Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Nurses’ Perception of Nursing Care Quality and Associated Factors in Jimma Town Public Hospitals, 2023. A Mixed Study

Submitted:

10 January 2026

Posted:

13 January 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Abstract Background: Nurses’ perception of nursing care quality is related to their impression of the quality of care they deliver. There is a paucity of information about nurses’ perceptions of nursing care quality. Therefore, this study aimed to assess nurses’ perception of nursing care quality and associated factors in Jimma Town public hospitals, Southwest, Ethiopia, 2023 Methods: A mixed study design was employed among nurses working in Jimma Town public hospitals. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire and a semi-structured interview by simple random and purposive sampling techniques. Data were analysed using SPSS for quantitative data and narrative analysis for qualitative data. Result: Of the total 364 nurses about 50.50% (95%CI, 45. 39, 55.71) of them perceived nursing care quality delivered to the patient as good. Work experience of >10 years (AOR=5.16, 95%CI (1.87, 14.24), having an educational level of BSc and above (AOR=4.04, 95%CI (1.65, 9.95), working in referral hospital, (AOR=4.13, 95% CI, (1.72, 9.89)), working in the favorable work environment (AOR=3.29, 95%CI (1.90, 5.66) and being satisfied on one’s job (AOR=2.20, 95%CI (1.30, 3.74) were statistically associated with nurses perception of nursing care quality. Conclusion and Recommendation: Nurses working in Jimma Town public hospitals split in half on their perception of the nursing care quality they render to the patients. Therefore, nurses, hospitals, and nurse managers have to work together to address factors affecting nurses’ perception of nursing care quality.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Quality of care is prioritized by the healthcare sector all over the world, including Ethiopia. [1,2,3,4]. Nurses play a significant role in achieving high-quality health services through the provision of safe, effective, and efficient patient-centered care [5,6,7].
In nursing, quality of care is defined in terms of treating patients as a whole and meeting their physical, psychological, social, and spiritual needs or expectations with the aim of the best patient outcomes [8,9,10]. According to Donabedian, quality of care refers to the good interaction between structure, process, and outcome [11]. Whereas the Ministry of Health of Ethiopia (MOH) describes it in terms of care that is safe, effective, efficient, patient-centred, affordable, and timely delivered [12].
Nurses' perceptions of nursing care quality is related to their personal opinions, beliefs, and evaluations of the level and standard of care given to patients [13]. Additionally, the process through which nurses organize and provide care for patients is what nurses perceive as nursing care quality [14].
Despite efforts in different countries to improve nursing care quality [12,15,16,17] and some nurses having a good perception of the nursing care quality, studies from various countries have revealed that nursing care quality is perceived as poor by 16.3%, 29%, and 70.5% of nurses in Spain, China, and Jordan, respectively [18,19,20]. In Nigeria, 36% of nurses perceived it as poor [21].
Nurses perception of nursing care quality influenced by work overload, nurse-patient communication, technical competencies, nurse-physician relationships, experience, adequacy of resources, management and leadership styles, and inter-professional collaboration [22,23,24,25,26]. According to the Ethiopian context, there is a focal information gap about how these characteristics influence nurses' perceptions of nursing care quality.
Additionally, only a few previous studies covered the perspective of patients, nurse supervisors, and physicians on nursing care quality but there is a paucity of information about how nurses perceive the quality of care they deliver for the patients. Therefore, identifying factors that affect nursing care quality based on the perception of nurses is important to enhance good patient outcomes and design an appropriate strategy to provide quality nursing care. Thus, this study aimed to assess nurses’ perception of nursing care quality and its associated factors in Jimma Town public hospitals.

2. Method and Materials

2.1. Study Design

A mixed study design was conducted in Jimma Town public hospitals from May 21 to June 21, 2023. Jimma Town is located 352 kilometers from Addis Ababa, the capital city of Ethiopia. According to the 2021 population projection, the total population of Jimma Town is 239,022 [27]. According to the Jimma Town Health Department report, there are two public hospitals and four health centers in Jimma Town. The current study was conducted at Jimma Medical Centre and Shenen Gibe General Hospital. The study examined the relationships between nurses' perception of nursing care quality and nurses’ personal characteristics, organizational factors, nurses' work environment, and job satisfaction.

2.2. Population

All nurses working in Jimma Town public hospitals were the source population. The study population was all sampled nurses and nurse Managers, supervisors, head nurses, and nurses who are working as quality officers working in Jimma Town public hospitals. All nurses who had served six months or more in Jimma Town public hospitals and were available during the data collection period were included in the study by using a simple random sampling procedure, which is a computerized method and purposive sampling was used for qualitative data. Finally, 364 nurses and nine key informants’ were included in the study.

2.3. Sample Size Determination

The sample size was calculated by using a single population proportion formula Z ( α / 2 ) 2 P ( 1 - P ) d 2 with 95% Confidence level, 5% margin of error, and a Proportion of nurses with a good perception of nursing care quality in Bale zone hospitals was 67.4% [9], a 10% non-response rate was added and the final sample size was 372. For the qualitative study, nine key informants were selected for in-depth interviews from Jimma town public hospitals. The number of key informants was determined by saturation of data or until data repeated the prior interviews and no new information was revealed.

2.4. Data Collection Instrument and Technique

Data was collected using self-administered questionnaires. The questionnaire comprises five parts. The first is nurses’ personal characteristics-related questions. The second is organizational factors-related questions. The third is nurses’ perception of nursing care quality-related questions which were adapted from the quality of nursing care scale developed by Martins, Gonçalves, Ribeiro, and Tronchin [28], which contains seven subscales. These include Patient satisfaction, health promotion, prevention of complications, well-being and self-care, functional readaptation, nursing care organization, and responsibility and rigor. This tool contains 25 items and is rated into four Likert-type scales; [1] never; [2] rarely; [3] often; [4] always. The reliability of the tool was checked by using Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of 0.93 for overall scales. It is categorized based on the mean score of nursing care quality scale questions as perceived good nursing care quality if nurses' response is greater or equal to the overall mean score and perceived poor nursing care quality if nurses' response is less than the overall mean score [7].
The fourth category consisted of questions focused on nurses’ work environments. These questions were adopted from the practice environment scale of the nursing work index [29] and grouped into five subscales. The subscales included Nurse Participation in hospital affairs (nine items), nursing foundation for quality of care (ten items), Nurse Manager ability in leadership and support of nurses (five items), Staffing, resource adequacy, and workload (four items), and collegial relations between nurses and physicians (three items). Based on the mean, the nurse work environment is grouped into [30] favorable work environment if the nurses’ response mean is greater than or equal to 2.5 and unfavorable Work environment if the nurses' response mean is less than 2.5.
The last part is the nurses’ job satisfaction-related question, containing 20 items and rated on a 5-point Likert scale with 1 strongly dissatisfied and 5 strongly satisfied. The questionnaire was adopted from the Minnesota satisfaction questionnaire and it is categorized based on the overall sum of satisfaction items as satisfied if nurses scored the sums of all the satisfaction items more than 60 and dissatisfied if nurses scored the sums of all the satisfaction items 60 and below [31]. Qualitative data was collected by the principal investigator using a semi-structured interview guide. The investigator was engaged by listening attentively to participants' responses, encouraging the participants to share their perceptions about nursing care quality, and using probing. The interviews were conducted by translating into Afan Oromo and Amharic languages and lasted thirty to thirty-six minutes. Permission was asked for the audio recording of an interview guide. All interviews were recorded and transcribed.

1.1. Data Analysis Procedures

First, data facilitator was oriented on the objective of the study, confidentiality of information, participant’s rights, and informed consent before the actual data collection. The reliability of the instruments was checked by a pre-test on 5% (19 nurses) of the total sample size at Agaro General Hospital two weeks before data collection. Based on the pre-test results, a necessary correction was made to the questionnaire. Principal investigators and data facilitators checked the data for its completeness.
The data was checked for completeness. Then the data were entered into Epidata version 4.6, then exported to SPSS version 25. A bivariate binary logistic regression was used to sort the candidate variables for multivariable logistic regression having a p-value less than or equal to 0.25, and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the significant association of independent variables with nurses' perception of nursing care quality. The final statistical significance was declared at a p-value <.05 and a 95% confidence interval. Multicollinearity was checked to see the linear correlation among the independent variables by using the variance inflation factor and tolerance test (VIF < 2.07, tolerance test > 0.48). Model fitness was checked by Hosmer and Lemeshow’s test of goodness of fit, which was found to be insignificant (P-value = 0.67), and the Omnibus test, which was significant (p-value = 0.000), which indicates the model was fitted. For qualitative data was analysed by using narrative analysis. Then, the final result was discussed by triangulating with quantitative findings in the form of texts, tables, and graphs.

3. Result

3.1. Sample Characteristics

The data consists of nurses from various backgrounds in terms of age, gender, educational level, marital status, work experience, and monthly salaries. Of the total nurses, 364 nurses participated in this study, giving a 97.80% response rate, and 2.20% of respondents did not return a complete questionnaire. The mean age of nurses was 31.84 + 5.91 SD, and 78.00% of them were between the ages of 18 and 35 years. Of the total nurses, 61.50% were female.
Three hundred thirty (90.70%) nurses have a bachelor's degree and above educational level. Of the total nurses, two hundred forty-one (66.20%) were married. The mean of the respondents’ years of experience was 6.49 + 3.37 SD, and 48.60% of nurses have experience less than or equal to 5 years. The mean of nurses’ monthly salary was 7191.12 +1285.73 SD, and two hundred thirty-seven (65.10%) nurses got a monthly salary between 5000 and 8000 (Table. 1).
For qualitative, nine nurses who have a position in the hospital, such as quality officer, nurse director, nurse supervisor, and head nurse, participated in in-depth interviews. Seven of the nurses were bachelor's degree holders. Five of them have greater than or equal to ten years of work experience (Table 2).

3.2. Organizational Factors

Of the total number of respondents, the majority of nurses, 329 (90.40%), were working in a referral hospital. Among the total number of nurses, 190 (52.20%) were working in two-shift schedules, while 99 (27.20%) were working in three-shift schedules. Additionally, out of the sixteen working units, 52 (14.30%) nurses were working in OR units, followed by 49 (13.5%), 44 (12.10%), and 40 (11.00%) in the Pediatric unit, OPD, and surgical unit respectively.

3.3. Nurses’ Work Environment

The study shows that 231 (65.10%) nurses perceived their work environment as favorable. Concerning the five nurses' work environment subscales, a higher mean score was observed in the collegial relationship between nurse and physician (mean = 2.84, SD = 0.71) and nursing foundation for quality of care (mean = 2.83, SD = 0.53) subscales. This revealed that nurses were comfortable with teamwork between physicians and nurses and nurses’ involvement in nursing care quality. More than half of nurses reported that the working environment was not conducive in terms of staffing, resource adequacy, and workload (53.80%). Two hundred seventy-nine (76.60%) nurses reported that there is no continuous training program for nurses; on the contrary, 82.30% of nurses reported that there is an active quality assurance and enhancement program (Table 3).

3.4. Nurses’ Job Satisfaction

The overall job satisfaction among nurses working in Jimma Town public hospitals was 38.20%. Concerning nurses’ job satisfaction items, two hundred twelve (58.30%) nurses responded that they are satisfied with the feeling they get after accomplishing their job. Concerning their payment, only twenty-four (6.50%) nurses are satisfied with their payment. Also, only 16.80% and 18.70% of nurses are satisfied with their working conditions and the praise they receive after completing their jobs.

3.5. Perceived Nursing Care Quality

On a 1-4-point scale, the overall mean score for perceived nursing care quality as rated by nurses was 2.98 (SD = 0.52). About 184 (50.50%) (95% CI, 45.39, 55.71) nurses perceived nursing care quality as good. Considering each subscale of perceived nursing care quality, a higher mean score was observed in nursing care organizations (mean = 3.39, SD = 0.60), while functional readaptation rated the lowest (mean = 2.70, SD = 0.61).
Of the total items of perceived nursing care quality, skilful use of the nursing record system (mean = 3.49, SD = 0.69), their knowledge about hospital policy (mean = 3.40, SD = 0.79), and their responsibility for the decisions they make, practice, and delegate to prevent complications were rated the highest (mean = 3.37, SD = 0.75). This revealed that nurses possess a strong level of skill and knowledge regarding the nursing record system, a good understanding of their hospital's policies and they take responsibility for their decisions. Conversely, planning patient discharge (mean =2.07, SD = 1.01) and supervising the activities they delegate rated the lowest (mean = 2.16, SD = 1.02). This suggests that nurses are less likely to engage in thorough planning for patient discharge and effectively supervise activities they delegate to others (Table 4).
The majority of qualitative key informants also believe that the nursing care quality they deliver should satisfy patients, meet the standard of care, and enhance patient recovery through respectful and compassionate care.
For example one of the key informants said. “….When patients are satisfied with the nursing care they receive; this is referred to as nursing care quality. ……” (Participant 3) while the others stated that
“…Nursing care quality means providing nursing care according to the standard…” (Participant 4); “….If a nurse is kind, and gives care for everyone as his brother, father, and family and thinks that what happens to the patient can happen to my family tomorrow, I think that is nursing care quality....” (Participant 6); “…Nursing care quality is when the patient recovers from the disease after nurses provide nursing care...” (Participant 5)

3.6. Factors Associated with Nurses’ Perception of Nursing Care Quality

Based on the bivariate analysis, eight variables, namely sex, educational level, hospital level, working unit, work schedule, experience, nurses' work environment, and nurses' job satisfaction, were identified as candidate variables for multivariable logistic regression.
In multivariable logistic regression, five variables were found to be statistically significant with nurses’ perception of nursing care quality. Those variables, including nurses' work experience, educational level, hospital level, work environment, and job satisfaction, were significantly associated with nurses’ perception of nursing care quality.
Nurses with more than 10 years of experience were 5.16 times more likely to rate nursing care quality as good than those with five or fewer years of experience. [AOR = 5.16, CI = 95% (1.87, 14.24), p = 0.002].
Concerning nurses’ educational level, nurses who had a BSc and above educational level were 4.04 times more likely to rate nursing care quality as good than those nurses who had a diploma educational level. [AOR = 4.04, CI = 95% (1.65, 9.95), p = 0.002].
A key informant perceived that a well-educated nurse appeared to be necessary to provide nursing care quality. “….Degrees and diplomas are not the same when it comes to delivering nursing care. As your educational level increases, nursing care quality you deliver will also increase...” (Participant 2)
Regarding organizational factors, nurses who work in referral hospital were 4.19 times more likely to rate nursing care quality as good than those who work in general hospital. [AOR = 4.13, CI = 95% (1.72, 9.89), p = 0.001].
Relating to the work environment, nurses who work in a favorable work environment were 3.29 times more likely to rate nursing care quality as good than those who work in unfavorable work environments. [AOR = 3.29, CI = 95% (1.90, 5.66), P < 0.001].
This is supported by qualitative findings. A key informant reports that the imbalance between the number of nurses and patients is considered one of the factors that hinder nurses from providing quality nursing care. ".....When we see the ratio of nurses to patients in our hospital, it's surprising, and it is difficult in terms of the quality of nursing care because one nurse provides care for 20 patients; it is not possible to provide quality nursing care in this mode, even though it is decreasing". (Participant 5)
Also, another key informant perceived that continuous training is important to provide nursing care quality, “…. Science is dynamic. For example, in the past, when a baby was born, we turned them down, and we blew on their back. Now, however, that science is considered as a traditional. If they are not trained, they practice that tradition. So updated science is now called evidence-based. Evidence-based care means that someone is trained and knows what science says currently. If not, they can malpractice on the patient…” (Participant 9)
Additionally, key informants perceived that nursing care quality can also be influenced by management. "…. I have worked for at least ten years. I have seen different management styles; all of them manage this hospital based on their own needs rather than those of patients or staff. Many are based on the desires for how to get their future growth or on the desires of the above manager. This leads to staff dissatisfaction with their jobs, which leads them not to deliver nursing care quality for their patients …" (Participants 9)
Regarding nurses’ job satisfaction, nurses who are satisfied with their jobs were 2.20 times more likely to rate nursing care quality as good than those who are dissatisfied. [AOR = 2.20, CI = 95% (1.30, 3.74), p = 0.004]. This is supported by qualitative findings (Table 5).
A key informant explained that nurses tend to provide nursing care quality to their patients when they feel satisfied with their jobs. "…About 60% of care was covered by nurses, but our salary is not related to the work. There is no incentive; duty is not paid on time, and there are no other benefits. Other professionals have services for home, transportation, a loan service, a card, and an allowance, but nurses work for a community and are exposed to many risks; no one cares for them. So, the staffs have been disappointed and dissatisfied. Not only have they become dissatisfied, but they are also changing their profession, which leads to decreased nursing care quality…." (Participant 5) (Table 5).

4. Discussion

The study's findings indicate that nurses' perception of nursing care quality at public hospitals in Jimma Town split in half. About 50.50% of nurses felt that nursing care quality was good, while their perception varied depending on their level of education, experience, the type of hospital, the work environment, and their job satisfaction. This suggests that the nursing care provided to patients may not have been up to the expected standard. This could potentially lead to negative consequences such as healthcare-associated infection, wastage of resources, morbidity, and mortality.
The finding of this study is in line with the finding of a study done in Egypt, where 51.90% of nurses perceive nursing care quality as good [32]. But lower than the findings of studies done in Spain (83.7%) [19]. The discrepancy might be due to the high nurse-to-patient ratio, lack of adequate resources, and low nurses' work experience in this study. In Spain, the mean of nurses' work experience was 16.4 years, and the ratio of nurses to patients was 1:8. Additionally, the length of the study period was two years. These factors may have contributed to a discrepancy in the perceived nursing care quality provided, especially when compared to developed countries. This finding is also lower than the study done in the Bale zone (67.4%] [9]. This discrepancy might be due to differences in the sample size. In Bale, only 43 nurses participated, and only one item was used to measure their perception of nursing care quality.
Nurses with more than ten years of experience were five times more likely to rate nursing care quality as good than those with five or fewer years of experience. This is consistent with the findings of studies conducted in Canada, Japan, and Saudi Arabia [7,33,34]. The possible explanation might be that as nurses grow with experience, they may consider various aspects to compare in judging the current condition of nursing care quality. Their years of experience give them a deep understanding of patient needs, technical skills, and knowledge regarding nursing care quality [34].
Concerning nurses’ educational level, nurses who had a BSc and above educational level were four times more likely to rate nursing care quality as good than those nurses who had a diploma educational level. This is consistent with the study findings from Iraq, Taiwan, and California [35,36,37]. The possible reason might be higher educational levels equip nurses with advanced knowledge and skills in various aspects of nursing care [35]. Additionally, nurses with BSc degrees and above have undergone a broader range of theoretical knowledge, practical skills, and evidence-based practice, which may contribute to their higher perception of nursing care quality.
Regarding organizational factors, nurses who work in referral hospital were four times more likely to rate nursing care quality as good than those who work in general hospital. This is consistent with the findings of studies conducted in California and Turkey [25,37]. The possible reason might be that the referral hospital has more equipment and more experienced nurses, and they get more support from students who practice in the hospital than those nurses who work in the general hospital. Such factors may contribute to the higher rate of nursing care quality they deliver in referral hospitals. Referral hospitals have higher resources and more advanced technology than other hospitals, which may also contribute to the higher rate of nursing care quality [37].
Regarding the work environment, nurses who work in a favorable work environment were three times more likely to rate nursing care quality as good than those who work in unfavorable work environments. This is consistent with the findings of studies done in Virginia, China, and Jordan, [18,20,38]. The possible reason might be a favorable nurses' work environment makes nurses feel happier about their care [39]. Adequate staffing and a supportive work environment create conditions that promote high nursing care quality and contribute to their confidence in the care they provide [40]. This may contribute to the higher rate of nursing care quality in a favorable work environment.
Regarding nurses’ job satisfaction, nurses who are satisfied with their jobs were two times more likely to rate nursing care quality as good than those who are dissatisfied. This is consistent with the findings of studies done in Minnesota, Turkey, Canada, and Pakistan [25,40,41,42]. The possible reason might be when nurses are satisfied with their pay, working conditions, how their manager handles them, the relationships of their co-workers, and hospital policy, it creates a conducive environment for providing nursing care quality. Satisfied nurses are more likely to be engaged, motivated, and committed to providing high nursing care quality to their patients [42]. Such factors may contribute to the higher rate of nursing care quality among nurses who are satisfied with their jobs.

5. Conclusions

Nurses working in Jimma Town public hospitals split in half on their perception of the nursing care quality they render to patients, which is lower than the previous findings of the studies done in both developing and developed countries. Nurses’ work experience, educational level, hospital level, nurses' work environment, and nurses’ job satisfaction were the identified independent variables that had a significant effect on nurses’ perception of nursing care quality. Therefore, Hospital and nurse managers have to create a favorable nurse work environment to establish good working conditions and work in a way that increases nurses’ job satisfaction.

Author Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to the article. Birhanu Wogane Ilala: conceptualization, data curation, investigating, methodology, resource, software, validation, visualization and writing original draft of this manuscript; Gugsa Nemera Germossa (PhD): conceptualization, data curation, investigating, methodology, resource, software, project administration, supervision, validation and visualization; Tigist Serawit: conceptualization, data curation, investigating, methodology, resource, software, project administration, supervision, validation and visualization; Duguma Debela Genati: conceptualization, data curation, investigating, methodology, resource, software, supervision, validation and visualization; Midhagsa Dhinsa Kitila: conceptualization, data curation, investigating, methodology, resource, software, supervision, validation and visualization; Firaol Regea Gelassa: conceptualization, data curation, investigating, methodology, resource, software, supervision, validation and visualization, Lencho Kajela Solbana: conceptualization, data curation, investigating, methodology, resource, software, supervision, validation and visualization, Diriba Etana Tola: conceptualization, data curation, investigating, methodology, resource, software, supervision, validation and visualization.
Acknowledgment: The authors acknowledge Jimma Town public hospital administrators, data collectors, and study participants.
Ethical consideration: An ethical clearance letter was obtained from the Ethical Review Board (ERB) of Jimma University, the Institute of Health, Ref. No. JUIH/IRB/399/23. Official letters were submitted to both hospitals, and ethical clearance letters were also obtained from Jimma University institute of health and submitted to each hospitals. Written informed consent was obtained from the study participants. All nurses were informed about the purpose of the study. The participants were informed that their participation was voluntary and could be withdrawn at any time for any reason without penalty. Confidentiality is also assured by omitting participants’ names from the informed consent form. This decision was in accordance with the National Research Ethics Review Guideline, and was consistent with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Abbreviations

ANA-American Nurse Association, AOR: Adjusted Odd Ratio, COR: Crude Odd Ratio, FDRE- Federal Democratic Republic Ethiopia, IRB -Institutional Review Board, JUIH – Jimma University Institution of Health, MOH-Ministry of health, OPD-Out Patient Department, OR-Operation Room, PhD- Doctor of Philosophy, VIF- Variance Inflation Factor

References

  1. Ryan C, Powlesland J, Phillips C, Raszewski R, Johnson A, Banks-Enorense K, et al. Nurses’ perceptions of quality care. J Nurs Care Qual. 2017;32(2):180–5.
  2. Kruk ME, Gage AD, Arsenault C, Jordan K, Leslie HH, Roder-DeWan S, et al. High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Glob Heal [Internet]. 2018 Nov 1 [cited 2023 Jan 20];6(11):e1196–252. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30196093/. [CrossRef]
  3. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia MOH. Implementation, Woreda Transformation. 2017;(October).
  4. Cherie A. Survey on the Quality of Care Standards in a Nursing / Midwifery Training Hospital at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital in Addis Ababa ,. 2020; [CrossRef]
  5. Apostolidi TP, Apostolidi N, Malliarou M. How Nurses Perceive Care and Their Relationship with Their Compassion: A Literature Review. Int J Caring Sci [Internet]. 2022;15(1):1–702. Available from: www.internationaljournalofcaringsciences.org.
  6. Yamamoto-Mitani N, Saito Y, Takaoka M, Takai Y, Igarashi A. Nurses’ and Care Workers’ Perception of Care Quality in Japanese Long-Term Care Wards: A Qualitative Descriptive Study. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2018;5. [CrossRef]
  7. Alshehry AS, Alquwez N, Almazan J, Namis IM, Cruz JP. Influence of workplace incivility on the quality of nursing care. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(23–24):4582–94. [CrossRef]
  8. Peršolja M. The quality of nursing care as perceived by nursing personnel: Critical incident technique. J Nurs Manag. 2021;29(3):432–41. [CrossRef]
  9. Darega B, Dida N, Letimo T, Hunde T, Hayile Y, Yeshitla S, et al. Perceived Quality of nursing Cares Practices in Inpatient Departments of Bale Zone Hospitals, Oromiya Regional State, Southeast Ethiopia Facility - Based Cross Sectional Study. Qual Prim Care. 2016;24(1):39–45.
  10. Stavropoulou A, Rovithis M, Kelesi M, Vasilopoulos G, Sigala E, Papageorgiou D, et al. What Quality of Care Means? Exploring Clinical Nurses’ Perceptions on the Concept of Quality Care: A Qualitative Study. Clin Pract. 2022;12(4):468–81. [CrossRef]
  11. Neves TMA, Parreira PMSD, Graveto JMGN, Freitas MJB dos S de, Rodrigues VJL. Nurse managers’ perceptions of nurse staffing and nursing care quality: A cross-sectional study. J Nurs Manag [Internet]. 2020 Apr 1 [cited 2022 Oct 7];28(3):625–33. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jonm.12966 . [CrossRef]
  12. Ethiopian Ministry Of Health (MOH). ETHIOPIAN NATIONAL HEALTH CARE QUALITY STRATEGY 2016-2020: Transforming the Quality of Health Care in Ethiopia. 2016;1–63. Available from: file:///C:/Users/PC/Downloads/ethiopian-national-health-care-quality-strategy (1).pdf.
  13. Hemşirelerin Bireysel M ve ÇOÖBKAE. The Effect of Nurses ’ Individual , Professional and Work Environment Characteristics on Their Perception of Quality of Nursing Care. 2021;139–47.
  14. Weber DJ, Sickbert-bennett EE, Brown VM, Brooks RH, Kittrell IP, Featherstone BJ, et al. at a University Hospital. 2014;28(3):2005–8.
  15. World Health Organization. Service delivery and safety,The High 5s Project. 2013;
  16. ANA. Quality Improvement in Nursing | [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Jul 31]. Available from: https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/health-policy/health-system-reform/quality/.
  17. Kenneth M, Yitambe A, Nyamari J, Koome G. Nurses’ Perception on Healthcare Services Quality in Mission Hospitals in Kiambu County, Kenya. Afr J Health Sci. 2019;32(1):5–17.
  18. You L ming, Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Liu K, He G ping, Hu Y, et al. Hospital nursing, care quality, and patient satisfaction: Cross-sectional surveys of nurses and patients in hospitals in China and Europe. Int J Nurs Stud [Internet]. 2013;50(2):154–61. Available from: . [CrossRef]
  19. Moreno-Casbas MT, Alonso-Poncelas E, Gómez-García T, Martínez-Madrid MJ, Escobar-Aguilar G. Perception of the quality of care, work environment and sleep characteristics of nurses working in the National Health System. Enfermería Clínica (English Ed [Internet]. 2018;28(4):230–9. Available from: . [CrossRef]
  20. Elayan RM, Ahmad MM. Assessment of the Quality of Nursing Care from Perspectives of Nurses Who Experienced Hospitalization as Patients. J Nurs Care Qual. 2017;32(4):369–74. [CrossRef]
  21. Odunaiya NA, Akinpelu AO, Ogwu S, Aje A. Healthcare professionals’ perception of quality of care of patients with cardiac disease in Nigeria: Implication for clinical guideline, inter-professional education and team work. Malawi Med J. 2019;31(1):31–8. [CrossRef]
  22. Aladeen Alloubani, Laila Akhu-Zaheya, Ibrahim Mubarak Abdelhafiz MA. Leadership styles’ influence on the quality of nursing care. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2018;7(4):1–40. [CrossRef]
  23. Mert Boğa S, Aydin Sayilan A, Kersu Ö, Baydemİr C. Perception of care quality and ethical sensitivity in surgical nurses. Nurs Ethics. 2020;27(3):673–85.
  24. McIntosh N, Burgess JF, Meterko M, Restuccia JD, Alt-White AC, Kaboli P, et al. Impact of provider coordination on nurse and physician perceptions of patient care quality. J Nurs Care Qual. 2014;29(3):269–79. [CrossRef]
  25. Gür E, Ekici D. Determining Factors that influence nurses’ perceptions of quality implementations conducted in hospitals in Turkey. J Nurs Res [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Apr 8];28(3):1–8. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/jnr-twna/Fulltext/2020/06000/Determining_Factors_That_Influence_Nurses_.8.aspx . [CrossRef]
  26. Liu Y, Aungsuroch Y. Factors influencing nurse-assessed quality nursing care: A cross-sectional study in hospitals. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74(4):935–45. [CrossRef]
  27. FDRE. Population Size of Towns by Sex , Region , Zone and Weredas. 2021;
  28. Manuela M, Pereira F, Narcisa M, Ii G, Maria O, Lopes P, et al. Quality of nursing care : instrument development and validation. 2016;69(5):864–70.
  29. Weldetsadik AY, Gishu T, Tekleab AM, Mekonnen Asfaw Y, Girma Legesse T, Demas T. Quality of nursing care and nurses’ working environment in Ethiopia: Nurses’ and physicians’ perception. Int J Africa Nurs Sci [Internet]. 2019;10(July 2018):131–5. Available from: . [CrossRef]
  30. Fernando A, Amaral S. Validation of the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index ( PES-NWI ) for the Portuguese nurse population. 2012;5(3):280–8.
  31. Gedif G, Sisay Y, Alebel A, Belay YA. Level of job satisfaction and associated factors among health care professionals working at University of Gondar Referral Hospital , Northwest Ethiopia : a cross - sectional study. BMC Res Notes [Internet]. 2018;1–7. Available from: . [CrossRef]
  32. Fahim FN, Ahmed E, Elwahab A, El-guindy HA. Nursing staff perception about the quality of health-care system in primary health-care centers in Beni Suef Governorate. 2020;141–6.
  33. Boscart VM, d’Avernas J, Brown P, Sidani S, Davey M, Ploeg J, et al. The associations between staffing hours and quality of care indicators in long-term care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):1–7. [CrossRef]
  34. Nakano Y, Tanioka T, Yokotani T, Ito H, Miyagawa M, Yasuhara Y, et al. Nurses’ perception regarding patient safety climate and quality of health care in general hospitals in Japan. J Nurs Manag. 2021;29(4):749–58. [CrossRef]
  35. Aziz AR, Mansi QH. Assessment Quality of Nursing Care Provided to Neonates with Respiratory Distress Syndrome at Intensive Care Unit in AL- Nasiriyah City Hospitals 2017; [CrossRef]
  36. Tsai, Yafang; Wu, Shih-Wang; Tsai YH. Employee Perceptions Of Service Quality Based On Hospital Quality Improvement Strategy. International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences (IJMESS). ISSN 2304-1366, IJMESS. International Publishers, Jersey. 2018;Vol. 7, Is.
  37. Blegen MA, Goode CJ, Park SH, Vaughn T, Blegen MA. Baccalaureate Education in Nursing and Patient Outcomes. 2013;43(2):89–94. [CrossRef]
  38. Baernholdt M, Jennings BM, Lewis EJ. A pilot study of staff nursese perceptions of factors that influence quality of care in critical access hospitals. J Nurs Care Qual. 2013;28(4):352–9. [CrossRef]
  39. Rn VK. Registered nurses ’ perceptions of factors influencing nursing care quality : A structural equation modeling study. 2019;(January 2018):1–8.
  40. Spence HK, Fida R. Linking Nurses ’ Perceptions of Patient Care Quality to Job Satisfaction. 2015;45(5):276–83.
  41. Aron S. Cornerstone : A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University , Mankato Relationship between Nurses ’ Job Satisfaction and Quality of Healthcare They Deliver. 2015;
  42. Farman A, Kousar R, Hussain M, Waqas A, Gillani SA. Impact of Job Satisfaction on Quality of Care Among Nurses on the Public Hospital of Lahore , Pakistan. 2017;3(6A):511–9.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated