1. Introduction
The Standard Model of particle physics provides a highly successful phenomenological description of fundamental interactions, yet it relies on postulated gauge symmetries, mass terms, and renormalization procedures rather than deriving particle masses from first principles [
1,
2,
3].
In contrast, Self-Variation Theory (SVT) adopts an axiomatic approach based on four minimal principles: intrinsic self-variation, conservation of total four-momentum, invariant rest mass, and causal propagation via an action principle. In this work, we focus specifically on the derivation of particle masses, emphasizing the central role of Axiom IV in dynamically selecting the allowed total four-momentum components of the total four-momentum .
2. Axiomatic Foundations
Axiom I — Self-Variation
Let
denote a generalized intrinsic property of a material particle, whose specific physical realization may correspond to electric charge, rest mass, or generators of an internal symmetry. The intrinsic self-variation of
is defined through its spacetime transport and is accompanied by a compensating spacetime effective momentum flow
, according to
where
is a dimensionless constant and
is the reduced Planck constant.
Equation (1) defines a local and Lorentz-covariant transport law for the intrinsic quantity , with acting as an effective spacetime connection-like structure generated by self-variation.
Axiom II — Conservation of Total Momentum
The material particle and the spacetime effective momentum flow form a unified dynamical system (generalized particle). The total four-momentum
where
denotes the particle four-momentum, is conserved along the particle worldline,
Equation (3) expresses the exchange of four-momentum between the particle and spacetime along the worldline. Interaction is thus described as momentum transfer within the unified system, rather than as a fundamental force.
Axiom III — Definition of Rest Mass
The invariant rest mass of the generalized system is defined by
where the Minkowski metric is used to raise the index [
4]. This rest mass is invariant under the local self-variation of
and
, even though these components may vary individually along the particle worldline.
Axiom IV — Causal Propagation and Dynamic Mass Selection
There exists a reparametrization-invariant action functional
where is the particle worldline, is the total four-momentum of the generalized system, and is a Lagrange multiplier.
Stationarity of the action,
, yields:
The total four-momentum is decomposed as
where is the particle four-momentum and is the spacetime balancing momentum generated by intrinsic self-variation (Axiom I). Energy–momentum conservation applies to , while and may vary individually.
The mass
is not a free parameter: only those values for which the action admits causal, normalizable solutions of
are physically admissible.
The combined requirements of action stationarity, causality, and normalizability restrict the allowed total four-momentum configurations to a discrete set
, yielding a discrete invariant mass spectrum
Different particles correspond to distinct self-consistent self-variation modes of the generalized system.
3. Indicative Mass Calculations
Using representative values of the total four-momentum components, we obtain the following rest masses. The values of and shown in Table 1 are not fitted parameters but representative solutions of the self-variation action equations (Axiom IV). Once a dynamically allowed total four-momentum configuration is selected, the rest mass follows uniquely from Axiom III.
Table 1. Representative total four-momentum components (,) and resulting particle rest masses . The rest masses are given in MeV, using natural units with .
The table demonstrates that the same mass relation applies uniformly to hadrons, leptons, gauge bosons, and the Higgs particle. Differences in observed masses originate from different self-consistent spacetime momentum flows rather than from particle-specific mass mechanisms.
Notes: The
and
values are indicative of typical spacetime momentum contributions. The computed value sare of the same order of magnitude as the experimentally measured masses reported by the Particle Data Group [
5]. The approach is general: different particles correspond to distinct choices of
consistent with the axioms.
4. Quasi-Geometric Mass Ratios of Leptons
Considering the electron, muon, and tau, the mass ratios are:
While not exact integers, these ratios are quasi-geometric, arising naturally from the discrete eigenvalue solutions of (,) imposed by Axiom IV. This is a general feature: the discrete allowed four-momentum configurations produce a near-regular spacing of , explaining why mass ratios often appear approximately geometric.
5. Strong Predictive Features of SVT
The Self-Variation Theory (SVT) offers predictive power beyond the quasi-geometric patterns of mass ratios. The key features are:
Discrete Mass Spectrum from First Principles
Axiom IV restricts the allowed total four-momentum components (,) to discrete eigenvalue solutions. Most mathematically possible (,) combinations are rejected, and only those satisfying stationarity, causality, and normalizability conditions are physically admissible.
Consequently, the invariant mass emerges as a discrete spectrum, independent of arbitrary parameter choices.
Uniform Applicability Across Particle Types
The same mass-determination principle applies to hadrons, leptons, gauge bosons, and the Higgs particle. Differences in masses arise solely from distinct, self-consistent (,) solutions, not from particle-specific mechanisms.
Natural Mass Hierarchies
Discrete eigenvalue solutions naturally produce large mass differences between generations of leptons or quarks without fine-tuning. Ratios of masses emerge from the structure of allowed (,), not ad hoc adjustments.
Predictive Capability for Undiscovered Particles
Each allowed eigenvalue corresponds to a potentially undiscovered particle. SVT therefore provides a mechanism to predict new particle masses once the next permissible (,) solution is identified.
Independence from External Mass Mechanisms
Unlike conventional approaches relying on Higgs fields or renormalization [
1,
2,
3], SVT generates particle masses solely from intrinsic axioms and the dynamics of self-variation [
4,
5].
Conclusion: While quasi-geometric mass ratios illustrate one aspect of SVT’s predictions, the theory’s strongest predictive feature is the emergence of a discrete, axiomatically-determined mass spectrum, universally applicable across all particle types.
6. Conclusions
Particle masses can be calculated directly from the SVT axioms in flat spacetime.
The spacetime distribution function provides a convenient tool to extract and .
This framework is general, applicable to hadrons, leptons, and gauge bosons.
SVT highlights the geometric and dynamical origin of mass without recourse to phenomenological constructs.
Author Contributions
The author confirms sole responsibility for the conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, writing—original draft preparation, and writing—review and editing of this work.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
- Weinberg, S. The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. I; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Mandl, F.; Shaw, G. Quantum Field Theory, 2nd ed.; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Pauli, W.; Villars, F. On the invariant regularization in quantum field theory. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1949, 21, 434–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackson, J. D. Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Particle Data Group (PDG). Review of Particle Physics
. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2024, 083C01. [Google Scholar]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).