Submitted:
19 January 2026
Posted:
20 January 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Data Source
| Source Category | Quantity |
| Local Chronicles | 289 |
| Compiled Materials | 11 |
| Books and Monographs | 4 |
2.2. Data Processing
2.3. Analysis Method
2.3.1. Classification Methods
2.3.2. Administrative Division Processing.
2.3.3. Type Change
3. Results
3.1. Temporal and Spatial Changes in the Proportions of Crop Cultivation
3.2. Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Crop Planting Structure Types
3.3. Characteristics of Changes in Crop Planting Structure Types
4. Discussion
4.1. The Impact of Planting Structure on Carbon Emissions
4.1.1. Temporal Characteristics of Agricultural Carbon Emissions
4.1.2. Spatial Characteristics of Agricultural Carbon Emissions
4.2. Analysis of Driving Factors and Mechanisms
4.2.1. Analysis of Driving Factors of Agricultural Carbon Emissions
4.2.2. Analysis of the Driving Mechanism of Carbon Emission Changes
4.3. Comparison of Research Results and Uncertainty Analysis
4.3.1. Comparison with Other Research Results
4.3.2. Uncertainty Analysis
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Appendix A
References
- Wei, C. Historical trend and drivers of China's CO2 emissions from 2000 to 2020. Environ Dev Sustain 2024, 26, 2225–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byrne, B.; Liu, J.J.; Bowman, K.W.; Pascolini-Campbell, M.; Chatterjee, A.; Pandey, S.; Miyazaki, K.; van der Werf, G.R.; Wunch, D.; Wennberg, P.O.; et al. Carbon emissions from the 2023 Canadian wildfires. Nature 2024, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B.X.; Duan, M.S. Have China's emissions trading systems reduced carbon emissions? Firm-level evidence from the power sector. Appl Energ 2025, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sokal, K.; Kachel, M. Impact of Agriculture on Greenhouse Gas Emissions-A Review. Energies 2025, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.L.; Xiong, J.R.; Du, T.S.; Ju, X.T.; Gan, Y.T.; Li, S.; Xia, L.L.; Shen, Y.J.; Pacenka, S.; Steenhuis, T.S.; et al. Diversifying crop rotation increases food production, reduces net greenhouse gas emissions and improves soil health. Nat Commun 2024, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, R.S.; Lian, Z.Y.; Xu, D.D. Non-agricultural transfers and the restructuring of farmers'' cultivation: “grainification” or “non-grainification”. Chin J Eco-Agric 2025, 33, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Z.L.; Fang, X.Q.; Ye, Y.; Hu, Z.Q.; Zhao, Z.L. Optimization of cropland cover data in jilin province over the past 300 years and it's spatial-temporal change charateristics. Chin. J. Agric Resour Regional Plan 2025, 46, 53–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, R.; Fang, X.Q.; Yang, Y.D.; Yokozawa, M.; Ye, Y. A 28-time-point cropland area change dataset in Northeast China from 1000 to 2020. Earth Syst Sci Data 2024, 16, 4971–4994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, X.H.; Xu, Y.; Huang, P.; Yuan, D.; Song, C.H.; Wang, Y.T.; Cui, Y.L.; Luo, Y.F. Identifying Changes and Their Drivers in Paddy Fields of Northeast China: Past and Future. Agriculture-Basel 2024, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xin, F.F.; Xiao, X.M.; Dong, J.W.; Zhang, G.L.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, X.C.; Li, X.G.; Zou, Z.H.; Ma, J.; Du, G.M.; et al. Large increases of paddy rice area, gross primary production, and grain production in Northeast China during 2000-2017. Sci Total Environ 2020, 711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, N.; Luan, Y.J.; Wang, S.Y. Driving mechanism of carbon emissions in China’s agriculture and the economic decoupling effect. Environ Sci 2026, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.Y.; Wu, X.B. The impact of planting structure on agricultural carbon emissions. J Hebei Agric Sci 2026, 1–7.
- Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; Zhao, Z.H. Research om effects of grain crop p;amtomh changes om agricultural carbon emissions between provinces in China. Chin J Agric Resour Reg Plann 2023, 44, 29–38. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, C.; Hu, P.Q.; Diao, B.T.; et al. Environmental performance evaluation of policies in main grain producing areas:from the perspective of agricultural carbon emissions. Chin J Popul Resour Environ 2021, 31, 35–44. [Google Scholar]
- Tian, Y.; Zhang, J.B.; Li, B. Study on agricultural carbon emissions in China: measurement, spatiotemporal comparison and decoupling effect. Chin J Resour Sci 2012, 34, 2097–2105. [Google Scholar]
- Li, G.Z.; Li, Z.Z. Study on regional differences and influencing factors of carbon dioxide emissions in China. Chin J Popul Resour Environ 2010, 20, 22–27. [Google Scholar]
- Dai, X.W.; Yang, Y.X. Calculation, driving effect and temporal and spatial characteristics of carbon emissions in China's provincial planting industry from 2007 to 2016. J Sichuan Agric Univ 2020, 38, 241–250. [Google Scholar]
- Geeta, D.; Das, P. North-East India: a comprehensive geography; EBH Publishers (India), 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Zivaljevic, B.; Markovic, M.; Mimic, G.; Marko, O.; Woznicki, S. Multi-annual crop maps reveal cropping patterns in the Vojvodina region (Serbia). Int Conf Agro-Geoinf 2024, 65–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, B.W.; Soulard, C.E.; Walker, J.J. Crop type classification, trends, and patterns of central California agricultural fields from 2005 to 2020. Agrosys Geosci Env 2024, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.Q.; Xuan, F.; Dong, Y.; Huang, X.D.; Liu, H.; Zeng, Y.L.; Su, W.; Huang, J.X.; Li, X.C. Performance of GEDI data combined with Sentinel-2 images for automatic labelling of wall-to-wall corn mapping. Int J Appl Earth Obs 2024, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, X.Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.Q. Impacts of Crop Type and Climate Changes on Agricultural Water Dynamics in Northeast China from 2000 to 2020. Remote Sens-Basel 2024, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, G.Z. Study on the changes of planting structure in northeast china over the past 70 years. Chin Agric Hist 1985, 1, 12–21. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Y.J.; Zhang, P.Y.; Liu, S.W.; Tan, J.T. The spatio-temporal pattern change and optimum layout of grain production in the west of northeast china. Sci Geogr Sin 2016, 36, 1397–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M.; Zhen, S.J.; Gao, Q.; Li, Q.; Yan, J.Y. Research on the evolution characteristics of crop planting structure and adjustment countermeasures in Heilongjiang province. Chin J Agric Resour Regional Plan 2018, 39, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Y.; Ye, Y.; Jiang, J.F.; Fang, X.Q. Spatio-temporal changes of cropping types in northeast china during 1920-1940s. J Chin Hist Geogr 2025, 40, 96–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.H.; Tang, P.Q.; Fan, L.L.; Yang, P.; Wu, W.B. Spatio-temporal variation characteristics of planting structure in Northeast China from 1980 to 2010. Sci Agric Sin 2016, 49, 4107–4119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IPCC. Climate change 2021 : the physical science basis : Working Group I contribution to the 6th assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[J]. 2024, 2, 103–105. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, Q.X. Evolution of guidelines for greenhouse gas inventories and analysis and prospects of models, procedures and guidelines for the transparency framework. Adv Clim Change Res 2025, 21, 593–601. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Z.P. Estimation of Nitrous Oxide Emission of Farmland in China. Rural Ecol Environ 1997, 13, 51–55. [Google Scholar]
- Min, J.S.; Hu, H. Calculation of Greenhouse Gases Emission from Agricultural Production in China. Chin Popul Resour Environ 2012, 22. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, G.H.; Chen, G.X.; Wu, J.; et al. N₂O and CH₄ Fluxes from Typical Upland Fields in Northeast China. Chin J Appl Ecol 1995, 6, 383–386. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, S.B.; Su, W.H. Estimation of Nitrous Oxide Emission and Its Future Change in China. Chin Environ Sci 1993, 14, 42–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, K.W.; Chen, G.X.; Yang, S.H.; et al. Role of Several Upland Crops in N₂O Emission from Farmland and Its Response to Environmental Factors. Chin J Appl Ecol 1995, 6, 387–391. [Google Scholar]
- Shen, X.M.; Yan, R.; Jiang, M.D. How Does Planting Structure Change Affect the Agricultural Net Carbon Sink? Evidence from the Jiangsu Coastal Economic Belt. Ecol Indic 2025, 170, 112949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, N.; Luan, Y.J.; Zhang, Z.T. The Regional Differences and Driving Factors Decomposition of Agricultural Carbon Emissions in China Based on the LMDI Model. Environ Prot Sci 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, B.; Yu, Y. Simulation of Agricultural Carbon Emissions and Assessment of Emission Reduction Effects in Jalaid Banner Based on Synergistic Models. J Environ Eng Technol 2025, 15, 1958–1970. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, B.Y. Temporal and Spatial Evolution Characteristics of Agricultural Carbon Offset Rates in the Three Northeastern Provinces and Analysis of Carbon Emission Trends. Jilin Univ 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.T.; Bai, C.Q.; Xiao, W.W. Measurement and Decomposition of Agricultural Carbon Emissions in Northeast China Based on the LMDI Model. Agric Res Arid Areas 2017, 35, 145–152. [Google Scholar]









| Planting structure type | 1950s | 1960s | 1970s | 1980s | |||||||||||
| Dist. & Cnty. Count | Dist. & Cnty. Prop. | Ordering | Dist. & Cnty. Count | Dist. & Cnty. Prop. | Ordering | Dist. & Cnty. Count | Dist. & Cnty. Prop. | Ordering | Dist. & Cnty. Count | Dist. & Cnty. Prop. | Ordering | ||||
| Corn-soybean-wheat type | 25 | 15.9 | 1 | 43 | 22.4 | 2 | 29 | 14.9 | 2 | 33 | 16.8 | 2 | |||
| Single corn type | 21 | 13.4 | 2 | 47 | 24.5 | 1 | 76 | 39.0 | 1 | 84 | 42.9 | 1 | |||
| Single soybean type | 16 | 10.2 | 3 | 20 | 10.4 | 3 | 11 | 5.6 | 4 | 12 | 6.1 | 4 | |||
| Single sorghum type | 14 | 8.9 | 4 | 2 | 1.0 | 18 | 4 | 2.1 | 9 | 4 | 2.0 | 8 | |||
| Corn-soybean type | 13 | 8.3 | 5 | 6 | 3.1 | 6 | 1 | 0.5 | 14 | 3 | 1.5 | 10 | |||
| Sorghum-corn-soybean type | 13 | 8.3 | 6 | 3 | 1.6 | 14 | 1 | 0.5 | 17 | 1 | 0.5 | 17 | |||
| Millet-corn-soybean type | 12 | 7.6 | 7 | 9 | 4.7 | 5 | 2 | 1.0 | 11 | 1 | 0.5 | 14 | |||
| Single rice type | 8 | 5.1 | 8 | 5 | 2.6 | 8 | 10 | 5.1 | 5 | 9 | 4.6 | 5 | |||
| Sorghum-millet type | 7 | 4.5 | 9 | 1 | 0.5 | 21 | 0 | 0.0 | 27 | 0 | 0.0 | 27 | |||
| Sorghum-corn type | 5 | 3.2 | 10 | 2 | 1.0 | 19 | 0 | 0.0 | 25 | 0 | 0.0 | 25 | |||
| 1950s-1960s | 1960s-1970s | 1970s-1980s | 1950s-1980s | ||||||||
| Type changes | Dist. & Cnty. Count | Prop. (%) | Type changes | Dist. & Cnty. Count | Prop. (%) | Type changes | Dist. & Cnty. Count | Prop. (%) | Type changes | Dist. & Cnty. Count | Prop. (%) |
| Single rice type to single corn type | 7 | 4.7 | Corn-Soybean-Wheat type to single wheat type | 20 | 10.6 | Sorghum-Millet-Soybean type to single corn type | 8 | 4.1 | Corn-Soybean-Wheat type to single wheat type | 16 | 10.9 |
| Sorghum-Corn type to Sorghum-Millet-Soybean type | 5 | 3.4 | Rice-Corn-Soybean type to single corn type | 8 | 4.3 | Single wheat type to Corn-Soybean-Wheat type | 3 | 1.6 | Sorghum-Corn-Soybean type to single corn type | 9 | 6.1 |
| Sorghum-Corn-Soybean type to Millet-Corn-Soybean type | 5 | 3.4 | Millet-Corn-Soybean type to single corn type | 8 | 4.3 | Other changes | 15 | 7.8 | Single rice type to single corn type | 7 | 4.8 |
| Single soybean type to Corn-Soybean-Wheat type | 5 | 3.4 | Single corn type to Corn-Wheat type | 7 | 3.7 | No change | 167 | 86.5 | Corn-Soybean type to single corn type | 6 | 4.1 |
| Corn-Soybean type to single corn type | 4 | 2.7 | Single soybean type to single corn type | 7 | 3.7 | Summary | 193 | 100 | Millet-Corn-Soybean type to single corn type | 6 | 4.1 |
| Type |
Emission factor (kg(N2O)/hm2) |
Emission factor (g(CH4)/m2) |
Source |
| Rice | 0.24 | 8.93(Inner Mongolia)9.24(Liaoning)5.57(Jilin)8.31(Heilongjiang) | Wang Zhiping[30]; Min Jisheng[31]. |
| Corn | 2.53 | Huang Guohong[32]; Wang Shaobin[33]. | |
| Soybean | 2.29 | Huang Guohong; Yu Kewei[34]. | |
| Wheat | 0.4 | Yu Kewei[34]. | |
| Sorghum | 0.95 | Wang Zhiping[30]. | |
| Millet | 0.95 | Wang Zhiping[30]. |
| Type | 1950 | Race | 1960 | Race | 1970 | Race | 1980 | Race |
| Sorghum | 275.43 | 14.31 | 228.15 | 6.00 | 132.76 | 6.51 | 204.20 | 8.92 |
| Millet | 180.82 | 9.39 | 295.65 | 7.78 | 132.11 | 6.48 | 71.69 | 3.13 |
| Rice | 238.94 | 12.41 | 887.27 | 23.35 | 525.19 | 25.77 | 580.12 | 25.35 |
| Corn | 670.89 | 34.85 | 1372.63 | 36.13 | 820.90 | 40.28 | 1038.58 | 45.38 |
| Soybean | 540.82 | 28.09 | 951.68 | 25.05 | 400.26 | 19.64 | 354.17 | 15.47 |
| Wheat | 18.25 | 0.95 | 64.20 | 1.69 | 26.99 | 1.32 | 39.98 | 1.75 |
| Total | 1925.14 | 100.00 | 3799.58 | 100.00 | 2038.20 | 100.00 | 2288.75 | 100.00 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).