Submitted:
02 October 2025
Posted:
02 October 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Backgrounds/Objectives: Trabeculectomy is the gold standard for glaucoma drainage surgery but is associated with a risk of sight-threatening complications. The PreserFlo MicroShunt (PF) is a less invasive alternative that aims to reduce complications and simplify post-operative care. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of PF to trabeculectomy in the management of glaucoma. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of 95 eyes (48 PF, 47 trabeculectomy) from a single-center private practice in Brisbane, Australia. Data were collected from November 2017 to January 2024. Primary outcomes included intraocular pressure (IOP) and number of medications. Secondary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and complications. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to baseline covariates, and weighted regression and Cox proportional hazards models were then used to estimate treatment effects. Results: The two groups had comparable patient characteristics, although the PF group was older with worse visual field mean deviation. At 12 months, both procedures significantly reduced IOP and medications; however, differences were not statistically significant between groups (2.9 mmHg; 95%CI: -2.0, 7.9; P=0.303, and 0.4; 95%CI: -0.13, 0.96; P=0.138, respectively). The estimated probabilities of qualified success were comparable (74.9% PF vs 72.5% trabeculectomy). Intra-operative stenting in PF eyes eliminated early post-operative hypotony. The incidence of open surgical revision in the PF group vs. the trabeculectomy group was 14.6% vs. 2.1% (P=0.059, respectively). PF was associated with faster post-operative inflammation resolution (hazard ratio: 6.3; 95%CI: 2.8, 14.5; P<0.001). Conclusions: Both PF and trabeculectomy are effective for glaucoma management. PF is a less invasive procedure with a lower rate of early hypotony when stented. Trabeculectomy has a tendency for lower IOP reduction and less requirement for open revision, although this did not reach statistical significance. This highlights the need for longer term studies and improved techniques such as more effective anti-fibrotic strategies.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| PF | PreserFlo MicroShunt |
| IOP | Intraocular Pressure |
| 5-FU | 5-Fluorouracil |
| MMC | Mitomycin C |
| VA | Visual Acuity |
| IPTW | Inverse probability of treatment weighting |
References
- Fili, S.; Boutsika, K.; Kokkali, S.; Patsoukis, A.; Patsouras, A.; Laspas, P.; Garnavou-Xirou, C.; Georgopoulos, G. PreserFlo™ MicroShunt Versus trabeculectomy in Patients With Moderate to Advanced Open-Angle Glaucoma: 12-Month Follow-Up of a Single-Center Prospective Study. Cureus 2022, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jamke, M.; Fritz, M.; Laspas, P.; Pfeiffer, N.; Grus, F.H.; Hoffmann, E.M. PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy: 1-year results on efficacy and safety. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2023, 261, 2901–2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pillunat, K.R.; Herber, R.; Jasper, C.; Berchner, J.; Pfeiffer, N.; Pillunat, L.E. PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy: First results on efficacy and safety. Acta Ophthalmol. 2022, 100, 779–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, A.; Khan, A.U. Comparing the safety and efficacy of PreserFlo Microshunt implantation and trabeculectomy for glaucoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol. 2024, 102, 443–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Governatori, L.; Oliverio, L.; Mermoud, A.; Scampoli, A.; Sarati, F.; Carradori, A.; Catalani, R.; Monaco, C.; Caporossi, T.; Rizzo, S. PreserFlo MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy: An updated meta-analysis and systematic review. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2024; online ahead of print. [Google Scholar]
- Lupardi, E.; Laffi, G.L.; Moramarco, A.; Barboni, P.; Fontana, L. Systematic PreserFlo MicroShunt Intraluminal Stenting for Hypotony Prevention in Highly Myopic Patients: A Comparative Study. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chami, J.; Tan, J.C.K.; Manning, D.; Weiss, J.; Schlenker, M.B.; Ahmed, I.I.K. Comparative Study of Early Safety and Effectiveness Outcomes of the PreserFlo MicroShunt with and without an Intraluminal Suture Stent. Ophthalmol. Glaucoma, 2025; online ahead of print. [Google Scholar]
- Bhayani, R.; Jawla, S.; Trikha, S.; Mehta, R.; Ahir, B.K.; Lyall, D.A.M.; Chandra, A.; Ahmed, F.; Smith, H.B. Short-term safety and efficacy of PreserFlo™ Microshunt in glaucoma patients: A multicentre retrospective cohort study. Eye (Lond.) 2023, 37, 644–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beckers, H.J.M.; Aptel, F.; Webers, C.A.B.; Bluwol, E.; Martinez-de-la-Casa, J.M.; Cordeiro, M.F.; Stalmans, I.; Vandewalle, E.; García-Feijoó, J. Safety and Effectiveness of the PRESERFLO® MicroShunt in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Results from a 2-Year Multicenter Study. Ophthalmol. Glaucoma 2022, 5, 195–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Majtanova, N.; Takacova, A.; Kurilova, V.; Hejsek, L.; Majtan, J.; Kolar, P. One-Year Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of PreserFlo MicroShunt with Mitomycin C Applied by Sub-Tenon Injection Versus Sponge. Ophthalmol. Ther. 2025, 14, 153–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ibarz Barberá, M.; López-Grau, N.S.; Amaro-Alcázar, A.; Morales-Fernandez, L.; García-Feijoó, J.; Martínez-de-la-Casa, J.M. Bleb geometry and morphology after PreserFlo Microshunt surgery: Risk factors for surgical failure. PLoS ONE 2023, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hasan, S.M.; Qureshi, T.A.; Dhanda, S.; Kamran, A.; Shah, S.U.A.; Rahman, F.Z. Comparison of Bleb Morphology following PRESERFLO® MicroShunt and trabeculectomy Using Anterior Segment OCT. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023, 13, 3617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tanner, A.; Haddow, J.; Ahir, B.K.; Lyall, D.A.M.; Jawla, S.; Ahmed, F.; Chandra, A.; Bhayani, R. One-year surgical outcomes of the PreserFlo MicroShunt in glaucoma: A multicentre analysis. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2023, 107, 1104–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baker, N.D.; Barnebey, H.S.; Moster, M.R.; Flowers, B.E.; Maslin, J.S.; Grover, D.S.; Panarelli, J.F.; Sarkisian, S.R.; Noecker, R.J.; Kahook, M.Y.; et al. Ab-Externo MicroShunt versus Trabeculectomy in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: One-Year Results from a 2-Year Randomized, Multicenter Study. Ophthalmology 2021, 128, 1710–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zweifel, L.A.B.; Storp, J.J.; Vietmeier, F.E.; Eter, N.; Brücher, V.C. PreserFlo MicroShunt versus Trabeculectomy: Efficacy and Surgical Success within a Heterogenous Patient Cohort. Life (Basel) 2024, 14, 1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nobl, M.; Mansouri, K.; Herbey, R.; Bravetti, G.E.; Funk, J.; Shaarawy, T. One-Year Outcomes of PreserFlo™ MicroShunt Implantation versus trabeculectomy for Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 2844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Batlle, J.F.; Fantes, F.; Riss, I.; Pinchuk, L.; Alburquerque, R.; Kato, Y.P.; Arrieta, E.; Peralta, A.C.; Palmberg, P.; Parrish, R.K. Long-term Results of the PRESERFLO MicroShunt in Patients With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma From a Single-center Nonrandomized Study. J. Glaucoma 2021, 30, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sadruddin, O.; Pinchuk, L.; Angeles, R.; Palmberg, P.; Parrish, R.K.; Weber, B.A.; Mehra, K.S. Ab externo implantation of the MicroShunt, a poly (styrene-block-isobutylene-block-styrene) surgical device for the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma: A review. Eye Vis. (Lond.) 2019, 6, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Strzalkowska, A.; Al-Mugheiry, T.S.; Trikha, S.; Verma, S.; Stalmans, I.; Dick, A.D. Outcomes of Open Bleb Revision After PreserFlo MicroShunt Failure in Patients With Glaucoma. J. Glaucoma 2023, 32, 681–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saeed, E.; Tailor, R.; Novák, J.; Ghosh, S.; Ionides, A.; Lash, S.C. The PreserFlo MicroShunt in the Context of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: A Narrative Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 2964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]






| PF (n=48) | Trabeculectomy (n=47) | P value |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Eye – right (%) | 24 (50.0) | 27 (57.5) | 0.467 |
| Sex – male (%) | 25 (52.1) | 21 (44.7) | 0.470 |
| Age, mean (years) (SD) | 72.9 (9.6) | 65.3 (13.8) | 0.002 |
| Ethnicity | 0.211 | ||
| Caucasian (%) | 45 (93.8) | 41 (87.2) | |
| Asian (%) | 2 (4.2) | 6 (12.8) | |
| Other (%) | 1 (2.1) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Glaucoma severity | 0.034 | ||
| Mild (%) | 16 (34.8) | 27 (57.4) | |
| Moderate (%) | 9 (19.6) | 10 (21.3) | |
| Severe (%) | 21 (45.7) | 10 (21.3) | |
| Glaucoma type | 0.439 | ||
| POAG (%) | 35 (72.9) | 39 (83.0) | |
| PACG (%) | 3 (6.3) | 1 (2.1) | |
| Other (%) | 10 (20.8) | 7 (14.9) | |
| Pre-operative IOP | 0.174 | ||
| ≤ 21 mmHg (%) | 24 (50.0) | 17 (36.2) | |
| > 21 mmHg (%) | 24 (50.0) | 30 (63.8) | |
| Pre-operative IOP, mean (mmHg) (SD) | 23.0 (6.2) |
26.5 (8.1) | 0.020 |
| Pre-operative medications | 0.355 | ||
| ≤ 3 (%) | 22 (45.8) | 26 (55.3) | |
| 4 or 5 (%) | 26 (54.2) | 21 (44.7) | |
| Number of medications, mean (SD) | 3.5 (1.2) | 3.4 (0.9) | 0.473 |
| Diamox (%) | 8 (16.7) | 16 (34.0) | 0.051 |
| Best corrected visual acuity, mean (SD) | -0.75 (0.26) | -0.76 (0.29) | 0.861 |
| Mean deviation(dB) (SD) | -11.1 (7.8) | -7.3 (6.6) | 0.014 |
| Lens – phakic (%) | 26 (54.2) | 22 (46.8) | 0.473 |
| Surgical ocular history | 35 (76.1) | 37 (80.4) | 0.613 |
| Operation details | |||
| Intraluminal stenting | |||
| Stenting (%) | 40 (83.3) | - | |
| Removal (%) | 31 (77.5) | - | |
| Time to removal, mean (weeks) (SD) | 7.8 (10.5) | - | |
| Time to removal, median (weeks) (interquartile range) | 4 (2, 8) | - | |
| MMC (%) | 0.131 | ||
| 0.01 (%) | 2 (4.2) | 1 (2.1) | |
| 0.02 (%) | 17 (60.4) | 20 (42.6) | |
| 0.03 (%) | 29 (60.4) | 20 (42.6) |
| Time point | PF Mean IOP | Δ within PF* | Trab Mean IOP | Δ within Trab* | Δ between Groups | P value (between groups) |
95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preop | 24.9 | 25.0 | |||||
| Day 1 | 8.6 | -16.3 | 15.6 | -9.5 | -6.8 | 0.004 | -11.5, -2.2 |
| Week 1 | 9.7 | -15.2 | 13.4 | -11.6 | -3.6 | 0.086 | -7.7, 0.5 |
| Month 1 | 12.7 | -12.2 | 10.4 | -14.6 | 2.4 | 0.247 | -1.7, 6.5 |
| Month 3 | 11.4 | -13.5 | 9.9 | -15.1 | 1.6 | 0.468 | -2.7, 5.9 |
| Month 6 | 12.1 | -12.8 | 9.2 | -15.9 | 3.0 | 0.145 | -1.1, 7.2 |
| Month 12 | 13.1 | -11.8 | 10.3 | -14.7 | 2.9 | 0.246 | -2.0, 7.9 |
| Time point | PF Mean Meds | Δ within PF* | Trab Mean Meds | Δ within Trab* | Δ between Groups | P value (between groups) |
95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preop | 3.43 | 3.50 | |||||
| Week 1 | 0.21 | -3.21 | 0.09 | -3.41 | 0.20 | 0.284 | -0.16, 0.56 |
| Month 1 | 0.07 | -3.36 | 0.17 | -3.33 | -0.03 | 0.848 | -0.38, 0.32 |
| Month 6 | 0.21 | -3.22 | 0.18 | -3.32 | 0.10 | 0.629 | -0.31, 0.51 |
| Month 12 | 0.54 | -2.88 | 0.20 | -3.30 | 0.41 | 0.138 | -0.13, 0.96 |
| Complication | PF (n=48) | Trab (n=47) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Early numerical hypotony (%) | 6 (14.6) | 6 (12.8) | 1.00 |
| Late IOP ≤ 5mmHg (%) | 0 (0) | 6 (12.8) (5 numerical hypotony) |
0.012 |
| Clinically significant hypotony with choroidal effusion (%) | 1 (2.1) | 1 (2.1) | 1.00 |
| Macroscopic hyphaema (%) |
2 (4.2) | 1 (2.1) | 1.00 |
| Intracameral tube truncation (%) | 1 (2.1) | N/A | |
| Extrusion (%) | 1 (2.1) | N/A | |
| Bleb Leak (%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (4.2) | 0.242 |
| Blebitis/endophthalmitis (%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2.1) | 0.495 |
| Peripheral iris incarceration (%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2.1) | 0.495 |
| Bleb needling | |||
| Eyes that had needling (%) | 16 (33.3) | 13 (27.7) | 0.548 |
| No. of needlings in the group, mean (SD) | 0.6 (0.9) | 0.4 (0.7) | 0.344 |
| No. of needlings in eyes that had needlings, mean (SD) | 1.6 (0.7) | 1.5 (0.7) | 0.622 |
| No. of needlings in eyes that had needlings, median (IQR) | 1 (1, 2) | 1 (1, 2) |
|
| Time (months) to first needling, mean (SD) | 2.6 (2.9) | 1.9 (3.2) | 0.531 |
| Time (months) to first needling, median (IQR) | 1.2 (0.4, 3.7) | 0.9 ( 0.5, 1.3) | |
| Additional glaucoma surgeries (%) | 10 (20.8) | 2 (4.3) | 0.027 |
| Open Revision (%) | 7 (14.6) |
2 (4.2) |
0.059 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).