Submitted:
28 November 2025
Posted:
01 December 2025
Read the latest preprint version here
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- SEM: images were acquired at an accelerating voltage of 3 kV.
- AFM: Surface morphology measurements were performed in semi-contact (tapping) mode using standard NSG10 cantilevers (TipsNano, Russia) with a probe tip radius of 10 nm.
- Raman spectroscopy: Spectra were acquired using a green laser with a wavelength of 532 nm (2.33 eV). The diameter of the focused laser beam was 0.5 µm.
- XRD: Spectra were acquired using following parameters: Radiation – Cu Kα (λ= 1.5406 Å); Operating conditions: 40 kV, 40 mA; Scan range: 3-60° 2θ; Scan rate: 2o/min; Step size: 0.02o.
3. Results
3.1. Morphological and Structural Analysis
3.2. Elemental Composition
3.3. X-Ray Diffraction Analysis
3.4. Surface Topography and Flake Thickness
3.5. Raman Spectroscopy
3.5.1. Spatial Mapping of Structural Properties
3.6. Electrical Transport Properties
- The formation of a highly conductive network occurs under minimal technological impact;
- The turbostratic graphene flakes possess a pronounced ability for self-assembly into packed structures;
- An effective contact area between particles is achieved at relatively low pressure.
4. Discussion
4.1. Model of Structural Transformation
4.2. Resolution of Key Contradictions Within the Turbostratic Graphene Model
4.3. Spatial Structural Inhomogeneity by Raman Mapping
4.4. Evolution of the Electrical Conductivity Mechanism
- The formation of a highly conductive network occurs with minimal technological intervention;
- The turbostratic graphene flakes possess a pronounced ability for self-packing;
- An effective contact area between particles is achieved at relatively low pressure.
4.5. Correlation of Morphological Parameters
4.6. Comparison of Turbostratic Graphene Production Methods
5. Conclusions
- This work demonstrates that fast Joule heating induces a fundamental structural rearrangement of amorphous carbon, leading to the formation of large hexagonal domains with sizes >1 µm. with thicknesses ranging from a few nanometers to 200 nm, while XRD revealed coherent domains of ~18 layers, confirming the turbostratic nature.
- The combined analysis of Raman spectroscopy and AFM data identified the material as turbostratic graphene. This is indicated by the combination of significant particle thickness and Raman spectral characteristics typical of few-layer graphene (minimal D-band intensity, narrow symmetric 2D-peak with I2D/IG>2.5), which is explained by the weakened interlayer interaction due to chaotic angular orientation of the layers.
- The formation of a mosaic heterostructure with domain sizes >1 µm was clearly demonstrated using Raman mapping.
- The resistivity of pressed pellets of the synthesized material was found to be as low as 0.51 Ω·cm. This indicates the formation of a dense conductive network with minimal contact resistance between individual graphene domains during pellet formation.
Outlook for Future Work
6. Patents
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| AFM | Atomic force microscopy |
| SEM | Scanning electron microscopy |
| EDS | Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy |
| XRD | X-ray diffraction |
| FWHM | Full width at half maximum |
| fJH | Fast Joule heating or rapid Joule heating |
| FJH | Flash Joule heating |
| DC-LPJH | Direct current long pulse joule heating |
References
- Geim, A.K.; Novoselov, K.S. The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madurani, K.A.; Suprapto, S.; Machrita, N.I.; Bahar, S.L.; Illiya, W.; Kurniawan, F. Progress in Graphene Synthesis and its Application: History, Challenge and the Future Outlook for Research and Industry. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2020, 9, 093013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Y.; Ji, H.; Cheng, H.M.; Ruoff, R.S. Mass production and industrial applications of graphene materials. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2018, 5, 90–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urade, A.R.; Lahiri, I.; Suresh, K.S. Graphene Properties, Synthesis and Applications: A Review. JOM 2022, 75, 614–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Yi, Y.; Yang, H.; Cheng, S.; Yang, W.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Z.; Li, J. Active tunable terahertz bandwidth absorber based on single layer graphene. Commun. Theor. Phys. 2023, 75, 045503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, S.; Zhao, J.; Hu, Z.; Zheng, L.; Zhai, S.; Wei, L.; Liu, X.; Wang, L. Three-dimensional porous carbon-supported Co/Fe bimetallic nanoparticles derived from carboxymethyl cellulose for enhanced supercapacitor electrodes. J. Alloys Compd. 2024, 1003, 175747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahoo, B.B.; Kumar, N.; Panda, H.S.; Panigrahy, B.; Sahoo, N.K.; Soam, A.; Parida, S.; Parashar, S.K.S. Self-assembled 3D graphene-based aerogel with Au nanoparticles as high-performance supercapacitor electrode. J. Energy Storage 2021, 43, 103157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, P.; Jian, M.; Wu, M.; Zhang, C.; Zhou, C.; Ling, X.; Yi, Z.; Li, H.; Yao, W.; Wu, P. Highly sandwich-structured silver nanowire hybrid transparent conductive films for flexible transparent heater applications. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2022, 159, 106998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, K.; Shi, L.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Z. Scalable chemical-vapour-deposition growth of three-dimensional graphene materials towards energy-related applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 3018–3036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shih, M.H.; Lin, Z.; Lin, W.; Xu, K.; Chen, Y.H.; Chen, J.C. Toward large-scale CVD graphene growth by enhancing reaction kinetics via an efficient interdiffusion mediator and mechanism study utilizing CFD simulations. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2021, 128, 400–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Wu, L.; Yu, X.; Peng, H.; Xu, S.; Zhou, Z. In-Situ Growth of Graphene Films to Improve Sensing Performances. Materials 2022, 15, 7814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmood, F.; Mbeugang, C.F.M.; Asghar, F.; Xie, X.; Lin, D.; Liu, D.; Sharma, A.; Chen, J.; Liu, B. Understanding the Synthesis of Turbostratic/Flash Graphene via Joule Heating. Materials 2025, 18, 2892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandit, N.; Keshri, S.; Singh, P.; Singh, T.N.; Keshri, A.K. Ultra-Fast and Facile Fabrication of Turbostratic Holey Graphene and Its Supercapacitor Applications. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2025, 8, 6052–6062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sukasem, W.; Janphuang, N.; Chueangam, W.; Srisom, K.; Rueangwittayanon, A.; Rittihong, U.; Tunmee, S.; Chanlek, N.; Pornsetmetakul, P.; Wirojsirasak, W.; et al. Synthesis of Turbostratic Graphene Derived from Biomass Waste Using Long Pulse Joule Heating Technique. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luong, D.X.; Bets, K.V.; Algozeeb, W.A.; Stanford, M.G.; Kittrell, C.; Chen, W.; Salvatierra, R.V.; Ren, M.; McHugh, E.A.; Advincula, P.A.; et al. Gram-scale bottom-up flash graphene synthesis. Nature 2020, 577, 647–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, J.; Wan, W.; Chen, X.; Zheng, Q. Preparation and structural characterization of graphene by rice husk. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2015, 31, 288–294. [Google Scholar]
- Advincula, P.A.; Luong, D.X.; Chen, W.; Raghuraman, S.; Shahsavari, R.; Tour, J.M. Flash graphene from rubber waste. Carbon 2021, 178, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Algozeeb, W.A.; Savas, P.E.; Luong, D.X.; Chen, W.; Kittrell, C.; Bhat, M.; Shahsavari, R.; Tour, J.M. Flash Graphene from Plastic Waste. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 15595–15604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hosny, M.; Elbay, A.S.; Abdelfatah, A.M.; El-Maghrabi, N.; Fawzy, M. Recent trends in transforming different waste materials into graphene via Flash Joule Heating. Environ. Res. 2025, 270, 121033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prokopiev, A.R.; Loskin, N.N.; Popov, D.N. Fast Joule heating for the synthesis of graphene-containing powders from plastic waste. RENSIT 2025, 17, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, G.; Wang, H.; Zhang, C. From amorphous carbon to turbostratic graphene: A temperature-dependent evolution study via in-situ XRD. Carbon 2020, 167, 244–252. [Google Scholar]
- Klug, H.P.; Alexander, L.E. X-ray Diffraction Procedures: For Polycrystalline and Amorphous Materials; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Chen, W.; Liu, J.; Zhou, M. Gram-Scale Synthesis of Turbostratic Graphene. Carbon 2020, 165, 112–122. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, J.T.; Johnson, L.M. Decoding the X-ray diffraction patterns of disordered carbons: A comparative study of amorphous, turbostratic, and graphitic phases. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 6789–6800. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Z.Q.; Lu, C.J.; Xia, Z.P.; Zhou, Y.; Luo, Z. X-ray diffraction patterns of graphite and turbostratic carbon. Carbon 2007, 45, 1686–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, P.Y.; Ruiz-Vargas, C.S.; van der Zande, A.M.; Whitney, W.S.; Levendorf, M.P.; Kevek, J.W.; Garg, S.; Alden, J.S.; Hustedt, C.J.; Zhu, Y.; et al. Grains and grain boundaries in single-layer graphene atomic patchwork quilts. Nature 2011, 469, 389–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pimenta, M.A.; Dresselhaus, G.; Dresselhaus, M.S.; Cançado, L.G.; Jorio, A.; Saito, R. Studying disorder in graphite-based systems by Raman spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 1276–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrari, A.C.; Robertson, J. Interpretation of Raman spectra of disordered and amorphous carbon. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 61, 14095–14107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cançado, L.G.; Takai, K.; Enoki, T.; Endo, M.; Kim, Y.A.; Mizusaki, H.; Jorio, A.; Pimenta, M.A. General equation for the determination of the crystallite size La of nanographite by Raman spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 163106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrari, A.C.; Basko, D.M. Raman spectroscopy as a versatile tool for studying the properties of graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Ni, Z.; Wang, Z.; Wang, R.; Koo, C.K.; Shen, Z.; Thong, J.T. Probing Layer Number and Stacking Order of Few-Layer Graphene by Raman Spectroscopy. Small 2010, 6, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Phurida, K.; Piyaporn, S.; Akkawat, R. Growth of High-Purity and High-Quality Turbostratic Graphene with Different Inter-layer Spacings. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 4010–4018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohapatra, A.; Poudyal, S.; Ramachandra Rao, M.S.; Jaiswal, M. Resonance Raman spectroscopy of twisted interfaces in turbostratic multilayer graphene. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2024, 36, 205703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, J.B.; Lin, M.L.; Cong, X.; Liu, H.N.; Tan, P.H. Raman spectroscopy of graphene-based materials and its applications in related devices. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 1822–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eckmann, A.; Felten, A.; Mishchenko, A.; Britnell, L.; Krupke, R.; Novoselov, K.S.; Casiraghi, C. Probing the Nature of Defects in Graphene by Raman Spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 3925–3930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Street, R.A. Electronic Processes in Noncrystalline Materials. Phys. Bull. 1973, 24, 301–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joung, D.; Khondaker, S.I. Efros-Shklovskii variable-range hopping in reduced graphene oxide sheets of varying carbon sp2 fraction. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 86, 235423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masashi, T.; Sarayut, T.; Ukit, R.; Chanan, E.; Ratchadaporn, S.; Nakajima, H.; et al. Electrical Conduction Properties of Hydrogenated Amorphous Carbon Films with Different Structures. Materials 2021, 14, 2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Chai, J.; Du, J.; Li, Z. A comprehensive review of various carbonaceous materials for anodes in lithium-ion batteries. Dalton Trans. 2024, 53, 4900–4921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sriram, G.; Dhanabalan, K.; Oh, T.H. Recent advances in the synthesis of reduced graphene oxide and its composites with metal oxides as electrode materials for supercapacitors: A review. J. Energy Storage 2025, 137, 118566, 137:118566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gusain, M.; Sindhu, M.; Tewary, A. Advanced carbon nanomaterials for high-performance energy storage technologies. Next Nanotechnol. 2025, 8, 100283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watcharamaisakul, S.; Iamthang, N.; Chueangam, W.; Srisom, K.; Rueangwittayanon, A.; Rittihong, U.; Tunmee, S.; Chanlek, N.; Pornsetmetakul, P.; Wirojsirasak, W.; et al. Synthesis of Turbostratic Graphene Derived from Biomass Waste Using Long Pulse Joule Heating Technique. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kokmat, P.; Surinlert, P.; Ruammaitree, A. Growth of high-purity and high-quality turbostratic graphene with different interlayer spacings. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 4010–4018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goldstein, J.I.; Newbury, D.E.; Michael, J.R.; Ritchie, N.W.M.; Scott, J.H.J.; Joy, D.C. Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis. Springer: 2017. [CrossRef]
- Chacón-Torres, J.C.; Wirtz, L.; Pichler, T. Raman spectroscopy of turbostratic graphene. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 075424. [Google Scholar]
- Mott, N.F.; Davis, E.A. Electronic Processes in Non-Crystalline Materials. Oxford University Press: 1971.
- Chen, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, H.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y. Commercial carbon additives for lithium-ion batteries: A comprehensive performance comparison. J. Power Sources 2023, 580, 233415. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; Yao, Y.; Li, H.; Yang, S.; Chen, W. Recent advances in the synthesis and applications of reduced graphene oxide in energy storage. Carbon Energy 2022, 4, 231–248. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, L.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, M.; Chen, Z. Hybrid carbon nanomaterials for advanced electrochemical energy storage. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2208956. [Google Scholar]







| Samples | C, at. % | O, at. % | O/С | R (ends of the electrodes), Ω |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial activated charcoal | ~95.0±0.5 | ~5.0±0.5 | 0,052 | ~4-6±0.2 |
| Activated charcoal after fJH | ~98,5±0.5 | ~1.5±0.5 | 0,015 | ~1-1.5±0.2 |
| Parameter | Pristine graphite (HOPG) [22] | Turbostratic graphene [15,23] | This work |
|---|---|---|---|
| (002) peak | ~26.5o d = ~0.335 nm |
Shifted downwards: 25.5o - 26.2o d = 0.340-0.349 nm |
~25.95o Wide, intense |
| (100) / (101) peak | ~42.3o | ~42-43o | ~42.72o (small, wide) |
| (004) peak | ~54.5o | ~53-54o | ~53.96o (small) |
| La, AFM (µm) | La, SEM (µm) | FWHM (G), cm–1 | FWHM (2D), cm–1 | ID/IG | I2D/IG | La, Raman (µm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≥ 1 | ≥ 1.5 | 16 | 20 | n/d | ≤2.5 | - |
| ≤ 0.8 | ≤ 0.7 | 22 | 31 | ≥0.04 | ≤1.5 | ≥0.45 |
| ≤ 0.2 | ≤ 0.3 | 29 | 45 | ≤0.2 | ≤0.8 | ≤0.13 |
| Feature | [15] | [42] | This work |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon Precursor | Various carbon sources (coal, petroleum coke, biochar, plastics, etc.) | Biomass | Activated charcoal |
| Process | Flash Joule Heating (FJH) | Direct Current Long Pulse Joule Heating (DC-LPJH) | Fast Joule Heating (fJH) |
| Energy Requirement | ~7.2 kJ/g | 10 kJ/g | ~16.2 kJ/g |
| Graphene Type | Turbostratic graphene | Turbostratic graphene | Turbostratic graphene |
| Raman Spectroscopy | I2D/IG ≤ 17 | I2D/IG ≤ 1.2 | I2D/IG ≤ 2.5 |
| Interlayer distance (XRD) | 3.45 Å | - | 3.436 Å |
| Domain size | <100 nm | - | > 1 um |
| Environmental Impact | Sustainable, no solvents required | Sustainable, no solvents required, reduces biomass waste | Sustainable, no solvents required, reduces biomass waste |
| Potential Applications | Composite materials | Composite materials | Energy storage devices, composite materials |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).