Submitted:
28 October 2025
Posted:
29 October 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Participants
2.2. Measures
2.2.1. Social ISOLATION
2.2.2. Sense of COHERENCE (SOC)
2.2.3. Nutritional Status
2.2.4. Risk of Care Dependency
2.3. Data Collection
2.4. Missing Data Handling
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Participant Characteristics
3.2. Main Analysis
3.3. Model Comparison: With vs. Without the Interaction Term
3.4. Robustness Analyses
3.5. Bootstrap Validation of the Interaction Effect
3.6. Visualization of the Interaction Effect

4. Discussion
4.1. Social Isolation and the Risk of Care Dependency
4.2. The Buffering Role of SOC
4.3. Cultural and Practical Implications
4.4. Limitations and Future Directions
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Public Involvement Statement
Guidelines and Standards Statement
Use of Artificial Intelligence
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
References
- Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146–56. [CrossRef]
- Nicholson NR. A review of social isolation: an important but underassessed condition in older adults. J Prim Prev. 2012;33(2–3):137–52. [CrossRef]
- Shankar A, McMunn A, Banks J, Steptoe A. Loneliness, social isolation, and behavioral and biological health indicators in older adults. Health Psychol. 2011;30(4):377–85. [CrossRef]
- Wang J, Lloyd-Evans B, Giacco D, Forsyth R, Nebo C, Mann F, et al. Social isolation in mental health: a conceptual and methodological review. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017;52:1451–61. [CrossRef]
- Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. Annual report on the ageing society: 2024 White Paper. 2024. Available from: https://www8.cao.go.jp/kourei/whitepaper/w-2024/html/zenbun/index.html (in Japanese).
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. The 8th Long-Term Care Insurance Project Plan: Basic Guidelines. 2021. Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/12300000/000598356.pdf (in Japanese).
- World Health Organization. World report on ageing and health. Geneva: WHO; 2015. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565042.
- Antonovsky A. Unraveling the mystery of health: how people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1987.
- Eriksson M, Lindström B. Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale and the relation with health: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(5):376–81. [CrossRef]
- Giglio R, Rodríguez-Blázquez C, De Pedro-Cuesta J, Forjaz M. Sense of coherence and health of community-dwelling older adults in Spain. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014;27:621–8. [CrossRef]
- Lv J, Qian M, Deng M, Yu M. The association between sense of coherence and health outcomes among community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review. Interdiscip Nurs Res. 2023;2:46–57. [CrossRef]
- Koppner J, Lindelöf A, Iredahl F, Nilsson S, Thorsell A, Larsen H, et al. Sense of coherence, mental health, and hair cortisol concentrations among older people during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2024;24:19034. [CrossRef]
- Possebon A, Martins A, Danigno J, Langlois C, Silva A. Sense of coherence and oral health in older adults in Southern Brazil. Gerodontology. 2017;34:377–81. [CrossRef]
- Komeili T, Khahan-Yazdi I, Sadri M, Shokouhi-Tabar M, Heidari M, Taheri-Kharameh Z. Sense of coherence as a protective factor of health-related quality of life in Iranian older adults. Discov Soc Sci Health. 2024. [CrossRef]
- Adebusoye L, Oyinlola O, Cadmus E, Obadare A. Factors associated with the sense of coherence among older adults attending a geriatric centre in Nigeria. Ageing Int. 2024. [CrossRef]
- Van Woerden HC, Angus N, Kiparoglou V, Atherton I, Leung J. Long-term conditions in older people are linked with loneliness, but a sense of coherence buffers the adverse effects on quality of life: a cross-sectional study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:2467–75. [CrossRef]
- Lin Y, Zhang B, Ma Y. How do aging self-stereotypes relate to social isolation in older adults? The intervening roles of sense of coherence and cellphone use. Psychol Rep. 2024;127(3):1100–16. [CrossRef]
- Park NS, Jang Y, Yoon JW, Chung S, Chiriboga DA. Relationship of social isolation with mental distress among older Korean Americans: the moderating role of social cohesion. Health Soc Care Community. 2022;30(6):e4909–19. [CrossRef]
- Kurimoto A, Awata S, Ohkubo T, Tsubota-Utsugi M, Asayama K, Takahashi K, et al. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the abbreviated Lubben Social Network Scale. Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2011;48(2):149–57. (in Japanese). [CrossRef]
- Lubben J, Blozik E, Gillmann G, Iliffe S, von Renteln Kruse W, Beck JC, et al. Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben Social Network Scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations. Gerontologist. 2006;46(4):503–13. [CrossRef]
- Röhr S, Wittmann F, Engel C, Enzenbach C, Witte AV, Villringer A, et al. Social factors and the prevalence of social isolation in a population-based adult cohort. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022;57(10):1959–68. [CrossRef]
- Zavaleta D, Samuel K, Mills C. Measures of social isolation. Soc Indic Res. 2017;131:367–91. [CrossRef]
- Togari T, Yamazaki Y, Nakayama K, Shimizu J. Development of a short version of the sense of coherence scale for population survey. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61(10):921–2. [CrossRef]
- Rubenstein LZ, Harker JO, Salvà A, Guigoz Y, Vellas B. Screening for undernutrition in geriatric practice: developing the short-form mini-nutritional assessment (MNA-SF). J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(6):M366–72. [CrossRef]
- Kaiser MJ, Bauer JM, Ramsch C, Uter W, Guigoz Y, Cederholm T, et al. Validation of the Mini Nutritional Assessment short-form (MNA-SF): a practical tool for identification of nutritional status. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009;13(9):782–8. [CrossRef]
- Satake S, Senda K, Hong YJ, Miura H, Endo H, Sakurai T, et al. Validity of the Kihon Checklist for assessing frailty status: Kihon Checklist as frailty scale. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016;16(6):709–15. (in Japanese). [CrossRef]
- Shinkai S, Watanabe N, Yoshida H, Fujiwara Y, Nishi M, Fukaya T, et al. Validity of the “Kaigo-Yobo Checklist” as a frailty index. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2013;60(5):262–74. (in Japanese). [CrossRef]
- Shinkai S, Watanabe N, Yoshida H, Fujiwara Y, Amano H, Lee S, et al. Research on screening for frailty: development of “the Kaigo-Yobo Checklist.” Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2010;57(5):345–54. (in Japanese). [CrossRef]
- Murayama H, Nishi M, Shimizu Y, Kim MJ, Yoshida H, Amano H, et al. The Hatoyama Cohort Study: design and profile of participants at baseline. J Epidemiol. 2012;22(6):551–8. [CrossRef]
- Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Barthel Index (BI). In: McDowell I, editor. A compendium of tests, scales and questionnaires. 1st ed. London: Psychology Press; 2020. p.421–5.
- Lawton M, Brody E. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9(3):179–86.
- R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2024. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/.
- Tomaka J, Thompson S, Palacios R. The relation of social isolation, loneliness, and social support to disease outcomes among the elderly. J Aging Health. 2006;18(3):359–84. [CrossRef]
- Super S, Wagemakers MAE, Picavet HSJ, Verkooijen KT, Koelen MA. Strengthening sense of coherence: opportunities for theory building in health promotion. Health Promot Int. 2016;31(4):869–78. [CrossRef]
- Markus HR, Kitayama S. Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol Rev. 1991;98(2):224–53. [CrossRef]
| Variable | Value (mean ± SD or n [%]) |
| Age | 77.89 ± 7.61 |
| Female | 354(68.2%) |
| Living alone | 155(29.9%) |
| Social network (LSNS-6) | 14.91 ± 6.03 |
| Sense of coherence (SOC) | 15.65 ± 3.61 |
| Nutritional status (MNA-SF) | 11.68 ± 2.48 |
| Risk of Care dependency (Care Prevention Checklist ) | 3.14 ± 2.21 |
| Model1 | Model2 | ||||||
| Variable | β | SE | p-value | β | SE | p-value | |
| Intercept | 0.027 | 0.068 | .696 | -0.002 | 0.068 | .976 | |
| LSNS-6 | -0.251 | 0.041 | < .001 *** | -0.248 | 0.041 | < .001 *** | |
| SOC | -0.119 | 0.04 | .003 ** | -0.116 | 0.04 | .004 ** | |
| MNA-SF | -0.221 | 0.046 | < .001 *** | -0.224 | 0.046 | < .001 *** | |
| Age | 0.263 | 0.043 | < .001 *** | 0.25 | 0.043 | < .001 *** | |
| Female (ref: male) | -0.03 | 0.085 | .724 | -0.032 | 0.084 | .709 | |
| Living alone | 0.036 | 0.095 | .706 | 0.041 | 0.095 | .665 | |
| LSNS-6×SOC | — | — | — | 0.1 | 0.035 | .004 ** |
| Variable | β̂ (m = 50) | SE | p-value | β̂ (m = 20) | SE | p-value | |
| Intercept | -0.034 | 0.069 | .624 | -0.033 | 0.069 | .638 | |
| LSNS-6 | -0.281 | 0.041 | <.001 *** | -0.285 | 0.04 | <.001*** | |
| OC | -0.103 | 0.041 | .013 * | -0.1 | 0.041 | .014 * | |
| MNA-SF | -0.158 | 0.041 | <.001 *** | -0.159 | 0.041 | <.001*** | |
| Age | 0.239 | 0.043 | <.001 *** | 0.239 | 0.043 | <.001*** | |
| Female (ref: male) | -0.009 | 0.085 | .92 | -0.009 | 0.085 | .918 | |
| Living alone | 0.047 | 0.094 | .617 | 0.045 | 0.094 | .629 | |
| LSNS-6 × SOC | 0.1 | 0.037 | .007 ** | 0.097 | 0.035 | .006 ** |
| Robust linear model | Gamma Regression model | ||||||
| Variable | β̂ (rlm) | SE | t-value | β̂ (glm) | SE | p-value | |
| Intercept | 2.999 | 0.145 | 20.63 | 1.39 | 0.037 | <.001 *** | |
| LSNS-6 | -0.638 | 0.083 | -7.65 | -0.142 | 0.021 | <.001 *** | |
| SOC | -0.261 | 0.083 | -3.16 | -0.051 | 0.021 | .015 * | |
| MNA-SF | -0.347 | 0.086 | -4.04 | -0.09 | 0.022 | <.001 *** | |
| Age | 0.494 | 0.09 | 5.5 | 0.125 | 0.023 | <.001 *** | |
| Female (ref: male) | -0.118 | 0.177 | -0.67 | -0.024 | 0.045 | .6 | |
| Living alone | 0.118 | 0.197 | 0.6 | 0.004 | 0.05 | .929 | |
| LSNS-6 × SOC | 0.201 | 0.072 | 2.78 | 0.033 | 0.018 | †.077 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).