Figure 1.
Breede-Gouritz Water Management Area relative to all other WMA’s in South Africa (Department of Water and Sanitation, 2017).
Figure 1.
Breede-Gouritz Water Management Area relative to all other WMA’s in South Africa (Department of Water and Sanitation, 2017).
Figure 2.
Land cover maps according to the simplified ten land cover classes for 1990 (a), 2013/14 (b) and 2020 (c) maps, respectively. 3.2 Data analysis.
Figure 2.
Land cover maps according to the simplified ten land cover classes for 1990 (a), 2013/14 (b) and 2020 (c) maps, respectively. 3.2 Data analysis.
Figure 3.
Map of different climate zones according to the Köppen-Geiger classification (Beck et al., 2020). Large purple circles represent selected weather stations. Smaller black triangles represent the selected boreholes.
Figure 3.
Map of different climate zones according to the Köppen-Geiger classification (Beck et al., 2020). Large purple circles represent selected weather stations. Smaller black triangles represent the selected boreholes.
Figure 4.
A flowchart of the change detection analysis process and methods that were employed.
Figure 4.
A flowchart of the change detection analysis process and methods that were employed.
Figure 5.
Decomposition plots for average temperature (°C), monthly precipitation sum (mm), monthly evapotranspiration (mm), and groundwater depth (m) from boreholes J2N0580 and J2N0620 in the BWh subregion.
Figure 5.
Decomposition plots for average temperature (°C), monthly precipitation sum (mm), monthly evapotranspiration (mm), and groundwater depth (m) from boreholes J2N0580 and J2N0620 in the BWh subregion.
Figure 6.
a. Forecasts for Prins Albert T, P, ET and GWD from borehole J2N0580 in the BWh subregion, respectively. The dark blue line represents the validation data, and the lighter blue line represents the training data. The black/red line, depending on the respective model, displays the forecast for the validation period. The grey/green line, depending on the respective model, indicates the forecast for the entire period. b. Forecasts for Prins Albert GWD from boreholes J2N0582, J2N0620, and J2N0621 in the BWh subregion, respectively. The black/red line, depending on the respective model, displays the forecast for the validation period. The grey/green line, depending on the respective model, indicates the forecast for the entire period.
Figure 6.
a. Forecasts for Prins Albert T, P, ET and GWD from borehole J2N0580 in the BWh subregion, respectively. The dark blue line represents the validation data, and the lighter blue line represents the training data. The black/red line, depending on the respective model, displays the forecast for the validation period. The grey/green line, depending on the respective model, indicates the forecast for the entire period. b. Forecasts for Prins Albert GWD from boreholes J2N0582, J2N0620, and J2N0621 in the BWh subregion, respectively. The black/red line, depending on the respective model, displays the forecast for the validation period. The grey/green line, depending on the respective model, indicates the forecast for the entire period.
Figure 7.
Decomposition plots for average temperature (°C), monthly precipitation sum (mm), monthly evapotranspiration (mm), and groundwater depth (m) from boreholes 3222BC00179, J2N0001 and J2N0043 in the BWk subregion.
Figure 7.
Decomposition plots for average temperature (°C), monthly precipitation sum (mm), monthly evapotranspiration (mm), and groundwater depth (m) from boreholes 3222BC00179, J2N0001 and J2N0043 in the BWk subregion.
Figure 8.
a. Forecasts for Beaufort West T, P, ET and GWD for borehole 3222BC00170 in the BWk subregion, respectively. The dark blue line represents the validation data, and the lighter blue line represents the training data. Depending on the respective model, the black/pink/red/orange line displays the forecast for the validation period. Depending on the respective model, the grey/lime green/yellow/green line indicates the forecast for the entire period. b. Forecasts for GWD for boreholes 3222BC00179, 3222BC00152, 3222BC00171 and J2N0001 in the BWk subregion, respectively. The dark blue line represents the validation data, and the lighter blue line represents the training data. Depending on the respective model, the black/pink/red/orange line displays the forecast for the validation period. Depending on the respective model, the grey/lime green/yellow/green line indicates the forecast for the entire period. c. Forecasts for GWD for boreholes J2N0019, J2N0041, J2N0043 and J2N0550 in the BWk subregion, respectively. The dark blue line represents the validation data, and the lighter blue line represents the training data. Depending on the respective model, the black/pink/red/orange line displays the forecast for the validation period. Depending on the respective model, the grey/lime green/yellow/green line indicates the forecast for the entire period. d. Forecasts for GWD for borehole J2N0618 in the BWk subregion. The dark blue line represents the validation data, and the lighter blue line represents the training data. Depending on the respective model, the black/pink/red/orange line displays the forecast for the validation period. Depending on the respective model, the grey/lime green/yellow/green line indicates the forecast for the entire period.
Figure 8.
a. Forecasts for Beaufort West T, P, ET and GWD for borehole 3222BC00170 in the BWk subregion, respectively. The dark blue line represents the validation data, and the lighter blue line represents the training data. Depending on the respective model, the black/pink/red/orange line displays the forecast for the validation period. Depending on the respective model, the grey/lime green/yellow/green line indicates the forecast for the entire period. b. Forecasts for GWD for boreholes 3222BC00179, 3222BC00152, 3222BC00171 and J2N0001 in the BWk subregion, respectively. The dark blue line represents the validation data, and the lighter blue line represents the training data. Depending on the respective model, the black/pink/red/orange line displays the forecast for the validation period. Depending on the respective model, the grey/lime green/yellow/green line indicates the forecast for the entire period. c. Forecasts for GWD for boreholes J2N0019, J2N0041, J2N0043 and J2N0550 in the BWk subregion, respectively. The dark blue line represents the validation data, and the lighter blue line represents the training data. Depending on the respective model, the black/pink/red/orange line displays the forecast for the validation period. Depending on the respective model, the grey/lime green/yellow/green line indicates the forecast for the entire period. d. Forecasts for GWD for borehole J2N0618 in the BWk subregion. The dark blue line represents the validation data, and the lighter blue line represents the training data. Depending on the respective model, the black/pink/red/orange line displays the forecast for the validation period. Depending on the respective model, the grey/lime green/yellow/green line indicates the forecast for the entire period.
Figure 9.
Decomposition plots for average temperature (°C), monthly precipitation sum (mm), monthly evapotranspiration (mm), and groundwater depth (m) from borehole 3419AD00004 in the Csb subregion.
Figure 9.
Decomposition plots for average temperature (°C), monthly precipitation sum (mm), monthly evapotranspiration (mm), and groundwater depth (m) from borehole 3419AD00004 in the Csb subregion.
Figure 10.
a. Forecasts for T, P, and ET in the Csb subregion, respectively. The dark blue line represents the validation data, and the lighter blue line represents the training data. The black/red line, depending on the respective model, displays the forecast for the validation period. The grey/green line, depending on the respective model, indicates the linear regression forecast for the entire period. b. Forecasts for GWD for borehole 3419AD00004 in the Csb subregion, respectively. The dark blue line represents the validation data, and the lighter blue line represents the training data. The black/red line, depending on the respective model, displays the forecast for the validation period. The grey/green line, depending on the respective model, indicates the linear regression forecast for the entire period.
Figure 10.
a. Forecasts for T, P, and ET in the Csb subregion, respectively. The dark blue line represents the validation data, and the lighter blue line represents the training data. The black/red line, depending on the respective model, displays the forecast for the validation period. The grey/green line, depending on the respective model, indicates the linear regression forecast for the entire period. b. Forecasts for GWD for borehole 3419AD00004 in the Csb subregion, respectively. The dark blue line represents the validation data, and the lighter blue line represents the training data. The black/red line, depending on the respective model, displays the forecast for the validation period. The grey/green line, depending on the respective model, indicates the linear regression forecast for the entire period.
Figure 11.
Decomposition plots for average temperature (°C), monthly precipitation sum (mm), monthly evapotranspiration (mm), and groundwater depth (m) from boreholes 30,959 and H2N0521 in the Csa subregion.
Figure 11.
Decomposition plots for average temperature (°C), monthly precipitation sum (mm), monthly evapotranspiration (mm), and groundwater depth (m) from boreholes 30,959 and H2N0521 in the Csa subregion.
Figure 12.
a. Forecasts for Worcester T, P, ET and GWD for borehole 30,959 in the Csa subregion, respectively. The dark blue line represents the validation data, and the lighter blue line represents the training data. Depending on the respective model, the black/orange/pink line displays the forecast for the validation period. Depending on the respective model, the grey/lime green/yellow line indicates the forecast for the entire period. b. Forecasts for GWD for boreholes 3319CB00015, 3319CB00003, H1N0018 and H1N0055 in the Csa subregion, respectively. The dark blue line represents the validation data, and the lighter blue line represents the training data. Depending on the respective model, the black/orange/pink line displays the forecast for the validation period. Depending on the respective model, the grey/lime green/yellow line indicates the forecast for the entire period. c. Forecasts for GWD for borehole H2N0521 in the Csa subregion, respectively. The dark blue line represents the validation data, and the lighter blue line represents the training data. Depending on the respective model, the black/orange/pink line displays the forecast for the validation period. Depending on the respective model, the grey/lime green/yellow line indicates the forecast for the entire period.
Figure 12.
a. Forecasts for Worcester T, P, ET and GWD for borehole 30,959 in the Csa subregion, respectively. The dark blue line represents the validation data, and the lighter blue line represents the training data. Depending on the respective model, the black/orange/pink line displays the forecast for the validation period. Depending on the respective model, the grey/lime green/yellow line indicates the forecast for the entire period. b. Forecasts for GWD for boreholes 3319CB00015, 3319CB00003, H1N0018 and H1N0055 in the Csa subregion, respectively. The dark blue line represents the validation data, and the lighter blue line represents the training data. Depending on the respective model, the black/orange/pink line displays the forecast for the validation period. Depending on the respective model, the grey/lime green/yellow line indicates the forecast for the entire period. c. Forecasts for GWD for borehole H2N0521 in the Csa subregion, respectively. The dark blue line represents the validation data, and the lighter blue line represents the training data. Depending on the respective model, the black/orange/pink line displays the forecast for the validation period. Depending on the respective model, the grey/lime green/yellow line indicates the forecast for the entire period.
Table 1.
Boreholes chosen for further analysis, the period for which data were available to analyse and the forecast period.
Table 1.
Boreholes chosen for further analysis, the period for which data were available to analyse and the forecast period.
| NGA |
| Station |
Borehole ID |
Subregion according to Köppen-Geiger classification |
Period analysed |
Forecast period |
Distance and direction from the station |
Elevation (m) |
Usage status |
| Beaufort-West |
3222BC00170 |
BWk |
1980 - 2004 |
2004 - 2028 |
4.71km SW |
860 |
Measurements ceased after 2004 |
| 3222BC00179 |
1980 - 2004 |
2004 - 2028 |
4.71 km SW |
860 |
| 3222BC00152 |
1980 - 1999 |
1999 - 2018 |
0.45 km SW |
860 |
Abandoned |
| 3222BC00171 |
1980 - 1999 |
1999 - 2018 |
4.71 km SW |
860 |
| Hermanus |
3419AD00004 |
Csb |
1956 - 1984 |
1984 - 2012 |
4.73 km NE |
20 |
Abandoned |
| Worcester |
30959 |
Csa |
1982 - 1992 |
1992 - 2002 |
3.84 km SW |
205 |
In use: unknown consumer (the old H1N0018) |
| 3319CB00015 |
1982 - 1992 |
1992 - 2002 |
10.15 km NW |
209 |
Abandoned |
| 3319CB00003 |
1982 - 1992 |
1992 - 2002 |
7.09 km W |
204 |
| HYDSTRA |
| Beaufort West |
J2N0001 |
BWk |
1963-2021 |
2022-2042 |
10.1 km N |
944 |
Local municipal use |
| J2N0019 |
1974-2019 |
2020-2038 |
1.46 km E |
852 |
| J2N0041 |
1974-2021 |
2022-2042 |
4.66 km SW |
860 |
| J2N0043 |
2007-2021 |
2022-2042 |
9.1 km NNW |
1074 |
| J2N0550 |
1975- present |
2022-2042 |
22.56 km NE |
979 |
In use: Unknown consumer |
| J2N0618 |
2004-present |
2022-2042 |
0.97 WNW |
869 |
| Prins Albert |
J2N0580 |
BWh |
2005-2022 |
2022-2040 |
13.1 km S |
705 |
In use: Unknown consumer |
| J2N0582 |
2005-2022 |
2022-2040 |
15.46 km S |
762 |
| J2N0620 |
2006-2022 |
2022-2038 |
15.6 km S |
742 |
| J2N0621 |
2007-2022 |
2022-2038 |
11.29 km S |
674 |
| Worcester |
H1N0018 |
Csa |
1981-2022 |
2022-2040 |
3.84 km SW |
205 |
In use: Unknown consumer |
| H1N0055 |
1978-2022 |
1.02 km SE |
209 |
| H2N0521 |
2004-2022 |
5.24 km NE |
247 |
Table 2.
Pearson and Spearman’s rank correlation test results for temperature (T), precipitation (P), evapotranspiration (ET) and groundwater depth (GWD) (J2N0580, J2N0582, J2N0620, J2N0621) variables in the BWh subregion.
Table 2.
Pearson and Spearman’s rank correlation test results for temperature (T), precipitation (P), evapotranspiration (ET) and groundwater depth (GWD) (J2N0580, J2N0582, J2N0620, J2N0621) variables in the BWh subregion.
| Pearson’s |
| |
T |
P |
ET |
J2N0580 |
J2N0582 |
J2N0620 |
J2N0621 |
| T |
1 |
0.16 |
0.52 |
-0.14 |
0.0014 |
-0.2 |
0.05 |
| P |
0.16 |
1 |
0.34 |
0.059 |
0.31 |
0.039 |
0.18 |
| ET |
0.52 |
0.34 |
1 |
0.18 |
0.36 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
| J2N0580 |
-0.14 |
0.059 |
0,18 |
1 |
0.079 |
-0.082 |
0.67 |
| J2N0582 |
0.0014 |
0.31 |
0.36 |
0.079 |
1 |
0.38 |
0.46 |
| J2N0620 |
-0.2 |
0.039 |
0.2 |
-0.082 |
0.38 |
1 |
0.32 |
| J2N0621 |
0.05 |
0.18 |
0.5 |
0.67 |
0.46 |
0.32 |
1 |
| Spearman’s rank |
| |
T |
P |
ET |
J2N0580 |
J2N0582 |
J2N0620 |
J2N0621 |
| T |
1 |
0.046 |
0.57 |
-0.07 |
-0.1 |
-0.2 |
0.017 |
| P |
0.046 |
1 |
0.24 |
0.23 |
0.35 |
0.29 |
0.2 |
| ET |
0.57 |
0.24 |
1 |
0.41 |
0.33 |
0.25 |
0.43 |
| J2N0580 |
-0.07 |
0.23 |
0.41 |
1 |
0.48 |
0.36 |
0.9 |
| J2N0582 |
-0.1 |
0.35 |
0.33 |
0.48 |
1 |
0.73 |
0.51 |
| J2N0620 |
-0.2 |
0.29 |
0.25 |
0.36 |
0.73 |
1 |
0.43 |
| J2N0621 |
0.017 |
0.2 |
0.43 |
0.9 |
0.51 |
0.43 |
1 |
Table 3.
Mann-Kendall (MK) test results for temperature (T), precipitation (P), evapotranspiration (ET) and groundwater depth (GWD) (J2N0580, J2N0582, J2N0620, J2N0621) variables in the BWh subregion. The tuple consists of the trend, the h-value (true/false if a trend is present), the p-value, the slope (Theil-Sen estimator/slope) and the intercept (intercept of Kendall-Theil Robust Line).
Table 3.
Mann-Kendall (MK) test results for temperature (T), precipitation (P), evapotranspiration (ET) and groundwater depth (GWD) (J2N0580, J2N0582, J2N0620, J2N0621) variables in the BWh subregion. The tuple consists of the trend, the h-value (true/false if a trend is present), the p-value, the slope (Theil-Sen estimator/slope) and the intercept (intercept of Kendall-Theil Robust Line).
| MK test results |
| |
Trend |
h |
p |
Slope |
Intercept |
| T |
‘Increasing’ |
True |
4.44 |
0.01 |
18.55 |
| P |
‘decreasing’ |
True |
3.23 |
-0.08 |
12.70 |
| ET |
‘decreasing’ |
True |
1.83 |
-0.07 |
42.73 |
| Hydstra GWD |
J2N0580 |
‘lowering’ |
True |
7.01 |
-0.01 |
-9.12 |
| J2N0582 |
‘lowering’ |
True |
1.72 |
- 0.04 |
-6.68 |
| J2N0620 |
‘lowering’ |
True |
4.44 |
-0.02 |
-8.44 |
| J2N0621 |
‘lowering’ |
True |
0.0 |
-0.06 |
-2.40 |
Table 4.
Pearson and Spearman’s rank correlation test results for temperature (T), precipitation (P), and groundwater depth (GWD) (3222BC00170, 3222BC00179, 3222BC00152 and 3222BC00171) variables in the BWk subregion.
Table 4.
Pearson and Spearman’s rank correlation test results for temperature (T), precipitation (P), and groundwater depth (GWD) (3222BC00170, 3222BC00179, 3222BC00152 and 3222BC00171) variables in the BWk subregion.
| Pearson’s |
| |
T |
P |
3222BC00170 |
3222BC00179 |
3222BC00152 |
3222BC00171 |
| T |
1 |
0.25 |
-0.18 |
-0.084 |
-0.31 |
-0.17 |
| P |
0.25 |
1 |
-0.055 |
0.0054 |
-0.051 |
-0.17 |
| 3222BC00170 |
-0.18 |
-0.055 |
1 |
0.85 |
0.61 |
0.92 |
| 3222BC00179 |
-0.084 |
0.0054 |
0.85 |
1 |
0.33 |
0.71 |
| 3222BC00152 |
-0.31 |
-0.051 |
0.61 |
0.33 |
1 |
0.71 |
| 3222BC00171 |
-0.17 |
-0.17 |
0.92 |
0.71 |
0.71 |
1 |
| Spearman’s |
| |
T |
P |
3222BC00170 |
3222BC00179 |
3222BC00152 |
3222BC00171 |
| T |
1 |
0.3 |
-0.23 |
-0.14 |
-0.28 |
-0.18 |
| P |
0.3 |
1 |
-0.15 |
-0.023 |
-0.2 |
-0.31 |
| 3222BC00170 |
-0.23 |
-0.15 |
1 |
0.68 |
0.63 |
0.8 |
| 3222BC00179 |
-0.14 |
-0.023 |
0.68 |
1 |
-0.048 |
0.15 |
| 3222BC00152 |
-0.28 |
-0.2 |
0.63 |
-0.048 |
1 |
0.77 |
| 3222BC00171 |
-0.18 |
-0.31 |
0.8 |
0.15 |
0.77 |
1 |
Table 5.
Pearson and Spearman’s rank correlation test results for temperature (T), precipitation (P), evapotranspiration (ET) and groundwater depth (GWD) (J2N0001, J2N0019, J2N0041, J2N0043, J2N0550 and J2N0618) variables in the BWk subregion.
Table 5.
Pearson and Spearman’s rank correlation test results for temperature (T), precipitation (P), evapotranspiration (ET) and groundwater depth (GWD) (J2N0001, J2N0019, J2N0041, J2N0043, J2N0550 and J2N0618) variables in the BWk subregion.
| Pearson’s |
| |
T |
P |
ET |
J2N0001 |
J2N0019 |
J2N0041 |
J2N0043 |
J2N0550 |
J2N0618 |
| T |
1 |
0.35 |
0.74 |
-0.12 |
-0.4 |
-0.21 |
-0.26 |
-0.11 |
-0.16 |
| P |
0.35 |
1 |
0.35 |
0.12 |
0.038 |
0.1 |
0.053 |
0.15 |
0.17 |
| ET |
0.74 |
0.35 |
1 |
0.12 |
-0.062 |
0.1 |
-0.063 |
0.24 |
0.13 |
| J2N0001 |
-0.12 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
1 |
0.8 |
0.79 |
0.6 |
0.65 |
0.68 |
| J2N0019 |
-0.4 |
0.038 |
-0.062 |
0.8 |
1 |
0.84 |
0.7 |
0.76 |
0.77 |
| J2N0041 |
-0.21 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.79 |
0.84 |
1 |
0.84 |
0.81 |
0.94 |
| J2N0043 |
-0.26 |
0.053 |
-0.063 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
0.84 |
1 |
0.72 |
0.85 |
| J2N0550 |
-0.11 |
0.15 |
0.24 |
0.65 |
0.76 |
0.81 |
0.72 |
1 |
0.84 |
| J2N0618 |
-0.16 |
0.17 |
0.13 |
0.68 |
0.77 |
0.94 |
0.85 |
0.84 |
1 |
| Spearman’s |
| |
T |
P |
ET |
J2N0001 |
J2N0019 |
J2N0041 |
J2N0043 |
J2N0550 |
J2N0618 |
| T |
1 |
0.3 |
0.74 |
-0.12 |
-0.41 |
-0.22 |
-0.26 |
-0.095 |
-0.16 |
| P |
0.3 |
1 |
0.26 |
0.12 |
0.065 |
0.074 |
0.062 |
0.14 |
0.13 |
| ET |
0.74 |
0.26 |
1 |
0.14 |
-0.094 |
0.099 |
-0.026 |
0.25 |
0.14 |
| J2N0001 |
-0.12 |
0.12 |
0.14 |
1 |
0.86 |
0.85 |
0.77 |
0.77 |
0.82 |
| J2N0019 |
-0.41 |
0.065 |
-0.094 |
0.86 |
1 |
0.87 |
0.79 |
0.81 |
0.82 |
| J2N0041 |
-0.22 |
0.074 |
0.099 |
0.85 |
0.87 |
1 |
0.87 |
0.83 |
0.95 |
| J2N0043 |
-0.26 |
0.062 |
-0.026 |
0.77 |
0.79 |
0.87 |
1 |
0.74 |
0.85 |
| J2N0550 |
-0.095 |
0.14 |
0.25 |
0.77 |
0.81 |
0.83 |
0.74 |
1 |
0.86 |
| J2N0618 |
-0.16 |
0.13 |
0.14 |
0.82 |
0.82 |
0.95 |
0.85 |
0.86 |
1 |
Table 6.
Mann-Kendall (MK) test results for temperature (T), precipitation (P), evapotranspiration (ET) and groundwater depth (GWD) (3222BC00170, 3222BC00179, 3222BC00152, 3222BC00171, J2N0001, J2N0019, J2N0041, J2N0043, J2N0550 and J2N0618 ) variables in the BWk subregion. The tuple consists of the trend, the h-value (true/false if a trend is present), the p-value, the slope (Theil-Sen estimator/slope) and the intercept (intercept of Kendall-Theil Robust Line).
Table 6.
Mann-Kendall (MK) test results for temperature (T), precipitation (P), evapotranspiration (ET) and groundwater depth (GWD) (3222BC00170, 3222BC00179, 3222BC00152, 3222BC00171, J2N0001, J2N0019, J2N0041, J2N0043, J2N0550 and J2N0618 ) variables in the BWk subregion. The tuple consists of the trend, the h-value (true/false if a trend is present), the p-value, the slope (Theil-Sen estimator/slope) and the intercept (intercept of Kendall-Theil Robust Line).
| MK test results |
| |
Trend |
h |
p |
Slope |
Intercept |
| T |
‘Increasing’ |
True |
0.0 |
0.003 |
17.93 |
| P |
‘decreasing’ |
True |
2.53 |
-0.03 |
24.06 |
| ET |
‘decreasing’ |
True |
2.26 |
-0.05 |
48.56 |
| NGA GWD |
3222BC00170 |
‘no trend’ |
False |
0.51 |
-0.002 |
-10.41 |
| 3222BC00179 |
‘rising’ |
True |
3.42 |
0.02 |
-15.71 |
| 3222BC00152 |
‘no trend’ |
False |
0.08 |
0.02 |
-16.40 |
| 3222BC00171 |
‘no trend’ |
False |
0.07 |
0.01 |
-11.25 |
| Hydstra GWD |
J2N0001 |
‘lowering’ |
True |
5.73 |
-0.04 |
0.43 |
| J2N0019 |
‘lowering’ |
True |
0.02 |
-0.001 |
0.009 |
| J2N0041 |
‘lowering’ |
True |
0.0 |
-0.10 |
-5.27 |
| J2N0043 |
‘lowering’ |
True |
2.49 |
-0.10 |
-19.16 |
| J2N0550 |
‘lowering’ |
True |
2.47 |
-0.01 |
-14.61 |
| J2N0618 |
‘lowering’ |
True |
6.69 |
-0.06 |
-18.81 |
Table 7.
Pearson and Spearman’s rank correlation test results for temperature (T), precipitation (P), and evapotranspiration (ET) variables in the Csb subregion. No correlations could be made with GWD since the periods did not overlap.
Table 7.
Pearson and Spearman’s rank correlation test results for temperature (T), precipitation (P), and evapotranspiration (ET) variables in the Csb subregion. No correlations could be made with GWD since the periods did not overlap.
| Pearson’s |
| |
T |
P |
ET |
| T |
1 |
-0.6 |
0.86 |
| P |
-0.6 |
1 |
-0.52 |
| ET |
0.86 |
-0.52 |
1 |
| Spearman’s |
| |
T |
P |
ET |
| T |
1 |
-0.65 |
0.84 |
| P |
-0.65 |
1 |
-0.59 |
| ET |
0.84 |
-0.59 |
1 |
Table 8.
Mann-Kendall (MK) test results for temperature (T), precipitation (P), evapotranspiration (ET) and groundwater depth (GWD) (3419AD0004) variables in the Csb subregion.
Table 8.
Mann-Kendall (MK) test results for temperature (T), precipitation (P), evapotranspiration (ET) and groundwater depth (GWD) (3419AD0004) variables in the Csb subregion.
| MK test results |
| |
Trend |
h |
p |
Slope |
Intercept |
| T |
‘Increasing’ |
True |
1.172505870172813e-09 |
0.0012 |
17.15 |
| P |
‘Increasing’ |
True |
0.003 |
0.018 |
37.98 |
| ET |
‘Increasing’ |
True |
4.8725246060143945e-11 |
0.02 |
61.91 |
| 3419AD00004 |
‘no trend’ |
False |
0.20 |
3.7976037655112905e-05 |
-0.008 |
Table 9.
Pearson and Spearman’s rank correlation test results for temperature (T), precipitation (P), evapotranspiration (ET) and groundwater depth (GWD) (H1N0018, H1N0055 and H2N0521) variables in the Csa subregion.
Table 9.
Pearson and Spearman’s rank correlation test results for temperature (T), precipitation (P), evapotranspiration (ET) and groundwater depth (GWD) (H1N0018, H1N0055 and H2N0521) variables in the Csa subregion.
| Pearson’s |
| |
T |
P |
ET |
H1N0018 |
H1N0055 |
H2N0521 |
| T |
1 |
-0.6 |
0.94 |
-0.27 |
-0.42 |
-0.092 |
| P |
-0.6 |
1 |
-0.58 |
0.24 |
0.35 |
0.015 |
| ET |
0.94 |
-0.58 |
1 |
-0.12 |
-0.26 |
-0.027 |
| H1N0018 |
-0.27 |
0.24 |
-0.12 |
1 |
0.74 |
0.35 |
| H1N0055 |
-0.42 |
0.35 |
-0.26 |
0.74 |
1 |
0.41 |
| H2N0521 |
-0.092 |
0.015 |
-0.027 |
0.35 |
0.41 |
1 |
| Spearman’s rank |
| |
T |
P |
ET |
H1N0018 |
H1N0055 |
H2N0521 |
| T |
1 |
-0.71 |
0.93 |
-0.25 |
-0.45 |
-0.083 |
| P |
-0.71 |
1 |
-0.68 |
0.26 |
0.36 |
-0.0059 |
| ET |
0.93 |
-0.68 |
1 |
-0.088 |
-0.26 |
0.0039 |
| H1N0018 |
-0.25 |
0.26 |
-0.088 |
1 |
0.74 |
0.41 |
| H1N0055 |
-0.45 |
0.36 |
-0.26 |
0.74 |
1 |
0.43 |
| H2N0521 |
-0.083 |
-0.0059 |
0.0039 |
0.41 |
0.43 |
1 |
Table 10.
Pearson and Spearman’s rank correlation test results for groundwater depth (GWD) (30959, 3319CB00015 and 3319CB00003) variables in the Csa subregion.
Table 10.
Pearson and Spearman’s rank correlation test results for groundwater depth (GWD) (30959, 3319CB00015 and 3319CB00003) variables in the Csa subregion.
| Pearson’s |
| |
30959 |
3319CB00015 |
3319CB00003 |
| 30959 |
1 |
0.78 |
0.74 |
| 3319CB00015 |
0.78 |
1 |
0.69 |
| 3319CB00003 |
0.74 |
0.69 |
1 |
| Spearman’s rank |
| |
30959 |
3319CB00015 |
3319CB00003 |
| 30959 |
1 |
0.76 |
0.8 |
| 3319CB00015 |
0.76 |
1 |
0.72 |
| 3319CB00003 |
0.8 |
0.72 |
1 |
Table 11.
Mann-Kendall (MK) test results for temperature (T), precipitation (P), evapotranspiration (ET) and groundwater depth (GWD) (H1N0018, H1N0055, H2N0521, 30959, 3319CB00015 and 3319CB00003) variables in the Csa subregion. The tuple consists of the trend, the h-value (true/false if a trend is present), the p-value, the slope (Theil-Sen estimator/slope) and the intercept (intercept of Kendall-Theil Robust Line).
Table 11.
Mann-Kendall (MK) test results for temperature (T), precipitation (P), evapotranspiration (ET) and groundwater depth (GWD) (H1N0018, H1N0055, H2N0521, 30959, 3319CB00015 and 3319CB00003) variables in the Csa subregion. The tuple consists of the trend, the h-value (true/false if a trend is present), the p-value, the slope (Theil-Sen estimator/slope) and the intercept (intercept of Kendall-Theil Robust Line).
| MK test results |
| |
Trend |
h |
p |
Slope |
Intercept |
| T |
‘decreasing’ |
True |
3.18e-05 |
-0.002 |
18.90 |
| P |
‘no trend’ |
False |
0.74 |
0.0004 |
-0.05 |
| ET |
‘Increasing’ |
True |
4.57e-11 |
0.03 |
63.28 |
| NGA GWD |
30959* |
‘rising’ |
True |
0.001 |
0.002 |
-2.69 |
| 3319CB00015 |
‘rising’ |
True |
8.51e-06 |
0.006 |
-2.33 |
| 3319CB00003 |
‘rising’ |
True |
0.0003 |
0.004 |
-2.04 |
| Hydstra GWD |
H1N0018* |
‘no trend’ |
False |
0.20 |
-7.14e-05 |
0.01 |
| H1N0055 |
‘no trend’ |
False |
0.84 |
-9.53e-05 |
-2.24 |
| H2N0521 |
‘lowering’ |
True |
3.54e-05 |
-0.0002 |
0.01 |
Table 12.
Summary of % and square km change per land-use class between 1990 and 2020 (the 2020 map out by 0,66% due to a different projection).
Table 12.
Summary of % and square km change per land-use class between 1990 and 2020 (the 2020 map out by 0,66% due to a different projection).
| |
|
% of total class |
% increase or decrease from 1990 to 2020 |
Square km |
Square km increase or decrease from 1990 to 2020 |
| Land cover class |
Description |
1990 |
2013/14 |
2020 |
1990 |
2013/14 |
2020 |
| Urban |
Any built-up surface |
0.40% |
0.46% |
0.85% |
+0.45% |
293.32 |
334.64 |
613.72 |
+320.40 |
| Forestry – plantations |
Commercial forests |
1.31% |
0.93% |
0.96% |
-0.35% |
950.53 |
675.31 |
693.63 |
-256.89 |
| Forestry – indigenous |
Natural forests |
7.75% |
9.93% |
5.73% |
-2.02% |
5643.00 |
7224.13 |
4143.73 |
-1499.27 |
| Bare land |
No economic activity. no particular use. no particular vegetation. etc |
26.85% |
25.73% |
23.46% |
-3.38% |
19537.18 |
18720.90 |
16963.19 |
-2573.99 |
| Agriculture – dryland |
Pastures/rain-fed |
11.82% |
11.54% |
12.68% |
+0.87% |
8600.63 |
8395.52 |
9169.81 |
+569.18 |
| Agriculture – irrigated |
Any irrigated crops |
1.44% |
1.77% |
2.30% |
+0.86% |
1045.57 |
1290.61 |
1660.69 |
+615.12 |
| Water surfaces |
Any water surfaces. natural and artificial |
0.46% |
0.48% |
0.46% |
0% |
334.50 |
346.19 |
335.79 |
+1.29 |
| Wetlands |
Wetlands |
1.22% |
0.88% |
0.64% |
-0.58% |
888.48 |
640.93 |
464.24 |
-424.24 |
| Grass |
No economic activity. but covered in grass |
4.60% |
2.91% |
6.69% |
+2.09% |
3346.03 |
2114.98 |
4837.03 |
+2476.42 km2
|
| Shrubland |
No economic activity. but covered in shrubs |
44.16% |
45.39% |
46.22% |
+2.06% |
32133.37 |
33029.39 |
33411.83 |
+8059.53 km2
|
Table 13.
Percentage area summary per NLC map per ET zone (BWk, BWh, Csa and Csb) in 1990, 2013/14 and 2020, respectively.
Table 13.
Percentage area summary per NLC map per ET zone (BWk, BWh, Csa and Csb) in 1990, 2013/14 and 2020, respectively.
| |
1990 |
2013/14 |
2020 |
| Land cover class |
BWk |
BWh |
Csa |
Csb |
BWk |
BWh |
Csa |
Csb |
BWk |
BWh |
Csa |
Csb |
| Urban |
0.05% |
0.02% |
0.89% |
0.55% |
0.05% |
0.00% |
0.48% |
0.75% |
0.25% |
0.24% |
2.61% |
1.17% |
| Forestry – plantations |
0.00% |
0.02% |
1.91% |
1.63% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.60% |
0.83% |
0.01% |
0.00% |
1.07% |
0.97% |
| Forestry – indigenous |
6.87% |
4.29% |
4.20% |
4.71% |
4.76% |
5.00% |
7.77% |
8.86% |
0.76% |
0.95% |
3.68% |
9.78% |
| Bare land |
54.91% |
79.69% |
0.89% |
2.79% |
49.07% |
81.00% |
3.70% |
6.66% |
40.61% |
79.33% |
2.61% |
2.22% |
| Agriculture – dryland |
0.76% |
1.18% |
7.25% |
15.89% |
0.76% |
1.00% |
6.09% |
14.49% |
0.71% |
0.51% |
11.05% |
17.68% |
| Agriculture – irrigated |
0.22% |
0.22% |
19.97% |
3.47% |
0.27% |
0.00% |
28.79% |
4.87% |
0.66% |
1.01% |
21.38% |
4.17% |
| Water surfaces |
0.06% |
0.11% |
4.45% |
2.12% |
0.10% |
0.00% |
5.38% |
1.77% |
0.09% |
0.10% |
5.34% |
1.83% |
| Wetlands |
0.54% |
0.92% |
3.69% |
2.53% |
0.36% |
1.00% |
1.91% |
1.94% |
0.22% |
0.58% |
0.83% |
1.47% |
| Grass |
4.26% |
3.48% |
4.83% |
6.27% |
2.13% |
1.00% |
5.73% |
3.04% |
3.75% |
2.47% |
2.38% |
3.91% |
| Shrubland |
32.31% |
10.07% |
51.91% |
60.04% |
42.51% |
10.00% |
39.55% |
56.78% |
52.95% |
14.81% |
49.05% |
56.80% |