Submitted:
28 November 2025
Posted:
03 December 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- What data are cited in research and applied in practice to inform SPM decision-making contributing to stock management policy decisions?
- How can these data be integrated into an empirical data model linking the siloed SPM knowledge areas?
- What are the effects of implementing the empirical SPM data model in decision-making practices?
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Phase 1 - Exploratory Study
2.2.Phase 2 - Prescriptive Research
2.3.Systematic Literature Review
3. Literature Review
3.1. Spare Parts Availability Decisions in SPM
3.2. Decision-Making Approaches and Methodologies in SPM
3.3. Knowledge Areas and Decision-Makers in SPM
- Spare parts characteristics data
- Spare parts supply/logistics data
- Maintenance/demand data
- Inventory/stocking data
- Maintainable asset data (plant/system/equipment)
- Costs and other data
3.4. Data as a Decision-Support Basis in SPM
4. Development of an Empirical Spare Parts Management Data Model
4.1. Data Fields Important in Case Company SPM Practices
4.2. Locating Scattered Data in a CMMS
4.3. The Proposed Empirical SPM Data Model
- Spare part number: a unique identifier coded in the MM module for each unique spare part added to the CMMS. In the model, this links spare parts to BOM parts, to spare parts in maintenance orders, to inventory, and to spare part movements.
- Maintenance order number: a unique identifier created in the PM module for each maintenance order. In the model, this relates spare parts to maintenance and maintenance to failures and further maintenance details.
- Equipment number: a unique identifier for each item of equipment in the maintainable asset. In the model, this links maintenance orders to the maintainable asset.
5. Case Study – Operationalization of the SPM Data Model
5.1. Study I – Document-Based and Bulk Decision Approach
5.2. Study II – Document-Based Approach
5.3. Study III – Model-Based Approach with the Proposed SPM Data Model
6. Discussion
6.1. Implications for Research and Industry
6.2. Study Limitations and Future Research
7. Conclusion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| BOM | Bill of Material |
| BI | Business Intelligence |
| CMMS | Computerized Maintenance Management System |
| EDAS | Distance from Average Solution |
| FMEA | Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |
| E&P | Exploration & Production |
| FTE | Full-Time Equivalent |
| IT | Information Technology |
| JIT | Just-In-Time |
| MCDM | Multi-Criteria Decision-Making |
| MM | Materials Management |
| MRO | Maintenance, Repair, and Operations |
| MRP | Material Requirement Planning |
| MS | Microsoft |
| PHM | Proportional Hazards Model |
| PM | Plant Maintenance |
| ROP | Re-Ordering Points |
| SKU | Stock-Keeping Unit |
| SPIM | Spare Parts Inventory Management |
| SPM | Spare Parts Management |
References
- Scarf, P.; Syntetos, A.; Teunter, R. Joint Maintenance and Spare-Parts Inventory Models: A Review and Discussion of Practical Stock-Keeping Rules. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics 2023, 35, 83–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Horenbeek, A.; Buré, J.; Cattrysse, D.; Pintelon, L.; Vansteenwegen, P. Joint Maintenance and Inventory Optimization Systems: A Review. International Journal of Production Economics 2013, 143, 499–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Jaarsveld, W.; Dekker, R. Spare Parts Stock Control for Redundant Systems Using Reliability Centered Maintenance Data. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2011, 96, 1576–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cakmak, E.; Guney, E. Spare Parts Inventory Classification Using Neutrosophic Fuzzy EDAS Method in the Aviation Industry. Expert Systems with Applications 2023, 224, 120008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teixeira, C.; Lopes, I.; Figueiredo, M. Spare Parts Stock Management: Classification and Policy Assignment. FME Transactions 2024, 52, 257–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balugani, E.; Lolli, F.; Gamberini, R.; Rimini, B.; Regattieri, A. Clustering for Inventory Control Systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2018, 51, 1174–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turrini, L.; Meissner, J. Spare Parts Inventory Management: New Evidence from Distribution Fitting. European Journal of Operational Research 2019, 273, 118–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinçe, Ç.; Turrini, L.; Meissner, J. Intermittent Demand Forecasting for Spare Parts: A Critical Review. Omega 2021, 105, 102513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, V.F.; Salsabila, N.Y.; Siswanto, N.; Kuo, P.H. A Two-Stage Genetic Algorithm for Joint Coordination of Spare Parts Inventory and Planned Maintenance under Uncertain Failures. Applied Soft Computing 2022, 130, 109705–109705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kulshrestha, N.; Agrawal, S.; Shree, D. Spare Parts Management in Industry 4.0 Era: A Literature Review. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scala, N.M.; Rajgopal, J.; Needy, K.L. Managing Nuclear Spare Parts Inventories: A Data Driven Methodology. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2014, 61, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vazquez Hernandez, J.; Elizondo Rojas, M.D. Improving Spare Parts (MRO) Inventory Management Policies after COVID-19 Pandemic: A Lean Six Sigma 4.0 Project. The TQM Journal 2024, 36, 1627–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stip, J.; Van Houtum, G.J. On a Method to Improve Your Service BOMs within Spare Parts Management. International Journal of Production Economics 2020, 221, 107466–107466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, M.A.; Agrawal, N.; Agrawal, V. Winning in the Aftermarket. Harvard Business Review 2006, 84, 129–138. [Google Scholar]
- Bacchetti, A.; Plebani, F.; Saccani, N.; Syntetos, A.A. Empirically-Driven Hierarchical Classification of Stock Keeping Units. International Journal of Production Economics 2013, 143, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavalieri, S.; Garetti, M.; MacChi, M.; Pinto, R. A Decision-Making Framework for Managing Maintenance Spare Parts. Production Planning & Control 2008, 19, 379–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roda, I.; Macchi, M.; Fumagalli, L.; Viveros, P. A Review of Multi-Criteria Classification of Spare Parts. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 2014, 25, 528–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayu Nariswari, N.P.; Bamford, D.; Dehe, B. Testing an AHP Model for Aircraft Spare Parts. Production Planning & Control 2019, 30, 329–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, T. kumar; Mishra, M.R. A Study on Challenges and Opportunities in Master Data Management. International Journal of Database Management Systems 2011, 3, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karlsson, C. Research Methods for Operations Management, Second Edition; Routledge, Taylor & Francis group, London New York, 2016. [CrossRef]
- Saunders, M.; Lewis, P.; Thornhill, A. Research Methods for Business Students, Fifth Edition; Prentice Hall 2007, ISBN:0273701487.
- Teixeira, C.; Lopes, I.; Figueiredo, M. Multi-Criteria Classification for Spare Parts Management: A Case Study. Procedia Manufacturing 2017, 11, 1560–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Huang, K.; Yuan, Y. Spare Parts Inventory Management: A Literature Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2460–2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Q.; Chakhar, S.; Siraj, S.; Labib, A. Spare Parts Classification in Industrial Manufacturing Using the Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach. European Journal of Operational Research 2017, 262, 1136–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boylan, J.E.; Syntetos, A.A. Spare Parts Management: A Review of Forecasting Research and Extensions. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics 2010, 21, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhalla, S.; Alfnes, E.; Hvolby, H.H.; Sgarbossa, F. Advances in Spare Parts Classification and Forecasting for Inventory Control: A Literature Review. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2021, 54, 982–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boone, C.A.; Craighead, C.W.; Hanna, J.B. Critical Challenges of Inventory Management in Service Parts Supply: A Delphi Study. Operations Management Research 2008, 1, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bokrantz, J.; Skoogh, A.; Berlin, C.; Stahre, J. Maintenance in Digitalised Manufacturing: Delphi-Based Scenarios for 2030. International Journal of Production Economics 2017, 191, 154–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hodkiewicz, M.; Ho, M.T.W. Cleaning Historical Maintenance Work Order Data for Reliability Analysis. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 2016, 22, 146–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stark, J. Product Lifecycle Management, Vol. 2, Springer International Publishing, 2016, Product Data, pp. 145–180. [CrossRef]
- Bacchetti, A.; Saccani, N. Spare Parts Classification and Demand Forecasting for Stock Control: Investigating the Gap between Research and Practice. Omega 2012, 40, 722–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Q.; Boylan, J.E.; Chen, H.; Labib, A. OR in Spare Parts Management: A Review. European Journal of Operational Research 2018, 266, 395–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tusar, M.I.H.; Sarker, B.R. Spare Parts Control Strategies for Offshore Wind Farms: A Critical Review and Comparative Study. Wind Engineering 2022, 46, 1629–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benshimol, C.; Barron, Y. Stock-out Policies of a Spare-Parts Warehouse for a Multi-Item Repairable System. International Journal of Production Research 2025, 0, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, J.; Ishizaka, A.; Babai, M.Z. Enhancing Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification: Resolving Boundary Issues with VIKOR-Fuzzy Sorting. International Journal of Production Economics 2025, 281, 109526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torre, N.M.M.; Salomon, V.A.P.; Florek-Paszkowska, A.K. Multi-Criteria Classification of Spare Parts in the Steel Industry. BJO&PM 2025, 22, 2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farizal; Taurina, Z.; Endrianto, E.; Nurcahyo, R. Yassierli Power Plant Spare Parts Inventory Determination Using Modified Multi-Criteria Classification and the Semi-Delphi Methods. Arab J Sci Eng 2025, 50, 11313–11332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muniz, L.R.; Conceição, S.V.; Rodrigues, L.F.; de Freitas Almeida, J.F.; Affonso, T.B. Spare Parts Inventory Management: A New Hybrid Approach. International Journal of Logistics Management 2021, 32, 40–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van der Auweraer, S.; Boute, R.N.; Syntetos, A.A. Forecasting Spare Part Demand with Installed Base Information: A Review. International Journal of Forecasting 2019, 35, 181–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lelo, N.A.; Heyns, P.S.; Wannenburg, J. Forecasting Spare Parts Demand Using Condition Monitoring Information. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 2019, 26, 53–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Gao, W.; Yang, T.; Guo, S. Opportunistic Maintenance Strategy for Wind Turbines Considering Weather Conditions and Spare Parts Inventory Management. Renewable Energy 2019, 133, 703–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferdinand, R.; Monti, A.; Labusch, K. Determining Spare Part Inventory for Offshore Wind Farm Substations Based on FMEA Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT-Europe); October 2018; pp. 1–6.
- Wang, X.; Chen, Q.; Fu, L.; Yang, Q. Optimization on Management Strategies for Spare Parts Inventories of Wind Turbine Components. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 8th Annual International Conference on CYBER Technology in Automation, Control, and Intelligent Systems (CYBER); July 2018; pp. 1472–1477.
- Arvesen, A.; Luderer, G.; Pehl, M.; Bodirsky, B.L.; Hertwich, E.G. Deriving Life Cycle Assessment Coefficients for Application in Integrated Assessment Modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software 2018, 99, 111–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferreira, L.M.D.F.; Maganha, I.; Magalhães, V.S.M.; Almeida, M. A Multicriteria Decision Framework for the Management of Maintenance Spares - A Case Study. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2018, 51, 531–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishizaka, A.; Lolli, F.; Balugani, E.; Cavallieri, R.; Gamberini, R. DEASort: Assigning Items with Data Envelopment Analysis in ABC Classes. International Journal of Production Economics 2018, 199, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moharana, U.C.; Sarmah, S.P. Joint Replenishment of Associated Spare Parts Using Clustering Approach. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2018, 94, 2535–2549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dahane, M.; Sahnoun, M.; Bettayeb, B.; Baudry, D.; Boudhar, H. Impact of Spare Parts Remanufacturing on the Operation and Maintenance Performance of Offshore Wind Turbines: A Multi-Agent Approach. J Intell Manuf 2017, 28, 1531–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, J.; Yin, Y.; Zhang, L.; Chen, X. Joint Optimization of Preventive Maintenance and Spare Parts Inventory with Appointment Policy. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2017, 2017, 3493687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pennings, C.L.P.; van Dalen, J.; van der Laan, E.A. Exploiting Elapsed Time for Managing Intermittent Demand for Spare Parts. European Journal of Operational Research 2017, 258, 958–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baykasoğlu, A.; Subulan, K.; Karaslan, F.S. A New Fuzzy Linear Assignment Method for Multi-Attribute Decision Making with an Application to Spare Parts Inventory Classification. Applied Soft Computing 2016, 42, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schuh, P.; Schneider, D.; Funke, L.; Tracht, K. Cost-Optimal Spare Parts Inventory Planning for Wind Energy Systems. Logist. Res. 2015, 8, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stoll, J.; Kopf, R.; Schneider, J.; Lanza, G. Criticality Analysis of Spare Parts Management: A Multi-Criteria Classification Regarding a Cross-Plant Central Warehouse Strategy. Production Engineering 2015, 9, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarmah, S.P.; Moharana, U.C. Multi-Criteria Classification of Spare Parts Inventories – a Web Based Approach. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 2015, 21, 456–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rego, J.R.D.; Mesquita, M.A.D. Demand Forecasting and Inventory Control: A Simulation Study on Automotive Spare Parts. International Journal of Production Economics 2015, 161, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lolli, F.; Ishizaka, A.; Gamberini, R. New AHP-Based Approaches for Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification. International Journal of Production Economics 2014, 156, 62–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lengu, D.; Syntetos, A.A.; Babai, M.Z. Spare Parts Management: Linking Distributional Assumptions to Demand Classification. European Journal of Operational Research 2014, 235, 624–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hellingrath, B.; Cordes, A.-K. Conceptual Approach for Integrating Condition Monitoring Information and Spare Parts Forecasting Methods. Production & Manufacturing Research 2014, 2, 725–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tracht, K.; Westerholt, J.; Schuh, P. Spare Parts Planning for Offshore Wind Turbines Subject to Restrictive Maintenance Conditions. Procedia CIRP 2013, 7, 563–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heinecke, G.; Syntetos, A.A.; Wang, W. Forecasting-Based SKU Classification. International Journal of Production Economics 2013, 143, 455–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dekker, R.; Pinçe, Ç.; Zuidwijk, R.; Jalil, M.N. On the Use of Installed Base Information for Spare Parts Logistics: A Review of Ideas and Industry Practice. International Journal of Production Economics 2013, 143, 536–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molenaers, A.; Baets, H.; Pintelon, L.; Waeyenbergh, G. Criticality Classification of Spare Parts: A Case Study. International Journal of Production Economics 2012, 140, 570–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, Y.-R.; Wang, L.; He, J. A Novel Approach for Evaluating Control Criticality of Spare Parts Using Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation and GRA. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 2012, 14, 392–401. [Google Scholar]
- Syntetos, A.A.; Babai, M.Z.; Altay, N. On the Demand Distributions of Spare Parts. International Journal of Production Research 2012, 50, 2101–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rad, T.; Shanmugarajan, N.; Wahab, M.I.M. Classification of Critical Spares for Aircraft Maintenance. In Proceedings of the ICSSSM11; June 2011; pp. 1–6.
- Hadi-Vencheh, A.; Mohamadghasemi, A. A Fuzzy AHP-DEA Approach for Multiple Criteria ABC Inventory Classification. Expert Systems with Applications 2011, 38, 3346–3352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezaei, J.; Dowlatshahi, S. A Rule-Based Multi-Criteria Approach to Inventory Classification. International Journal of Production Research 2010, 48, 7107–7126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Chu, J.; Mao, W. A Condition-Based Replacement and Spare Provisioning Policy for Deteriorating Systems with Uncertain Deterioration to Failure. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 194, 184–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Persson, F.; Saccani, N. Managing the After-Sales Logistic Network–a Simulation Study. Production Planning & Control 2009, 20, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Syntetos, A.A.; Keyes, M.; Babai, M.Z. Demand Categorisation in a European Spare Parts Logistics Network. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 2009, 29, 292–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, C.-W.; Liang, G.-S.; Liao, C.-T. Controlling Inventory by Combining ABC Analysis and Fuzzy Classification. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2008, 55, 841–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, R.; Yue, C.; Xie, J. Joint Optimization of Age Replacement and Spare Ordering Policy Based on Genetic Algorithm. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security; December 2008; Vol. 1, pp. 156–161.
- Nguyen, D.; Bagajewicz, M. Optimization of Preventive Maintenance Scheduling in Processing Plants. In Proceedings of the Computer Aided Chemical Engineering; Elsevier, 2008; Vol. 25, pp. 319–324.
- Cakir, O.; Canbolat, M.S. A Web-Based Decision Support System for Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using Fuzzy AHP Methodology. Expert Systems with Applications 2008, 35, 1367–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elwany, AlaaH.; Gebraeel, NagiZ. Sensor-Driven Prognostic Models for Equipment Replacement and Spare Parts Inventory. IIE Transactions 2008, 40, 629–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, D.Q.; Brammer, C.; Bagajewicz, M. New Tool for the Evaluation of the Scheduling of Preventive Maintenance for Chemical Process Plants. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 1910–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Chu, J.; Mao, W. A Condition-Based Order-Replacement Policy for a Single-Unit System. Applied Mathematical Modelling 2008, 32, 2274–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, J.; Wang, H. Joint Optimization of Condition-Based Preventive Maintenance and Spare Ordering Policy. In Proceedings of the 2008 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing; October 2008; pp. 1–5.
- Wang, L.; Chu, J.; Mao, W. An Optimum Condition-based Replacement and Spare Provisioning Policy Based on Markov Chains. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 2008, 14, 387–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Çelebi, D.; Bayraktar, D.; Aykaç, D.S.Ö. Multi Criteria Classification for Spare Parts Inventory. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2008; Vol. 2; pp. 1780–1787.
- Lee, Y.-M.; Tzeng, Y.-E. Development and Life-Cycle Inventory Analysis of Wind Energy in Taiwan. J. Energy Eng.-ASCE 2008, 134, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porras, E.; Dekker, R. An Inventory Control System for Spare Parts at a Refinery: An Empirical Comparison of Different Re-Order Point Methods. European Journal of Operational Research 2008, 184, 101–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boylan, J.E.; Syntetos, A.A.; Karakostas, G.C. Classification for Forecasting and Stock Control: A Case Study. Journal of the Operational Research Society 2008, 59, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Li, K.W.; Marc Kilgour, D.; Hipel, K.W. A Case-Based Distance Model for Multiple Criteria ABC Analysis. Computers & Operations Research 2008, 35, 776–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janssen, M.; van der Voort, H.; Wahyudi, A. Factors Influencing Big Data Decision-Making Quality. Journal of Business Research 2017, 70, 338–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hubka, V.; Eder, W.E. Theory of Technical Systems; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg, 1988; ISBN 978-3-642-52123-2. [Google Scholar]
- Sigsgaard, K.V.; Agergaard, J.K.; Bertram, C.A.; Mortensen, N.H.; Soleymani, I.; Khalid, W.; Hansen, K.B.; Mueller, G.O. Structuring and Contextualizing Historical Data for Decision Making in Early Development; Cambridge University Press, 2020; Vol. 1, pp. 393–402.
- Didriksen, S.; Hansen, K.B.; Sigsgaard, K.V.; Mortensen, N.H.; Agergaard, J.K.; Ge, J. Utilising Failure History to Improve Maintenance Planning; The Design Society, 2022; pp. 12–12.




| Data | Spare parts | Maintenance | Decisions | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data Empirical Parameter(s) Attribute(s) Information System(s) Model(s) CMM(s) MM(s) |
AND | Spare part(s) Repair part(s) Inventory Stock Stock keeping units SKU(s) |
AND | Maintenance Maintain* MRO |
AND | Management Planning SPM SPIM Control Stocking Availability Decision(s) |
![]()
|
![]() |
| Knowledge Area | Data Field | Description |
|---|---|---|
| A. Spare parts characteristics |
Technical discipline | Type of specialist using the part. |
| Technical attributes | Part specifications (e.g., dimensions or capacities). | |
| Spare part type | Categories (e.g., valve, pump, motor). | |
| Spare part description | Textual part descriptor. | |
| Classification | Current part class. | |
| B. Spare parts supply/logistics |
Supplier information | Supplier name and part number. |
| Internal processing time | Internal procurement and logistics process time. | |
| Internal transport time | Transport time (warehouse to maintenance location). | |
| C. Maintenance/ demand |
Demand type | Type of maintenance job requiring the part. |
| Demand priority/requirement | Urgency and time requirement of the maintenance job. | |
| Planner | Maintenance planner responsible for the maintenance job related to the part. | |
| D. Inventory/ stocking |
Unit type | Unit of measure for the part. |
| Inventory type | Inventory type or storage location holding the part. | |
| Unit condition | Physical or certifiable condition of the part unit. | |
| Repairability | Indicates if the part can be repaired. | |
| Unit restrictions/blocking | Usage or availability constraint for the part. | |
| KIT | Indicates if the part belongs to a repair kit. | |
| Stock management policy | Current inventory control policy applied. | |
| E. Maintainable asset | Technical responsibility | Maintenance planner responsible for the equipment containing the part on its BOM. |
| Repairability | Indicates if the equipment is repairable. |
| Case study context measures | Study I | Study II | Study III |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spare parts review approach | Document-based & bulk decision strategy |
Document-based | Model-based |
| Number of spare parts in the project scope | 10,843 | 10,843 | 10,843 |
| Scope coverage of the total stock value | 36% | 32% | 34% |
| Stock value increase since project initiation | 0% | 6% | 9% |
| Case study period duration | 6 months | 5 months | 11 months |
| Number of data fields in the decision basis | 22 | 24 | 41 |
| Data points available per spare part | 49 | 54 | 84 |
| Data field coverage of knowledge areas | 39% | 46% | 89% |
| Case study findings measure | Study I | Study II | Study III |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of spare parts finalized (% of scope) |
2,820 | 193 | 10,843 |
| (26%) | (2%) | (100%) | |
| Resulting stock value change: (1) to the total stock value (2) to the stock value of the scope |
Stock increased | Stock decreased | Stock decreased |
| 0.6% | -0.1% | -15.1% | |
| 1.6% | -0.3% | -45.0% | |
| Number of decision-makers enabled | 2 | 3 | 32 |
| Total FTE requirement | 3.85 FTEs | 9.83 FTEs | 0.93 FTEs |
| Total number of decisions made | 7,865 | 666 | 35,898 |
| Spare parts with new policy | 41% | 84% | 56% |
| Decision quality (decision without errors) | 91% | 90% | 95% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).


