Submitted:
11 February 2026
Posted:
11 February 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Population
2.2. FDG-PET/CT Protocol
2.3. Image Analysis
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. SUVmean and Blood Glucose
3.2. SUVmean and Age
3.3. SUVmean and Testicular Volume
3.4. Testicular Volume and Age
4. Discussion
Limitations
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Choi J, Chae Y, Kang BT, Lee S. An evaluation of the physiological uptake range of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in normal ovaries of seven dogs using positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Front Vet Sci. 2024 Feb 2;11:1343695.
- Olkowski C, Fernandes B, Griffiths GL, Lin F, Choyke PL. Preclinical Imaging of Prostate Cancer. Semin Nucl Med. 2023 Sep;53(5):644-662.
- Lee H, Hwang KH. Unexpected focal fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in main organs; pass through or pass by? World J Clin Cases. 2024 Apr 16;12(11):1885-1899.
- Blodgett TM, Fukui MB, Snyderman CH, et al. Combined PET-CT in the head and neck: part 1. Physiologic, altered physiologic, and artifactual FDG uptake. Radiographics. 2005 Jul-Aug;25(4):897-912.
- Narayanan P, Sahdev A. The role of 18F-FDG PET CT in common gynaecological malignancies. Br J Radiol. 2017 Nov;90(1079):20170283.
- Li T, Zhang J, Yan Y, Tan M, Chen Y. Applications of FAPI PET/CT in the diagnosis and treatment of breast and the most common gynecologic malignancies: a literature review. Front Oncol. 2024 Mar 5;14:1358070.
- Mori M, Fujioka T, Ichikawa R, et al. Comparison of 18F-fluorothymidine Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Patients with Breast Cancer. Tomography. 2022 Oct 11;8(5):2533-2546.
- Kitajima K, Nakamoto Y, Senda M, Onishi Y, Okizuka H, Sugimura K. Normal uptake of 18F-FDG in the testis: an assessment by PET/CT. Ann Nucl Med. 2007 Sep;21(7):405-10.
- Meij-de Vries A, Knol RJ, Lazarenko SV, Meijer RW, van der Plas EM, Heij HA. Uptake of (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose in the Healthy Testes of Young Men as Assessed by Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography; Including the Inter- and Intra-observer Variation. World J Nucl Med. 2014 May;13(2):88-93.
- Townsend DW. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Semin Nucl Med. 2008 May;38(3):152-66.
- Harper L, Simmons C, Nathan M, Thanarajasingam G, Kim H, Young J. Establishing Normal Testicular 18F-FDG PET/CT SUVs. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Jun;216(6):1634-1640.
- Parida GK, Muthu GS, Suman A, Kumar A, Mitra S. Physiologic Testicular Uptake of 18-F Fluorodeoxyglucose in the Indian Population. Indian J Nucl Med. 2021 Jul-Sep;36(3):261-266.
- Nie X, Munyoki SK, Sukhwani M, et al. Single-cell analysis of human testis aging and correlation with elevated body mass index. Dev Cell. 2022 May 9;57(9):1160-1176.e5.
- Anawalt BD, Matsumoto AM. Aging and androgens: Physiology and clinical implications. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2022 Dec;23(6):1123-1137.
- Wang Y, Chen F, Ye L, Zirkin B, Chen H. Steroidogenesis in Leydig cells: effects of aging and environmental factors. Reproduction. 2017 Oct;154(4):R111-R122.
- Chen H, Hardy MP, Zirkin BR. Age-related decreases in Leydig cell testosterone production are not restored by exposure to LH in vitro. Endocrinology 2002;143:1637–42.
- Moon SH, Eo JS, Lee JJ, Chung JK, Lee DS, Lee MC. (18)F-FDG Uptake of Human Testis on PET/CT: Correlation with Age, Sex Hormones, and Vasectomy. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011 Dec;45(4):291-8.


| Correlation between | Testicular uptake | Correlation co-efficient (r) | p |
| Age | SUV1mean | -0.210 | <0.001 |
| Blood glucose level (mg/dl) | SUVmean | -0.057 | 0.372 |
| Testicular volume (cm3) | SUVmean | +0.135 | <0.001 |
| Group | Age | n | Mean SUV2 of testis | Volume (cm3) | ||
| Mean ± SD1 | Range | Mean ± SD | Range | |||
| A | 20-29 | 9 | 3.00 ± 0.46 | 2.43-4.11 | 26.5 ± 6.1 | 17.7-38.05 |
| B | 30-39 | 12 | 2.81 ± 0.48 | 1.89-4.01 | 22.6 ± 6.3 | 3.5-38.4 |
| C | 40-49 | 16 | 2.63 ± 0.37 | 1.49-3.37 | 21.1 ± 6.3 | 11.3-35.2 |
| D | 50-59 | 17 | 2.68 ± 0.43 | 1.60-3.70 | 19.5 ± 5.9 | 8.8-36.2 |
| E | 60-69 | 15 | 2.58 ± 0.50 | 1.51-3.52 | 20.0 ± 7.3 | 9.7-32.7 |
| F | 70-79 | 11 | 2.33 ± 0.48 | 1.31-3.24 | 18.5 ± 7.1 | 7.6-33.0 |
| Total | 80 | 2.62 ± 0.50 | 1.31-4.11 | 20.45 ± 5.9 | 3.5-38.4 | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.