This section presents the profiles of women victims of violence, the correlations between displacement and violence intensity, the lived experience of violence by IDW, and finally their resilience capacity facing the trauma suffered.
3.2. Escalation and Temporal Intensification of Violence
The IDW surveyed on official sites and in unarranged peripheral neighborhoods originate from about one hundred villages in the Sourou and Bankuy regions. However, the vast majority come from Djédougou or Guédougou, Gassan, Sanaba, and Douroula and underwent forced displacement from 2017 to 2023. The peak of forced displacement occurred in 2022 followed by a decline in 2023. All IDW, 100%, justify their displacement by violence and ultimatums from terrorist armed groups. Communities received short deadlines of 24 hours or 3 days to evacuate the village at risk of execution for disobedience.
Table 4, represented in
Figure 1, determines the Pearson relationship between certain temporal variables and types of violence. Here, correlation is significant with two variable types (physical and psychological). The sample size (N) for the year of displacement variable is 1,015 IDW. It emerges from
Figure 1 that the correlation is statistically significant between physical and psychological violence. Indeed, there is a significant positive correlation (r = 0.0738, p = 0.0186) between year of displacement and physical violence. These data reveal that the more recent the displacement, the greater the probability and intensity of physical violence increases, or inversely. This correlation is significant between year of displacement of IDW and psychological violence (r = 0.072, p = 0.0219). However, there is a significant negative correlation (r = -0.0498, p = 0.1126) between year of displacement and social violence (exclusion, rejection). This significance suggests that the more recent the year of displacement, the less they feel rejected or socially excluded, or inversely. These data allow us to affirm that over the years, IDW are perceived positively by the host population.
In addition to these types of violence,
Table 4 allows us to affirm that correlations between year of displacement and sexual violence (r = -0.0172, p = 0.5834), verbal (r = 0.0198, p = 0.5285), and economic (r = 0.0103, p = 0.7432) are not statistically significant because p-values are greater than 0.05.
Table 5 above reveals that there is a moderate significant positive correlation between physical violence and psychological violence (r = 0.5006). Those who are victims of physical violence tend to suffer verbal violence (r = 0.4297). Persons suffering from physical violence are also victims of social exclusion.
Sophisticated terror strategy: The lived experience of violence by women
These studies examine violence experienced by IDW before, during, and after displacement. Violence suffered by most IDW before forced displacement included deprivation of liberty and imposition of strict laws to govern behaviours according to Islamic precepts. Under the control of terrorist armed groups in their villages of origin, inhabitants were under threat of execution, beatings, prohibitions against playing music, consuming millet beer, playing soccer, etc. Physical violence included imposition of the hijab or black robes to cover their entire bodies. Those who did not respect these dress codes were beaten, humiliated, raped before their spouses.
However, most atrocities were committed during attacks and forced displacement.
Table 6 indicates that 46.3% of IDW lost at least one family member (spouse, children, brothers, sisters, brother-in-law, father-in-law) or community member during attacks. Men were shot in the head, others had throats slit, others were thrown into wells or burned alive. Sometimes, men were gathered in a single location to be executed in masse before women and children, as was the case with residents of the village of Guédougou. In this context of extreme violence, some families were decimated. Women’s narratives were marked by silence, tears, bitter laughter, interjections. Men, regardless of age, were systematically targeted for killing. This “scorched earth” policy strategy aimed to deter any collaboration or enlistment of men in the Volunteers for the Defense of the Homeland (VDP) auxiliary force. Moreover, forcing women and children to witness the murder of their loved ones fit within an electro-shock and deterrence policy. This is the case of Respondent 17 who finds herself the sole survivor of her family in the city of Dédougou:
Me, in any case, I no longer know if I am human. I live today just to live. If you kill yourself, they will accuse you of having committed a crime. Otherwise, I prefer to be dead than alive to have peace. When our village was attacked, I lost twelve (12) members of my family the same day. I lost my husband, my children, and my husband’s brother. The terrorists’ targets were boys. They came one morning and killed most of the boys. When they attacked the village, my husband had already left with our son to go fishing in the river. They were killed. I did not even see their bodies. Currently, I live alone here.
In addition to this victim, Respondent 21 was instead forced with her children to witness her husband’s execution. Indeed, she recounts the lived experience of this day of atrocity in these terms:
I am from Koumbara. We were stopped and stripped by the terrorists during our flight from our village. Then, they slit my husband’s throat before my eyes and my children. They forced us to walk to reach where we wished to take refuge. At one point, they wanted to burn us alive. I was lost, desperate. I took the road on foot with my three children to Dédougou here.
Respondent 4 experienced similar violence. Indeed, she was instead forced to witness the slitting of her only son’s throat. Through her narrative, it emerges that victims also suffer moral torture and insults. Verbal constraint is exercised on them not to manifest their mourning and express their pain. It emerges from her words, the atrocity of violence in these terms:
I come from the village of Bao. My eldest son had his throat slit before my eyes because he refused to join them. He was killed on a Wednesday. I went mad, I cannot overcome this cruelty. I cried so loud that “those people” (referring to terrorists) came back to tell me to shut my mouth or they would burn me alive. I responded that they could kill me. They came back the following Friday, giving us an ultimatum to leave the village in the afternoon. They formally forbade us from going to Tougan which was the nearest village otherwise we all risked dying. I had lost reason with the loss of my only son who took care of me and his six sisters since their father’s death.
Unlike these violence victims, Respondent 4 from the village of Bouna was forced with her husband into infanticide and cannibalism. The extreme trauma of this day of violence is recounted by the victim in these words:
I come from Bouna. During our displacement here, we did not suffer violence. It was rather before we displaced... About three years ago, one afternoon, armed individuals came to our village. They told inhabitants to leave immediately. I was almost at term. My husband told me we could not keep pace with the others... We stayed and at 7 p.m. we started walking, a few steps from the house I started losing water. We returned to the house to give birth. We rested a bit and the next morning very early, when we were preparing to leave, they landed at our house, they asked us why we did not leave, that we did not receive the order to leave the village, no? My husband responded that we received it, but that we could not leave because I was at term and I just gave birth. They said nothing, but they went out to confer for a good while and one of them came back ordering my husband to take the baby, slit its throat, cut it into pieces, and cook it. Hmm, we were so shocked, devastated, it is inhuman. We begged them in vain. Oh Lord! I cried, my husband even was overwhelmed by the situation. He lost the power of speech, he could not even speak. The worst is that after cooking, they wanted to force us to eat the meat and soup of our baby (cries). It was like a bad dream yet it was real. In fear of being next, we started serving the soup (our baby’s flesh), the Defense and Security Forces arrived in time to prevent them from committing this ignominy. There were exchanges of gunfire, thank God our FDS prevailed and we got out unharmed (cries).
An analysis of this verbatim reveals trauma among women exposed to violence experienced during assassinations of their husbands and children. The execution of spouses, children, and acquaintances left deep mental scars in certain IDW. This trauma manifests through mental disorders, loss of speech, insomnia, repetitive nightmares, anxiety, flashbacks, and tears. Some end up feeling “crazy” or desperate to the point of considering suicide as an alternative to eradicating mental suffering.
Establishing family relationships with IDW highlights that certain categories are more affected than others. Indeed,
Table 7 indicates that the category of spouses (17.45%) and children (19.96%) constitutes 37.41% of human losses. This category represents an essential part of the family structure and the one with which IDW have a direct link. Brothers/Sisters constitute 25.90%, a quarter of human losses recorded during attacks and kidnappings. The parent’s category represents 21.94% and 14.75% of neighbours and acquaintances.
Spiritual resilience and post-traumatic psychological care.
Facing violence, IDW adopt several attitudes or self-protection mechanisms. These protection mechanisms vary from one actor to another.
Figure 2 indicates that 39.74% of women take refuge in prayer sessions as a therapeutic strategy. They depend largely on this type of spiritual support mechanism to manage stress and trauma related to extreme violence experienced. Faith and prayer function as a refuge and allow many victims to find inner peace and give meaning to tragic events. Women console themselves by placing their fate in God’s hands. Non-religious strategies such as silence (23.36%) and support from loved ones (17.48%) appear as protection mechanisms against violence. Silence indicates internalization of trauma, difficulty externalizing suffering, or the conviction that opening up to expose one’s resentments appears dangerous. Unlike this silence, those who confide in loved ones indicate the importance of immediate social capital in the healing process of inner wounds.
A small percentage of women resort to authorities, only 15.2%. This situation is due to unfamiliarity with institutions empowered to emotionally support victims of psychological violence. Only 4.22% resort to strategies such as throwing themselves into work and recourse to traditional remedies. Indeed, collecting gravel and dead wood in forests appears as therapy for women. The occupation allows drowning negative thoughts (suicidal thoughts) and overcoming the pain of tragic events experienced. Another strategy used by women victims of violence is the use of decoctions (herbal teas, bark, etc.) to rid themselves of lost souls of their loved ones who haunt them. Facing mental trauma and illnesses, these strategies appear as an alternative to modern medicine which requires more financial means.
Indeed, from semi-structured interviews, it emerges that IDW rarely resort to psychologists for accompaniment in healing psychological wounds. However, certain IDW installed on official sites benefit from accompaniment and follow-up by psychologists. Awareness sessions are organized by social action agents, nurses, and NGOs (Red Cross, Médecins Sans Frontières, or INTERSOS). Care consists of conducting home visits to victims by performing psychological exercises, educational awareness sessions, discussions, spiritual and emotional support. This appears in the words of Respondent 7 (Psychologist at an NGO) in these terms:
Persons who are victims of terrorism need awareness, psycho-education, individual interviews, relaxation therapy. With these different aids, the individual manages to overcome their disorders and also adapt to a new way of life.
This also emerges from the words of Respondent 32: “Once, NGO agents came to talk with us to encourage us. This helps us forget our fears and our traumas.” Respondents recognize free care for psychological health problems. However, a vast majority of IDW affirm not resorting to or consulting psychologists made available to them in housing camps. Contrary to this information, NGOs like Médecins Sans Frontières affirm receiving around 30 to 40 persons per week with post-traumatic disorders for complete care. This free care is mentioned by Respondent 3 (agent of a humanitarian NGO) in these words:
Care for persons who are victims of terrorism is free. After receiving them, we make a diagnosis to know the state and intensity of the harm they suffer. We also make a follow-up program for the person and a care plan for the sick person.
A comparative analysis of verbatim from humanitarian workers and women victims of trauma reveals that IDW are unaware of the existence of free psychological care. Indeed, they announce financial difficulties as a barrier to consulting a psychologist. For other categories, their priority is ensuring children have food so as not to die of hunger. The latter are convinced that these psychological consultations will not bring back loved ones lost in attacks.