Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

The Spacetime Curls and the Extended Maxwell Equations for Electromagnetism and Weak Gravity

Submitted:

20 December 2025

Posted:

22 December 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
We innovate the Lorentz covariant spacetime curls for the complex Minkowski space, from which the extended Maxwell equations are theoretically derived rigorously. The extended Maxwell equations, which actually arise from the features of the spacetime characterized by the Lorentz transformation, are found to be capable of describing the fields of electromagnetism and weak gravity as distinct solutions in the unified way. The properties of gravitational and electromagnetic fields, such as the interaction force, the energy flux density and the Lagrangian, are obtained homogeneously. The nature that the electric charges with the same sign repel each other and the objects with masses always attract each other, which was previously considered to be the bounty of nature, can now be theoretically derived in this mechanic. Besides, both the electromagnetism and the gravity unfold their mirror descriptions. A unified charge dimension, which will facilitate to the homogeneous description of the two interactions, is proposed. The mechanic is partially examined in a thought experiment.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

As is known, in analogy [1,2,3,4,5] to electromagnetism, the theory of gravitoelectromagnetic(GEM) [6,7,8,9] fields and Maxwell-like equations were introduced for weak gravity in General Relativity [1,5,6]. Subsequently some relevant effects[10,11,12,13,14,15,16] were studied and partially verified by experiments[17,18]. Recently even the strong gravity was described by nonlinear Maxwell equations [19,20]. Apparently, the Maxwell equation plays a crucial way for electromagnetism and gravity, especially for weak field in flat space. The Maxwell equation can be theoretically derived mainly in two ways, the Lagrangian mechanic and differential forms, as well as in other ways [21,22]. Traditionally, the Maxwell equation for electromagnetism[23,24] and Maxwell-like equation for weak gravity [1,2] are theoretically obtained separatively.
In this paper we develop the mathematical approach, which provides the Lorentz covariant linearized spacetime curls for spacetime variables and leads to the theoretical derivation of the extended Maxwell equations with branch parameters. The solutions of these equations are naturally divided by the branch parameters into two distinct parts, which are proved to be the electromagnetism and the gravity. As a result the nature of charges, mirror systems and the way to homogeneously describe the two interactions are obtained, which provide an alternative method to describe the relationship between the nature of spacetime and the two interactions. Noteably, all the gravity in this paper mainly refers to the weak gravity. Below are some notations and contents.

1.1. General Notations

All the vector a C 3 + 1 here are denoted by ( a , a 4 ) . The metric use g μ ν = g μ ν = δ ν μ ( μ , ν = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) as in complex Minkowski space(spacetime). The square of the vector a is defined as a 2 : = a · a = a · a + a 4 2 .

1.2. Methods—The Mathematical Approach for the Spacetime

In Section 2 we put forth a more general definition called spacetime vector than the Lorentz vector to include some useful 4-component complex physical quantities, such as complex energy flux density and the vector ( E + i B , 0 ) [25]. We innovate the mathematical operations called spacetime products and spacetime curls for the spacetime vectors, which resemble wedge products and exterior differentiations respectively, but are more pertinent to physical quantities obeying Lorentz transformation. Our mathematical approach is actually a geometry in complex domain describing the Special Relativity, which could bring us the new description in related fields. The work in this paper is one of its applications. Although we obtain many theorems and formulas in this mathematical approach, which can be rigorously proved, we briefly present part of the theorems and formulas related to this paper.

1.3. Results—The Extended Maxwell Equations and the Unified Modal

In Section 3, using the mathematical approach we developed as stated above, we derive the extended Maxwell equations. The subsequent formulas of interaction force and energy flux are derived. Some general definitions and the unified charge system are present in this section. This framework is temporarily called the unified modal in this paper.

1.4. Discussion—The Interpretation and Verification of the Unified Modal

In Section 4, we give the interpretation of the result of the unified modal, where we find the mirror system of Maxwell equation and the derivation of the nature of charges. A thought experiment is given to verify the unified modal.

2. Methods–The Mathematical Approach for the Spacetime

In this section we give the definition of spacetime vector, derive the mathematical operations, spacetime products and spacetime curls, and study their properties.

2.1. The Definition of Spacetime Vector

Definition 1. 
If the square of the vector a C 3 + 1 is Lorentz invariant, the vector is defined asspacetime vector .
The set of all spacetime vectors is denoted by S 3 + 1 . One can verify that, in addition to all Lorentz vectors, S 3 + 1 contains also the vector like ( E + i B , 0 ) and energy flux density etc. In fact, all the 4-component physical quantities in this paper are spacetime vectors.

2.2. The Spacetime Products

2.2.1. The Definition of Spacetime Products

Definition 2. 
The spacetime product X is defined as the operation of mapping any two spacetime vectors a and b to another spacetime vector c, denoted by c : = a X b , where a , b , c S 3 + 1 and c 2 = a 2 b 2 .

2.2.2. The Solutions of Spacetime Products

One can prove that there are eight independent spacetime products as below:
a X δ α β b = δ a × b + α a b 4 + β a 4 b a 4 b 4 α β a · b
where δ = ± 1 , α = ± 1 , β = ± 1 are called branch parameters in this paper.

2.2.3. The Reverse Operation of Spacetime Products

If there exists a spacetime product X δ α β r corresponding to X δ α β for any two spacetime vectors a and b, satisfying: a X δ α β r ( a X δ α β b ) = a 2 b , then X δ α β r is called the reverse operation of X δ α β . One can prove the reverse operation has the properties below:
  • The basic property of the reverse operation: X δ α β r = X δ ( α β ) β .
  • The reciprocity of the reverse operation: X δ α β r r = X δ α β

2.2.4. The Representation Matrices of the Spacetime Products

There exists four matrices X μ δ α β ( μ = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) corresponding to each X δ α β , satisfying(dropping δ α β for simplicity): a μ X μ b = a X b , for any two spacetime vectors a and b, where X μ is called the representation matrix of X . One can derive the properties of representation matrices below:
  • Every matrix X μ ( μ = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) is real orthogonal.
  • X μ 1 are representation matrices of X r .
  • Representation matrices satisfy: X μ 1 X ν = X ν 1 X μ .
  • If a μ a μ = 1 then a μ X μ is orthogonal, and ( a μ X μ ) 1 = a μ X μ 1 .
To obtain the specific form of the representation matrices, some specific matrices are defined below:
Ω 1 = 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Ω 2 = 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Ω 3 = 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Ω 4 = I
Θ 1 = 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Θ 2 = 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Θ 3 = 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Θ 4 = I
I = d i a g ( 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 )
One can prove:
X μ 111 = Ω μ X μ 1 11 = Ω μ 1 X μ 111 = Θ μ X μ 1 11 = Θ μ 1 X μ δ α 1 = I X μ δ α 1

2.3. The Spacetime Curls

The operation X δ α β is defined as spacetime derivative, where as vector operator operates on spacetime function ϕ in the form of Eq. (1). X δ α β would be mathematically 4-dimensional curl, if for any ϕ it satisfies
· X δ α β ϕ = 0 .
However, No X δ α β satisfies the equation above strictly, except that X δ 1 β satisfies Eq. (3) conditionally. We denote the four of the eight X δ α β by R δ β : = X δ 1 β , which can be extended to be curls as follows.

2.3.1. The Definition of Spacetime Curls

Definition 3. 
The operation R δ β is defined asthe spacetime curl, if it operates on the function ϕ in the following form:
R δ β ϕ : = δ × ϕ + ϕ 4 + β 4 ϕ 4 ϕ 4 β · ϕ
where R δ β may be called the core of the spacetime curl. Obviously there are four spacetime curls. The equation R δ β ϕ = ψ is called spacetime curl equation, which can be expressed in matrices form as μ R μ δ β ϕ = ψ where
R μ δ β : = X μ δ 1 β
is the representation matrix of R δ β , and X μ δ 1 β can be obtained from Eq. (2). Below are several useful formulas:
R δ β r = X δ β β
· R δ β ϕ = ϕ 4
R δ β ( R δ β r ϕ ) = R δ β r ( R δ β ϕ ) = ϕ

2.3.2. The Lorentz Covariance of the Spacetime Curl Equation

Considering the frame of reference x y z moves at speed v relative to that of x y z , the Lorentz transformation matrix L will be [23,24]
L = 1 + κ u 1 2 κ u 1 u 2 κ u 1 u 3 i ξ u 1 κ u 2 u 1 1 + κ u 2 2 κ u 2 u 3 i ξ u 2 κ u 3 u 1 κ u 3 u 2 1 + κ u 3 2 i ξ u 3 i ξ u 1 i ξ u 2 i ξ u 3 γ
where u v / v , κ γ 1 and ξ κ ( γ + 1 ) .
Theorem 1. 
Provided the following spacetime curl equation is Lorentz covariant
μ R μ δ β ϕ = ψ
If ψ is Lorentz vector and the Lorentz transformation matrix is Eq. (9), then the transformation matrix of ϕ is:
T = 0 T 0 0 0 0 0 1
where the upper left 3 × 3 sub-matrix T is
T = U 0 + i δ β V 0
where
U 0 = γ I κ u u V 0 = ξ 0 u 3 u 2 u 3 0 u 1 u 2 u 1 0
where u u is a dyadic matrix in the first line of the equation above.
Corollary 1. 
For the ϕ in the theorem 1, ϕ 4 and ϕ · ϕ are both Lorentz scalars.
Definition 4. 
The ϕ as in the theorem 1, is defined asLorentz complex vector, or simplycomplex vector .

3. Results—The Extended Maxwell Equations and the Unified Modal

We will try using the four spacetime curl equations to derive the extended Maxwell equations by virtual of the approach above.

3.1. Definitions of the Unified Modal

For theoretical integration and rigour, it is necessary to give some general definitions as below. The physical quantities that cause two objects across a distance to interact with each other are calledcharges, and the physical quantities that transmit such interaction across the space are calledfields. Apparently, the mass for gravitation is now called charge or gravitational charge as stated above. Since both the electric charges and gravitational charges can produce the inverse-square forces, they should share the same dimension and unit. Hereafter the physical quantities such as charges, currents, fields and potentials etc as well as their formulas are respectively redefined to be in the same dimension and unit for electromagnetism and gravity, and we might temporarily call such system unified charge system or unified charge dimension. If not specified or if preposited by the word unified, these quantities refer to being of one of electromagnetism or gravity. For example, the current density denoted by Lorentz vectors ( J , i c ρ ) can be either electric current density or gravitational current density. The specific dimension and unit of some physical quantities will be given later in this section.
For compatibility with General Relativity, we can show that the equation h ¯ μ ν = 16 π G T μ ν / c 4 [1,5,6] in weak gravity and from slowly moving source can reduce to Maxwell-like equation, which will correspond to the extended Maxwell equations of gravity here.
After the preparation above, we would like to call our framework the unified modal.

3.2. The Derivation of the Extended Maxwell Equations

Supposing the complex vector Ψ is the field stimulated by source current density J , based on Theorem 1, we can construct the following covariant spacetime curl equation
i R δ β Ψ = J / c
where δ = ± 1 , β = ± 1 , J = ( J , i c ρ ) is a vector current density, Ψ is a complex vector field, c is the speed of light, i is arranged for convenience. According to Corollary 1, Ψ 4 is Lorentz invariant. Taking the 4-divergence on both sides of (14), using the property of current conservation μ J μ = 0 , by virtue of Eq. (7) we get
Ψ 4 = 0
which is considered to be the additive condition to Eq. (14). Suppose the field Ψ can be expressed in terms of potential vector A = ( A , i φ / c ) [23,24] as
Ψ = i R δ β r A
Substituting Ψ in Eq. (16) into (14) and using Eq. (8), we get
A = J / c
Eq. (17) is applicable to weak gravity [2] and electromagnetism [23], therefore the supposition (16) is feasible. Applying the Lorentz condition μ A μ = 0 to Eq. (16), we get Ψ 4 = 0 , which fulfils the additive condition (15). Thus Ψ can be rewritten as
Ψ = E + i B 0
Rewrite Eq. (14) using Ψ = ( Ψ , 0 ) and in the form of matrices respectively as
i δ × Ψ β Ψ c t = J / c β · Ψ = ρ
i μ R μ δ β Ψ = J / c
where the matrices R μ δ β can be obtained from Eq. (5) and Eq. (2). The Eq. (14),(19) and (20) are the extended Maxwell equations in the complex form. Substituting Ψ in Eq. (18) into (14) and using Eq. (4), we obtain the extended Maxwell equations in real form:
δ × E + β B c t = 0 δ × B β E c t = J / c β · B = 0 β · E = ρ
where δ = ± 1 , β = ± 1 are branch parameters.
According to Corollary 1, we have two commonly used Lorentz scalars in complex form as Ψ · Ψ = E 2 B 2 + 2 i E · B . For vacuum state J = 0 , with R δ β r operating on Eq. (14) and by virtual of Eq. (8) one can easily obtain the Helmholtz equation Ψ = 0 , which also demonstrates the simplicity that the spcetime curl brings to us.

3.3. The Energy Flux Density

The energy flux density, in analogy to that in Electrodynamics [23], in the unified modal is defined as
S : = c ( Ψ * R δ β Ψ ) / ( 2 i )
which is the expansion of the Poynting vector. Substituting Eq. (18) into the equation above, one gets
S = c δ E × B i β ( E 2 + B 2 ) / 2
By virtue of Eq. (21) we get μ S μ = E · J . With the help of Eq. (26), one will get μ S μ = f · v , which means the energy increment of the field and its work done to the charge comply with the law of energy conservation.

3.4. The Interaction Force and the Unified Charge Unit

We can prove that the force density, in analogy to that in Electrodynamics [24], can be defined as
f : = ζ ( J R δ β Ψ + J R δ β Ψ * ) / ( 2 i c )
where the pending coefficient ζ = ± 1 is set to arrange the direction of J , Ψ and f in consistence. Substituting Eq. (18) into Eq. (24) we get
f = ζ β ρ E + δ J × B / c i β E · J / c
Since E can produce f = ζ β ρ E , when ρ > 0 , f and E should be in the same direction, so ζ β = 1 . For ζ = ± 1 , β = ± 1 , we get ζ = β , and substitute it into Eq. (25), then obtain the force density:
f = ρ E + δ β J × B / c i E · J / c
Taking integral of the forth of Eq. (21) and the ρ E item of Eq. (26), we get the force that the charge Q 1 exerts on Q 2 in stationary state as:
F 12 = β Q 1 Q 2 r 2 e 12
The Eq. (27) is the coulomb-like force in the unified modal with branch parameter β = ± 1 . The Eq. (27) is the universal formula to calculate the interaction forces of the four systems in the unified modal. The unit of the unified charge is N e w t o n 1 / 2 · m e t e r in the unified charge system, which means that the magnitude of the interaction force between the two charges which are positioned one meter apart and are with the amount of one unit is one Newton. While the units of field E and potential A are N e w t o n 1 / 2 / m e t e r and N e w t o n 1 / 2 respectively. By the similar derivation,we get that the interaction between two current elements [16] can be calculated as follows
d F 12 = β I 1 I 2 d l 2 × ( d l 1 × e 12 ) c 2 r 2

3.5. The Lagrangian

The Lagrangian of the system is L = ( Ψ T Ψ ) / 2 + A · J / c . Substituting Eq.(16) into it and using Eq. (6), we get
L = 1 2 [ ν X ν δ β β A ] T μ X μ δ β β A + A · J / c

4. Discussion—The Interpretation and Verification of the Unified Modal

In Section 3 we develop the extended Maxwell equations and the formulas of interaction force etc, from which we spot the contained branch parameters δ and β . In fact the branch parameters are inherited from the spacetime curls, which reflect the features of the spacetime. We will discuss the physical meaning of each of the branch parameters below and identify the electromagnetism and the gravity from the unified modal .

4.1. The System Is of Electromagnetism When δ = 1 , β = 1

Substituting δ = 1 , β = 1 into Eq. (21),(20) and (29), apparently, we get the traditional Maxwell equation. The traditional Maxwell equation in complex form and the Lagrangian are below respectively
i μ Ω μ Ψ = J / c
L = 1 2 ( ν Ω ν 1 A ) T μ Ω μ 1 A + A · J / c
All other formulas we could get are in consistence with the traditional theory of electromagnetism [24]. Note that in the unified charge system, the E and B in Eq. (18) and (21) etc are set in the same dimension and unit.

4.2. The Physical Meaning of δ = ± 1 Is About Mirror Systems

Observing Eq. (21), (23) and (26),one can find that δ always appears in the term with cross product,which means that the right-hand system with δ = 1 and the left-hand system with δ = 1 are equivalent. Eq. (27) (28) indicate that the interaction is independent of δ . Thus δ = ± 1 may describe the physically indistinguishable mirror systems.

4.3. The Physical Meaning of β = ± 1 Is About the Nature of Charge

From Eq. (27) (28),we acquire that β = 1 means the charges with the same sign repel each other and the charges with opposite sign attract each other, while β = 1 means the charges with the same sign attract each other and the charges with the opposite sign repel each other, which can be called the nature of charge. Thus we recognize that β = 1 represents the electromagnetism and β = 1 represents the gravitation in which the mass is positive charge. Of course, compared to the situation for General Relativity, the gravitation here is weak and ready for Special Relativity.
Now we have identified the electromagnetism and the gravity in the unified modal in terms of branch parameters in the formulas, which are the reflection of the features of the spacetime characterized by the Special Relativity.

4.4. The Transfer From the Traditional Unit to the Unified Charge System

The interaction of electromagnetism and gravity can be calculated in the unified formulas (27) (28), the unified charge and currents of which can be transferred from the traditional ones respectively. Specificly the current density J = ( J , i c ρ ) in the unified charge system can be transferred from the traditional current density J t = ( J t , i c ρ t ) as follows:
J = C t J t
where for electromagnetism C t = 1 / 4 π ϵ 0 , J t is traditional electrical current density; for gravity C t = G , J t is the mass current density where the mass is rest mass and is Lorentz scalar. The transformation formulas for charges, fields and potentials can be easily obtained in analogy to Eq. (31).

4.5. The Experimental Verification of the Unified Modal

Now we formulate an experiment to verify the unified modal. Provided that in the outer space there are two rest objects m 1 and m 2 with electric charge q 1 and q 2 of the same sign, satisfying q 1 q 2 / ( 4 π ϵ 0 ) = G m 1 m 2 , which will yield two force cancelation in Eq. (27). One will observe the vanishing interaction of them in the frame resting on the objects. On the principle of relativity one shall also see the vanishing interaction, including magnetism-like force, in the moving frame. We can easily show the unified modal meet the above description from Eq. (21) (27) (28). On the contrary if the gravity do not obey the unified modal, It would be hard to satisfy the principle of relativity. Therefore the unified modal for gravity and electromagnetism is verified.

5. Conclusions

We construct the mathematical approach by introducing spacetime vectors, spacetime products and spacetime curls which originate from the physical spacetime nature. With the Lorentz condition the equations of spacetime curls are just equivalent to the extended Maxwell equations which are found to describe fields of the classical electromagnetism and the weak gravitation and their mirror systems.
Based on the extended Maxwell equations we preliminarily establish the unified modal of the two kinds of interaction in classical scope, in which we give the formulas of interaction force, energy flux density and the Lagrangian. In the unified modal the nature of charges is theoretically derived, which implies the nature of charges arises from the nature of spacetime. Moreover, it is obtained that the Maxwell equation has its mirror partner and the gravity unfolds its gravitomagnetic force [16]. The unified charge system is proposed to facilitate the homogeneous description of electromagnetism and gravity in the formulas.
Notably, the unified modal is derived naturally and rigorously from the mere feature of physical spacetime with simple calculus, where we have given no extra hypothesis but rather some definitions and mathematical constructions in the spacetime. The the unified modal is verified by a formulated thought experiment.
Undeniably, there is still some work to be done to complete the modal, such as some specific applications and the interplay between electromagnetism and weak gravity, which would be attainable on basis of our framework. The unified modal is derived and applicable in the classical scope for electromagnetism and on the condition of weak gravity in flat space. By virtual of our perspectives and mathematical approach, to expand the scope in the unified modal to that of strong fields and quantization would probably be an interesting subject.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Data Availability Statement

All data are contained in this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Thorne, K.S.; Misner, C.W.; Wheeler, J.A. Gravitation; Freeman: New York, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ciufolini, I.; Wheeler, J.A. Gravitation and Inertia; Princeton University Press, 1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Weinberg, S. Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity; Wiley: New York, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  4. Carlos Barceló, S.L.; Visser, M. Analogue Gravity. Living Rev. Relativity 2005, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Costa, L.F.O.; Herdeiro, C.A.R. Gravitoelectromagnetic analogy based on tidal tensors. Phys. Rev. D 2008, 78, 024021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mashhoon, B. Gravitoelectromagnetism. In Reference Frames and Gravitomagnetism; Proceedings of the XXIII Spanish Relativity Meeting, 2001; pp. 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bini, D.; Carini, P.; Jantzen, R.T.; Wilkins, D. Thomas precession in post-Newtonian gravitoelectromagnetism. Phys. Rev. D 1994, 49, 2820–2827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Nouri-Zonoz, M. Gravitoelectromagnetic approach to the gravitational Faraday rotation in stationary spacetimes. Phys. Rev. D 1999, 60, 024013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bailey, Q.G. Lorentz-violating gravitoelectromagnetism. Phys. Rev. D 2010, 82, 065012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ruggiero, M.L. Gravitomagnetic field of rotating rings. Astrophysics and Space Science 2016, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kopeikin, S.; Mashhoon, B. Gravitomagnetic effects in the propagation of electromagnetic waves in variable gravitational fields of arbitrary-moving and spinning bodies. Phys. Rev. D 2002, 65, 064025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mashhoon, B. On the gravitational analogue of Larmor’s theorem. Phys. Lett. A 1993, 173, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lense, J.; Thirring, H. Phys. Z. 1918, 19, 156.
  14. Tajmar, M.; Assis, A. Gravitational induction with Weber’s force. Canadian Journal of Physics 2015, 93, 1571–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wald, R. Gravitational Spin Interaction. Phys. Rev. D 1972, 6, 406–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nordtvedt, K. Existence of the gravitomagnetic interaction. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 1988, 27, 1395–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ciufolini, I.; Pavlis, E.C. A confirmation of the general relativistic prediction of the Lense–Thirring effect. Nature 2004, 431, 958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Everitt, C.W.F.; DeBra, D.B.; et al. Gravity Probe B: Final Results of a Space Experiment to Test General Relativity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106, 221101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Boyeneni, S.; Wu, J.; Most, E.R. Unveiling the Electrodynamic Nature of Spacetime Collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2025, 135, 101401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Olivares, H.; Peshkov, I.M.; Most, E.R.; Guercilena, F.M.; Papenfort, L.J. New first-order formulation of the Einstein equations exploiting analogies with electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 105, 124038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. López, G.V. On Maxwell Equations for Gravitational Field. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics 2018, 6, 932–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sattinger, D.H. On the universality of Maxwell’s equations. Monatsh Math 2018, 186, 503–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Landau, L.D.; Lifshitz, E.M. The Classical Theory of Fields; BH-Elsevier, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  24. Jackson, J.D. Classical Eectrodynamics, third ed.; Wiley, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  25. Su, B. The spinor equation for the electromagnetic field. arXiv 2000, arXiv:quant-ph/0011061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated