Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Gauge Interactions and the Standard Model from the Axioms of Self-Variation Theory

Submitted:

02 January 2026

Posted:

06 January 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
We present an axiomatic framework in which fundamental interactions emerge as necessary consequences of intrinsic self-variation of particle properties, constrained by energy–momentum conservation and causal propagation. Starting from four axioms, we show that Abelian and non-Abelian gauge structures arise naturally. Electromagnetism, Quantum Electrodynamics (QED), Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD), and the electroweak sector are recovered as effective descriptions of underlying self-variation dynamics. Renormalization, confinement, chiral symmetry breaking, and the Higgs mechanism are reinterpreted as geometric and dynamical consequences of self-variation. The Standard Model is thus an effective local limit rather than a fundamental theory.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Despite its extraordinary empirical success, the Standard Model (SM) rests on postulated gauge symmetries, coupling constants, and fields whose physical origin remains unexplained [1,2,3]. Gauge invariance, renormalization, confinement, and spontaneous symmetry breaking are introduced as structural principles rather than derived consequences [2].
In this work, we adopt an alternative starting point: intrinsic self-variation of particle properties, consistently constrained by energy–momentum conservation and causal propagation. In this framework, interactions are not fundamental forces but manifestations of spacetime momentum flows that compensate intrinsic self-variation.
We demonstrate that, starting from a set of four axioms, the full gauge structure of the Standard Model emerges naturally.

2. Axiomatic Foundations

  • Axiom I — Self-Variation 
Let q denote a generalized intrinsic property of a material particle, whose specific physical realization may correspond to electric charge, rest mass, or generators of an internal symmetry.
The intrinsic self-variation of q is defined through its spacetime transport and is accompanied by a compensating spacetime effective momentum flow P μ , according to
μ q = b P μ q ,
where b is a dimensionless constant and is the reduced Planck constant.
Equation (1) defines a local and Lorentz-covariant transport law for the intrinsic quantity q , with P μ acting as an effective spacetime connection-like structure generated by self-variation.
  • Axiom II — Conservation of Total Momentum 
The material particle and the spacetime effective momentum flow form a unified dynamical system (generalized particle). The total four-momentum
C μ = J μ + P μ
where J μ denotes the particle four-momentum, is conserved along the particle worldline,
d C μ d τ = 0 ,
Equation (3) expresses the exchange of four-momentum between the particle and spacetime along the worldline. Interaction is thus described as momentum transfer within the unified system, rather than as a fundamental force.
  • Axiom III — Definition of Rest Mass 
The invariant rest mass of the generalized system is defined by
M 2 c 2 = C μ C μ ,
where the Minkowski metric is used to raise the index.
This rest mass is invariant under the local self-variation of P μ and J μ , even though these components may vary individually along the particle worldline.
  • Axiom IV — Causal Propagation via Action Principle 
There exists an action functional
S q = L q , μ q , P μ , J μ   d 4 x ,
whose variation with respect to the generalized quantities yields the coupled equations of motion for both the particle and the spacetime momentum flow. This guarantees causal propagation of self-variation through spacetime, while maintaining local Lorentz invariance.

3. Emergence of Abelian Gauge Structure

Defining the spacetime connection
A μ = b P μ .
Equation (1) becomes a covariant transport law for the intrinsic quantity q:
μ q = A μ q .
Consistency of mixed derivatives requires the antisymmetric field strength tensor
F μ ν = μ A ν ν A μ ,
which reproduces Maxwell’s equations and ensures charge conservation [1]. Gauge transformations naturally arise as local redefinitions of the phase of q ,
q e i a x q ,   A μ A μ + μ a x ,
leaving (7) and (8) invariant. Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) emerges as the effective quantum description of this Abelian gauge structure.

4. Renormalization as Self-Variation Dynamics

In conventional QED, renormalization compensates ultraviolet divergences arising from point-like fields.
In the self-variation framework, the intrinsic quantities q are dynamically distributed in spacetime via the effective momentum flow P μ (or equivalently A μ = b P μ ), which prevents singular self-energies. The running of couplings and vacuum polarization arise naturally from the spacetime evolution of q , without invoking virtual particle creation. Thus, renormalization is interpreted as a phenomenological effect of self-variation dynamics, rather than a separate postulate [4].

5. Non-Abelian Generalization and QCD

The intrinsic quantity q is generalized to a vector or matrix in an internal space:
q N ,
A μ = b P μ int .
The corresponding field strength tensor becomes non-Abelian:
F μ ν = μ A ν ν A μ + A μ , A ν ,
reproducing the Yang-Mills structure of QCD [5]. Gauge transformations act as
q U x q ,   A U A μ U 1 + μ U U 1 ,   U x S U N ,
leaving (9)–(11) invariant.
Self-variation requires complete internal momentum balance. Isolated color configurations would generate uncompensated flows and are forbidden, leading naturally to confinement. Stable eigenmodes of the self-variation equations correspond to hadronic states, whose masses are dominated by the spacetime momentum flows.

Confinement

Self-variation requires complete internal momentum balance in the generalized system. Isolated color configurations would generate uncompensated spacetime momentum flows P μ int (or equivalently A μ ) and are therefore forbidden. Confinement thus emerges naturally as a kinematic consequence of the self-variation dynamics: only color-neutral, globally balanced configurations are allowed [6].

6. Hadron Masses and Spectra

Hadronic states correspond to stable self-variation configurations of the generalized system that satisfy global internal momentum balance.
Their masses are determined by the total spacetime momentum energy of the configuration:
m h a d r o n 2 = C μ C μ = J μ + P μ int J μ + P μ   int ,
where J μ is the particle momentum and P μ int is the compensating internal momentum flow. This explains why hadron masses are dominated by interaction energy (spacetime momentum flows) rather than the quark rest masses [6].

7. Chiral Structure and the Electroweak Sector

Time-oriented self-variation of the intrinsic quantity q breaks left–right symmetry at the fundamental level.
Decomposing q into left- and right-handed components,
q L = 1 2 1 γ 5 q and   q R = 1 2 1 + γ 5 q ,
the self-variation dynamics naturally lead to a chiral gauge structure for the electroweak interactions:
q L U 2 L d o u b l e t s ,   q R U 1 Y s i n g l e t s ,
without imposing parity violation by hand [7]. The effective gauge fields A μ couple differently to left- and right-handed components, reproducing the chiral structure observed in the Standard Model [3].

8. Higgs Phenomenon as Vacuum Self-Variation

Mass generation arises from a stable vacuum configuration of self-variation of the intrinsic quantity q . In this state, the compensating spacetime momentum flows P μ int (or equivalently the connection
A μ ) acquire persistent non-zero values, corresponding to gauge boson masses:
m A 2 < P μ int P μ   int > v a c u u m .
This provides a geometric interpretation of the Higgs mechanism, where masses of the W and Z bosons arise naturally from the vacuum self-variation of the generalized system, without introducing an independent scalar field [8].

9. Fermion Generations and Neutrino Mixing

Multiple stable eigenmodes of the self-variation equation for the intrinsic quantity q naturally correspond to the observed three fermion generations. Each eigenmode represents a distinct stable configuration of q and its associated spacetime momentum flow P μ int .
Neutrino mixing arises from the non-orthogonality of these self-variation eigenstates:
< q i q j > 0 ,   i j ,
which leads to flavor oscillations without introducing additional ad hoc parameters [9].

10. The Standard Model as an Effective Theory

All structural elements of the Standard Model — gauge symmetries, confinement, chiral asymmetry, mass generation, fermion generations, and running couplings — emerge naturally as low-energy manifestations of the self-variation dynamics of the intrinsic quantity q and its associated spacetime momentum flows P μ int .
In this framework:
Gauge fields
A μ = b P μ int and their non-Abelian field strengths F μ ν arise as effective connections and curvatures.
Chiral asymmetry emerges from time-oriented self-variation.
Gauge boson masses correspond to persistent vacuum momentum flows, giving a geometric Higgs mechanism.
Fermion generations and neutrino mixing correspond to stable eigenmodes of self-variation.
Therefore, the Standard Model is interpreted as an effective, local approximation of the underlying self-variation dynamics, rather than a fundamental theory.

11. Conclusions

This framework provides an axiomatic foundation from which all Standard Model interactions and structures emerge naturally:
Interactions are momentum exchanges compensating intrinsic self-variation, not fundamental forces.
Gauge symmetries, confinement, and chiral structure are necessary consequences of self-variation dynamics.
Mass generation and Higgs phenomena are geometric and dynamical, arising from persistent vacuum self-variation.
Fermion generations and mixing patterns follow from multiple stable eigenmodes.
By unifying these elements, the approach shows that the Standard Model is a low-energy effective theory, fully consistent with Lorentz covariance, causality, and internal momentum conservation, emerging from four axioms rather than being postulated independently.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jackson, J.D. Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  2. Weinberg, S. The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. I; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mandl, F.; Shaw, G. Quantum Field Theory, 2nd ed.; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  4. Pauli, W.; Villars, F. On the Invariant Regularization in Quantum Field Theory. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1949, 21, 434–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gross, D.J.; Wilczek, F. Ultraviolet Behavior of Non-Abelian Gauge Theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1973, 30, 1343–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Creutz, M. Quarks, Gluons and Lattices; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  7. Glashow, S.L. Theoretical Aspects of Weak Interactions. Nucl. Phys. 1961, 22, 579–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Higgs, P.W. Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1964, 13, 508–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pontecorvo, B. Neutrino Experiments and the Problem of Conservation of Leptonic Charge. Sov. Phys. JETP 1968, 26, 984–988. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated