1. Introduction
As is known, in analogy [
1,
2,
3,
4,
5] to electromagnetism, the theory of gravitoelectromagnetic(GEM) [
6,
7,
8,
9] fields and Maxwell-like equations were introduced for weak gravity in General Relativity [
1,
5,
6]. Subsequently some relevant effects[
10,
11,
12,
13,
14,
15,
16] were studied and partially verified by experiments[
17,
18]. Recently even the strong gravity was described by nonlinear Maxwell equations [
19,
20]. Apparently, the Maxwell equation plays a crucial way for electromagnetism and gravity, especially for weak field in flat space. The Maxwell equation can be theoretically derived mainly in two ways, the Lagrangian mechanic and differential forms, as well as in other ways [
21,
22]. Traditionally, the Maxwell equation for electromagnetism[
23,
24] and Maxwell-like equation for weak gravity [
1,
2] are theoretically obtained separatively.
In this paper we develop the mathematical approach, which provides the Lorentz covariant linearized spacetime curls for spacetime variables and leads to the theoretical derivation of the extended Maxwell equations with branch parameters. The solutions of these equations are naturally divided by the branch parameters into two distinct parts, which are proved to be the electromagnetism and the gravity. As a result the nature of charges, mirror systems and the way to homogeneously describe the two interactions are obtained, which provide an alternative method to describe the relationship between the nature of spacetime and the two interactions. Noteably, all the gravity in this paper mainly refers to the weak gravity. Below are some notations and contents.
1.1. General Notations
All the vector here are denoted by . The metric use as in complex Minkowski space(spacetime). The square of the vector a is defined as .
1.2. Methods—The Mathematical Approach for the Spacetime
In
Section 2 we put forth a more general definition called spacetime vector than the Lorentz vector to include some useful 4-component complex physical quantities, such as complex energy flux density and the vector
[
25]. We innovate the mathematical operations called spacetime products and spacetime curls for the spacetime vectors, which resemble wedge products and exterior differentiations respectively, but are more pertinent to physical quantities obeying Lorentz transformation. Our mathematical approach is actually a geometry in complex domain describing the Special Relativity, which could bring us the new description in related fields. The work in this paper is one of its applications. Although we obtain many theorems and formulas in this mathematical approach, which can be rigorously proved, we briefly present part of the theorems and formulas related to this paper.
1.3. Results—The Extended Maxwell Equations and the Unified Modal
In
Section 3, using the mathematical approach we developed as stated above, we derive the extended Maxwell equations. The subsequent formulas of interaction force and energy flux are derived. Some general definitions and the unified charge system are present in this section. This framework is temporarily called the
unified modal in this paper.
1.4. Discussion—The Interpretation and Verification of the Unified Modal
In
Section 4, we give the interpretation of the result of the unified modal, where we find the mirror system of Maxwell equation and the derivation of the nature of charges. A thought experiment is given to verify the unified modal.
2. Methods–The Mathematical Approach for the Spacetime
In this section we give the definition of spacetime vector, derive the mathematical operations, spacetime products and spacetime curls, and study their properties.
2.1. The Definition of Spacetime Vector
Definition 1.
If the square of the vector is Lorentz invariant, the vector is defined asspacetime vector
.
The set of all spacetime vectors is denoted by . One can verify that, in addition to all Lorentz vectors, contains also the vector like and energy flux density etc. In fact, all the 4-component physical quantities in this paper are spacetime vectors.
2.2. The Spacetime Products
2.2.1. The Definition of Spacetime Products
Definition 2.
The spacetime product is defined as the operation of mapping any two spacetime vectors a and b to another spacetime vector c, denoted by , where and .
2.2.2. The Solutions of Spacetime Products
One can prove that there are eight independent spacetime products as below:
where
are called
branch parameters in this paper.
2.2.3. The Reverse Operation of Spacetime Products
If there exists a spacetime product corresponding to for any two spacetime vectors a and b, satisfying: , then is called the reverse operation of . One can prove the reverse operation has the properties below:
2.2.4. The Representation Matrices of the Spacetime Products
There exists four matrices corresponding to each , satisfying(dropping for simplicity): , for any two spacetime vectors a and b, where is called the representation matrix of . One can derive the properties of representation matrices below:
Every matrix is real orthogonal.
are representation matrices of .
Representation matrices satisfy: .
If then is orthogonal, and .
To obtain the specific form of the representation matrices, some specific matrices are defined below:
2.3. The Spacetime Curls
The operation
is defined as
spacetime derivative, where
∂ as vector operator operates on spacetime function
in the form of Eq. (
1).
would be mathematically 4-dimensional curl, if for any
it satisfies
However, No
satisfies the equation above strictly, except that
satisfies Eq. (
3) conditionally. We denote the four of the eight
by
, which can be extended to be curls as follows.
2.3.1. The Definition of Spacetime Curls
Definition 3.
The operation is defined asthe spacetime curl, if it operates on the function ϕ in the following form:
where
may be called
the core of the spacetime curl. Obviously there are four spacetime curls. The equation
is called
spacetime curl equation, which can be expressed in matrices form as
where
is the representation matrix of
, and
can be obtained from Eq. (
2). Below are several useful formulas:
2.3.2. The Lorentz Covariance of the Spacetime Curl Equation
Considering the frame of reference
moves at speed
relative to that of
, the Lorentz transformation matrix
will be [
23,
24]
where
,
and
.
Theorem 1.
Provided the following spacetime curl equation is Lorentz covariant
If ψ is Lorentz vector and the Lorentz transformation matrix is Eq. (9), then the transformation matrix of ϕ is:
where the upper left sub-matrix is
where is a dyadic matrix in the first line of the equation above.
Corollary 1.
For the ϕ in the theorem 1, and are both Lorentz scalars.
Definition 4.
The ϕ as in the theorem 1, is defined asLorentz complex vector, or simplycomplex vector
.
3. Results—The Extended Maxwell Equations and the Unified Modal
We will try using the four spacetime curl equations to derive the extended Maxwell equations by virtual of the approach above.
3.1. Definitions of the Unified Modal
For theoretical integration and rigour, it is necessary to give some general definitions as below. The physical quantities that cause two objects across a distance to interact with each other are calledcharges, and the physical quantities that transmit such interaction across the space are calledfields. Apparently, the mass for gravitation is now called charge or gravitational charge as stated above. Since both the electric charges and gravitational charges can produce the inverse-square forces, they should share the same dimension and unit. Hereafter the physical quantities such as charges, currents, fields and potentials etc as well as their formulas are respectively redefined to be in the same dimension and unit for electromagnetism and gravity, and we might temporarily call such system unified charge system or unified charge dimension. If not specified or if preposited by the word unified, these quantities refer to being of one of electromagnetism or gravity. For example, the current density denoted by Lorentz vectors can be either electric current density or gravitational current density. The specific dimension and unit of some physical quantities will be given later in this section.
For compatibility with General Relativity, we can show that the equation
[
1,
5,
6] in weak gravity and from slowly moving source can reduce to Maxwell-like equation, which will correspond to the extended Maxwell equations of gravity here.
After the preparation above, we would like to call our framework the unified modal.
3.2. The Derivation of the Extended Maxwell Equations
Supposing the complex vector
is the field stimulated by source current density
, based on Theorem 1, we can construct the following covariant spacetime curl equation
where
,
is a vector current density,
is a
complex vector field,
c is the speed of light,
is arranged for convenience. According to Corollary 1,
is Lorentz invariant. Taking the 4-divergence on both sides of (
14), using the property of current conservation
, by virtue of Eq. (
7) we get
which is considered to be
the additive condition to Eq. (
14). Suppose the field
can be expressed in terms of potential vector
[
23,
24] as
Substituting
in Eq. (
16) into (
14) and using Eq. (
8), we get
Eq. (
17) is applicable to weak gravity [
2] and electromagnetism [
23], therefore the supposition (
16) is feasible. Applying the Lorentz condition
to Eq. (
16), we get
, which fulfils the additive condition (
15). Thus
can be rewritten as
Rewrite Eq. (
14) using
and in the form of matrices respectively as
where the matrices
can be obtained from Eq. (
5) and Eq. (
2). The Eq. (
14),(
19) and (
20) are
the extended Maxwell equations in the complex form. Substituting
in Eq. (
18) into (
14) and using Eq. (
4), we obtain
the extended Maxwell equations in real form:
where
are branch parameters.
According to Corollary 1, we have two commonly used Lorentz scalars in complex form as
. For vacuum state
, with
operating on Eq. (
14) and by virtual of Eq. (
8) one can easily obtain the Helmholtz equation
, which also demonstrates the simplicity that the spcetime curl brings to us.
3.3. The Energy Flux Density
The energy flux density, in analogy to that in Electrodynamics [
23], in the unified modal is defined as
which is the expansion of the Poynting vector. Substituting Eq. (
18) into the equation above, one gets
By virtue of Eq. (
21) we get
. With the help of Eq. (
26), one will get
, which means the energy increment of the field and its work done to the charge comply with the law of energy conservation.
3.4. The Interaction Force and the Unified Charge Unit
We can prove that the force density, in analogy to that in Electrodynamics [
24], can be defined as
where the pending coefficient
is set to arrange the direction of
,
and
in consistence. Substituting Eq. (
18) into Eq. (
24) we get
Since
can produce
, when
,
and
should be in the same direction, so
. For
, we get
, and substitute it into Eq. (
25), then obtain the force density:
Taking integral of the forth of Eq. (
21) and the
item of Eq. (
26), we get the force that the charge
exerts on
in stationary state as:
The Eq. (
27) is the coulomb-like force in the unified modal with branch parameter
. The Eq. (
27) is the universal formula to calculate the interaction forces of the four systems in the unified modal. The unit of the unified charge is
in the unified charge system, which means that
the magnitude of the interaction force between the two charges which are positioned one meter apart and are with the amount of one unit is one Newton. While the units of field
and potential
are
and
respectively. By the similar derivation,we get that the interaction between two current elements [
16] can be calculated as follows
3.5. The Lagrangian
The Lagrangian of the system is
. Substituting Eq.(
16) into it and using Eq. (
6), we get
4. Discussion—The Interpretation and Verification of the Unified Modal
In
Section 3 we develop the extended Maxwell equations and the formulas of interaction force etc, from which we spot the contained branch parameters
and
. In fact the branch parameters are inherited from the spacetime curls, which reflect the features of the spacetime. We will discuss the physical meaning of each of the branch parameters below and identify the electromagnetism and the gravity from the unified modal .
4.1. The System Is of Electromagnetism When
Substituting
into Eq. (
21),(
20) and (
29), apparently, we get the traditional Maxwell equation. The traditional Maxwell equation in complex form and the Lagrangian are below respectively
All other formulas we could get are in consistence with the traditional theory of electromagnetism [
24]. Note that in the unified charge system, the
and
in Eq. (
18) and (
21) etc are set in the same dimension and unit.
4.2. The Physical Meaning of Is About Mirror Systems
Observing Eq. (
21), (
23) and (
26),one can find that
always appears in the term with cross product,which means that the right-hand system with
and the left-hand system with
are equivalent. Eq. (
27) (
28) indicate that the interaction is independent of
.
Thus may describe the physically indistinguishable mirror systems.
4.3. The Physical Meaning of Is About the Nature of Charge
From Eq. (
27) (
28),we acquire that
means the charges with the same sign repel each other and the charges with opposite sign attract each other, while
means the charges with the same sign attract each other and the charges with the opposite sign repel each other, which can be called
the nature of charge. Thus we recognize that
represents the electromagnetism and represents the gravitation in which the mass is positive charge. Of course, compared to the situation for General Relativity, the gravitation here is weak and ready for Special Relativity.
Now we have identified the electromagnetism and the gravity in the unified modal in terms of branch parameters in the formulas, which are the reflection of the features of the spacetime characterized by the Special Relativity.
4.4. The Transfer From the Traditional Unit to the Unified Charge System
The interaction of electromagnetism and gravity can be calculated in the unified formulas (
27) (
28), the unified charge and currents of which can be transferred from the traditional ones respectively. Specificly the current density
in the unified charge system can be transferred from the traditional current density
as follows:
where for electromagnetism
,
is traditional electrical current density; for gravity
,
is the mass current density where the mass is rest mass and is Lorentz scalar. The transformation formulas for charges, fields and potentials can be easily obtained in analogy to Eq. (
31).
4.5. The Experimental Verification of the Unified Modal
Now we formulate an experiment to verify the unified modal. Provided that in the outer space there are two rest objects
and
with electric charge
and
of the same sign, satisfying
, which will yield two force cancelation in Eq. (
27). One will observe the vanishing interaction of them in the frame resting on the objects. On the principle of relativity one shall also see the vanishing interaction, including magnetism-like force, in the moving frame. We can easily show the unified modal meet the above description from Eq. (
21) (
27) (
28). On the contrary if the gravity do not obey the unified modal, It would be hard to satisfy the principle of relativity. Therefore the unified modal for gravity and electromagnetism is verified.
5. Conclusions
We construct the mathematical approach by introducing spacetime vectors, spacetime products and spacetime curls which originate from the physical spacetime nature. With the Lorentz condition the equations of spacetime curls are just equivalent to the extended Maxwell equations which are found to describe fields of the classical electromagnetism and the weak gravitation and their mirror systems.
Based on the extended Maxwell equations we preliminarily establish the unified modal of the two kinds of interaction in classical scope, in which we give the formulas of interaction force, energy flux density and the Lagrangian. In the unified modal the nature of charges is theoretically derived, which implies the nature of charges arises from the nature of spacetime. Moreover, it is obtained that the Maxwell equation has its mirror partner and the gravity unfolds its gravitomagnetic force [
16]. The unified charge system is proposed to facilitate the homogeneous description of electromagnetism and gravity in the formulas.
Notably, the unified modal is derived naturally and rigorously from the mere feature of physical spacetime with simple calculus, where we have given no extra hypothesis but rather some definitions and mathematical constructions in the spacetime. The the unified modal is verified by a formulated thought experiment.
Undeniably, there is still some work to be done to complete the modal, such as some specific applications and the interplay between electromagnetism and weak gravity, which would be attainable on basis of our framework. The unified modal is derived and applicable in the classical scope for electromagnetism and on the condition of weak gravity in flat space. By virtual of our perspectives and mathematical approach, to expand the scope in the unified modal to that of strong fields and quantization would probably be an interesting subject.
Funding
This research received no funding.
Data Availability Statement
All data are contained in this paper.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
References
- Thorne, K.S.; Misner, C.W.; Wheeler, J.A. Gravitation; Freeman: New York, 1973. [Google Scholar]
- Ciufolini, I.; Wheeler, J.A. Gravitation and Inertia; Princeton University Press, 1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weinberg, S. Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity; Wiley: New York, 1972. [Google Scholar]
- Carlos Barceló, S.L.; Visser, M. Analogue Gravity. Living Rev. Relativity 2005, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, L.F.O.; Herdeiro, C.A.R. Gravitoelectromagnetic analogy based on tidal tensors. Phys. Rev. D 2008, 78, 024021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mashhoon, B. Gravitoelectromagnetism. In Reference Frames and Gravitomagnetism; Proceedings of the XXIII Spanish Relativity Meeting, 2001; pp. 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bini, D.; Carini, P.; Jantzen, R.T.; Wilkins, D. Thomas precession in post-Newtonian gravitoelectromagnetism. Phys. Rev. D 1994, 49, 2820–2827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nouri-Zonoz, M. Gravitoelectromagnetic approach to the gravitational Faraday rotation in stationary spacetimes. Phys. Rev. D 1999, 60, 024013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bailey, Q.G. Lorentz-violating gravitoelectromagnetism. Phys. Rev. D 2010, 82, 065012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruggiero, M.L. Gravitomagnetic field of rotating rings. Astrophysics and Space Science 2016, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopeikin, S.; Mashhoon, B. Gravitomagnetic effects in the propagation of electromagnetic waves in variable gravitational fields of arbitrary-moving and spinning bodies. Phys. Rev. D 2002, 65, 064025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mashhoon, B. On the gravitational analogue of Larmor’s theorem. Phys. Lett. A 1993, 173, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lense, J.; Thirring, H. Phys. Z. 1918, 19, 156.
- Tajmar, M.; Assis, A. Gravitational induction with Weber’s force. Canadian Journal of Physics 2015, 93, 1571–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wald, R. Gravitational Spin Interaction. Phys. Rev. D 1972, 6, 406–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nordtvedt, K. Existence of the gravitomagnetic interaction. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 1988, 27, 1395–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciufolini, I.; Pavlis, E.C. A confirmation of the general relativistic prediction of the Lense–Thirring effect. Nature 2004, 431, 958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Everitt, C.W.F.; DeBra, D.B.; et al. Gravity Probe B: Final Results of a Space Experiment to Test General Relativity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106, 221101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boyeneni, S.; Wu, J.; Most, E.R. Unveiling the Electrodynamic Nature of Spacetime Collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2025, 135, 101401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Olivares, H.; Peshkov, I.M.; Most, E.R.; Guercilena, F.M.; Papenfort, L.J. New first-order formulation of the Einstein equations exploiting analogies with electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 105, 124038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López, G.V. On Maxwell Equations for Gravitational Field. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics 2018, 6, 932–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sattinger, D.H. On the universality of Maxwell’s equations. Monatsh Math 2018, 186, 503–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Landau, L.D.; Lifshitz, E.M. The Classical Theory of Fields; BH-Elsevier, 1980. [Google Scholar]
- Jackson, J.D. Classical Eectrodynamics, third ed.; Wiley, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Su, B. The spinor equation for the electromagnetic field. arXiv 2000, arXiv:quant-ph/0011061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).