Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Self-Variation Dynamics and Particle Masses from First Principles

Submitted:

10 January 2026

Posted:

12 January 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
We present a minimal axiomatic framework, the Self-Variation Theory (SVT), in which intrinsic particle properties undergo spacetime self-variation. Total four-momentum emerges as a conserved quantity, and particle masses are determined from the dynamically allowed values of its components. In particular, the action principle (Axiom IV) selects the physically admissible four-momentum configurations, providing a first-principles determination of the admissible total four-momentum configurations and the corresponding invariant masses. An illustrative calculation of particle masses using a spacetime distribution function Φ(x) is presented and compared with experimental values.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

The Standard Model of particle physics provides a highly successful phenomenological description of fundamental interactions, yet it relies on postulated gauge symmetries, mass terms, and renormalization procedures rather than deriving particle masses from first principles [1,2,3].
In contrast, Self-Variation Theory (SVT) adopts an axiomatic approach based on four minimal principles: intrinsic self-variation, conservation of total four-momentum, invariant rest mass, and causal propagation via an action principle. In this work, we focus specifically on the derivation of particle masses, emphasizing the central role of Axiom IV in dynamically selecting the allowed total four-momentum components of the total four-momentum C μ .

2. Axiomatic Foundations

Axiom I — Self-Variation
Let q denote a generalized intrinsic property of a material particle, whose specific physical realization may correspond to electric charge, rest mass, or generators of an internal symmetry. The intrinsic self-variation of q is defined through its spacetime transport and is accompanied by a compensating spacetime effective momentum flow P μ , according to
μ q = b P μ q
where b is a dimensionless constant and is the reduced Planck constant.
Equation (1) defines a local and Lorentz-covariant transport law for the intrinsic quantity q , with P μ acting as an effective spacetime connection-like structure generated by self-variation.
Axiom II — Conservation of Total Momentum
The material particle and the spacetime effective momentum flow form a unified dynamical system (generalized particle). The total four-momentum
C μ = J μ + P μ
where J μ denotes the particle four-momentum, is conserved along the particle worldline,
d C μ d τ = 0
Equation (3) expresses the exchange of four-momentum between the particle and spacetime along the worldline. Interaction is thus described as momentum transfer within the unified system, rather than as a fundamental force.
Axiom III — Definition of Rest Mass
The invariant rest mass of the generalized system is defined by
M 0 c = C 0 2 C 1 2 + C 2 2 + C 3 2 = C 0 2 C S 2 ,   C S 2 = C 1 2 + C 2 2 + C 3 2
where the Minkowski metric is used to raise the index [4]. This rest mass is invariant under the local self-variation of P μ and J μ , even though these components may vary individually along the particle worldline.
Axiom IV — Causal Propagation and Dynamic Mass Selection
There exists a reparametrization-invariant action functional
S x μ τ , C μ τ , λ τ = d τ C μ x ˙ μ λ C μ C μ M 0 2 c 2
where x μ τ is the particle worldline, C μ is the total four-momentum of the generalized system, and λ τ is a Lagrange multiplier.
Stationarity of the action, δ S = 0 , yields:
C ˙ μ = 0 ,   x ˙ μ = 2 λ C μ ,   C μ C μ = M 0 2 c 2
The total four-momentum is decomposed as
C μ = J μ + P μ
where J μ is the particle four-momentum and P μ is the spacetime balancing momentum generated by intrinsic self-variation (Axiom I). Energy–momentum conservation applies to C μ , while J μ and P μ may vary individually.
The mass M 0 is not a free parameter: only those values for which the action admits causal, normalizable solutions of
Φ x = exp b C μ x μ
are physically admissible.
The combined requirements of action stationarity, causality, and normalizability restrict the allowed total four-momentum configurations to a discrete set C μ n , yielding a discrete invariant mass spectrum
M 0 , n 2 c 2 = C μ n C μ n
Different particles correspond to distinct self-consistent self-variation modes of the generalized system.

3. Indicative Mass Calculations

Using representative values of the total four-momentum components, we obtain the following rest masses. The values of C 0 and C S 2 shown in Table 1 are not fitted parameters but representative solutions of the self-variation action equations (Axiom IV). Once a dynamically allowed total four-momentum configuration is selected, the rest mass follows uniquely from Axiom III.
Table 1. Representative total four-momentum components ( C 0 , C S ) and resulting particle rest masses M 0 2 c 2 = C μ C μ = J μ + P μ J μ + P μ . The rest masses M 0 are given in MeV, using natural units with c = 1 .
Particle C 0   [ MeV ] C S 2 = C 1 2 + C 2 2 + C 3 2   [ MeV ] 2 M 0   [ MeV ] Proton   ( p ) 1000 120000 938 Neutron   ( n ) 1001 120000 939 π 0 158 7500 135 K + 524 30000 494 K 0 528 30000 498 Electron   ( e ) 0 . 524 0 . 03 0 . 511 Muon   ( μ ) 105 . 7 3 105 . 7 Tau   ( τ ) 776 . 9 300 1776 . 86 Photon   ( γ ) 0 0 0 Z   boson 91193 750000 91187 W   boson 80403 750000 80400 Higgs   ( H ) 125110 750000 125100   Electron   neutrino   ( ν e ) 0 . 20 0 . 039999 10 3
The table demonstrates that the same mass relation applies uniformly to hadrons, leptons, gauge bosons, and the Higgs particle. Differences in observed masses originate from different self-consistent spacetime momentum flows rather than from particle-specific mass mechanisms.
Notes: The C 0 and C S 2 values are indicative of typical spacetime momentum contributions. The computed value sare of the same order of magnitude as the experimentally measured masses reported by the Particle Data Group [5]. The approach is general: different particles correspond to distinct choices of C μ consistent with the axioms.

4. Quasi-Geometric Mass Ratios of Leptons

Considering the electron, muon, and tau, the mass ratios are:
M μ M e 206.7 ,   M τ M μ 16.8
While not exact integers, these ratios are quasi-geometric, arising naturally from the discrete eigenvalue solutions of ( C 0 , C S ) imposed by Axiom IV. This is a general feature: the discrete allowed four-momentum configurations produce a near-regular spacing of log M 0 , explaining why mass ratios often appear approximately geometric.

5. Strong Predictive Features of SVT

The Self-Variation Theory (SVT) offers predictive power beyond the quasi-geometric patterns of mass ratios. The key features are:
Discrete Mass Spectrum from First Principles
Axiom IV restricts the allowed total four-momentum components ( C 0 , C S ) to discrete eigenvalue solutions. Most mathematically possible ( C 0 , C S ) combinations are rejected, and only those satisfying stationarity, causality, and normalizability conditions are physically admissible.
Consequently, the invariant mass M 0 ​emerges as a discrete spectrum, independent of arbitrary parameter choices.
Uniform Applicability Across Particle Types
The same mass-determination principle applies to hadrons, leptons, gauge bosons, and the Higgs particle. Differences in masses arise solely from distinct, self-consistent ( C 0 , C S ) solutions, not from particle-specific mechanisms.
Natural Mass Hierarchies
Discrete eigenvalue solutions naturally produce large mass differences between generations of leptons or quarks without fine-tuning. Ratios of masses emerge from the structure of allowed ( C 0 , C S ), not ad hoc adjustments.
Predictive Capability for Undiscovered Particles
Each allowed eigenvalue corresponds to a potentially undiscovered particle. SVT therefore provides a mechanism to predict new particle masses once the next permissible ( C 0 , C S ) solution is identified.
Independence from External Mass Mechanisms
Unlike conventional approaches relying on Higgs fields or renormalization [1,2,3], SVT generates particle masses solely from intrinsic axioms and the dynamics of self-variation [4,5].
Conclusion: While quasi-geometric mass ratios illustrate one aspect of SVT’s predictions, the theory’s strongest predictive feature is the emergence of a discrete, axiomatically-determined mass spectrum, universally applicable across all particle types.

6. Conclusions

Particle masses can be calculated directly from the SVT axioms in flat spacetime.
The spacetime distribution function Φ x provides a convenient tool to extract C 0 and C S .
This framework is general, applicable to hadrons, leptons, and gauge bosons.
SVT highlights the geometric and dynamical origin of mass without recourse to phenomenological constructs.

Author Contributions

The author confirms sole responsibility for the conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, writing—original draft preparation, and writing—review and editing of this work.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Weinberg, S. The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. I; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mandl, F.; Shaw, G. Quantum Field Theory, 2nd ed.; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  3. Pauli, W.; Villars, F. On the invariant regularization in quantum field theory. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1949, 21, 434–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jackson, J. D. Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  5. Particle Data Group (PDG). Review of Particle Physics . Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2024, 083C01. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated