Submitted:
10 April 2026
Posted:
14 April 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
Introduction
1. Physics-Informed Descriptor Engineering
1.1. Descriptor Engineering Strategies
1.2. Hybrid Textural-Optimization and Outlier-Aware Predictive Modeling
1.3. Ensemble Interaction Mapping and Node-Affinity Hierarchies
2. High-Throughput Screening and Universal Property Prediction
2.1. High-Throughput Screening and Discovery
2.2. Universal Property Prediction and Isotherm Generalization
2.3. Property-Driven ML Applications
3. Model Interpretability and Thermodynamic Mapping
3.1. Model Interpretability and Physical Insight
3.2. Ensemble-Averaged Thermodynamics and Potential Energy Surface (PES) Mapping
4. Molecular Transport and Multicomponent Separation Mechanisms
4.1. Molecular-Level Transport and Adsorption Mechanisms
4.2. Multicomponent Gas Separation and Structural Design Strategies
5. Active-Site and Electronic Structure Engineering
5.1. Lewis Acid-Base Site Engineering and Catalytic Kinetics
5.2. Electronic Property Modulation and Electrocatalytic Selectivity
5.3. Synergistic Site Engineering and Composite Pore Modulation
6. Multi-Objective Inverse Design and Generative MOF Discovery
6.1. Multi-Objective Inverse Design and Chemical Subspace Exploration
7. Multiscale Generative Design and Process-Oriented Optimization
7.1. Process-Integrated Generative Design and Material Optimization
Conclusions
| Study Focus | Primary ML Algorithm(s) | Key Descriptor(s) | Predictive Performance (R2) | Core Scientific Insight |
| Pore Energy Mapping | XGBoost | Energy-based RDFs & Surface Histograms | > 0.81 CO2 > 0.97 N2 | Spatially aware energy RDFs resolve the "intermediate pressure bottleneck" in isotherms. |
| Composite Modulation | CNN (Inception) | Geometric + Chemical (Ionic Liquids) | ≈ 0.90 | Ionic liquids can act as synergistic sites, creating new potential energy minima for CO2. |
| Kinetic Transport | DeepPot-SE (MLP) | Atomic coordinates (Flexible) | 0.9916 (Energy) | Framework flexibility accelerates CO2 diffusivity by 10x compared to rigid models. |
| Generative Design | MOFGPT (Transformer) | MOFid (NLP-based strings) | 35–100% Validity | Reinforcement learning effectively navigates the "extreme tail" of property distributions. |
| Process-Level Design | MOF-NET (ANN) | Word Embeddings of Building Blocks | Elite purity/recovery | Optimal design bifurcates into small-pore exclusion vs. large-pore binding. |
| Mixed Matrix Membranes | Stacking Ensemble | Polymer FFV + MOF PLD/LCD | 0.96 | A "10x permeability rule" exists where filler must exceed polymer permeability for gain. |
| Experimental Benchmarking | Stacking (RF/XGB/MLP) | Textural (BET) + Operational (P, T) | 0.9833 | Identified a metal-affinity hierarchy where Mg and Cu centers provide superior binding sites. |
| Hybrid Optimization | LSSVM-GO | Textural + Operational | 0.9798 | Growth Optimization (GO) significantly reduces prediction errors in high-uptake regimes. |
| Multicomponent Separation | Random Forest | Structural + Chemical Descriptors | 0.922 (R%) | MOF renderability is optimized within a specific density window of 0.5–1.7 g/cm³. |
| Electrocatalytic Selectivity | Gradient Boosting (GBR) | Electronic (EA, chi, d-band) | 0.9998 | Catalytic activity is primarily governed by electron affinity and electronegativity. |
| Universal Zeolite Prediction | GBT / RF / DL | Si/Al Ratio + Cation type | 0.936 | Provides a universal framework without case-specific parameter fitting required by Langmuir models. |
References
- Ozkan, M.A., Amir-Ali & Coley, William & Shang, Ruoxu & Ma, Yi, Progress in carbon dioxide capture materials for deep decarbonization. Chem. 8. 141-173. 2022. [CrossRef]
- Carrascal-Hernández, D.C.G.-T., C.D.; Mendez-Lopez, M.; Insuasty, D.; García-Freites, S.; Sanjuan, M.; Márquez, E, CO₂ Capture: A Comprehensive Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Scalable Materials and Sustainable Solutions. . Molecules 2025, 30, 563, 2025. [CrossRef]
- Shreya Mahajan, M.L., Recent progress in metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) for CO2 capture at different pressures. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering,, 2022. [CrossRef]
- Sarkisov, Z.D.a.L., Multi-Scale Computational Design of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Carbon Capture Using Machine Learning and Multi-Objective Optimization. Chemistry of Materials 2024 36 (19), 9806-9821, 2024. [CrossRef]
- Hussin, F.N., Siti Aqilah & Mohamed Hatta, Nur Syahirah & Aroua, Mohamed & Mazari, Shaukat Ali, A systematic review of machine learning approaches in carbon capture applications. . Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2023. [CrossRef]
- François-Xavier Coudert, Recent advances in stimuli-responsive framework materials: Understanding their response and searching for materials with targeted behavior. Coordination Chemistry Reviews,, 2025. Volume 539. [CrossRef]
- Fathalian, F.A., Sepehr & Ghaemi, Ahad & Hemmati, Alireza, Intelligent prediction models based on machine learning for CO2 capture performance by graphene oxide-based adsorbents. . Scientific Reports. 12. 21507., 2022. [CrossRef]
- Z. Deng, L.S., Engineering machine learning features to predict adsorption of carbon dioxide and nitrogen in metal–organic frameworks. J. Phys. Chem. C (2024), 2024. [CrossRef]
- J. Zuo, F.S., Z. Qu, C. Yang, L. Xie, Y. Zhang, X. Li, J. Li, Unraveling the coupling effect of micropore confinement and functional sites of carbon-based adsorbents on flue gas CO₂ adsorption: A machine learning study based on multi-scale simulations. Carbon Capture Sci. Technol. (2025). , 2025. [CrossRef]
- Y. Teng, G.S., Interpretable machine learning for materials discovery: Predicting CO₂ adsorption properties of metal–organic frameworks. 2024. [CrossRef]
- P.O. Longe, S.D., M. Mehrad, D.A. Wood, , Robust machine-learning model for prediction of carbon dioxide adsorption on metal–organic frameworks. J. Alloys Compd. (2024), 2024. [CrossRef]
- Z. Iyiola, E.T.B., N.J. Okeke, K. Sanni, P. Longe, , Carbon capture using metal-organic frameworks (MOFs): Novel custom ensemble learning models for prediction of CO₂ adsorption. Processes, 2025. [CrossRef]
- H. Wan, Y.F., M. Hu, S. Guo, Z. Sui, X. Huang, Z. Liu, Y. Zhao, H. Liang, Y. Wu, H. Gao, and Z. Qiao, Interpretable machine learning and big data mining to predict the CO₂ separation in polymer–MOF mixed matrix membranes. Adv. Sci. (2024), 2024. [CrossRef]
- S. Achour, Z.H., ML-driven models for predicting CO₂ uptake in metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), . Can. J. Chem. Eng. (2024). 2024. [CrossRef]
- Kirtil, E., Universal prediction of CO₂ adsorption on zeolites using machine learning: A comparative analysis with Langmuir isotherm models. ChemEngineering 2025. [CrossRef]
- E.V. Kotov, J.S., G. Logabiraman, H. Dhall, M. Chandna, P. Madan, V. Sharma, Carbon capture and storage optimization with machine learning using an ANN model. E3S Web Conf. 588 (2024) 01003, 2024. [CrossRef]
- B. Zheng, G.X.G., C. dos Santos, R.N.B. Ferreira, M. Steiner, B. Luan, Simulating CO₂ diffusivity in rigid and flexible Mg-MOF-74 with machine-learning force fields. APL Mach. Learn. 2 (2024) 026115, 2024. [CrossRef]
- Yunsung Lim, H.P., Aron Walsh, Jihan Kim,, Accelerating CO2 direct air capture screening for metal-organic frameworks with a transferable machine learning force field,. Matter, 2025. [CrossRef]
- Tayfuroglu O, K.S., Modeling CO2 adsorption in flexible MOFs with open metal sites via fragment-based neural network potentials. . . J Chem Phys. 2025 Aug 7;163(5):054704., 2025. [CrossRef]
- Y. Zhou, S.J., S. He, W. Fan, L. Zan, L. Zhou, X. Ji, G. He, Machine-learning-assisted high-throughput screening of metal–organic frameworks for CO₂ separation from CO₂-rich natural gas. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. (2024). , 2024.
- X. Bai, Y.L., Y. Xie, Q. Chen, X. Zhang, J.-R. Li, High-throughput screening of CO₂ cycloaddition MOF catalyst with an explainable machine learning model. Green Energy Environ. (2024), 2024. [CrossRef]
- G. Xing, S.L., G. Sun, J.-Y. Liu, , Modification of metals and ligands in two-dimensional conjugated metal–organic frameworks for CO₂ electroreduction: A combined DFT and machine learning study. SSRN Electron. J. (2024). , 2024. [CrossRef]
- Mengjia Sheng, X.Z., Hongye Cheng, Zhen Song, Zhiwen Qi,, Multi-criteria computational screening of [BMIM][DCA]@MOF composites for CO2 capture,. Green Chemical Engineering,, 2025. [CrossRef]
- Park, H., et al., Inverse design of metal–organic frameworks for direct air capture of CO2via deep reinforcement learning. Digital Discovery, 2024. 3(4): p. 728-741. [CrossRef]
- Srivathsan Badrinarayanan, R.M., Akshay Antony, Radheesh Sharma Meda, and Amir Barati Farimani, MOFGPT: Generative Design of Metal–Organic Frameworks using Language Models. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2025 65 (17), 9049-9060, 2025. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).