Submitted:
21 November 2025
Posted:
24 November 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
The Yanfu Temple in Wuyi County is one of the few Yuan Dynasty wooden structures in Jiangnan, which is representative in the history of architecture. Based on the proportionality of each structural parameter of the building, the Yingzao chi (Construction ruler) was calculated to be 315. 48 mm, using the large and small rulers system that has been used since the Tang and Song dynasties. It did not adopt the cai-fen system of the Yingzao Fashi (The Methodology of Official Architecture in the Northern Song Dynasty), but instead used the architectural module system. This modulus is a series modulus, very similar to the modern building modulus.
Keywords:
1. Overview and Existing Research
2. Yingzao chi (Construction Ruler)
2.1. Length of a Ruler in the Yuan Dynasty
2.2. The System of Large and Small Ruler
2.3. Column Head Plan and Yingzao chi
2.4. Architectural Module
3. Cai (Similar to Dimension Lumber) and Puzuo (Bracket Set)
3.1. Cai
3.2. Dou (Bearing Block)
3.3. Parameters of Gong (Bracketarm) and Puzuo
4. Segments of Height
4.1. Column
4.2. Height of Wu Ju (Ridged Purlin) and Puzuo (Bracket Set)
4.3. Computational Modeling of Curved Roof Polylines
5. Rafters and Profile Parameters
5.1. Rafters
5.2. Principal Ridge (Zhengji) and Profile Parameters
6. Summary
Funding
Ethical Approval
Informed Consent
Data Availability
References
- Huang Zi, editor. Yuan Dynasty Timber Architecture: Yanfu Temple. Compiled by Zhejiang Ancient Architecture Design and Research Institute. Beijing: Cultural Relics Press, 2013.
- Zhang Yaxuan. "An Analysis of the Architectural Framework of the Main Hall of Yanfu Temple in Wuyi. " Traditional Chinese Architecture and Gardens Technology, no. 2 (2020): 14–21.
- Lu Jiaxi, general editor. A History of Science and Technology in China: Volume on Measures and Weights. By Qiu Guangming et al. Beijing: Science Press, 2001.
- Wang Guixiang. Ten Books by Contemporary Chinese Architectural Historians: Wang Guixiang's Selected Essays on Chinese Architectural History. Shenyang: Liaoning Fine Arts Publishing House, 2013.
- Zhang Shiqing. Survey Analysis and Fundamental Research on the Main Hall of Baoguo Temple in Ningbo. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2012.
- Xu Yitao, et al. Architectural Archaeology Research of the Ji King Temple in Wanrong, Shanxi. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2016.
- Shanxi Zhongde Ancient Architecture Planning and Design Institute Co. , Ltd. Completion Report on the Restoration Project of Erxian Temple in Jincheng. Taiyuan: Beiyue Literature and Art Publishing House, 2019.
- Li Huizhi, Zhao Shuguang, and Zheng Linyou. "The Zhenze Erxian Temple in Xixi, Lingchuan, Shanxi. " Cultural Relics Quarterly, no. 2 (1998): 4-13, 15-30.
- Liu Chang, Zhang Rong, and Liu Yu. "Analysis of Architectural Historical Traces of the Rear Hall of Xixi Erxian Temple. " In Architectural History, vol. 11, edited by Wang Guixiang, 119-34. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2008.
- Liang Sicheng and Liu Dunzhen. "Survey Report on Ancient Architecture in Datong. " Bulletin of the Society for Research in Chinese Architecture 3-4 (1934): 1-70.
- Shanxi Zhongde Ancient Architecture Planning and Design Institute Co. , Ltd. Completion Report on the Restoration Project of Tangdi Temple in Dayang. Taiyuan: Beiyue Literature and Art Publishing House, 2019.
- Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China (MOHURD). *GB/T 50002-2013: Standard for Modular Coordination of Buildings*. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2013.









| dynasty | Length ( mm ) | according to |
| Estimated length of ruler in Yuan Dynasty | 307. 2 | Wu Chengluo |
| 306 | Chen Mengjia | |
| 374 | Zeng Wuxiu | |
| 383. 5 | Wen Renjun | |
| 371、395、412. 5 | Guo Zhengzhong | |
| 275 | Guo Zhengzhong | |
| 340 | Yuan Mingsen | |
| Calculated according to the official seal | 338 | Minimum value |
| 356 | Maximum value | |
| 348. 65 | Estimated mean value | |
| Ruler of the Ming Dynasty | 317. 93 | Zhu Zaiyu |
| 319. 04 | 39 complete Ming banknotes in the collection of the Chinese History Museum | |
| 318 | Zhu Zaiyu | |
| 320 | Ming Jiajing chi, handed down through the generations | |
| 318 | Early Ming shipwreck | |
| 320 | Based on the above information | |
| Ruler of the Song Dynasty | 312-316 | According to historical records and the research findings of previous scholars |
| serial number | building | dynasty | length of ruler | length of small cun | vintages | Architectural modulus | remark |
| 1 | Hualin Temple Hall | late Five Dynasties and early Song dynasty (960-1279) | 299. 51mm | 24. 9594mm | 964 A. D. | 1 chi is the base modulus, half a foot is a sub-modulus, and 0. 4 small cun is also a sub-modulus | (Wang 2013) |
| 2 | Ningbo Baoguo Temple Hall | the Northern Song Dynasty | 287mm | Not used | 1013 A. D. | Basic modulus 1 chi | (Zhang 2012) |
| 3 | Shanxi Wanrong Jikwang Temple Hall | the Northern Song Dynasty | 314mm | Not used | 1023 A. D. | Basic modulus 1 chi, expanded modulus 4 chi, 4 cun and 0. 4 cun as sub-modulus | ( (Xu et al. 2016) |
| 4 | The main hall of Jincheng Erxian Temple | the Northern Song Dynasty | 299. 39mm | 24. 95mm | 1097 A. D. -1117 A. D. | Basic modulus 1 chi, 4 small cun and 0. 4 small cun as sub-moduli,expanded modulus 3 chi | (Shanxi Zhongde 2019) |
| 5 | Xixi Erxian Temple Rear Hall | Jin Dynasty | 297. 54mm | 24. 71mm | 1165 A. D. | Basic modulus 1 chi, 4 small cun and 0. 4 small cun as sub-moduli | ( (Li, Zhao, and Zheng 1998, 10)(Liu, Zhang, and Liu 2008, 125) |
| 6 | Haihui Hall of Huayan Temple | Jin Dynasty | 296. 313mm | 24. 69mm | Jin Dynasty | Basic modulus 1 chi, 4 small cun and 0. 4 small cun as sub-moduli | (Liang and Liu 1934, 45) |
| 7 | Shanxi Jincheng Dayang Tang Di Temple Tang Wang Hall | Yuan or Mongol dynasty | 316mm | 26. 33mm | 1344 A. D. | Basic modulus 1 chi, 4 small cun and 0. 4 small cun as sub-moduli | (Shanxi Zhongde 2019a) |
| Calculate Yingzao chi | Verification of the length of the 315. 48 mm chi | fitted value | |||||||
| mm | Assuming a cun. | Calculate the length of the chi | convert to cun | similarity ratio | cun | small cun | 4 small cun multiplier | 0. 4 small cun multiplier | |
| Tong MianKuo | 8200 | 260 | 315. 385 | 259. 921 | 100. 03% | 260 | 312 | 78 | 780 |
| Tong Jinshen | 8340 | 265 | 314. 717 | 264. 359 | 100. 24% | 265 | 318 | 79. 5 | 795 |
| Central bay (facade width) | 4380 | 140 | 312. 857 | 138. 836 | 100. 84% | 140 | 168 | 42 | 420 |
| Secondary bay (facade) | 1910 | 60 | 318. 333 | 60. 543 | 99. 10% | 60 | 72 | 18 | 180 |
| Central bay (depth) | 3560 | 115 | 309. 565 | 112. 844 | 101. 91% | 115 | 138 | 34. 5 | 345 |
| Front secondary bay (depth) | 2870 | 90 | 318. 889 | 90. 972 | 98. 93% | 90 | 108 | 27 | 270 |
| Rear secondary bay (depth) | 1910 | 60 | 318. 333 | 60. 543 | 99. 10% | 60 | 72 | 18 | 180 |
| Total height of the Damuzuo | 8525 | 270 | 315. 741 | 270. 223 | 99. 92% | 270 | 324 | 81 | 810 |
| mean value | 315. 48 | ||||||||
| The chi: 315. 48mm | ||||||||
| Original numbe | Fitting number | |||||||
| mm | Converted to cun | Converted to Small cun | Small cun | cun | 0. 4 small cun multiplier | similarity ratio | ||
| Cai of the text record. | Dangcai | 155 | 4. 913 | 5. 896 | 6 | 5 | 15 | 101. 77% |
| width of Cai | 100 | 3. 170 | 3. 804 | 3. 6 | 3 | 9 | 94. 64% | |
| Qi | 60 | 1. 902 | 2. 282 | 2. 4 | 2 | 6 | 105. 16% | |
| Zucai | 215 | 6. 815 | 8. 178 | 8. 4 | 7 | 21 | 102. 71% | |
| Cai under the Jituan (ridged purlin) | Dangcai | 155 | 4. 913 | 5. 896 | 6 | 5 | 15 | 101. 77% |
| Qi | 60 | 1. 902 | 2. 282 | 2. 4 | 2 | 6 | 105. 16% | |
| Zucai | 215 | 6. 815 | 8. 178 | 8. 4 | 7 | 21 | 102. 71% | |
| Cai for other beam nodes | Dangcai | 150 | 4. 755 | 5. 706 | 6 | 5 | 15 | 105. 16% |
| Qi | 60 | 1. 902 | 2. 282 | 2. 4 | 2 | 6 | 105. 16% | |
| Zucai | 210 | 6. 657 | 7. 988 | 8. 4 | 7 | 21 | 105. 16% | |
| Gong | Width | 95 | 3. 011 | 3. 614 | 3. 6 | 3 | 9 | 99. 63% |
| Gong | Zucai | 215 | 6. 815 | 8. 178 | 8. 4 | 7 | 21 | 102. 71% |
| Gong | Dangcai | 155 | 4. 913 | 5. 896 | 6 | 5 | 15 | 101. 77% |
| Dou | mortise and tenon opening | 100 | 3. 170 | 3. 804 | 3. 6 | 3 | 9 | 94. 64% |
| Tuan (Purlin) and Rafter |
Diameter of Tuan | 230 | 7. 290 | 8. 749 | 8. 8 | 7. 333 | 22 | 100. 59% |
| Timu | 90 | 2. 853 | 3. 423 | 3. 2 | 2. 667 | 8 | 93. 48% | |
| Diameter of rafters | 100 | 3. 170 | 3. 804 | 4 | 3. 333 | 10 | 105. 16% | |
| The chi: 315. 48mm | ||||||||||
| Ludou (the cap block) | Upper width | Lower width | Upper depth | Lower depth | Er | ping | Dou-qi | Qi | Total height | |
| Raw number | mm | 290 | 230 | 290 | 230 | 80 | 35 | 70 | 105 | 185 |
| Converted to cun | 9. 192 | 7. 290 | 9. 192 | 7. 290 | 2. 536 | 1. 109 | 2. 219 | 3. 328 | 5. 864 | |
| Converted to Small cun | 11. 031 | 8. 749 | 11. 031 | 8. 749 | 3. 043 | 1. 331 | 2. 663 | 3. 994 | 7. 037 | |
| fitted value | Small cun | 11. 2 | 8. 8 | 11. 2 | 8. 8 | 3. 2 | 1. 2 | 2. 8 | 4 | 7. 2 |
| 0. 4 small cun multiplier | 28 | 22 | 28 | 22 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 18 | |
| cun | 9. 333 | 7. 333 | 9. 333 | 7. 333 | 2. 667 | 1 | 2. 333 | 3. 333 | 6. 000 | |
| similarity ratio | 101. 53% | 100. 59% | 101. 53% | 100. 59% | 105. 16% | 90. 14% | 105. 16% | 100. 15% | 102. 32% | |
| Jiaohu dou | Upper width | Lower width | Upper depth | Lower depth | Er | ping | Dou-qi | Qi | Total height | |
| Raw number | mm | 195 | 155 | 160 | 120 | 40 | 20 | 40 | 60 | 100 |
| Converted to cun | 6. 181 | 4. 913 | 5. 072 | 3. 804 | 1. 268 | 0. 634 | 1. 268 | 1. 902 | 3. 170 | |
| Converted to Small cun | 7. 417 | 5. 896 | 6. 086 | 4. 564 | 1. 521 | 0. 761 | 1. 521 | 2. 282 | 3. 804 | |
| fitted value | Small cun | 7. 6 | 6 | 6 | 4. 4 | 1. 6 | 0. 8 | 1. 6 | 2. 4 | 4 |
| 0. 4 small cun multiplier | 19 | 15 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
| cun | 6. 333 | 5 | 5. 000 | 3. 667 | 1. 333 | 0. 667 | 1. 333 | 2. 000 | 3. 333 | |
| similarity ratio | 102. 46% | 101. 77% | 98. 59% | 96. 40% | 105. 16% | 105. 16% | 105. 16% | 105. 16% | 105. 16% | |
| Qixin Dou | Upper width | Lower width | Upper depth | Lower depth | Er | ping | Dou-qi | Qi | Total height | |
| Raw number | mm | 150 | 110 | 160 | 120 | 35 | 25 | 35 | 60 | 95 |
| Converted to cun | 4. 755 | 3. 487 | 5. 072 | 3. 804 | 1. 109 | 0. 792 | 1. 109 | 1. 902 | 3. 011 | |
| Converted to Small cun | 5. 706 | 4. 184 | 6. 086 | 4. 564 | 1. 331 | 0. 951 | 1. 331 | 2. 282 | 3. 614 | |
| fitted value | Small cun | 5. 6 | 4 | 6 | 4. 4 | 1. 6 | 0. 8 | 1. 6 | 2. 4 | 3. 6 |
| 0. 4 small cun multiplier | 14 | 10 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 9 | |
| cun | 4. 667 | 3. 333 | 5. 000 | 3. 667 | 1. 333 | 0. 667 | 1. 333 | 2. 000 | 3. 000 | |
| similarity ratio | 98. 15% | 95. 60% | 98. 59% | 96. 40% | 120. 18% | 84. 13% | 120. 18% | 105. 16% | 99. 63% | |
| Sandou | Upper width | Lower width | Upper depth | Lower depth | Er | ping | Dou-qi | Qi | Total height | |
| Raw number | mm | 135 | 95 | 160 | 120 | 35 | 25 | 35 | 60 | 95 |
| Converted to cun | 4. 279 | 3. 011 | 5. 072 | 3. 804 | 1. 109 | 0. 792 | 1. 109 | 1. 902 | 3. 011 | |
| Converted to Small cun | 5. 135 | 3. 614 | 6. 086 | 4. 564 | 1. 331 | 0. 951 | 1. 331 | 2. 282 | 3. 614 | |
| fitted value | Small cun | 5. 2 | 3. 6 | 6 | 4. 4 | 1. 6 | 0. 8 | 1. 6 | 2. 4 | 4 |
| 0. 4 small cun multiplier | 13 | 9 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
| cun | 4. 333 | 3 | 5. 000 | 3. 667 | 1. 333 | 0. 667 | 1. 333 | 2. 000 | 3. 333 | |
| similarity ratio | 101. 27% | 99. 63% | 98. 59% | 96. 40% | 120. 18% | 84. 13% | 120. 18% | 105. 16% | 110. 69% | |
| Pingpan dou | Upper width | Lower width | Upper depth | Lower depth | Er | ping | Dou-qi | Qi | Total height | |
| Raw number | mm | 160 | 120 | 160 | 120 | 25 | 35 | 60 | 60 | |
| Converted to cun | 5. 072 | 3. 804 | 5. 072 | 3. 804 | 0. 792 | 1. 109 | 1. 902 | 1. 902 | ||
| Converted to Small cun | 6. 086 | 4. 564 | 6. 086 | 4. 564 | 0. 951 | 1. 331 | 2. 282 | 2. 282 | ||
| fitted value | Small cun | 6 | 4. 4 | 6 | 4. 4 | 0. 8 | 1. 6 | 2. 4 | 2. 4 | |
| 0. 4 small cun multiplier | 15 | 11 | 15 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 6 | ||
| cun | 5. 000 | 3. 667 | 5. 000 | 3. 667 | 0. 667 | 1. 333 | 2. 000 | 2. 000 | ||
| similarity ratio | 98. 59% | 96. 40% | 98. 59% | 96. 40% | 84. 13% | 120. 18% | 105. 16% | 105. 16% | ||
| The chi: 315. 48mm | ||||||||
| Original numbe | Fitting number | Lower width | ||||||
| mm | Converted to cun | Converted to Small cun | cun | Small cun | 0. 4 small cun multiplier | similarity ratio | Small cun | |
| Hua-gong | 498 | 15. 785 | 18. 943 | 15. 667 | 18. 8 | 47 | 99. 25% | 4. 4 |
| The inner half-length of the second Hua-gong | 378 | 11. 982 | 14. 378 | 12 | 14. 4 | 36 | 100. 15% | 4. 4/2 |
| nidao gong | 686 | 21. 745 | 26. 094 | 22 | 26. 4 | 66 | 101. 17% | 3. 6 |
| Ling gong | 620 | 19. 653 | 23. 583 | 20 | 24 | 60 | 101. 77% | 3. 6 |
| Guazi gong | 420 | 13. 313 | 15. 976 | 13. 333 | 16 | 40 | 100. 15% | 3. 6 |
| Mangong | 660 | 20. 921 | 25. 105 | 21 | 25. 2 | 63 | 100. 38% | 3. 6 |
| Jiaofu gong | 626 | 19. 843 | 23. 811 | 20 | 24 | 60 | 100. 79% | 3. 6 |
| Inward first jump length | 470 | 14. 898 | 17. 878 | 15 | 18 | 45 | 100. 69% | |
| Inward second jump length | 480 | 15. 215 | 18. 258 | 15 | 18 | 45 | 98. 59% | |
| total internal jump | 950 | 30. 113 | 36. 135 | 30 | 36 | 90 | 99. 63% | |
| second outward jump | 420 | 13. 313 | 15. 976 | 13. 333 | 16 | 40 | 100. 15% | |
| Total external jumps (status quo) | 680 | 21. 554 | 25. 865 | 21. 667 | 26 | 65 | 100. 52% | |
| Total outside jump (recovery) | 840 | 26. 626 | 31. 951 | 26. 667 | 32 | 80 | 100. 15% | |
| The chi: 315. 48mm | |||||||
| Original numbe | Fitting number | ||||||
| mm | Converted to cun | Converted to Small cun | cun | Small cun | 0. 4 small cun multiplier | similarity ratio | |
| Net height of eave columns | 4650 | 147. 394 | 176. 873 | 148. 333 | 178 | 445 | 100. 64% |
| Rear Inner column height | 6390 | 202. 548 | 243. 058 | 202. 5 | 243 | 607. 5 | 99. 98% |
| Front Inner column height | 6690 | 212. 058 | 254. 469 | 211. 667 | 254 | 635 | 99. 82% |
| Inner column diameter max | 517 | 16. 388 | 19. 665 | 16. 333 | 19. 6 | 49 | 99. 67% |
| Inner column base diameter | 457 | 14. 486 | 17. 383 | 14. 667 | 17. 6 | 44 | 101. 25% |
| Inner column head diameter | 312 | 9. 890 | 11. 868 | 10 | 12 | 30 | 101. 12% |
| Thickness of the Ordinary Plinth Stone | 150 | 4. 755 | 5. 706 | 5 | 6 | 15 | 105. 16% |
| ground level to the head of the columns | 4820 | 152. 783 | 183. 340 | 153. 333 | 184 | 460 | 100. 36% |
| The chi: 315. 48mm | |||||||||
| Original numbe | Fitting number | Remarks | |||||||
| mm | Converted to cun | Converted to Small cun | cun | Small cun | 0. 4 small cun multiplier | similarity ratio | |||
| high degree | Column head to lower end of liao-yan-fang | 1005 | 31. 856 | 38. 227 | 31. 667 | 38 | 95 | 99. 40% | Status quo |
| Inferior cortex of liao-yan-fang to upper of the ridge | 2700 | 85. 584 | 102. 701 | 85 | 102 | 255 | 99. 32% | Status quo | |
| eave columns | 4820 | 152. 783 | 183. 340 | 153. 333 | 184 | 460 | 100. 36% | Physical object | |
| Column head to liao-yan-fang up | 36. 667 | 44 | 110 | Reasoning | |||||
| Wu Ju | 80 | 96 | 240 | Reasoning | |||||
| total height | 8525 | 270. 223 | 324. 268 | 270 | 324 | 810 | 99. 92% | Physical object | |
| High of Jia dao | Ji bu | 810 | 25. 675 | 30. 810 | 25. 000 | 30 | 75 | 97. 37% | Physical object |
| shang-jin bu | 530 | 16. 800 | 20. 160 | 16. 667 | 20 | 50 | 99. 21% | ||
| xia-jin bu | 420 | 13. 313 | 15. 976 | 13. 333 | 16 | 40 | 100. 15% | ||
| Inner half of Yanbu | 430 | 13. 630 | 16. 356 | 13. 333 | 16 | 40 | 97. 82% | ||
| Outer half of Yanbu | 11. 667 | 14 | 35 | Reasoning | |||||
| Levelling of Jia dao | Ji bu | 1300 | 41. 207 | 49. 448 | 42. 500 | 51 | 127. 5 | 103. 14% | |
| shang-jin bu | 960 | 30. 430 | 36. 516 | 30. 000 | 36 | 90 | 98. 59% | ||
| xia-jin bu | 960 | 30. 430 | 36. 516 | 30. 000 | 36 | 90 | 98. 59% | ||
| Inner half of Yanbu | 950 | 30. 113 | 36. 135 | 30. 000 | 36 | 90 | 99. 63% | ||
| outside jump of Puzuo | 840 | 26. 626 | 31. 951 | 26. 667 | 32 | 80 | 100. 15% | ||
| Yan bu | 1790 | 56. 739 | 68. 087 | 56. 667 | 68 | 170 | 99. 87% | ||
| Tong Jinshen | 8340 | 264. 359 | 317. 231 | 265 | 318 | 795 | 100. 24% | ||
| total horizontal length | 10020 | 317. 611 | 381. 134 | 318. 333 | 382 | 955 | 100. 23% | ||
| Unit: Small cun | |||||||
| Horizontal length | Vertical Height | slope | Proximity ratio | Similar rate | Remarks | ||
| Jia dao | Ji bu | 51 | 30 | 0. 5882 | 10/17 | 100. 00% | |
| shang-jin bu | 36 | 20 | 0. 5556 | 5/9 | 100. 00% | simple whole-number ratios | |
| xia-jin bu | 36 | 16 | 0. 4444 | 4/9 | 100. 00% | ||
| Yanbu | 68 | 30 | 0. 4412 | 4/9 | 99. 26% | ||
| dividing the roof slope into two sections | Ji bu+shang-jin bu | 87 | 50 | 0. 5747 | 4/7 | 100. 57% | simple whole-number ratios |
| xia-jin bu+Yanbu | 104 | 46 | 0. 4423 | 4/9 | 99. 52% | ||
| Using liao-yan-fang as a benchmark | Yanbu | 68 | 30 | 0. 4412 | 4/9 | 99. 26% | simple whole-number ratios |
| xia-jin bu | 104 | 46 | 0. 4423 | 4/9 | 99. 52% | ||
| shang-jin bu | 140 | 66 | 0. 4714 | 33/70 | 100. 00% | ||
| Ji bu | 191 | 96 | 0. 5026 | 1/2 | 100. 52% | ||
| The chi: 315. 48mm | |||||||
| Original numbe | Fitting number | ||||||
| mm | Converted to cun | Converted to Small cun | cun | Small cun | 0. 4 small cun multiplier | similarity ratio | |
| Tong MianKuo | 8200 | 259. 921 | 311. 906 | 260 | 312 | 780 | 100. 03% |
| Central bay (facade width) | 4380 | 138. 836 | 166. 603 | 140 | 168 | 420 | 100. 84% |
| chu ji (Overhanging eaves) | 1650 | 52. 301 | 62. 762 | 51. 667 | 62 | 155 | 98. 79% |
| Principal ridge (Zhengji) | 7680 | 243. 439 | 292. 126 | 243. 333 | 292 | 730 | 99. 96% |
| Head of rafter to centre of column | 2020 | 64. 029 | 76. 835 | 65 | 78 | 195 | 101. 52% |
| east-west rafter head distance | 12240 | 387. 980 | 465. 576 | 390 | 468 | 1170 | 100. 52% |
| north-south rafter head distance | 12380 | 392. 418 | 470. 901 | 395 | 474 | 1185 | 100. 66% |
| Corner Beam is flat out at a 45 degree angle from the column head | 3280 | 103. 969 | 124. 762 | 106. 066 | 127. 279 | 102. 02% | |
| Corner Beam flat out from the column head | 2319. 310 | 73. 517 | 88. 220 | 75 | 90 | 225 | 102. 02% |
| East-West Corner Beam Headspace | 12838. 620 | 406. 955 | 488. 346 | 410 | 492 | 1230 | 100. 75% |
| Tong Jinshen | 8340 | 264. 359 | 317. 231 | 265 | 318 | 795 | 100. 24% |
| North-South Corner Beam Headspace | 12978. 62 | 411. 393 | 493. 671 | 415 | 498 | 1245 | 100. 88% |
| total height | 8520 | 270. 065 | 324. 078 | 270 | 324 | 810 | 99. 98% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).