Submitted:
14 December 2025
Posted:
15 December 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- i.
- uses a high-resolution (1 ha) pedoclimatic model that integrates topsoil texture to characterise microenvironmental conditions relevant to pest development;
- i.
- ii. assesses the future suitability of B. Oleae in global climate model simulations for near-term projections (2021–2040) compared with the current distribution of olive groves, identifying areas of current and potential risk;
- i.
- iii. uses response curves to define agronomically significant thresholds and predictor ranges, translating the ecological model’s outputs into an operational tool that supports IPM planning and management in Mediterranean olive systems.
- Which SDM provides the most accurate prediction of the presence of Bactrocera oleae in eastern Sicily?
- Which pedoclimatic factors mostly influence the probability of Bactrocera oleae presence under heterogeneous pedoclimatic conditions?
- How do the response curves derived from SDMs clarify the relationship between environmental predictors and the ecological niche of Bactrocera oleae?
- How would the spatial suitability of Bactrocera oleae change under future climate projections (2021–2040) according to global climate models?
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area and B. Oleae Occurrence Data
2.2. Pedoclimatic Predictors
- • Digital Terrain Model (DTM): The DTM, with a 20-m resolution, was acquired from the SITR geo-database through the GIS WFS (https://www.sitr.regione.sicilia.it/accessed on 13/02/2022 and unavailable at present).
- • Slope [%]: The slope of the terrain was computed, at a 20-m resolution, from DTM by using specific tools available in QGIS 3.22.1 (Sphinx, https://docs.qgis.org/3.40/it/docs/training_manual/index.html) .
- • Aspect [°]: The raster was produced from DTM by using specific tools available in QGIS 3.22.1 (Sphinx vectorization toolkit for QGIS, https://docs.qgis.org/3.40/it/docs/training_manual/index.html). This parameter contains values ranging from 0 to 360, which represent the direction of the slope, beginning with the north (0°) and continuing in a clockwise direction.
- • Volume of water in soil at a -5 cm depth, at saturated soil of -10 kPa (named Vw-10 hereafter), at field capacity of -33 kPa (named Vw-33 hereafter), and at permanent wilting point of -1500 kPa (named Vw-1500 hereafter), obtained from Soilgrid250 [18] (https://soilgrids.org/accessed on 02/10/2023).
- • Sand Content, Silt Content, Clay Content [g/kg]: Raster images were used to indicate the fine earth content present in the soil. According to the established definitions, particles classified as sand have a diameter between 2 and 0.05 mm; particles designated as silt have a diameter between 0.05 and 0.002 mm; and particles identified as clay are the finest fraction, with particles diameter less than 0.002 mm [18].

2.3. Implementation of Species Distribution Models (SDMs)
2.4. Output Assessment
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Analysis of Covariates and Models’ Metrics
3.2. Species Suitability Maps
3.2.1. Spatial Distribution of the B. Oleae in the Future Scenario 2021–2040
3.3. Assessment Through Analysis of Response Curves and Predictors
3.3.1. Climatic Predictors: A Focus on BIO2, BIO4, BIO15, BIO16
3.3.2. Soil Predictors (0–5 cm Texture: Sand, Silt, Clay)
3.3.3. Topographic Predictors (DTM, Elevation, Slope, Aspect)
4. Conclusion
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| Bio 2 | Mean Diurnal Range |
| Bio 4 | Temperature Seasonality |
| Bio 15 | Precipitation Seasonality |
| Bio 16 | Precipitation of Wettest Quarter |
| CMCC-ESM2 | Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici - Earth System Model 2 |
| CV | Cross-Validation |
| DOP | Protected Designation of Origin |
| DTM | Digital Terrain Model |
| GIS | Geographic Information System |
| IDW | Inverse Distance Weighting |
| IPCC | Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change |
| IPM | Integrated Pest Management |
| ISMEA | Istituto di Servizi per il Mercato Agricolo Alimentare |
| MaxEnt | Maximum Entropy |
| RF | Random Forest |
| ROC | Receiver Operating Characteristic |
| SDM | Species Distribution Model |
| TSS | True Skill Statistic |
| AUC | Area Under the Curve |
References
- IPCC. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Rondoni, G.; Mattioli, E.; Giannuzzi, V. A.; Chierici, E.; Betti, A.; Natale, G.; Conti, E. Evaluation of the effect of agroclimatic variables on the probability and timing of olive fruit fly attack. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024, 15, 1401669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Istituto di Servizi per il Mercato Agricolo Alimentare (ISMEA). Tendenze E Dinamiche recenti Olio D’oliva – Luglio 2025. Available online: https://www.ismeamercati.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeBLOB.php/L/IT/IDPagina/13559.
- Benelli, G.; Daane, K. M.; Canale, A.; Nadel, H.; Yokoyama, V. Y.; Messing, R. H. Integrated pest management of olive fruit fly (Bactrocera oleae): a review. Pest Management Science 2014, 70(11), 1641–1662. [Google Scholar]
- Volpi, I.; Guidotti, D.; Mammini, M.; Petacchi, R.; Marchi, S. Managing complex datasets to predict Bactrocera oleae infestation at the regional scale. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2020, 179, 105867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashraf, U.; Chaudhry, M. N.; Peterson, A. T. Ecological niche models of biotic interactions predict increasing pest risk to olive cultivars with changing climate. Ecosphere 2021, 12(8), e03714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, Z.; Yu, W.; Zhao, H.; Xian, X.; Jing, K.; Yang, N.; Liu, W. Potential Global Distribution of Invasive Alien Species, Anthonomus grandis Boheman, under Current and Future Climate Using Optimal MaxEnt Model. Agriculture 2022, 12(11), 1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing.; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Barbet-Massin, M.; Jiguet, F.; Albert, C. H.; Thuiller, W. Selecting pseudo-absences for species distribution models: how, where and how many? Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2012, 3(2), 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Catalano, G. A.; D’Urso, P. R.; Maci, F.; Arcidiacono, C. Influence of Parameters in SDM Application on Citrus Presence in Mediterranean Area. Sustainability 2023, 15(9), 7656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guisan, A.; Graham, C. H.; Elith, J.; Huettmann, F.; NCEAS Species Distribution Modelling Group. Sensitivity of predictive species distribution models to change in grain size. Diversity and Distributions 2007, 13(3), 332–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Preu, M.; Frieß, J. L.; Breckling, B.; Schröder, W. Case Study 1: Olive Fruit Fly (Bactrocera oleae). In Gene Drives at Tipping Points; Springer: Cham, 2020; pp. 79–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perez-Navarro, M. A.; Broennimann, O.; Esteve, M. A.; Bagaria, G.; Guisan, A.; Lloret, F. Comparing climatic suitability and niche distances to explain populations responses to extreme climatic events. Ecography 2022, 2022(11), e06263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nietupski, T. C.; Kim, J. B.; Tortorelli, C. M.; Lemons, R.; Kerns, B. K. Ventenata dubia projected to expand in the western United States despite future novel conditions. Ecosphere 2024, 15(9), e4979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hijmans, R. J.; Phillips, S.; Leathwick, J.; Elith, J. dismo: Species Distribution Modeling. R package version 1.1-4. 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Catalano, G. A.; D’Urso, P. R.; Arcidiacono, C. Predicting Potential Biomass Production by Geospatial Modelling: The Case Study of Citrus in a Mediterranean Area. Ecological Informatics 2024, 83, 102848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dimou, I.; Lambropoulos, P. A.; Kapatos, E. T. Soil factors affecting pupal distribution and mortality of the olive fruit fly Bactrocera oleae (Gmelin) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 2003, 127(8), 469–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poggio, L.; De Sousa, L. M.; Batjes, N. H.; Heuvelink, G. B.; Kempen, B.; Ribeiro, E.; Rossiter, D. SoilGrids 2.0: producing soil information for the globe with quantified spatial uncertainty. Soil 2021, 7(1), 217–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Da Silva, R. S.; Kumar, L.; Shabani, F.; Picanço, M. C. Potential risk levels of invasive Neoleucinodes elegantalis (small tomato borer) in areas optimal for open-field Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) cultivation in the present and under predicted climate change. Pest Management Science 2017, 73(3), 616–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Catalano, G. A.; Maci, F.; D’Urso, P. R.; Arcidiacono, C. GIS and SDM-Based Methodology for Resource Optimisation: Feasibility Study for Citrus in Mediterranean Area. Agronomy 2023, 13(2), 549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- See, K. E.; Ackerman, M. W.; Carmichael, R. A.; Hoffmann, S. L.; Beasley, C. Estimating carrying capacity for juvenile salmon using quantile random forest models. Ecosphere 2021, 12(3), e03404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, T.; Elith, J.; Lahoz-Monfort, J. J.; Guillera-Arroita, G. Testing whether ensemble modelling is advantageous for maximising predictive performance of species distribution models. Ecography 2020, 43(4), 549–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Neven, L. G.; Yee, W. L. Evaluating correlative and mechanistic niche models for assessing the risk of pest establishment. Ecosphere 2014, 5(7), art85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dormann, C. F.; Elith, J.; Bacher, S.; Buchmann, C.; Carl, G.; Carré, G.; Lautenbach, S. Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 2013, 36(1), 27–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Arrigo, G.; Provenzano, F.; Torino, C.; Zoccali, C.; Tripepi, G. I test diagnostici e l’analisi della curva ROC. Giornale Italiano di Nefrologia 2011, 28(5), 642–647. [Google Scholar]
- Warren, D. L.; Seifert, S. N. Ecological niche modeling in Maxent: the importance of model complexity and the performance of model selection criteria. Ecological Applications 2011, 21(2), 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukherjee, T.; Sharma, V.; Sharma, L. K.; Thakur, M.; Joshi, B. D.; Sharief, A.; Sathyakumar, S. Landscape-level habitat management plan through geometric reserve design for critically endangered hangul (Cervus hanglu hanglu). Science of The Total Environment 2021, 777, 146031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allouche, O.; Tsoar, A.; Kadmon, R. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). Journal of Applied Ecology 2006, 43(6), 1223–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Beest, F. M.; McLoughlin, P. D.; Mysterud, A.; Brook, R. K. Functional responses in habitat selection are density dependent in a large herbivore. Ecography 2016, 39(6), 515–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benhadi-Marín, J.; Santos, S. A. P.; Baptista, P.; Pereira, J. A. Distribution of Bactrocera oleae (Rossi, 1790) throughout the Iberian Peninsula based on a maximum entropy modelling approach. Annals of Applied Biology 2020, 177(1), 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lobo, J. M.; Jiménez-Valverde, A.; Real, R. AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Global Ecology and Biogeography 2008, 17(2), 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peterson, A. T.; Soberón, J.; Pearson, R. G.; Anderson, R. P.; Martínez-Meyer, E.; Nakamura, M.; Araújo, M. B. Ecological niches and geographic distributions; Princeton University Press, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Merow, C.; Smith, M. J.; Silander, J. A., Jr. A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: what it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography 2013, 36(10), 1058–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Titeux, Nicolas; Henle, Klaus; Mihoub, Jean-Baptiste; Regos, Adrián; Geijzendorffer, Ilse R.; Lluís.
- Titeux, N.; Henle, K.; Mihoub, J.-B.; Regos, A.; Geijzendorffer, I. R.; Cramer, W.; Verburg, P. H.; Brotons, L. Global scenarios for biodiversity need to better integrate climate and land use change. Diversity and Distributions 2017, 23(11), 1231–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turner, M. G.; Gardner, R. H.; O’Neill, R. V. Landscape ecology in theory and practice; Springer, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X. G.; Levy, K.; Nadel, H.; Johnson, M. W.; Blanchet, A.; Argov, Y.; Daane, K. M. Overwintering survival of olive fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) and two introduced parasitoids in California. Environmental Entomology 2013, 42(3), 467–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lantero, E.; Matallanas, B.; Callejas, C. Current Status of the Main Olive Pests: Useful Integrated Pest Management Strategies and Genetic Tools. Applied Sciences 2023, 13(21), 12078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cinardi, G.; D’Urso, P. R.; Arcidiacono, C.; Ingrao, C. Accounting for circular economy principles in Life Cycle Assessments of extra-virgin olive oil supply chains – Findings from a systematic literature review. Science of The Total Environment 2024, 945, 173977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Caselli, A.; Favaro, R.; Petacchi, R.; Angeli, S. Infestation of the gall midge Dasineura oleae provides first evidence of induced plant volatiles in olive leaves. Bulletin of Entomological Research 2022, 112(4), 481–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lal, R. Soil texture, soil structure, and soil organic matter effects on carbon sequestration. Soil and Tillage Research 2004, 78(2), 183–193. [Google Scholar]
- Papadopoulos, N. T.; Katsoyannos, B. I. Field studies on the olive fruit fly (Bactrocera oleae) pupal mortality. Phytoparasitica 2003, 31, 347–355. [Google Scholar]








| MaxEnt | Random Forest | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUC | TSS | AUC | TSS | |||
| Training | 0.939 | 0.721 | 0.970 | 0.822 | ||
| CrossValidation | 0.892 | 0.612 | 0.967 | 0.681 | ||
| ΔAUC | 0.047 | 0.004 | ||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).