Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Integrated Transcriptomic and Root Microbiome Responses of Lettuce to Beneficial Endophytic Bacteria in Hydroponic Systems

A peer-reviewed version of this preprint was published in:
International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2026, 27(7), 3072. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27073072

Submitted:

27 February 2026

Posted:

02 March 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Controlled environment agriculture (CEA) relies on hydroponic systems to achieve high yields, yet optimizing plant performance remains a challenge. Beneficial endophytic bacteria offer a sustainable solution by promoting growth and nutrient uptake. Here, we investigated the mechanistic basis of growth enhancement in lettuce (Lactuca sativa) inoculated with Pseudomonas psychrotolerans IALR632 in a nutrient film technique (NFT) system. Growth measurements showed significant increases in shoot and root biomass and leaf greenness. RNA-Seq profiling at 4, 10, and 15 days after transplanting revealed dynamic transcriptional reprogramming, with 38, 796, and 7,642 differentially expressed genes, respectively. MapMan and GO analyses indicated up regulation of pathways related to cell wall remodeling, lipid metabolism, nitrogen assimilation, and stress adaptation, alongside modulation of ethylene signaling. Root microbiome sequencing demonstrated distinct community shifts confirmed by Analysis of Similarity (ANOSIM) (R = 1, p = 0.028), with enrichment of genera linked to nutrient cycling and plant growth promotion. These findings provide integrated molecular and ecological evidence that IALR632 enhances lettuce growth by coordinating host gene expression and rhizobiome restructuring, offering a mechanistic framework for microbial inoculant strategies in hydroponic horticulture.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Controlled environment agriculture (CEA) is increasingly essential for ensuring global food security as urbanization accelerates and arable land becomes limited. Leafy green vegetables, particularly lettuce, are ideal candidates for CEA due to their rapid growth, high yield, and superior produce quality. However, the widespread adoption of hydroponic systems - a key component of CEA - is challenged by high initial infrastructure costs, which can be offset by increased crop productivity.
Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) have gained significant attention in sustainable agriculture for their ability to enhance plant growth, improve nutrient uptake, increase stress tolerance, and suppress pathogens. In hydroponic systems, PGPB have been shown to improve plant performance and contribute to overall crop quality [1,2,3,4,5]. Several studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of PGPB in hydroponic lettuce production [1,6,7,8]. Among these, Pseudomonas spp. represents a diverse group of Gram-negative, rod-shaped, motile ϒ-proteobacteria known for their plant-beneficial traits, including growth promotion, abiotic stress tolerance, and pathogen inhibition [9,10]. For instance, Pseudomonas sp. LSW25R enhanced tomato growth, increased calcium uptake, and reduced disease incidence in hydroponic systems [11]. Similarly, Pseudomonas chlororaphis treatment improved biomass and height in romaine lettuce grown in a window hydroponic setup [12]. These bacteria promote nutrient uptake, produce phytohormones, enhance microbial diversity, and reduce reliance on chemical inputs, offering a sustainable approach to crop management. PGPB enhances lettuce growth in hydroponic systems through multiple mechanisms: solubilizing nutrients, fixing atmospheric nitrogen, and producing growth regulators such as auxins and vitamins. They also mitigate abiotic stresses by lowering ethylene levels via ACC deaminase activity and protect plants against pathogens through antibiotic production and competitive exclusion.
A healthy root microbiome is essential for optimal plant health and development. However, little is known about how PGPB affect the root-associated microbial community and host plant gene expression in hydroponic environments. Lee et al. reported both transcriptomic and microbial shifts in lettuce grown in high-performing hydroponic systems inoculated with beneficial bacteria [12]. Yet, the underlying mechanisms remain largely unexplored. To address this gap, we investigated the effects of Pseudomonas psychrotolerans IALR632 on lettuce plants grown in a nutrient film technique (NFT) hydroponic system. Specifically, we examined changes in plant gene expression through RNA-seq and alterations in the root microbiome to understand the molecular and microbial mechanisms driving plant growth promotion.

2. Results

2.1. Lettuce Growth Promotion by IALR632

Inoculation with IALR632 significantly enhanced lettuce growth in NFT units (Figure 1). Shoot fresh weight increased by 18.2% on day 14 and 13.9% on day 21 relative to the control. On day 21, root fresh weight, root dry weight, and leaf greenness (SPAD value) were also significantly higher in IALR632-treated plants.

2.2. Lettuce Transcriptome Analyses

Approximately 90% of RNA-seq reads of each sample aligned to the reference genome. Of aligned reads, approximately 76-80% were assigned to annotated features of the reference genome. The average transcriptome size of samples in each treatment and aligned and assigned percentages of reads to the reference genome was documented in Supplementary Table 1.
The reference genome cv. Salinas v11 had 70,163 transcript IDs. They belonged to 48,985 unique genes. There were 1,115 unassigned transcript IDs. The corresponding gene IDs of differentially expressed transcripts (Padj < 0.01) at 4, 10, or 15 days after transplanting (DAT) were all unique, indicating that each transcript ID mapped to a distinct gene ID. The set of reference gene lists (background genes) filtered for DAVID analysis contained 24,322, 24,345, and 24,620 genes for comparisons conducted at 4, 10, and 15 DAT, respectively.
Separate Venn diagrams for up- and down-regulated DEGs for the three sampling points are given in Figure 2A and 2B, respectively. There were no up- or down-regulated genes common to all three comparisons. More genes were differentially expressed in plants sampled at 15 DAT compared to the other two comparisons. Plants sampled at 4 DAT had a total of 38 genes (both up- and down-regulated) while plants at 10 and 15 DAT resulted in 796 and 7,642 DEGs, respectively.
The DESeq2 differential expression results and transcript-level metadata for lettuce (Lactuca sativa cv. Green Oakleaf) transcriptomes were analyzed at 4, 10, and 15 DAT and listed in Supplementary Table 2. The table integrated normalized count data generated by DESeq2 from transcriptomic read counts produced via the Read Mapping and Transcript Assembly (RMTA) pipeline and included corresponding gene annotations from the L. sativa cv. Salinas v11 reference genome.
Volcano plots were generated to facilitate the visualization of up- and down-regulated genes at 10 and 15 DAT. At 10 DAT, 210 genes met the criteria of |log2 fold change| > 1 and adjusted p value < 0.01. At 15 DAT, the number of genes satisfying these thresholds increased markedly to 2342, representing a substantial rise in differential expression (Supplementary Figure S1).

2.3. Metabolic Pathway Changes

MapMan was used to show gene expression changes in the metabolic pathways. At 10 DAT, it showed that some genes were up-regulated in cell wall, tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA), oxidative pentose phosphate (OPP), fermentation, sulphate, and tetrapyrrole pathways (Figure 3A). These are related to plant growth and related anabolic activities. Up-regulation of some transcripts in fermentation pathway may be an adaptive stress response mechanism to low oxygen levels in the root zone of hydroponic plants. More genes related to sulphate pathway were also up-regulated, which indicate active nutrient assimilation and the synthesis of essential sulfur-containing compounds vital for growth and survival [13,14]. The tetrapyrrole biosynthesis pathway is a fundamental metabolic route producing vital molecules like chlorophyll (photosynthesis), heme (respiration, oxygen transport), siroheme (sulfur/nitrogen assimilation), and vitamin B12 [15,16].
At 15 DAT, large numbers of genes were up-regulated (Figure 3B). Up-regulation of cell wall and lipid pathways indicated active remodeling and strengthening of cell walls supporting faster or sturdier development. Lipid metabolism suggests enhanced synthesis of membrane and storage lipids (Figure 3B). Lipids are crucial for cell division, signaling, and stress adaptation [17]. Their upregulation points to active growth and possibly improved membrane integrity under bacterial inoculation. Nitrate (NO₃⁻) and ammonia (NH₃) metabolisms had also increased, reflecting improved nitrogen uptake and assimilation. However, light reactions (photosynthesis) had down-regulation, which suggests reduced activity of photosynthetic electron transport. This could mean the plant is reallocating energy away from photosynthesis toward growth and nutrient assimilation, or that bacterial treatment alters chloroplast activity at this stage. Down-regulation of photorespiration is also visible on the MapMan plot (Figure 3B). This is generally beneficial as less energy is wasted on oxygen fixation. This implies improved carbon efficiency, potentially allowing more resources to be directed toward biomass and metabolite production.

2.4. Biological Process

Gene Ontology (GO) Biological Process (BP) terms annotated by DAVID (GOTERM_BP_DIRECT) were analyzed at 4, 10, and 15 DAT to track temporal changes in gene functions. These terms provide broad, hierarchical functional annotations. At 4 DAT, no enriched GO terms were found for up-regulated genes; six down-regulated terms were identified (Supplementary Table 3), with cellular oxidant detoxification (GO:0098869) and protein folding (GO:0006457) being most significant. At 10 DAT, 222 up-regulated and 235 down-regulated genes were linked to BP terms. Defense response (GO:0006952) had the most up-regulated genes [20], versus 3 down-regulated. Other key processes showing mixed regulation included DNA-templated transcription, proteolysis, and transmembrane transport (Figure 4A). Growth-related processes such as mRNA transcription, lignin catabolism, response to light, and response to stress were enriched among up-regulated genes (Supplementary Table 4), indicating early activation of developmental pathways. By 15 DAT, transcriptional changes intensified: 2,351 up-regulated (63.1%) and 2,200 down-regulated (56.1%) genes were associated with BP terms. Up-regulated genes were mainly involved in growth and proliferation—translation (191 genes), protein phosphorylation (147 genes), and DNA-templated transcription regulation (138 genes). Down-regulated genes also clustered in protein phosphorylation and transcriptional regulation, suggesting a complex cellular rebalancing (Figure 4B). Enriched up-regulated terms such as translation, DNA replication, cell division, and ribosome biogenesis support enhanced development, while down-regulated terms indicate reduced investment in light harvesting and stress response (Figure 4B, Supplementary Table 5).

2.5. Growth and Stress-Related Genes

Given the higher biomass in bacterium-treated plants, DEGs at 10 and 15 DAT were examined for growth and stress-related genes. The acid phosphatase (AP) gene LOC111898238 was consistently up-regulated at both time points. At 10 DAT, purple acid phosphatase (PAP) gene LOC111904408 also exhibited increased expression, with no phosphate-related genes down-regulated. By 15 DAT, additional PAP (LOC111918260, LOC111915916) and AP (LOC111898238, LOC111904674) genes were up-regulated, indicating sustained phosphate mobilization, though three PAP genes were down-regulated (Supplementary Table 6).
Endophytic bacteria producing ACC deaminase can lower ethylene levels by degrading ACC, potentially reducing ethylene-responsive gene expression. Thus, ethylene-responsive transcription factors (ERFs) and ethylene biosynthesis genes (ACS, ACO) were examined. At 10 DAT, three ACO genes were up-regulated and four down-regulated. At 15 DAT, eight ACO genes were down-regulated versus four up-regulated (Supplementary Table 6). No ACS genes were differentially expressed, and ERFs showed no significant down-regulation for either sampling dates.
At 15 DAT, enriched BP terms indicated down-regulation of hormone response pathways for ethylene (GO:0009723), auxin (GO:0009733), gibberellin (GO:0009739), and abscisic acid (GO:0009737), while other hormone-related processes and stress responses—such as response to water deprivation O:0009414) and cellular response to heat (GO:0034605)—were up-regulated (Supplementary Table 5).

2.5. Root Microbiome Analysis

2.5.1. Sequencing Data Quality and Filtering

After sequencing data quality check, the distribution of effective sequence lengths is shown in Figure S2. The rarefaction curves reached saturation, indicating sufficient sequencing depth for comprehensive characterization of bacterial diversity across samples (Figure S3).

2.5.2. Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU) Clustering and Abundance

A total of 653 OTUs were identified across all samples. Of these, 574 OTUs were shared between the control and IALR632-inoculated groups, while 52 were unique to the inoculated samples and 27 were unique to the controls. A heatmap of the 30 most abundant OTUs revealed both similarities and differences between the control and treatment groups (Figure S4).

2.5.3. Bacterial Community Diversity

Alpha diversity: Alpha diversity was assessed using Chao1 and Shannon indices to evaluate richness and evenness within each group. The Shannon index indicated higher microbial diversity in IALR632-treated samples compared to controls, while Chao1 values also reflected increased richness in the treated group (Figure 5A). Beta diversity: Beta diversity analysis was performed to assess differences in microbial community composition between groups. Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity revealed clear separation between IALR632-treated and control samples, suggesting distinct community structures (Figure 5B).
ANOSIM analysis: To statistically validate differences in community composition, analysis of Similarity (ANOSIM) was performed. The analysis yielded an R-value of 1 and a p-value of 0.028, indicating that between-group differences (treatment vs. control) were significantly greater than within-group variation, confirming a strong treatment effect on the root microbiome (Figure 5C). NMDS analysis: Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) positions each object in multidimensional space based on functional classification information, with distances between points representing their dissimilarities. The resulting spatial plot reflects these relationships (Figure 5D,E). Stress values were <0.001, indicating an excellent fit (values from 0.001 to ≤0.05 are considered a good fit, and >0.05 to ≤0.1 are considered fair), which showed that bacterial treatment group is clearly separated from the control group based on their functional classification information.

2.5.4. Taxonomic Composition at Phylum and Genus Levels

At the phylum level, eight out of the 18 detected phyla showed significant differences in relative abundance between IALR632-treated and control samples (Figure 6A). Of these, only Chlamydiae was significantly reduced in population (−50%) in the treated group compared with the control. The remaining seven phyla were significantly enriched, with increases ranging from +34% to +224% relative to controls.
At the genus level, a total of 83 genera were identified across all samples. The dominant taxon in both treatments was an unclassified genus, representing 85.04% in controls and 86.93% in IALR632-treated samples (p = 0.0135). Relative abundance patterns for the 30 most abundant genera are shown in Figure 6B. Among the top genera, bacterial inoculation markedly reduced the relative abundance of Methylotenera (−68%), Rhizobium (−62%), Methylibium (−16%), and Sphingomonas (−45%). In contrast, it substantially increased the abundance of Sediminibacterium (+68%), Hyphomicrobium (+114%), Sphingobium (+72%), Devosia (+158%), Mycobacterium (+513%), Rhodoplanes (+103%), and Runella (+1920%).

3. Discussion

3.1. Lettuce Gene Expression Profiling

The plant endophyte Pseudomonas psychrotolerans IALR632 is a growth-promoting bacterium primarily known for its ability to solubilize insoluble phosphates, along with siderophore production and ACC deaminase activity [18]. Previous studies have demonstrated significant growth-promoting effects on tall fescue in vitro, as well as on soil-grown tomatoes, and lettuce in various hydroponic systems [18,19]. The present study corroborates these findings, showing increased biomass in IALR632-treated hydroponic lettuce compared to untreated control. Transcriptomic analysis in this study revealed elevated expression of genes associated with phosphorus uptake in lettuce treated with IALR632 (Supplementary Table 6), consistent with prior demonstrations that plant-associated phosphate solubilizing endophytes enhance insoluble phosphate acquisition and promote plant growth [18,20,21]. Additionally, IALR632 led to transcriptional modulation of ethylene biosynthesis, specifically affecting ACO genes, with eight transcripts down-regulated and four up-regulated at 15 DAT (Supplementary Table 6). This was accompanied by significant down-regulation of the GO term response to ethylene (GO:0009723; FDR = 0.02) (Supplementary Table 5), suggesting that IALR632 may attenuate ethylene-mediated stress signaling - a mechanism commonly associated with enhanced plant growth and delayed senescence under non-stress conditions [22,23].
Enrichment of plant growth and development related BP GO terms such as mRNA transcription, lignin catabolic process, response to light stimulus, etc. in IALR632-treated lettuce at 10 DAT suggests that the endophyte exerts a growth-promoting influence starting in the early vegetative phase (Supplementary Table 4). Notably, at 15 DAT, although specific hormone-responsive GO terms such as those linked to auxin (GO:0009733), abscisic acid (GO:0009737), and gibberellin (GO:0009739) were down-regulated, the broader category response to hormone (GO:0009725) showed increased expression (Supplementary Table 5). This suggests a shift toward alternative hormonal signaling pathways, potentially involving cytokinin, salicylic acid, or jasmonic acid [23,24]. The concurrent up-regulation of stress-responsive GO terms, including response to water deprivation and cellular response to heat, may reflect a priming effect, whereby IALR632 enhances basal defense readiness without triggering full stress responses [25]. In hydroponic systems, crops are subjected to osmotic and ionic stress, resulting in reduced water uptake, disrupted nutrient homeostasis, and yield loss [26]. The presence of IALR632 may have mitigated these effects by specifically up-regulating response to water deprivation (GO:0009414). These findings align with previous reports of endophyte-mediated modulation of plant hormone networks to promote resilience and growth under fluctuating environmental conditions.
In a controlled trial, soilless lettuce plants inoculated with a consortium of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) were investigated for plant growth, ecophysiology, and metabolic profile under a low-nutrient regime [27]. Investigators found on average the plant biomass increased by 25% in the PGPR-inoculated plants due to enhanced leaf and root growth. PGPR inoculation induced significant metabolic reprogramming in the leaves, affecting several pathways related to growth, development, and stress responses. Results of our lettuce study broadly concur with that study.

3.2. Root Microbiome Shifts in Response to IALR632 Inoculation

Inoculation with Pseudomonas psychrotolerans IALR632 led to substantial restructuring of the root-associated bacterial community in hydroponically grown lettuce. At the phylum level, eight of the 18 detected phyla exhibited significant relative abundance changes. Chlamydiae was the only phylum with reduced relative abundance (−50%) in the treated group, which may decrease the prevalence of obligate intracellular bacteria that can divert host resources. In contrast, seven phyla, including Chloroflexi, WPS-2, Planctomycetes, TM7, TM6, and Actinobacteria, were enriched by 34–224% compared to controls. Many of these phyla include members involved in carbon and nitrogen turnover, organic matter decomposition, and production of bioactive metabolites that can benefit plant growth and health.
At the genus level, a total of 83 genera were detected, with the top-ranked group being unclassified taxa that dominated both treatments (~85–87% relative abundance). Among the remaining top 30 most abundant genera, Methylotenera, Rhizobium, Methylibium, and Sphingomonas exhibited significantly decreased relative abundance following bacterial inoculation. The decline of these genera may reduce nitrogen loss via denitrification (e.g., Methylotenera) or minimize potential competition for root exudates (e.g., Sphingomonas). In contrast, several genera were markedly enriched: Sediminibacterium, Hyphomicrobium, Sphingobium, Devosia, Mycobacterium, Rhodoplanes, and Runella. These taxa include species reported to participate in degradation of complex organics, mobilization of phosphorus and other nutrients, production of phytohormones, and modulation of rhizosphere signaling pathways. The substantial increase in Runella, in particular, may indicate an important role for Bacteroidota-affiliated heterotrophs in recycling organic compounds released by plant roots or microbial activity.
The interesting phenomenon is that Pseudomonas genus is not among top 30 most abundant genera. IALR632 inoculation had only 0.045% of genus Pseudomonas in relative abundance, lower than 0.065% in control group. Similarly, Yacoub et al. (2024) showed that the abundance level of Trichoderma species was low in the samples treated with Trichoderma compared with the control samples [28]. This interesting finding implies inoculated endophytes may function through modulating other microbes in complex ways.
Overall, these bacterial compositional changes indicate that IALR632 inoculation promotes a shift toward a more functionally diverse and metabolically active root microbiome, with greater potential for nutrient mobilization, stress mitigation, and suppression of less beneficial or resource-competing taxa. This restructuring likely contributes to the enhanced growth performance observed in inoculated lettuce under NFT hydroponic conditions.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Lettuce Seeds and Germination

Seed-coated lettuce (Lactuca sativa cv. Salanova Green Oakleaf) was purchased from Johnny’s Selected Seeds (Fairfield, ME, USA) and sowed in Oasis Grower Solutions Horticubes XL Foam Medium (276 cells). The trays were placed in AmHydro propagation systems (Arcata, CA, USA) and irrigated with water under natural greenhouse light until germination. After emergence, seedlings were irrigated four times daily (1 min each) with Virginia Tech fertilizer solution [19] at an electrical conductivity (EC) of 1.0 ± 0.1 mS/cm and pH 5.9 ± 0.1, measured using an Economy pH/EC Meter (Spectrum Technologies, Inc., Aurora, IL, USA) and adjusted as necessary. Seedlings were prepared for bacterial inoculation approximately one week after sowing.

4.2. Bacterial Strain and Culture

Pseudomonas psychrotolerans IALR632 was originally isolated from leaves of Sorghum halepense in Central Virginia, USA (37.125372, −79.298415) and its 16S rRNA sequence deposited in GenBank (accession no. MZ519967) [18]. For inoculation, a loopful from glycerol stock was grown overnight in 4 mL half-strength Lennox broth (LB) at 30 °C, 200 rpm. This culture was diluted 20-fold in fresh half-strength LB and incubated under the same conditions for ~5 h to an OD₆₀₀ ≈ 1.0 (1.85 × 10⁹ CFU/mL).

4.3. Bacterial Inoculation and Plant Transplant

One mL of bacterial suspension above was applied directly to the root zone of each seedling in the propagation system. Control plants received 1 mL of sterile half-strength LB. After one week, seedlings at the 3–4 true leaf stage were transplanted to nutrient film technique (NFT) units described in the following section.

4.4. Greenhouse NFT System and Growth Measurements

NFT systems (Model NFT0406, CropKing, Lodi, OH, USA) were used, each with six channels (36-plant capacity) and a slope of 2.5%. Dimensions were 139.7 × 139.7 × 78.74 cm. Growth parameters including shoot and root fresh and dry weights and SPAD readings were recorded at 14 and 21 days after transplanting.

4.5. RNA Sampling and Extraction

Lettuce heads were sampled at 4, 10, and 15 days after transplant (DAT), with four biological replicates per treatment. On each date, four random heads per treatment were harvested, immediately placed in plastic containers, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until RNA extraction. Total RNA was isolated using the Thermo Scientific™ GeneJet Plant RNA Purification Kit (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions, diluted to 100 ng/µL, and shipped to Azenta Life Sciences (South Plainfield, NJ, USA) for RNA-seq.

4.6. RNA Sequencing and Transcriptome Analysis

Libraries were constructed and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2000 platform to generate 150 bp paired-end reads. FASTqc, a quality control tool for high throughput data was used to visualize the raw RNA-seq data (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). Since quality of the reads was acceptable, they were uploaded to CyVerse online platform (www.cyverse.org)[29,30] for analysis. Read Mapping and Transcript Assembly (RMTA) app [31] on CyVerse Discovery environment (DE) was used for the raw read analysis. RMTA is a high throughput RNA-seq read mapping and transcript assembly workflow. CyVerse DE is a web-based graphical user interface for data analysis, visualization, and data sharing. The Genome-Guided Mapping route in RMTA was used to produce a read count table for all the samples. The L. sativa cv. Salinas v11 reference genome and related annotated file in GTF format were downloaded from the genome database of National Library of Medicine (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/GCF_002870075.4/) and used for the analysis. Hisat2 [32] option in RMTA was used for aligning reads to the genome. RMTA parameters were configured to target transcripts, with the attribute set to transcript_id for program execution. With this setup, RMTA would identify reads mapped to transcript sequences of the reference genome and provide a count table of reads and their relevant transcript IDs from the annotation file.
The transcripts with low read counts were removed from the table of read counts for downstream analysis. For this, the rows having a sum of read counts <10 across all replicates related to a comparison (i.e. 4, 10, and 15 DAT) were removed from the table. The filtered data table was used in Bioconductor package DESeq2 [33] in R statistical programming language to derive differentially expressed transcripts (DETs) between the IALR632 treated and non-treated control samples for sampling days 4, 10, and 15. DETs with adjusted probability (Padj) <0.01 were extracted from the DESeq output to a different file. The annotated file of the reference genome was imported into the Bioconductor-rtracklayer package (https://bioconductor.org/packages/3.18/bioc/html/rtracklayer.html) of R program to easily look up and extract genomic features and attributes. The gene ID and gene description corresponding to each DET were also extracted and merged with the output file of DESeq2 analysis. The corresponding gene IDs of DETs (Padj < 0.01) were checked for duplicates to see if all gene IDs were unique or if there were any genes corresponding to two or more transcript IDs.

4.7. MapMan Analysis

Pathway analysis of lettuce samples collected at different time points was carried out using the MapMan tool [34]. For this purpose, a MapMan mapping file was generated specifically for lettuce genes through the Mercator platform (https://www.plabipd.de/mercator_main.html). In this process, genes were assigned into functional bins by Mercator4, which organizes them according to hierarchical ontologies.

4.8. DAVID Analysis

The web-based bioinformatics tool “Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery” (DAVID) (https://davidbioinformatics.nih.gov/) [35,36] was used to understand the biological meaning of differentially expressed transcripts in each comparison. The DAVID tool was used to identify enriched biological themes and Gene Ontology (GO) terms and discover functional annotations of enriched gene groups. For each comparison, the original read counts table was examined to identify genes with no detectable expression across any of the samples. These non-expressed genes were excluded, and the resulting filtered gene list was used to construct the reference genome for DAVID analysis. It is necessary to remove unexpressed genes from the reference genome in order to avoid false positives and accurately calculate gene enrichment of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The DEGs were sorted according to log2fold values, and up- and down-regulated genes were analyzed for each comparison separately using DAVID’s default parameters. Biological process (BP) terms from DAVID’s GOTERM_Direct database were examined to elucidate functional patterns in the tested samples. The online multiple list comparator tool hosted by https://molbiotools.com/ was used to prepare Venn diagrams for up- and down-regulated DEGs separately to understand the number of unique and common genes in each comparison.

4.9. Root Sampling and DNA Isolation

Root samples were taken at 14 DAT with 4 biological replicates and immediately placed in liquid nitrogen and stored in -80 °C until DNA extraction. Genomic DNA was isolated from root samples using NucleoSpin Plant II, Mini kit for DNA from plants (Macherey-Nagel, Allentown, PA, USA) following manufactory’s instruction. The genomic DNA was quantified with Quant-iT™ PicoGreen™ dsDNA Assay (Invitrogen, Carksbad, CA, USA). The DNA solutions were diluted to 20 ng/µL and shipped to Azenta Life Sciences (South Plainfield, NJ, USA) for bacterial microbiome sequencing.

4.10. Library Construction and Miseq Sequencing

The three variable regions of 16S rDNA (V3, V4, V5) were amplified and identified various species including archaea. Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform was used for 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing and pair-end chemistry enabled to read as long as 600 bp.

4.11. Bioinformatics Analysis Workflow

Sequencing data quality optimization was conducted using software Cutadapt (v1.9.1), Vsearch (1.9.6) and Qiime (1.9.1). First, the two sequences of each read pair were merged according to overlapping sequences with at least 20 bp long. Then, primer and adapter sequences were removed. The 5' and 3' bases with Q score lower than 20 were removed. The resulting sequences with length > 200 bp would pass this step of processing. Finally, the sequences obtained were then aligned to UCHIME 'Gold' database to identify and remove chimera sequences. Sequences passed this filtering step were deemed as clean data ready for analysis.

4.12. OTU Analysis and Species Annotation

OTU (Operational Taxonomic Units) clusters were defined by a 97% identity threshold for data statistics and analysis using software Qiime (1.9.1) and Vsearch (1.9.6). Unique sequences were extracted from the optimized sequences with the read count information, and all optimized sequences were compared with OTU representative sequences. The sequences of >97% similarity to a specific OTU representative sequence were the same OTU. To obtain the classification information of OTU, a representative sequence was selected for each OTU and annotated using the RDP classifier Bayesian algorithm, thereby to obtain the community composition of each sample.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrated that Pseudomonas psychrotolerans IALR632 significantly promoted lettuce growth under hydroponic conditions through major shifts in pathways related to cell wall remodeling, lipid metabolism, nitrogen assimilation, and hormone signaling and root microbiome restructured toward taxa associated with nutrient mobilization and stress resilience, confirmed by robust diversity and ordination analyses.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.M. and S.L.; methodology, C.M., S.B.A. and R.L.C.; validation, C.M. and R.L.C.; formal analysis, C.M. and S.B.A.; investigation, R.L.C., S.B.A. and C.M.; resources, S.L.; data curation, S.B.A.; writing—original draft preparation, C.M. and S.B.A.; writing—review and editing, R.L.C. and S.L.; supervision, C.M. and S.L.; project administration, C.M.; funding acquisition, C.M. and S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Agricultural Marketing Service through grant (2021B-570).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw RNA-seq FASTQ files generated from lettuce samples in this study are publicly available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under accession number PRJNA1348882 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/PRJNA1348882). Some data supporting the findings of this study are included in the supplementary information files. Any other data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ACC 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid
ANOSIM Analysis of similarities
ACC 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid
ANOSIM Analysis of similarities
BP Biological process
CEA Controlled environment agriculture
CFU Colony forming unit
DAT Days after transplanting
DAVID Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery
DEG Differentially expressed genes
DET Differentially expressed transcript
DW Dry weight
ERF Ethylene-responsive transcription factor
FW Fresh weight
GO Gene ontology
LB Lennox broth
NFT Nutrient film technique
NMDS Non-metric multidimensional scaling
OD Optical density
OPP Oxidative pentose phosphate
OTU Operational taxonomic unit
PCoA Principal Coordinates Analysis
PGPB Plant growth-promoting bacteria
PGPR PGPR: Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
RMTA Read mapping and transcript assembly
SPAD Soil plant analysis development
TCA Tricarboxylic acid cycle

References

  1. Lee, S.; Lee, J. Beneficial bacteria and fungi in hydroponic systems: Types and characteristics of hydroponic food production methods. Sci Hortic 2015, 206–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dhawi, F. The role of plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPMs) and their feasibility in hydroponics and vertical farming. Metabolites 2023, 13, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Moncada, A.; Miceli, A.; Vetrano, F. Use of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and organic fertilization for soilless cultivation of basil. Sci Hortic 2021, 275, 109733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Putra, A. M.; Anastasya, N. A.; Rachmawati, S. W.; Yusnawan, E.; Syib`li, M. A.; Trianti, I.; Setiawan, A.; Aini, L.Q. Growth performance and metabolic changes in lettuce inoculated with plant growth promoting bacteria in a hydroponic system. Sci Hortic 2024, 327, 112868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Aini, N.; Yamika, W. S. D.; Ulum, B. Effect of nutrient concentration, PGPR and AMF on plant growth, yield and nutrient uptake of hydroponic lettuce. Int J Agric Biol 2019, 21, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sheridan, C.; Depuydt, P.; De Ro, M.; Petit, C.; Van Gysegem, E.; Delaere, P.; Dixon, M.; Stasiak, M.; Aciksöz, S.B.; Frossard, E.; Paradiso, R. Microbial community dynamics and response to plant growth-promoting microorganisms in the rhizosphere of four common food crops cultivated in hydroponics. Microb Ecol 2017, 73(2), 378–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Thomas, B. O.; Lechner, S. L.; Ross, H. C.; Joris, B. R.; Glick, B. R.; Stegelmeier, A. A. Friends and foes: Bacteria of the hydroponic plant microbiome. Plants 2024, 13, 3069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Balthazar, C.; Joly, D. L.; Filion, M. Exploiting beneficial Pseudomonas spp. for cannabis production. Front Microbiol 2022, 12, 833172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alattas, H.; Glick, B. R.; Murphy, D. V.; Scott, C. Harnessing Pseudomonas spp. for sustainable plant crop protection. Front Microbiol 2024, 15, 1485197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, S. W.; Ahn, I. P.; Sim, S. Y.; Lee, S. Y.; Seo, M. W.; Kim, S.; Park, S.Y.; Lee, Y.H.; Kang, S. Pseudomonas sp. LSW25R, antagonistic to plant pathogens, promoted plant growth, and reduced blossom-end rot of tomato fruits in a hydroponic system. Eur J Plant Pathol 2010, 126(1), 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lee, S.; An, R.; Grewal, P.; Yu, Z.; Borherova, Z.; Lee, J. High-performing windowfarm hydroponic system: Transcriptomes of fresh produce and microbial communities in response to beneficial bacterial treatment. MPMI 2016, 29(12), 965–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Koprivova, A.; Kopriva, S. Molecular mechanisms of regulation of sulfate assimilation: First steps on a long road. Front Plant Sci 2014, 5, 589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lee, J.; Heo, J.; Lee, E. S.; Kang, H. Y.; Warsadiharja, S. M.; Kim, K.; Kim, K.; Chae, Y.; Pervitasari, A.N.; Priatama, R.A.; Lee, Y.K.; Kim, I.H. Molecular and phenotypic insights into sulfur’s role in enhancing tomato plant growth, stress tolerance, and productivity. Sci Rep 2025, 15, 32773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Larkin, R. M. Tetrapyrrole signaling in plants. Front Plant Sci 2016, 7, 1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Terry, M. J.; Smith, A. G. A model for tetrapyrrole synthesis as the primary mechanism for plastid-to-nucleus signaling during chloroplast biogenesis. Front Plant Sci 2013, 4, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hou, Q.; Ufer, G.; Bartels, D. Lipid signalling in plant responses to abiotic stress. Plant Cell Environ 2016, 39, 1029–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mei, C.; Chretien, R. L.; Amaradasa, B. S.; He, Y.; Turner, A.; Lowman, S. Characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacterial endophytes and plant growth promotion in vitro and in greenhouse. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mei, C.; Zhou, D.; Chretien, R. L.; Turner, A.; Hou, G.; Evans, M. R.; Lowman, S. A potential application of Pseudomonas psychrotolerans IALR632 for lettuce growth promotion in hydroponics. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pan, L.; Cai, B. Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria: advances in their physiology, molecular mechanisms and microbial community effects. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Varga, T.; Hixson, K. K.; Ahkami, A. H.; Sher, A. W.; Barnes, M. E.; Chu, R. K.; Battu, A.K.; Nicora, C.D.; Winkler, T.E.; Reno, L.R.; Fakra, S.C. Endophyte-promoted phosphorus solubilization in Populus. Front Plant Sci 2020, 11, 567918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Glick, B. R.; Todorovic, B.; Czarny, J.; Cheng, Z.; Duan, J.; McConkey, B. Promotion of plant growth by bacterial ACC deaminase. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci 2007, 26, 227–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shahid, M.; Singh, U. B.; Khan, M. S.; Singh, P.; Kumar, R.; Singh, R. N.; Kumar, A.; Singh, H.V. Bacterial ACC deaminase: Insights into enzymology, biochemistry, genetics, and potential role in amelioration of environmental stress in crop plants. Front Microbiol 2023, 14, 1132770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Aloo, B. N.; Dessureault-Rompré, J.; Tripathi, V.; Nyongesa, B. O.; Were, B. A. Signaling and crosstalk of rhizobacterial and plant hormones that mediate abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Front Microbiol 2023, 14, 1171104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pieterse, C. M. J.; Zamioudis, C.; Berendsen, R. L.; Weller, D. M.; Van Wees, S. C. M.; Bakker, P. A. H. M. Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annl Rev Phytopathol 2014, 52, 347–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Renganathan, P.; Gaysina, L. A.; Rueda-Puente, E. O. Microbial biofertilizers for salinity stress mitigation in hydroponic systems. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2025, 47(12), 1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Abou Jaoudé, R.; Luziatelli, F.; Ficca, A. G.; Ruzzi, M. Effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria synthetic consortium on growth, yield, and metabolic profile of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) grown under suboptimal nutrient regime. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yacoub, A.; Renault, D.; Haidar, R.; Boulisset, F.; Letousey, P.; Guyoneaud, R.; Attard, E.; Rey, P. Impact of the biocontrol product, Esquive® WP, on the indigenous grapevine wood microbiome after a 6-year application period. J Fungi 2024, 10, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Merchant, N.; Lyons, E.; Goff, S.; Vaughn, M.; Ware, D.; Micklos, D.; Antin, P. The iPlant collaborative: cyberinfrastructure for enabling data to discovery for the life sciences. PLoS Biol 2016, 14, e1002342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Williams, J. CyVerse for reproducible research: RNA-seq analysis. In Methods in Molecular Biology; Humana Press Inc.: New York, NY; Springer US, 2022; Vol. 2443, pp. pp 57–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Peri, S.; Roberts, S.; Kreko, I. R.; McHan, L. B.; Naron, A.; Ram, A.; Murphy, R.L.; Lyons, E.; Gregory, B.D.; Devisetty, U.K.; Nelson, A.D. Read mapping and transcript assembly: a scalable and high-throughput workflow for the processing and analysis of ribonucleic acid sequencing data. Front Genet 2020, 10, 1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, D.; Paggi, J. M.; Park, C.; Bennett, C.; Salzberg, S. L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat Biotechnol 2019, 37, 907–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Love, M. I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Thimm, O.; Bläsing, O.; Gibon, Y.; Nagel, A.; Meyer, S.; Krüger, P.; Selbig, J.; Müller, L.A.; Rhee, S.Y.; Stitt, M. MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J 2004, 37(6), 914–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Nouri, M. Z.; Moumeni, A.; Komatsu, S. Abiotic stresses: Insight into gene regulation and protein expression in photosynthetic pathways of plants. Int J Mol Sci 2015, 16, 20392–20416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ahmed, W.; Wang, Y.; Ji, W.; Liu, S.; Zhou, S.; Pan, J.; Pan, J.; Li, Z.; Wang, F.; Wang, X. Unraveling the mechanism of the endophytic bacterial strain pseudomonas oryzihabitans GDW1 in enhancing tomato plant growth through modulation of the host transcriptome and bacteriome. Int J Mol Sci 2025, 26, 1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. IALR632 promoted lettuce plant growth in NFT units. A: Shoot fresh weight (FW) at 14 days; B: Shoot and root FW at 21 days; C: Shoot and root dry weight (DW) at 21 days; and D: SPAD values at 21 days. Asterisks (*, ***) indicate significant differences from the control at p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively.
Figure 1. IALR632 promoted lettuce plant growth in NFT units. A: Shoot fresh weight (FW) at 14 days; B: Shoot and root FW at 21 days; C: Shoot and root dry weight (DW) at 21 days; and D: SPAD values at 21 days. Asterisks (*, ***) indicate significant differences from the control at p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively.
Preprints 200662 g001
Figure 2. Venn diagrams of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (Padj < 0.01) for lettuce (Lactuca sativa cv. Green Oakleaf). Plants had been inoculated with IALR632 and compared with non-inoculated control for gene expression at 4, 10, and 15 days after transplanting (DAT). A: Unique and common up-regulated genes; B: Number of down-regulated genes at 4, 10, and 15 DAT.
Figure 2. Venn diagrams of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (Padj < 0.01) for lettuce (Lactuca sativa cv. Green Oakleaf). Plants had been inoculated with IALR632 and compared with non-inoculated control for gene expression at 4, 10, and 15 days after transplanting (DAT). A: Unique and common up-regulated genes; B: Number of down-regulated genes at 4, 10, and 15 DAT.
Preprints 200662 g002
Figure 3. Overview of metabolic changes in lettuce leaves at 10 days (A) and 15 days (B) after transplanting, visualized with MapMan. Genes significantly up-regulated in bacteria treated leaves are shown as red squares while down-regulated genes are shown as blue squares. Scale bars display log2-fold changes, and only significant differences are displayed. OPP: oxidative pentose phosphate pathway; TCA: tricarboxylic acid cycle.
Figure 3. Overview of metabolic changes in lettuce leaves at 10 days (A) and 15 days (B) after transplanting, visualized with MapMan. Genes significantly up-regulated in bacteria treated leaves are shown as red squares while down-regulated genes are shown as blue squares. Scale bars display log2-fold changes, and only significant differences are displayed. OPP: oxidative pentose phosphate pathway; TCA: tricarboxylic acid cycle.
Preprints 200662 g003
Figure 4. Differential expressions of top up-regulated Gene Ontology (GO) Biological Process (BP_Direct) terms in lettuce (Lactuca sativa cv. Green Oakleaf) at 10 days (A) and 15 days (B) after transplanting. The stacked bar chart shows the number of up-regulated genes annotated to each BP_Direct term, along with the corresponding down-regulated genes associated with the same terms. GO terms were selected based on annotation frequency, not statistical enrichment. Gene expression was assessed relative to non-inoculated control plants, highlighting biological processes influenced by inoculation with the growth-promoting bacterial strain IALR632.
Figure 4. Differential expressions of top up-regulated Gene Ontology (GO) Biological Process (BP_Direct) terms in lettuce (Lactuca sativa cv. Green Oakleaf) at 10 days (A) and 15 days (B) after transplanting. The stacked bar chart shows the number of up-regulated genes annotated to each BP_Direct term, along with the corresponding down-regulated genes associated with the same terms. GO terms were selected based on annotation frequency, not statistical enrichment. Gene expression was assessed relative to non-inoculated control plants, highlighting biological processes influenced by inoculation with the growth-promoting bacterial strain IALR632.
Preprints 200662 g004
Figure 5. Changes of bacterial community diversities after bacterial inoculation. A: Shannon and Chao1 indices; B: PCoA analyses; C: Anosim analysis; D and E: NMDS analysis. .
Figure 5. Changes of bacterial community diversities after bacterial inoculation. A: Shannon and Chao1 indices; B: PCoA analyses; C: Anosim analysis; D and E: NMDS analysis. .
Preprints 200662 g005
Figure 6. Relative abundance of Phyla and genera in bacterial treated group and the control group. A: Phylum relative abundance. B: Genus relative abundance.
Figure 6. Relative abundance of Phyla and genera in bacterial treated group and the control group. A: Phylum relative abundance. B: Genus relative abundance.
Preprints 200662 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated