and coordination numbers, achieving clean and efficient separation is difficult. Solvent extraction remains the most widely used method [8], yet it suffers from significant limitations. Common extractants [9,10,11,12,13] typically yield separation coefficients below 10, and the process requires high concentrations of mineral acids, particularly during the stripping stage.
Consequently, current methods cannot deliver a clean, efficient, and low-consumption separation of Ni(II) and Co(II). Developing innovative methodologies is therefore crucial. This includes identifying new extractants and designing extraction strategies that minimize the use of mineral acids.
In recent years, ionic liquids (ILs) have attracted considerable attention as alternative media or novel extractants in liquid–liquid extraction processes [13,14,15]. Room-temperature hydrophobic ionic liquids (RTILs) have shown promise as a process for metal recovery, industrial wastewater purification, and lithium-ion battery waste recycling for the recovery of heavy metals like lithium, cobalt, nickel, platinum, silver, and gold [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Their modularity enables tailored design for specific applications, allowing multiple extraction strategies depending on the metals’ coordination properties.
In previous work [31], we demonstrated that dicyanamide-based ionic liquids diluted in organic solvents can selectively extract Co(II) and Ni(II) in saline media. The dicyanamide anion exhibits moderate metal-ion coordination ability [32], allowing for reversible extraction. The extraction yields in non-saline media are relatively low, whereas they can become nearly quantitative by adding salts with chaotropic anions (e.g., NaNO3 or NaCl). Metals can then be recovered using water or saline solutions containing kosmotropic anions. This approach also reduces ionic liquid loss during back-extraction, as kosmotropic salts decrease IL solubility.
The present work aims to develop an innovative approach for the selective extraction of Co(II) and its separation from Ni(II), using ionic liquids as extractants in conjunction with continuous-mode operation for efficient liquid–liquid contact. Semi-pilot-scale implementation requires non-equilibrium conditions, meaning short contact times between effluent and extractant phases. To achieve this, we propose dissolving ionic liquids in low-viscosity organic solvents—preferably biorefinery-derived solvents with favorable ecotoxicological profiles—to optimize mass transfer while reducing reliance on fossil-based solvents.
A key challenge is to determine whether extraction performance achieved with pure ionic liquid phases can be maintained when diluted in organic solvents and operated in continuous mode. Here, we report the use of dicyanamide (Dca) salts of tri(n-pentyl)[2-ethoxy-2-oxoethyl]ammonium ionic liquids (scheme 1) for selective Co(II) extraction and Co(II)/Ni(II) separation from aqueous solutions.
The choice of the analog of glycine-betaine based ionic liquids (AGB-ILs) is motivated by their structural modularity, enabling customized design for specific applications. Furthermore, scaling up extraction processes requires significant quantities of ionic liquids—from grams in batch tests to tens of grams in continuous systems—making cost control critical. Commercial ionic liquids are often prohibitively expensive, limiting industrial adoption. In contrast, glycine-betaine analogs developed by our group can be synthesized in a few steps from readily available reagents, allowing production at scale at a cost approximately eight times lower than that of commercial ILs such as butylmethylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ([Bmim][Tf2N]).
In our previous work, we developed methods for preparing ionic liquids based on the [Bu3NC2OC2]+ cation [21]. We have recently begun developing a similar approach for accessing ionic liquids incorporating the glycine-betaine-analogue cation [Pn3NC2OC2]+[31], which affords ionic liquids with enhanced hydrophobicity and may therefore represent more suitable candidates for the development of continuous extraction processes involving larger volumes of effluents.”
Optimization of continuous-mode experiments will build on static-mode results. Batch tests will assess key parameters influencing Co(II) extraction, such as aqueous-to-organic phase ratios, before transitioning to continuous operation. Finally, we explore the use of sodium sulfate as a back-extractant in both batch and continuous modes, as well as the recyclability of the ionic liquid.
Scheme 1. Structure of AGB-ILs used for Co(II) and Ni(II) extraction.
Scheme 1. Structure of AGB-ILs used for Co(II) and Ni(II) extraction.
Preprints 202557 sch001

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

Sodium thiosulfate was obtained from Acros Chemical, while CoCl2 and NiCl2 were purchased from Aldrich. All chemicals and reagents were used as received without further purification. Stock aqueous solutions of metal ions were prepared by dissolving the corresponding salts in double-distilled, deionized water.

2.2. Synthesis of Ionic Liquids

AGB-ILs based on tri(n-pentyl)[2-ethoxy-2-oxoethyl]ammonium ([Pn3NC2OC2], with Pn = n-pentyl) cation combined with bromide ([Pn3NC2OC2][Br]) and dicyanamide ([Pn3NC2OC2][Dca]) anions were synthesized following the procedure described in the literature [31].

2.2.1. N,N,N-Tri(n-pentyl)[2-ethoxy-2-oxoethyl]ammonium Bromide [Pn3NC2OC2][Br]

Yield : 92%. Elemental analysis : Calculated for C19H40NO2Br (MW = 394,43 g.mol-1) : C 57,8%, H 10,22% et N 3,55%. Found : C 57,54%, H 10,14% et N 3,64%. RMN 1H, δ/ppm (500 MHz, CDCl3) : 0,90 [t, 9H, 3CH3(e)] ; 1,35 [m, 15H, 6CH2(d+c)] + CH3(β)] ; 1,75 [m, 6H, 3CH2(b)] ; 3,36 [m, 6H, 3CH2(a)] ; 4,25 [q, 2H, CH2(1)] ; 4,66 [s, 2H, CH2(α)]. RMN 13C, δ/ppm (125,7 MHz, CDCl3) : 13,79 [3CH3(e)] ; 13,93 [CH3(ß)] ; 22,11, 22,23 [3CH2(d+c)]; 28,31 [3CH2(b)] ; 57,69 [CH2(1)] ; 60,70 [3CH2(a)] ; 62,85 [CH2(α)] ; 164,75 [CO(2)]. IR, v/cm-1 : 2957, 2932, 2873 (vC-H) ; 1738 (vC=O).

2.2.2. N,N,N-Tri(n-pentyl)[2-éthoxy-2-oxoéthyl]ammonium Dicyanamide [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca]

Yield : (91%). Elemental analysis : Calculated pour C21H40N4O2 (MW = 380,57 g.mol-1) : C 66,28%H, 10,59% et N 14,72%. Found : C 65,82%, H 11,03% et N 14,35%. RMN 1H, δ/ppm (500 MHz, CDCl3) : 0,88 [t, 9H, 3CH3(e)] ; 1,33 [m, 15H, 6CH2-CH2(d+c) + CH3(β)]; 1,67 [m, 6H, 3CH2(b)] ; 3,46 [m, 6H, 3CH2(a)] ; 4,19 [s, 2H, CH2(1)] ; 4,27 [q, 2H, CH2(α)]. RMN 13C, δ/ppm (125,7 MHz, CDCl3) : 13,71 [3CH3(e)] ; 13,89 [CH3 (β)] ; 21,78, 22,02 [3CH2(d+c)] ; 28,17 [3CH2(b)] ; 56,84 [CH2(1)] ; 60,46 [3CH2(a)] ; 63,20 [CH2(α)] ; 119,91 [(2CN)] ; 164,11 [CO(2)]. IR, ν/cm-1 : 2958, 2933, 2873 (νC-H) ; 2226, 2190, 2127 (νDca) ; 1744 (νC=O).

2.3. Physical Measurements

Elemental analyses (C, H, N, and S) were carried out on elementary CHNS thermo-electron FLASHEA 1112 series. 1H and 13C NMR spectrum was recorded in CDCl3 at room temperature with a Brüker AC 500 MHz spectrometer. Chemical shifts (in ppm) for 1H NMR spectra were referenced to residual protic peaks. IR spectra of ionic liquids were recorded on PerkinElmer Spectrum Version 10.4.00. UV–Vis spectra were recorded using a Cary 5000 UV–Vis–NIR spectrometer. Metal concentrations were determined by ICP-OES for Ni and Co or by UV–Vis analysis.

2.4. Extraction and Stripping Experiments in Batch

2.4.1. Extraction Experiments

Aqueous metal solutions were prepared by dissolving the respective chloride salts in deionized water. The organic phase was prepared by dissolving 2.5 g of AGB-IL in 10 mL of methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK). Metal ion distribution ratios were determined by mixing 2 mL of the organic phase with 2 mL of the aqueous phase. The mixture was shaken for 12 h to reach equilibrium, then centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 min. Both phases were clear and transparent after separation and were analyzed individually.
The concentration of metal ions in the organic phase was calculated from the difference between the initial and final concentrations in the aqueous phase. The extraction efficiency (%E) was determined using the following equation:
E = 100 C i n C f i n C i n
where Cin and Cfin (mol.L-1) are the concentration of metal ions in the initial and the final aqueous solution before and after extraction, respectively. The extraction percentages (%E) were determined at 298 K. The concentration of Co(II) and Ni(II) solutions are 5.10-2 mol.L-1.
The distribution coefficient (D) is calculated using the following formula:
D = C i n C f i n C f i n V w V I L
Vw and VIL correspond to the volume of water and ionic liquid phases, respectively. The maximum D value measured in this study is assumed to be 103. The relative uncertainty on D is ± 10%. Experimental results done in duplicate agree within 5%.
The separation factor (βM1/M2) was employed to express the selectivity of the extraction between two metals M1 and M2 and was calculated as βM1/M2 = D(M1)/D(M2).

2.4.2. Stripping

Stripping experiments were performed by contacting the ionic liquid phase containing the extracted metal with 2 mL of either deionized water or an aqueous Na2SO4 solution (1.5 mol.L-1) under stirring for 4 h. The percentage of metal recovered was determined from the analysis of the aqueous phase.

2.5. Continuous-Mode Extraction and Stripping Experiments

2.5.1. Extraction Experiments

Continuous extraction experiments were carried out using a column equipped with a Durant Masterflex L/S Digital Economy Drive peristaltic pump and a Büchi rotary agitator. Synthetic aqueous feed solutions of Co(II) and Ni(II) were prepared at a concentration of 5 10-2 mol.L−1 in NaCl 4 mol.L-1. Ionic liquids were dissolved in MIBK pre-saturated with water, and the extraction phase was maintained at ambient temperature.
The process consisted of passing the aqueous solution through a column containing a defined volume of extractant phase. In a typical experiment, 100 mL of the aqueous solution was pumped into the column at a flow rate of 4–6 mL·min−1. The column was divided into two compartments separated by a permeable glass wall:
-
Upper compartment: Agitated zone where extraction occurs.
-
Lower compartment: Non-agitated zone for phase decantation and separation.
Before each experiment, the lower compartment was prefilled with 50 mL of aqueous solution, corresponding to its volume. As the organic phase is less dense than the aqueous phase, the latter flows through the extractant phase and occupies most of the lower compartment. The system operated in a closed circuit, with the aqueous solution exiting the column being reinjected into the feed reservoir. The outlet flow rate was adjusted to match the pump rate, maintaining a constant feed volume (50 mL).
Samples (1 mL) of the feed solution were collected at regular intervals for analysis of residual Co(II) and/or Ni(II) concentrations by ICP-OES or UV–Vis spectroscopy.
Figure 1. Scheme of the continuous mode extraction system.
Figure 1. Scheme of the continuous mode extraction system.
Preprints 202557 g001

2.5.2. Stripping

After complete removal of the feed solution, back-extraction was performed using 100 mL of either deionized water or an aqueous Na2SO4 solution (1.5 mol.L-1). The operation was carried out in a closed-loop system: 50 mL of the back-extraction solution was injected at the top of the column, while the remaining 50 mL served as the feed solution. Similar to the extraction stage, the back-extraction process consisted of continuously circulating the stripping solution through the column, allowing it to contact the organic phase before being reinjected at the column inlet. Each back-extraction cycle lasted 30 min and could be repeated twice if metal recovery was incomplete after the first cycle.
The recyclability of the ionic liquid was evaluated over four consecutive extraction/back-extraction cycles under continuous-mode conditions.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis of Ionic Liquids

The ionic liquids [Pn3NC2OC2][Br] and [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] were synthesized in large quantities (up to 100 g) and fully characterized using spectroscopic techniques (1H and 13C NMR and IR) as well as elemental analysis [31].

3.2. Batch Extraction Experiments

Figure 2 compares the Co(II) extraction yields using [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] with those obtained with [Pn3NC2OC2][Br] under similar conditions. Figure 3 illustrates the extraction yields of Co(II) and Ni(II) in [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] dissolved in MIBK, for varying NaCl concentrations.
The ionic liquid [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] was obtained from [Pn3NC2OC2][Br] through an anion-exchange reaction with NaDca. Consequently, [Pn3NC2OC2][Br] is considered the reference compound and serves as a control in this study for both batch and continuous processes.
Figure 2 clearly highlights the benefit of performing an anionic metathesis on the brominated compound using a salt containing an anion with higher coordinating ability than bromide. When NaCl concentration increases from 0 to 4 M, the extraction yield rises from 0 to 33% with [Pn3NC2OC2][Br], whereas it increases from 10% to 92% with [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca]. This improvement is attributed to the strong coordinating power of the dicyanamide anion, which enhances the extraction efficiency of the ionic liquid. The dicyanamide anion integrates more readily into the coordination sphere of Co(II) compared to bromide.
For [Pn3NC2OC2][Br], the relatively low extraction in NaCl media below 4 M suggests that the process depends on the formation of the tetrahedral CoCl42- complex, which requires a high concentration of Cl ions. In contrast, with [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca], the extraction mechanism involves the formation of more stable mixed Co/Dca/Cl complexes, explaining the significantly higher extraction yields.
Figure 3 illustrates that the addition of an electrolyte containing a chaotropic anion in the aqueous phase is a well-established strategy to enhance metal extraction yields [32]. In a previous study [32], we demonstrated that hydrophobic glycine-betaine-based Dca ionic liquids are highly effective for the selective separation of Co(II) and Ni(II) in NaCl media.
Under conditions similar to those used in dynamic experiments, a 4 M NaCl solution provides the optimal medium for Co/Ni separation, achieving extraction yields of 92% for Co(II) and 10.5% for Ni(II), resulting in a separation factor close to 100. At 2 M NaCl, the separation factor exceeds 100; however, the extraction yields decrease to 53% for Co(II) and only 0.2% for Ni(II). In the absence of NaCl, Ni(II) extraction is negligible, while Co(II) extraction remains limited to approximately 10%.
These results confirm the critical role of chloride concentration in promoting selective extraction, with higher ionic strength favoring the formation of mixed complexes that enhance cobalt recovery while maintaining nickel rejection.
In this study, we seek to investigate the impact of operational parameters such as aqueous and organic phase dilution on extraction yield, in order to better control the extraction process in dynamic mode and help define the optimal operating conditions for the transition from static to continuous mode. Our experiments will focus on the extraction of Co(II) in [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] dissolved in MIBK.
Figure 4 illustrates the variation in Co(II) ion extraction efficiency resulting from the dilution of (i) the aqueous phase, (ii) the organic phase, or (iii) both phases. Throughout the dilution process, the nIL/nCo ratio remains constant at 13.5. The graph shows that diluting either phase significantly decreases the extraction yield of Co(II) ions by [Pn3NC2OC2]Dca]. The most pronounced effect occurs when the aqueous phase is diluted by a factor of 7, resulting in a 18% decrease in extraction yield (from 97% to 79%). In comparison, under the same dilution conditions, the organic phase shows a smaller decrease of 13% (from 97% to 86%). Simultaneous dilution of both phases leads to an overall reduction of more than 30% in extraction yield, up to a dilution factor of 5.
Several factors may account for this decline in extraction efficiency upon dilution: (i) increased exchange between dicyanamide anions and chloride ions, (ii) solvation of the ionic liquid anion in the organic phase due to IL dilution, and (iii) losses of IL caused by its dissolution in the aqueous phase. This raises an important question: how does the metal’s coordination sphere evolve under dilution, and do these behaviors follow the law of mass action? Our previous study [36] proposed the following equilibrium to describe Co(II) extraction in saline media:
(2+x)[Pnt3NC2OC2][Dca]IL + Co2+(aq) + (2+y)Cl(aq) [Pn3NC2OC2]2[Co(Dca)(2+x-y)(Cl)(2−x+y)]IL + x[Pn3NC2OC2][Cl]IL + yDcaaq
Log D = log K + (2+y) log [Cl] + (2+x) log ([Pn3NC2OC2][Dca]IL) − x log [Pn3NC2OC2]2[Cl]IL -ylog[Dca]
This mechanism relies on: (i) the formation of anionic tetrahedral complexes [Co(Dca)(2+(x+y)(Cl)(2−(x+y)] in the organic phase, (ii) the ability of chloride ions to enter the Co(II) coordination sphere, and (iii) their capacity to form stable ion pairs with the cation in the organic phase, thereby shifting the equilibrium toward extraction. Here, x and y are complementary values whose sum equals two; a non-zero x implies y = 0 and vice versa, simplifying the expression of the mass action law. According to this hypothesis, a positive x leads to the formation of [Pn3NC2OC2][Cl] species in the organic phase, whereas a non-zero y results in the release of free Dca ions into the aqueous phase. The formation of a tetrahedral complex, previously demonstrated extensively in our earlier work [31,32], produces an intense blue coloration of the organic phase, fully consistent with the measured spectral characteristics. Its formation is observed even at low Cl concentrations, which are incompatible with the formation of the tetrahedral CoCl42− complex, meaning that dicyanamide ions are present in the coordination sphere of Co(II).

3.3. Determination of Extracted Species in the Organic Phase

Determining the nature of the species extracted in the organic phase is a delicate issue. To address this, the slope method was applied to study the influence of the concentrations of ionic liquid (IL), dicyanamide (Dca-), and chloride ions, and to specify the stoichiometry of the Co–Dca complexes extracted in the organic phase [26].
Our previous observations revealed no linear dependence between log D and log[Dca(Cl)], or log [IL], indicating the formation of a mixed tetrahedral complex Co[Dca](x)Cl(4-x) with non-integer values of x. The Co(II) coordination sphere strongly depends on experimental conditions, and the Dca/Cl ratio, as these two ligands are easily interchangeable [31].
However, as the experiments described in Figure 4 were all carried out for an identical nIL/nCo ratio of 13.5, it may be interesting to see whether the trends observed can be predicted by a similar mass action law encompassing all the experimental data for the experiments depicted in Figure 4.
Since all experiments in Figure 4 were conducted at an identical nIL/nCo ratio of 13.5, it is relevant to examine whether the observed trends can be predicted by a mass action law encompassing all experimental data. For each dataset:
  • Complex formation was considered for x values between 0 and 2 and y values between 0 and 2.
  • A mass balance was performed, and equilibrium constants were calculated relative to the proposed mass action laws ([Cl] concentration was assumed constant at 4M NaCl and excluded from equilibrium constant calculations).
  • For each (x, y) pair:
    -
    species concentrations at equilibrium were determined.
    -
    The law of mass action was applied relative to equilibrium (1).
  • The average equilibrium constant for each hypothesis was used to recalculate extraction rates for each dataset.
  • Calculated extraction rates were compared with experimental values using Figure 5, which plots experimental vs. calculated extraction rates.
The relevance of each hypothesis was assessed using the Least squares method and based on the Slope (theoretical value = 1), and correlation coefficient values.
The Statistical analysis indicates that the best fit corresponds to: y = 0, and x = 1, suggesting a stoichiometry of Co/Dca/Cl ≈ 1/3/1, regardless of experimental conditions.
This is in agreement with the formation of [Pn3NC2OC2]2[Co(Dca)3(Cl)], corresponding to the following equilibrium.
[Pn3NC2OC2][Dca]IL + Co2+(aq) + 2Cl(aq) [Pn3NC2OC2]2[Co(Dca)3(Cl)]IL + [Pn3NC2OC2][Cl]IL
It should be noted that good correlations are nevertheless obtained for the value of x between 0.5 and 1.5 and that of y between 0.5 and 0 (slope values range between 1.02 and 1.03, and correlation coefficients are comprised between 0.98 and 0.99). These results corroborate the fact that the coordination sphere does not allow for the identification of a single, well-defined complex.
Instead, the stoichiometry of the complex in the organic phase can vary depending on experimental conditions, particularly the nIL/nCo ratio, which confirms our previous observations.
The equilibrium constant of equilibrium (3) could be determined and is equal to 11.53 ± 0.06. The extraction process can be reversed by changing NaCl with an electrolyte with a kosmotrope anion such as SO42-. Indeed, due to its high hydrophilicity, the sulfate anion is unable to form an ion-pair with the [Pn3NC2OC2]+ cation and allows a shift in equilibrium (1) to the left, leading to stripping of Co(II) in aqueous solution.

3.4. Development of a Continuous Extraction Protocol

Our objective is to develop a protocol using a single column and a peristaltic pump to continuously extract metals from synthetic effluents. To achieve this, we first evaluated the extractive performance of the organic phase for Co(II) extraction and stripping, and conducted experiments under closed- and open-circuit conditions:
-
Open circuit: The effluent is collected at the bottom of the column and analyzed.
-
Closed circuit: The effluent collected at the bottom is reinjected at the top of the column.
Operating under closed-circuit conditions simulates a batch process, allowing us to verify whether the information gathered in batch mode can be applied to a continuous process.
For continuous extraction experiments, we used a single type of column. This is a glass column with a height of 23 cm and a diameter of 4 cm, corresponding to a total volume capacity of 275 mL. The volume of the agitated phase is approximately 230 mL, while that of the non-agitated phase is approximately 50 mL. The agitated and non-agitated compartments are separated by horizontal permeable glass tubes that allow direct communication between them while preventing the agitation vortex from propagating. This setup enables an almost instantaneous transfer between the two compartments.
Experiments in open circuit were designed to assess the feasibility of separating Co(II) from Ni(II) using the proposed strategy.
We also investigated the reversibility and recyclability of the extraction process over four extraction/stripping cycles. To compensate for yield loss due to the larger organic phase volume, higher nIL/nCo ratios were used compared to batch conditions. The ratios tested were 13, 26, and 40, respectively
Since organic phase dilution negatively affects Co(II) extraction yield, the solvent volume was minimized to the smallest amount required to dissolve 15 g of ionic liquid (maximum quantity used), while maintaining acceptable viscosity. Thus, all experiments used 50 mL of MIBK. The standard experimental conditions to carry out extraction in continuous mode are as follows:
-
Organic phase volume: 50 mL
-
Ionic liquid mass (m IL): 5, 10, 15 g
-
Effluent volume: 100 mL
-
Stripping solution: H2O or aqueous Na2SO4 (1.5 M), V = 100 mL
-
Stirring speed: 4 rpm·s-1
-
Flow rate: 4 and 6 mL·min-1
These conditions were used to study the influence of ionic liquid concentration in the organic phase, the stirring speed, and the system performance over multiple extraction-stripping cycles.
After each experiment, organic phases were collected, combined, and evaporated. To recover the ionic liquid, an anion metathesis using aqueous NaDca was then performed under the same conditions as during synthesis to restore its effectiveness.

3.4.1. Influence on Stirring Speed

The influence of stirring speed on the extraction system’s performance was evaluated by determining the extraction yield of Co(II) through up to 5 elution cycles of 100 mL of the same aqueous Co(II) solution under stirring ranging from 0 to 10 rpm s-1. We show that without stirring, the extraction yields are less than 10% (not shown here), which means that the passage of the aqueous phase through the organic phase does not generate sufficient contact between the metal and the extractant to effectively transfer the metal from the aqueous phase to the organic phase. This indicates that in continuous mode, contact between the organic and aqueous phases should be enhanced on a very low timescale. The influence of stirring speed occurs between 2 and 4 rpm.s-1, the extraction speed significantly influences the extraction yield, which increases from 5 to 90%. For stirring speeds exceeding 4 rpm/s, the latter has no influence, with an extraction yield reaching its maximum value over 90%.

3.4.2. Influence on the Flow Rate

Figure 6 illustrates the effect of the feed solution flow rate on the extraction performance over time, for flow rates of 4 mL·min-1 and 6 mL·min-1, during periods shorter than 1500 s. The results show that a higher addition rate leads to a higher extraction yield.
The extraction yield reaches its maximum after approximately 1500 s, which corresponds to the passage of 100 mL and 150 mL of feed solution through the column at flow rates of 4 mL·min−1 and 6 mL·min−1, respectively. A flow rates of 4 mL.mn-1 allow a contact time between the feed solution and the extracting phase sufficient for the system to approach a near-equilibrium conditions with a single pass of the feed solution. This conclusion is supported by the fact that the extraction yields obtained in the column are comparable to those measured in batch mode, as will be discussed later in this article. However, at higher flow rates, the contact time becomes too short to reach equilibrium within a single pass, and achieving maximum yield would then require processing a volume equal to approximately 1.5 times the volume of the feed solution. A flow rate of 4 mL·min−1 (14.5 L·h−1) provides suitable reference conditions for semi-pilot-scale testing. At this stage of our investigation, further optimization is not required.

3.4.3. Effect of Ionic Liquid Dilution on Extraction Performance

Dilution of the ionic liquid (IL) in the extracting phase affects its performance in terms of extraction yield. This suggests that maintaining system performance may require working with higher [IL]/[M(II)] ratios than those used in batch experiments. However, increasing the amount of ionic liquid raises questions about its impact on solution properties such as the viscosity of the extracting phase and on process recyclability.
Figure 7 presents the extraction yields obtained by passing 100 mL of a Co(II) solution (0.01 M) through 50 mL of organic phase containing 5, 10, or 15 g of [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] at a flow rate of 6 mL·min−1. These masses correspond to nIL/nCo ratios of 13, 26, and 39.
Figure 7 shows that increasing the amount of ionic liquid dissolved in the organic phase significantly improves system efficiency, even under continuous extraction conditions. For example, increasing the IL content from 5 g to 15 g raises the extraction yield from 81% to 96.5%. To achieve quantitative extraction (yield > 90%), nIL/nCo ratios of at least 25 are required. This may not be a major drawback if process recyclability remains high.
The extraction yields obtained with a similar nIl/nCo ratio in batch experiments range between 76%, and 96% and are close to those obtained from continuous flow extraction experiments. This indicates that the contact time between the aqueous and organic phases in continuous mode is sufficient to approach equilibrium. The extraction rate confirms this after 1500 s, which corresponds to the time needed to elute the entire feed solution. At this point, the extraction rate reaches 91% of the equilibrium value.

3.4.4. Influence of the Saline Media in Continuous Mode

3.4.4.1. Comparison of Extraction Yields in Continuous and Batch Systems
Figure 8 presents the maximum Co(II) extraction yields obtained in continuous, closed-system experiments using [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] and [Pn3NC2OC2][Br] as extractant phases. To enable comparison with batch experiments, the operating conditions were kept similar: an nIL/nCo ratio of 26 and a volume ratio of 2 between the aqueous and organic phases.
The results obtained in continuous mode confirm the trend observed in batch mode: extraction yield increases with salt concentration, and [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] exhibits higher extraction efficiency than [[Pn3NC2OC2][Br]. The most notable observation is the strong similarity between the extraction results in continuous and batch experiments. Under comparable conditions, the yields differ by no more than 5%, suggesting rapid, almost instantaneous, transfer kinetics during continuous operation.
Under the experimental conditions used, the system reaches equilibrium within 30 to 40 minutes, corresponding to approximately two complete passes of the solution.
3.4.4.2. Assessment of the Organic Phase Extraction Capacity
Loading curves were conducted in both open and closed systems to determine the maximum extraction capacity of the organic phase. In the open system, the column is continuously supplied with a fresh 0.05 M Co(II) solution. The treated solution is collected at the base of the column but is not recirculated. Samples are taken at regular intervals for analysis.
The open system more closely simulates conditions relevant for scale-up and real-world applications, where the system operates under non-equilibrium conditions. In contrast, the closed system reflects static conditions, where equilibrium is more readily achieved. In this setup, each extraction cycle lasts 40 minutes, after which the entire metal solution is collected and replaced with 100 mL of fresh solution, mimicking a simple continuous extraction process.
Figure 9 compares the loading curves obtained from both systems. The loading capacity of the organic phase increases progressively until reaching a plateau of 0.36 mol of Co(II) per mol of ionic liquid in the closed system, and 0.33 in the open system. Saturation of the organic phase occurs more rapidly in the open system, with maximum extraction achieved when 0.02 mol of Co(II) is introduced, compared to 0.013 mol in the closed system.
These differences can be attributed to the varying concentrations of the aqueous phase in equilibrium with the organic phase. In the open system, the continuous renewal of the metal solution maintains a constant Co(II) concentration of 0.05 mol.L-1, ensuring a consistent driving force for extraction. Conversely, in the closed system, the Co(II) concentration in the aqueous phase decreases over time due to metal partitioning into the organic phase, resulting in a more gradual extraction process.
The maximum loading capacity of 0.36 mol of Co(II) per mol of ionic liquid aligns closely with the proposed stoichiometry of Co(Dca)3Cl, based on previous static extraction experiments. The loading curves also suggest that, even in concentrated NaCl media, it is not feasible to incorporate more than one chloride ion into the coordination sphere of Co(II).

3.4.5. Recyclability of the IL

The recyclability of the ionic liquid (IL) in continuous mode was evaluated over four extraction–stripping cycles using 100 mL of a 0.01 mol·L−1 Co(II) solution. At the end of each cycle, the aqueous phase was analyzed to determine the concentration of the organic cation and estimate the cumulative losses of the IL.
The stripping step was carried out by passing 100 mL of either pure water or an aqueous Na2SO4 solution (1.5 mol·L−1) through the organic phase under the same conditions as those used for Co(II) extraction.
Figure 10 presents the evolution of extraction and stripping yields across the cycles, along with the concentrations of dissolved organic cation.
The system maintained high performance after four back-extraction cycles, with extraction yields remaining above 88%. The ionic liquid demonstrated good recyclability, with stripping yields exceeding 90% even after five cycles under similar conditions. In contrast, when water was used instead of Na2SO4 solution, the stripping yield did not exceed 80%.
This difference is directly related to the lower IL loss observed with each cycle, as shown by the concentration of organic cation solubilized after each stripping step. The release of organic cations into the aqueous phase increases with each cycle due to the Dca/Cl exchange occurring during the extraction step. This substitution renders the IL more hydrophilic, increasing its solubility in water—[Pn3NC2OC2][Cl] being more water-soluble than [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca].
After five cycles, the cumulative IL loss was 21% and only 3% when stripping was performed with water and Na2SO4 solution, respectively.
The chemical characterization (NMR spectroscopies and elemental analysis) of the IL recovered after each extraction and stripping cycle shows that the IL has not undergone any alteration. In addition, the extraction performance obtained for each of the five cycles confirms that the IL can be successfully recovered and reused without losses on the systems extraction performance

3.4.6. Co(II)/Ni(II) Separation in Saline Media

The efficiency of [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca], diluted in MIBK, was evaluated for the separation of cobalt and nickel in an equimolar aqueous Co(II)/Ni(II) solution, as well as in a 4 M NaCl aqueous medium. The total metal concentration was maintained at 0.02 mol·L−1. Experimental conditions were consistent with those previously used for metal extraction from monometallic solutions.
Under these conditions, the extraction yields for Co(II) and Ni(II) were 93.1% and 1.79%, respectively, resulting in a separation factor exceeding 500. These yields are comparable to those obtained from monometallic solutions, with an even higher separation factor observed in the bimetallic system. This outcome highlights the effectiveness of the column-based continuous extraction system for selectively separating Co(II) from Ni(II).
These findings provide a strong proof of concept for the use of saline media in continuous extraction processes aimed at the strategic separation of 3d transition metals. Future work will focus on optimizing the operational parameters of the process, with particular attention to enhancing extraction efficiency, improving Co/Ni selectivity, and increasing the recyclability of the system.
Potential avenues for improvement include the use of extractants with greater hydrophobicity than [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca], which could reduce ionic liquid losses and enhance process sustainability. Additionally, optimizing the ionic liquid/solvent ratio and selecting more environmentally friendly solvent systems will be explored to develop an extraction phase with tailored properties. Adjustments to the column design, such as reducing its diameter while maintaining a constant volume, will also be investigated to increase the contact time between the aqueous and organic phases, thereby improving overall process performance.

3.4.7. Comparison with Other Existing Processes

The extraction and separation of cobalt(II) and nickel(II) using ionic liquids primarily rely on two distinct strategies, each offering specific advantages depending on the operating conditions:
a) Cation-Exchange
This approach employs ionic liquids functionalized with complexing groups, such as organophosphorus acids (e.g., Cyanex 272). These extractants operate via a cation-exchange mechanism involving proton displacement. Here, pH control is critical, as it directly influences the relative affinity of Co(II) and Ni(II) for the extractant, thereby governing their separation. While ionic liquids based on carboxylate anions (e.g., [P8888][Oleate]) can effectively bind both metals, their selectivity remains limited, making selective separation challenging [27].
a)
Anion-exchange
This method leverages the formation of anionic metal complexes, such as CoCl42−, which interact with the ionic liquid’s anion (typically Cl). Common extractants include Aliquat 336, Cyphos IL 101, [P8888][Cl], and [P44414][Cl]. The formation of CoCl42− requires highly chlorinated environments (e.g., HCl > 6 M). Under these conditions, Ni(II) does not form stable chlorocomplexes, enabling efficient Co/Ni separation.Performance and limitations of existing systems
Most reported systems have been optimized at the laboratory scale, achieving extraction yields of 90% to 100% in batch mode [30]. However, continuous processes remain rare, complicating direct performance comparisons. Notable exceptions include:
- a reactor developed by Wellens et al. [33] using a stationary [P66614][Cl] phase, which achieved separation factors exceeding 52,000 in 4 M NaCl solutions with metal concentrations of 1–2 mmol·L−1.
- a multi-stage mixer–settler process based on Cyanex 272, enabling Ni/Co separation at moderate pH (5–6), though requiring large volumes of organic phase and precise pH control [16,34].
- a supported membrane extraction system proposed by Zante et al. [28]using [P66614][Cl], which facilitates Ni(II)/Co(II) separation, although Co(II) extraction does not exceed 75% at 9–10 mol·L−1 HCl.
Our approach may constitute an innovative alternative, since it relies on the formation of mixed anionic complexes Co(Dca)4₋ₓClₓ2− using based Dca ionic liquids. This strategy offers several advantages:
- an effective Co/Ni separation at Cl concentrations above 2 M,
- an independence from pH, unlike commercial ionic liquids (e.g., Aliquat 336 or Cyphos IL 101), which require highly acidic conditions (HCl > 6 M). Batch experiments confirm that our method remains efficient even in moderately acidic media (pH > 2). Since Dca exhibits negligible acid–base behavior, strict pH control is unnecessary.
Our process achieves results comparable to those reported in the literature in a single-step extraction while using moderate NaCl concentrations, making it suitable for scale-up. While our study focuses on demonstrating proof of concept, the process still offers significant potential for optimization.

3.4.8. Economic Advantages and Outlook

Although the high cost of ionic liquids often limits their industrial deployment, our ionic liquids can be synthesized in only 2–3 steps with high yields. This enables straightforward production of up to 100 g at the laboratory scale, at costs roughly an order of magnitude lower than those of commercially available ionic liquids. Such cost efficiency strongly supports the economic viability of future scale-up.
Based on reagent costs, the estimated synthesis cost for 100 g of [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] is approximately € 50. In contrast, 100 g of Cyphos IL 101 and [P66614][Cl] cost approximately € 240 and € 347, respectively (Sigma-Aldrich pricing). When molecular weight is taken into account, the economic advantage becomes even more pronounced—exceeding a factor of 8 relative to Cyphos IL 101 and a factor of 17 relative to [P66614][Cl].

4. Conclusion

The objective of this study was to establish a proof of concept for the development of a continuous process aimed at treating industrial effluents containing Co(II) and Ni(II) ions, with a focus on their selective separation. This work builds upon previous batch experiments that identified an effective strategy for Co/Ni separation based on their differing affinities for the dicyanamide (Dca) anion.
The results demonstrate that extraction yields and the Co/Ni separation factor are significantly enhanced in a 4M NaCl aqueous medium compared to non-saline conditions. This improvement is attributed to equilibrium shifts that promote system reversibility and facilitate metal recovery after extraction.
Importantly, this study confirms that the strategy developed under equilibrium conditions can be successfully adapted to continuous processes operating under non-equilibrium conditions. All trends observed in static mode are observed in continuous flow experiments. The performance observed in continuous flow experiments in terms of extraction efficiency and selectivity is comparable to that achieved in batch systems.
This work thus provides a solid foundation for scaling up the process. Works on optimizing operational parameters, including extraction yields, Co/Ni selectivity, and the recyclability of IL are in progress. These efforts will aim to enhance the sustainability and industrial applicability of the process.

Funding

This research received no external funding or This research was funded by Région GrandEst grant number [20PRC102] and The APC was funded by Région Grand-Est.

References

  1. Di Lecce D., Marangon V., Jung H.G., Tominaga Y., Greenbaum S., Hassoun J., Glyme-based electrolytes: suitable solutions for next-generation lithium batteries, Green Chem. 2022, 24, 1021–1048. [CrossRef]
  2. Cheng Q., Marchetti B., Chen X., Xu S., Zhou X.D., Separation, purification, regeneration and utilization of graphite recovered from spent lithium-ion batteries - A review, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107312.
  3. Larsson K., Binnemans K., Selective extraction of metals using ionic liquids for nickel metal hydride battery recycling, Green Chem. 2014, 16, 4595−4603. [CrossRef]
  4. European Commission. Study on the review of the list of Critical Raw Materials; Pub lications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2017.
  5. Goodenough J.B., Park K.S., The Li-Ion Rechargeable Battery: A Perspective, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1167–1176.
  6. Ku H., Jung Y., Jo M., Park S., Kim S., Yang D., Rhee K., An E.M., Sohn J., Kwon K., Recycling of spent lithium-ion battery cathode materials by ammoniacal leaching, J. Hazard Mater. 2016, 313, 138–146.
  7. Mishra G., Jha R., Meshram A., Singh K.K., A review on recycling of lithium-ion batteries to recover critical metals, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108534. [CrossRef]
  8. Kursunoglu S., Ichlas Z.T., Kaya M., Solvent extraction process for the recovery of nickel and cobalt from Caldag laterite leach solution: The first bench scale study, Hydrometallurgy 2017, 169, 135–141. [CrossRef]
  9. Cheng C.Y. , Purification of synthetic laterite leach solution by solvent extraction using D2EHPA, Hydrometallurgy 2000, 56, 369–386. [CrossRef]
  10. Park K.H., Reddy B.R., Jung S.H., Mohapatra D., Transfer of cobalt and nickel from sulphate solutions to spent electrolyte through solvent extraction and stripping, Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 51, 265–271.
  11. Sayar N.A., Filiz M., Sayar A.A., Extraction of Co(II) and Ni(II) from concentrated HCl solutions using Alamine 336, Hydrometallurgy 2009, 96148–96153. [CrossRef]
  12. Liu Y., Lee M., Separation of Co and Ni from a chloride leach solution of laterite ore by solvent extraction with extractant mixtures, J. Indus. Eng. Chem. 2015, 28322–327.
  13. Huddleston J.G., Rogers R.D., Room temperature ionic liquids as novel media for ‘clean’ liquid–liquid extraction, Chem. Commun. 1998, 1765–1766. [CrossRef]
  14. Zhao H., Xia S., Ma P., Use of ionic liquids as ‘green’ solvents for extractions, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2005, 80, 1089–1096.
  15. Visser E., Swatloski R.P., Reichert W.M., Mayton R., Sheff S., Wierzbicki A., Davis Jr J.H., Rogers R.D., Task-specific ionic liquids for the extraction of metal ions from aqueous solutions, Chem. Commun. 2001, 135–136.
  16. Zhang L., Hessel V., Peng J., Liquid-liquid extraction for the separation of Co(II) from Ni(II) with Cyanex 272 using a pilot scale Re-entrance flow microreactor, Chem. Eng. Jour. 2018, 332, 131-139. [CrossRef]
  17. Coll M.T. , Fortuny A., Kedari C.S., Sastre A.M., Studies on the extraction of Co(II) and Ni(II) from aqueous chloride solutions using Primene JMT-Cyanex272 ionic liquid extractant, Hydrometallurgy 2012, 125, 24-28. [CrossRef]
  18. Cholico-Gonzalez D., Chagnes A., Cote G., Avila-Rodriguez M., Separation of Co(II) and Ni(II) from aqueous solutions by bis(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl)phosphinic acid (Cyanex 272) using trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium chloride (Cyphos IL 101) as solvent, J Mol. Liq. 2015, 209, 203–208. [CrossRef]
  19. Messadi A., Mohamadou A., Boudesocque S., Dupont L., Guillon E., Task-specific ionic liquid with coordinating anion for heavy metal ion extraction: cation exchange versus ion-pair extraction, Sep. Pur. Technol. 2013, 107, 172–178. [CrossRef]
  20. Boudesocque S. Mohamadou A., Martinez A., Dechamps I., Dupont L., Use of dicanamide ionic liquids for metal ions extraction, RSC. Advances 2016, 6, 107894–107904.
  21. Diabate P.D., Dupont L., Boudesocque S., Mohamadou A., Novel task specific ionic liquids to remove heavy and noble metals from aqueous solutions, Metals 2018, 8, 412–426.
  22. Wieszczycka K. , Filipowiak K., Wojciechowska I., P.Aksamitowski P., Novel ionic liquid-modified polymers for highly effective adsorption of heavy metals ions, Sep. Pur. Technol. 2020, 236, 116313. [CrossRef]
  23. Papaiconomou N., Génand-Pinaz S., Leveque J.M., Guittoneau S., Selective extract ion of gold and platinum in water using ionic liquids a simple two-step extraction process, Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 979-1982. [CrossRef]
  24. Boudesocque S., Mohamadou A., Conreux A., Marin B., Dupont L., The recovery and selective extraction of gold and platinum by novel ionic liquids, Sep. Pur. Technol. 2019, 210, 824-834. [CrossRef]
  25. Tu Nguyen V., Lee J., Jeong J., Kim B., Cote G., Chagnes A. , Extraction of Gold(III) from Acidic Chloride Media Using Phosphonium-based Ionic Liquid as an Anion Exchanger, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 1350-1358.
  26. Milevsky N.A., Zinovieva I.V., Zakhodyaeva Y.A., Voshkin A.A.,Extractive Separation of Co/Ni Pair With the Deep Eutectic Solvent Aliquat 336/Timol, Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering 2022, 56(1), 45-52. [CrossRef]
  27. Raj T., Chandrasekhar K., Park J., Varjani S., Sharma P., Kumar D., Yoon J.J., Pandey A., Kim S.H., Synthesis of fatty acid-based ammonium ionic liquids and their application for extraction of Co(II) and Ni(II) metals ions from aqueous solution, Chemosphere 2022, 307, 135787.
  28. Zante G., Boltoeva M., Masmoudi A., Barillon R., Trébouet D., Selective separation of cobalt and nickel using a stable supported ionic liquid membrane, Sep. and Purif. Technol. 2020, 252, 117477. [CrossRef]
  29. Kovacevic A., Ricardo García J.A., Tolazzi M., Melchior A., Sanadar M., Selective Co(II) and Ni(II) separation Using the Trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium Decanoate Ionic Liquid Molecules 2024, 29, 4545. [CrossRef]
  30. Meshram P., Agarwala N., Abhilash, A review on assessment of ionic liquids in extraction of lithium, nickel, and cobalt vis-a-vis conventional methods RSC Adv., 2025, 15, 8321.
  31. Boulafrouh L., Boudesocque S., Mohamadou A., Dupont L., Separation of Co(II) and Ni(II) using an analog of glycine betaine based on task ionic liquid, Separation 2023, 10, 305. [CrossRef]
  32. Diabate P.D., Boudesocque S., Mohamadou A., Dupont L., Efficient separation of Cobalt, Nickel and Copper using analogues of glycine-betaine based ionic liquids. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 244, 116782.
  33. Wellens S., Thijs B., Binnemans K., An environmentally friendlier approach to hydrometallurgy: highly selective separation of cobalt from nickel by solvent extraction with undiluted phosphonium ionic liquids, Green Chem., 2012, 14, 1657. [CrossRef]
  34. Rodrigues R.I. , Deferm C. , Binnemans K., Separation of cobalt and nickel via solvent extraction with Cyanex-272: Batch experiments and comparison of mixer-settlers and an agitated column as contactors for continuous counter-current extraction , Separation and Purification Technology 2022, 296, 121326. [CrossRef]
Figure 2. Extraction yields (%E) of Co(II) by [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] and [Pn3NC2OC2][Br] dissolved in MIBK for different NaCl concentrations: [Co(II)] = 0.01 mol L−1; Vaq = 4 mL ; [IL]org= 0.2 g mL−1 ; Vorg = 2 mL.
Figure 2. Extraction yields (%E) of Co(II) by [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] and [Pn3NC2OC2][Br] dissolved in MIBK for different NaCl concentrations: [Co(II)] = 0.01 mol L−1; Vaq = 4 mL ; [IL]org= 0.2 g mL−1 ; Vorg = 2 mL.
Preprints 202557 g002
Figure 3. Extraction yields (%E) of Co(II) and Ni(II) by [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] dissolved in MIBK for different NaCl concentrations: [metal] = 0.01 mol L−1; Vaq = 4 mL ; [IL]org= 0.2 g mL−1 ; Vorg = 2 mL.
Figure 3. Extraction yields (%E) of Co(II) and Ni(II) by [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] dissolved in MIBK for different NaCl concentrations: [metal] = 0.01 mol L−1; Vaq = 4 mL ; [IL]org= 0.2 g mL−1 ; Vorg = 2 mL.
Preprints 202557 g003
Figure 4. Extraction yields (%E) of Co(II) by [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] for different NaCl concentration in pure IL phase or dissolved in MIBK: nCo(II) = 5*10-5 mol ; nIL = 6.5*10-4 mol ; [NaCl] = 4 mol.L-1 (a)Vaq = 1mL ; Vorg 1 to 7 mL ; (b) Vaq = 1 to7 mL ; Vorg = 1 mL ; (c) Vaq = Vorg = 1 to 5 mL.
Figure 4. Extraction yields (%E) of Co(II) by [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] for different NaCl concentration in pure IL phase or dissolved in MIBK: nCo(II) = 5*10-5 mol ; nIL = 6.5*10-4 mol ; [NaCl] = 4 mol.L-1 (a)Vaq = 1mL ; Vorg 1 to 7 mL ; (b) Vaq = 1 to7 mL ; Vorg = 1 mL ; (c) Vaq = Vorg = 1 to 5 mL.
Preprints 202557 g004
Figure 5. Experimental and calculated extraction yield (%E) of Co(II) by [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] upon the dilution of aqueous and organic phase nCo(II) = 5*10-5mol; nIL = 6.5*10-4mol; NaCl 4 mol.L-1; Vaq = 1 to 5 mL, Vorg = 1 to 5 mL.
Figure 5. Experimental and calculated extraction yield (%E) of Co(II) by [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] upon the dilution of aqueous and organic phase nCo(II) = 5*10-5mol; nIL = 6.5*10-4mol; NaCl 4 mol.L-1; Vaq = 1 to 5 mL, Vorg = 1 to 5 mL.
Preprints 202557 g005
Figure 6. Extraction yields (%E) of Co(II) by [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] in NaCl 4 mol.L-1; Vaq = 50 mL; Vorg = 100 mL; [Co(II)] = 0.01 mol.L-1; mIL = 10 g.
Figure 6. Extraction yields (%E) of Co(II) by [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] in NaCl 4 mol.L-1; Vaq = 50 mL; Vorg = 100 mL; [Co(II)] = 0.01 mol.L-1; mIL = 10 g.
Preprints 202557 g006
Figure 7. Extraction yield (%E) of Co(II) by [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] for 2 [Il] in NaCl 4 mol.L-1; Vorg = 50 mL; Vaq = 100 mL ; [Co(II)] = 0.01 mol.L-1 ; mIL = 5 ( ), 10 ( ) or 15 ( ) g ; flow rate = 4 mL.mn-1.
Figure 7. Extraction yield (%E) of Co(II) by [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] for 2 [Il] in NaCl 4 mol.L-1; Vorg = 50 mL; Vaq = 100 mL ; [Co(II)] = 0.01 mol.L-1 ; mIL = 5 ( ), 10 ( ) or 15 ( ) g ; flow rate = 4 mL.mn-1.
Preprints 202557 g007
Figure 8. Extraction yield (%E) of Co(II) by [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] and [Pn3NC2OC2][Br] ; Vaq = 100 mL; Vorg = 50 mL; [Co(II)] = 0.01 mol.L-1 ; mIL = 10g.
Figure 8. Extraction yield (%E) of Co(II) by [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] and [Pn3NC2OC2][Br] ; Vaq = 100 mL; Vorg = 50 mL; [Co(II)] = 0.01 mol.L-1 ; mIL = 10g.
Preprints 202557 g008
Figure 9. Loading curves (%E) of Co(II) by [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] ; Open system: Vorg = 50 mL; Vaq = 100 mL; [Co(II)] = 0.05 mol.L-1; mIL = 10 g; flow rate = 6 mL.mn-1 Closed system: Vorg = 50 mL; Vaq = 100 mL; [Co(II)] = 0.05 mol.L-1; flow rate = 6 mL.mn-1; cycle = 40 mn.
Figure 9. Loading curves (%E) of Co(II) by [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] ; Open system: Vorg = 50 mL; Vaq = 100 mL; [Co(II)] = 0.05 mol.L-1; mIL = 10 g; flow rate = 6 mL.mn-1 Closed system: Vorg = 50 mL; Vaq = 100 mL; [Co(II)] = 0.05 mol.L-1; flow rate = 6 mL.mn-1; cycle = 40 mn.
Preprints 202557 g009
Figure 10. Extraction and stripping yields (%E) of Co(II) by [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] in NaCl 4 mol.L-1; Vaq = 100 ml; Vorg = 50ml; [Co(II)] = 0.01 mol.L-1; mIL = 10g; stripping solution: Na2SO4 1.5M.
Figure 10. Extraction and stripping yields (%E) of Co(II) by [Pn3NC2OC2][Dca] in NaCl 4 mol.L-1; Vaq = 100 ml; Vorg = 50ml; [Co(II)] = 0.01 mol.L-1; mIL = 10g; stripping solution: Na2SO4 1.5M.
Preprints 202557 g010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated