Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Identification of Risk Factors for Preterm Birth in a Regional Hospital in Northern Region of Sudan—A Prospective Study

Submitted:

30 October 2025

Posted:

03 November 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

Introduction: Preterm birth (PTB) (delivery< 37 completed weeks of gestation) is one of the leading causes of neonatal mortality and morbidity. Its aetiology is multifactorial but is unknown in many cases. Worldwide about 15 million babies are born preterm annually. Rates are higher in low and middle-income countries where several social, environmental and health factors interact. Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with PTB in a metropolitan area of a low middle income country- Sudan. Method: This was a prospective cross-sectional hospital-based study carried out at Omdurman Maternity Hospital over a period of six months on women who received antenatal care and delivered at the hospital over the study period. After delivery, the cohort was then divided into those who delivered preterm and those who delivered at term, and a multivariate analysis performed to identify factors associated with PTB. Those who had elective CS were excluded from the study. Result: A total of 411 women received antenatal care and delivered over the study period and 384 formed the subjects of the study. The PTB rate was 7.4%. Factors identified that were associated with PTB included maternal age <20 years old (P=0.017), low family income (P=0.005), rarely receiving iron and folic acid supplementation (P=0.00001), infrequent antenatal care attendance (P=0.013), poor nutritional status (P=0.0000001), low maternal education (P=0.04) and short inter-pregnancy interval (<6 months) (P=0.04). Other factors included multiple birth (P=0.001), diabetes mellitus (P=0.004), antepartum haemorrhage (P=0.002), hypertension (P=0.004), previous PTB (P=0.0001) and urinary tract infections (P= 0.004). Conclusion: Various sociodemographic factors and complications during pregnancy increased the risk of PTB in this population. To reduce the risk, an interdisciplinary approach must be adopted. This should tackle factors pre-pregnancy and improve access. Healthcare providers should ensure folate and iron supplementation and identify complications such as diabetes and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy early and manage appropriately.

Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Preterm birth defined as delivery < 37 completed weeks is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality world-wide, accounting for 18% of deaths among children less than 5 years old and 35% of deaths among those aged less than 28 days [1]. The rate PTB varies from country to country with the highest rates in low-income countries and the lowest in high income countries. [2] It is estimated that there are approximately 15million preterm births every year for an average PTB rate of 11% [3]. The rates vary from 5%-9% in high income countries to about 18% in some low-income countries [4,5,6]. In sub-Sahara African the rate of PTB is high being for example 13.3% in Ethiopia [7] and 18.3% in Kenya [8]. In addition to negative health outcomes, the cost of PTB is exorbitant to families, society and governments [9]. The long-term health consequences include chronic lung diseases, cognitive impairment and cardiovascular disease [10].
Increasingly, PTB is not regarded as a single entity, but a complex condition best described as a syndrome caused by an interaction of multiple factors where these are known but in many cases these factors are unknown. There is now an acknowledgement that to better understand its pathophysiology, prevention and management, PTB should be phenotyped based on conditions present in the mother and conditions of the fetus and placenta at the time of birth [11]. Two classical phenotypes have been proposed [12,13]. Prevention of PTB can only be effective if its multifactorial aetiology is better understood.
Although the causes of PTB are known in some cases, they are poorly defined in many cases, but various risk factors have been identified [14]. Most of these risk factors are modifiable [15] and it has been estimated that more than 75% of PTB deaths are preventable without intensive care [16]. In sub-Sahara Africa and some South-East Asia [17,18] with limited resources, therefore a more pragmatic approach to reducing PTB would be identifying the modifiable factors and taking appropriate steps to mitigate them. These factors vary from individual, social and medical, to care provided antenatally. Identification of these factors and addressing them either pre-pregnancy or during pregnancy may significantly reduce the risk of PTB. Some of these factors which if addressed have been shown to reduce the rate of PTB include smoking [10], short interpregnancy intervals, maternal age (<20years and >35 years) [19,20], anaemia, urinary tract infections, previous preterm birth and medical disorders of pregnancy [11,20] and infections [21].
That the WHO and the United Nations' 2010 goal of reducing mortality due to PTB by 50% before 2025 has unfortunately not been achieved in most countries is reflective of failure of multidisciplinary concerted efforts to address modifiable factors that increase the risk of PTB. In Sudan for example, a country that is currently experiencing one of the most destructive civil strife, most studies on PTB have been retrospective and few have investigated modifiable factors such as nutritional status, periodontitis [22] number of antenatal clinical visits and regularity of iron and folate supplementation during pregnancy [23]. In a previous study from Omdurman, Sudan, the rate of live preterm birth was surprisingly 3.8%, significantly lower than rates reported from all of the region. The study did identify a few preventable factors (interpregnancy interval of <18 months and low or high BMI), hence was not comprehensive, and furthermore the economic changes in the country partly because of the civil strife and poverty have undoubtedly increased the number and prevalence of preventable factors [24]. That study [24] could be criticised on many counts, the most important being that the cohort was not reflective of the country (the rate was too low). In another study in North Ethiopia, age, rural residency, lack of antenatal care, multiple pregnancy and malaria infections were identified as preventable factors associated with PTB [7]. The aims of this study were therefore to comprehensively investigate and identify the modifiable/preventable factors (including intrinsic maternal factors like nutrition and extrinsic factors) and determine whether they are similar to those reported from other sub-Sahara countries and middle- and high-income countries in the hope of overcoming the weaknesses in the previous and retrospective studies. Identifying these factors should provide healthcare policy makers a list to address in any multidisciplinary attempt to reduce the rate and burden of PTB in Sudan.

2. Materials and Methods

Study design and setting
This was a prospective study at Omdurman Maternity Hospital, located in Khartoum State for the period June to December 2022 - a period of political instability and population displacement that preceded the ongoing civil war. All pregnant mothers who received antenatal care and their pregnancies progressed beyond 26 weeks of gestation and delivered in the hospital were recruited. We excluded those who miscarried or had an elective caesarean section (normally performed at term). For each woman studied, a set of variables were extracted from their records onto a spread sheet. These included age, family income, level of education, antenatal folic acid and iron supplementation, number of antenatal visits, obstetric history (including previous deliveries, miscarriages and gestational age at delivery), medical history, social variables (smoking, alcohol and drugs) and any complications during pregnancy. All information was collected on a spreadsheet.
The family income was estimated from the combined earnings of the woman and her husband. Education level was categorised into
The women who delivered before 37 weeks were analysed as the preterm group while those whose pregnancies progress to at least 37 weeks of gestation were analysed as the term group.
Preterm birth was defined as delivery between before 37 completed weeks of gestation. 26 weeks is the gestational age cut-off for fetal viability in viability in Sudan.
Nutritional status was assessed at the first antenatal visit using Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC). Status was categorized as 'poor' (MUAC < 23 cm), 'normal' (MUAC 23-28 cm), or 'good/excellent' (MUAC > 28 cm) [25,26].
Iron and folate supplementation was categorized as 'regular' if the woman reported taking prescribed supplements for more than 75% of her pregnancy days, and 'rare' if taken for less than 50%.
Antenatal care (ANC) attendance was considered 'regular' if the woman attended at least 4 scheduled antenatal visits prior to delivery, as per WHO recommendations. Attendance of fewer than 4 visits was deemed 'inadequate'.
Data analysis
The IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences software, version 27of 2019, was used for analysis. Data are presented as means and standard deviation if normally distributed and median and range if not. Normal distribution was tested by the Kolmogorov Smirnov test. Comparisons between the groups were made using Chi square Test or Fisher’s Exact Test. Binary logistic regression Test was used to identify risk factors associated with PTB. The statistical analysis was undertaken by a statistician (Dr Rami Yousif Hasabelrasul Mohamed)
Ethical consideration
Ethics approval for the study was obtained from the Sudan Medical Specialization Board (SMSB), council of family medicine, Khartoum state ministry of health research department on 25th May 2022. Each woman who was included in the study gave a signed informed consent to participate in the study. Each study participant was assigned a study number, and the data were extracted and analysed anonymously.

3. Results

Over the study period, a total there were a total of 411 deliveries, and 384 pregnant women were recruited (20 excluded as these were elective term CSs and 11 delivered between 24 and 26 weeks) and followed up. Table 1 shows the demographics of the cohort. The mean (SD) age was 27 (6) years (range 16-45 years). Most of the women were housewives (88.8%) and more than three quarters were from families that owned their houses (75.5%). 177 (46.1%) of the women were primigravida. In the multigravida group (207), 31 (8.1%) had previously delivered preterm. There were 50 (13%) multiple pregnancies. The education level of the women varied. 62% had secondary school, university or postgraduate education and 32% were either illiterates or had only completed primary schooling. 69.5% of the husband's had either secondary, university or postgraduate education and 30.5% were either illiterates or had only primary schooling. Approximately, two-third (66.7%) of husband's were self-employed and non-smokers (75.8%). With regards to the income of the household from which the women came, 4.4% had a total monthly income of <30.000-50.000 Sudanese pound (SDG)[50-85 USD], 18.0% >50.000-70.000 SDG[85-120 USD], 46.1% >70.000-100.000 SDG[120-170 USD], and 31.5% >100,000 SDG[>170 USD].
Table 2 shows the inter-pregnancy interval, nutritional status at first visit, regularity of antenatal visits and micronutrient supplementation. The inter-pregnancy interval was less than 6 months in 21 (10.1%) of cases, 6–12 months in 34 (16.4%), >1-2 years in 57 (27.5%) and more than 2 years in 95 (46.0%) cases. About 64.1% (246) of mothers received folate and iron supplementation regularly while 60.4% (232) attended antenatal care regularly. More than half of the mothers' nutrition during pregnancy was judged as either excellent or good in 63.3% (N=243) of cases and poor in 6.8% (N=26) of cases.
The complications reported in the pregnancy are shown in Table 3. The most common were hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (15.6%), diabetes mellitus (17.4%) and urinary tract infections (16.9%). Malaria was diagnosed in 3.9% of cases.
In this cohort there were 30 preterm deliveries for a rate of 7.8% and 4 neonatal deaths. A comparative analysis (Table 4) was undertaken of variables in the cohort - divided into those who had preterm birth and those who delivered at term. Sociodemographic factors that were significantly more common in the preterm group included younger mothers age (P=0.017), area of residence (P=0.013), and poor housing (P=0.007).
Table 5 shows the relationship between pregnancy complications and preterm and delivery. Multiple pregnancy, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, diabetes mellitus, and toxoplasmosis in pregnancy were all associated with a statistically increased risk of preterm birth. Of all the antenatal complications, urinary tract infection had the highest impact on the risk of preterm birth (P=0.000001 OR - 5.685 (95%CI 1.752-18.447) followed by previous preterm birth (P=0.0001, OR=35.094, (95%CI 5.983-205.856) and antepartum haemorrhage (P=0.002; OR 29.085 (95%CI 3.325-254.431). Interestingly malaria infection was not a risk factor for preterm birth, but the number of confirmed infections was very small.
A logistic regression was undertaken to predict which factors had the greatest impact on the risk of preterm birth. Mother's age <25 years (P=0.04; OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.042-6.003) and interpregnancy interval of <6 months (P=0.04, OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.356-0.997) were associated with an increased risk of preterm birth while excellent or good nutrition (P=0.003; OR 4.069; 95%CI 1.631-10.151) was associated with a decreased risk of PTB. Table 6 shows the association between timing of delivery and family income, regularity of antenatal attendance, nutritional status at first visit to the hospital and interpregnancy intervals. Low family income was significantly associated with an increased in the risk of preterm birth (P=0.005) while regular iron and folate supplementation in pregnancy (P=0.00001), regular attendance of antenatal clinics (P=0.013) and having an excellent or good nutrition (P=0.0000001) were factors that significantly reduced the risk of preterm.

4. Discussion

The preterm delivery rate in our cohort was 7.4%. Factors which were more prevalent in those who delivered preterm included maternal age <20 years, low levels of maternal education, interpregnancy interval of <6 months low family income, inadequate folate and iron supplementation throughout pregnancy, irregular antenatal visits, poor nutritional status at booking, and previous preterm delivery. Pregnancy complications such as antepartum haemorrhage, diabetes mellitus, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, multiple pregnancy and, and urinary tract infections increased the risk of preterm birth. An interpregnancy interval of at 1-2 years was associated with the lowest risk of PTB.
The PTB rate of 7.4% in this cohort is much higher than that from previous studies in Sudan which were 3.8% in 2010 and 4.7% in 2012 [27,28]. By using a cut-off of 26 weeks, we might have under-estimated the PTB rate. Including the 7 deliveries between 24 and 26 weeks would have given a much higher PTB rate of 9.0%. The problem of variable cut-offs for defining viability are well recognised when comparing not only perinatal mortality but PTB rates across the globe [29]. Lack of high-level neonatal care facilities mean survival before 26 weeks is almost impossible in Sudan and indeed most low-income countries compared to high-income countries with viability varying from 22-24 weeks. [30,31]. There has been a consistent rise in the PTB rate in Sudan, and this is most likely to have risen exponentially with the ongoing civil war. For low and middle-income countries, this rate is in the middle of the range (5% to 19%) [3,32]. Our rate is however, comparable to those from some middle and high-income countries such as the USA with the latest reported rate of 9.6% and 5%-9% in European countries [4]. We feel that this rate does not truly reflect the magnitude of the problem in the country for two reasons - firstly, our numbers are very small and secondly, the population that comes this this hospital may be skewed toward the middle/higher income category. In our cohort, about two thirds of the women and the men had either received secondary, university or postgraduate education and just over 90% of the men were either self-employed or employed. This reflects the income for the household and therefore better nutritional status, more compliance with antenatal visits and supplementation.
Maternal age < 20 years old was found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of preterm birth. This finding is similar to that from other studies (high income and low/middle income countries). In Taiwan for example this was significantly associated with PTB [33]. Age above 35 years was not a risk factor for PTB in our series. This finding is at odds with findings from other studies especially from high income countries such as Taiwan and Canada [33,34]. Several reasons could be responsible for this - our numbers are small and furthermore our older women were multiparous having previously delivered at term which, in itself lowers the risk of PTB.
Central to maternal health is availability of not only healthcare resources but also ensuring that these are economically affordable. Family income and education status are important determinants for this. It was therefore not surprising that area of residence, housing, education and family income were all significantly associated with preterm birth in our series. Similar findings were reported from other studies [35,36,37,38]. These sociodemographic factors are interlinked and whether education is the core factor or family income is difficult to decipher. What is important is that by addressing these factors it should be possible to improve not only access but appropriate utilisation of services. In fact, regularly attending antenatal care and complying with supplementation was associated with a lower risk of preterm birth in our study. Never or rarely attending antenatal care was also significantly associated with more preterm birth. In China a study showed that those who had not attended antenatal care, had an OR of 5.19 of having a preterm birth OR = 95% CI: 3.77 - 7.14) [39].
The finding of an increased risk of preterm birth with multiple pregnancy, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy diabetes mellitus and urinary tract infections was expected as this has been widely reported [37,40,41,42,43]. While some of these may be iatrogenic, we believe that a significant number may be spontaneous. The risk of preterm birth increases with a previous PTB and this increase is exponential after 2 [9].
In low- and middle-income countries where women are likely to have several babies’ inter-pregnancy interval is critical in not only ensuring that nutrients are replenished but that breastfeeding is enough to support the baby. An inter-pregnancy interval of <6 months and >2 years are considered risk factors for PTB [15,44]. In our series, IPI of <6 months was associated with PTB but not >2 years. Interestingly in the previous study from this same region [24], interpregnancy interval of <18 months was associated with an increased risk of PTB. These contrasting findings make a strong case for large cohort studies.
Preterm pre-labour (PPROM) and chorioamnionitis are well recognised precedents of PTB. These and other factors such as bleeding in pregnancy/threatened miscarriage were not investigated as these are not modifiable (at least in the context of a low-income country). Where facilities are available, microbiology of samples from those presenting in preterm labour will help isolate infective organisms and enable preventative treatment. This is an important cause of PTB that may be modified with antibiotics. While we could not do this in this study there is increasing evidence the antibiotics to women presenting in threatened preterm may reduce the risk of PTB. [21]

5. Conclusions

In our small series, the PTB rate was 7.4% which, while better that than from most low-income countries is still considerably higher that most of the rates in high-income countries. We have shown that the traditional risk factors (pre-pregnancy and pregnancy) that have been associated with PTB also apply to Sudan, however, we have in addition shown that regular attendance at antenatal clinics and compliance with folate and iron supplementation can reduce the risk of PTB. Starting pregnancy with a good/excellent nutritional status is another factor that is associated with a lower risk for PTB. Within the context of Sudan therefore, a multi-prong approach that involves, healthcare workers, epidemiologists, nutritionist public health planners and educationists is likely to tackle most of the identifiable factors that are preventable. This is more important since neonatal facilities are poor meaning those babies delivered preterm are less likely to survive.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, SH, and BR; methodology, SH and BR.; validation, SH, BR and JCK formal analysis, BR investigation, BR writing—original draft preparation, BR and JCK writing—review and editing, KA, BA, BR and JCK visualization, supervision, BR. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.”

Funding

This research received no external funding

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Sudan Medical Specialization Board Ethics Committee on 25th May 2022.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to than Dr Rami Yousif Hasabelrasul Mohamed statistician who help with the analysis

Strengths and limitations

The main strength of our study is that it was a prospective study in which most of the data would have been accurately collected. Most previous studies were retrospective with all the limitations of such studies. However, a major limitation of the study is the small numbers and the regionalised location of the study. The findings cannot therefore be generalised for the population. It is possible that in more rural areas, the rate of PTB may be higher and the factors that increase the risk may be different. That we did not include indications for iatrogenic PTB such as fetal growth disorders is another limitation of our study as this would have allowed for a better understanding of the potential additive impact of PTB on perinatal mortality and morbidity.

References

  1. Walani, SR. Global burden of preterm birth. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2020 Jul;150(1):31-3.
  2. Granese, R.; Gitto, E.; D'Angelo, G.; Falsaperla, R.; Corsello, G.; Amadore, D.; Calagna, G.; Fazzolari, I.; Grasso, R.; Triolo, O. Preterm birth: seven-year retrospective study in a single centre population. Ital. J. Pediatr. 2019, 45, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Chou D, Oestergaard M, Say L, Moller AB, Kinney M and LawnJ on behalf of the Born Too Soon Preterm Birth Action Group Born Too Soon: The global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births Reproductive Health 2013, 10(Suppl 1).
  4. Crump, C. Preterm birth and mortality in adulthood: a systematic review. J. Perinatol. 2019, 40, 833–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wagijo, M.-A.; Sheikh, A.; Duijts, L.; Been, J.V. Reducing tobacco smoking and smoke exposure to prevent preterm birth and its complications. Paediatr. Respir. Rev. 2015, 22, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chawanpaiboon, S.; Vogel, J.P.; Moller, A.-B.; Lumbiganon, P.; Petzold, M.; Hogan, D.; Landoulsi, S.; Jampathong, N.; Kongwattanakul, K.; Laopaiboon, M.; et al. Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Glob. Heal. 2019, 7, e37–e46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Aregawi, G.; Assefa, N.; Mesfin, F.; Tekulu, F.; Adhena, T.; Mulugeta, M.; Gebreayezgi, G. Preterm births and associated factors among mothers who gave birth in Axum and Adwa Town public hospitals, Northern Ethiopia, 2018. BMC Res. Notes 2019, 12, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wagura, P.; Wasunna, A.; Laving, A.; Wamalwa, D.; Ng’aNg’a, P. Prevalence and factors associated with preterm birth at kenyatta national hospital. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018, 18, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jacob, J.; Lehne, M.; Mischker, A.; Klinger, N.; Zickermann, C.; Walker, J. Cost effects of preterm birth: a comparison of health care costs associated with early preterm, late preterm, and full-term birth in the first 3 years after birth. Eur. J. Heal. Econ. 2016, 18, 1041–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. McCarthy, R.; Martin-Fairey, C.; Sojka, D.K.; Herzog, E.D.; Jungheim, E.S.; Stout, M.J.; Fay, J.C.; Mahendroo, M.; Reese, J.; Herington, J.L.; et al. Mouse models of preterm birth: suggested assessment and reporting guidelines†. Biol. Reprod. 2018, 99, 922–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ahmed, B.; Abushama, M.; Konje, J.C. Prevention of spontaneous preterm delivery – an update on where we are today. J. Matern. Neonatal Med. 2023, 36, 2183756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Villar, J.; Papageorghiou, A.T.; Knight, H.E.; Gravett, M.G.; Iams, J.; Waller, S.A.; Kramer, M.; Culhane, J.F.; Barros, F.C.; Conde-Agudelo, A.; et al. The preterm birth syndrome: a prototype phenotypic classification. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012, 206, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Manuck TA, Esplin MS, Biggio J, Bukowski R, Parry S, Zhang H et al. The phenotype of spontaneous preterm birth: application of a clinical phenotyping tool. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2015;212:487.e1-11. Chawanpaiboon S, Vogel JP, Moller AB, et al. Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2019; 7: e37–46.
  14. Vogel, J.P.; Chawanpaiboon, S.; Moller, A.-B.; Watananirun, K.; Bonet, M.; Lumbiganon, P. The global epidemiology of preterm birth. Best Pr. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2018, 52, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sarhan AL, Anini HE. Risk factors of preterm birth among palestinian women: case control study. Austin J Nurs Health Care. 2015;2(1):1–8.
  16. Howson CP, Kinney MV, Lawn JE, editors. Born too soon: the global action report on preterm birth. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2012. March of Dimes, PMNCH, save the children, WHO. Available from: http://www.who.int/pmnch/media/news/2012/201204_borntoosoon-report.pdf.
  17. Chen, L.-W.; Lim, A.L.; Colega, M.; Tint, M.-T.; Aris, I.M.; Tan, C.S.; Chong, Y.-S.; Gluckman, P.D.; Godfrey, K.M.; Kwek, K.; et al. Maternal Folate Status, but Not That of Vitamins B-12 or B-6, Is Associated with Gestational Age and Preterm Birth Risk in a Multiethnic Asian Population, J. Nutr. 2015, 145, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dahman, H. Risk factors associated with preterm birth: a retrospective study in Mukalla Maternity and Childhood Hospital, Hadhramout Coast/Yemen. Sudan. J. Paediatr. 2020, 20, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. vanmathi S, Monitha SM, Venkateswaramurthy N, Sambathkumar R. A Qualitative Knowledge Assessment of Pregnant Women on Preterm Birth in A Tertiary Care Hospital. Int. J. Life Sci. Pharma Res. 2019 Oct;9(4):28-35.
  20. Born Too Soon: The Global Action Report on Preterm Birth. https://www.efcni.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/BornTooSoonExecSummary_v05.
  21. Al Baloushi, M.; Ahmed, B.; Konje, J.C. Infections as a Cause of Preterm Birth: Amniotic Fluid Sludge—An Ultrasound Marker for Intra-Amniotic Infections and a Risk Factor for Preterm Birth. Diagnostics 2025, 15, 2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Shaggag, L.M.; Alhabardi, N.; Adam, I. The Association between Maternal Periodontitis and Preterm Birth: A Case-Control Study in a Low-Resource Setting in Sudan, Africa. Medicina 2022, 58, 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sharif, M.E.; Mohamedain, A.; Ahmed, A.A.; Nasr, A.M.; Adam, I. Folic acid level and preterm birth among Sudanese women. Matern. Heal. Neonatol. Perinatol. 2017, 3, 25–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Alhaj, A.M.; Radi, E.A.; Adam, I. Epidemiology of preterm birth in Omdurman maternity hospital, Sudan. J. Matern. Neonatal Med. 2009, 23, 131–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mehrotra, R.; Yallamraju, S.R.; Sinha, A.; Gattumeedhi, S.R.; Gupta, A.; Khadse, S.V. Use of mid upper arm circumference for evaluation of nutritional status of OSMF patients. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2014, 4, 122–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Musa, I.R.; Omar, S.M.; AlEed, A.; Al-Nafeesah, A.; Adam, I. Mid-upper arm circumference as a screening tool for identifying underweight adolescents. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1200077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen C, Zhang JW, Xia HW, Zhang HX, Betran AP, Zhang L, Hua XL, Feng LP, Chen D, Sun K, Guo CM. Preterm birth in China between 2015 and 2016. American journal of public health. 2019 Nov;109(11):1597-604.
  28. Bhowmik, B.; Siddique, T.; Majumder, A.; Mdala, I.; Hossain, I.A.; Hassan, Z.; Jahan, I.; Moreira, N.C.D.V.; Alim, A.; Basit, A.; et al. Maternal BMI and nutritional status in early pregnancy and its impact on neonatal outcomes at birth in Bangladesh. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019, 19, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mohangoo, A.D.; Blondel, B.; Gissler, M.; Velebil, P.; Macfarlane, A.; Zeitlin, J. ; the Euro-Peristat Scientific Committee International Comparisons of Fetal and Neonatal Mortality Rates in High-Income Countries: Should Exclusion Thresholds Be Based on Birth Weight or Gestational Age? PLOS ONE 2013, 8, e64869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Joseph, K.S.; Liu, S.; Rouleau, J.; Lisonkova, S.; Hutcheon, J.A.; Sauve, R.; Allen, A.C.; Kramer, M.S. ; for the Fetal and Infant Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System Influence of definition based versus pragmatic birth registration on international comparisons of perinatal and infant mortality: population based retrospective study. BMJ 2012, 344, e746–e746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Getaneh, T.; Homaira, N.; Kasaye, H.; Tapawan, S.J.C.; Chughtai, A.A.; Lui, K. Global inequities in the survival of extremely preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2025, 25, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Swarray-Deen, A.; Sepenu, P.; Mensah, T.E.; Osei-Agyapong, J.; Sefogah, P.E.; Appiah-Sakyi, K.; Ahmed, B.; Konje, J.C. Preterm birth in low-middle income Countries. Best Pr. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2024, 95, 102518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chen KH, Chen IC, Yang YC, Chen KT. The trends and associated factors of preterm deliveries from 2001 to 2011 in Taiwan. Medicine. 2019 Mar;98(13).
  34. Fuchs F, Monet B, Ducruet T, Chaillet N, Audibert F. Effect of maternal age on the risk of preterm birth: A large cohort study. PloS one. 2018 Jan 31;13(1):e0191002.
  35. Rai, R.K.; Sudfeld, C.R.; Barik, A.; Fawzi, W.W.; Chowdhury, A. Sociodemographic Determinants of Preterm Birth and Small for Gestational Age in Rural West Bengal, India. J. Trop. Pediatr. 2019, 65, 537–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Masaba, B.B.; Mmusi-Phetoe, R.M. Neonatal Survival in Sub-Sahara: A Review of Kenya and South Africa. J. Multidiscip. Heal. 2020, ume 13, 709–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wagura, P.; Wasunna, A.; Laving, A.; Wamalwa, D.; Ng’aNg’a, P. Prevalence and factors associated with preterm birth at kenyatta national hospital. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018, 18, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Woday, A.; Muluneh, M.D.; Sherif, S. Determinants of preterm birth among mothers who gave birth at public hospitals in the Amhara region, Ethiopia: A case-control study. PLOS ONE 2019, 14, e0225060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jiang, M.; Mishu, M.M.; Lu, D.; Yin, X. A case control study of risk factors and neonatal outcomes of preterm birth. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 57, 814–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Teklay, G.; Teshale, T.; Tasew, H.; Mariye, T.; Berihu, H.; Zeru, T. Risk factors of preterm birth among mothers who gave birth in public hospitals of central zone, Tigray, Ethiopia: unmatched case–control study 2017/2018. BMC Res. Notes 2018, 11, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Depa, A.R.; Gundabattula, S.R. Recurrence risk of preterm births: a retrospective Indian study. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2019, 40, 925–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Pusdekar YV, Patel AB, Kurhe KG, Bhargav SR, Thorsten V, Garces A, Goldenberg RL, Goudar SS, Saleem S, Esamai F, Chomba E. Rates and risk factors for preterm birth and low birthweight in the global network sites in six low-and low middle-income countries. Reproductive Health. 2020 Dec;17(3):1-6.
  43. Jamal, S.; Srivastava, R. A retrospective analytical study of the epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Int. J. Reprod. Contraception, Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 6, 5453–5457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tessema, G.A.; Marinovich, M.L.; Håberg, S.E.; Gissler, M.; Mayo, J.A.; Nassar, N.; Ball, S.; Betrán, A.P.; Gebremedhin, A.T.; de Klerk, N.; et al. Interpregnancy intervals and adverse birth outcomes in high-income countries: An international cohort study. PLOS ONE 2021, 16, e0255000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Demographic variables.
Table 1. Demographic variables.
Variables Number Percent
Mother’s age groups
<20 years 61 15.9
20–25 years 111 28.9
26–30 years 88 22.9
31–35 years 83 21.6
>35 years 41 10.7
Previous preterm delivery
Yes 31 8.1
No 353 91.9
Housing
Owned 290 75.5
Hired (Rent) 67 17.4
Others 27 7.0
Mother’s educational level
Illiterate/Primary 146 30.0
Secondary 113 29.4
University/postgraduate 125 32.6
Mother’s occupation
Housewife 341 88.8
Employee 41 10.7
Husband’s educational level
Illiterate/Primary 117 30.5
Secondary 90 23.4
University/postgraduate 177 46.1
Husband’s occupation
Unemployed 8 2.1
Self-employed 256 66.7
Professional/employed 120 31.3
Husband’s lifestyle (smoking)
Yes 93 24.2
No 291 75.8
Table 2. Inter-pregnancy interval, nutritional status at first visit, rate of antenatal visits and micronutrient supplementation.
Table 2. Inter-pregnancy interval, nutritional status at first visit, rate of antenatal visits and micronutrient supplementation.
Variables Number Percent
*Interpregnancy interval (IPI) (N=207)
<6 months 21 10.1
6–12 months 34 16.4
2 years 57 27.5
>2 years 95 45.9
Received iron and folic acid (N=384)
Regular 246 64.1
Sometimes 127 33.1
Rarely/never 11 2.8
Antenatal care attendance (N=384)
Regular (4 or more) 232 60.4
Sometimes (2-3) 133 34.6
Rarely/never (0-1) 19 4.9
Nutrition during pregnancy (N=384)
Excellent 53 13.8
Good 190 49.5
Reasonable 115 29.9
Poor 26 6.8
*IPI excluding primigravidas (n=177).
Table 3. Antenatal complications.
Table 3. Antenatal complications.
Variables Number Percent
Antepartum Haemorrhage
None 373 97.1
Yes 11 2.8
Multiple pregnancy
Yes 50 13
No 334 87
Hypertension during pregnancy
Yes 60 15.6
No 324 84.4
Diabetes during pregnancy
Yes 67 17.4
No 317 82.6
UTI during pregnancy
Yes 65 16.9
No 319 83.1
Periodontal infection during pregnancy
Yes 7 1.8
No 377 98.2
Malaria during pregnancy
Yes 15 3.9
No 369 96.1
Toxoplasmosis
Yes 3 0.8
No 381 99.2
Table 4. Association between preterm and term delivery with sociodemographic data.
Table 4. Association between preterm and term delivery with sociodemographic data.
Variables Delivery outcome Pearson Chi-Square
Preterm (N=30) Term (N=354) P value
Number % Number %
Mother's age groups <20 years 10 33.3 51 14.4 0.017
20-25 years 10 33.3 101 28.5
26-30 years 2 6.7 86 24.3
31-35 years 7 23.3 76 21.5
>35 years 1 3.3 40 11.3
Residence Urban 24 80.0 333 94.1 0.013
Rural 6 20.0 21 5.9
Housing Owned 19 63.3 271 76.6 0.007
Renting 4 13.3 63 17.8
Others* 7 23.3 20 5.6
Mother's educational level Illiterate 6 20.0 52 14.7 0.300
Primary 9 30.0 79 22.3
Secondary 7 23.3 106 29.9
University 7 23.3 114 32.2
Post graduate 1 3.3 3 0.8
Mother's occupation Housewife 27 90.0 314 88.7 0.999
Employee 3 10.0 38 10.7
Heavy physical laborer 0 0.0 2 0.6
Husband's educational level Illiterate 6 20.0 50 14.1 0.240
Primary 6 20.0 55 15.5
Secondary 10 33.3 80 22.6
University 8 26.7 163 46.0
Postgraduate 0 0.0 6 1.7
Husband's occupation Unemployed 0 0.0 8 2.3 0.146
Self Employed 25 83.3 231 65.3
Professional/ employed 5 16.7 115 32.5
Husband’s life style (smoking) Yes 8 26.7 85 24.0 0.744
No 22 73.3 269 76.0
*sharing with other families/friends.
Table 5. Relationship between antenatal complication and preterm or term delivery.
Table 5. Relationship between antenatal complication and preterm or term delivery.
Variables Delivery outcome Pearson Chi-Square
Preterm (N=30) Term (N=354) P value
Number % Number %
Antepartum hemorrhage No 26 86.7 347 98.0 0.002
Once 2 6.7 7 2.0
Multiple 2 6.7 0 0.0
Multiple birth Yes 11 36.7 39 11.0 0.001
No 19 63.3 315 89.0
Hypertension during pregnancy Yes 11 36.7 49 13.8 0.003
No 19 63.3 305 86.2
Diabetes during pregnancy Yes 11 36.7 56 15.8 0.004
No 19 63.3 298 84.2
Previous preterm delivery Yes 7 23.3 24 6.8 0.0001
No 23 76.7 330 93.2
UTI during pregnancy Yes 15 50.0 50 14.1 0.000001
No 15 50.0 304 85.9
Periodontal infection during pregnancy Yes 2 6.7 5 1.4 0.097
No 28 93.3 349 98.6
Malaria during pregnancy Yes 2 6.7 13 3.7 0.330
No 28 93.3 341 96.3
Primary Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnancy Yes 2 6.7 1 0.3 0.017
No 28 93.3 353 99.7
Table 6. Association between timing of delivery (term or preterm) and antenatal care variables, interpregnancy-interval and Family monthly income.
Table 6. Association between timing of delivery (term or preterm) and antenatal care variables, interpregnancy-interval and Family monthly income.
Variables Delivery outcome Pearson Chi-Square
Preterm (N=30) Term (N=354) P value
Number % Number %
Family Income per month <30.000-50.000 SDG 0 0.0 17 4.8 0.005
>50.000-70.000 SDG 12 40.0 57 16.1
>70.000-100.000 SDG 14 46.7 163 46.0
>100,000 4 13.3 117 33.1
Spacing interval for this pregnancy Primigravida 17 56.7 160 45.2 0.413
≤1 years 5 16.7 50 14.1
1-2 years 4 13.3 53 15.0
>2 years 4 13.3 91 25.7
Receive iron and folic acid during this pregnancy Regular 11 36.7 235 66.4 0.00001
Sometimes 15 50.0 112 31.6
Rarely 2 6.7 2 0.6
Never 2 6.7 5 1.4
Antenatal care attendant Regular 12 40.0 220 62.1 0.013
Sometimes 14 46.7 119 33.6
Rarely 1 3.3 9 2.5
Never 3 10.0 6 1.7
Type of nutrition during pregnancy Excellent 0 0.0 53 15.0 0.0000001
Good 7 23.3 183 51.7
Reasonable 15 50.0 100 28.2
Poor 8 26.7 18 5.1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated