Submitted:
10 October 2025
Posted:
13 October 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Overview of the Study Area
2.2. Sample Collection and Analysis
2.3. Data Processing
2.4. Research Technique
2.4.1. Nemero Integrated Pollution Index Method

2.4.2. Potential Ecological Risk Index Method
2.4.3. Geoaccumulation Index Method
2.4.4. Indicator Kriging
2.4.5. Principal Component Analysis
2.4.6. PMF Model
3. Results
3.1. Statistical Analysis of Heavy Metal Content
| Item | Cd | Cr | Pb | Hg | As |
| Background value | 0.112 | 60 | 20.9 | 0.021 | 11.9 |
| Item | Number | Number of different risk points | Max (mg/kg) | Min(mg/kg) | Mean(mg/kg) | CV | ||
| Low | Medium | High | Midium | Low | ||||
| Cd | 820 | 816 | 2 | 2 | 0.61 | 0.1 | 0.27 | 0.3 |
| Cr | 820 | 820 | 0 | 0 | 97.2 | 14.3 | 57.34 | 0.28 |
| Pb | 820 | 820 | 0 | 0 | 52.4 | 10.4 | 23.81 | 0.19 |
| Hg | 820 | 820 | 0 | 0 | 0.18 | 0.003 | 0.04 | 0.47 |
| As | 820 | 820 | 0 | 0 | 20.3 | 1.77 | 9.91 | 0.24 |
| PH | 820 | — | — | — | 9.09 | 6.45 | 8.18 | 0.04 |
| OM(g/kg) | 820 | — | — | — | 61.5 | 2.31 | 14.35 | 0.43 |
| CEC (cmol/kg) | 820 | — | — | — | 18.3 | 3.1 | 10.95 | 0.2 |
3.2. Heavy Metal Pollution Assessment and Risk Assessment of Cultivated Soil
3.2.1. Evaluation of Soil Comprehensive Pollution Index
3.2.2. Evaluation of Geoaccumulation Index
| Item | Max | Min | Proportion of Sample Points by Different Pollution Levels(%) | ||||||
| No pollution | Mild | Moderate-Tending | Moderate | Severe-Tending | Severe | Critical | |||
| Cd | 0.61 | 0.10 | 7.93 | 74.39 | 17.70 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cr | 97.20 | 14.30 | 99.76 | 0.24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pb | 52.40 | 10.40 | 96.70 | 3.30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hg | 0.18 | 0.003 | 29.76 | 61.34 | 8.78 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| As | 20.30 | 1.77 | 99.63 | 0.37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3.3. Analysis of Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Heavy Metals and PH

3.4. Analysis of Heavy Metal Sources
3.4.1. Correlation Analysis of Heavy Metals in Soil

3.4.2. Principal Component Analysis of Heavy Metals in Soil
| Item | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 |
| As | 0.81 | -0.061 | -0.092 |
| Cr | 0.694 | 0.13 | 0.401 |
| Cd | -0.184 | 0.844 | 0.05 |
| Pb | 0.41 | 0.646 | -0.047 |
| Hg | 0.038 | -0.007 | 0.955 |
| Eigenvalue | 1.529 | 1.084 | 0.964 |
| Variance Contribution Rate(%) | 30.57 | 21.67 | 19.28 |
| Cumulative Variance Contribution Rate | 30.57 | 52.24 | 71.52 |
3.4.3. PMF Heavy Metal Quantitative Source Analysis
4. Discussion
4.1. Heavy Metal Pollution Status and Risk Assessment of Cultivated Soil in Ningxia
4.2. Analysis of Heavy Metal Sources in Cultivated Soil of Ningxia
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- The concentrations of five heavy metals in cultivated soil in Ningxia were below the threshold values for agricultural soil pollution risk. However, the average levels of Cd, Pb, and Hg exceeded the background levels of Ningxia soil, with Cd and As approaching the threshold values for agricultural soil pollution risk. Given that heavy metals are significant contributors to adult carcinogenic risk(Jia et al.2020;Selahvarzi et al.2024), continuous long-term monitoring is essential.
- (2)
- The single-factor index method and Nemerow comprehensive pollution index method indicated that, overall, the cultivated soil in Ningxia was deemed clean. However, 97.44% and 80.61% of Cd and Hg elements, respectively, still exhibited medium to high potential ecological risks. The cumulative index analysis revealed that Cd and Hg are the primary heavy metal pollutants in Ningxia's cultivated soil, posing significant toxicity levels that can adversely impact plant health across various pollution levels(Huang et al.2018; Kumari et al.2024;Zhang et al.2025;Shi et al.2023). Particular concern is the compounded pollution of agricultural land due to the synergistic effects of emerging contaminants like microplastics and antibiotics, in addition to heavy metals, retained in the agricultural production processes(Pei et al.2025; Xu et al.2018;).
- (3)
- The spatial distribution patterns of heavy metals in cultivated soil in Ningxia exhibited distinct characteristics. Arsenic (As) and Chromium (Cr) displayed continuous high concentrations in the northern and western regions of the study area. Mercury (Hg) exhibited persistent high levels in the northern and eastern parts of the study area. Cadmium (Cd) showed continuous high concentrations in the central region, with elevated levels also observed in certain areas in the northern and southern parts of the study area. Lead (Pb) concentrations were predominantly high in the central and northern regions of the study area.
- (4)
- A notable inverse relationship was observed between soil salinity and heavy metal concentrations in cultivated soil, while a substantial positive correlation was noted between soil cation exchange capacity and heavy metal levels in the same soil. Analysis using Pearson correlation, principal component analysis (PCA), and positive matrix factorization (PMF) indicated that arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and chromium (Cr) predominantly originated from a combination of transportation activities and natural parent materials, mercury (Hg) primarily originated from industrial sources, and cadmium (Cd) mainly originated from agricultural activities.
Acknowledgments
References
- Hu W., Tao T., Tian K.,2021.Discussed the present status and future prospects of managing farmland soil environmental quality in China.Acta Pedologica Sinica.58(5),1094-1109.
- Ministry of Environmental Protection, 2014. People's Republic of China; Ministry of Land and Resources, People's Republic of China. Bulletin of the National Survey on Soil Pollution [R]. Beijing: Ministry of Environmental Protection.
- Yu F., Zhang Y., Yan M.,2022. Conducted a study on the heavy metal pollution levels and associated health risks in cultivated soil and crops in the mercury Kuangqu mining area. Environmental Chemistry.41(02),536-548.
- Li W., Zhu S., Wang Z.,2021.Conducted a study on heavy metal enrichment and health risk assessment in cultivated soil and crops in a coal mining area in southwest mountains. China Inorganic Analytical Chemistry.11(05),22-30.
- Rashid A., Schutte B.J., Ulery A.,2023. Investigated the impact of heavy metal contamination on agricultural soil, focusing on its effects on crop health. Agronomy. 13(6),1521.
- Zhang J., Zhai M., Chen J., 2021.Conducted a meta-analysis on the impact of metal mining on heavy metal concentrations in soils in the Kuangqu region of Southwest China.Environmental Science.42(09),4414-4421.
- Chai L., Wang X., Ma L., 2020. Conducted an analysis of heavy metal sources in cultivated soil in Lanzhou using the Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) model. Environmental Science.40(09),3919-3929.
- Hu Y., Su H., Zhang B., 2020. Discussed soil heavy metal pollution and assessment methods. Jiangsu Agricultural Science.48(17):33-39.
- Chen S., Wang M., Li S., 2019.Assessed the current status and challenges of heavy metal pollution control in Chinese farmland soil.Geoscience Frontiers.26(06),35-41.
- Zhang W., Yu R., Yang Y.,2019. Study on the migration and source analysis of heavy metals in the vertical profile of dryland soil in Xiamen. Environmental Science.40(08),3764-3773.
- Guan Y., Zhang N., Li B., 2025.A novel evaluation of farmland soil environmental risk integrating heavy metal(loid) pollution risk and industrial risk potential.Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.39,3085–3102.
- Shang, E., Xu, E., Zhang, H., 2018. Spatial and temporal variability and sources of heavy metal pollution in cultivated soils of key grain-producing regions in China. Environmental Science, 39(10), 467-4683.
- Luo Y., Teng Y., 2018. Discussed regional disparities in soil pollution across China and proposed tailored remediation approaches for distinct geographical areas. Proceedings of the China Academy of Sciences.39(10),4670-4683.
- Xu J., Meng J., Liu X., 2018. Addressed the issue of heavy metal pollution in farmland soil and its implications for food security in China. Proceedings of the China Academy of Sciences.33(02),153-159.
- Chen, Y., Fang, L., Yang, J.,2014. Farmland soil pollution status and control measures in China. Agricultural Resources and Regionalization in China, 35(4), 14.
- Hakanson, L. (198). An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control: a sedimentological approach. Water Research. 14(8), 975-1001. [CrossRef]
- Li, Y., Zong, B., Wen, B., 2024. Analysis and evaluation of heavy metal pollution in Chinese farmland soils. Environmental Science. 45(05), 2913-2925.
- Ravish, S.,2025. Enhancing precision in groundwater salinity mapping through the utilization of Indicator Kriging Technique. Appl. Water Sci. 15(7), 149-149.
- Shi H., Wang P., Zhen J., 2023. The spatial distribution characteristics of heavy metals in Chinese provincial soils and proposed zoning control measures. Environmental Science.44(8),4706-4716.
- Yu L., Wan F., Fan H., 2022. Spatial distribution, source analysis, and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in the soil of the Jianghu Gongmi producing area. Environmental Science.43(08),4199-4211.
- Li M., Shen C., Wu J., 2021.Distribution characteristics and ecological risk of heavy metals in soils across various land use types in rapidly urbanizing regions. Environmental Science.42(10),4889-4896.
- Zhang M., Chen H., Shi Q.,2019. Spatial distribution and determinants of heavy metal concentrations in the topsoil of a loess hilly and gully region. Agricultural Environmental Sciences.38(11), 2465-2475.
- Ji C., Hou D., Li F., 2020.Spatial distribution characteristics of health risks associated with heavy metals in cultivated soils. Environmental Science.41(03),1440-1448.
- Wei F., Yang G., Jiang D.,1991. The fundamental statistics and features of baseline soil element values in China. Environmental Monitoring.(01),1-6.
- Reijonen, I., Metzler, M., Hartikainen, H. 2016. Impact of soil pH and organic matter on the chemical bioavailability of vanadium species. Environmental Pollution.210, 371–379. [CrossRef]
- Uniyal et al.2024. Investigated the detrimental effects of heavy metal contamination on soil quality and plant development in agricultural settings. Emergent Life Sciences Research. 10(02), 103–115.
- Nyiramigisha, P., Komariah., Sajidan. 2021. Harmful effects of heavy metal contamination in soil and crops near landfill sites. Reviews in Agricultural Science, 9(0), 271–282.
- Luo Y., Ma Y., Wang X., 2024.Accumulation of heavy metals in cultivated land surface soil and its associated health risks. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution.235(2).
- Shen, Z., Li, J., Li, C.,2024. Pollution source apportionment of heavy metals in cultivated soil surrounding a red mud yard using APCS-MLR and PMF models. Environmental Science.2024, 45(2), 1058-1068.
- Fikret, S. Determination of heavy metal concentrations in cultivated soils and prediction of pollution risk indices using artificial neural network approach. Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali, 2024, 35(2), 451-469.
- Bi, Z., Sun, J., Xie, Y., et al. Machine learning-based source identification and ecological risk prediction of heavy metal pollution in cultivated soils. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 476:135109. [CrossRef]
- Tu J., 2024. Environmental risk and source analysis of heavy metals in tailings sand and surrounding soils in the Huangshaping mining area.Environmental Pollutants and Bioavailability.36(1). [CrossRef]
- Jing W.,2024.Sources analysis and risk assessment of heavy metals in soil in a polymetallic mining area in southeastern Hubei based on Monte Carlo simulation. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.290,117607.
- Liu, Q., Jia, Z., et al. (2019). Evaluation of heavy metal contamination, spatial distribution, and quantitative source identification in surface sediments within a partially mixed estuary (Modaomen, China). Chemosphere, 225, 829-838.
- Li, Y., Zong B., Wen B., 2024. Analysis and evaluation of heavy metal pollution in Chinese farmland soils. Environmental Science, 45(05), 2913-2925.
- Shen Z., Li J., Li C., 2024. Sources of heavy metal pollution in cultivated soil surrounding a red mud dump using APCS-MLR and PMF models. Environmental Science.45(02),1058-1068.
- Dong, M., Xia, W., Zhou, H., 2023. Investigation of soil heavy metal pollution and its underlying factors at a block scale in Hunan Province. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 (S1), 60-66.
- Luo T., Zhao F., Liu X., 2022.Sources of heavy metal pollution in cultivated soil within a representative small watershed near an industrial zone. Agricultural Modernization Research. 43(03), 541-550.
- Zhang Y., Zhou X., Zeng X.,2022. Characteristics and assessment of heavy metal contamination in soils within the industrial zone of the Yangtze River economic belt. Environmental Science.43(04), 2062-207.
- Lu B., Wang C., Shi H., 2021.Analysis of sources of heavy metal pollution in cultivated soil using a receptor model and geostatistics. Environmental Science Research.34(12),2962-2969.
- Zeng S., Yu H., Ma J., 2022. Heavy metal contamination in arable topsoil and examined the spatial trade-offs of fallow cultivation in China. Acta Pedologica Sinica.59(04),1036-1047.
- Jia, Z., 2020. Pollution characteristics, source analysis, and ecological health risk assessment of heavy metals in soils of northwest Chongqing [D]. Southwest University.10(09),25-28.
- Zhou, J.,2020. Heavy metal pollution in Chinese cultivated land and analysis of anthropogenic pollution sources. China Soil Fertil. (02),83-92.
- Wang L., and He S.,2019. Investigated the technology for safe utilization of cadmium-contaminated agricultural land. Environment and Sustainable Development, 44( 05), 134-137.
- Huang D., Zhu Q., Zhu H., 2018. Study on the advancements and future outlook of utilizing heavy metal contaminated farmland for agricultural safety. Agricultural Modernization Research.39(06), 103-1043.
- Xu J., Meng J., Liu X., 2018. Heavy metal pollution in farmland soil and its implications for food security in China. Proceedings of the China Academy of Sciences.33(02),153-159.
- Pei P., Feng Y., Zhao X., 2025. Characteristics, risks, and sources of heavy metal pollution in cultivated soils surrounding representative coal-fired industrial zones. Environmental Science.45(04), 413-423.
- Wojciech Piaszczyka, 2025.The effect of soil chemical properties and ecological implications on the distribution of heavy metals in different types of peatland.Ecological Indicators.178,113922. [CrossRef]
- Zhang C., Liu L., Dai J., 2025.The method for classifying and managing cultivated land environmental quality by assessing soil heavy metal pollution and accumulation. Ecology and Environment, 34( 02), 311-320.
- Shi H., Wang P., Zhen J., 2023.Study on the spatial distribution characteristics and zoning control measures of heavy metals in soil across various provinces in China. Environmental Science.44(08),4706-4716.
- Wei H., Luo M., Wu K., 2023.Analysis and risk assessment of heavy metal pollution sources in farmland soils of the Jidong Plain. Soil Bulletin.54(02),462-472.
- Zhang H., Cui W., Liu S., 2023.Identification of source drivers and interactions of heavy metals in cultivated soils using geosensors and multi-source data. Environmental Science.44(04),2177-2191.
- Ying, W., Aijun, D., Jianfeng, Y., 2023. Migration and accumulation of heavy metals in soil-crop systems of historically industrialized urban areas and co-assessment of associated risks. Environ. Sci. 44, 4429-4439.
- Kumari, A., Chakraborty, S. 2024. Influence of soil properties and farming techniques on microplastic levels in sandy soils and their correlation with heavy metal pollution. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 197(1), 111.
- Selahvarzi.2024. Investigation on the analysis, spatial distribution, and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in surface soils in Khorramabad, Iran. Environmental Analytical Chemistry. 104(20),8955-8976.



| Classification | Pi | PN | Pollution level |
| Ⅰ | P | P | Safe |
| Ⅱ | 0.7<P | 0.7<P | Low |
| Ⅲ | 1.0<P | 1.0<P | Moderate |
| Ⅳ | 2.0<P | 2.0<P | High |
| Ⅴ | Pi>3.0 | P | Very high |
![]() |
RI | Classification of Potential ecological risk factor |
| ≦40 | RI≦150 | Low |
| 40<≦80 | 150<RI≦300 | Moderate |
| 80<≦160 | 300<RI≦600 | Considerable |
| 160<≦320 | 600<RI≦1200 | High |
| >320 | RI>1200 | Very high |
| Item | Pollution Index | Proportion of sampling points at different pollution levels(%) | Ecological Hazard Index | Proportion of sampling sites with different ecological risk levels(%) | ||||||||
| safe | Alert | Mild | Moderate | severe | Mild | Moderate | Strong | Very strong | Extremely strong | |||
| Cd | Pi | 96.56 | 3.17 | 0.27 | 0 | 0 | 2.56 | 66.83 | 30.12 | 0.49 | 0 | |
| Cr | Pi | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Pb | Pi | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Hg | Pi | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19.39 | 41.34 | 38.05 | 1.10 | 0.12 | |
| As | Pi | 99.63 | 0.37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| PN | 99.51 | 0.49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | RI | 39.88 | 60 | 0.12 | 0 | 0 | |
| Item | R2 | Slope | Intercept |
| Pb | 0.647 | 0.408 | 13.07 |
| As | 0.676 | 0.46 | 4.795 |
| Cd | 0.841 | 0.747 | 0.06 |
| Cr | 0.784 | 0.8 | 9.627 |
| Hg | 0.998 | 0.998 | 0.001 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
