Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

From Exposure to Atherosclerosis: The Cardiovascular Impact of Phthalates and Implications for IHD Prevention

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

02 February 2026

Posted:

04 February 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Despite decades of interventions targeting modifiable risk factors to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease, ischemic heart disease (IHD) remains the leading cause of mortality and the second leading cause of disabilityadjusted lifeyears worldwide. Growing evidence suggests that phthalates - plasticizers widely used in consumer products, cosmetics, and medical devices, and therefore ubiquitous across environmental media - may contribute to IHD development. Epidemiological studies have reported associations between phthalate exposure and multiple markers of atherosclerosis, the pathological hallmark of IHD, with or without mediation by traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Experimental models support these findings, showing that phthalates can induce oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, apoptosis, lipid accumulation, and epigenetic alterations, all of which promote endothelial damage and atherogenesis. In this review, we synthesize current epidemiological findings linking phthalate exposure to IHD, describe the main cellular and molecular mechanisms involved, and outline research gaps and regulatory perspectives. We also discuss how novel analytical frameworks- including Artificial Intelligence - may enhance the integration of environmental, clinical, and molecular data to advance risk prediction and prevention strategies.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Despite a progressive decline in the public health burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) over the past few decades - largely due to interventions targeting modifiable risk factors such as tobacco control, and blood pressure and cholesterol-lowering strategies [1,2] - CVD remains a major global cause of mortality, with an estimated 19.8 million deaths in 2022, representing approximately 32% of all global deaths [3,4]. Conversely, the rising prevalence of obesity and diabetes, compounded by the recent impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, may have substantially and adversely influenced CVD trends [2]. While age-standardized CVD mortality and incidence rates decreased by 16.8% and 46.5% globally from 1990 to 2019, the global absolute number of incident cases and CVD deaths increased, respectively, by 77.1% and 53.8% in the same period, especially in low, low-middle, and middle sociodemographic index (SDI) regions [5]. According to the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021, ischemic heart disease (IHD) ranked as the second leading cause of disability-adjusted life-years globally and was the foremost cause of mortality, accounting for nearly 9 million deaths worldwide in that year [4,6]. Notably, the age-standardized rate of mortality due to IHD was lowest in the high SDI regions - 51.0 per 100,000 population (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 44.9–54.2) - and highest in the low-middle SDI quintile, particularly in North Africa and the Middle East, where it reached 202.8 per 100,000 population, highlighting how the global burden of IHD is exacerbated by socio-demographic disadvantages, including limited access to effective healthcare systems and inadequate implementation of primary prevention strategies [3,6,7].
IHD arises from the interplay between structural and functional alterations in the coronary arteries and the myocardium [8]. Together with ischemic stroke and peripheral arterial disease, IHD is classified under atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD), which share a common pathophysiological hallmark: atherosclerosis [9,10]. Atherosclerosis, characterized by localized thickening of artery walls due to intimal deposits of low-density lipoprotein, immune and vascular cell types, and extracellular matrix proteins, may lead to the development of atherosclerotic plaques in the aorta and its major distributing branches, including the coronary arteries [8,9]. Atherosclerotic plaques are central for clinical manifestations of ASCVD, ranging from stable ischemia such as chronic coronary syndrome, which may occur when plaques restrict blood flow, to more acute events resulting from plaque rupture or occlusion, including angina pectoris, transient ischemic attacks, and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) [9,10].
Both genetic and lifestyle determinants contribute to modulating the risk of IHD [11]. Individuals in the highest quintile of polygenic risk scores were shown to have a 91% increased risk of incident coronary events compared to those in the lowest quintile [11]. Importantly, adherence to a favorable lifestyle - defined as meeting at least three of the following criteria: absence of obesity, no current smoking, regular physical activity, and a healthy diet - was associated with a 46% lower relative risk of coronary events, even among individuals at high genetic risk [11]. Consistently, in addition to age, which is associated with a sharp increase in IHD risk, particularly in individuals aged 70 and older [7], a wide array of risk factors accelerate the development of atherosclerosis and, consequently, the risk of IHD [20], including hypertension [12], hypercholesterolemia [13], high fasting plasma glucose (FPG) [14], high body mass index (BMI) [15], smoking [16], dietary factors (e.g., processed and high-sodium foods typical of Westernized dietary patterns , inadequate intake of fruits and vegetables occurring in low SDI world regions) [17] and environmental pollution (e.g., air pollutants, toxic metals) [18,19].
The World Health Organization estimated that, in 2019, exposure to selected chemicals accounted for 2 million deaths and 53 million DALYs, nearly half of which were attributable to CVD [21]. Phthalic acid esters, or phthalates, are used as plasticizers in a wide range of consumer and industrial products including children’s toys, cosmetics, construction materials, food contact materials, and medical devices, to enhance material flexibility and durability [22,23]. Global production of phthalates increased from approximately 2.7 to 6 million tons between 2007 and 2017, and it is currently estimated at approximately 11 million tons, with continued growth driven by low production costs and the absence of affordable alternatives [24,25,26]. As phthalates are not covalently bound to the polymer matrix, they can be gradually released into environmental media (soil, water, and air) through abrasion and leaching, and, owing to their semi-volatile nature, also via evaporation [26]. Phthalates are among the 1,400 chemicals classified as potential endocrine disruptors, capable of significantly interfering with the endocrine system of animals and humans by mimicking or blocking the receptors of endogenous hormones [27,28]. In addition to associations with reproductive and neurodevelopmental health outcomes, as well as adverse birth outcomes (including low birth weight and preterm birth), emerging evidence suggests a possible role of phthalates in the development of obesity, type 2 diabetes (T2D), hypertension, atherosclerosis, and CVD [29,30,31]. Phthalate-induced cardiotoxicity may involve oxidative stress, hormonal effects, cardiomyocyte apoptosis, mitochondrial dysfunction, lipid accumulation well as inflammation-related mechanisms [30,32,33,34,35]. This review critically evaluates the current epidemiological evidence linking phthalate exposure to IHD, explores the underlying biological mechanisms, and identifies research gaps and future directions aimed at strengthening preventive strategies against IHD development.

2. Phthalates: An Overview

Phthalates are chemically defined as esters of 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid, formed through the reaction of alcohols with phthalic anhydride [36]. At room temperature, they are colorless and odorless compounds characterized by low melting points and high boiling points (>250 °C), properties largely influenced by the length of their alkyl chains [36]. Based on molecular weight, phthalates can be categorized into low-molecular weight (LMW) phthalates, including butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP), di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), diisobutyl phthalate (DIBP), and dimethyl phthalate (DMP) and high-molecular-weight (HMW) phthalates, comprising 2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP), diisononyl phthalate (DINP), and dinoctyl phthalate (DOP), among which BBP, DBP, DEHP, and DINP are the most widely used [37]. Phthalates are primarily added to enhance the durability and flexibility of plastics and vinyl and to prolong the persistence of fragrances [37]. Consequently, phthalates are present in a wide range of products, including coatings, vinyl flooring, food packaging, food processing materials, toys (typically containing HMW phthalates), as well as paints, adhesives, medical devises, cosmetics, shampoos, and perfumes (commonly containing LMW phthalates) [38].
Phthalates can accumulate in the environment as a result of manufacturing, consumption, improper waste segregation and disposal, sewage discharge, and, under certain conditions such as temperature, pH, contact time and type of interaction, the degradation of phthalate-containing products [38,39]. Owing to their semi-volatile nature, non-covalent association with polymers, and pronounced hydrophobicity, phthalates can readily migrate from their original matrix into soil, surface water, and groundwater, thereby posing a significant risk to both ecosystems and human health [38,39]. DEHP and DBP are the predominant phthalate species in aquatic systems, sediments, and soil, and they tend to bioaccumulate in aquatic invertebrates and fish and subsequently biomagnify along the food chain [40]. In the atmosphere, DIBP and DBP are the most representative species in the gas phase, whereas DEHP is predominant in the dust phase [40] (Figure 2). Importantly, the ecotoxicity of LMW phthalates appears to be higher than that of HMW species, largely due to their greater bioaccumulation potential [40].
Figure 1. Sources and fate of phthalates in the environmental media. Image generated with AI Microsoft Copilot 365. Abbreviations: DBP: di-n-butyl phthalate; DEHP: 2-ethylhexyl phthalate; DIBP: 2-ethylhexyl phthalate.
Figure 1. Sources and fate of phthalates in the environmental media. Image generated with AI Microsoft Copilot 365. Abbreviations: DBP: di-n-butyl phthalate; DEHP: 2-ethylhexyl phthalate; DIBP: 2-ethylhexyl phthalate.
Preprints 197171 g001
Human exposure primarily occurs through food (up to 74%, [41]) - particularly items high in animal fat, highly processed, or canned products – as well as drinking water stored in plastic and microwavable containers, dermal absorption of household and personal care products and, to a lesser extent, inhalation of contaminated vapors and dust [36,38]. Dietary exposure and food packaging films often contain HMW compounds (e.g., DEHP), along with elevated levels of DBP and DEP [42]. Daily dietary intake in adults is estimated to contribute between 1 and 4,2 µg/kg body weight (bw)/day of DEHP [43]. DEHP has also been detected in house dust at median concentrations of approximately 700 mg/kg, with levels exceeding 3,400 mg/kg in some samples [44,45]. Infants and toddlers are particularly vulnerable, as they incidentally ingest small amounts of dust and soil and frequently mouth plastic objects for several hours per day. Infants and toddlers are known to incidentally ingest small amounts of dust and soil, as well as mouth plastic objects for up to six hours per day [45]. This hand-to-mouth behavior can result in maximum exposures to DEHP and DINP exceeding 100 µg/kg bw/day—substantially higher than the tolerable daily intake (TDI) established for DEHP [36,45]. Additional exposure to phthalates may occur via medical devices made of polyvinyl chloride during procedures such as intravenous drug or total parenteral infusion, enteral feeding, cardiopulmonary bypass, haemodialysis, and blood transfusion [39]. Notably, DEHP released from medical devices can surpass the TDI, as may reach up to 21% of the device’s total DEHP content [39]. Once absorbed, phthalates undergo hydrolysis and oxidation, followed by conjugation, producing metabolites that are primarily excreted in urine [39]. These metabolites can be detected for up to 48 hours, with half-lives ranging from 4 to 24 hours, depending on the specific phthalate – HMW compounds exhibiting lower elimination - and the metabolite measured [39,46].

2.1. Phthalate Regulations

The extensive use of phthalates, together with growing concerns about their harmful effects on human health, has prompted many countries to implement regulatory measures [47]. The European Union (EU), the world’s second-largest economy, was the first to introduce temporary restrictions on several phthalates - BBP, DEHP, DINP, di-iso-decyl phthalate (DIDP), and di-n-octyl phthalate (DnOP) - in children’s toys more than 25 years ago [48] (Table 1). The Europan Chemical Agency, in particular, coordinates the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), the EU’s primary legislative framework for protecting human health and the environment from chemical risks [49,50]. In 2006, Directive 2005/84/EC made permanent the restriction of DEHP, DnBP, and butylbenzyl phthalate (BBzP) in all toys and childcare articles (Annex XVII to REACH regulation No 1907/2006) [51]. Furthermore, DBP, DIBP, BBP, and DEHP—classified in the EU as Substances of Very High Concern and included in the Annex XIV authorization list due to their well-documented reproductive toxicity and endocrine-disrupting properties - have been restricted since 2020 to a maximum concentration of 0.1% by weight in plasticized material in all plastic products [49,52]. In 2019, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, and Processing Aids issued an updated assessment establishing a TDI of 0.05 mg/kg body weight per day, expressed as DEHP equivalents, for DBP, BBP, DEHP, and DINP, based on their shared reproductive effects (i.e., reduction of fetal testosterone) 53]. For DIDP, the Panel maintained its individual TDI of 0.15 mg/kg body weight per day, based on liver toxicity [52]. EFSA also concluded that dietary exposure to these phthalates is four to seven times lower than the TDI for DBP, BBP, DEHP, and DINP, and approximately 1,500 times lower than the TDI for DIDP [53]. EU Regulation No. 2021/2045 further expanded the scope of uses prohibited under entry No. 4 of REACH Annex XIV, setting 27 May 2025 as the sunset date for DEHP use in medical devices [54]. More recently, Regulation (EU) 2023/2482, extended the permitted use of DEHP in medical devices until 1 July 2030, provided that applications for authorization are submitted before 1 January 2029, thereby ensuring continued availability of essential medical devices during the transition to DEHP-free alternatives [55].
In December 2019, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) classified BBP, DBP, DEHP, DIBP, dicyclohexyl phthalate (DCHP) as High-Priority Substances, initiating formal risk evaluations [56]. Last year, the US EPA released the final risk evaluation for DIDP, identifying an unreasonable risk of injury to the health of female workers of reproductive age, but no risk for consumers, the general population, or the environment [57]. In contrast, the final risk evaluation for DINP concluded that the compound poses an unreasonable risk to human health, including developmental toxicity, hepatotoxicity, and cancer at higher exposure levels [58] (Table 1).
Finally, beginning this year and in alignment with European regulations, the China RoHS Regulation will restrict four phthalates - BBP, DBP, DEHP, and DIDP – to a maximum concentration of 0.1% by mass in electrical and electronic products [59] (Table 1)

2.2. Health Effects and Toxicity of Phthalates

Humans are exposed to environmental mixtures of phthalates, which - even at low doses - may exert biological effects through additive, synergistic, or antagonistic interactions, a phenomenon known as non-monotonic toxicity [60]. Over the past two decades, accumulating evidence has reinforced the endocrine-disrupting properties of phthalates [40]. Due to their structural similarity to endogenous steroid and thyroid hormones, phthalates can inhibit or overstimulate hormone receptors, thereby altering normal hormonal responsiveness [39].
Consequently, prenatal exposure to phthalates may impair male reproductive functions and contribute to the so-called “phthalate syndrome” in male rats or “testicular dysgenesis syndrome” in humans by disrupting the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis and interfering with the development and function of Leydig and Sertoli cells [40,60]. These disruptions have been associated with reduced semen volume [61], increased risk of subfertility [62], external genital malformations (cryptorchidism, hypospadias, shortened anogenital distance [63,64,65]), as well as testicular cancer [66]. In women, phthalate exposure has been linked to alterations in menstrual cycle length [4,67], pubertal timing [68], decreased ovarian reserve [69], and increased risk of the polycystic ovary syndrome [70] and endometriosis [71]. The xenoestrogenic properties of phthalates may also disrupt estrogen signaling, thereby promoting breast carcinogenesis and tumor progression [72].
Exposure during pregnancy may adversely affect the maternal thyroid system by interfering with the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis, resulting in altered thyroid hormone levels [73,74]. Because phthalates can cross the placenta and influence embryonic and fetal development [60], such alterations may contribute to adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in offspring, including lower cognitive and psychomotor performances, and a possible increased risk of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder [75,76,77]. Moreover, the immunosuppressive effects of phthalates may increase susceptibility to allergies, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [78,79,80,81].
Exposure to certain phthalates and their metabolites has also been strongly associated with insulin resistance – mediated by mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress [40,82,83] – as well as with T2D [84], obesity [85], and metabolic syndrome [86]. Importantly, obesity, dyslipidemia, low-grade inflammation, endothelial dysfunction and hypertension are all well-established predisposing factors for atherosclerosis and CVD [87].

3. Phthalates Exposure and Ischemic Heart Disease: Epidemiological Evidence

Although not yet fully elucidated, emerging evidence suggests a potential risk of IHD associated with phthalate exposure (Table 2). As discussed in Section 1, IHD develops from atherosclerosis, a chronic inflammatory condition affecting large and medium-sized arteries [88]. A Swedish cross-sectional study was the first to examine the association between ten circulating phthalate metabolites and four markers of atherosclerosis measured in both carotid arteries [89]. Among the 1,016 participants aged 70 years, four of the ten metabolites - mono-isobutyl phthalate (MiBP, metabolite of DIBP), mono-methyl phthalate (MMP, metabolite of DMP), mono-ethyl phthalate (MEP, metabolite of DEP), and mono-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP, metabolite of DEHP) - were detectable in serum in all but 12 individuals [89]. Overall, 33.8% of participants exhibited unilateral carotid plaque, while 26.9% had bilateral plaque [89]. MMP levels were significantly associated with carotid plaques in an inverted U-shaped manner, even after adjustment for multiple risk factors. This finding suggests that DMP - primarily used in cosmetics and personal care products - may exert a direct atherosclerotic effect not mediated by traditional determinants of atherosclerosis (e.g., HDL- and LDL-cholesterol, serum triglycerides, smoking) [89,90]. Non-monotonic dose–response relationships, which may arise from opposing effects mediated by receptors with different affinities, receptor desensitization, or negative feedback at higher doses, have been reported for several chemicals, including phthalates, bisphenol A, polychlorinated biphenyls, pesticides, and dioxins, particularly in relation to their endocrine activity [91,92]. The observation of a similar pattern in atherosclerosis further supports the hypothesis that phthalates may exert a genuine effect on cardiovascular health [89]. MEP, MiBP, and MMP levels were also significantly and positively associated with the echogenicity (gray-scale media, GSM) of the intima–media complex (IM-GSM), and for MiBP and MMP also with plaque GSM, whereas MEHP showed an inverse association [89]. Notably, the GSM of the intima–media complex in the common carotid artery is closely related to the echogenicity of overt plaques [93]. Moreover, IM-GSM is associated with cardiovascular risk markers such as dyslipidemia, inflammation, and oxidative stress, which differ from traditional risk factors (BMI, blood pressure, smoking) that are linked to increased carotid intima–media thickness (IMT) [94]. IMT is a well-established and reliable predictor of carotid plaque prevalence; however, it has the limitation of including the media, a vessel layer that does not change in size during atherosclerosis progression [94,95]. Interestingly, none of the phthalate metabolites, except MMP, showed a significant inverse association with IMT, suggesting that phthalates may be more strongly involved in processes occurring within the intima alone rather than across both the intima and media layers [89].
A further investigation by Olsén and colleagues [95] examined the association between circulating levels of selected phthalate metabolites - MEP, MiBP, MEHP, and MMP -and coronary risk, as assessed by the Framingham Risk Score (FRS), in 1,016 Swedish adults aged 70 years. The FRS incorporates six traditional risk factors, i.e., age, sex, HDL- and total cholesterol, hypertension, and smoking, to estimate an individual’s 10-year risk of developing coronary heart disease (CHD) [96]. Serum levels of MEHP and MMP were significantly associated with LDL-cholesterol, MEP with diastolic blood pressure, MiBP with fasting glucose, and MMP with smoking [95]. However, despite these associations with individual CHD risk factors, only MMP showed a potential, though not statistically significant, association with the overall FRS [95].
A subsequent study [97] conducted in the same Swedish cohort investigated whether serum levels of monobenzyl phthalate (MBzP) - a metabolite of BBP, a phthalate widely used as a plasticizer in the polyvinyl chloride industry and also present in food conveyor belts, vinyl gloves, and adhesives [98] - were associated with markers of carotid atherosclerosis. MBzP showed a significant positive association with IMT, both as a continuous and categorical variable, even after adjustment for multiple cardiovascular risk factors [97]. It was also inversely and independently associated with both IM-GSM and plaque GSM, suggesting that higher MBzP levels may correspond to increased lipid infiltration within the vascular wall [97]. Similar to MMP, MBzP was associated with IMT but not with the number of overt atherosclerotic plaques, indicating a potential role in the early stages of atherosclerosis [89,97].
Overall, discrepancies within and between the two studies may reflect the weaker associations observed for GSM, since this parameter can only be assessed in individuals with plaques, whereas IM-GSM can be evaluated in nearly all participants [97]. They may also indicate that different phthalates exert distinct effects on the vascular wall [97].
Another cross-sectional study involving 793 Taiwanese adolescents and young adults aged 12–30 years - with and without childhood elevated blood pressure (EBP) -selected from an annual urine screening program examined the association between urinary DEHP metabolite levels and circulating endothelial microparticles (EMPs: CD62E and CD31⁺/CD42a⁻) and platelet microparticles (PMPs: CD62P and CD31⁺/CD42a⁺) [99]. These microparticles, vesicles measuring 0.1–1 µm in diameter, originate from cell apoptosis and inflammatory processes implicated in atherosclerosis development and serve as surrogate biomarkers of endothelial injury and vascular pathology [100,101]. The study also assessed CD14, a pattern-recognition receptor central to innate immunity and considered a potential risk factor for CHD [102]. Among the DEHP metabolites measured - MEHP, mono(ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate (MEHHP), and mono(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate (MEOHP) - MEHP was the only one to show a significant positive association with serum levels of CD31⁺/CD42a⁻, CD31⁺/CD42a⁺, and CD14, even after adjustment for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors including BMI, systolic blood pressure, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, HOMA-IR, and smoking [99]. Specifically, interquartile increases in urinary MEHP were associated with 6.68% and 3.65% increases in EMPs and PMPs, respectively [99]. Importantly, urinary MEHP alone was significantly associated with higher BMI and HOMA-IR, with younger and female participants exhibiting higher concentrations, likely reflecting greater use of cosmetics and other DEHP-containing consumer products [99]. CD31⁺/CD42a⁺ levels increased significantly with HOMA-IR, whereas CD31⁺/CD42a⁻ was positively associated with BMI, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, HOMA-IR, and systolic blood pressure, and inversely associated with HDL-cholesterol [99]. Collectively, these findings suggest that MEHP may contribute to atherosclerosis by preferentially promoting endothelial and platelet apoptosis, potentially through a reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated, mitochondria-dependent pathway, followed by inflammatory activation (see Section 4) [99,103]. This cascade may increase endothelial monolayer permeability, facilitating smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation and migration, as well as the infiltration of lipids and monocytes into the intima, ultimately contributing to plaque development and the onset of atherosclerosis [99,104].
From the same nationwide urine screening program for renal health among Taiwanese schoolchildren aged 6–18 years, Su et al. recruited 789 participants—38.4% with EBP—to assess the association between seven urinary phthalate metabolites (MMP, MEP, MBzP, MEHP, MEHHP, MEHOP, and mono-n-butyl phthalate [MnBP]) and IMT [105]. Consistent with previous findings [97], urinary MEHP levels were positively associated with major cardiovascular risk factors, including BMI, waist circumference, triglycerides, diastolic blood pressure, and the prevalence of diabetes and hypertension [105]. Multiple linear regression analyses revealed a dose–response relationship between mean and maximal carotid IMT across different carotid segments and log-transformed urinary levels of MEHP, MnBP, and the sum of DEHP metabolites (∑DEHP: MEHP, MEHHP, MEHOP), after adjustment for age, sex, BMI, C-reactive protein (CRP), biochemical indicators (fasting glucose, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides), childhood EBP, physical activity, smoking and alcohol habits, and socioeconomic status. These findings provide evidence of a dose–response relationship between phthalate exposure and subclinical atherosclerosis in young populations [105]. Additionally, multivariate regression analysis showed that individuals in the highest quartile of urinary MEHP had a 7.39-fold increased risk of elevated carotid IMT (95% CI: 4.16–13.12) compared with those in the lowest quartile [105]. ∑DEHP and MnBP exhibited similar, though less pronounced, associations, with increased risks of 2.80 (95% CI: 1.65–4.75) and 2.46 (95% CI: 1.46–4.14), respectively [105].
A subsequent cross-sectional study involving 783 Taiwanese participants aged 12–30 years examined the relationship between urinary concentrations of DEHP metabolites, carotid IMT, and global DNA methylation levels - quantified as the ratio of 5-methyl-2-deoxycytidine (5mdC) to 2-deoxyguanine (dG) - given the potential involvement of genomic DNA methylation in the early stages of CVD pathogenesis [106,107,108]. Supporting this hypothesis, a large longitudinal, multi-cohort epigenome-wide investigation including 11,461 participants identified methylation at 52 cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) sites as being associated with increased risk of CHD and AMI events [109]. In the study by Lin et al. [106], MEHP was positively associated with HOMA-IR, consistent with previous findings [99,105]. Global methylation levels, assessed in leukocytes from 71.8% of participants, were significantly and positively correlated with both HOMA-IR and carotid IMT, but not with other CVD risk factors [106]. Multiple linear regression analyses showed that urinary MEHP levels were significantly and positively associated with both 5mdC/dG and carotid IMT after adjustment for age, sex, BMI, smoking status, systolic blood pressure, HOMA-IR, triglycerides, and LDL-cholesterol, whereas MEHHP and MEOHP showed no significant associations [106]. The association between MEHP and carotid IMT was particularly strong when carotid thickness exceeded the 75th percentile (IR = 1.40, p < 0.001) [106]. Similarly, the association between MEHP and 5mdC/dG was stronger above the median (OR = 1.44, p < 0.001) than below it (OR = 1.13, p = 0.155) [106]. Structural equation modelling further indicated that MEHP was positively associated with both carotid IMT and 5mdC/dG (p < 0.001), and that 5mdC/dG was itself positively associated with IMT [106]. These findings suggest that MEHP exerts both direct and indirect effects on carotid IMT, with global DNA methylation acting as a mediator in DEHP-induced atherosclerosis, although the lack of locus-specific methylation data limits mechanistic interpretation (see Section 4) [106].
Using data from the 2003–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a population-based survey assessing health and nutritional status across the United States, Zhang et al. [32] evaluated the association between phthalate exposure -measured through urinary levels of 11 metabolites - and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) in 2,241 subjects. This assay detects minimal increases in circulating cardiac troponin, a highly specific biomarker of myocardial injury, in more than 50% of asymptomatic individuals, with a coefficient of variation below 10% at the 99th percentile in healthy subjects, making it a robust tool for cardiovascular risk stratification [110]. Notably, non-ischemic myocardial injury is the most common cause of elevated hs-cTnI and is associated with poor prognosis in nearly 75% of affected individuals [111]. Zhang and co-workers reported significant increases in hs-cTnI levels (3.4–4.0%) associated with a one-standard-deviation increase in urinary concentrations of ∑DEHP (MEHP, MECPP, MEHHP, MEOHP), ∑LMWP (MMP, MEP, MBP, MiBP), ∑HMWP (∑DEHP, MCPP, MBzP), as well as MECPP and MEP, after adjusting for BMI, glycated hemoglobin, HDL- and total cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) [32]. Marked heterogeneity was observed across sex and age groups: ∑LMWP and MEP were strongly associated with hs-cTnI among female children and adolescents (6–19 years), whereas ∑HMWP, ∑DEHP, and individual DEHP metabolites were significantly associated with hs-cTnI in male adults aged ≥20 years, suggesting age- and sex-specific susceptibility to the endocrine and metabolic effects of phthalates [32]. Importantly, co-exposure to phthalate mixtures was also significantly and positively associated with hs-cTnI (5.6% increase per one-unit rise in the weighted quantile sum), with MECPP contributing most strongly, followed by MMP and MEP [32]. Given the significant associations of ∑HMWP, ∑DEHP, and their metabolites, except MEP, with BMI, HOMA-IR, and eGFR, these findings suggest that obesity, insulin resistance, and hyperglycemia may mediate the potentially cardiotoxic effects of phthalates on the myocardium [32].
Su et al. were the first to investigate the relationship between urinary concentrations of phthalate metabolites and confirmed CHD in a case–control study including 180 subjects randomly selected from 336 CHD patients under 60 years of age, along with 360 age- and sex-matched non-CHD controls [112]. Stratification of CHD patients by discharge date after diagnosis revealed that those who were hospitalized and immediately discharged exhibited the highest geometric mean urinary levels of MEHP, MEHHP, MEHOP, and ∑DEHP, followed by patients discharged within fewer than 3 days, and finally those discharged 3 days or more after diagnosis [112]. This pattern suggests elevated DEHP exposure among hospitalized patients, likely due to its extensive use in medical devices, as discussed in Section 2 [112]. In contrast, MEP levels were significantly higher in subjects discharged on or after the third day compared with those discharged earlier [112]. Notably, LMW phthalates such as DEP and DBP are used as coatings for certain oral medications (e.g., stool softeners and laxatives), which can result in urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations up to ten times higher among users than non-users [113]. When restricting the analysis to CHD patients discharged on or after the third day, creatinine-adjusted levels of MEHP, MnBP, and MiBP were significantly higher in patients than in controls [112]. After adjustment for age, sex, BMI, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, T2D, statin use, smoking, and alcohol consumption, individuals in the highest tertiles of MEHP (Odds Ratio - OR = 2.77, 95% CI: 1.22–6.28, p = 0.021) and MiBP (OR = 3.19, 95% CI: 1.41–7.21, p = 0.010) had a significantly higher risk of CHD compared with those in the lowest tertiles [112]. Furthermore, levels of hs-CRP, fibrinogen, and D-dimer increased significantly across quartiles of urinary concentrations of individual DEHP metabolites and ∑DEHP, with the exception of fibrinogen, which showed no association with MEHP [112]. These biomarkers are key contributors to atherosclerosis. Hs-CRP, a marker of chronic inflammation, plays a central role across all stages of atherosclerosis and correlates strongly with disease burden [114]. Fibrinogen participates in inflammation, intercellular interactions, and cell migration; elevated levels promote macrophage, leukocyte, and platelet recruitment, contributing to plaque formation, SMC proliferation, and angiogenesis, making it a critical ASCVD risk factor [115]. Similarly, D-dimer, a degradation product of cross-linked fibrin reflecting activated coagulation and fibrinolysis, has been associated with ischemic cardiovascular events, including AMI and the severity of coronary artery disease [116]. In this context, the significant associations between urinary DEHP metabolites, CHD, and elevated inflammatory and thrombosis markers further support a potential role for phthalates in the etiopathogenesis of atherosclerosis [112]. However, the authors acknowledged that increases in inflammatory markers may partly reflect acute or subacute events directly related to CHD itself [112].
In summary, phthalates - particularly DEHP, and to a lesser extent DMP and DiBP -may exert detrimental effects on vascular health either by directly altering carotid IMT or through interconnected mechanisms involving hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, pre-diabetic metabolic disturbances, endothelial and platelet apoptosis, and changes in global DNA methylation. Phthalate exposure also appears to be associated with the development and severity of IHD by promoting inflammation, atherosclerotic plaque formation, and thrombosis. Although these findings provide valuable insight into the potential cardiotoxicity of phthalates, the cross-sectional design of available studies limits causal inference. This underscores the urgent need for prospective, large-scale investigations to validate these preliminary observations and clarify the long-term cardiovascular consequences of phthalate exposure.

4. Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Phthalates-Induced Ischemic Heart Disease

Exposure to phthalates induces remarkable cellular and molecular alterations that involve pathways, organelles and macromolecules crucial for cellular physiology and viability. These imbalances and modifications significantly contribute to the onset of a plethora of diseases, including IHD. The main alterations are described in the following paragraphs, and the mechanistic studies are summarized in Table 3.

4.1. Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Apoptosis

The interplay between oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis represents a hierarchical and self-amplifying pathophysiological cascade central to CVD onset and progression [117]. Increasing in vitro studies demonstrates that phthalates and their metabolites could trigger one or more steps of this cascade. Interestingly, Ban et al. demonstrated that MEHP exposure leads to a dose-dependent increase in intracellular ROS, depletion of the antioxidant glutathione (GSH), and elevation of malondialdehyde (MDA), a biomarker of lipid peroxidation, and ROS-induced membrane injury, indicating a substantial oxidative stress triggered by MEHP. This phenomenon results in loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, promoting cytochrome c release, and activating the intrinsic apoptotic pathway in human umbilical vein endothelial cells [103]. The intrinsic apoptotic cascade coming from the collapse of mitochondrial membrane potential can be promoted by cathepsin B release from lysosome, after the stimulation of autophagy [118], as result of the oxidative stress due to MEHP exposure in another model of endothelial cells [119]. The authors demonstrated that MEHP induces autophagy in EA.hy926 cells in a dose-dependent manner through the Akt1 pathway, leading to increased autophagosome formation and autophagic cell death, and in this process, ROS played an important role.
Increases in ROS and impairment of antioxidant systems were also observed in cardiomyocytes exposed to DEHP. This phthalate triggers inflammatory responses through upregulation of prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2/cyclooxygenase 2 , which promotes pro-inflammatory signaling, and simultaneously activates apoptotic pathways, resulting in increased cell death [120]. In addition, molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation studies demonstrated that DEP and its metabolite MEP bind the antioxidant enzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD), inducing structural changes that destabilize the protein and inhibit its catalytic activity, thereby weakening cellular antioxidant defenses and increasing susceptibility to oxidative stress [121]. These findings offer valuable insights into the molecular binding mechanisms and structural implications for SOD, establishing a foundation for understanding the potential health risks related to oxidative stress and the toxicological regulation of PAEs and their metabolites.
Animal studies have shown that phthalate exposure is associated with upregulation of inflammatory mediators, further exacerbating cardiovascular injury and promoting conditions such as atherosclerosis [122]. In mice, DEHP exposure markedly increases cardiac oxidative stress markers including MDA and protein carbonyl levels, indicating ROS overproduction and lipid peroxidation, and also disrupts lipid homeostasis by elevating total cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL-cholesterol, while reducing HDL-cholesterol, ultimately raising the atherogenic index and atherosclerosis risk [123]. Disturbances in cholesterol homeostasis, along with inflammation in endothelial cells, was previously observed in a mouse model chronically treated with DEHP [124]. Furthermore, DEHP exposure has also been shown to cause myocardial injury in terms of disorganized fibers, collagen deposition, and elevated serum markers of cardiac damage (creatine kinase MB) and inflammation (CRP). Mechanistically, DEHP and its metabolite MEHP activate the SPHK1/S1PR2 sphingolipid pathway, which triggers cardiomyocyte pyroptosis and subsequent cell death [125].
Transcriptomic and flow cytometry analyses in rats exposed to DMP revealed ROS-mediated activation of both intrinsic (Bcl-2 family, Bax/Bcl-2 ratio) and extrinsic (Fas/FasL pathway) apoptotic cascades, culminating in caspase-dependent cardiomyocyte apoptosis [126]. Phthalates also promoted the upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines and activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, leading to increased interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18 production, as well as enhanced neutrophil and macrophage infiltration in cardiac tissue after myocardial injury [127]. Murine models exposed to DEHP further exhibited oxidative stress, as indicated by increased lipid peroxidation and mitochondrial damage, alongside activation of the Nrf2/heme oxygenase-1 pathway and induction of ferroptosis in cardiomyocytes [128]. Finally, exposure to DBP, particularly when combined with a high-fat diet, exacerbated cardiac fibrosis and dysfunction in rats by inducing oxidative stress, characterized by elevated ROS and lipid peroxidation (MDA) and depletion of antioxidant defenses (GSH). This redox imbalance led to membrane damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, and activation of inflammatory and pyroptotic pathways (upregulation of NLRP3 inflammasome, caspase-1, and gasdemin D), while also disrupting lipid metabolism and endocrine homeostasis, ultimately promoting structural myocardial damage and cardiotoxicity relevant to CVD and IHD pathogenesis [129]. DEHP also promotes vascular inflammation by inducing tissue factor–bearing microparticle release from human M1 macrophages via activation of the TGF-β1/Smad/plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) signaling pathway. This mechanism increases tissue factor expression and the formation of procoagulant microparticles, thereby linking DEHP exposure to inflammatory and thrombotic processes that contribute to the development and progression of cardiovascular disease [130].
In a human cohort of more than 1000 individuals, urinary concentrations of several phthalate metabolites (MEP, MBP, MiBP, MBzP, and the sum of six phthalate metabolites) were positively correlated with higher blood pressure and increased prevalence of hypertension, attributing the higher cardiovascular risk to the phthalate-induced oxidative stress with elevated levels of oxidative stress biomarkers, specifically 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine and malondialdehyde (MDA) [131]. Elevated MDA, together with reduced SOD activity were also observed in association with higher urinary MEHP levels in a previous case-control study enrolling CHD patients [35], supporting the link between this phthalate-induced oxidative stress and cardiovascular pathology. In a younger population, a positive association was also observed between MEHP levels and the presence of endothelial and platelet microparticles, which are generated during cell death and inflammation processes involved in atherosclerosis development. Urinary concentrations of DEHP metabolites were compared to serum markers indicative of endothelial apoptosis (CD31+/CD42a-), platelet apoptosis (CD31+/CD42a+), and activation of monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils (CD14) [99].
Moreover, CHD patients with elevated urinary levels of DEHP metabolites exhibited higher levels of atherothrombotic and inflammatory markers (high-sensitivity CRP -hs-CRP, fibrinogen, and D-dimer), supporting a mechanistic link between phthalate exposure,vascular inflammation, and thrombosis [132]. Oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis at the cardiovascular level were indicated as molecular mechanisms involved in phthalates-induced CVD from a network toxicology analysis with pathway enrichment and protein-protein interaction that identified phosphatidylinositol 3' -kinase (PI3K)-Akt and JAK-STAT signaling (inflammation and cell survival), BCL2 (apoptosis regulation), and PIK3 catalytic subunit (inflammatory and survival signaling) as central targets [33]. Molecular docking analyses confirmed strong binding affinities between phthalate metabolites and these proteins, reinforcing the plausibility that phthalate exposure contribute to cardiovascular toxicity by promoting oxidative stress, inflammatory signaling, and apoptosis in cardiac and vascular cells [33].

4.2. Mitochondrial DNA Alterations and Dysfunction

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is a small, circular, double-stranded genome (~16.6 kb in humans) encoding 13 essential subunits of the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) system, as well as 22 tRNAs and 2 rRNAs required for intramitochondrial protein synthesis [133]. Each mitochondrion contains multiple copies of mtDNA, and each cell harbors hundreds to thousands of mtDNA copies, depending on its energetic demand. mtDNA copy number reflects the quantity of mitochondrial genomes per cell and can be used to indirectly measure mitochondrial function. Alteration in mtDNA copy number is closely associated with several diseases, including CVD [134]. Additionally, mtDNA copy number is currently regarded as an emerging biomarker of environmental exposure [135].
Cardiomyocytes, due to their exceptionally high requirement for ATP to sustain continuous contractile activity, are particularly enriched in mitochondria and mtDNA, making mitochondrial integrity critical for normal cardiac function [136,137]. Unlike nuclear DNA, mtDNA lacks protective histones and has limited DNA repair capacity, making it highly susceptible to damage induced by ROS, environmental toxicants, and metabolic stress. mtDNA injury can manifest as point mutations, large-scale deletions, strand breaks, or epigenetic alterations, ultimately compromising mitochondrial biogenesis and respiratory capacity [138,139]. Such damage directly compromised oxidative phosphorylation by impairing the expression and function of mitochondrially encoded subunits of the respiratory chain, leading to reduced electron transport efficiency and defective ATP production [140,141]. Consequently, dysfunctional mitochondria exhibit increased electron leakage and excessive generation of ROS, which further amplifies mtDNA damage and establishes a self-perpetuating cycle of mitochondrial oxidative stress [141,142].
It is well established that mitochondrial dysfunction is strongly correlated with the development and progression of CVD and IHD [140]. In vascular endothelial cells, this redox imbalance promotes endothelial dysfunction through reduced nitric oxide bioavailability, increased inflammation, and impaired vasodilatory capacity, key early events in atherogenesis [140]. In cardiomyocytes, chronic mitochondrial dysfunction and ATP depletion drive maladaptive myocardial remodeling, characterized by altered calcium handling, fibrosis, and progressive contractile dysfunction [140,142].
At the molecular level, phthalates interfere with mitochondrial redox homeostasis by increasing ROS production and impairing antioxidant defense systems, thereby exacerbating oxidative damage to mitochondrial membranes, proteins, and mtDNA. In detail, exposure to DEHP has been shown to disrupt mitochondrial dynamics and biogenesis, leading to defective oxidative phosphorylation and further reductions in mtDNA copy number [30,34], a surrogate marker of mitochondrial biogenesis and function. In vitro studies using zebrafish-derived cells showed that DBP exposure induces mitochondrial fragmentation, loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, and impaired ATP synthesis, reflecting a collapse of mitochondrial bioenergetic capacity [143].
Coherently, DBP during early developmental stages of zebrafish models induced mtDNA stress responses, characterized by increased mtDNA lesions, reduced mtDNA copy number, and activation of mitochondrial damage signaling pathways. Additionally, DBP-induced mtDNA damage triggeref the release of mtDNA into the cytosol, activating the cGAS-STING inflammatory signaling pathway and further linking mitochondrial injury to cellular inflammation [144]. These mitochondrial perturbations were shown to activate downstream cell-death pathways, including intrinsic apoptosis and inflammatory signaling cascades, thereby connecting phthalate-induced mitochondrial dysfunction to tissue injury [143,144].
A recent population-based studies demonstrated that reduced mtDNA copy number was strongly associated with increased risk of atherosclerosis and major cardiovascular events, supporting the central role for mtDNA integrity in CVD pathogenesis, as proved by the reduced leukocyte mtDNA copy number associated with a higher risk of incident CHD [134]. Moreover, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis encompassing multiple observational studies confirmed that lower mtDNA copy number was significantly associated with major risk for CVD (summary Relative Risk - RR 2.09, 95% CI 1.59-2.75), coronary heart disease (RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.29-2.24), heart failure (RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.15-1.79), stroke (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.08-3.28), and all-cause mortality (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.21-1.47), supporting its value as a robust biomarker of mitochondrial dysfunction and adverse cardiovascular outcomes [145].
Collectively, the convergence of oxidative stress, mtDNA damage, and bioenergetic failure provides a molecular framework through which phthalate exposure may contribute to cardiovascular pathology, highlighting environmental toxicants as critical and underappreciated determinants of cardiovascular disease risk, including IHD [33,34].

4.3. DNA Methylation and Non-Coding RNAs

DNA methylation is an epigenetic modification that refers to the covalent addition of a methyl group to the cytosine base within CpG dinucleotides, typically leading to transcriptional repression by restricting access of transcription factors and recruiting methyl-binding proteins that promote a closed chromatin conformation, thereby reducing gene accessibility and silencing gene expression [146].
Another major epigenetic mechanism involves non-coding RNAs, particularly microRNAs (miRNA) and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA). These molecules mainly exert post-transcriptional control by promoting mRNA degradation or inhibiting translation, but they can also interact with chromatin-modifying complexes to affect transcriptional regulation [147]. These epigenetic processes are responsive to both internal and external determinants, including environmental pollutants, and are recognized as key contributors to epigenetic reprogramming and heigthened CAD risk [148].
In vitro evidence indicates that DBP accelerates atherosclerosis through two distinct miRNA-mediated mechanisms. First, DBP exposure upregulates miR-139-5p, which directly targets and suppresses myocardin, a central transcriptional regulator of vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) contractile phenotype. This suppression promotes the phenotypic switch of VSMCs from a contractile to a synthetic state, a process that contributes to plaque formation and instability in atherosclerosis [149]. Second, DBP downregulates miR-137-3p, which normally inhibits specificity protein 1 (SP1). Reduced miR-137-3p leads to increased SP1 expression, which in turn upregulates monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1). Elevated MCP-1 enhances monocyte recruitment to the endothelium, a critical early event in atherogenesis [150].
Moreover, DEHP has also been shown to provoke epigenetic changes that promote atherogenesis. Liu et al. demonstrated that DEHP exposure increases expression of GAS5, a lncRNA that sequesters miR-145-5p, leading to pathological proliferation and enhanced apoptosis in a VSMC model, processes that may contribute to vascular damage and plaque instability and, ultimately, CAD progression [151]. In the same study, GAS5 knockdown reduced foam-cell formation from macrophages, supporting the role of this lncRNA in atherogenesis.
In mice, the effect of DEHP on DNA methylation status was shown to be significant even during perinatal period. Indeed, exposure to this phthalate results in the presence of thousands of differentially methylated regions and hundreds of differentially expressed genes that persistently alter cardiac cell type proportion and composition, influencing cardiovascular risk later in the life [152]. These results are consistent with the earlier observations of Svoboda et al. [153].
Worrying effects related to phthalate exposure on cardiovascular risk in offspring have also been documented in humans. A prospective cohort study found that higher urinary concentrations of phthalate metabolites (MMP, MEP and MEcPP) during the third trimester of pregnancy of 198 women were associated with elevated blood pressure of their children later when they were in preschool-age, and this relationship is mediated by DNA methylation changes in genes (e.g. ECE1, SCNN1G) related to hypertension risk [154].
Lin et al. demonstrated a positive correlation between urinary MEHP concentration in a group of young individuals, and carotid intima-media thickness, a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis, and increased global DNA methylation [106]. In the same cohort, elevated levels of apoptotic microparticles derived from vascular cells (CD31/CD42a and CD14) were also observed, suggesting that phthalate exposure may promote vascular cell apoptosis through global DNA methylation changes acting as mediators in this pathway [155]. Furthermore, several human studies indicate that phthalates can influence levels of miRNAs implicated in cardiovascular dysfunction and IHD. A panel study reported that several phthalate metabolites, in particular MMP and MBP, were associated with increased levels of some miRNAs, including miR-146a, which is linked to arterial stiffness [156], a marker and a mediator of cardiovascular risk, closely associated with atherosclerotic burden [157]. In a case-control study of CHD patients, urinary MEHP concentration correlated with higher levels of miR-155 and miR-208a, implicated in vascular inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and atherogenesis, in comparison to healthy controls [35].

4.4. Lipid Accumulation

Lipid accumulation is a fundamental pathological process underlying the development of IHD. The progressive retention of atherogenic lipoproteins within the arterial wall initiates and sustains chronic vascular inflammation, ultimately driving atherosclerotic plaque formation and progression. Elevated circulating lipid levels, particularly LDL -cholesterol, are strongly associated with plaque burden and represent a major, cumulative determinant of cardiovascular risk across the lifespan. Lipid accumulation actively promotes endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, VSMC proliferation, and plaque instability, thereby increasing susceptibility to acute ischemic events, such as MI [158].
Evidence from literature describes phthalates’ ability to trigger lipid accumulation and related metabolic processes. BBP promotes adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes by increasing both the number and size of lipid droplets in a dose-dependent manner, through the upregulation of key adipogenic transcription factors, including C/EBPα and PPARγ, as well as their downstream target genes and proteins, indicating activation of the adipogenic differentiation pathway. Metabolomic analysis revealed that BBP alters metabolic profiles by enhancing pathways involved in gluconeogenesis and fatty acid synthesis, both central to lipid accumulation [159]. The capability of BBP to enhance adipocytes differentiation was subsequently confirmed by Meruvu et al., who attributed this effect to elevated expression of miRNA-34a-5p signaling pathway [160]. Similarly, DEHP exposure activates PPARγ and upregulates its downstream target fatty acid binding protein 4 , promoting pathways involved in lipid accumulation in cardiomyogenic-differentiating P19 embryonal carcinoma cells [161].
Moreover, phthalates can facilitate initiation and progression of atherosclerotic plaque. DBP exposure upregulats cellular adhesion molecules and chemokines, leading to a marked increase in monocyte adhesion to the endothelium both in vitro and in vivo [162]. In macrophages, DEHP exposure enhances oxidized LDL uptake and foam cell formation, accelerating plaque development. Consistently, DEHP administration in ApoE-deficient mice leads to altered lipid profiles and a marked acceleration of atherosclerotic plaque progression [151].
Another animal study shed light on an interesting effect exerted by which DCHP may contribute to lipid dysregulation: it acts as a potent and selective agonist of the intestinal pregnane X receptor, leading to its activation, thereby upregulating genes involved in lipogenesis and ceramide synthesis [163].
A remarkable number of human studies, discussed in two systematic reviews and meta-analyses, highlight the correlation between phthalate exposure and conditions attributable to lipid accumulation and promoting IHD. In the first meta-analysis, Golestanzadeh et al. found that MBP, MBzP, MEHP, MMP, and MEOHP were associated with lipid accumulation in children and adolescents, as evidenced by significant correlations with increased BMI, waist circumference, LDL-cholesterol, and triglyceride levels [164]. In the second, Mérida et al. integrated data from nine cross-sectional observational studies involving 25,365 individuals, linking LMW and HMW phthalates and their metabolites (such as MEHP, MBzP, MiBP, and MMP) to higher odds of metabolic syndrome, a condition characterized by dysregulated lipid homeostasis, central obesity, insulin resistance, and elevated triglycerides, all established risk factors for atherosclerosis and IHD [73]. Furthermore, prenatal exposure to phthalates was shown to cause metabolic disorders in offspring. Indeed, maternal urinary concentrations of DEP, DBP, and DEHP metabolites were associated with higher BMI levels and a greater likelihood of childhood overweight or obesity [165], supporting the role of phthalates in cardiovascular risk.
Figure 2 summarizes cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying phthalates-induced ischemic heart disease.

5. The Present and Future of Research: Intelligent Approaches in Studying Phthalate Exposure and Cardiovascular Risk

In the last years, research around environmental health and related cardiovascular specificities have benefitted from the continuous, seamless integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) models and principles, especially in the field of Machine Learning (ML), to identify relationships between exposures, cardiometabolic pathways and clinical outcomes. Traditional approaches, based on classical statistics, have been the solution to investigate such relationships in the past, however failing at retrieving such relationships in case of non-linearity and higher complexity. Therefore, the adoption of such approaches, novel in the field, enables improving the common understanding around the mechanisms how phthalate exposure can contribute to CVD and IHD.

5.1. AI for Detecting and Modeling Phthalate Exposure and Health Outcomes

Analytics based on AI was recently applied with a mounting frequency to model the health effects of phthalates. Among those, a large-scale study was conducted in Taiwan using demographic and laboratory data collected from the Taiwan Biobank [166]. In this regard, the research developed a prediction model devoted to the examination of the relationship between phthalate esters (particularly DEHP), lifestyle factors, and disease outcomes. The model assessed the risk of developing certain diseases using several AI-based algorithms, including logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and Bayesian networks. According to the results obtained, phthalate esters showed a greater impact on bone and joint problems than on cardiovascular conditions. Furthermore, DEHP metabolites, such as mono(2-carboxymethylhexyl) phthalate, MnBP, and MEP, appear to leave higher residue in females than in males, with statistically significant differences. MEPlevels were also found to be lower in individuals who exercised regularly than those who did not, demonstrating that phthalate-related risk patterns differ by sex and physical activity levels [166].
Another key application of AI in this regard, even if not directly related to cardiovascular health, is the enhancement of environmental detection technologies. In particular, ML was embedded into an electrochemical aptasensing platform aimed at reliably analyzing DEHP concentrations in water at the upper, mid, and lower layers of 3 sites across South Korean rivers [167]. In fact, researchers failed to find satisfying solutions when solely relying on sensor application due to signal drift, biofouling, and limited specificity, especially with pH fluctuations. In that, ML-powered platform, using a Conventional Generative Adversarial Network (cGAN) model for data augmentation and a hybrid Phthalate Boosting (PLBoost) algorithm for a robust multi-layer concentration analysis, significantly improved the DEHP prediction accuracy (97.11%) compared to those of the Liquid–liquid extraction/gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (LLE-GC–MS) measurement, minimizing the fluctuating conditions [167].

5.2. AI in Cardiovascular Risk Prediction and IHD

In the last years, AI has quickly emerged as a main player to transform the paradigm of cardiovascular risk prediction in general and specifically when applied to IHD through the integration of multimodal, multiparametric data, and its typical enhanced capacity of modeling. In this regard, a literature review was recently published highlighting the role of AI in creating potentially useful models to improve IHD prevention relying on multimodal inputs including biomarkers, clinical records, data captured by wearable tools, and imaging [168]. Such models outperformed classical risk scores in terms of predictive accuracy, further supporting their use in personalization of preventive strategies.
More specifically, a Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) model, trained on Electronic Health Record (EHR)-derived data from more than 250,000 patients, outperformed traditional methods for atherosclerotic risk prediction (AUC: 0.835 vs. 0.775), and improved accuracy of other ML models thanks to its capability of handling missing data [169]. A set of ML models was also used to identify secondary CVD in a cohort of more than 32,000 patients, with the XGBoost performed best, with an AUC of 0.70 for all cases and 0.71 for those with atherosclerosis CVD, outperforming other ML models, which in turn performed better than traditional statistics. Also, thanks to ML approach, some additional risk factors for adverse events were identified, including education level and primary care visits [170]. However, such results must be considered cautiously due to the lack of standardization of some approaches and of validation in real-world test bench.
In terms of the discovery of biomarkers for CVD, ML can identify genetic variants of single nucleotide polymorphisms potentially overlooked by most traditional statistics. A Feature Selection algorithm, based on ML, can identify panels with 50 genetic markers to achieve 80% accuracy when combined with known risk factors [171]. In the same field, XGBoost was used to develop a protein-based risk model in the SMART derivation cohort and was validated in the Athero-Express cohort, outperforming (AUC: 0.80 vs. 0.77) the classical clinical risk model, with good calibration, too [172]. Lipidomic was also approached to draft a risk score within a ML workflow using ridge regression on the AusDiab study (n = 10,339) and validated within the Busselton Health Study (n = 4,492), with a noteworthy improvement in CVD risk prediction, highlighting the utility of blood biomarkers to improve the IHD risk stratification beyond traditional tools [173].
Another emerging area in which AI shows considerable promise is the analysis of patient-generated data, thanks to the fast advancements in remote sensing technologies and remote patient monitoring. This new technological approach guarantees the availability of large amounts of data, ideal for the implementation of AI models. Nevertheless, its implementation in the field of IHD is still in its infancy and far from being demonstrated in terms of efficacy and advantages. A randomized control trial tried to understand the role of variables integrated within a smart device on blood pressure control in patients having suffered from a previous MI, with good results in terms of tolerability, yet without a significant improvement in the control of blood pressure [174]. Fitbit-derived data, together with psychometric analysis, were used to predict cardiovascular risk in those with stable ischemic heart disease, with an association retrieved between data acquired and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, as well as between biometric data and cardiac-specific troponin-I [175].
AI has also begun to be applied in the field of cardiac signal processing and diagnostic imaging. The DL model SEER was developed using a large dataset of 12-lead ECG recordings and was capable of predict 5-year cardiovascular mortality with an AUC of 0.83, and atherosclerotic disease with an AUC of 0.67, with a further enhancement of performances when combined with the Pooled Cohort Equations [176]. Furthermore, an AI-based tool developed starting from data from 7 million patients, was able to identify cardiovascular conditions with AUROC between 0.85 and 0.94, depending on the specific analysis to be carried out [177].
When it comes to imaging, several studies have validated AI approaches for calculating significant features from Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) scans, in particular using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models, outperforming classical scores, like the Agatston, in predicting coronary heart disease in different follow-up periods [178]. Radiomics, a relatively novel method for automated feature extraction from imaging is also increasingly applied in cardiovascular imaging in an increased fashion. Notably, an analysis of radiomic features from CAC on CT in 624 patients from the Framingham Heart Study demonstrated improved prediction and enhanced discriminatory ability compared with the benchmark analysis carried out previously [179].
ML is also adopted in combination with CT to achieve high accuracy in detecting stenosis and improving decision-making by reducing unnecessary interventions and predicting long-term outcomes [180]. In fact, AI has demonstrated an excellent capability to improve plaque identification and evaluation on a cohort of 232 patients following a CNN approach, supporting the classical Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) analysis [181]. Nevertheless, it should be noted that current international prevention guidelines do not recommend CCTA as a screening strategy in guiding primary prevention therapy, although further clinical trials employing advanced AI models may support the eventual integration of this modality into clinical guidelines [182].
AI has also proven valuable in the analysis of stress echocardiograms, achieving 92.7% specificity and 84.4% sensitivity in identifying severe coronary artery disease [183], while also enhancing clinical interpretation [184].
Recently, DL models have demonstrated their performances superior to conventional models, in large multicenter registries, like the REFINE–SPECT registry, featuring more than 20,000 participants, tailored at the automated analysis of nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging to predict CAD and cardiovascular outcomes [185].
Finally, a comprehensive state-of-the-art overview published in the European Heart Journal underscored the substantial potential of AI to promote cardiovascular health at the population level. The authors highlighted a wide range of applications—from early detection of cardiovascular events and continuous monitoring of disease progression to the optimization of preventive, personalized interventions. The review also emphasized the value of integrating large-scale registry and biobank data within AI frameworks, noting that such approaches could be extended to incorporate additional data domains, including environmental exposures such as phthalates [186].

5.3. Phthalates and Cardiometabolic Pathways: AI Role in Their Integration

Beyond being used in the typical demands of risk prediction, AI approaches are being applied continuously to the aim of multimodal modeling in the cardiometabolic field. In this domain, a recent review, published in Cell Metabolism, highlighted how transformer-based and multimodal DL systems can integrate different, broad datasets, which include genetic information, metabolic and inflammatory biomarkers, sleep indicators, and behavioral determinants, to jointly model mechanisms, which are at the basis of cardiometabolic disease. All in all, the models described are capable of being adapted to include data from environmental pollutants, including phthalates, in turn known to have the ability to disrupt lipid metabolism, glucose regulation, as well as vascular homeostasis [187]. Therefore, AI in general and ML in particular can leverage the associations between phthalate exposure and atherosclerosis and its features to develop mechanistic and predictive models integrating exposure biomarkers with early vascular changes.

5.4. Tips for Future Development

The integration of phthalate exposure data with cardiovascular and clinical features through AI represents a promising avenue for improving individualized risk prediction, identifying vulnerable or biologically fragile subgroups, and enhancing preventive cardiology through algorithms that explicitly incorporate environmental determinants. Such approaches may also inform public-health interventions targeting environmental cardiotoxins.
Future priorities in this field are likely to include the development of multimodal AI models and architecture capable of embedding chemical-exposure biomarkers and related information, cardiometabolic indicators, clinical variables, multi-omics data, behavioral patterns, and environmental features, to ultimately advance the understanding of environmental contributions to cardiovascular conditions, and IHD in particular, fostering precision medicine and preventative strategies.

6. Conclusions

Phthalate pollution is recognized as a global concern for both ecosystems and human health due to the extensive use of these compounds and their widespread distribution across all environmental matrices, despite progressive regulatory restrictions in major world regions. Although phthalates are primarily known as endocrine disruptors, they have more recently emerged as potential contributors to the pathogenesis of CVD and particularly IHD, the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Despite the limited number of published studies, all of which employ cross-sectional designs and therefore cannot establish causality, exposure to selected phthalates appears to be significantly associated with key markers of atherosclerosis, the pathological hallmark of IHD. These include the number of atherosclerotic plaques, carotid IMT, and the echogenicity of both the intima–media complex and plaque structures, with associations persisting independently of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Phthalates may also promote atherosclerosis by inducing apoptosis of endothelial and platelet cells, activating monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils, thereby amplifying inflammatory responses, and increasing circulating thrombosis markers. Taken together, these findings suggest a potential role of phthalates in promoting atherosclerosis and, consequently, in the development of IHD, reinforcing the need to reduce phthalate use for cardiovascular prevention and to adequately monitor human exposure. Longitudinal, large-scale, multicenter studies are urgently needed to clarify the long-term cardiovascular effects of phthalate exposure. Moreover, the significant positive association between urinary phthalate levels and hs-cTn, a sensitive biomarker of myocardial injury, with effect sizes varying by age, sex, phthalate molecular weight, and with BMI and glycemic status acting as mediators, highlights the diverse cardiotoxic pathways through which phthalates may act and underscores the need for further investigation.
An increasing number of studies across cellular, animal, and human research show that exposure to phthalates and their metabolites causes significant changes at the cellular and molecular levels. These include oxidative stress and inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, epigenetic modifications, and lipid accumulation. In this context, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) represent a promising and innovative platform for studying how environmental toxins like phthalates impact the development of IHD. Using human blood-derived iPSC lines, researchers can generate both 2D and 3D heart tissue models that closely replicate native structure and function, facilitating detailed studies of gene-environment interactions and individual genetic susceptibility to phthalates. Such research has the potential to identify harmful effects and uncover disease mechanisms early on - possibly before these effects are detectable in large population studies - thereby advancing our understanding and prevention of IHD related to environmental exposures [188].
Finally, future studies might take advantage of the technological developments in terms of novel instruments, consumer tools and, ultimately, AI models and approaches, enabling the discovery of mechanistic interplays between environmental determinants, their biological and clinical effects, and ultimately fostering the optimization of the clinical outcome.

Author Contributions

For research articles with several authors, a short paragraph specifying their individual contributions must be provided. Conceptualization, F.G. and A.B.; methodology, F.G., A.T. and A.B.; writing—original draft preparation, F.G., A.T., M.P., and A.B.; writing—review and editing, F.G., A.T., M.P., and A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data was created.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
5mdC 5-methyl-2-deoxycytidine
AI Artificial Intelligence
AMI Acute myocardial infarction
ASCVD Atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases
AUC Area Under the Curve
AUROC Area Under the Receiving Operating Characteristics curve
BBP Butyl benzyl phthalate
BBzP Butylbenzyl phthalate
BMI Body mass index
bw Body weight
CAC Coronary Artery Calcium
CCTA Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography
cGAN Conventional Generative Adversarial Network
CHD Coronary heart disease
CNN Convolutional Neural Network
CT Computed Tomography
CVD Cardiovascular disease
dG 2-deoxyguanine
DBP Di-n-butyl phthalate
DEHP 2-ethylhexyl phthalate
DEP Diethyl phthalate
DIBP Diisobutyl phthalate
DIDP Di-iso-decyl phthalate
DINP Diisononyl phthalate
DIPP Diisobutyl phthalate
DL Deep Learning
DMP Dimethyl phthalate
DnBP Di-n-butyl phthalate
DnOP di-n-octyl phthalate
DOP Dinoctyl phthalate
eGFR Estimated glomerular filtration rate
EBP Elevated blood pressure
EHR Electronic Health Record
EMP Endothelial microparticle
FPG Fasting plasma glucose
GBM Gradient Boosting Machine
GSH Glutathione
GSM Gray-scale median
HMW High-molecular weight
hs-CRP High-sensitivity C-reactive protein
hscTn High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I
IHD Ischemic heart disease
IMT Intima-media thickness
IL Interleukin
lncRNA Long non-coding RNA
LLE-GC-MS Liquid–liquid extraction/gas chromatography/mass spectrometry
LMW Low-molecular weight
MBP Mono-butyl phthalate
MBzP Monobenzyl phthalate
MCPP Mono-3-carboxy propyl phthalate
MDA Malondialdehyde
MECPP mono-2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl phthalate
MEHHP Mono(ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate
MEHOP Mono(2-ethly-5-oxoheyl) phthalate
MEHP Mono (2 ethylhexyl) phthalate
MEP Mono-ethyl phthalate
MiBP Mono-isobutyl phthalate
miRNA Micro RNA
ML Machine Learning
MMP Mono-methyl phthalate
MnBP Mono-n-butyl phthalate
mtDNA Mitochondrial DNA
PLBoost Phthalate Boosting
PMP Platelet microparticle
ROS Reactive oxygen species
SDI Sociodemographic index
SMC Smooth muscle cell
SOD Superoxide dismutase
T2D Type 2 diabetes
TDI Tolerable daily intake
VSMC Vascular smooth muscle cell

References

  1. Hahad, O.; A Gilan, D.; Chalabi, J.; Al-Kindi, S.; Schuster, A.K.; Wicke, F.; Büttner, M.; Tüscher, O.; Lackner, K.J.; Galle, P.R.; et al. Cumulative social disadvantage and cardiovascular disease burden and mortality. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2023, 31, 40–48. [CrossRef]
  2. Nedkoff, L.; Briffa, T.; Zemedikun, D.; Herrington, S.; Wright, F.L. Global Trends in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. Clin. Ther. 2023, 45, 1087–1091. [CrossRef]
  3. WHO, World Health Organization, 2025. Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs). Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds) (accessed on 27 November 2023).
  4. GBD 2021 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global incidence, prevalence, years lived with disability (YLDs), disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 371 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2024, 403, 2133-2161.
  5. Li, Y.; Cao, G.-Y.; Jing, W.-Z.; Liu, J.; Liu, M. Global trends and regional differences in incidence and mortality of cardiovascular disease, 1990−2019: findings from 2019 global burden of disease study. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2022, 30, 276–286. [CrossRef]
  6. GBD 2021 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global burden of 288 causes of death and life expectancy decomposition in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2024, 403, 1988.
  7. Tang, J.; Hu, S.; Liu, X.; Li, H.; Kuang, L.; Zhang, L.; Cao, W.; Zhang, T.; Guan, X.; Li, L.; et al. Global, regional, and national time trends in ischaemic heart disease incidence over three decades (1990–2019): an age-period-cohort analysis of the global burden of disease study 2019. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2024, 11, 1396380. [CrossRef]
  8. Buja, L.M.; Heide, R.S.V. Pathobiology of Ischemic Heart Disease: Past, Present and Future. Cardiovasc. Pathol. 2016, 25, 214–220. [CrossRef]
  9. Jovin, D.G.; Sumpio, B.E.; Greif, D.M. Manifestations of human atherosclerosis across vascular beds. Jvs-Vascular Insights 2024, 2. [CrossRef]
  10. Russo, M.; Gurgoglione, F.L.; Russo, A.; Rinaldi, R.; Triglia, L.T.; Foschi, M.; Vigna, C.; Vergallo, R.; Montone, R.A.; Benedetto, U.; et al. Coronary Artery Disease and Atherosclerosis in Other Vascular Districts: Epidemiology, Risk Factors and Atherosclerotic Plaque Features. Life 2025, 15, 1226. [CrossRef]
  11. Khera, A.V.; Emdin, C.A.; Drake, I.; Natarajan, P.; Bick, A.G.; Cook, N.R.; Chasman, D.I.; Baber, U.; Mehran, R.; Rader, D.J.; et al. Genetic Risk, Adherence to a Healthy Lifestyle, and Coronary Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 2349–2358. [CrossRef]
  12. pinar, J. Hypertension and ischemic heart disease. Cor et vasa. 2012, 54, e433-e438.
  13. Pirillo, A.; Norata, G.D. The burden of hypercholesterolemia and ischemic heart disease in an ageing world. Pharmacol. Res. 2023, 193, 106814. [CrossRef]
  14. Shen, N.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Li, D.; Wang, Q.; Chai, L.; Chen, Y.; Hu, H.; Li, M. The global burden of ischemic heart disease attributed to high fasting plasma glucose: Data from 1990 to 2019. Heliyon 2024, 10, e27065. [CrossRef]
  15. Sohail, M.U.; Aisha, E.; Waqas, S.A.; Saad, M.; Arshad, M.S.; Ahmed, A.; Sohail, M.O.; Naveed, Z.; Amin, E.; Arora, S.; et al. Trends in obesity-related ischemic heart disease mortality among adults in the United States from 1999 to 2020. Futur. Cardiol. 2025, 21, 479–487. [CrossRef]
  16. Tang, S.; Meng, J.; Zhao, X.; Sun, W. Trends of ischemic heart disease mortality attributable to smoking in the five countries with the highest number of smokers during 1990–2019: an age-period-cohort analysis. Arch. Med Sci. 2024, 20, 43–53. [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, Y.; Yan, D.; Xu, W.; Min, B.; Fan, Z.; Su, H.; Zhao, X.; Wang, D.; Zhu, Y. Global burden of ischemic heart disease attributable to dietary factors: insights from the global burden of disease study 2021. Front. Nutr. 2025, 12, 1634566. [CrossRef]
  18. Scimeca, M.; Palumbo, V.; Giacobbi, E.; Servadei, F.; Casciardi, S.; Cornella, E.; Cerbara, F.; Rotondaro, G.; Seghetti, C.; Scioli, M.P.; et al. Impact of the environmental pollution on cardiovascular diseases: From epidemiological to molecular evidence. Heliyon 2024, 10, e38047. [CrossRef]
  19. Lamas, G.A.; Bhatnagar, A.; Jones, M.R.; Mann, K.K.; Nasir, K.; Tellez-Plaza, M.; Ujueta, F.; Navas-Acien, A.; the American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; and Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disea Contaminant Metals as Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. J. Am. Hear. Assoc. 2023, 12, e029852. [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, L.; Zheng, B.; Gong, Y. Global, regional and national burden of ischemic heart disease and its attributable risk factors from 1990 to 2021: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease study 2021. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2025, 25, 1–15. [CrossRef]
  21. WHO, World Health Organization. The public health impact of chemicals: knowns and unknowns. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-FWC-PHE-EPE-16.01-eng (accessed 17 November 2025).
  22. Bu, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, F.; Tan, Y. Analysis of global commonly-used phthalates and non-dietary exposure assessment in indoor environment. Build. Environ. 2020, 177. [CrossRef]
  23. Gorini, F.; Tonacci, A.; Sanmartin, C.; Venturi, F. Phthalates and Non-Phthalate Plasticizers and Thyroid Dysfunction: Current Evidence and Novel Strategies to Reduce Their Spread in Food Industry and Environment. Toxics 2025, 13, 222. [CrossRef]
  24. Gao, D.; Li, Z.; Wang, H.; Liang, H. An overview of phthalate acid ester pollution in China over the last decade: Environmental occurrence and human exposure. Sci. Total. Environ. 2018, 645, 1400–1409. [CrossRef]
  25. Statista. Global Plasticizers Market Volume 2015-2030. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1245193/plasticizer-market-volume-worldwide/#:~:text=In%202022,%20market%20volume%20of,it%20softer%20and%20more%20flexible (accessed on 20 November 2025).
  26. Naveen, K.V.; Saravanakumar, K.; Zhang, X.; Sathiyaseelan, A.; Wang, M.-H. Impact of environmental phthalate on human health and their bioremediation strategies using fungal cell factory- A review. Environ. Res. 2022, 214, 113781. [CrossRef]
  27. TEDX, The Endocrine Disruption Exchange. List of Potential Endocrine Disruptors. Available online: https://endocrinedisruption.org/interactive-tools/tedx-list-of-potential-endocrine-disruptors/search-the-tedx-list (accessed on 20 November 2025).
  28. Kelly, M.; Connolly, L.; Dean, M. Public Awareness and Risk Perceptions of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals: A Qualitative Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Heal. 2020, 17, 7778. [CrossRef]
  29. Eales, J.; Bethel, A.; Galloway, T.; Hopkinson, P.; Morrissey, K.; Short, R.; Garside, R. Human health impacts of exposure to phthalate plasticizers: An overview of reviews. Environ. Int. 2022, 158, 106903. [CrossRef]
  30. Mariana, M.; Castelo-Branco, M.; Soares, A.M.; Cairrao, E. Phthalates’ exposure leads to an increasing concern on cardiovascular health. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 457, 131680. [CrossRef]
  31. Hyman, S.; Acevedo, J.; Giannarelli, C.; Trasande, L. Phthalate exposure from plastics and cardiovascular disease: global estimates of attributable mortality and years life lost. EBioMedicine 2025, 117, 105730. [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, J.; Wang, Z.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, J.; Wang, Z.; Xu, F.; Chen, Y.; Li, C. Association between phthalates exposure and myocardial damage in the general population: A cross-sectional study. Environ. Res. 2024, 261, 119632. [CrossRef]
  33. Gong, W.; Zhu, H.; Sun, X.; Zhang, J.; Lin, M.; Sun, P. The association between exposure to phthalates and cardiovascular disease: A comprehensive study utilizing NHANES data from 2005 to 2018 and network toxicology. Chem. Interactions 2025, 420, 111651. [CrossRef]
  34. Kabekkodu, S.P.; Gladwell, L.R.; Choudhury, M. The mitochondrial link: Phthalate exposure and cardiovascular disease. Biochim. et Biophys. Acta (BBA) - Mol. Cell Res. 2024, 1871, 119708. [CrossRef]
  35. Moawad, A.M.; Awady, S.; Ali, A.A.E.R.; Abdelgwad, M.; Belal, S.; Taha, S.H.N.; Mohamed, M.I.; Hassan, F.M. Phthalate Exposure and Coronary Heart Disease: Possible Implications of Oxidative Stress and Altered miRNA Expression. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2024, 37, 723–730. [CrossRef]
  36. Hasan, M.; Tama, R.T.; Dona, H.A.; Hoque, N.S.; Rahaman, A.; Alam, A. Comprehensive review of phthalate exposure: Health implications, biomarker detection and regulatory standards. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2024, 247, 106671. [CrossRef]
  37. Martínez-Ibarra, A.; Martínez-Razo, L.; MacDonald-Ramos, K.; Morales-Pacheco, M.; Vázquez-Martínez, E.; López-López, M.; Dorantes, M.R.; Cerbón, M. Multisystemic alterations in humans induced by bisphenol A and phthalates: Experimental, epidemiological and clinical studies reveal the need to change health policies. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 271, 116380. [CrossRef]
  38. Mansuri, A.; Trivedi, C.; Chokshi, S.; Jantrania, K.; Kumar, A. Phthalate Exposure: Prevalence, Health Effects, Regulatory Frameworks, and Remediation. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2025, 38, 1291–1308. [CrossRef]
  39. Šimunović, A.; Tomić, S.; Kranjčec, K. Medical devices as a source of phthalate exposure: a review of current knowledge and alternative solutions. Arch. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. 2022, 73, 179–190. [CrossRef]
  40. Giuliani, A.; Zuccarini, M.; Cichelli, A.; Khan, H.; Reale, M. Critical Review on the Presence of Phthalates in Food and Evidence of Their Biological Impact. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Heal. 2020, 17, 5655. [CrossRef]
  41. Das, M.T.; Ghosh, P.; Thakur, I.S. Intake estimates of phthalate esters for South Delhi population based on exposure media assessment. Environ. Pollut. 2014, 189, 118–125. [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, Y.; Zhu, H.; Kannan, K. A Review of Biomonitoring of Phthalate Exposures. Toxics 2019, 7, 21. [CrossRef]
  43. Fromme, H.; Gruber, L.; Schlummer, M.; Wolz, G.; Böhmer, S.; Angerer, J.; Mayer, R.; Liebl, B.; Bolte, G. Intake of phthalates and di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate: Results of the Integrated Exposure Assessment Survey based on duplicate diet samples and biomonitoring data. Environ. Int. 2007, 33, 1012–1020. [CrossRef]
  44. Fromme, H.; Lahrz, T.; Piloty, M.; Gebhart, H.; Oddoy, A.; Ruden, H. Occurrence of phthalates and musk fragrances in indoor air and dust from apartments and kindergartens in Berlin (Germany). Indoor Air 2004, 14, 188–195. [CrossRef]
  45. Wormuth, M.; Scheringer, M.; Vollenweider, M.; Hungerbühler, K. What Are the Sources of Exposure to Eight Frequently Used Phthalic Acid Esters in Europeans? Risk Anal. 2006, 26, 803–824. [CrossRef]
  46. Stroustrup, A.; Bragg, J.B.; Busgang, S.A.; Andra, S.S.; Curtin, P.; Spear, E.A.; Just, A.C.; Arora, M.; Gennings, C. Sources of clinically significant neonatal intensive care unit phthalate exposure. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiology 2018, 30, 137–148. [CrossRef]
  47. Tran, H.T.; Lin, C.; Bui, X.-T.; Nguyen, M.K.; Cao, N.D.T.; Mukhtar, H.; Hoang, H.G.; Varjani, S.; Ngo, H.H.; Nghiem, L.D. Phthalates in the environment: characteristics, fate and transport, and advanced wastewater treatment technologies. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 344, 126249. [CrossRef]
  48. EC: Commission Decision of 7 December 1999 adopting measures prohibiting the placing on the market of toys and childcare articles intended to be placed in the mouth by children under three years of age made of soft PVC containing one or more of the substances di-iso-nonyl phthalate (DINP), di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP), di-iso-decyl phthalate (DIDP), di-n-octyl phthalate (DNOP), and butylbenzyl phthalate (BBP) (notified under document number C(1999) 4436). Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/da264be1-6ef2-4063-b725-f36cc1f1a20f (accessed on 13 December 2025).
  49. Palandri, L.; Monti, M.; Scasserra, M.R.; Lugli, C.; Fasano, M.; Lucaccioni, L.; Righi, E. Regulatory framework of phthalates and two common alternatives: A review of the European Union legislation. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Heal. 2025, 271, 114704. [CrossRef]
  50. European Commission. REACH Regulation. Available online: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/chemicals/reach-regulation_en (accessed on 13 December 2025).
  51. European Union. Directive 2005/84/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2005 amending for the 22nd time Council Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (phthalates in toys and childcare articles). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2005/84/oj/eng (accessed on 13 December 2025).
  52. European Union. Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/2005 of 17 December 2018 Amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as Regards Bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate (DEHP), Dibutyl Phthalate (DBP), Benzyl Butyl Phthalate (BBP) and Diisobutyl Phthalate (DIBP). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2018/2005/oj/eng (accessed on 13 December 2025).
  53. EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP); Silano, V.; Barat Baviera, J.M.; Bolognesi, C.; Chesson, A.; Cocconcelli, P.S.; Crebelli, R.; Gott, D.M.; Grob, K.; Lampi, E.; et al. Update of the risk assessment of di-butylphthalate (DBP), butyl-benzyl-phthalate (BBP), bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), di-isononylphthalate (DINP) and di-isodecylphthalate (DIDP) for use in food contact materials. EFSA J. 2019, 17, e05838.
  54. European Commission. Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/2045 of 23 November 2021 amending Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Text with EEA relevance). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/2045/oj/eng (accessed on 14 December 2025).
  55. European Commission. Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/2482 of 13 November 2023 amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the substance bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) in medical devices. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/2482/oj/eng (accessed on 14 December 2025).
  56. United States Environmental Protection Agency: Assessing and Managing Chemicals under TSCA. URL: https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/phthalates (accessed on).
  57. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2025. Risk Evaluation for Di-isodecyl phthalate (1,2-Benzene- dicarboxylic acid, 1,2- diisodecyl ester) (DIDP). Available online: https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-evaluation-di-isodecyl-phthalate-12-benzene (accessed on 15 December 2025).
  58. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2025. Risk Evaluation for Diisononyl phthalate (1,2-Benzene- dicarboxylic acid, 1,2- diisononyl ester) (DINP). Available online: https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-evaluation-diisononyl-phthalate-12-benzene (accessed on 15 December 2025).
  59. GreenSoft Technology, Inc., 2024. China RoHS Regulation Updated to Restrict Four Phthalates in Electronics. Available online: https://www.greensofttech.com/blog-2024-china-rohs-regulation-updated-to-restrict-four-phthalates-in-electronics/ (accessed on 15 December 2025).
  60. Hlisníková, H.; Petrovičová, I.; Kolena, B.; Šidlovská, M.; Sirotkin, A. Effects and Mechanisms of Phthalates’ Action on Reproductive Processes and Reproductive Health: A Literature Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Heal. 2020, 17, 6811. [CrossRef]
  61. Caporossi, L.; Alteri, A.; Campo, G.; Paci, E.; Tranfo, G.; Capanna, S.; Papaleo, E.; Pigini, D.; Viganò, P.; Papaleo, B. Cross Sectional Study on Exposure to BPA and Phthalates and Semen Parameters in Men Attending a Fertility Center. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Heal. 2020, 17, 489. [CrossRef]
  62. Hond, E.D.; Tournaye, H.; De Sutter, P.; Ombelet, W.; Baeyens, W.; Covaci, A.; Cox, B.; Nawrot, T.S.; Van Larebeke, N.; D'HOoghe, T. Human exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals and fertility: A case–control study in male subfertility patients. Environ. Int. 2015, 84, 154–160. [CrossRef]
  63. Jensen, M.S.; Anand-Ivell, R.; Nørgaard-Pedersen, B.; Jönsson, B.A.G.; Bonde, J.P.; Hougaard, D.M.; Cohen, A.; Lindh, C.H.; Ivell, R.; Toft, G. Amniotic Fluid Phthalate Levels and Male Fetal Gonad Function. Epidemiology 2015, 26, 91–99. [CrossRef]
  64. Das, D.; Dutta, H.K.; Borbora, D.; Brahma, R.C.; Das, J.M. Assessing the relationship between hypospadias risk and parental occupational exposure to potential endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Occup. Environ. Med. 2022, 80, 93–96. [CrossRef]
  65. Dorman, D.C.; Chiu, W.; Hales, B.F.; Hauser, R.; Johnson, K.J.; Mantus, E.; Martel, S.; Robinson, K.A.; Rooney, A.A.; Rudel, R.; et al. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of human and animal evidence of prenatal diethylhexyl phthalate exposure and changes in male anogenital distance. J. Toxicol. Environ. Heal. Part B 2018, 21, 207–226. [CrossRef]
  66. Ghazarian, A.A.; Trabert, B.; Robien, K.; Graubard, B.I.; McGlynn, K.A. Maternal use of personal care products during pregnancy and risk of testicular germ cell tumors in sons. Environ. Res. 2018, 164, 109–113. [CrossRef]
  67. Li, J.; Deng, T.; Rao, W.; Liao, H.; Wang, Y.; Guo, N.; Du, Y.; Guo, Q.; Zeng, Q.; Liu, C.; et al. Phthalate metabolites in urine and follicular fluid in relation to menstrual cycle characteristics in women seeking fertility assistance. Environ. Int. 2023, 183, 108362. [CrossRef]
  68. Golestanzadeh, M.; Riahi, R.; Kelishadi, R. Association of phthalate exposure with precocious and delayed pubertal timing in girls and boys: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2020, 22, 873–894. [CrossRef]
  69. Hu, W.; Jin, Z.; Wang, H.; Wang, F.; Qu, F. Relationship between phthalates exposure, risk of decreased ovarian reserve, and oxidative stress levels. Toxicol. Ind. Heal. 2024, 40, 156–166. [CrossRef]
  70. Al-Saleh, I. The relationship between urinary phthalate metabolites and polycystic ovary syndrome in women undergoing in vitro fertilization: Nested case-control study. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131495. [CrossRef]
  71. Cai, W.; Yang, J.; Liu, Y.; Bi, Y.; Wang, H. Association between Phthalate Metabolites and Risk of Endometriosis: A Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3678. [CrossRef]
  72. Tiburcio, D.; Parsell, M.; Shapiro, H.; Adolphe, S.; Naranjo, O.; George, S.; Toborek, M. Endocrine disruption to metastasis: How phthalates promote breast carcinogenesis. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025, 303, 118874–118874. [CrossRef]
  73. Derakhshan, A.; Shu, H.; Broeren, M.A.; Lindh, C.H.; Peeters, R.P.; Kortenkamp, A.; Demeneix, B.; Bornehag, C.-G.; Korevaar, T.I. Association of phthalate exposure with thyroid function during pregnancy. Environ. Int. 2021, 157, 106795. [CrossRef]
  74. Al-Saleh, I.; Elkhatib, R.; Alghamdi, R.; Alrushud, N.; Alnuwaysir, H.; Alnemer, M.; Aldhalaan, H.; Shoukri, M. Phthalate exposure during pregnancy and its association with thyroid hormones: A prospective cohort study. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Heal. 2024, 261, 114421. [CrossRef]
  75. Li, N.; Papandonatos, G.D.; Calafat, A.M.; Yolton, K.; Lanphear, B.P.; Chen, A.; Braun, J.M. Identifying periods of susceptibility to the impact of phthalates on children's cognitive abilities. Environ. Res. 2019, 172, 604–614. [CrossRef]
  76. Polanska, K.; Ligocka, D.; Sobala, W.; Hanke, W. Phthalate exposure and child development: The Polish Mother and Child Cohort Study. Early Hum. Dev. 2014, 90, 477–485. [CrossRef]
  77. Praveena, S.M.; Munisvaradass, R.; Masiran, R.; Rajendran, R.K.; Lin, C.-C.; Kumar, S. Phthalates exposure and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children: a systematic review of epidemiological literature. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 44757–44770. [CrossRef]
  78. Linghu, D.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, D.; Luo, Y.; Ma, J.; Li, T.; Sun, Z.; Xie, Z.; Sun, J.; Cao, C. Diethylhexyl phthalate induces immune dysregulation and is an environmental immune disruptor. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 480, 136244. [CrossRef]
  79. Boissiere-O’nEill, T.; Lazarevic, N.; Sly, P.D.; Ponsonby, A.-L.; Chen, A.; Azad, M.B.; Braun, J.M.; Brook, J.R.; Burgner, D.; Lanphear, B.P.; et al. Phthalates and bisphenols early-life exposure, and childhood allergic conditions: a pooled analysis of cohort studies. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiology 2025, 35, 965–980. [CrossRef]
  80. Li, R.; Zheng, B.; Zhang, Y.; He, L.; Ren, C.; Guan, L.; Yang, H.; Tian, J.; Chen, X.; Shi, D.; et al. The impact of phthalates on asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a comprehensive analysis based on network toxicology and molecular docking. Front. Pharmacol. 2025, 16, 1566965. [CrossRef]
  81. Ahern, T.P.; Broe, A.; Lash, T.L.; Cronin-Fenton, D.P.; Ulrichsen, S.P.; Christiansen, P.M.; Cole, B.F.; Tamimi, R.M.; Sørensen, H.T.; Damkier, P. Phthalate Exposure and Breast Cancer Incidence: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37, 1800–1809. [CrossRef]
  82. Attina, T.M.; Trasande, L. Association of Exposure to Di-2-Ethylhexylphthalate Replacements With Increased Insulin Resistance in Adolescents From NHANES 2009–2012. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 100, 2640–2650. [CrossRef]
  83. Dales, R.E.; Kauri, L.M.; Cakmak, S. The associations between phthalate exposure and insulin resistance, β-cell function and blood glucose control in a population-based sample. Sci. Total. Environ. 2018, 612, 1287–1292. [CrossRef]
  84. Tan, Y.; Guo, Z.; Yao, H.; Liu, H.; Fu, Y.; Luo, Y.; He, R.; Liu, Y.; Li, P.; Nie, L.; et al. Association of phthalate exposure with type 2 diabetes and the mediating effect of oxidative stress: A case-control and computational toxicology study. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2024, 274, 116216. [CrossRef]
  85. Wu, Q.; Li, G.; Zhao, C.-Y.; Na, X.-L.; Zhang, Y.-B. Association between phthalate exposure and obesity risk: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2023, 102, 104240. [CrossRef]
  86. Mérida, D.M.; Moreno-Franco, B.; Marquès, M.; León-Latre, M.; Laclaustra, M.; Guallar-Castillón, P. Phthalate exposure and the metabolic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 333, 121957. [CrossRef]
  87. Kosmas, C.E.; Bousvarou, M.D.; Kostara, C.E.; Papakonstantinou, E.J.; Salamou, E.; Guzman, E. Insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease. J Int Med Res. 2023, 51, 3000605231164548.
  88. Kobiyama, K.; Ley, K. Atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2018, 123, 1118-1120.
  89. Lind, P.M.; Lind, L. Circulating levels of bisphenol A and phthalates are related to carotid atherosclerosis in the elderly. Atherosclerosis 2011, 218, 207–213. [CrossRef]
  90. Olkowska, E. Permeability of Dimethyl Phthalate Through Human Skin Models – Health Risk Assessment. Expo. Heal. 2023, 16, 369–376. [CrossRef]
  91. Lagarde, F.; Beausoleil, C.; Belcher, S.M.; Belzunces, L.P.; Emond, C.; Guerbet, M.; Rousselle, C. Non-monotonic dose-response relationships and endocrine disruptors: a qualitative method of assessment. Environ. Heal. 2015, 14, 13–13. [CrossRef]
  92. EFSA Scientific Committee; More, S.; Benford, D.; Bennekou, S.H.; Bampidis, V.; Bragard, C.; Halldorsson, T.; Hernandez-Jerez, A.; Koutsoumanis, K.; Lambré, C.; et al. Opinion on the impact of non-monotonic dose responses on EFSA′s human health risk assessments. EFSA J. 2021, 19, e06877. [CrossRef]
  93. Lind, L.; Andersson, J.; Rönn, M.; Gustavsson, T. The echogenecity of the intima–media complex in the common carotid artery is closely related to the echogenecity in plaques. Atherosclerosis 2007, 195, 411–414. [CrossRef]
  94. Andersson, J.; Sundström, J.; Gustavsson, T.; Hulthe, J.; Elmgren, A.; Zilmer, K.; Zilmer, M.; Lind, L. Echogenecity of the carotid intima-media complex is related to cardiovascular risk factors, dyslipidemia, oxidative stress and inflammation: the Prospective Investigation of the Vasculature in Uppsala Seniors (PIVUS) study. Atherosclerosis. 2009, 204, 612-618.
  95. Olsén, L.; Lind, L.; Lind, P.M. Associations between circulating levels of bisphenol A and phthalate metabolites and coronary risk in the elderly. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2012, 80, 179–183. [CrossRef]
  96. Al-Shamsi, S. Performance of the Framingham coronary heart disease risk score for predicting 10-year cardiac risk in adult United Arab Emirates nationals without diabetes: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Fam. Pr. 2020, 21, 1–7. [CrossRef]
  97. Wiberg, B.; Lind, P.M.; Lind, L. Serum levels of monobenzylphthalate (MBzP) is related to carotid atherosclerosis in the elderly. Environ. Res. 2014, 133, 348–352. [CrossRef]
  98. Herrero, Ó.; Planelló, R.; Morcillo, G. The plasticizer benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP) alters the ecdysone hormone pathway, the cellular response to stress, the energy metabolism, and several detoxication mechanisms in Chironomus riparius larvae. Chemosphere 2015, 128, 266–277. [CrossRef]
  99. Lin, C.-Y.; Hsieh, C.-J.; Lo, S.-C.; Chen, P.-C.; Torng, P.-L.; Hu, A.; Sung, F.-C.; Su, T.-C. Positive association between concentration of phthalate metabolites in urine and microparticles in adolescents and young adults. Environ. Int. 2016, 92-93, 157–164. [CrossRef]
  100. Feng, S.; Chen, J.W.; Shu, X.Y.; Aihemaiti, M.; Quan, J.W.; Lu, L.; Zhang, R.Y.; Yang, C.D.; Wang, X.Q. Endothelial microparticles: A mechanosensitive regulator of vascular homeostasis and injury under shear stress. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 980112. [CrossRef]
  101. Strukel, S.; Teshome, B.; Rai, V. The Multifaceted Role of Platelets in Atherosclerosis and Ischemic Disease: Pathogenesis, Inflammation, and Therapeutic Opportunities. Life 2025, 15, 1656. [CrossRef]
  102. Olson, N.C.; Koh, I.; Reiner, A.P.; Judd, S.E.; Irvin, M.R.; Howard, G.; Zakai, N.A.; Cushman, M. Soluble CD14, Ischemic Stroke, and Coronary Heart Disease Risk in a Prospective Study: The REGARDS Cohort. J. Am. Hear. Assoc. 2020, 9, e014241. [CrossRef]
  103. Ban, J.-B.; Fan, X.-W.; Huang, Q.; Li, B.-F.; Chen, C.; Zhang, H.-C.; Xu, S.-Q. Mono-(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate Induces Injury in Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells. PLOS ONE 2014, 9, e97607. [CrossRef]
  104. Choy, J.C.; Granville, D.J.; Hunt, D.W.; McManus, B.M. Endothelial Cell Apoptosis: Biochemical Characteristics and Potential Implications for Atherosclerosis. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2001, 33, 1673–1690. [CrossRef]
  105. Su, T.-C.; Hwang, J.-S.; Torng, P.-L.; Wu, C.; Lin, C.-Y.; Sung, F.-C. Phthalate exposure increases subclinical atherosclerosis in young population. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 250, 586–593. [CrossRef]
  106. Lin, C.-Y.; Lee, H.-L.; Hwang, Y.-T.; Wang, C.; Hsieh, C.-J.; Wu, C.; Sung, F.-C.; Su, T.-C. The association between urine di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate metabolites, global DNA methylation, and subclinical atherosclerosis in a young Taiwanese population. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 265, 114912. [CrossRef]
  107. Hsueh, Y.-M.; Chen, W.-J.; Lee, H.-L.; Huang, Y.-L.; Shiue, H.-S.; Hsu, S.-L.; Chen, H.-H.; Lin, Y.-C. Global DNA methylation and the association between metal exposure and chronic kidney disease. Front. Public Heal. 2023, 11, 1104692. [CrossRef]
  108. Willmer, T.; Mabasa, L.; Sharma, J.; Muller, C.J.F.; Johnson, R. Blood-Based DNA Methylation Biomarkers to Identify Risk and Progression of Cardiovascular Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 2355. [CrossRef]
  109. Agha, G.; Mendelson, M.M.; Ward-Caviness, C.K.; Joehanes, R.; Huan, T.; Gondalia, R.; Salfati, E.; Brody, J.A.; Fiorito, G.; Bressler, J.; et al. Blood Leukocyte DNA Methylation Predicts Risk of Future Myocardial Infarction and Coronary Heart Disease. Circulation 2019, 140, 645–657. [CrossRef]
  110. Farmakis, D.; Richter, D.; Chronopoulou, G.; Goumas, G.; Kountouras, D.; Mastorakou, A.; Papingiotis, G.; Hahalis, G.; Tsioufis, K. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I for cardiovascular risk stratification in apparently healthy individuals. Hell. J. Cardiol. 2023, 75, 74–81. [CrossRef]
  111. Taggart, C.; Wereski, R.; Mills, N.L.; Chapman, A.R. Diagnosis, Investigation and Management of Patients with Acute and Chronic Myocardial Injury. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2331. [CrossRef]
  112. Su, T.-C.; Hwang, J.-J.; Sun, C.-W.; Wang, S.-L. Urinary phthalate metabolites, coronary heart disease, and atherothrombotic markers. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 173, 37–44. [CrossRef]
  113. Hernández-Díaz, S.; Su, Y.-C.; Mitchell, A.A.; Kelley, K.E.; Calafat, A.M.; Hauser, R. Medications as a potential source of exposure to phthalates among women of childbearing age. Reprod. Toxicol. 2013, 37, 1–5. [CrossRef]
  114. Swastini, D.A.; Wiryanthini, I.A.D.; Ariastuti, N.L.P.; Muliantara, A. Atherosclerosis Prediction with High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP) and Related Risk Factor in Patient with Dyslipidemia. Open Access Maced. J. Med Sci. 2019, 7, 3887–3890. [CrossRef]
  115. Surma, S.; Banach, M. Fibrinogen and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases—Review of the Literature and Clinical Studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 23, 193. [CrossRef]
  116. Gong, P.; Yang, S.-H.; Li, S.; Luo, S.-H.; Zeng, R.-X.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, Y.-L.; Zhu, C.-G.; Xu, R.-X.; Li, J.-J. Plasma d-Dimer as a Useful Marker Predicts Severity of Atherosclerotic Lesion and Short-Term Outcome in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost. 2016, 22, 633–640. [CrossRef]
  117. Nosalski, R.; Siedlinski, M.; Neves, K.B.; Monaco, C. Editorial: The interplay between oxidative stress, immune cells and inflammation in cardiovascular diseases. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2024, 11, 1385809. [CrossRef]
  118. Wu, X.; Jiang, L.; Sun, X.; Yao, X.; Bai, Y.; Liu, X.; Liu, N.; Zhai, X.; Wang, S.; Yang, G. Mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate induces autophagy-dependent apoptosis through lysosomal-mitochondrial axis in human endothelial cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 106, 273–282. [CrossRef]
  119. Liu, N.; Jiang, L.; Sun, X.; Yao, X.; Zhai, X.; Liu, X.; Wu, X.; Bai, Y.; Wang, S.; Yang, G. Mono-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate induced ROS-dependent autophagic cell death in human vascular endothelial cells. Toxicol. Vitr. 2017, 44, 49–56. [CrossRef]
  120. Wen, W.; Liu, Z.; Li, L.; Qiu, F.; Zhang, H.; Cao, Y.; Li, J.; Huang, X.; Huang, Y. Multimodal mechanisms of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate-induced cardiovascular–kidney–metabolic syndrome. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2025, 309, 119515.
  121. Fan, X.; Gu, C.; Shen, L.; Gao, Z.; Yang, X.; Bian, Y.; Wang, F.; Jiang, X. Theoretical insights into the binding of mono/di-ethyl phthalates to superoxide dismutase and associated structural changes impairing antioxidant activity: A coupled molecular docking and dynamics simulation approach. Sci. Total. Environ. 2025, 983, 179667. [CrossRef]
  122. Mariana, M.; Cairrao, E. Phthalates Implications in the Cardiovascular System. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2020, 7, 26. [CrossRef]
  123. Amara, I.; Timoumi, R.; Annabi, E.; Neffati, F.; Najjar, M.F.; Bouaziz, C.; Abid-Essefi, S. Di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate induces cardiac disorders in BALB/c mice. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 7540–7549. [CrossRef]
  124. Zhao, J.-F.; Hsiao, S.-H.; Hsu, M.-H.; Pao, K.-C.; Kou, Y.R.; Shyue, S.-K.; Lee, T.-S. Di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate accelerates atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Arch. Toxicol. 2014, 90, 181–190. [CrossRef]
  125. Cui, J.G.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Sun, B.; Li, X.N.; Zhao, Y.; Li, J.L. New insights into DEHP-induced cardiotoxicity: Pyroptosis via sphingolipid metabolism disruption. J Hazard Mater. 2025, 499, 140148.
  126. Chi, Z.; Lin, H.; Wang, X.; Meng, X.; Zhou, J.; Xiang, L.; Cao, G.; Wu, P.; Cai, Z.; Zhao, X. Dimethyl phthalate induces blood immunotoxicity through oxidative damage and caspase-dependent apoptosis. Sci. Total. Environ. 2022, 838, 156047. [CrossRef]
  127. Schwendt, A.; Chammas, J.B.; Chalifour, L.E. Acute phthalate exposure during post-myocardial infarction recovery enhances inflammasome activation. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2022, 440, 115954.
  128. Wang, J.-X.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, M.-S.; Zhang, H.; Cui, J.-G.; Li, J.-L. Heme-oxygenase-1 as a target for phthalate-induced cardiomyocytes ferroptosis. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 317, 120717. [CrossRef]
  129. Liang, X.; Wu, Y.; Feng, Q.; Zhu, D.; Huang, Q.; Wei, Z.; Ma, P.; Yang, X.; Bao, C.; Bao, X. Dibutyl phthalate synergizes with high-fat diet to aggravate cardiac fibrosis. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2025, 302, 118708.
  130. Yamaguchi, R.; Sakamoto, A.; Yamaguchi, R.; Haraguchi, M.; Narahara, S.; Sugiuchi, H.; Katoh, T.; Yamaguchi, Y. Di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate promotes tissue factor–bearing microparticle release from macrophages. Am J Med Sci. 2019, 357, 492–506.
  131. Shi, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Yu, F.; Li, Z.; Wang, L.; Tu, X.; Zhou, S.; Lu, Q. Phthalate exposure, oxidative stress and hypertension risk: Exploring associations and mediation effects in a Chinese general population. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025, 303, 118832. [CrossRef]
  132. Su, T.-C.; Hwang, J.-J.; Sun, C.-W.; Wang, S.-L. Urinary phthalate metabolites, coronary heart disease, and atherothrombotic markers. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 173, 37–44. [CrossRef]
  133. Wallace, D.C. Mitochondrial DNA Variation in Human Radiation and Disease. Cell 2015, 163, 33–38. [CrossRef]
  134. Ashar, F.N.; Zhang, Y.; Longchamps, R.J.; Lane, J.; Moes, A.; Grove, M.L.; Mychaleckyj, J.C.; Taylor, K.D.; Coresh, J.; Rotter, J.I.; et al. Association of Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number With Cardiovascular Disease. JAMA Cardiol. 2017, 2, 1247–1255. [CrossRef]
  135. Cheng, Q.; Liu, Q.Q.; Lu, C.(. A state-of-the-science review of using mitochondrial DNA copy number as a biomarker for environmental exposure. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 346, 123642. [CrossRef]
  136. Dorn, G.W.; Vega, R.B.; Kelly, D.P. Mitochondrial biogenesis and dynamics in the heart. Genes Dev. 2015, 29, 1981–1991.
  137. Chen, X.J.; Butow, R.A. The organization and inheritance of the mitochondrial genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2005, 6, 815–825. [CrossRef]
  138. Wallace, D.C. A Mitochondrial Paradigm of Metabolic and Degenerative Diseases, Aging, and Cancer: A Dawn for Evolutionary Medicine. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2005, 39, 359–407. [CrossRef]
  139. Shokolenko, I.N.; Alexeyev, M.F. Mitochondrial DNA: A disposable genome? Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015, 1852, 1805–1809.
  140. Yang, H.M. Mitochondrial dysfunction in cardiovascular diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2025, 26, 1917.
  141. Wang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Yuan, K.; Yuan, J. mtDNA in cardiovascular disease pathogenesis. Dis Markers. 2021, 2021, 7157109.
  142. Hu, H.; Lin, Y.; Xu, X.; Lin, S.; Chen, X.; Wang, S. Mitochondrial DNA alterations in coronary heart disease. Exp Mol Pathol. 2020, 114, 104412.
  143. Fan, X.; Zhang, D.; Hou, T.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Z. Mitochondrial toxicity of dibutyl phthalate in zebrafish cells. Chemosphere. 2023, 326, 138510.
  144. Fan, X.; Zhang, D.; Hou, T.; Zhang, Q.; Tao, L.; Bian, C.; Wang, Z. mtDNA stress–mediated toxicity of dibutyl phthalate in zebrafish. Environ Sci Technol. 2024, 58, 7731–7742.
  145. Fu, X.; Zhao, Y.; Ke, Y.; Gao, Y.; Wang, M.; Chen, Y.; Huo, W.; Wang, L.; Zhang, W.; Wu, Y.; et al. Mitochondrial DNA copy number and risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Qjm: Int. J. Med. 2024, 118, 5–15. [CrossRef]
  146. Dor, Y.; Cedar, H. Principles of DNA methylation and their implications for biology and medicine. Lancet 2018, 392, 777–786. [CrossRef]
  147. Wei, J.W.; Huang, K.; Yang, C.; Kang, C.S. Non-coding RNAs as regulators in epigenetics. Oncol Rep. 2017, 37, 3–9.
  148. Damiani, I.; Solberg, E.H.; Iyer, M.; Cheng, P.; Weldy, C.S.; Kim, J.B. Environmental pollutants and atherosclerosis: Epigenetic mechanisms linking genetic risk and disease. Atherosclerosis 2025, 404, 119131. [CrossRef]
  149. Wen, Y.; Kong, Y.; Cao, G.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, J.; Xiao, P.; Wang, Y. Di-n-butyl phthalate regulates vascular smooth muscle cells phenotypic switching by MiR-139–5p-MYOCD pathways. Toxicology 2022, 477, 153279. [CrossRef]
  150. Kong, Y.; Wen, Y.; Cao, G.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Tang, C.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Y. Di-n-butyl phthalate promotes monocyte recruitment via miR-137-3p-SP1-MCP-1 pathway. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 236, 113491. [CrossRef]
  151. Liu, C.; Qin, Q.; Xu, J.; Li, X.; Cong, H. Phthalate promotes atherosclerosis through interacting with long-non coding RNA and induces macrophage foam cell formation and vascular smooth muscle damage. Chemosphere 2022, 308, 136383. [CrossRef]
  152. Wang, K.; Li, M.; Sartor, M.A.; Colacino, J.A.; Dolinoy, D.C.; Svoboda, L.K. Perinatal Exposure to Lead or Diethylhexyl Phthalate in Mice: Sex-Specific Effects on Cardiac DNA Methylation and Gene Expression across Time. Environ. Heal. Perspect. 2025, 133. [CrossRef]
  153. Svoboda, L.K.; Wang, K.; Cavalcante, R.G.; Neier, K.; A Colacino, J.; A Sartor, M.; Dolinoy, D.C. Sex-Specific Programming of Cardiac DNA Methylation by Developmental Phthalate Exposure. Epigenetics Insights 2020, 13. [CrossRef]
  154. Wu, W.; Wang, Z.; Yang, W.; Feng, X.; Yang, Y.; Xu, M.; Li, B.; Wu, P.; Cao, Z. Association between prenatal phthalate exposure and preschoolers’ blood pressure: Mediating role of DNA methylation in hypertension-related genes. Environ. Pollut. 2025, 390, 127450. [CrossRef]
  155. Lin, C.-Y.; Chen, C.-W.; Lee, H.-L.; Wu, C.; Wang, C.; Sung, F.-C.; Su, T.-C. Global DNA methylation mediates the association between urine mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate and serum apoptotic microparticles in a young Taiwanese population. Sci. Total. Environ. 2022, 808, 152054. [CrossRef]
  156. Bai, C.; Yang, H.; Zhao, L.; Liu, L.; Guo, W.; Yu, J.; Li, M.; Liu, M.; Lai, X.; Zhang, X.; et al. The mediating role of plasma microRNAs in the association of phthalates exposure with arterial stiffness: A panel study. Environ. Res. 2022, 212, 113469. [CrossRef]
  157. Palombo, C.; Kozakova, M. Arterial stiffness, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk: Pathophysiologic mechanisms and emerging clinical indications. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2016, 77, 1–7. [CrossRef]
  158. Ference, B.A.; Graham, I.; Tokgozoglu, L.; Catapano, A.L. Impact of lipids on cardiovascular health: JACC health promotion series. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018, 72, 1141–1156.
  159. Yin, L.; Yu, K.S.; Lu, K.; Yu, X. Benzyl butyl phthalate promotes adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes: A High Content Cellomics and metabolomic analysis. Toxicol. Vitr. 2016, 32, 297–309. [CrossRef]
  160. Meruvu, S.; Zhang, J.; Choudhury, M. Butyl Benzyl Phthalate Promotes Adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 Cells via the miRNA-34a-5p Signaling Pathway in the Absence of Exogenous Adipogenic Stimuli. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2021, 34, 2251–2260. [CrossRef]
  161. Schaedlich, K.; Schmidt, J.; Kwong, W.Y.; Sinclair, K.D.; Kurz, R.; Jahnke, H.; Fischer, B. Impact of di-ethylhexylphthalate exposure on metabolic programming in P19 ECC-derived cardiomyocytes. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2014, 35, 861–869. [CrossRef]
  162. Kokai, D.; Filipovic, J.M.; Opacic, M.; Ivelja, I.; Banjac, V.; Stanic, B.; Andric, N. In vitro and in vivo exposure of endothelial cells to dibutyl phthalate promotes monocyte adhesion. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2024, 188, 114663. [CrossRef]
  163. Sui, Y.; Meng, Z.; Chen, J.; Liu, J.; Hernandez, R.; Gonzales, M.B.; Gwag, T.; Morris, A.J.; Zhou, C. Effects of Dicyclohexyl Phthalate Exposure on PXR Activation and Lipid Homeostasis in Mice. Environ. Heal. Perspect. 2021, 129. [CrossRef]
  164. Golestanzadeh, M.; Riahi, R.; Kelishadi, R. Association of exposure to phthalates with cardiometabolic risk factors in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 35670–35686. [CrossRef]
  165. Harley, K.G.; Berger, K.; Rauch, S.; Kogut, K.; Henn, B.C.; Calafat, A.M.; Huen, K.; Eskenazi, B.; Holland, N. Association of prenatal urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations and childhood BMI and obesity. Pediatr. Res. 2017, 82, 405–415. [CrossRef]
  166. Wu, H.-T.; Liao, C.-C.; Peng, C.-F.; Lee, T.-Y.; Liao, P.-H. Exploring the application of machine learning to identify the correlations between phthalate esters and disease: enhancing nursing assessments. Heal. Inf. Sci. Syst. 2024, 13, 1–12. [CrossRef]
  167. Jiang, H.; Lee, T.; Ha, S.; Hwang, J.; Shin, J.; Kim, Y.-P.; Jung, H.-I. Machine Learning-Driven Electrochemical Aptasensing Platform for Highly Accurate Prediction of Phthalate Concentration in Multiple River Sites. BioChip J. 2025, 19, 133–141. [CrossRef]
  168. Parsa, S.; Shah, P.; Doijad, R.; Rodriguez, F. Artificial Intelligence in Ischemic Heart Disease Prevention. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2025, 27, 1–11. [CrossRef]
  169. Ward, A.; Sarraju, A.; Chung, S.; Li, J.; Harrington, R.; Heidenreich, P.; Palaniappan, L.; Scheinker, D.; Rodriguez, F. Machine learning and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk prediction in a multi-ethnic population. npj Digit. Med. 2020, 3, 1–7. [CrossRef]
  170. Sarraju, A.; Ward, A.; Chung, S.; Li, J.; Scheinker, D.; Rodríguez, F. Machine learning approaches improve risk stratification for secondary cardiovascular disease prevention in multiethnic patients. Open Hear. 2021, 8, e001802. [CrossRef]
  171. Alireza, Z.; Maleeha, M.; Kaikkonen, M.; Fortino, V. Enhancing prediction accuracy of coronary artery disease through machine learning-driven genomic variant selection. J. Transl. Med. 2024, 22, 1–14. [CrossRef]
  172. Nurmohamed, N.S.; Pereira, J.P.B.; Hoogeveen, R.M.; Kroon, J.; Kraaijenhof, J.M.; Waissi, F.; Timmerman, N.; Bom, M.J.; Hoefer, I.E.; Knaapen, P.; et al. Targeted proteomics improves cardiovascular risk prediction in secondary prevention. Eur. Hear. J. 2022, 43, 1569–1577. [CrossRef]
  173. Wu, J.; Giles, C.; Dakic, A.; Beyene, H.B.; Huynh, K.; Wang, T.; Meikle, T.; Olshansky, G.; Salim, A.; Duong, T.; et al. Lipidomic Risk Score to Enhance Cardiovascular Risk Stratification for Primary Prevention. JACC 2024, 84, 434–446. [CrossRef]
  174. Treskesm R,W.; van Winden, L.A.M.; van Keulen, N.; van der Velde, E.T.; Beeres, S.L.M.A.; Atsma, D.E.; Schalij, M.J. Effect of Smartphone-Enabled Health Monitoring Devices vs regular follow-up on blood pressure control among patients after myocardial infarction. JAMA Netw Open. 2020, 3, e202165.
  175. Shufelt, C.L.; Kim, A.; Joung, S.; Barsky, L.; Arnold, C.; Cheng, S.; Dhawan, S.; Fuller, G.; Speier, W.; Lopez, M.; et al. Biometric and Psychometric Remote Monitoring and Cardiovascular Risk Biomarkers in Ischemic Heart Disease. J. Am. Hear. Assoc. 2020, 9. [CrossRef]
  176. Hughes, J.W.; Tooley, J.; Soto, J.T.; Ostropolets, A.; Poterucha, T.; Christensen, M.K.; Yuan, N.; Ehlert, B.; Kaur, D.; Kang, G.; et al. A deep learning-based electrocardiogram risk score for long term cardiovascular death and disease. npj Digit. Med. 2023, 6, 1–9. [CrossRef]
  177. Awasthi, S.; Sachdeva, N.; Gupta, Y.; Anto, A.G.; Asfahan, S.; Abbou, R.; Bade, S.; Sood, S.; Hegstrom, L.; Vellanki, N.; et al. Identification and risk stratification of coronary disease by artificial intelligence-enabled ECG. eClinicalMedicine 2023, 65, 102259. [CrossRef]
  178. Naghavi, M.; Reeves, A.P.; Atlas, K.; Zhang, C.; Atlas, T.; Henschke, C.I.; Yankelevitz, D.F.; Budoff, M.J.; Li, D.; Roy, S.K.; et al. Artificial intelligence applied to coronary artery calcium scans (AI-CAC) significantly improves cardiovascular events prediction. npj Digit. Med. 2024, 7, 1–9. [CrossRef]
  179. Eslami, P.; Parmar, C.; Foldyna, B.; Scholtz, J.-E.; Ivanov, A.; Zeleznik, R.; Lu, M.T.; Ferencik, M.; Vasan, R.S.; Baltrusaitis, K.; et al. Radiomics of Coronary Artery Calcium in the Framingham Heart Study. Radiol. Cardiothorac. Imaging 2020, 2, e190119. [CrossRef]
  180. Zou, L.-M.; Xu, K.-T.; Wang, Y.-N. Research advances and applications of artificial intelligence in cardiac CT. Meta-Radiology 2024, 2. [CrossRef]
  181. Choi, A.D.; Marques, H.; Kumar, V.; Griffin, W.F.; Rahban, H.; Karlsberg, R.P.; Zeman, R.K.; Katz, R.J.; Earls, J.P. CT ​Evaluation ​by ​Artificial ​Intelligence ​for ​Atherosclerosis, Stenosis and Vascular ​Morphology ​(CLARIFY): ​A ​Multi-center, international study. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr. 2021, 15, 470–476. [CrossRef]
  182. Arnett, D.K.; Blumenthal, R.S.; Albert, M.A.; Buroker, A.B.; Goldberger, Z.D.; Hahn, E.J.; Himmelfarb, C.D.; Khera, A.; Lloyd-Jones, D.; McEvoy, J.W.; et al. 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2019, 140. [CrossRef]
  183. Upton, R.; Mumith, A.; Beqiri, A.; Parker, A.; Hawkes, W.; Gao, S.; Porumb, M.; Sarwar, R.; Marques, P.; Markham, D.; et al. Automated Echocardiographic Detection of Severe Coronary Artery Disease Using Artificial Intelligence. JACC: Cardiovasc. Imaging 2022, 15, 715–727. [CrossRef]
  184. Barzilai, D.H.; Cohen-Shelly, M.; Sorin, V.; Zimlichman, E.; Massalha, E.; Allison, T.G.; Klang, E. Machine learning in cardiac stress test interpretation: a systematic review. Eur. Hear. J. - Digit. Heal. 2024, 5, 401–408. [CrossRef]
  185. Pieszko, K.; Shanbhag, A.D.; Singh, A.; Hauser, M.T.; Miller, R.J.H.; Liang, J.X.; Motwani, M.; Kwieciński, J.; Sharir, T.; Einstein, A.J.; et al. Time and event-specific deep learning for personalized risk assessment after cardiac perfusion imaging. npj Digit. Med. 2023, 6, 1–11. [CrossRef]
  186. Meder, B.; Asselbergs, F.W.; Ashley, E. Artificial intelligence to improve cardiovascular population health. Eur. Hear. J. 2025, 46, 1907–1916. [CrossRef]
  187. Muse, E.D.; Topol, E.J. Transforming the cardiometabolic disease landscape: Multimodal AI-powered approaches in prevention and management. Cell Metab. 2024, 36, 670–683. [CrossRef]
  188. Fontanelli, L.; Castronovo, A.; Ferri, C.; Vozzi, F.; Recchia, F.A.; Borghini, A. iPSC-Derived Endothelial Cells as Experimental Models for Predictive and Personalized Strategies in Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 780. [CrossRef]
Figure 2. Phthalates-induced mechanisms related to ischemic heart disease. Image partly generated with AI Microsoft Copilot 365. Abbreviations: Akt1: protein kinase B; ATP: adenosine triphosphate; BMI: body mass index; C/EBPα: CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha; COX-2: cyclooxygenase-2; DEGs: differentially expressed genes; DMRs: differentially methylated regions; DNA: deoxyribonucleic acid; ΔΨm: mitochondrial membrane potential; ECE1: Endothelin Converting Enzyme 1; FABP4: fatty acid–binding protein 4; GSH: glutathione; IHD: ischemic heart disease; IL: interleukin; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; miR: microRNA; mtDNA: mitochondrial DNA; NLRP3: NOD-, LRR- and pyrin domain-containing protein 3; OxLDL: oxidized low-density lipoprotein; PARPγ: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; ROS: reactive oxygen species; SCNN1G: sodium channel epithelial 1 subunit gamma; SOD: superoxide dismutase; VSMC: vascular smooth muscle cell.
Figure 2. Phthalates-induced mechanisms related to ischemic heart disease. Image partly generated with AI Microsoft Copilot 365. Abbreviations: Akt1: protein kinase B; ATP: adenosine triphosphate; BMI: body mass index; C/EBPα: CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha; COX-2: cyclooxygenase-2; DEGs: differentially expressed genes; DMRs: differentially methylated regions; DNA: deoxyribonucleic acid; ΔΨm: mitochondrial membrane potential; ECE1: Endothelin Converting Enzyme 1; FABP4: fatty acid–binding protein 4; GSH: glutathione; IHD: ischemic heart disease; IL: interleukin; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; miR: microRNA; mtDNA: mitochondrial DNA; NLRP3: NOD-, LRR- and pyrin domain-containing protein 3; OxLDL: oxidized low-density lipoprotein; PARPγ: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; ROS: reactive oxygen species; SCNN1G: sodium channel epithelial 1 subunit gamma; SOD: superoxide dismutase; VSMC: vascular smooth muscle cell.
Preprints 197171 g002
Table 1. International regulatory restrictions on phthalate use.
Table 1. International regulatory restrictions on phthalate use.
Country Regulation Phthalate Reference
European Union 1999/815/EC: temporary restriction
on children’s toys
BBP, DEHP, DINP, DIDP, DnOP [48]
European Union Directive 2005/84/EC: permanent restriction on children’s toys and
articles
BBzP, DEHP, DnBP [51]
European Union Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/2005: maximum concentration of 0.1% by weight in plasticized material in all plastic products BBP, DBP, DEHP, DIBP [52]
European Union Question numbers: EFSA-Q-2017-00588/-00589/-00590, EFSA-Q-2018-00800/-00801: TDI of 0.05 mg/kg body weight per day BBP, DBP, DEHP, DINP [53]
European Union EU Regulation No. 2023/2482: restrictions to the use of DEHP in medical devices DEHP [55]
United States EPA-HQ-OPPT-2018-0435; EPA-HQ-OPPT-2024-0073: established risk for reproductive toxicity in female workers DIDP [57]
United States EPA-HQ-OPPT-2018-0436; EPA-HQ-OPPT-2024-0073: established risk for developmental toxicity, hepatotoxicity, and cancer at high exposure DINP [58]
China GB 26572-2025: maximum concentration of 0.1% by weight in electrical and electronic products BBP, DBP, DEHP, DIDP [59]
Abbreviations: BBP: butyl benzyl phthalate; BBzP: butylbenzyl phthalate DBP: di-n-butyl phthalate; DEHP: 2-ethylhexyl phthalate; DIBP: Diisobutyl phthalate; DIDP: di-iso-decyl phthalate; DINP: diisononyl phthalate; DnOP: di-n-butyl phthalate.
Table 2. Key findings and research gaps on phthalate exposure and ischemic heart disease.
Table 2. Key findings and research gaps on phthalate exposure and ischemic heart disease.
Clues Reference Pitfalls Reference
Serum MMP levels significantly related to the number of plaques in an inverted U-shaped manner [89] No significant association between circulating MEP levels and plaque GSM [89]
Serum MMP and MBzP levels significantly and inversely associated with IMT [89,97] No significant association of MEHP, MEP, and MiBP in serum with IMT [89]
MBzP, MiBP, and MMP in serum significantly and positively associated with IM-GSM and plaque GSM [89,97] No significant association between serum levels of MEP, MEHP, MiBP, and MMP and FRS [95]
MEP in serum significantly and positively associated with IM-GSM [89] Serum MBzP levels not significantly related to plaque prevalence [97]
Serum MEHP concentration inversely related to IM-GSM and plaque GSM [89] Cross-sectional design [32,89,95,97,99,105,106]
Circulating levels of MEHP and MMP associated with LDL-
cholesterol, MEP with diastolic blood pressure, and MiBP with fasting glucose
[95] Single-spot urine measurement [32,99,105,106,112]
Urinary MEHP concentration significantly and positively associated with serum levels of
CD31+/CD42a−, CD31+/CD42a+, and CD14
[99] Study performed exclusively on Caucasian individuals aged 70 [89,95,97]
Urinary MEHP, MnBP, and ∑DEHP levels significantly and positively associated with both maximal and mean values of carotid IMT as both continuous and categorical variables [105] No significant association of urinary MEHHP and MEHOP levels with EMPs and PMPs [99]
Urinary MEHP levels significantly and positively correlated with 5mdC/dG and carotid IMT [106] Study conducted on adolescents and young adults with abnormal urinalysis [99]
Significantly positive association of urinary levels of ∑DEHP, ∑LMWP, ∑HMWP, MEP, and MECPP significantly with hs-cTnI [32] No adjustment of associations for medications, genetics and other occupational environmental factors (e.g., bisphenol A, perfluorooctane sulfate, air pollutants) [99,105,106,112]
Phthalate co-exposure significantly associated with an increase in hs-cTnI percentage [32] Urinary concentration of MEHHP and MEHOP not significantly associated with carotid IMT [105]
Highest tertiles of urinary MEHP and MiBP significantly associated with increased risk of CHD [112] MEHHP and MEHOP not significantly associated either with carotid IMT or 5mdC/dG [106]
Increased serum concentration of hsCRP and D-dimer significantly and positively associated across tertiles of urinary ∑DEHP, MEHP, MEHHP, and MEHP [112] Study performed exclusively on young adults [106]
Increased serum concentration of fibrinogen significantly and positively associated across tertiles of urinary ∑DEHP,
MEHHP, and MEHP
[112] No measurement of methylation at specific gene loci [106]
No significant association of urinary concentration of MEHP, MEHHP, MEHOP, MCPP, MBzP, MMP, MBP, and MiBP, with hs-cTnI [32]
Underestimation of hs-cTnI due to its degradation if long stored under -80°C [32]
No significant association of urinary MEHHP,
MEHOP, ΣDEHP, MMP, MnBP, MBzP, MiBP with increased risk of CHD
[112]
Abbreviations: 5mdC/dG: ratio of 5-methyl-2'-deoxycytidine (5mdC) to deoxyguanosine (dG); ∑DEHP: sum of MEHP, MEHHP, and MEHOP; ∑HMWP: sum of ∑DEHP, MCPP, and MBzP; ∑LMWP: sum of MMP, MEP, MBP, and MiBP; CHD: coronary heart disease; EMP: endothelial microparticle; FRS: Framingham Risk Score; GSM: gray scale media; hs-cTnI: high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I; IMT: intima media thickness; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; MBzP: monobenzyl phthalate; MEHHP: mono(ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate; MEHOP: mono(2-ethly-5-oxoheyl) phthalate; MEHP: mono (2 ethylhexyl) phthalate; MEP: mono-ethyl phthalate; MiBP: mono-isobutyl phthalate; MMP: mono-methyl phthalate; MnBP: mono-n-butyl phthalate; PMP: platelet microparticle.
Table 3. In vitro, animal and human studies, supporting the correlation between phthalates exposure and IHD-promoting conditions.
Table 3. In vitro, animal and human studies, supporting the correlation between phthalates exposure and IHD-promoting conditions.
Oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis
Identified/
Described mechanisms
Biological meaning Models and treatments Methods References
MEHP → ↑ intracellular ROS, ↓ GSH, ↑ MDA → mitochondrial dysfunction → apoptosis Oxidative stress–mediated lipid peroxidation and mitochondrial damage leading to activation of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway in endothelial cells In vitro model: Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC)
Treatment: MEHP exposure at 0, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 μM; 24 h)
• Intracellular ROS measurement (DCFH-DA fluorescence assay)
• GSH content determination (colorimetric assay)
• Lipid peroxidation assessment via MDA levels (TBARS assay)
• Mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) analysis (JC-1 staining)
• Cytochrome c release (Western blot)
• Apoptosis assessment (Annexin V/PI flow cytometry)
• Caspase-9 and caspase-3 activation (Western blot / activity assays)
[103]
MEHP → autophagy activation → lysosomal destabilization → cathepsin B release → mitochondrial dysfunction → intrinsic apoptosis Autophagy-dependent lysosomal–mitochondrial crosstalk promotes endothelial apoptosis via activation of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway In vitro model: Human endothelial cells (HUVEC)
Treatment: MEHP exposure at 0, 25, 50, 100, and 200 μM; 6, 12, and 24 h
• Autophagy assessment (LC3-I/LC3-II conversion, Beclin-1 expression; Western blot)
• Autophagosome formation (GFP-LC3 fluorescence microscopy)
• Lysosomal membrane permeabilization (LysoTracker staining)
• Cathepsin B release and activity (Western blot and enzymatic assay)
• Mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) analysis (JC-1 staining)
• Cytochrome c release (Western blot)
• Apoptosis quantification (Annexin V/PI flow cytometry)
• Caspase-9 and caspase-3 activation (Western blot)
• Pharmacological inhibition of autophagy and cathepsin B to confirm pathway involvement
[118]
MEHP → ↑ ROS → Akt1 pathway inhibition → autophagy activation → autophagic cell death ROS-mediated Akt1 signaling disruption promotes excessive autophagy and autophagic cell death in endothelial cells In vitro model: Human vascular endothelial cells (EA.hy926)
Treatment: MEHP exposure at 0, 25, 50, 100, and 200 μM; 24 h
• Intracellular ROS measurement (DCFH-DA fluorescence assay)
• Autophagy markers analysis (LC3-I/LC3-II conversion, Beclin-1 expression; Western blot)
• Autophagosome formation (transmission electron microscopy; fluorescence microscopy)
• Akt1 pathway analysis (Akt1 phosphorylation status; Western blot)
• Pharmacological modulation of ROS (antioxidant pretreatment)
• Cell viability and autophagic cell death assays (MTT assay, LDH release)
[119]
DEHP → ↑ ROS, ↓ antioxidant defenses → PTGS2 (COX-2) upregulation → inflammation → apoptosis Oxidative stress–driven inflammatory signaling promotes cardiomyocyte injury and apoptotic cell death In vitro model: primary rat cardiomyocytes
Treatment: DEHP exposure at 0, 25, 50, 100, and 150 μM; 24, 48 h
• Intracellular ROS measurement (fluorescent ROS probes)
• Antioxidant system evaluation (GSH content, antioxidant enzyme activity assays)
• Lipid peroxidation assessment (MDA levels)
• Inflammatory pathway analysis (PTGS2/COX-2 expression; Western blot and qPCR)
• Pro-inflammatory cytokine measurement (ELISA)
• Apoptosis assessment (Annexin V/PI staining; caspase-3 activation)
• Cell viability assays (CCK-8 / MTT)
[120]
DEP/MEP → direct binding to SOD → structural destabilization → ↓ SOD catalytic activity → ↑ oxidative stress susceptibility Direct inhibition of antioxidant enzyme activity compromises cellular redox homeostasis, favoring oxidative stress In silico model: Human superoxide dismutase (SOD) structure
Treatment: Molecular interaction with DEP and its metabolite MEP
• Molecular docking analysis (DEP–SOD and MEP–SOD binding affinity and interaction sites)
• Molecular dynamics simulations to assess protein structural stability
• Analysis of conformational changes (RMSD, RMSF, radius of gyration)
• Evaluation of catalytic site perturbation and enzyme flexibility
[121]
DEHP → ↑ cardiac ROS, ↑ lipid peroxidation → dyslipidemia → ↑ atherogenic index Oxidative stress–induced cardiac damage and lipid metabolism alteration increase atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk Animal model: BALB/c mice (male)
Treatment: intraperitoneal administration of DEHP at 5, 50, and 200 mg/kg body weight daily for 30 consecutive days
• Cardiac oxidative stress evaluation (MDA levels; protein carbonyl content assays)
• Lipid peroxidation assessment (TBARS assay)
• Serum lipid profile analysis (total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-C, HDL-C)
• Atherogenic index calculation
• Histopathological analysis of cardiac tissue
[123]
DEHP → cholesterol homeostasis disruption + endothelial inflammation → accelerated atherosclerosis Chronic DEHP exposure promotes atherogenesis via lipid dysregulation and vascular inflammation Animal model: Apolipoprotein E–deficient mice (ApoE⁻/⁻, male)
Treatment: oral administration of DEHP at 1,500 mg/kg/day via drinking water for 4 weeks
• Serum lipid profile (total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C)
• Atherosclerotic lesion analysis (Oil Red O staining of aortic root and en face aorta)
• Endothelial inflammation markers (VCAM-1, ICAM-1; Western blot, immunohistochemistry)
• Macrophage infiltration in plaques
• Oxidative stress and inflammatory signaling evaluation
[124]
DEHP/MEHP → SPHK1/S1PR2 sphingolipid pathway activation → cardiomyocyte pyroptosis → cell death Disruption of sphingolipid metabolism triggers inflammatory programmed cell death, leading to myocardial injury Animal model: Male C57BL/6J mice
Treatment: oral administration of DEHP at 500 mg/kg/day via gavage for 28 consecutive days
• Histopathology (H&E staining; assessment of disorganized myocardial fibers, collagen deposition)
• Serum cardiac injury markers (CK-MB, CRP; ELISA)
• Pyroptosis assessment (caspase-1 activation; GSDMD cleavage; Western blot)
• Sphingolipid pathway analysis (SPHK1, S1PR2 expression; qPCR and Western blot)
• Pharmacological inhibition of SPHK1/S1PR2 to confirm pathway involvement
[125]
DMP → ↑ ROS → intrinsic (Bax/Bcl-2) & extrinsic (Fas/FasL) apoptotic pathways → caspase-dependent cardiomyocyte apoptosis Oxidative stress–mediated activation of multiple apoptotic cascades promotes cardiomyocyte death Animal model: Sprague-Dawley rats (male)
Treatment: intragastric (oral gavage) administration of DMP at 0, 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg/day
• Transcriptomic analysis for apoptotic gene expression (Bcl-2 family, Fas/FasL)
• Flow cytometry for apoptosis quantification (Annexin V/PI)
• Caspase activity assays (caspase-3, caspase-9)
• ROS measurement (DCFH-DA fluorescence assay)
• Evaluation of antioxidant status (GSH, SOD activity)
[126]
Phthalates → NLRP3 inflammasome activation → ↑ IL-1β, ↑ IL-18 → neutrophil & macrophage infiltration → cardiac inflammation Pro-inflammatory signaling and innate immune activation exacerbate myocardial injury Animal model: Male C57BL/6N mice
Treatment: acute exposure to DEHP via intraperitoneal injection at 30 mg/kg/day for 7 days during the recovery period following surgically-induced myocardial infarction
• NLRP3 inflammasome assessment (NLRP3, ASC, caspase-1 expression; Western blot)
• IL-1β and IL-18 quantification (ELISA)
• Histology & immunohistochemistry for neutrophil and macrophage infiltration
• Cardiac injury evaluation (histopathology, infarct size measurement)
[127]
DEHP → ↑ lipid peroxidation + mitochondrial damage → Nrf2/HO-1 pathway activation → ferroptosis in cardiomyocytes Oxidative stress–induced iron-dependent cell death contributes to cardiomyocyte injury Animal model: Male C57BL/6J mice
Treatment: oral gavage administration of DEHP at 50, 200, and 500 mg/kg body weight per day for 28 consecutive days.
• Lipid peroxidation assessment (MDA assay; TBARS)
• Mitochondrial damage evaluation (TEM; mitochondrial membrane potential assay)
• Ferroptosis markers (GPX4 expression, ACSL4, iron accumulation; Western blot, biochemical assays)
• Nrf2/HO-1 pathway analysis (Western blot, qPCR, immunohistochemistry)
• ROS measurement (DCFH-DA fluorescence)
[128]
DBP + high-fat diet → ↑ ROS, ↑ MDA, ↓ GSH → membrane & mitochondrial damage → activation of NLRP3 inflammasome, caspase-1, GSDMD → inflammatory + pyroptotic pathways → disrupted lipid metabolism & endocrine homeostasis → cardiac fibrosis & dysfunction Oxidative stress, inflammation, pyroptosis, and metabolic/endocrine disruption collectively promote structural myocardial damage and cardiotoxicity Animal model: Sprague-Dawley rats (male)
Treatment: oral gavage administration of DBP at 0.01, 1, and 50 mg/kg/day for 12 weeks combined with high-fat diet for sub-chronic period
• Oxidative stress measurement (ROS assay, MDA/TBARS, GSH levels)
• Mitochondrial function assays (mitochondrial membrane potential, morphology via TEM)
• Inflammatory & pyroptosis markers (NLRP3, caspase-1, GSDMD; Western blot, immunohistochemistry)
• Lipid profile & endocrine parameter evaluation (serum cholesterol, triglycerides, hormones)
• Cardiac histopathology (fibrosis assessment; Masson’s trichrome staining)
• Functional assessment (echocardiography, if included)
[129]
DEHP → TGF-β1/Smad/PAI-1 pathway activation in M1 macrophages → ↑ tissue factor–bearing microparticle release → procoagulant activity Vascular inflammation and enhanced thrombogenic potential contribute to CVD progression In vitro model: Human M1 macrophages
Treatment: DEHP at 0, 10, 50, and 100 μM; 24 h
• Microparticle isolation and quantification (flow cytometry, annexin V labeling)
• Tissue factor expression analysis (Western blot, qPCR)
• Signaling pathway assessment (TGF-β1/Smad/PAI-1; Western blot, inhibitor studies)
• Functional coagulation assays (procoagulant activity of microparticles)
[130]
Urinary phthalate metabolites (MEP, MBP, MiBP, MBzP, sum of six) → ↑ oxidative stress biomarkers (8-OHdG, MDA) → ↑ blood pressure & hypertension prevalence Phthalate-induced oxidative stress contributes to cardiovascular risk and elevated blood pressure in humans Human cohort: >1000 individuals
Treatment: No experimental treatment; observational study
• Urinary phthalate metabolite quantification (LC-MS/MS)
• Oxidative stress biomarkers in urine/plasma (8-OHdG, MDA; ELISA/HPLC)
• Blood pressure measurement (systolic/diastolic)
• Statistical correlation analysis (regression models, adjustment for confounders)
[131]
Urinary MEHP → ↑ MDA, ↓ SOD → oxidative stress associated with CHD Oxidative stress contributes to CHD pathology Human case-control study: CHD patients and matched controls
Treatment: No experimental treatment; observational study
• Urinary MEHP quantification (LC-MS/MS)
• Oxidative stress markers (MDA, SOD activity; ELISA/biochemical assays)
• Correlation/statistical analysis with CHD status
[35]
Urinary MEHP/DEHP metabolites → ↑ endothelial (CD31+/CD42a-) & platelet (CD31+/CD42a+) microparticles → activation of monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils (CD14) Microparticle release reflects apoptosis and inflammation contributing to atherosclerosis Human cohort: Adolescents and young adults
Treatment: No experimental treatment; observational study
• Urinary phthalate metabolite measurement (LC-MS/MS)
• Microparticle identification & quantification (flow cytometry: CD31, CD42a, CD14 markers)
• Correlation/statistical analysis between urinary metabolites and microparticle levels
[99]
Urinary DEHP metabolites → ↑ hs-CRP, fibrinogen, D-dimer → vascular inflammation & thrombosis Phthalate-induced oxidative/inflammatory stress promotes pro-atherothrombotic state in CHD patients Human case-control study: CHD patients
Treatment: No experimental treatment; observational study
• Urinary DEHP metabolite measurement (LC-MS/MS)
• Serum inflammatory and thrombotic marker quantification (hs-CRP, fibrinogen, D-dimer; ELISA/clinical assays)
• Statistical correlation analysis
[132]
Phthalate metabolites → binding to PI3K-Akt, JAK-STAT, BCL2, PIK3CA → oxidative stress, inflammatory signaling, apoptosis Oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis drive cardiovascular toxicity in cardiac and vascular cells In silico + human data: NHANES 2005–2018 dataset; computational network toxicology analysis
Treatment: No experimental treatment; observational / computational study
• Pathway enrichment analysis (PI3K-Akt, JAK-STAT, BCL2, PIK3CA)
• Protein-protein interaction network construction
• Molecular docking simulations (binding affinity between phthalates and target proteins)
• Integration with NHANES biomarker/exposure data
[33]
Mitochondrial DNA alterations and dysfunction
Identified/
Described mechanisms
Biological meaning Models and treatments Methods References
DEHP → ↑ mitochondrial ROS → oxidative damage to membranes, proteins, mtDNA; disrupted mitochondrial dynamics & biogenesis → defective oxidative phosphorylation, ↓ mtDNA copy number Mitochondrial redox imbalance and structural/functional impairment contribute to cardiomyocyte dysfunction and CVD risk In vitro models: human endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes
Treatment: DEHP from 10 to 100 μM; 24, 48 h
Animal model: C57BL/6 mice
Treatment: DEHP by oral gavage at 50, 200, and 500 mg/kg/day for 28 days
• ROS measurement (MitoSOX, DCFDA)
• Antioxidant enzyme activity (SOD, GSH)
• Mitochondrial membrane integrity (JC-1, TMRE)
• mtDNA copy number quantification (qPCR)
• Mitochondrial dynamics & biogenesis markers (Western blot, immunofluorescence)
• Oxidative phosphorylation assessment (Seahorse XF, ATP assays)
[34]
In vitro model: primary human vascular endothelial cells
Treatment: DEHP at 10, 50, and 100 μM; 24 h
Animal model: Sprague-Dawley rats
Treatment: DEHP at 100 and 400 mg/kg/day via oral gavage for 12 weeks
[30]
DBP → mitochondrial fragmentation, ↓ ΔΨm, ↓ ATP synthesis Collapse of mitochondrial bioenergetic capacity, contributing to cardiomyocyte/vascular cell dysfunction In vitro model: zebrafish (Danio rerio) ZF4 cells
Treatment: DBP exposure at 0, 10, 50, and 100 μM; 24 h
• Mitochondrial morphology (fluorescence microscopy, Mitotracker staining)
• Mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm; JC-1/TMRE)
• ATP content measurement (bioluminescence assay)
[143]
DBP → ↑ mtDNA lesions, ↓ mtDNA copy number → mtDNA release → cGAS-STING pathway activation mtDNA damage links mitochondrial dysfunction to cellular inflammation and contributes to cardiovascular risk Animal model: zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos and larvae
Treatment: DBP at 0.1, 1, and 10 μM in the aquatic medium; up to 7 days post-fertilization
• mtDNA damage assessment (long-amplicon qPCR, lesion quantification)
• mtDNA copy number quantification (qPCR)
• Cytosolic mtDNA measurement (PCR, imaging)
• cGAS-STING pathway activation (Western blot, immunofluorescence for cGAS, STING, downstream cytokines)
[144]
↓ mtDNA copy number → ↑ risk of atherosclerosis and major cardiovascular events Reduced mtDNA integrity is linked to higher susceptibility to CHD and CVD Human cohort: Leukocytes from >1000 individuals
Treatment: Observational study, no experimental treatment
• mtDNA copy number quantification (qPCR)
• Statistical association with cardiovascular outcomes
[134]
↓ mtDNA copy number → ↑ risk of CVD, CHD, HF, stroke, all-cause mortality mtDNA copy number is a robust biomarker of mitochondrial dysfunction and adverse cardiovascular outcomes Human observational studies: Multiple cohorts included in meta-analysis
Treatment: Observational, no experimental intervention
• Meta-analysis of observational studies
• Risk ratio (RR) calculation for CVD, CHD, HF, stroke, all-cause mortality
[145]
DNA methylation and non-coding RNAs
Identified/
Described mechanisms
Biological meaning Models and treatments Methods References
DBP → ↑ miR-139-5p → ↓ myocardin (MYOCD) → VSMC phenotypic switch (contractile → synthetic) Promotion of atherosclerotic plaque formation and instability In vitro model: s A7r5 rat vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs)
Treatment: DBP at 10 μM; 24 h
• miRNA expression (qPCR)
• MYOCD protein quantification (Western blot)
• VSMC phenotypic markers (immunofluorescence, α-SMA, SM22α for contractile; OPN, vimentin for synthetic)
• Functional assays for cell proliferation/migration (scratch assay, transwell)
[149]
DBP → ↓ miR-137-3p → ↑ SP1 → ↑ MCP-1 Enhanced monocyte recruitment to endothelium, promoting early atherogenesis In vitro model: EA.hy926 human vascular endothelial cells
Treatment: DBP at 10 μM; 24 h
• miRNA expression (qPCR)
• SP1 and MCP-1 protein levels (Western blot, ELISA)
• Monocyte adhesion assay (fluorescent-labeled monocytes)
[150]
DEHP → ↑ GAS5 (lncRNA) → sequestration of miR-145-5p → ↑ VSMC proliferation + ↑ apoptosis Promotion of vascular damage, plaque instability, and risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) In vitro model: RAW264.7 murine macrophages and rat vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs)
Treatment: DEHP at 100 μM; 24 h
• lncRNA and miRNA expression (qPCR)
• VSMC proliferation assay (BrdU, Ki-67 staining)
• Apoptosis assay (Annexin V/PI staining, caspase activity)
• Protein markers of VSMC phenotype (Western blot, α-SMA, SM22α)
[151]
perinatal DEHP exposure → ↑ Differentially methylated regions (DMRs) and ↑ differentially expressed genes (DEGs) → persistent alteration of cardiac cell-type proportion and composition Early-life epigenetic reprogramming of the heart that persistently modifies gene expression patterns and cardiac cellular architecture, predisposing to increased cardiovascular risk later in life Animal model: C57BL/6J mice (both sexes)
Treatment: DEHP at 25 mg/kg chow or control chow, starting 2 weeks prior to mating and continuing through pregnancy and lactation until weaning at postnatal day 21
• Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis (RRBS)
• Transcriptomic profiling (RNA-seq)
• Cell-type proportion inference
• Longitudinal epigenetic and gene expression analysis
[152]
DEHP (developmental exposure) → ↑ DMRs → persistent cardiac epigenetic reprogramming (sex-specific) Developmental DEHP exposure programs long-lasting, sex-dependent alterations in cardiac gene regulation, potentially increasing later-life CVD risk Animal model: C57BL/6J mice (both sexes)
Treatment: oral, DEHP at 25 mg/kg chow beginning 2 weeks prior to mating, continuing through pregnancy and lactation until weaning at postnatal day 21
• RRBS (DNA methylation profiling)
• RNA-seq (gene expression)
• DMR and DEG analysis (sex-stratified)
[153]
Prenatal phthalates → ↑ DNA methylation changes (ECE1, SCNN1G) → ↑ blood pressure in offspring Prenatal phthalate exposure epigenetically programs hypertension risk, linking early-life exposure to later cardiovascular dysfunction Human study: pregnant women (n = 198) during 3rd trimester and their preschool-age children
Treatment: No experimental treatment; observational exposure to phthalates (MMP, MEP, MEcPP)
• Urinary phthalate metabolites: LC–MS/MS
• Blood pressure measurement in children: standardized sphygmomanometry
• DNA methylation analysis: bisulfite conversion + targeted methylation assays (hypertension-related genes, e.g. ECE1, SCNN1G)
• Mediation analysis: statistical modeling
[154]
MEHP → ↑ global DNA methylation → ↑ carotid intima-media thickness Phthalate exposure is associated with epigenetic alterations that may contribute to early atherosclerotic changes Human study: young individuals, Taiwanese
Treatment: No experimental treatment; cross-sectional observational study
• Urinary DEHP metabolites quantified via LC–MS/MS
• Global DNA methylation measured in blood samples (ELISA-based 5-methylcytosine quantification)
• Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) assessed by ultrasound imaging
• Statistical correlation and regression analyses
[106]
MEHP → ↑ global DNA methylation → ↑ apoptotic microparticles (CD31+/CD42a-, CD14+) Phthalate exposure induces vascular cell apoptosis via epigenetic modulation, linking DNA methylation changes to subclinical vascular injury Human study: young individuals, Taiwanese
Treatment: No experimental treatment; cross-sectional observational study
• Urinary MEHP quantification: LC–MS/MS
• Serum apoptotic microparticles (CD31+/CD42a-, CD14+) measured by flow cytometry
• Global DNA methylation: ELISA-based 5-methylcytosine quantification
• Mediation analysis linking MEHP, DNA methylation, and microparticle levels
[155]
MMP/MBP → ↑ miR-146a → ↑ arterial stiffness Phthalate exposure modulates cardiovascular-related miRNAs, promoting subclinical vascular dysfunction linked to IHD risk Human study: adults Treatment: No experimental treatment; panel observational study • Urinary phthalate metabolites quantified via LC–MS/MS
• Plasma miRNAs (miR-146a and others) quantified by qRT-PCR
• Arterial stiffness measured via pulse wave velocity (PWV)
• Statistical mediation analysis linking phthalates, miRNAs, and PWV
[156]
MEHP → ↑ miR-155 / ↑ miR-208a → ↑ vascular inflammation / endothelial dysfunction Phthalate exposure modulates cardiovascular-related miRNAs, promoting atherogenesis and CHD risk Human study: CHD patients vs healthy controls
Treatment: No experimental treatment; case-control study)
• Urinary MEHP quantified via LC–MS/MS
• Plasma/serum miRNAs (miR-155, miR-208a) measured by qRT-PCR
• Statistical comparison between CHD patients and controls
[35]
Lipid accumulation
Identified/
Described mechanisms
Biological meaning Models and treatments Methods References
BBP → ↑ C/EBPα & ↑ PPARγ → ↑ adipogenesis / lipid accumulation Phthalate promotes preadipocyte differentiation and metabolic reprogramming, leading to enhanced lipid storag In vitro model: 3T3-L1 preadipocytes Treatment: BBP, 0.1–100 μM; 24 - 96 h • Lipid droplet visualization: Oil Red O staining, high-content cellomics imaging
• Gene/protein expression: qRT-PCR & Western blot for C/EBPα, PPARγ, downstream targets
• Metabolomics: LC–MS-based profiling; pathway analysis (glyceroneogenesis, fatty acid synthesis)
[159]
BBP → ↑ miR-34a-5p → ↑ adipogenesis / lipid accumulation Phthalate promotes preadipocyte differentiation through miRNA-mediated signaling, enhancing lipid storage even without exogenous adipogenic stimuli In vitro model: 3T3-L1 preadipocytes
Treatment: BBP, 1–50 μM; 48, 96 h
• Lipid accumulation: Oil Red O staining
• miRNA expression: qRT-PCR for miR-34a-5p
• Adipogenic markers (C/EBPα, PPARγ) assessed by Western blot and qRT-PCR
[160]
DEHP → ↑ PPARγ → ↑ Fabp4 → ↑ lipid accumulation Phthalate exposure promotes metabolic reprogramming and lipid storage during cardiomyogenic differentiation In vitro model: P19 embryonal carcinoma cells differentiating into cardiomyocytes Treatment: DEHP, 10–100 μM; 7 days • Gene/protein expression: qRT-PCR and Western blot for PPARγ and Fabp4
• Lipid accumulation: Oil Red O staining
• Cardiomyocyte differentiation monitored via immunostaining for cardiac markers
[161]
DBP → ↑ adhesion molecules / ↑ chemokines → ↑ monocyte adhesion Phthalate promotes endothelial activation, facilitating initiation and progression of atherosclerosis In vitro model: Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC)
Treatment: DBP, 1–50 μM; 24, 48 h
Animal model: Male C57BL/6 mice
Treatment: DBP, 50 mg/kg/day, oral gavage; 7 days
• Monocyte adhesion assay: fluorescently labeled monocytes co-cultured with endothelial cells
• Gene/protein expression: qRT-PCR & Western blot for adhesion molecules and chemokines
• Histological analysis in mice: immunostaining of vascular tissue for adhesion molecules
[162]
DEHP → ↑ oxLDL uptake → ↑ foam cell formation Phthalate promotes macrophage lipid accumulation and accelerates atherosclerotic plaque development In vitro model: Human THP-1 macrophages
Treatment: DEHP, 10–50 μM; 24–72 h
Animal model: ApoE-deficient mice, male, 8 weeks
Treatment: DEHP, 50 mg/kg/day, oral gavage; 12 weeks
• Foam cell formation: Oil Red O staining, microscopy
• Lipid uptake: fluorescently labeled oxLDL assay
• Lipid profile in mice: serum cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL/HDL measurement
• Histology: aortic plaque assessment via Oil Red O and immunostaining
[151]
DCHP → ↑ PXR activation → ↑ lipogenic & ceramide genes Phthalate promotes lipid synthesis and alters lipid homeostasis via nuclear receptor signaling Animal model: C57BL/6 mice, male
Treatment: DCHP, 50 mg/kg/day, oral gavage; 4 weeks
• Gene expression: qRT-PCR for PXR target genes (lipogenesis, ceramide synthesis)
• Protein expression: Western blot for PXR and downstream targets
• Lipid profiling: serum and hepatic lipid quantification
• Histology: liver tissue staining for lipid accumulation
[163]
Phthalate metabolites (MBP, MBzP, MEHP, MMP, MEOHP) → ↑ BMI / ↑ waist circumference / ↑ LDL-C / ↑ triglycerides Phthalate exposure associated with increased cardiometabolic risk and lipid accumulation in pediatric population Human cohort: Children and adolescents
Treatment: No experimental treatment; observational study
• Anthropometric measurements: BMI, waist circumference
• Blood biochemistry: LDL-C, triglycerides quantification
• Statistical analysis: correlation between urinary phthalate metabolite levels and cardiometabolic markers
[164]
Phthalate metabolites (MEHP, MBzP, MiBP, MMP) → ↑ risk of metabolic syndrome Phthalate exposure linked to dysregulated lipid homeostasis, central obesity, insulin resistance, ↑ triglycerides; established risk factors for atherosclerosis and IHD Human cohort: 25,365 individuals across 9 cross-sectional observational studies Treatment: No experimental treatment; observational • Anthropometric measures: waist circumference, BMI
• Blood biochemistry: triglycerides, fasting glucose, lipid profile
• Statistical analysis: association between urinary phthalate metabolites and prevalence of metabolic syndrome
[73]
Maternal urinary phthalate metabolites (DEP, DBP, DEHP) → ↑ BMI / ↑ risk of childhood overweight/obesity Prenatal phthalate exposure linked to metabolic disorders in offspring, promoting higher adiposity and obesity risk Human cohort: Mother-child pairs Treatment: No experimental treatment; prospective observational study Treatment: No experimental treatment; prospective observational study
• Maternal urinary phthalate metabolite quantification (DEP, DBP, DEHP)
• Child anthropometrics: BMI, weight-for-age, height-for-age
• Statistical analysis: association between maternal phthalate levels and child BMI/obesity outcomes
[165]
Abbreviations: 8-OHdG: 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine; ΔΨm: mitochondrial membrane potential; ACSL4: acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 4; Akt1: protein kinase B; alpha; ApoE⁻/⁻: apolipoprotein E–deficient; ASC: apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD; ATP: adenosine triphosphate; BBP: benzyl butyl phthalate; Bcl-2: B-cell lymphoma 2; BMI: body mass index; CAD: coronary artery disease; CCK-8: cell counting kit-8; CD14: cluster of differentiation 14; CD31: cluster of differentiation 31; CD42a: platelet glycoprotein Ia; cGAS: cyclic GMP-AMP synthase; CHD: coronary heart disease; CIMT: carotid intima-media thickness; CK-MB: creatine kinase–MB isoenzyme; COX-2: cyclooxygenase-2; CRP: C-reactive protein; CVD: cardiovascular disease; DBP: dibutyl phthalate; DCFH-DA: 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate; DCHP: dicyclohexyl phthalate; DEG: differentially expressed gene; DEHP: di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate; DEP: diethyl phthalate; DMP: dimethyl phthalate; DMR: differentially methylated region; ΔΨm: mitochondrial membrane potential; EA.hy926: human vascular endothelial cell line; ECE1: endothelin converting enzyme 1; ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; Fabp4: fatty acid binding protein 4; FasL: Fas ligand; GAS5: growth arrest-specific 5; C/EBPα: CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha; GFP-LC3: green fluorescent protein–microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3; GPX4: glutathione peroxidase 4; GSDMD: gasdermin D; GSH: glutathione; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HF: heart failure; HO-1: heme oxygenase-1; hs-CRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; HUVEC: human umbilical vein endothelial cells; ICAM-1: intercellular adhesion molecule 1; IHD: ischemic heart disease; IL-1β: interleukin-1 beta; IL-18: interleukin-18; JAK-STAT: Janus kinase–signal transducer and activator of transcription; JC-1: 5,5′,6,6′-tetrachloro-1,1′,3,3′-tetraethylbenzimidazolylcarbocyanine iodide; LC3: microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3; LC-MS/MS: liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; lncRNA: long non-coding RNA; M1: classically activated macrophages; MBP: monobutyl phthalate; MBzP: monobenzyl phthalate; MCP-1: monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; MDA: malondialdehyde; MEcPP: mono-(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate; MEHP: mono-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate; MEOHP: mono-(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate; MEP: monoethyl phthalate; MMP: mono-methyl phthalate; MiBP: mono-isobutyl phthalate; miR/miRNA: microRNA; MYOCD: myocardin; mtDNA: mitochondrial DNA; MTT: 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; NHANES: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; NLRP3: NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3; NO: nitric oxide; Nrf2: nuclear factor erythroid 2–related factor 2; oxLDL: oxidized low-density lipoprotein; PAI-1: plasminogen activator inhibitor-1; PI: propidium iodide; PI3K: phosphoinositide 3-kinase; PIK3CA: phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha; PPARγ: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; PTGS2: prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2; PWV: pulse wave velocity; PXR: pregnane X receptor; qRT-PCR: quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; RMSD: root mean square deviation; RMSF: root mean square fluctuation; ROS: reactive oxygen species; RR: risk ratio; RRBS: reduced representation bisulfite sequencing; SCNN1G: sodium channel epithelial 1 gamma subunit; SPHK1: sphingosine kinase 1; S1PR2: sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2; SOD: superoxide dismutase; SP1: specificity protein 1; STING: stimulator of interferon genes; TBARS: thiobarbituric acid reactive substances;; TEM: transmission electron microscopy; TF: tissue factor; TGF-β1: transforming growth factor beta; THP-1: human monocytic cell line; VCAM-1: vascular cell adhesion molecule 1; VSMC: vascular smooth muscle cell.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated