Submitted:
28 July 2025
Posted:
29 July 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
Introduction
- How does IOS adoption impact Supply Chain Performance (SCP)?
- What is the effect of IOS adoption on B2B integration within the supply chain?
- How does B2B integration influence SCP?
- Does B2B integration mediate the relationship between IOS adoption and SCP, and if so, how?
2. Theoretical framework
2.1. Supply Chain Management (SCM)
2.2. Supply Chain Performance (SCP)
2.3. Interorganizational System (IOS)
2.4. Business-to-Business (B2B) Integration
- Trust: Trust forms the cornerstone of business-to-business relationships by creating a cooperative environment that reduces transaction risks and promotes open information sharing (Haghkhah et al., 2020).
- Loyalty: Loyalty reflects the commitment of partners to maintain long-term relationships, which supports continuity and joint strategic planning (Hossain et al., 2024; Kim et al., 2024).
- Coordination: The ability of parties to organize their joint activities in a synchronized manner to avoid conflicts and improve operational performance (Haghkhah et al., 2020).
- Information Exchange: Represents the level of transparency and open communication that allows for timely and data-driven decision making (Alavi et al., 2020; da Silva et al., 2024).
- Customer Service: The support provided before, during, and after sales to enhance customer satisfaction and build sustainable relationships (Turban et al., 2015; Bone et al., 2015).
2.5. Hypothesis Development
- Independent Variable: IOS
- Mediator Variable: B2B Integration
- Dependent Variable: SCP
| no. | Indicator | Based on references | Construct |
|---|---|---|---|
| IOSA1 | Communication | (de Mattos and Laurindo, 2017) (Zhang and Cao, 2017) (Kurnia et al., 2019) |
|
| IOSA2 | Intelligence | (Abou et al., 2023) (Zhang and Cao, 2017) (Asamoah et al., 2021), (Anwar, 2022) |
IOS Adoption |
| IOSA3 | Mutual Dependence |
(Kurnia et al., 2019) | |
| IOSA4 | Transparency | (Cho, Ryoo and Kim, 2017) | |
| IOSA5 | Collaboration | (Leppikorpi, 2018) (Alavi et al., 2020) | |
| BI1 | Trust | Haghkhah et al., (2020) | B2B Integration |
| BI2 | Loyalty | Haghkhah et al., (2020) (Kim et al., 2024). | |
| BI3 | Coordination | Haghkhah et al., (2020) | |
| BI4 | Information Exchange | (Alavi et al., 2020) (da Silva et al., 2024) | |
| BI5 | Customer Service | (Turban et al., 2015) (Bone et al., 2015) | |
| SCP1 | Flexibility | (Asamoah et al., 2021), (Delic and Eyers, 2020) (Anwar, 2022)(Delic and Eyers, 2020) (Anwar, 2022) |
SCP |
| SCP2 | Efficiency | (Asamoah et al., 2019) (Anwar, 2022) (Alavi et al., 2020) | |
| SCP3 | Delivery Time | (Delic and Eyers, 2020), (Asamoah et al., 2019) (Anwar, 2022) (Alavi et al., 2020) | |
| SCP4 | Demand Fulfillment | (Delic and Eyers, 2020). | |
| SCP5 | Customer Satisfaction | (Delic and Eyers, 2020). (Achetoui, Mabrouki and Mousrij, 2019b) |
| Study | Model Focus | Key Variables | Main Findings | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Veronesi, 2017) | How B2B Integration Drives Superior Supply Chain Performance (SCP) | B2B Integration and SCP | The study underscores the critical role of B2B integration in driving superior SCP | |
| Sundram et al., (2020) | Impact of IT and IS on SCI, SCP, and firm performance | IT, IS, SCI, firm performance | Effective use of IT and IS enhances SCI and SCP, improving overall firm performance by better integrating internal and external value chains. | |
| Rahman et al., (2023) | Role of supply chain resilience and customer engagement in SCP | Supply chain resilience, adaptive capability, customer engagement, sustainable SCP | Supply chain resilience positively impacts sustainable SCP, especially with high customer engagement, underscoring the role of engagement in adaptive capabilities. | |
| Asamoah et al., (2019) | IOS adoption and its effects on SCP and supply chain capabilities | IOS, flexibility, responsiveness, coordination, SCP | IOS adoption directly improves SCP by enhancing flexibility, responsiveness, and coordination. Supply chain capabilities mediate the relationship between IOS adoption and SCP. | |
| Alavi et al., (2020) | Impact of environmental uncertainty on IOS adoption in supply chains | IOS, environmental uncertainty, trust, information sharing, operational efficiency | Environmental uncertainty hinders IOS adoption due to trust issues and reluctance to share information. However, effective internal resource management can still result in better operational efficiency and competitive advantage. | |
| The current study | IOS adoption, B2B integration, and SCP in the automotive spare parts industry | IOS, B2B integration, SCP | IOS adoption and B2B integration improve SCP in the Palestinian automotive sector by enhancing key supply chain capabilities such as flexibility, responsiveness, and coordination. |
2.6. Resource-Based View (RBV) as Theoretical Foundation
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Sampling and Data Collection
3.1.1. Sample Selection
- Minimum R-squared Value: The assumption was made based on achieving a minimum R-squared value of 25%, indicating the desired level of explained variance in the model.
- Maximum Number of Arrows Pointing at a Construct: In the conceptual model used for this study, each construct is associated with 5 arrows, representing the number of indicators linking to each construct.
- Significance Level (α): A significance level of 5% (0.05) was chosen, which represents the acceptable risk of making a type I error (false positive) in hypothesis testing.
![]() |
3.1.2. Data Collection Method
3.2. Survey Instrument
3.2.1. Questionnaire Design
3.2.2. Questionnaire Validation
3.3. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Analysis of Respondents' Demographic Profiles
| Demographic | Item | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Company Size | Small | 23 | 32.9% |
| Large | 9 | 12.9% | |
| Medium | 38 | 54.3% | |
| Company Scope of Business | Others | 2 | 3% |
| Workshop | 33 | 47% | |
| Retailer | 25 | 36% | |
| Wholesaler | 10 | 14% | |
| Type of Required Goods | Oils and Lubricants | 5 | 7.1% |
| Others | 10 | 14.3% | |
| Accessories | 7 | 10.0% | |
| Spare Parts | 48 | 68.6% | |
| Job Title | Top Management | 24 | 34.3% |
| Others | 12 | 17.1% | |
| Marketing and Sales | 16 | 22.9% | |
| Purchasing | 18 | 25.7% | |
| Company Age (years) | 15 and more | 14 | 20.0% |
| Less than 1 | 1 | 1.4% | |
| 1-5 | 28 | 40.0% | |
| 6-14 | 27 | 38.6% | |
| Current Use of Websites | 20% -50% | 11 | 15.7% |
| 20% or less | 54 | 77.1% | |
| 50% and more | 5 | 7.1% |
4.2. Measurement Model Assessment

4.2.1. Indicator Loadings and Item Reliability
| Indicator | Point estimation | T-values | P-values | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B | B2B Integration | |||
| BI1 | Trust | 0.760 | 9.732 | 0.000 |
| BI2 | Loyalty | 0.663 | 7.195 | 0.000 |
| BI3 | Coordination | 0.728 | 8.660 | 0.000 |
| BI4 | Information Exchange | 0.792 | 14.541 | 0.000 |
| IOSA | IOS Adoption | |||
| IOSA2 | Intelligence | 0.772 | 12.044 | 0.000 |
| IOSA3 | Mutual Dependence | 0.659 | 7.381 | 0.000 |
| IOSA4 | Transparency | 0.813 | 22.107 | 0.000 |
| IOSA5 | Collaboration | 0.677 | 7.562 | 0.000 |
| SCP | Supply Chain Performance | |||
| SCP1 | Flexibility | 0.832 | 20.493 | 0.000 |
| SCP2 | Efficiency | 0.796 | 17.508 | 0.000 |
| SCP3 | Delivery Time | 0.714 | 5.628 | 0.000 |
4.2.2. Reliability and Validity Assessment
| R2 | Cronbach Alpha | Composite Reliability | Average Variance Extracted (AVE) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B integration | 0.405 | 0.722 | 0.826 | 0.544 |
| IOS Adoption | 0.714 | 0.822 | 0.537 | |
| SCP | 0.383 | 0.690 | 0.825 | 0.612 |
4.2.3. Discriminant Validity Assessment
| Fornell-Larcker | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| B2B | IA | SCP | |
| B2B | 0.737 | ||
| IOSA | 0.636 | 0.733 | |
| SCP | 0.545 | 0.573 | 0.782 |
| HTMT | |||
| B2B | IA | SCP | |
| B2B | |||
| IOSA | 0.844 | ||
| SCP | 0.741 | 0.763 | |
4.3. Structural Model Analysis Results
4.3.1. VIF Analysis
| Indicator | VIF | The result | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust | BI1 | 1.562 | meeting the requirement |
| Loyalty | BI2 | 1.259 | meeting the requirement |
| Coordination | BI3 | 1.45 | meeting the requirement |
| Information Exchange | BI4 | 1.348 | meeting the requirement |
| Intelligence | IOSA2 | 1.351 | meeting the requirement |
| Mutual Dependence | IOSA3 | 1.295 | meeting the requirement |
| Transparency | IOSA4 | 1.512 | meeting the requirement |
| Collaboration | IOSA5 | 1.292 | meeting the requirement |
| Flexibility | SCP1 | 1.319 | meeting the requirement |
| Efficiency | SCP2 | 1.374 | meeting the requirement |
| Delivery Time | SCP3 | 1.335 | meeting the requirement |
4.3.2. Model Fit Assessment
| SSO | SSE | Q² = 1- SSE/SSO | |
| B2B | 280 | 222.749 | 0.204 |
| SCP | 210 | 168.652 | 0.197 |
Path Coefficient Analysis
- IOS Adoption ' (β=0.380): This beta coefficient represents the standardized effect size of 'IOS Adoption ' on 'SCP'. A beta coefficient of 0.380 indicates that a one-unit increase in 'IOS Adoption ' is associated with a 0.380 standard deviation increase in 'SCP'.
- B2B Integration' (β=0.303): This beta coefficient represents the standardized effect size of 'B2B Integration' on 'SCP'. A beta coefficient of 0.303 indicates that a one-unit increase in 'B2B Integration' is associated with a 0.303 standard deviation increase in 'SCP'.
| Relationship | Coefficient (Original Sample) | Standard Deviation | T-statistics | P values | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IOS Adoption → Supply Chain Performance | 0.380 | 0.110 | 3.443 | 0.001 | H1 is supported |
| IOS Adoption → B2B Integration | 0.636 | 0.072 | 8.877 | 0.000 | H2 is supported |
| B2B Integration → Supply Chain Performance | 0.303 | 0.129 | 2.354 | 0.019 | H3 is supported |
| IOS Adoption → B2B Integration → Supply Chain Performance | 0.193 | 0.081 | 2.374 | 0.018 | H4 is supported |
- IOS Adoption also has a statistically significant positive impact on 'SCP' (β=0.380, t=3.443, p=0.001), supporting Hypothesis 1 (H1).
- IOS Adoption has a statistically significant positive impact on 'B2B Integration' (β=0.636, t=8.877, p=0.000), supporting Hypothesis 2 (H2).
- B2B Integration' has a statistically significant positive impact on 'SCP' (β=0.303, t=2.354, p=0.019), supporting Hypothesis 3 (H3).
- Mediation effect (indirect effect): IOS Adoption ' has a statistically significant positive impact on 'B2B Integration’ and 'SCP' (β=0.193, t=2.374, p=0.018). This mediation effect supports Hypothesis 4 (H4).
5. Discussion
5.1. Theoretical Contribution
5.2. Practical Implications
- Automated Ordering Systems: Establishing IOS-enabled automatic inventory monitoring and replenishment between suppliers and distributors can significantly reduce stockouts and overstock situations, improving operational efficiency.
- Digital Invoice and Payment Processing: Implementing B2B platforms for electronic invoicing and payment can shorten payment cycles, minimize manual errors, and enhance financial transparency among partners.
- ERP-B2B Integration: Linking internal ERP systems with external B2B platforms allows real-time visibility of orders, shipments, and inventory levels, enabling better coordination across departments and supply chain partners.
- Data Analytics for Demand Forecasting: Sharing sales and inventory data via IOS can empower firms to analyze customer demand patterns collaboratively, leading to optimized inventory levels and distribution planning.
- Online Customer and Partner Support Portals: Creating digital platforms integrated with B2B systems to provide real-time communication, issue resolution, and service tracking improves relationships and trust with supply chain partners and customers alike.
6. Conclusion
7. Future Research Directions
Acknowledgment
References
- Abou, E. E., Osman, I. E., and Awaad, S. M. (2023). Antecedents and enablers of inter-organizational systems on Firm Performance: The Mediation Effect of Supply Chain Capabilities. In Asian Journal of Social Science and Management Technology (Vol. 5, Issue 1). www.ajssmt.com.
- Achetoui, Z., Mabrouki, C., and Mousrij, A. (2019a). A review of spare parts supply chain management. Jurnal Sistem Dan Manajemen Industri, 3(2), 67. [CrossRef]
- Achetoui, Z., Mabrouki, C., and Mousrij, A. (2019b). Performance Measurement System for Automotive Spare Parts Supply Chain: A Categorization. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 31–50. [CrossRef]
- Al Mahdy, S. M., Khodeir, L. M., and Gadelhak, M. I. (2025). Investigating organizational agility in Egyptian architecture firms. HBRC Journal, 21(1), 1–36. [CrossRef]
- Alavi, S. N. Alavi, S. N., Abdolvand, N., Harandi, S. R., and Alavi, S. N. (2020). A model for studying the value of the inter-organisational information systems’ implementation-case study: tourism industry. In Int. J. Networking and Virtual Organisations (Vol. 23, Issue 2).
- Al-Doori, J. A. (2019). The impact of supply chain collaboration on performance in automotive industry: Empirical evidence. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 12(2), 241–253. [CrossRef]
- Anwar, M. F. A. (2022). The Influence of Inter-Organizational System Use and Supply Chain Capabilities on Supply Chain Performance. South Asian Journal of Operations and Logistics, 20–38. [CrossRef]
- Asamoah, D., Agyei-Owusu, B., Andoh-Baidoo, F. K., and Ayaburi, E. (2021a). Inter-organizational systems use and supply chain performance: Mediating role of supply chain management capabilities. International Journal of Information Management, 58. [CrossRef]
- Asamoah, D., Agyei-Owusu, B., Andoh-Baidoo, F. K., and Ayaburi, E. (2021b). Inter-organizational systems use and supply chain performance: Mediating role of supply chain management capabilities. International Journal of Information Management, 58. [CrossRef]
- Asamoah, D., Agyei-Owusu, B., Kofi Andoh-Baidoo, F., Ayaburi, E., and Effect, E. A. (2019). Effect of Inter-Organizational Systems Use on Supply Chain Capabilities and Performance. 293–308. [CrossRef]
- Baah, C., Opoku Agyeman, D., Acquah, I. S. K., Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Afum, E., Issau, K., Ofori, D., and Faibil, D. (2022). Effect of information sharing in supply chains: understanding the roles of supply chain visibility, agility, collaboration on supply chain performance. Benchmarking, 29(2), 434–455. [CrossRef]
- Bone, S. A., Fombelle, P. W., Ray, K. R., and Lemon, K. N. (2015). How Customer Participation in B2B Peer-to-Peer Problem-Solving Communities Influences the Need for Traditional Customer Service. Journal of Service Research, 18(1), 23–38. [CrossRef]
- Cannavale, C., Esempio Tammaro, A., Leone, D., and Schiavone, F. (2022). Innovation adoption in inter-organizational healthcare networks – the role of artificial intelligence. In European Journal of Innovation Management (Vol. 25, Issue 6, pp. 758–774). Emerald Group Holdings Ltd. [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y. C., Hu, L. T., Tseng, K. C., Juang, W. J., and Chang, C. K. (2019). Cross-boundary e-government systems: Determinants of performance. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 449–459. [CrossRef]
- Cho, B., Ryoo, S. Y., and Kim, K. K. (2017). Interorganizational dependence, information transparency in interorganizational information systems, and supply chain performance. European Journal of Information Systems, 26(2), 185–205. [CrossRef]
- Chohan, A., Hussain, G., & Shafique, I. (2023). Does social capital affect supply chain performance? Establishing an underlying mechanism and a boundary condition. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73(9), 423–439.
- da Silva, R. M., Tarigan, Z. J. H., and Siagian, H. (2024). The influence of supplier competency on business performance through supplier integration, vendor-managed inventory, and supply chain collaboration in Fuel Station: An evidence from Timor Leste. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(1), 207–220. [CrossRef]
- de Mattos, C. A., and Laurindo, F. J. B. (2017). Information technology adoption and assimilation: Focus on the suppliers portal. Computers in Industry, 85, 48–57. [CrossRef]
- Dehalwar, K., Shashikant, and, and Sharma, N. (2024). Exploring the Distinctions between Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods. 27(7). [CrossRef]
- Delic, M., and Eyers, D. (2020). The effect of Additive Manufacturing adoption on supply chain flexibility and performance: an empirical analysis from the automotive industry.
- DeLone, W., McLean, E., and Sedera, D. (2022). Future of information systems success: Opportunities and challenges. In Computing Handbook: Two-Volume Set (pp. 1–19). CRC Press. [CrossRef]
- Dwaikat, N. (2023), The impact of job stress and job satisfaction on employee performance: The case of the Software Companies in Palestine, An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities), Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 775-803. [CrossRef]
- Eggert, A., and Serdaroglu, M. (2011). Exploring the impact of sales technology on salesperson performance: A task-based approach. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 169–186. [CrossRef]
- Filosa, C., Jovanovic, M., Agostini, L., and Nosella, A. (2025). Pivoting B2B platform business models: From platform experimentation to multi-platform integration to ecosystem envelopment. International Journal of Production Economics, 280. [CrossRef]
- Goktas, P., and Dirsehan, T. (2024). Using PLS-SEM and XAI for casual-predictive services marketing research. Journal of Services Marketing. [CrossRef]
- Gupta, S., Drave, V. A., Bag, S., and Luo, Z. (2019). Leveraging Smart Supply Chain and Information System Agility for Supply Chain Flexibility. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(3), 547–564. [CrossRef]
- Haghkhah, A., Rasoolimanesh, S. M., and Asgari, A. A. (2020). mrp.ase.ro Effects of customer value and service quality on customer loyalty: the mediation role of trust and commitment in a business-to-business context.
- Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., and Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. In European Business Review (Vol. 31, Issue 1, pp. 2–24). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., and Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. [CrossRef]
- Hernández, M. S. (2023). Beliefs and attitudes of canarians towards the chilean linguistic variety. Lenguas Modernas, 62, 183–209. [CrossRef]
- Hossain, M. A., Islam, S., Rahman, M. M., and Arif, N. U. M. (2024). Impact of Online Payment Systems on Customer Trust and Loyalty in E-Commerce Analyzing Security and Convenience. Academic Journal on Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education, 4(3), 1–15. [CrossRef]
- Jia, F. (Jeff), Seuring, S., Chen, L., and Azadegan, A. (2024). Guest editorial: Supply chain transparency: opportunities, challenges and risks. In International Journal of Operations and Production Management (Vol. 44, Issue 9, pp. 1525–1538). Emerald Publishing. [CrossRef]
- Kain, R., and Verma, A. (2018). Logistics Management in Supply Chain - An Overview. Materials Today: Proceedings, 5(2), 3811–3816. [CrossRef]
- Kim, J. W., Rhee, J. H., and Park, C. H. (2024). How Does Digital Transformation Improve Supply Chain Performance: A Manufacturer’s Perspective? Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(7). [CrossRef]
- Kosaka, M., Wu, J., Ke, ·, Shiyong, X. ·, and Editors, Z. (2021). Business Innovation with New ICT in the Asia-Pacific: Case Studies.
- Kowalkowski, C., and Ulaga, W. (2024). Subscription offers in business-to-business markets: Conceptualization, taxonomy, and framework for growth. Industrial Marketing Management, 117, 440–456. [CrossRef]
- Kurnia, S., Parker, C., Ali, M., and Karnali, R. (2019). The impact of multilevel contextual factors on is adoption at the inter-organizational level. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 44(1), 421–459. [CrossRef]
- Lambert, D. M., and Enz, M. G. (2017). Issues in Supply Chain Management: Progress and potential. Industrial Marketing Management, 62, 1–16. [CrossRef]
- Lee, H., Kim, M. S., and Kim, K. K. (2014a). Interorganizational information systems visibility and supply chain performance. International Journal of Information Management, 34(2), 285–295. [CrossRef]
- Lee, H., Kim, M. S., and Kim, K. K. (2014b). Interorganizational information systems visibility and supply chain performance. International Journal of Information Management, 34(2), 285–295. [CrossRef]
- Leppikorpi, T. (2018). Utilizing information systems in inter-organizational collaboration and information sharing.
- Lim, W. M., and Koay, K. Y. (2024). So, you want to publish in a premier journal? An illustrative guide on how to develop and write a quantitative research paper for premier journals. In Global Business and Organizational Excellence (Vol. 43, Issue 3, pp. 5–19). John Wiley and Sons Inc. [CrossRef]
- Loro, C., and Mangiaracina, R. (2022). The impact of e-marketplace on the B2b relationships. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 122(1), 37–54. [CrossRef]
- Mahdi, S., Ratnasari, D., Purwani, S., Herawati, T., Budiono, R., Subartini, B., and Sukono, S. (2024). Analysis of Factors Affecting Barriers to Learning English for Students Using SEM-PLS. International Journal of Instruction, 17(2), 419–438. [CrossRef]
- Mittal, V., Han, K., Lee, J. Y., and Sridhar, S. (2021). Improving Business-to-Business Customer Satisfaction Programs: Assessment of Asymmetry, Heterogeneity, and Financial Impact. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(4), 615–643. [CrossRef]
- Mittal, V., and Sridhar, S. (2020). Customer based execution and strategy: Enhancing the relevance and utilization of B2B scholarship in the C-suite. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 396–409. [CrossRef]
- Mukhamedjanova, K. A. (2020). Concept of supply chain management. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(2), 759–766. [CrossRef]
- Radhakrishnan, A., Davis, J. S., Sridharan, S. V., Moore, D. W., and David, D. (2018). The impact of inter-organizational information systems-enabled external integration on capabilities of buyer–supplier dyads. European Management Journal, 36(4), 558–572. [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M. S., Gani, M. O., Fatema, B., and Takahashi, Y. (2023). B2B firms’ supply chain resilience orientation in achieving sustainable supply chain performance. Sustainable Manufacturing and Service Economics, 2, 100011. [CrossRef]
- Ramos, E., Pettit, T. J., Flanigan, M., Romero, L., and Huayta, K. (2020). Inventory Management Model Based on Lean Supply Chain to Increase the Service Level in a Distributor of Automotive Sector. In Int. J Sup. Chain. Mgt (Vol. 9, Issue 2).
- Richey, R. G., Roath, A. S., Adams, F. G., and Wieland, A. (2022). A Responsiveness View of logistics and supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 43(1), 62–91. [CrossRef]
- Saani, J. I. (2019). Management Information Systems. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340647719.
- Somapa, S., Cools, M., and Dullaert, W. (2018). Characterizing supply chain visibility – A literature review. International Journal of Logistics Management, 29(1), 308–339. [CrossRef]
- Soumena, F. Y., Afifah, N., Amanah, I. N., and Julian, A. (2024). Business to Business (B2B) Model from an Islamic Economic Perspective. In JIEP: Journal of Islamic Economics and Philanthropy (Vol. 6, Issue 4). https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/JIEP/index.
- Sundram, V. P. K., Chhetri, P., and Bahrin, A. S. (2020). The Consequences of Information Technology, Information Sharing and Supply Chain Integration, towards Supply Chain Performance and Firm Performance. Journal of International Logistics and Trade, 18(1), 15–31. [CrossRef]
- Tsou, H. T., Chen, J. S., and Wang, Z. Q. (2019). Partner Selection, Interorganizational Coordination, and New Service Development Success in the Financial Service Industry. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 36(2), 231–247. [CrossRef]
- Tsuguio, M., #1, O., and Fernandes, M. E. (2019). Electronic Data Interchange (EDI): An Interorganizational System Applied in the Auto Parts Industry Supply Chain. In Int. J Sup. Chain. Mgt (Vol. 8, Issue 6). http://excelingtech.co.uk/.
- Turban, E., King, D., Lee, J. K., Liang, T.-P., and Turban, D. C. (2015). Business-to-Business E-Commerce (pp. 161–207). [CrossRef]
- Patanjal Kumar, D., Sharma, D., & Pandey, P. (2023). Coordination mechanisms for digital and sustainable textile supply chain. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(6), 650–667.
- P Vern, A Panghal, RS Mor, V Kumar, D Sarwar.Unlocking the Potential: Leveraging Blockchain Technology for Agri-Food Supply Chain Performance and Sustainability. (2024).
- Veronesi, L. (2017). How B2B Integration Drives Superior Supply Chain Performance.
- Vukovi´c, M. (2024). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM comparison in estimating the predictors of investment intention. Croatian Operational Research Review, 15(2), 131–144. [CrossRef]
- Widowati, D., Darasih, R., and Ramadhani, N. (2022, January 21). Mediation Role of Service Capabilities in Supply Chain Integration on Supply Chain Performance in Small and Medium Enterprises. [CrossRef]
- Yasmin, G. (2023) Supply Chain Management: Ensuring Seamless Operations.
- Zhang, Q., and Cao, M. (2017). Exploring Antecedents of Supply Chain Collaboration: Effects of Culture and Interorganizational System Appropriation.
- Zhou, J., Xu, T., Chiao, Y., and Fang, Y. (2024). Interorganizational Systems and Supply Chain Agility in Uncertain Environments: The Mediation Role of Supply Chain Collaboration. Information Systems Research, 35(1), 184–202. [CrossRef]
- Stroumpoulis, A., Kopanaki, E., & Chountalas, P. T. (2024). Enhancing Sustainable Supply Chain Management through Digital Transformation: A Comparative Case Study Analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(16). [CrossRef]
- Stroumpoulis, A., Kopanaki, E., & Karaganis, G. (2021). Examining the relationship between information systems, sustainable scm, and competitive advantage. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(21). [CrossRef]


Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
