Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Batteryless IoT Sensing Using Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting from Industrial Motor Waste Heat

Submitted:

05 February 2026

Posted:

06 February 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
This study presents the design, implementation, and validation of a thermoelectric energy harvesting system that exploits waste heat from an industrial electric motor to power an autonomous wireless sensor device. The proposed prototype integrates a single thermoelectric generator directly onto the motor housing and leverages the built-in cooling fan to maintain a stable thermal gradient of approximately 4–5 C. Under real factory conditions, the system harvested 6.17 J of energy over 9612 s, sustaining continuous operation and 41 successful Long Range (LoRa) data transmissions with a positive energy balance. Compared with related works, the prototype achieved competitive or superior performance while operating at a lower motor rating of 0.25 kW, highlighting its efficiency relative to system scale. Key innovations include a hybrid DC/DC conversion chain bridging ultra-low input voltages to modern microcontrollers, and an adaptive transmission strategy that ensures predictable energy management and reliable wireless communication. These results demonstrate the feasibility of battery-free sensing in industrial environments and underline the potential of thermoelectric harvesting as a cost-effective, maintenance-free, and environmentally responsible solution for predictive maintenance and Industry 4.0 applications.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

In modern industrial systems, the demand for continuous data acquisition has become a fundamental requirement for ensuring operational efficiency, safety, and competitiveness [1,2]. The transition towards digitalized production, often framed under the concepts of Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things (IoT), increasingly relies on advanced sensing technologies that enable real-time monitoring of machines and processes [3,4]. Artificial intelligence methods play a pivotal role in this transformation, providing the means for predictive maintenance and condition monitoring that reduce unplanned downtime, extend the service life of critical components, and optimize resource utilization [5]. At the same time, ecological and economic pressures are driving the development of sustainable solutions that minimize dependence on disposable batteries and promote energy-efficient maintenance practices, thereby lowering both operational costs and environmental impact [6].
Despite the rapid progress in sensing and communication technologies, the long-term deployment of IoT devices remains constrained by their energy supply [7]. Conventional solutions rely on primary or rechargeable batteries, which introduce several limitations: restricted lifetime, the need for periodic replacement or recharging, and the associated maintenance costs. In many industrial applications, the encapsulation of sensing devices makes battery access impractical or even impossible. Moreover, the large-scale use of batteries contributes to ecological concerns related to material consumption and waste management. To address these challenges, research has increasingly focused on energy harvesting strategies, which exploit ambient energy sources to achieve autonomous operation of wireless sensor systems [8].
Among the available energy harvesting approaches, thermal energy has attracted significant attention due to its ubiquity in both natural and industrial environments. Heat sources such as solar radiation, geothermal reservoirs, or waste heat from machinery represent promising opportunities for generating electrical power in situ [1,9]. In particular, waste heat from electric motors and other industrial equipment offers a stable and predictable energy source, making it highly suitable for long-term sensor operation. Thermoelectric generators (TEGs) provide a robust means of exploiting such temperature gradients, as they operate without moving parts, require minimal maintenance, and can deliver continuous power even from small temperature differences [10]. These properties make TEG-based harvesters especially attractive for industrial IoT applications where reliability and autonomy are critical.
The proposed concept builds on these principles by integrating a TEG directly with an industrial electric motor, thereby harvesting waste heat to supply energy for an autonomous IoT node. As illustrated in Figure 1, the harvested energy powers a wireless sensor system capable of measuring operational parameters of the motor and transmitting the data to the cloud. This architecture eliminates the dependence on batteries, ensuring sustainable and maintenance-free operation. By enabling continuous monitoring of machinery, the solution supports both predictive maintenance and condition monitoring, which are key pillars of modern smart manufacturing strategies. The integration with cloud-based analytics further allows advanced data processing, including the application of artificial intelligence methods for fault detection and performance optimization.
This study advances the field of energy-autonomous sensing by demonstrating the practical integration of thermoelectric harvesting with industrial equipment. Unlike previous works that primarily focus on laboratory characterization of TEG modules or partial subsystems, the presented solution delivers a fully functional prototype of an IoT device powered exclusively by harvested thermal energy. The system shows that reliable wireless communication and cloud connectivity can be achieved without batteries, supporting long-term predictive maintenance and condition monitoring in real industrial environments.
The main contributions of this work are as follows:
  • Develop a thermoelectric energy harvesting approach that exploits waste heat from industrial motors through optimized mechanical integration.
  • Implement a complete prototype that directly powers an IoT device from harvested energy without the use of batteries.
  • Demonstrate reliable wireless sensing with cloud data transmission supporting both predictive maintenance and condition monitoring in real industrial conditions.
The remainder of this paper is structured as follows. Section 2 describes the design of the proposed thermoelectric energy harvesting system and its integration with the motor. Section 3 presents the experimental methodology, including the setup and measurement procedures. Section 4 summarizes the results obtained from both the harvester evaluation and the operation of the sensor device. Section 5 provides a detailed discussion, comparing the findings with related work, outlining the main contributions, limitations, and future research directions. Finally, Section 6 concludes the paper by highlighting the key outcomes and practical implications of the study.

2. Related work

In the context of Industry 4.0, continuous data acquisition from machines and processes is essential for effective production planning and maintenance [1,2]. Wired sensor systems have traditionally been used for this purpose, since they provide both power and data transmission. Their disadvantage is limited flexibility, especially in distributed or hard-to-reach locations. Wireless sensor nodes address this limitation and enable easier deployment [3,4], but they usually rely on batteries that require regular replacement or recharging. In many cases, access to batteries is difficult or impractical, and large numbers of deployed batteries also raise environmental concerns. To overcome these limitations, research has focused on energy harvesting, where ambient energy is converted into electrical power for long-term autonomous sensor operation [8].
A wide range of studies has investigated thermoelectric energy harvesting for powering wireless sensor nodes in different environments and applications. Table 1 summarizes representative experiments, including gearbox monitoring [11], railway bearings [12], vehicle exhaust systems [13], and electric motors in industrial settings [14,15,16,17]. Other works have targeted power generation from heating elements in vehicles [18], switch cabinets [19], coking plants [20], thermos pots [21], and soil–air gradients for outdoor IoT devices [22,23]. Additional applications include respiration monitoring using micro-TEGs [24], hybrid TEG / phase change materials (TEG/PCM) systems [25], flexible generators powered by body heat [26], and buried infrastructure monitoring with long-term underground deployments [27]. The reported results vary widely in terms of available temperature differences, harvested energy, and achieved output power, reflecting both the diversity of operating conditions and the limitations of current solutions.
As seen in Table 1, the reported temperature differences range from only a few degrees Celsius in small motors or soil–air systems [14,16,22] up to several tens of degrees in large engines or industrial processes [13,20,25]. The corresponding harvested power varies from hundreds of microwatts to several watts. Many studies confirm that even small Δ T values are sufficient to enable low-power sensing, but most experiments remain limited to laboratory settings or partial demonstrations of energy conversion. Only a few works [14,15,16,17] attempt to integrate TEG harvesters with complete IoT sensor nodes, and these typically provide restricted functionality or short-term operation. This highlights the challenge of achieving reliable, batteryless sensing under real industrial conditions.
Iezzi [28] evaluates a TEG mounted on pipe insulation, where only a very small portion of the heat is available for conversion, resulting in sub-milliwatt power levels. Jiang [29] does not analyze an operational system but rather characterizes the behavior of the TEG itself under generic heating, providing electrical measurements without integrating the harvester into an application. By contrast, Aragonés [30] and Boegel [31] exploit high-grade thermal sources from steam pipelines or coolant lines, where temperature gradients of tens or even hundreds of degrees Celsius enable orders-of-magnitude higher output, reaching the watt range in controlled setups. The most practically relevant example for low-grade industrial waste heat is Santos [14], who demonstrate that even a modest temperature difference of 3.27C on an electric motor can yield 3.19 mW (TEG 55×55 mm) and accumulate 909.35 mJ every five minutes (IEEE 802.15.4), sufficient to power a complete wireless vibration-monitoring node.
In summary, previous research demonstrates the feasibility of thermoelectric harvesting for supplying low-power electronics, but most studies are restricted to laboratory validation, simplified setups, or short-term demonstrations. Only a limited number of works combine TEGs with wireless nodes in real operating environments, and these often face constraints in harvested power, stability, or long-term applicability. There remains a clear need for practical evaluation of complete IoT devices powered directly from industrial waste heat, with robust data transmission and integration into predictive maintenance and condition monitoring frameworks. The present study addresses this gap by implementing and validating a fully functional prototype in a smart factory environment.

3. Methods and Experiment

This section outlines the methodology applied to design, implement, and validate the proposed thermoelectric energy-harvesting system integrated with an industrial motor. The presentation follows a structured approach: first, the construction of the waste heat energy harvester is introduced, including mechanical design considerations and integration with the motor housing. Second, the development of a batteryless IoT prototype is described, highlighting the energy conversion chain and wireless communication module. Finally, the experimental procedure is detailed, covering the Smart Factory test environment, measurement chain, and test scenarios for both electrical characterization and real IoT operation. Together, these subsections provide a comprehensive account of the system development and its validation under realistic industrial conditions.

3.1. Waste Heat Energy Harvester for Electrical Motor

To obtain a usable temperature difference for thermoelectric energy harvesting, a prototype was designed for integration with a small industrial motor operating in the Smart Factory demonstration line. The selected unit is a BOSCH Rexroth type 3 842 547 992 motor (0.25 kW, worm gear) driving one of the conveyor systems. Since the thermal field on the motor housing is not uniform, an infrared analysis was carried out to locate the most suitable area for harvester installation.
Figure 2 shows the surface temperature distribution, highlighting hot spots on the smooth part of the housing where the thermoelectric module can be mounted to achieve a stable temperature gradient during operation. In practice, the measured surface temperatures ranged from approximately 35 °C to 60 °C, providing a sufficient gradient against the ambient air to enable effective energy conversion.
The mechanical construction of the harvester was designed to enable reliable attachment of a flat TEG onto the curved surface of the motor casing. To compensate for the curvature, a custom-machined aluminium adapter, further referred to as the heat transfer part (HTP), was introduced as an intermediate element ensuring uniform contact and efficient heat transfer. The selected TEG was a Marlow RC12-8-01LS module (40 mm × 44.7 mm, thickness 3.51 mm), chosen based on its proven performance in previous experiments. On the cold side, a Wakefield Thermal 910-40-2-33-2-B-0 aluminium heatsink was mounted, matching the footprint of the TEG. The heatsink was equipped with tubular fins to enlarge the effective surface area and reduce thermal resistance. To minimize contact imperfections at each interface, all surfaces between the motor, HTP, TEG, and heatsink were coated with ARTIC MX-4 thermal paste. The arrangement of the HTP components and the air tunnel is illustrated in Figure 3.
To further enhance the thermal gradient across the TEG, the design also takes advantage of the airflow generated by the integrated cooling fan of the motor. During operation, the fan drives air through the housing, which is partially finned to improve heat dissipation. The harvester was mounted on a smooth section of the housing without fins, where localized heat accumulates. This position simultaneously enables the directed airflow to pass through the added air tunnel surrounding the heatsink, as illustrated in Figure 4. The accelerated cooling of the heatsink lowers its surface temperature and thus increases the Δ T across the TEG. Figure 4b shows the deployment of the complete energy harvesting device on the motor in the Industry 4.0 demonstrator line, where it was also equipped with temperature sensors to enable detailed validation under real operating conditions.

3.2. Prototype of Battery-less IoT Device

A fully operational prototype of a wireless IoT node was developed to demonstrate the feasibility of powering embedded electronics exclusively from thermoelectric energy harvesting. The design objective was to achieve reliable operation with minimal energy overhead while maintaining compatibility with industrial deployment scenarios.
The harvested voltage from the TEG is conditioned by an LTC3109 ultra-low-voltage DC/DC converter, which charges a 20 mF storage capacitor to buffer the intermittent energy supply. An LMR1901YG-M operational amplifier is included to enable precise voltage measurement and monitoring of the storage element. Downstream regulation is provided by a TPS62840 high-efficiency buck converter, delivering a stable supply to the digital electronics. This configuration ensures reliable bridging between the millivolt-level TEG output and the requirements of modern low-power components.
Figure 5. Prototype of the IoT node powered by thermoelectric energy harvesting. The hardware integrates: LTC3109 DC/DC converter with 20 mF storage capacitor, LMR1901YG-M operational amplifier, KL25Z4 microcontroller, TPS62840 step-down converter, and SX1261 LoRa transceiver.
Figure 5. Prototype of the IoT node powered by thermoelectric energy harvesting. The hardware integrates: LTC3109 DC/DC converter with 20 mF storage capacitor, LMR1901YG-M operational amplifier, KL25Z4 microcontroller, TPS62840 step-down converter, and SX1261 LoRa transceiver.
Preprints 197699 g005
The control and sensing logic are executed by an NXP KL25Z4 microcontroller, a 32-bit ARM Cortex-M0+ device with integrated peripherals for data acquisition and energy management. For long-range wireless communication, a Semtech SX1261 Long Range (LoRa) transceiver is employed, enabling periodic transmission of measured data to the cloud. LoRa technology was selected for its favorable balance of range and energy efficiency, making it well suited for batteryless IoT devices powered by energy harvesting. The modular design further allows adaptation of transmission parameters (e.g., spreading factor, bandwidth, payload size) to match the available harvested energy, as demonstrated in [32].

3.3. Experimental procedure

The experimental campaign was designed with two main objectives: first, to characterize the thermal and electrical behavior of the proposed harvester under real operating conditions of an industrial motor; and second, to verify its capability to reliably power a wireless IoT node for long-term autonomous operation. For this purpose, a dedicated measurement setup was established within the Smart Factory demonstrator line at VSB–Technical University of Ostrava. The environment provides realistic conditions for testing energy harvesting from industrial motors, while allowing controlled monitoring of thermal fields, harvested power, and wireless data transmission performance.
The Smart Factory demonstrator (Figure 6) consists of a modular production line equipped with conveyor systems, robotic manipulators, and multiple electric drives. This platform is primarily used for education and research in the field of Industry 4.0, providing a realistic environment for testing advanced sensing and energy harvesting concepts. The harvester prototype was installed on a BOSCH Rexroth 0.25 kW motor driving one of the conveyor modules. This integration allowed continuous exposure to realistic thermal loads generated during operation, while also enabling straightforward instrumentation for experimental measurements.
To capture the operating characteristics of the TEG, a dedicated measurement chain was implemented. Surface temperatures on the hot and cold sides of the TEG were monitored using Pt100 sensors (type TT-PT100A-2050-11-AUNI, class A accuracy) connected to a National Instruments NI-9219 universal DAQ module via a four-wire interface to ensure high precision. The DAQ module, housed in a cDAQ-9171 chassis, provided both power and data communication with a host PC, while a custom LabVIEW application was developed for data acquisition, processing, and visualization. Two complementary test configurations were applied (Figure 7): (a) measurements with a resistive load matched to the TEG internal resistance, and (b) direct powering of the IoT node through the storage capacitor to verify wireless transmission under realistic operating conditions.
To analyze the electrical behavior of the system in greater detail, two circuit configurations were implemented. The first configuration (Figure 7a) connected the TEG output to an LTC3109 ultra-low-voltage DC/DC converter, which ensured efficient energy transfer and enabled operation from temperature differences as low as ±1 °C. This setup allowed precise evaluation of the conversion efficiency and the behaviour of the storage capacitor during charging. The second configuration (Figure 7b) included the complete IoT node, where the harvested energy powered the KL25Z4 microcontroller and the SX1261 LoRa transceiver. In this case, the LTC3109 supplied the baseline energy management, while the TPS62840 high-efficiency step-down converter provided stable power to the radio during transmission. This dual approach enabled both laboratory-style characterization and verification of real IoT operation under energy harvesting conditions.
The IoT node operated under a simple duty-cycling strategy implemented in the microcontroller firmware. The algorithm continuously monitored the capacitor voltage and initiated a wireless transmission only when the voltage exceeded 2.0 V, ensuring that sufficient energy was available to complete the operation. After each successful transmission, the node entered a sleep mode for 20 s to minimize quiescent consumption and allow the capacitor to recharge from the harvester. This strategy guaranteed reliable operation of the wireless link while adapting the duty cycle to the variable amount of harvested energy.

4. Results

The experimental evaluation was carried out in two consecutive stages to verify both the performance of the developed thermoelectric energy harvesting device and its capability to reliably power an IoT sensor node. First, the energy harvester prototype was analyzed in terms of thermal and electrical behavior under realistic operating conditions. Subsequently, the feasibility of autonomous operation of a wireless sensor node powered solely by harvested energy was assessed, focusing on transmission regularity, energy balance, and system stability.

4.1. Energy Harvester Performance

To assess the capability of the developed thermoelectric prototype to convert waste heat into usable electrical energy, the device was mounted on a small electric motor driving a manipulator in the production line test bed. The objective of this evaluation was twofold: to characterize the thermal behavior of the harvester under realistic operating conditions and to quantify the corresponding electrical output as a function of the temperature difference across TEG.
Figure 8a depicts the temperature evolution on the hot and cold sides of the TEG during continuous motor operation. After start-up, both surfaces exhibited a gradual increase in temperature, reflecting the heating of the motor casing and the heat sink. The resulting temperature difference stabilized in the range of 4.8–5.2 °C, with an average of 4.0 °C over the entire experiment (Figure 8b). A transient increase was observed immediately after the motor was switched off, caused by the cessation of the integrated cooling fan, which temporarily reduced convective heat dissipation before the system returned to ambient conditions. These findings demonstrate that a measurable and stable thermal gradient can be established even without dedicated thermal management.
The corresponding electrical characteristics are shown in Figure 9. The TEG produced an voltage that increased with time until thermal steady state was reached. The maximum measured voltage was 89.6 mV, with a mean of 64.2 mV and a median of 81.5 mV. The associated electrical power output peaked at 5.07 mW, with an average value of 3.16 mW and a median of 4.19 mW. The observed temporal evolution of both voltage and power closely followed the thermal response of the system, indicating that the harvester output becomes progressively more stable as the thermal conditions approach equilibrium.
A more detailed view of the harvester behavior is provided in Table 2, which reports the electrical parameters as a function of the temperature difference across the TEG. At a minimal Δ T of 0.5 °C, the device generated only 6.26 μ W, while a Δ T of 5 °C yielded 4.72 mW. This scaling behavior confirms that even modest improvements in thermal coupling or gradient enhancement can substantially increase the harvested power.

4.2. IoT Sensor Analysis

To verify the feasibility of fully autonomous operation, the developed harvester was deployed to power a wireless sensor node integrated into the production line environment. The node consisted of a microcontroller and a LoRa transceiver, executing an energy-aware algorithm designed to regulate data transmissions according to the instantaneous energy state. The experiment aimed to demonstrate whether the harvested energy could reliably sustain continuous operation without external supply.
Figure 10a shows the temporal evolution of the temperature difference across the thermoelectric module, the corresponding capacitor voltage, and the instants of data transmission. After an initial charging phase, the system entered stable operation, with regular transmissions sustained by harvested energy. The cumulative energy balance presented in Figure 10b confirms that 6.17 J of energy was harvested while 6.05 J was consumed, yielding a slight surplus. This margin indicates that the device was able to compensate for natural fluctuations in the thermal gradient and operate continuously without external intervention.
In Figure 11, the transmission intervals of the wireless sensor node powered by the energy harvester are analyzed. Panel (a) illustrates the sequential order of transmissions, where the vertical axis represents the elapsed time between successive messages. Most intervals fall within the range of approximately 170–220 s, with only a few instances deviating towards longer or shorter delays. The box-plot in panel (b) provides a statistical summary of the interval distribution. The median lies around 200 s, and the inter-quartile range is relatively narrow, indicating stable sensor operation.
Finally, Table 3 quantifies the dependence of transmission periodicity on the available temperature difference. At Δ T = 0.5 C, the interval between transmissions is estimated to approach 2000 min, whereas at Δ T = 5 C the node is capable of transmitting every 2.6 min. It should be noted that these values were not obtained from direct long-term measurements but were derived analytically: the transmission interval was approximated as inversely proportional to the harvested power, using the experimentally verified operating point at Δ T = 4.5 C as the reference. All other entries in the table therefore represent extrapolated estimates based on this proportionality.

5. Discussion

The results of this study demonstrate the feasibility of powering an autonomous IoT device exclusively by harvesting waste heat from an industrial motor. The developed prototype achieved stable operation under real factory conditions, where modest temperature differences of approximately 4–5 °C were sufficient to sustain continuous data acquisition and regular wireless transmissions. Throughout the measurement campaign, the energy harvested exceeded the consumption, enabling uninterrupted functionality of the sensor node. These findings confirm that even small and naturally occurring thermal gradients can be effectively exploited to ensure reliable operation of embedded electronics without the need for batteries or external power sources.
When compared with previously published approaches, the developed prototype demonstrates a favorable balance between harvested energy, power output, and system simplicity. As summarized in Table 4, Santos [14] reported 909.35,mJ harvested from an electric motor using a single TEG; however, their setup employed a substantially larger thermoelectric module, whereas our prototype operates with a TEG of approximately 60 % of that active area. In addition, their wireless transmission relied on the relatively energy-efficient IEEE 802.15.4 protocol, while our system must accommodate a more demanding communication scheme, which further increases the energy budget required for each measurement cycle. Oliveira achieved 370.10 µW with three modules [16] and 320 µW with a hybrid solution [17]. Reeh et al. [15] obtained 1.3 mW by positioning a module between an electric motor and a centrifugal pump, though at a significantly higher motor rating of 2.5 kW. In contrast, the system presented here harvested 6.17 J during 9612 s of operation and delivered an average of 0.64 mW, with peaks exceeding 5 mW, despite being attached to a motor of only 0.25 kW. These results highlight an improved energy harvesting efficiency relative to the scale of the machine and confirm that reliable wireless communication can be sustained even under modest thermal conditions. The findings further underline the benefit of direct integration with the motor housing and utilization of the built-in cooling fan, which enables both stable thermal gradients and minimal installation effort compared with more complex experimental arrangements.
The presented design also introduces several innovations that enhance its practical value for industrial applications. Unlike many studies that rely on multiple modules or large thermal gradients to achieve usable power levels [16,17], this prototype demonstrates that a single TEG can provide sufficient and stable output when integrated directly on the motor casing and supported by the existing airflow of the built-in cooling fan. As indicated in Table 4, the achieved energy and power levels are competitive with or superior to more complex setups, despite the use of a comparatively small motor. A further novelty lies in the use of a hybrid DC/DC conversion chain (LTC3109 and TPS62840), which effectively bridges the ultra-low input voltage of the TEG with the operating requirements of modern microcontrollers and wireless transceivers. Combined with an adaptive transmission strategy, this ensures efficient utilization of the harvested energy and predictable operation of the sensor node. These features make the approach particularly suitable for retrofitting into existing industrial environments, where low cost, non-invasive integration, and long-term autonomy are critical requirements.
Despite these promising results, several limitations of the presented work should be acknowledged. The absolute power output remains in the order of milliwatts, which constrains the range of potential applications to low-power sensing and communication tasks. The experiments were performed on a single motor type under stable operating conditions, and thus the generalisability of the results to different machines or more dynamic environments remains to be validated. In addition, the duration of the experimental campaign was limited to a few hours, whereas long-term stability and reliability over months or years are critical for industrial deployment. Potential issues such as the thermal cycling of the TEG, ageing of capacitors, or mechanical stability of the mounting under vibrations were not addressed. These factors represent important aspects for future studies to ensure the robustness of the system in practical use.
Future improvements of the proposed concept may build on both circuit-level and system-level enhancements. At the circuit level, next-generation DC/DC converters such as the EM8900, which can start harvesting from input voltages as low as 5 mV [?], or the MATRIX Mercury with a 9 mV threshold [?], offer opportunities to extend the operational envelope towards smaller temperature gradients and faster cold-start behavior. At the system level, hybrid harvesters that combine thermoelectric conversion with alternative sources such as vibrations, solar radiation, or electromagnetic induction could further increase the available energy budget. Long-term testing across different motor types, varying workloads, and seasonal conditions will be essential to validate durability and scalability. Finally, integration with artificial intelligence techniques for adaptive duty-cycle control and predictive diagnostics represents a promising direction, enabling sensor nodes not only to operate autonomously but also to contribute actively to advanced maintenance strategies in Industry 4.0.
From a practical perspective, the findings highlight the potential of thermoelectric energy harvesting as a sustainable alternative to battery-powered sensing in industrial environments. The elimination of batteries reduces maintenance requirements, lowers operational costs, and minimizes environmental impact associated with large-scale battery disposal. The compact design and straightforward installation make the system attractive for retrofitting onto existing machinery without interrupting operation. By ensuring continuous data collection and transmission, the approach directly supports predictive maintenance strategies, which are central to modern manufacturing concepts. As such, the presented solution not only advances the technical feasibility of battery-free sensing but also contributes to the broader goals of Industry 4.0 by enabling reliable, autonomous, and environmentally responsible monitoring of industrial assets.

6. Conclusions

This work presented the development and validation of a thermoelectric energy harvesting system designed to power wireless sensor devices directly from the waste heat of an industrial electric motor. The prototype demonstrated that even modest temperature gradients of approximately 4–5 °C are sufficient to sustain continuous autonomous operation, including regular wireless data transmissions. Over a measurement period of 9612 s, the system harvested 6.17 J of energy while consuming 6.05 J, maintaining a positive energy balance and confirming the feasibility of battery-free operation under realistic factory conditions.
In comparison with related studies, the proposed approach achieves competitive or superior performance in terms of harvested energy and power output, despite relying on a single thermoelectric module and operating at lower motor power. The integration strategy—direct attachment to the motor housing with the aid of the built-in cooling fan—ensures both stable thermal gradients and simple, low-cost installation, making the solution well suited for retrofitting in industrial environments.
The system further benefits from a hybrid DC/DC power conversion chain, which bridges the ultra-low input voltages of the TEG with the requirements of modern microcontrollers and radio transceivers. Together with an adaptive transmission strategy, this enables predictable energy management and reliable wireless communication.
Looking ahead, the adoption of next-generation converters capable of harvesting from lower input voltages, as well as the combination with hybrid energy sources, offers promising opportunities to expand the operational envelope. Long-term testing across different machine types and workloads will be essential to validate durability. By demonstrating a practical pathway towards sustainable, maintenance-free sensing, this study contributes to the broader objectives of Industry 4.0 and highlights the role of thermoelectric harvesting in enabling reliable and environmentally responsible monitoring of industrial assets.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.B., Ja.K. and M.P.; methodology, K.B., Ja.K. and M.P.; software, M.S.; validation, K.B., M.S., Ja.K., M.P., V.M. and D.A.; formal analysis, K.B. and M.S.; investigation, K.B. and M.S.; resources, R.H.; data curation, K.B.; writing—original draft preparation, K.B., Ja.K. and M.P.; writing—review and editing, Ja.K., M.P., V.M. and D.A.; visualization, K.B. and Ja.K.; supervision, M.P.; project administration, M.P.; funding acquisition, Ji.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the European Regional Development Fund under the project Research Platform for Digital Transformation and Society 5.0 CZ.02.01.01/00/23_021/0012599 within the Jan Amos Komenský Operational Program. This work was also supported by the project SP2026/025, “Development of algorithms and systems for control, measurement and safety applications XII” of Student Grant System, VSB-TU Ostrava.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets and source code used in this study are openly available in the Zenodo repository at the following DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17670801

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Use of Artificial Intelligence

During the preparation of this work, the author(s) used ChatGPT by OpenAI in order to improve the clarity and grammar of the manuscript draft. After using this tool/service, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.

References

  1. Tang, X.; Wang, X.; Cattley, R.; Gu, F.; Ball, A. Energy Harvesting Technologies for Achieving Self-Powered Wireless Sensor Networks in Machine Condition Monitoring. Sensors 2018, 18. [CrossRef]
  2. Aranguren, P.; Araiz, M.; Astrain, D.; Martínez, A. Thermoelectric generators for waste heat harvesting: A computational and experimental approach. Energy Conversion and Management 2017, 148, 680–691. [CrossRef]
  3. Wan, Q.; Teh, Y.K.; Gao, Y.; Mok, P.K.T. Analysis and Design of a Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting System With Reconfigurable Array of Thermoelectric Generators for IoT Applications. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers 2017, 64, 2346–2358. [CrossRef]
  4. Jamshed, M.A.; Ali, K.; Abbasi, Q.H.; Imran, M.A.; Ur-Rehman, M. Challenges, Applications, and Future of Wireless Sensors in Internet of Things: A Review. IEEE Sensors Journal 2022, 22, 5482–5494. [CrossRef]
  5. Afrin, S.; Rafa, S.J.; Kabir, M.; Farah, T.; Alam, M.S.B.; Lameesa, A.; Ahmed, S.F.; Gandomi, A.H. Industrial Internet of Things: Implementations, challenges, and potential solutions across various industries. Computers in Industry 2025, 170. [CrossRef]
  6. Kausik, A.K.; Rashid, A.B.; Baki, R.F.; Jannat Maktum, M.M. Machine learning algorithms for manufacturing quality assurance: A systematic review of performance metrics and applications. Array 2025, 26. [CrossRef]
  7. Alioto, M. From Less Batteries to Battery-Less Alert Systems with Wide Power Adaptation down to nWs - Toward a Smarter, Greener World. IEEE Design and Test 2021, 38, 90 – 133. [CrossRef]
  8. Kucova, T.; Prauzek, M.; Konecny, J.; Andriukaitis, D.; Zilys, M.; Martinek, R. Thermoelectric energy harvesting for internet of things devices using machine learning: A review. CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology 2023, 8, 680–700. [CrossRef]
  9. Bancik, K.; Konecny, J.; Konecny, J.; Mikus, M.; Choutka, J.; Hercik, R.; Koziorek, J.; Navikas, D.; Andriukaitis, D.; Prauzek, M. Powering Agriculture IoT Sensors Using Natural Temperature Differences Between Air and Soil: Measurement and Evaluation. Sensors 2024, 24. [CrossRef]
  10. Thi Kim Tuoi, T.; Van Toan, N.; Ono, T. Thermal energy harvester using ambient temperature fluctuations for self-powered wireless IoT sensing systems: A review. Nano Energy 2024, 121. [CrossRef]
  11. Elforjani, B.; Xu, Y.; Brethee, K.; Wu, Z.; Gu, F.; Ball, A. Monitoring gearbox using a wireless temperature node powered by thermal energy harvesting module. 2017 23rd International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC) 2017, pp. 1–6. [CrossRef]
  12. Ahn, D.; Choi, K. Performance Evaluation of Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting System on Operating Rolling Stock. Micromachines 2018, 9. [CrossRef]
  13. Risseh, A.E.; Nee, H.P.; Goupil, C. Electrical Power Conditioning System for Thermoelectric Waste Heat Recovery in Commercial Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification 2018, 4, 548–562. [CrossRef]
  14. Santos, A.D.D.; de Brito, S.C.; Martins, A.V.; Silva, F.F.; Morais, F. Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting on Rotation Machines for Wireless Sensor Network in Industry 4.0. 2021 14th IEEE International Conference on Industry Applications (INDUSCON) 2021-8-15, pp. 694–697. [CrossRef]
  15. Reeh, N.; Schillinger, D.; Hehn, T.; Koehler, M. Energy harvesting based predictive maintenance system for centrifugal pumps in swimming pools. In Proceedings of the EASS 2022; 11th GMM-Symposium, 2022, pp. 1–3.
  16. de Oliveira, L.F.P.; de Oliveira Morais, F.J.; Manera, L.T. Development of an energy harvesting system based on a thermoelectric generator for use in online predictive maintenance systems of industrial electric motors. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 2023, 60. [CrossRef]
  17. de Oliveira, L.F.P.; de Oliveira Morais, F.J.; Manera, L.T. Development of a hybrid energy harvesting system based on thermoelectric and electromagnetic generators for use in industrial electric motors. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 2024, 66. [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, S.B.; Shin, J.; Kim, H.S.; Lee, D.G.; Park, J.C.; Baik, J.M.; Kim, S.Y.; Kang, C.Y.; Choi, W.; Song, H.C.; et al. A synergetic effect of piezoelectric energy harvester to enhance thermoelectric Power. Energy Conversion and Management 2023, 298. [CrossRef]
  19. Yu, J.; Zhang, T.; Lu, H.; Wu, S.; Gao, P.; Tian, C.; Zhang, W.; Yin, F. Self-powered Wireless Temperature Sensor Driven by the Thermoelectric Generator in the Power Distribution Cabinet. 2024 IEEE 4th International Conference on Digital Twins and Parallel Intelligence (DTPI) 2024-10-18, pp. 74–78. [CrossRef]
  20. Boitier, V.; Seguier, L.; Estibals, B.; Arnaud, C.; Anfrie, T.; Maurin, C. Thermoelectricity To Power Wireless Sensors. 2024 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Micro and Miniature Power Systems, Self-Powered Sensors and Energy Autonomous Devices (PowerMEMS) 2024-11-18, pp. 111–114. [CrossRef]
  21. Toan, N.V.; Tuoi, T.T.K.; Toda, M.; Hieu, N.V.; Ono, T. A Novel Flexible Thermoelectric Generator For Harvesting Low Thermal Heat Waste For Self-Powered Sensing System. 2024 IEEE 19th International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems (NEMS) 2024-5-2, pp. 1–4. [CrossRef]
  22. Puluckul, P.P.; Weyn, M. Harvesting Energy From Soil-Air Temperature Differences for Batteryless IoT Devices. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 85306–85323. [CrossRef]
  23. Kürschner, V.N.; Spengler, A.W.; Paiva, K.V. Thermoelectric energy harvesting associated with heat pipes for monitoring highways weather conditions. Discover Mechanical Engineering 2024, 3. [CrossRef]
  24. Yan, B.; Wang, J.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Gao, X.; Hu, Z.; Zhou, X.; Li, M.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, C. Ultra-sensitive micro thermoelectric device for energy harvesting and ultra-low airflow detection. Discover Mechanical Engineering 2025, 11. [CrossRef]
  25. Patra, S.; Singh, A. Thermoelectric Generator With Boost Converter as a Portable Power Source for Battery Charging. IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology 2025, 15, 725–732. [CrossRef]
  26. Lv, H.; Xia, Y.; Wang, Z. A Flexible Thermoelectric Generator with Optimized Design for Low-Thermal Heat Waste Energy Harvesting. 2025 IEEE 38th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) 2025-1-19, pp. 787–790. [CrossRef]
  27. Boebel, M.; Frei, F.; Blumensaat, F.; Ebi, C.; Meli, M.L.; Rüst, A. Batteryless Sensor Devices for Underground Infrastructure—A Long-Term Experiment on Urban Water Pipes. Journal of Low Power Electronics and Applications 2023, 13, 787–790. [CrossRef]
  28. Iezzi, B.; Ankireddy, K.; Twiddy, J.; Losego, M.D.; Jur, J.S. Printed, metallic thermoelectric generators integrated with pipe insulation for powering wireless sensors. Applied Energy 2017, 208, 758–765. [CrossRef]
  29. Jiang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yan, J.; Shen, L.; Qin, J. Research on the Performance of Thermoelectric Self-Powered Systems for Wireless Sensor Based on Industrial Waste Heat. Sensors 2024, 24. [CrossRef]
  30. Aragonés, R.; Oliver, J.; Ferrer, C. Thermoelectric Generator-Powered Long-Range Wireless Real-Time Steam Leak Detection in Steam Traps. Future Internet 2024, 16. [CrossRef]
  31. Boegel, G.V.; Meyer, F.; Kemmerling, M. Wireless Sensor System for Industrial Applications Powered by Thermoelectric Generator. 2014. [CrossRef]
  32. Prauzek, M.; Paterova, T.; Stankus, M.; Mikus, M.; Konecny, J. Analysis of LoRaWAN Transactions for TEG-Powered Environment-Monitoring Devices. Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika 2022, 28, 30–36. [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Application concept of a thermoelectric energy-harvesting IoT sensor in a smart factory environment. Waste heat from an electric motor is converted into electrical energy that powers a wireless node. The collected data are transmitted to the cloud, enabling artificial intelligence methods for predictive maintenance and condition monitoring.
Figure 1. Application concept of a thermoelectric energy-harvesting IoT sensor in a smart factory environment. Waste heat from an electric motor is converted into electrical energy that powers a wireless node. The collected data are transmitted to the cloud, enabling artificial intelligence methods for predictive maintenance and condition monitoring.
Preprints 197699 g001
Figure 2. Electric motor captured by a conventional camera and its corresponding infrared image obtained using a thermal camera, illustrating the maximum measured surface temperature: (a) photograph, (b) infrared thermographic image.
Figure 2. Electric motor captured by a conventional camera and its corresponding infrared image obtained using a thermal camera, illustrating the maximum measured surface temperature: (a) photograph, (b) infrared thermographic image.
Preprints 197699 g002
Figure 3. Visualization of HTP arrangement surrounding the motor, including the configuration of HTP components and the air tunnel: (a) detail view, (b) exploded view of the assembly.
Figure 3. Visualization of HTP arrangement surrounding the motor, including the configuration of HTP components and the air tunnel: (a) detail view, (b) exploded view of the assembly.
Preprints 197699 g003
Figure 4. (a) Proposed air tunnel design illustrating airflow, waste heat transfer, and the integration of HTP and TEG modules with the motor structure. (b) Deployment of the energy harvesting device on the small electrical motor in the Industry 4.0 demonstrator line, equipped with temperature sensors for real-world validation.
Figure 4. (a) Proposed air tunnel design illustrating airflow, waste heat transfer, and the integration of HTP and TEG modules with the motor structure. (b) Deployment of the energy harvesting device on the small electrical motor in the Industry 4.0 demonstrator line, equipped with temperature sensors for real-world validation.
Preprints 197699 g004
Figure 6. Experimental test bed of a Smart Factory established at VSB–Technical University of Ostrava, providing the environment for energy harvesting experiments: (a) 3D model, (b) photograph.
Figure 6. Experimental test bed of a Smart Factory established at VSB–Technical University of Ostrava, providing the environment for energy harvesting experiments: (a) 3D model, (b) photograph.
Preprints 197699 g006
Figure 7. Experimental setup using motor waste heat to supply a TEG: (a) characterization with a resistive load, (b) operation with an IoT node powered via a storage capacitor for wireless transmission.
Figure 7. Experimental setup using motor waste heat to supply a TEG: (a) characterization with a resistive load, (b) operation with an IoT node powered via a storage capacitor for wireless transmission.
Preprints 197699 g007
Figure 8. (a) Temperatures recorded during experiment on hot and cold side of TEG placed in energy harvesting device. (b) Temperature difference on TEG during experiment with small electrical motor.
Figure 8. (a) Temperatures recorded during experiment on hot and cold side of TEG placed in energy harvesting device. (b) Temperature difference on TEG during experiment with small electrical motor.
Preprints 197699 g008
Figure 9. Measured voltage and calculated power during prototype validation.
Figure 9. Measured voltage and calculated power during prototype validation.
Preprints 197699 g009
Figure 10. (a) Temperature difference and capacitor voltage measured during the experiment with the energy harvester powering a LoRa module and microcontroller. (b) Cumulative harvested and consumed energy during the experiment.
Figure 10. (a) Temperature difference and capacitor voltage measured during the experiment with the energy harvester powering a LoRa module and microcontroller. (b) Cumulative harvested and consumed energy during the experiment.
Preprints 197699 g010
Figure 11. Analysis of transmission intervals of the wireless sensor node powered by the energy harvester: (a) sequential order of data transmissions, where the vertical axis represents the time elapsed between consecutive transmissions, (b) box-plot representation of the distribution of transmission intervals.
Figure 11. Analysis of transmission intervals of the wireless sensor node powered by the energy harvester: (a) sequential order of data transmissions, where the vertical axis represents the time elapsed between consecutive transmissions, (b) box-plot representation of the distribution of transmission intervals.
Preprints 197699 g011
Table 1. Representative studies on TEGs powering wireless sensor nodes, showing main heat sources, number of modules, and reported output.
Table 1. Representative studies on TEGs powering wireless sensor nodes, showing main heat sources, number of modules, and reported output.
Study / Experiment Main source of Δ T TEG used Harvested energy Achieved power
Elforjani [11] Gearbox + Air 1
Ahn [12] Bearing + Air 1 16.6 J (3400 s) 19.3 mW
Risseh [13] ATS / EGR 224 / 240 245–420 W; 92–403 W
Santos [14] Electric motor + Air 1 909.35 mJ
Nils [15] Electric motor + Centrifugal pump 1 1.3 mW
Oliveira [16] Electric motor + Air 3 370.10 µW
Kim [18] PTC heater (car engine) 1 7.619 mW
Yu [19] Switch cabinet / Ambient air 1
Boitier [20] Smoke box + Air (coking plant) 1 400 J (one cycle) 800 mW
Toan [21] Thermos pot + Ambient air 1 95.9 mW
Puluckul [22] Soil + Ambient air 1 875 µW (TEG); 337 µW (LTC3109)
Oliveira [17] Electric motor + Air 1 320 µW
Kürschner [23] Soil/Asphalt pavement + Air/Solar 4 286.24 J/day 20.20 mW
Yan [24] Human breath 1 4.5 µW
Patra [25] Waste heat + PCM 16 502 mW
Lv [26] Human body heat to Air 1 110.2 µW
Boebel [27] Water pipe + Surrounding soil 2 21 J/day (avg.)
Iezzi [28] Pipe insulation + Air 0.2 mW
Jiang [29] General heat 1 0.0478 W
Aragones [30] Steam pipeline + Air 1 1 W/170C
Boegel [31] Coolant + Air 1 –
Table 2. Electrical characteristics of the TEG harvester as a function of the temperature difference Δ T : output voltage V TEG , current I TEG , and power P TEG .
Table 2. Electrical characteristics of the TEG harvester as a function of the temperature difference Δ T : output voltage V TEG , current I TEG , and power P TEG .
Δ T V TEG I TEG P TEG
(C) (mV) (mA) (µW)
0.5 2.63 1.75 6.26
1 10.08 6.43 69.25
1.5 11.62 7.30 92.32
2 16.43 10.34 193.82
2.5 31.63 19.96 673.08
3 44.07 27.79 1257.44
3.5 55.73 35.15 1974.95
4 66.54 41.95 2800.47
4.5 76.52 48.23 3696.60
5 86.57 54.54 4724.53
Table 3. Estimated time interval between successive transmissions of the IoT node as a function of the temperature difference Δ T .
Table 3. Estimated time interval between successive transmissions of the IoT node as a function of the temperature difference Δ T .
Δ T (C) 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Estimated time (min) 1976 179 134 64 18 10 6.1 4.4 3.3 2.6
Table 4. Comparison of energy harvesting studies which use waste energy from electric motors.
Table 4. Comparison of energy harvesting studies which use waste energy from electric motors.
Study / Experiment Main source of Δ T TEG used Harvested energy Achieved power
Santos [14] Electric motor + Air 1 909.35 mJ 3.19 mW/3.27
Nils [15] Electric motor + Centrifugal pump 1 - 1.3 mW
Oliveira [16] Electric motor + Air 3 - 370.10 µW
Oliveira [17] Electric motor + Air 1 - 320 µW
This experiment Electric motor + Air 1 6.1686 J (9612 s) 0.6418 mW (avg.)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated