Submitted:
11 February 2026
Posted:
12 February 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Digital transformation in public institutions is increasingly understood as a socio-technical and organizational process rather than a purely technological upgrade. This study presents the design of an ICT-based digital transformation roadmap aimed at improving administrative efficiency and citizen service delivery in a municipal public utility in Ecuador. A mixed-methods diagnostic approach was adopted, combining qualitative evidence from direct observation and a semi-structured interview with the head of the IT department, and quantitative data from a structured online survey administered to citizens. Baseline Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) were established using institutional records, service logs, and workflow analysis conducted over a three-month diagnostic window. Post-implementation KPI values are explicitly treated as {ex ante} projections, derived from process redesign analysis, benchmarking with comparable public utilities, and scenario-based assumptions, rather than empirically observed outcomes. The empirical results demonstrate high citizen readiness and acceptance of proposed digital services, including remote service portals, electronic invoicing, and automated support channels. The projected operational improvements—such as reductions in response and administrative processing times and increased digital transaction rates—are therefore presented as expected performance scenarios. A risk and alternative scenario analysis further examines how organizational constraints, resource availability, governance capacity, and change-management factors may moderate these outcomes. The study contributes a transparent and replicable framework for diagnosing digital readiness and planning ICT-driven transformation initiatives in resource-constrained public utilities, while emphasizing the need for future longitudinal validation using post-implementation data.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Data Collection Techniques
3.3. Population and Sampling
3.4. Instrument and Construct Definition
3.4.1. Content Validity
3.5. Application of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
| KPI Name | Description and Objective | Formula / Measurement Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Average Response Time (ART) | Measures the speed with which citizen requests are managed, from receipt to resolution. Indicates the efficiency of service workflows and the impact of automation on turnaround time. |
|
| Administrative Processing Time (APT) | Evaluates the reduction in time required to complete administrative procedures through the digitalization of documents and automation of internal approvals. |
|
| Digital Transaction Rate (DTR) | Assesses the increase in the number of digital transactions (payments, service requests, online claims) performed by users without in-person assistance. Reflects citizen adoption of digital channels. |
|
| Automated Task Ratio (ATR) | Quantifies the proportion of internal processes automated by ICT tools, reducing manual workload and potential human error. |
|
| Citizen Satisfaction Index (CSI) | Evaluates the perception and satisfaction level of users regarding the digital services implemented. Based on pre- and post-implementation survey scores. |
|
3.5.1. KPI Measurement Methods and Data Sources
4. Results
4.1. Baseline Status of Technological Resources Used in Administrative Processes
Hardware and Connectivity.
Business Software Landscape.
Process Automation Coverage.
Human Capabilities and Change Readiness.
| Topic | Key finding |
|---|---|
| End-user devices | 32 desktops; age ∼7 years; performance constraints expected for new apps. |
| Connectivity | Internet service rated as good/stable for core operations. |
| Peripherals | Printers heavily used; scanners used as needed; overall good condition. |
| ERP in use | ERP “CABILDO” in production; ease of use reported; monitor upgrade paths. |
| Automation coverage | Automated: collection, HR, inventory, customer DB, accounting. Gaps: customer service & technical ops. |
| Skills & training | Staff proficiency: intermediate; no active upskilling program despite identified gaps. |
| Adoption attitude | Generally positive; localized resistance tied to training deficits. |
Compact SWOT at Baseline.
| STRENGTHS | OPPORTUNITIES |
|---|---|
|
|
| WEAKNESSES | THREATS |
|
|
4.2. Integrated ICT Proposal to Optimize Administrative and Operational Management
Infrastructure Refresh (3–6 months).
Case and CRM System for Citizen Service Requests (6–12 months).

Web-Based Virtual Office (Remote Service Portal) and Mobile App (12–18 months).

Virtual Agent/Chatbot for Tier-1 Support (6–9 months).

Mobile Meter-Reading and Field Apps (rolling deployment).
e-Invoicing and Digital Receipts (3–6 months).

Continuous Training and Change Management (transversal, 12 months).
| Problem | Solution | Implementation details |
|---|---|---|
| Aging devices; uneven peripherals | Infrastructure refresh | Standard image; warranty SLAs; endpoint protection; staged rollout |
| Manual request handling; low visibility | Case/CRM | Multichannel intake; auto-routing; SLAs; dashboards; ERP integration |
| Limited 24/7 access | Virtual Office + Mobile | Self-service; payments; status tracking; SSO; ERP/payment/CRM integration |
| High Tier-1 load | Virtual agent | FAQ flows; escalation to agents; containment/SAT monitoring |
| Paper meter-reading | Field app | Routes; GPS/OCR; anomaly flags; online/offline; billing integration |
| Low spatial awareness | GIS | Asset layers; incidents; field capture; linkage to CRM and ops data |
| Paper invoicing | e-Invoicing | Certified provider; digital delivery; reconciliation dashboards |
| Skills/resistance | Training & change | Role-based curricula; super-users; adoption KPIs; comms plan |
Cybersecurity and Data Protection Governance (transversal, 6–12 months).
- Access control and identity management: Role-based access control (RBAC) implemented within the ERP system and CRM platform, combined with strong password policies and multi-factor authentication where supported.
- Secure communications and hosting: Use of HTTPS/TLS encryption for all web-based services; deployment on secure cloud or on-premise environments with firewall protection (e.g., UFW or pfSense).
- Data backup and recovery: Automated daily backups using tools such as Veeam Backup, Bacula, or cloud-native backup services, with periodic restore testing.
- Endpoint protection: Installation of basic endpoint security solutions (e.g., Microsoft Defender, Sophos Endpoint) on all workstations.
- Policy and regulatory compliance: Definition of internal data protection and information security policies aligned with national personal data protection regulations, including data minimization, purpose limitation, consent, and controlled data retention.
- Staff awareness and procedures: Short cybersecurity awareness training sessions focused on phishing prevention, secure password usage, and proper handling of citizen data.
4.3. Performance Analysis Using KPIs
4.3.1. Average Response Time to Requests (KPI 1)
Current Situation (Before Digitalization).
Expected Situation (After ICT Implementation).
- Reduction of the average response time from 48 hours to 12 hours for general requests.
- Centralized management of cases through a CRM that automatically routes requests to responsible departments.
- 24/7 service availability via Virtual Office and mobile applications.
- Automatic prioritization of technical requests based on urgency and geographic location.
- Real-time ticket tracking by citizens through unique identifiers.
- Reduction of repetitive administrative workloads, allowing staff to focus on value-added activities.
4.3.2. Administrative Processing Time (KPI 2)
Current Situation (Before Digitalization).
- Physical documentation: Most processes require manual signatures, printing, and filing, slowing down workflows and generating document backlogs.
- High dependence on in-person procedures: Citizens must visit offices to submit or collect documents, which increases waiting times and saturation at customer service desks.
- Lack of automation: Absence of an integrated digital system to manage and monitor administrative workflows leads to data duplication, loss of records, and human error.
- Heavy operational workload: Staff must manually process requests and paperwork, reducing their capacity to focus on strategic tasks.
- Limited traceability: Citizens cannot track the status of their requests online, resulting in repeated calls or visits for updates.
Expected Situation (After ICT Implementation).
- Reduction of the average processing time from 72 hours to 24 hours.
- Full digitalization of administrative documents through a document management platform, eliminating physical paperwork.
- Deployment of a 24/7 virtual service portal allowing citizens to complete procedures online without visiting the offices.
- Integration with the existing ERP system (“CABILDO”) to synchronize records, avoid duplication, and improve information traceability.
- Optimization of staff workload by automating repetitive validation and approval tasks.
- Online real-time tracking of the progress of administrative procedures via web or mobile app, eliminating unnecessary calls or visits.
4.3.3. Number of Digital Transactions (KPI 3)
Current Situation (Before Digitalization).
- High dependency on physical presence: Most payments and service requests were processed directly at customer service offices, creating long queues and service congestion.
- Absence of a unified platform: The organization did not have a Virtual Office or mobile application capable of centralizing payments, requests, and complaint management.
- Limited digital literacy among users: A portion of citizens preferred traditional channels due to unfamiliarity with digital tools.
- Manual reconciliation: Payment and billing records were processed separately in different systems, increasing the administrative workload and reconciliation errors.
Expected Situation (After ICT Implementation).
- Decentralization of administrative services: Over 80% of processes will be available online, reducing the pressure on physical service offices.
- Availability of a self-service portal: Users will be able to make inquiries, payments, and claims directly through digital channels without visiting the utility offices.
- Online payment integration: Payment gateways (e.g., national providers compatible with ERP systems) will enable real-time billing and automatic confirmation of payments.
- Enhanced citizen confidence: Awareness and education campaigns will promote the use of digital tools and ensure inclusiveness in technology adoption.
4.3.4. Citizen Satisfaction with the Digitalization of Services (KPI 4)
Response Distribution Analysis.
Descriptive Statistics and Confidence Intervals.
Summary of Findings.
5. Discussion
5.1. Impact of Digital Transformation on Administrative Efficiency
5.2. Risk Analysis and Alternative Implementation Scenarios
5.3. Comparative Analysis with Similar Public Utilities
5.4. Theoretical Implications
5.5. Practical Implications
5.6. Governance Mechanisms for Transparency, Accountability, and Trust
- 1.
- Traceability and auditability are strengthened through the CRM-based case management system, which records timestamps, responsible units, service-level agreements, and resolution outcomes for each request. This creates auditable service histories that support internal accountability and external oversight.
- 2.
- Complaint-resolution loops are formalized by integrating citizen feedback and service closure confirmation into the CRM workflow, ensuring that unresolved or delayed cases are systematically escalated and monitored.
- 3.
- Data governance and cybersecurity practices—such as role-based access control, encrypted communications, backup procedures, and data retention policies—contribute to institutional reliability and protection of personal information, which are essential preconditions for trust in digital public services.
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Naccari Carlizzi, D. Public Administration Reengineered Applying AI Models Towards Precision Governance. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 2025, Vol. 880, 61–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saeedikiya, M.; Salunke, S.; Kowalkiewicz, M. The nexus of digital transformation and innovation: A multilevel framework and research agenda. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge 2025, 10, 100640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, S.; Hur, J.; Kim, D. Bridging trust in AI and its adoption: The role of organizational support in AI chatbot implementation in Korean government agencies. Government Information Quarterly 2025, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vesolovska, M.; Karkovska, V.; Duma, O. Artificial intelligence in public administration: how the emotional intelligence of civil servants influences its effective implementation. Administratie Si Management Public 2025, 2025, 27–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Criado, J.I. Digital Public Administration in Latin America: Digitalization, Public Innovation, and the Future of Technologies in the Public Sector. Emerald Handbook of Public Administration in Latin America 2021, 343–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prieto, E.; Galarza, I.; Guevara, A.; Sanchez, S.; Calderón, R. Governance Model for Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector of Guayaquil, Ecuador, 2024. Journal of Ecohumanism 2024, 3, 12850–12859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kesar, B.; Joseph, S. Navigating the digital wave: equipping public officials for technology-driven governance. Digital Competency Development for Public Officials Adapting New Technologies in Public Services 2025, 251–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Febiri, F.; Gariba, M.; Hub, M.; Provaznikova, R. The synergy between human factors, public digitalization and public administration in the European context. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 2024, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassani, S.; Babazadeh Sangar, A. Digital transformation of Tabriz, Iran by IoT adoption. Information Development 2024, 42, 511–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, F.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, M.; Guo, D. How does digital transformation promote residents’ consumption upgrading? - Evidence from China’s supply and demand restructuring. Habitat International 2026, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sagala, G.H.; Őri, D. Exploring the Strategy of E-Government Inclusion in Developing Countries. In Proceedings of the Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective; KŐ, A., Buccafurri, F., Kotsis, G., Tjoa, A.M., Khalil, I., Eds.; Cham, 2026; pp. 72–87. [Google Scholar]
- Nyadzi, B.; Morris, J. E-Government and Public Trust in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Public Administration 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saeed, M.; Abdulmuhsin, A.; Dajani, D. From novelty to necessity: Understanding CRM-driven service robot adoption in Iraqi restaurants through UTAUT3. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge 2026, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juita, R.; Inan, D.; Santoso, B. Digital market adoption by underserved MSMEs in developing countries: Mediation and moderation by self-efficacy and trust. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights 2026, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carlsson, F.; Lindström, N.; Sandberg, J. Digital Transformation Through Collective Social Action - How Resource Disparities Can be Leveraged in Inter-municipal Collaboration. Proceedings of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2026, Vol. 15944, 34–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amade, M.; Mamede, H.; Reis, L.; Branco, F. Cybersecurity in the Digital Transformation of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Systematic Review of Frameworks and Challenges in Developing Countries with a Focus on Mozambique. Proceedings of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 2026, Vol. 1717, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Twabu, K.; Nakene-Mginqi, M. Blockchain smart contract efficiency as a use case for higher learning institutions to easily access student information with home affairs as well as the department of higher education. Multidisciplinary Reviews 2026, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, B.; Yu, B. The nonlinear effects of e-government on total-factor carbon emission efficiency in 136 countries. In Environment Development and Sustainability; 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernández Sampieri, R.; Fernández Collado, C.; Baptista Lucio, P. Metodología de la investigación, 6th ed.; McGraw-Hill Education: México D.F., México, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Freshworks Inc. Freshdesk: Cloud-Based Customer Support Software. 2025. Available online: https://www.freshworks.com/freshdesk/ (accessed on 3 February 2026).
- Interagua. Agencia Virtual - Interagua, 2026. Accessed. 3 February 2026.
- EPMAPS - Agua de Quito. Oficina Virtual - Empresa Pública Metropolitana de Agua Potable y Saneamiento. Accessed. 3 February 2026.
- Cuenca, J.; Ortega, J. Ingreso de lecturas de consumo de agua potable en EMAPAL-Azogues, a traves de dispositivos móviles. Revista Científica y Tecnológica UPSE (RCTU) 2017, 4, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paredes-Parada, W.; Del Pozo, F.; García González, S.E.; Ndea, C. Good ICT Practices for the Integral Development of Ecuadorian Universities. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 2021, Vol. 1277, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez-Pérez, S.; Rodríguez-Abitia, G. A Roadmap for Digital Transformation of Latin American Universities. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology 2021, 19–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| 1 | Source: interview with the head of IT services and in-situ observation. |
| 2 | Device count and obsolescence risk. |



| Construct | Items | Cronbach’s |
|---|---|---|
| ICT Infrastructure Improvement | Q1–Q2 | 0.78 |
| Process Automation Perception | Q3–Q4 | 0.81 |
| Digital Self-Service Adoption | Q5–Q6 | 0.84 |
| Chatbot Acceptance | Q7–Q8 | 0.79 |
| KPI | Measurement Method | Data Source |
|---|---|---|
| Average Response Time (ART) | Mean time between request submission and resolution, calculated from operational timestamps. | Manual service logs, internal administrative records, direct observation, and semi-structured interview with the head of the IT department. |
| Administrative Processing Time (APT) | Average duration required to complete administrative procedures from submission to closure. | Direct observation of workflows, institutional operational practices, and records supported by the ERP system. |
| Digital Transaction Rate (DTR) | Ratio of digitally processed transactions to total transactions during the baseline period. | Administrative reports, direct observation of service channels, and analysis of existing digital platforms. |
| Automated Task Ratio (ATR) | Proportion of administrative tasks fully automated by ICT tools. | Process mapping, system configuration review, and ERP functional analysis. |
| Citizen Satisfaction Index (CSI) | Mean satisfaction score measured using a five-point Likert scale. | Structured online survey administered to service users. |
| Indicator | Before Automation (Baseline) | Projected After ICT Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Average response time to requests | 48 hours | 12 hours |
| Requests managed in less than 24 hours | 30% | 85% |
| Automated requests | 10% | 80% |
| Main service channels | In-person and telephone | Digital (chatbot, mobile app, CRM) |
| Indicator | Before Automation (Baseline) | Projected After ICT Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Average administrative processing time | 72 hours | 24 hours |
| Digitalized administrative procedures | 20% | 90% |
| Users completing procedures online | 15% | 80% |
| Administrative workload level | High (manual processes) | Optimized (automated workflows) |
| Method for procedure inquiries | In-person or telephone | Digital (web portal, app, chatbot) |
| Indicator | Before Automation (Baseline) | Projected After ICT Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Share of digital transactions | 20% | 85% |
| Access channel for payments and requests | In-person at offices | Virtual Office and mobile app |
| Availability of online payment system | Not available | Fully integrated payment gateway |
| Administrative workload from manual processing | High | Significantly reduced |
| Citizen adoption of digital services | Low | High (with awareness campaigns) |
| Item | SD | D | N | A | SA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICT improves service quality | 2.1% | 3.4% | 6.5% | 41.0% | 47.0% |
| Digitalization speeds procedures | 3.2% | 6.1% | 12.0% | 24.7% | 54.0% |
| 24/7 digital services are necessary | 1.6% | 2.4% | 8.6% | 39.4% | 48.0% |
| Preference for electronic invoicing | 1.0% | 1.8% | 2.2% | 30.0% | 65.0% |
| Use of chatbots for inquiries | 4.7% | 9.2% | 38.8% | 27.3% | 20.0% |
| Indicator | Mean | SD | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service quality improvement | 4.31 | 0.78 | [4.23, 4.39] |
| Process acceleration | 4.02 | 0.89 | [3.93, 4.11] |
| Digital self-service adoption | 4.05 | 0.84 | [3.96, 4.13] |
| Chatbot acceptance | 3.62 | 0.91 | [3.53, 3.71] |
| Electronic invoicing preference | 4.68 | 0.61 | [4.62, 4.74] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.